Joint Committee Meeting on Apartment Inspection Ordinance - March 30, 2026
Joint Committee Meeting on Apartment Inspection Ordinance - March 30, 2026
The Joint Committee on Housing and Affordability and Economic Development met on March 30, 2026, to discuss the proposed amendments to the Chapter 10 Apartment Inspection Ordinance. The meeting featured presentations from the City Legal Department, Houston Public Works, the Houston Health Department, and the Mayor's Administration, followed by public testimony. The committee reviewed feedback from two citywide public meetings (held February 19 and March 5, 2026) and discussed the framework for a high-risk apartment inspection program aimed at repeat offenders. The meeting was chaired by Councilmember Thomas and concluded at 3:19 p.m. The next Housing and Affordability Committee meeting is scheduled for April 18, 2026.
Public Comments & Testimony
- Pastor Camellia Joseph (Kingdom Works Ministries & Congregational Land Development, Greater Houston) urged the city to prioritize rental housing, noting that many residents in hospitality and healthcare cannot afford homeownership. She highlighted that median housing cost rose from $794 to $1,362 (2010-2026) and that a $15/hour earner spends over 50% of income on rent. She also called for partnering with faith-based organizations to develop affordable housing on church-owned land.
- Deborah Davis (Center of Excellence for Housing Community Policy Research, Texas Southern University) presented research on 311 inequity: Hispanic-majority tracts call significantly less for infrastructure and environmental issues (due to language barriers and distrust), while Black communities call more for nuisance complaints but less for infrastructure. She posed five questions: (1) Is 311 sufficient as an intake system? (2) What inspection model finds violations? (3) Will registration fund itself and improve enforcement? (4) What enforcement tools change landlord behavior? (5) Could stronger enforcement harm tenants? She offered partnership to address these issues.
- Ben McFall (Vice President of Government Affairs, Houston Apartment Association) thanked the committee for addressing manager liability but raised concerns about (a) the transfer of ownership clause (section 10-174) that could disincentivize sales, (b) the provision that a single violation within six months after remediation could extend a property's stay on the high-risk list, and (c) the need to reconcile the 12-property pilot with the citywide ordinance. He welcomed a property owner member from HAA to serve on the advisory committee.
- Julia Arduña (Texas Housers) noted a correlation between poor housing conditions and high evictions, based on an eviction snapshot. She stressed the need for tenant safety in reporting issues and improving 311 to address fear of retaliation.
- Laura Gallier (District C resident and candidate) reported universal community support for apartment inspections, even among landlords. She criticized 311 for prematurely closing cases without resolution and urged better communication when cases are transferred between departments.
- Mary Wright (unaffiliated) thanked the committee for conducting public engagement and listening to feedback.
Discussion Items
- City Legal Department (Attorney Michelle): Provided an overview of the ordinance framework: properties with 10 violations in a six-month period must register, subject to appeal. Inspections focus on life-safety issues (stairwells, lighting, etc.). Non-compliance can result in daily fines up to $2,000. The ordinance is intended to be organic and will be monitored through a committee of city departments. Attorney Michelle confirmed the city has legal authority to implement the program and that adequate channels exist for property owners to contest findings.
- Houston Public Works (Chris Shanahan, Assistant Director / Building Official): Described the existing Multifamily Habitability Program (2009 ordinance), which applies to complexes with 3+ units. Inspections occur on a 4-year cycle (programmatic) or via 311 service requests (3,300-3,600/year). The team (3 senior inspectors, 12 field inspectors, 1 assistant chief, 1 manager) completes ~1,200 programmatic inspections annually. The proposed High-Risk Apartment Inspection Program would target repeat offenders with elevated enforcement, including daily fines of $250-$2,000. Re-inspection period would be shortened from 60 to 30 days, with flexibility for major repairs requiring engineering plans.
- Discussion: Councilmember Thomas asked about correlation between 311 data and known problem properties; public works acknowledged that some properties never fix violations over the 4-year cycle, necessitating a faster track. Councilmember Alcorn asked about re-inspection timing (confirmed 30 days in new ordinance). Vice Mayor Pro Tem Peck clarified that the high-risk list is built from both 311 calls and inspector observations. Councilmember Thomas also raised the need for cross-departmental deconfliction, suggesting using HPD's CERT (Community Environmental Response Teams) to complement public works inspections. Staff from Councilmember Huffman's office asked who will chair the advisory committee (public works will have two vice chairs) and why the Houston Apartment Association is not directly represented (administration preferred practitioner-led with property owner representation).
- Houston Health Department (Roger Seely, Assistant Director): Presented the apartment compliance program: a team of 5 investigators, 1 community involvement coordinator, 2 field supervisors, and 1 manager responded to and resolved over 12,000 cases in the last three years, at an average cost of $200 per resolved case. Common complaints include water intrusion, pest infestations, lack of hot water, HVAC failures, and sewage overflows. Inspectors typically respond within 3 business days and give 7-10 days to correct violations, with shorter timelines for emergencies. Citations are directed at property owners, not managers, as a matter of policy.
- Discussion: Councilmember Thomas asked about determining compliance timelines (discretion based on severity and number of units) and ensuring citations go to owners, not managers. She noted that property managers should provide owner contact information. The health department confirmed they are working with legal on proper citation procedures. Councilmember Thomas also raised the issue of mold: while the health department does not test for mold, it addresses underlying causes (leaks, humidity). She noted that New York City cites mold as a hazardous condition if >10 sq ft visible. She emphasized the need for guidance on mold given Houston's climate.
- Mayor's Administration (Stephen David): Presented the Apartment Ordinance Feedback (AOF) document, listing 24 items from community meetings. He identified items resolved in the proposed draft (version 2) or planned for operational implementation, including tenant rights information hub (codified in section 1770-177), designated health department contact (1 FTE community involvement coordinator), language-accessible materials (using Department of Neighborhoods language access program and AI translation). Unresolved items: moving costs (to be monitored during pilot; relocation costs estimated at $30,000-$50,000 per unit); forced property sales (not authorized by state law, but high-risk list and escalating fines can encourage compliance); transfer to vetted management companies (not compelled by ordinance); pre-inspections (to be included in pilot); expansion of inspection staff (to be evaluated post-pilot); and funding mechanism ($50 per unit assessment - to be considered after pilot data). He confirmed a pilot of 12 properties (6 with Certificate of Occupancy, 6 without) over the next year, with the ability to add more. The pilot is operational, not codified, to allow flexibility.
- Discussion: Councilmember Thomas urged expanding the pilot to at least 20-25 properties to create a meaningful deterrent effect and suggested making the top 25 list public to encourage voluntary compliance. Administration agreed to consider. Councilmember Thomas also emphasized clear communication to tenants about timelines, fees, and available resources, and suggested that rent increases be prohibited for high-risk properties during remediation. She noted that the housing authority's processes for voucher holders should be clearly communicated. Councilmember Alcorn asked for differentiated timelines for structural vs. health-related repairs; the administration acknowledged that existing code already has timeframes based on life safety, and that public communication of compliance status would help manage expectations.
Key Outcomes
- The administration will provide an updated document addressing additional feedback from HAA and Texas Housers by March 31, 2026, for distribution to the committee.
- The advisory committee will be practitioner-led, with public works holding two vice-chair positions and including a property owner representative (potentially from HAA membership) and a tenant representative.
- A pilot program will launch with 12 high-risk properties (6 with CO, 6 without) for one year, with the ability to add more as compliance is achieved. The pilot will inform future staffing, budget, and ordinance amendments.
- Re-inspection period for violations will be reduced from 60 to 30 days for the high-risk program, with flexibility for good-faith efforts on major repairs (e.g., roof replacements, elevator repairs).
- New owners of properties on the high-risk list must resolve all outstanding citations within 180 days (section 10-175), with possibility of extension for complex repairs.
- The city will enhance tenant education through a website hub, multilingual materials, and coordination with housing authority to clarify voucher portability.
- The committee intends to bring the ordinance to a vote within 30 days, with the pilot operational in parallel.
- The next Housing and Affordability Committee meeting is scheduled for April 18, 2026.
Meeting Transcript
Councilmember Thomas, who is the chair of our housing and affordability commit committee, and we will now call this meeting to order. I'd like to welcome uh the council members and staff that are in attendance today. Councilmember Carter is here, Councilmember Alcorn is here, Vice Mayor Pro Tim Peck is here. We also have staff from Councilmember Castillo's office, staff from Councilmember Salinas' office, staff from uh Councilmember Ramirez's office, staff from Councilmember Huffman's office, staff from Councilmember Jackson's office, and also staff from Councilmember Cayman's office, and of course the uh incredible staff that has been helping us produce uh our community meetings and all of the work, uh the staff from Councilmember Thomas's office and the staff from uh my office uh uh DD and Justice. Thank y'all also for um being here. So this meeting is open to the public. It's also it's being held in person and virtually. We are also broadcasting uh via HTV. Council members and staff, y'all know the drill. We'll do the presentations and then you can ask questions if you are online, you can put your questions in the chat pot. Um there are six members of the public that have signed up to speak today. If you are here and you did not sign up prior to today, there is a sheet on the uh desk here to my left, uh and you can sign up to speak today. If there are um any other um staff from councilmember Davis's office has also joined us. Um if there is anything in particular that you'd like to share with us, our our council offices are still accepting feedback, um, but we will move forward expeditiously. Councilmember Thomas, do you want to jump in and make any opening remarks? Uh and then we'll just jump into uh you leading us off on our agenda for today. Let's get this party started. Uh so on today's agenda for the joint committee, and I want to just thank all of the city departments that are here, but who actively participated in uh the two citywide uh public meetings, your contribution expertise was paramount, and thank you for meeting the constituents constituents where they're at in regards to their issues. Um I really appreciate that. And just to recap some of the meetings, we'll go through the feedback later in the presentation, but we had hundreds who participated online, uh, who watched. So I want to just appreciate the fact that technology has really helped advance um today's agenda. So today's joint committee will hear from several departments regarding the apartment inspection ordinance. Um I want to start by calling up first the city legal department will provide an overview of the latest version of the chapter 10 apartment inspection ordinance. Uh Attorney Michelle, are you ready? Yes. I want to give you some time. Okay. And then following our city attorney, we'll hear from Houston Public Works. Thank you. And so this ordinance has been in the works for a bit. Uh what people are really trying to focus on is how do we have something that's fair, provides notice, and is workable for people. So we came up with a scheme where if you have 10 violations in a six-month period, you're required to register. There's a period of time to register that can be appealed. Once after that happens, uh, they're subject to an inspection. There's notice for that. These are life safety issues, uh, stairwells, lighting, things of that nature. Uh, then they're given a certain period to rectify it. Uh if they do that and everything's in compliance for a period of time, then they no longer have to register. Um, but if they don't rectify it, and they can also be repeat offenders, they can be fined on a daily basis up to $2,000. Uh and this also includes things such as a lack of um uh certificate of occupancy that's going to be required. There's a committee of the various departments that are involved that meet for this purpose to determine how compliance is going to make sure the inspections are occurring and following through on things of that nature. At the end of the day, what we hope to do is to monitor this, see how the number 10 works, see how well is the committee working, get the feedback from not only the tenants but also the uh apartment owners, and we'll this is going to be an organic document that we'll look at to see what can be done. But that is really the essential framework, and I think really the heart of it is hearing from the departments that will be doing the inspection, the permitting, and they can put more meat on this. Thank you. Uh colleagues, do you have any legal questions that you want to address our city attorney on? If not, we'll move to our next hold on one second. Um attorney Michelle, has the legal department been able to review any of the feedback from our operators and leaseholders who participated and submitted um recommendations. Have you been able to review that and have responses prepared? Yes, we've been able to review it, and I think you know, for the most part, really it's the opportunity is we clearly have the legal ability to do that. What they're really looking for is are there adequate channels for people to contest any findings or any determinations?
openpublica.com