The meeting began at 5:30 p.m. with a work session on ZB1130M (Corridor Square, LLC) to review the hearing examiner's report on a zoning map amendment from TOD to B-2 for a gas station, convenience store, and car wash on 3.91 acres, including a portion of the Rosa Bonheur Memorial Park. At 7:00 p.m., the board paused for an administrative meeting on ZB1134M (Olde Scaggsville, LLC) to decide whether the zoning board or hearing examiner would hear the case. The work session resumed after the administrative meeting.
This webinar is being recorded and summarized. Good evening. The purpose of this zoning presentation and work session is to continue case ZB 1130M quarter square LLC. We will review the hearing examiner's report as well as the exceptions to that report and discuss and vote on this zoning map amendment petition. We will also discuss some preliminary matters that arose from the last meeting. Please be advised that at seven we will pause to hold the administrative meeting on ZB 1134 M and ZB 1134 PDP. We will then resume this presentation and work session. At this time, Miss Berg, will you please call the roll for board members? Chair Youngman. Here Miss Rigby. Here. Dr. Jones. Good evening, everyone. Miss Walsh. Here. Ms. Young. I believe that she is around the corner. So a quorum has been confirmed. Tonight's proceeding is being conducted as a hybrid meeting, which is available in person and virtually. It is available to the public through live stream on the Howard County Council website. We'll first proceed with voting to approve the filing zoning board minutes. April 29th, 2026, zoning presentation work session on ZB 1130M quarter square LLC. I move to approve the minutes of April 29th, 2026. My please have a second. Second. Ms. Berg, would you please call the vote? Chair Youngman. Yes. Ms. Rigby. Yes. Dr. Jones. Yes. Ms. Walsh. Yes. Okay, at the last zoning board meeting, uh, we discussed setting a procedure for addressing um disclosures. Um I I don't know that I suggested, but I think we all sort of suggested at disclosures be discussed at the initial administrative meetings. Um does anybody have any other comments on that? I do, Chair Young. Uh I think it's a good idea. Uh I think it is a criteria or a mandate actually set for by the state public ethics law. I'm probably reversing the words of of that code. Mr. Moore would remind you that that provision of the state code actually says that we're not to hear these cases more than 30 days before a complete disclosure has been made. So I think we certainly should be having this discussion in administrative meeting, and we should be verifying our compliance with that state code, and we should be scheduling the admin the actual evidentiary hearing no sooner than 30 days after those um disclosures are completed.