A lengthy and contentious meeting of the Huntington Beach City Council and its associated authorities focused on public comments, appointments, and a series of land use and finance items. The meeting included significant public testimony regarding election integrity, council conduct, and accessibility, followed by council deliberations on an affordable housing agreement amendment, parking fines, and future planning for the 2028 Olympics. A new City Treasurer was appointed and sworn in.
I would like to call the meeting of the city council public financing authority to order. Clerk may I have a roll call, please. Councilman Twiny. Councilman Kennedy. Here. Mayor Pro Tem McKeon. Here. Mayor Burns. Here. Councilwoman Bandermark. Here. Councilman Gruel? Here. Councilman Williams. All present. City Clerk, do we have uh any supplemental communications? Not for this portion of the meeting. All right. Do we have anybody signed up to speak? Yes. We have five people signed to speak for the closed session. Okay. Per decorum at the city council meetings is in proper decorum is at the city council meetings imperative for in order for the public to remain informed about issues pertaining to city's business. The public comments portion of the meeting is an opportunity for the public to be heard and address those issues in a public forum. Disruptive behavior impeding or delaying our ability to conduct the council's business will not be tolerated. Will be taken for violations of this law. At this time, the city council will receive comments from members of the public regarding any topic, including items in the closed session agenda. Individuals wishing to provide a comment on items may do so in person by filling out a request to speak form delivered to the city clerk. All speakers are encouraged but not required to identify themselves by names. Please note that the Brown Act does not allow discussion or action on topics that are not on the agenda. Members of the public who would like to speak directly with the council member on an item not on the agenda may consider scheduling an appointment by contacting City Council administrative assistant at 714-536-5553 or emailing the entire city council at city.council at SurfCity-HB.org. Um, call them all. When you're called to the podium, please use both podiums. Cheryl Freak, Linda Mortimer, George Aguirre, Kathleen Kathleen, and Michelle Morgan. Because we have such an extensive closed session, we will be given one minute piece, please. Uh good afternoon, City Council. I'm going to have critical information regarding our state's voter roles and voter history from the 2024 general election. This information comes from extensive research conducted by a team of data experts at Unite for Freedom, a nationwide nonpartisan volunteer organization. Their team meticulously analyzed official election files from both federal and state sources. While I am not an official spokesperson for Unite for Freedom, I am a dedicated volunteer who is deeply concerned by the findings. Findings that are based exclusively on official state election data, our analysis of the certified results from both the 2022 and 2024 general election reveals that not all votes counted were valid and accurate under the law. These findings are substantial and warrant careful consideration. They have already been shared with state election officials and law enforcement agencies and have been submitted as evidence in federal court as part of an ongoing litigation by Unite for Freedom and other parties. Unite for Freedom is not alone in raising these concerns. Next speaker, please. Resolution for a legally valid 2026 general election, whereas free and fair elections from form the cornerstone of the Republic of the United States, as stated in Reynolds versus Sims 377 US 533, 1964. The right of suffrage can be denied by a debasement or dilution of the weight of a citizen's vote just as effectively as by wholly prohibiting free exercise of the franchise. Whereas election officials bear the responsibility to ensure elections remain accurate and free from manipulation. In Ray Choi 127 U.S. 731 1888, the United States Supreme Court affirmed that election officials must strictly adhere to federal and state laws governing process defining election misconduct as follows.