Tue, Nov 4, 2025·Huntington Beach, California·City Council

Huntington Beach City Council & Public Financing Authority Meeting (2025-11-04)

Discussion Breakdown

Engineering And Infrastructure15%
Procedural14%
Technology and Innovation11%
Economic Development11%
Active Transportation9%
Fiscal Sustainability9%
Community Engagement6%
Planning and Zoning5%
Transportation Safety5%
Homelessness4%
Miscellaneous3%
Pending Litigation2%
Public Engagement2%
Parks and Recreation1%
Workforce Development1%
Public Safety1%
Youth Programs1%

Summary

Huntington Beach City Council & Public Financing Authority Meeting (2025-11-04)

The Council convened with a closed-session add-on related to newly issued appellate decisions, heard wide-ranging public comments (local governance/partisanship, homelessness services, and community giving initiatives), received a study session on Archer Aviation’s proposed FAA Advanced Air Mobility pilot-program partnership, and unanimously advanced multiple ordinances and policy items including updated building codes, e-bike enforcement tools, pedestrian/bike safety advocacy, and improved tracking of City real estate assets.

Closed Session

  • Urgent add-on (post-agenda): Council voted to add and recess to closed session to confer with legal counsel regarding a newly issued Court of Appeal decision in People and Bixby v. City of Huntington Beach (multiple case numbers cited).
  • Existing litigation: Conference with legal counsel regarding People of the State of California v. City of Huntington Beach (case number cited in the transcript).

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Ron DePlantis (resident; identified as “moderate independent”): Criticized what he described as increasing partisanship in local government and alleged City efforts on issues including voter ID, sanctuary laws, masks/vaccines, pride flags, and library policy were a misuse of local resources.
  • Jason Serafin (with daughter Hannah): Proposed installing public hydration/beverage kiosks (“HB Hydration Stations”) along the beach boardwalk/bike trail; requested guidance on permits and potential City partnership.
  • Charles Jackson (resident): Raised concern about partisan political activity occurring during “constitutional classes/education events,” citing an Oct. 15 instance involving advocacy related to “No on 50” and voter ID petitioning; requested future events avoid “flagrant violations of partisan politics.”
  • Heather Grode Jennings (resident): Expressed enthusiastic support for “Light the World Giving Machines” at the pier during the holiday season and described intended charitable beneficiaries.
  • Victor Kawa (resident; migrated from Peru): Supported the Giving Machines (third year in HB) and requested City help to promote the program (including signage on City buildings, if possible); also previewed an April 25 service day.
  • Nadia (advocate for unhoused individuals): Sought assistance for a 72-year-old unhoused man with serious medical issues; requested referral to non-congregate or otherwise suitable housing resources. Mayor directed her to provide contact info for follow-up by the homeless task force.
  • Sean (resident; former council candidate): Expressed approval of the courts stopping the City’s voter ID law; thanked certain councilmembers for a prior TEFRA vote related to homeless seniors and criticized others’ stated reasoning.
  • Amory Hanson: Spoke in support of Item 12 (pedestrian and cycling projects and funding advocacy).
  • Russell Neal: Spoke in support of the Council’s conflicts with the State, framing it as resisting overreach; encouraged Council to continue.
  • Eddie Osborne (resident): Requested a review of the oil spill settlement funds (stated Amplify settlement amount and date) and questioned how those funds relate to other City expenditures mentioned.
  • Additional speakers: One speaker provided a list of local food resources and encouraged community support; another speaker complained about speaker time limits and criticized police leadership.

Study Session: Archer Aviation eVTOL / FAA Advanced Air Mobility Integration Pilot Program

  • Presentation (George Cavork, Archer Aviation; Melissa McCaffrey, Archer policy/government affairs):
    • Described Archer as a California-based electric aircraft company (stated ~1,200 employees) and noted a Huntington Beach facility (stated 60,000 sq. ft.) for composites/fabrication.
    • Described aircraft attributes (as stated): piloted, 4 passengers + pilot, target ~100-mile range, ~150 mph top speed; “100 times quieter than a helicopter” and designed with redundancy; capable of gliding.
    • Discussed federal opportunity: an FAA-related Advanced Air Mobility program with a Dec. 11 submission deadline and up to five selections anticipated around March (as presented).
  • Council questions and themes:
    • Economic development/jobs: Archer stated manufacturing and operations could bring specialized jobs (maintenance, scheduling, pilots) and noted roots in HB.
    • Safety/regulatory: Questions on FAA testing/certification status, pilot certification pathway, redundancy, IMC capability, ADS-B, charging time, and fog/weather operations.
    • Infrastructure and cost: Council asked whether City funds would be required; presenters stated no City funding requirement for charging as described, while also discussing possible future models (co-investment/landing fees) depending on site.
    • Exclusivity: Council raised concerns about exclusive rights to landing pads/infrastructure; Archer indicated an exclusive initial relationship was the goal for early deployment, with the possibility of reevaluation later.
    • Next steps: Archer said the City would need to be the lead applicant, with Archer supporting; missing the deadline would mean missing this application opportunity.

Consent Calendar

  • Item 5 pulled: Memorandum of Understanding with the Art League of Huntington Beach was pulled by staff to return at a future date.
  • Approved unanimously (7-0): Consent items 4, 6, 8, 9.
  • Item 7 pulled for explanation; then approved (7-0): Payment of approximately $722,000 for a CalOptima-related voluntary reimbursement program was explained as generating an estimated $1.7 million return to the City (per staff explanation).

Discussion Items

  • Ordinance 4343 (Building/Construction Codes): Introduced and scheduled for public hearing Dec. 16, 2025; included repeal of Ordinances 4268 and 4270 and adoption by reference of the 2025 California Building Standards Codes (Title 24) with local amendments.
    • Staff described code adoption cycle and noted Huntington Beach review of amendments; Fire Department described local amendments including valet trash provisions and hydrant/supply connection provisions; staff noted CalFire mapping of a high fire hazard severity zone affecting Bolsa Chica area and referenced WUI code.
  • Ordinance 4344 (Bicycle regulations / e-bikes): Introduced amendments to HBMC 10.84 to expand enforcement authority for unsafe riding on sidewalks in business districts and near schools and other pedestrian-heavy areas; staff described education/outreach via school registration materials, trainings, and social media.
  • Item 12 (Council item—Pedestrian and bike safety advocacy): Councilmembers discussed advocating for pedestrian/cycling safety improvements, with emphasis on PCH and references to grant efforts and Caltrans corridor work.
  • Real estate holdings spreadsheet update (Council item): Council directed staff to continue developing a comprehensive, multi-tab spreadsheet inventorying and tracking City real estate assets and lease terms; staff credited Economic Development team members for the work.

Key Outcomes

  • Added urgent closed-session item re appellate decision and recessed to closed session: 7-0.
  • Consent calendar approvals: Items 4, 6, 8, 9 approved 7-0; Item 7 approved 7-0 after explanation; Item 5 pulled for later.
  • Ordinance 4343 introduced (Title 24/2025 model codes) + repeal of Ordinances 4268 & 4270; public hearing set for 12/16/2025: 7-0.
  • Ordinance 4344 introduced (bicycle/e-bike regulations): 7-0.
  • Council Item 12 (advocacy for pedestrian/cycling projects and funding, including PCH focus): 7-0.
  • Council direction to continue developing City real estate holdings/lease tracking spreadsheet and return with updates: 7-0.
  • Next regular meeting announced: Tuesday, Nov. 18, 2025.

Meeting Transcript

All right, I'd like to call the meeting of the City Council and Public Financing Authority to order, and no butch isn't here. And uh, but we'll have a roll call. Oh, there he is, showing a plate. Um, no one. Clerk, can we have a roll call, please? Councilman Twine? Here. Councilman Kennedy, here. Mayor Pratem McKeon. Here. Mayor Burns. Here. Councilwoman Vandermark. Councilman Gruul? Here. Councilman Williams? Here. All present. All right. Uh City Clerk, do we have any supplemental communications for this session? There are no supplemental communications for this portion of the meeting. Okay. Vig, you're on. Thanks, Mayor. So we have two items on tonight. One of them is a little bit unusual and doesn't happen very often, but on November 3rd, after posting posting of the agenda, the city received notice that the Court of Appeal issued a decision in the people and Bigsby versus City of Huntington Beach case number six oh six five five eight nine. I'm sorry, G065589 and G065461 G065499. Pursuant to government code section five four nine five four point two B. Council can take action on items of business not appearing on posted agenda following public identification of the item and upon a determination by two-thirds vote of the members of the city council present that there's need to take immediate action and the need to can to take action came after the posting of the agenda. So I'd ask uh that the mayor. I got the yep. Uh motion to based on the aforementioned facts and circumstances in pursuant to government code section five four nine five four point two b uh the city council determines that there is a need to take immediate action, and that the need for action came to the attention of the city council subsequent to the agenda being posted in two pursuant to government code five four nine five six point nine. The city council shall recess to close session to confer with the city council regarding the appellate opinion in the matter of people versus city of Huntington Beach, Court of Appeal number G065589, and uh Bixby versus City of Huntington Beach. Uh case number is numbers to them G065461 and G06549. I'll make the motion. Second. All right. May we have the call, please. Councilman Twiny? Yes. Councilman Kennedy? Yes. Mayor Protem McKeon? Yes. Mayor Burns. Aye. Councilwoman Vandermark. Yes. Councilman Gruel? Yes.