The Huntington Beach City Council met on December 16, 2025, for a regular meeting that included ceremonial items, public hearings, study sessions, and consent calendar approvals. The meeting began with an invocation, Pledge of Allegiance led by a veteran, and recognition of new businesses. The council addressed a resolution declaring September 18 as Colby IPA Day, approved a zoning amendment for a commercial development with a car wash, and discussed the potential co-location of the Huntington Beach International Surf Museum at the Main Street Library. Public comments covered a range of topics including the surf museum, traffic safety, and council actions.
So as soon as it's safe. I'd like to call the meeting of the City Council Public Financing Authority to order. City Clerk, may I have the roll call, please? Councilman Grohl? Here. Councilman Kennedy? Here. Mayor Pro Tempt Whiny. That mess you up, didn't it? Here. Mayor McKeon. Here. Councilman Burns. Here. Councilman Councilwoman Vandermark? Here. Councilman Williams. All present. City Clerk, do we have any supplemental communications? We have no supplemental communications for this portion of the meeting. Do we have any sign up to anyone signed up to speak on the closed session items? We have two people signed up to speak for the closed session items. Okay. The city council will now receive public comments for closed session only. When your name is called, please approach, use both podiums, state your name and organization for the record. Russ Neal and Tim Geddes. Mayor. Yes. Much time. Three. Three. Three minutes. Go ahead, Russ. So we're getting 30 minutes here. Three minutes, gentlemen. Oh, just okay, three. Uh, good evening, uh, mayor and city council members. My name is Russell Neal. I live in Huntington Beach. Uh, items five and six relate to our fight for control of our police force and our municipal elections. As a charter city under the California Constitution, Article Eleven, Section Five, Subsection B, these are our explicit and plenary powers. It comes as no surprise, however, that our state appeals court would act as the reliable goalkeepers for their party while ignoring the Constitution's plain language. This is the nature of a one party state. Neither can we expect the federal courts to swoop in and save us. Nor are we surprised that an element in our own city would cheer on this state despotism, just begging for the change. I, on the other hand, fully support the city's fight for our constitutional rights. Local control over local matters is an important feature of limited government, a bulwark against the consolidation of power in the central government, just as important as the separation of powers, and the same principle found in the federal nature of our U.S. Constitution. The time has come to combine the legal fight with a political one. Other cities, even Los Angeles, are beginning to see the danger of letting the state take total control of local matters.