Metropolitan Board of Zoning Appeals Division Two Meeting - February 10, 2026
Metropolitan Board of Zoning Appeals Division Two Meeting - February 10, 2026
The Metropolitan Board of Zoning Appeals Division Two convened on February 10, 2026, at 6:00 PM under the chairmanship of Craig Von Dalen. The board considered several continuances, withdrawals, expedited petitions, and three public hearings. Key decisions included granting variances for a storage building in Pike Township and a three-unit row house near Eastside, while denying a variance for large accessory buildings on Georgetown Road.
Consent Calendar
- Meeting minutes from January 13, 2026, were approved unanimously.
- A waiver of rules of procedure was approved to allow the board to vote on all expedited petitions and adopt findings of fact without additional testimony.
Public Comments & Testimony
- Jason Pogue (851 North Tacoma Avenue) addressed the board regarding petition 2025 UV2-017 (three-unit row house). He expressed support for affordable housing but argued that the requested variances were not justified by practical difficulties and would negatively impact the neighborhood. He requested denial or significant design changes.
Discussion Items
Special Requests and Continuances
- Petition 2025 UV2016 (withdrawal): The petitioner (Yadira Torres) withdrew the petition, retaining an existing 2002 variance. No opposition.
- Petition 2026 DV2001 (1781 Sloan Avenue): Continued to March 10, 2026, with additional notice after the petitioner agreed to add a variance. A neighbor, Julia Streer (1826 South De Quincy Street), had no objection.
- Petition 2025 UV2-018 (1003 West 30th Street): Withdrawn by petitioner George Gonzalez (4415 East Michigan Street) to refile as a rezoning. Staff recommended transferring the fees to the new petition. Approved unanimously.
- Petition 2026 UV2-001 (1927 North Capitol Avenue): Continued to March 10, 2026, due to petitioner absence. No opposition.
Expedited Petitions (Approved Unanimously)
- Case 2026-DV2-002 (5375 Graceland Avenue): Variance of development standards for a building addition with a 16-foot rear yard setback (20 feet required).
- Case 2025-DV3-036 amended (2065 Columbia Avenue): Variance for a freestanding building with a 29.5-foot southern transitional yard (40 feet required).
- Case 2026-UV2-002 (4560 Ocean Avenue): Variance of use to operate a bar and lounge within 25 feet of a protected district (100-foot separation required).
Public Hearing 1: Case 2025-DV1-061 (9000 Shetland Lane)
- Petitioner: David Gilman, representing Rebecca Bolton and David Padrick. Requested variances to construct an accessory storage building on a lot without a primary building and lacking street frontage. The property is a 7-acre wooded parcel adjacent to I-65, accessed via a private drive in Hendricks County. The petitioner argued the building would deter illegal dumping and trespassing. The Pike Township Residents Association (PTRA) submitted a letter of support with six commitments.
- Staff: Recommended denial, citing the property's isolated nature, lack of street frontage, and the ability to develop the site with a residence via an adjacent access parcel. Staff noted prior tree clearing and storage of recreational vehicles.
- Board Action: After questioning, the board granted the variance with the six PTRA commitments plus an additional staff-recommended commitment limiting access to the site via County Road 1071. Unanimous vote (5-0).
Public Hearing 2: Case 2025-DV2-045 (8083 Georgetown Road)
- Petitioner: Don Fisher (Insight Engineering) representing Raul Flores Diaz. Requested variances to construct two accessory buildings (4,000 sq ft and 2,591 sq ft) larger than the primary dwelling (1,860 sq ft), with one building in the front yard. The property is a 5.25-acre lot accessed via a shared gravel driveway. The petitioner stated the buildings would support a hobby farm (chickens, hydroponics, equipment storage).
- Remonstrators: Susan Blair (PTRA president) and John W. Boyer (neighbor) opposed. They presented evidence of commercial construction activity on the property, including dumpsters, commercial vehicles, and a framing business website. They argued the buildings would be used for business, not a hobby farm, and that the property lacks a legal easement. Letters from other neighbors also opposed.
- Staff: Recommended denial, citing the size of the buildings, lack of agricultural zoning, and concerns about commercial use. Staff noted a stop-work order for unauthorized construction and that the property can be used as zoned without variances.
- Board Action: The variance was denied by a 3-2 vote (Ducket Brown and Brandon voting yes; Duke, Von Dalen, and Barnes voting no).
Public Hearing 3: Case 2025-UV2-017 (853 North Tacoma Avenue)
- Petitioner: Joe Smoker (Near East Area Renewal). Requested a use variance for a three-unit row house (not permitted in D5) and development standard variances for a reduced main floor area (612 sq ft vs. 660 sq ft required), a 20-foot front building line (19.9 ft maximum), a 5-foot corner side yard setback (8 ft required), and deficient parking. The project is partially funded by CDBG and aims to provide affordable homeownership units. The neighborhood association and Councilor Brown supported the project.
- Remonstrator: Jason Pogue (851 North Tacoma Avenue) opposed, arguing the variances were not justified by practical difficulties, would increase street congestion, and reduce privacy. He suggested a less intense design could avoid variances.
- Staff: Recommended approval, noting the narrow lot, compatibility with surrounding development, and minimal deviations. Staff emphasized the project's alignment with the comprehensive plan and the lack of adverse impact.
- Board Action: The variance was granted unconditionally by a unanimous vote (5-0).
Key Outcomes
- Consent calendar: Minutes approved; waiver of rules approved.
- Withdrawals and continuances: Two petitions withdrawn (2025 UV2016, 2025 UV2-018); two continued to March 10, 2026 (2026 DV2001, 2026 UV2-001).
- Expedited petitions: All three granted unanimously.
- Case 2025-DV1-061 (9000 Shetland Lane): Variance granted with commitments (unanimous).
- Case 2025-DV2-045 (8083 Georgetown Road): Variance denied (3-2).
- Case 2025-UV2-017 (853 North Tacoma Avenue): Variance granted (unanimous).
Meeting Transcript
Well you need to ask too much. Well, that's good to know. Now that I don't work all time, I have no time. So I would like to see the trade. I know there's something who's the data. Oh, it's probably fine. That was the success story. Yeah. Now who do you think these people are? Yeah, I have a Robert Stock. Robert will come in as soon as I start. There's Robert. Right there. There's Robert. He made it. They'll overrun her is he will be here. Call the order. This is a public hearing of the Metropolitan Board of Zoning Appeals Division Two. I'm Craig Von Dalen, Chairperson of Division Two. The other board members present are Tom Barnes, Patricia Patrice Ducket Brown, James Duke, and Beth Brandon. Noah Stern, senior planner. Michael Weigel, senior planner. Marty Weistie, senior board specialist and secretary of the board. The board has copies of the zoning ordinance. The proceedings of this hearing are governed by the board's rules of procedure. The expedited cases will be heard immediately after all requests for continuances or withdrawals. Petitioners should be on your left and remonstrators on your right as you face the board. Those who testify will state their names and address for the record before beginning to testify. Statements and arguments in support of the petition. Remonstrators and persons appearing in opposition to the petition shall have a maximum of 15 minutes for the presentation of evidence. Statements and arguments in opposition to the petition. Staff will then present the administrators' comments regarding the petition. No further evidence, statements or arguments will be heard unless it is at the discretion of the board. Please limit your testimony and evidence to the matters covered in the statutory requirements, which must be met in order for the board to grant a variance. If the petitioners have failed to comply with all notice requirements as stipulated by the board's rules of procedure, including posting of the notice signed on a subject property at least 23 days prior to the hearing, the board may continue the petition. Anyone at this hearing who thinks complete and proper notice has not been given and would like the petition continue due to lack of proper notice, must bring this matter to the board's attention at the beginning of the hearing. The board may impose various conditions or commitments as amendments before reaching a decision on certain petitions. The installation of landscaping, the screening of a park parking area, and the dedication of rights of way are examples. These conditions and commitments are an integral part of the board's decision and must be met for a granted variance to be valid. Compliance with the conditions imposed by the board must be approved by an affidavit of compliance submitted by the petitioner within 30 days of completion. Unless otherwise specified an improvement location permit must be obtained prior to the establishment of the authorized improvements. Failure to comply with any conditions or commitments of a variance grant is a violation enforceable by the Department of Business and Neighborhood Services. A person may file a written request to receive notice of the filing of a petition for judicial review of a decision of the board. The written request must be filed within five days of the board's decision and must include the person's full name and correct mailing address and a reference to the board's petition number. Forms are available and may be obtained from the board secretary. Please be advised that contacting members of the board regarding a matter pending before the board outside of this public hearing process is prohibited. Please be courteous and orderly at all times, and please be sure all cell phone ringers are turned off. Board members, you've been provided meeting minutes for our December January 13th, 2026 meeting. If there are no deletions or additions, I will make a motion for their approval. Brandon, so moved.
openpublica.com