OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Target Growth Areas Workshop on Bill 2026-311 – June 9, 2026

City CouncilTuesday, June 9, 2026
BodyJacksonville, Florida
SessionCity Council
DateTuesday, June 9, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 22:42
Transcript — Verbatim
0:05

All right, it is now 306 p.m.

0:08

Uh, let's call this meeting to order.

0:10

This is a meeting, uh noticed meeting about the TGA target growth areas workshop uh concerning Bill 2026 311 uh and updates to the comp plan to identify target growth areas.

0:23

Uh first of all, I want to thank um the team that worked together.

0:27

This was a big group effort over months and months and months of working.

0:30

Thank you all for from planning and permitting and and the outside attorneys in the mayor's office, everyone.

0:37

This uh is really a comprehensive look, and let me again say something that I've talked to.

0:42

I know I got a call from one of uh someone from the media this morning about this particular legislation.

0:47

This is not the end.

0:49

This is the beginning framework of what it looks like to ensure um that this works for for our community and and what growth does.

0:57

So with that, uh, we will start this meeting and we'll have introductions to my rights.

1:04

And Rockman Johnson, district 14, and we'll make sure that this is uh being streamed so it will be shared with all the other members that aren't able to make it today.

1:12

Uh with that, I would like to have an overview of the uh, Ms.

1:17

Parola, if you could come up and give us an overview of what it is, and I know there's a presentation, so uh for those it should be on the screen so you just see thank you.

1:28

Um thank you.

1:30

Um what we have in front of you today is the target growth area map boundaries that we are proposing to be part of the conference of plan.

1:42

That's the actual legislation that's in front of you today.

1:45

But what I'm gonna give you is an overview of the entire project because there will be comp plan changes and later on zoning changes.

1:53

So I want to make sure you're aware of how this whole process worked.

1:57

Um, first of all, it starts with a committee that was formed in about 2023, and the committee was formed to look at um different issues that the city was facing, and those were our increased vulnerability to flood risk, um, the increase in population that was coming to the state, and the lack of um uh sufficient affordable housing.

2:21

So the committee was formed together.

2:23

That committee was um appointed by the mayor, and consisted of developers, attorneys, affordable housing advocates, a CPAC member, they were engineers, um, it was open to the public so the public could attend and offer comments, any of that, and it also had most of city staff able to answer any questions that they had, not only from the planning department but from development services and public works.

2:53

Um, the chair of that committee was Emily Pierce, and she is in the audience today, and um I'm sure she'd be happy to answer any questions as we go through this process.

3:02

So those are the three areas that the committee worked on for about a year and a half, and um we were looking to for a way to increase resilience to flood risk, increase housing opportunities, and while doing that, protect neighborhood character while accommodating growth.

3:20

Um, what the committee decided to do, they came up with recommendations that they knew could work for the goals of reducing flood risk, increasing housing.

3:30

Oh, I forgot.

3:33

Thank you.

3:34

And does it all okay and protecting neighborhood character?

3:38

I think we can go to the next one.

3:41

So the committee looked at an incentive-based approach to encourage residential growth.

3:48

This is all about residential growth and the appropriate areas, and they we identified this target growth area, which is the boundary you have on that map, where it's most suited to accommodate growth.

4:01

It's in the low flood risk areas, and that comes from the Office of Resilience with their compound flood model.

4:08

So it is least likely to flood, it's along transit corridors.

4:12

We high ridership transit corridors.

4:15

We worked with the KTA to make sure we were in appropriate areas, and also on the Emerald Trail within a half mile of those areas.

4:23

So we came up with this boundary, which would be most appropriate for increased residential growth because it has a walkability component, it can get to transit.

4:34

It's low flood risk, so it's a low risk of um developing in that area.

4:38

Um what that and at the same time we would be protecting neighborhood character because this area also removes a couple of things.

4:48

It does not include any zoning overlays.

4:50

Those zoning overlays, um, you've been through them at council.

4:54

They have their own set of guidelines, they have their own set of standards.

4:57

So it does not include zoning overlays, it does not include anything in the low density residential districts.

4:59

So anything that is in low density residential LDR land use that is not included in this boundary.

5:10

It also does not include anything that's in an accident potential zone for an airport.

5:16

So that's how we developed the boundary for the target growth.

5:23

And you can see that on the screen right there: the pink and the yellow.

5:27

The pink and the yellow, what that identifies is if it's in the urban priority area or the urban area.

5:34

That was another factor we used.

5:36

The urban and urban priority areas are already formulated in the comprehensive plan, and they are areas that the city policy-wise would look forward to revitalizing an infill, just like we're trying to do here today.

5:51

So that's the overall map.

5:53

We presented to all the CPACs.

5:55

So what you're going to see here are the different CPACs districts, the planning districts, and how much of this target growth area is in those areas.

6:06

But remember, it does not include low density residential.

6:09

So in any of those areas, your single-family neighborhoods are protected.

6:14

The incentives.

8:07

More permeable surfaces, more landscaping that manages stormwater, capturing rainfall on site, on site renewable energy.

8:20

What this doesn't do, it does not apply to all neighborhoods, it only applies to that boundary identified on your map.

8:29

And right now it does not infringe on single-family neighborhoods.

8:33

Right now we're in the comprehensive plan amendment portion of this overall plan.

8:39

So the only thing that is part of ordinance 2026 311 that's in front of council today is the actual target growth map, the boundaries of that map, and establishing the target growth area within the comp plan and the allowance for an increase in density if you were to take advantage of those incentives.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Zoning And Land Use█████████████████████████████████████████████66%
Affordable Housing███████████████████████34%
Summary of Proceedings

Target Growth Areas Workshop on Bill 2026-311 – June 9, 2026

The Jacksonville City Council held a noticed workshop on June 9, 2026, from 3:06 PM to 3:29 PM, to discuss proposed Target Growth Areas (TGA) under Bill 2026-311 and updates to the comprehensive plan. The meeting, chaired by Councilman Johnson (District 14), featured a presentation by planning staff and the chair of the Livable Density and Resilience (LDR) Update Committee, outlining a multi-year process to encourage residential growth in low-flood-risk, transit-served areas while protecting neighborhoods and increasing affordable housing.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Ruth Nelson Peoples (resident): Expressed confusion about the incentive process and asked who decides the incentives (which she referred to as variances). She requested a copy of the incentive page. Staff clarified that the specific incentives will be determined in later public hearings as part of the zoning code changes.

Discussion Items

  • Staff Presentation (Helena Parola): Described the TGA boundaries (pink and yellow on map) based on low flood risk (compound flood model), high-ridership transit corridors (with JTA), and within half a mile of the Emerald Trail. Excluded areas: zoning overlays, low-density residential (LDR) land use, and accident potential zones. The incentives for density include resilient design standards (e.g., permeable surfaces, stormwater management, on-site renewable energy) or affordable housing (rental at 100% AMI, home ownership at 120% AMI). The current legislation (Ordinance 2026-311) only establishes the TGA map in the comp plan and allows density increases; specific zoning code changes will follow state review.
  • Emily Pierce (LDR Update Committee Chair): Added historical context—the effort began 10 years ago with an Adaptation Action Area Group that led to the city's compound flood model, now used by the Army Corps. She highlighted statistics: a renter needs at least $25/hour to afford a basic two-bedroom apartment; over half of low-income renters (defined as 80% of Area Median Income, which she estimated near $200,000) spend over 50% of their income on housing. She noted that firefighters, police, and teachers are considered low income. Resounding support was reported from the Chamber of Commerce, NEFPA, and CPACs (including a standing ovation at one CPAC meeting). The committee ran financial models with builders and developers to confirm the incentives would make a meaningful difference.
  • Councilman Johnson: Questioned affordability thresholds, expressing concern that builders might price units beyond reach despite incentives. He clarified that the current proposal sets 100% AMI for rentals and 120% AMI for home ownership (to be finalized in zoning code). He advocated for moving the needle toward home ownership over rental. Staff explained that developers can choose either resilient design standards or affordable housing (or both) to qualify for density increases.

Key Outcomes

  • No formal votes were taken; the workshop was informational. The next step is the comp plan amendment (Ordinance 2026-311) will be sent to the state for comment, after which the council will consider a second ordinance with the same comp plan changes but a different number, along with the detailed zoning code changes that will specify incentives and affordable housing requirements. Staff committed to providing council members with TGA map breakdowns by council district.

Note: The meeting was adjourned at 3:29 PM. No agenda or minutes were available for this meeting.

Meeting Transcript

All right, it is now 306 p.m. Uh, let's call this meeting to order. This is a meeting, uh noticed meeting about the TGA target growth areas workshop uh concerning Bill 2026 311 uh and updates to the comp plan to identify target growth areas. Uh first of all, I want to thank um the team that worked together. This was a big group effort over months and months and months of working. Thank you all for from planning and permitting and and the outside attorneys in the mayor's office, everyone. This uh is really a comprehensive look, and let me again say something that I've talked to. I know I got a call from one of uh someone from the media this morning about this particular legislation. This is not the end. This is the beginning framework of what it looks like to ensure um that this works for for our community and and what growth does. So with that, uh, we will start this meeting and we'll have introductions to my rights. And Rockman Johnson, district 14, and we'll make sure that this is uh being streamed so it will be shared with all the other members that aren't able to make it today. Uh with that, I would like to have an overview of the uh, Ms. Parola, if you could come up and give us an overview of what it is, and I know there's a presentation, so uh for those it should be on the screen so you just see thank you. Um thank you. Um what we have in front of you today is the target growth area map boundaries that we are proposing to be part of the conference of plan. That's the actual legislation that's in front of you today. But what I'm gonna give you is an overview of the entire project because there will be comp plan changes and later on zoning changes. So I want to make sure you're aware of how this whole process worked. Um, first of all, it starts with a committee that was formed in about 2023, and the committee was formed to look at um different issues that the city was facing, and those were our increased vulnerability to flood risk, um, the increase in population that was coming to the state, and the lack of um uh sufficient affordable housing. So the committee was formed together. That committee was um appointed by the mayor, and consisted of developers, attorneys, affordable housing advocates, a CPAC member, they were engineers, um, it was open to the public so the public could attend and offer comments, any of that, and it also had most of city staff able to answer any questions that they had, not only from the planning department but from development services and public works. Um, the chair of that committee was Emily Pierce, and she is in the audience today, and um I'm sure she'd be happy to answer any questions as we go through this process. So those are the three areas that the committee worked on for about a year and a half, and um we were looking to for a way to increase resilience to flood risk, increase housing opportunities, and while doing that, protect neighborhood character while accommodating growth. Um, what the committee decided to do, they came up with recommendations that they knew could work for the goals of reducing flood risk, increasing housing. Oh, I forgot. Thank you. And does it all okay and protecting neighborhood character? I think we can go to the next one. So the committee looked at an incentive-based approach to encourage residential growth. This is all about residential growth and the appropriate areas, and they we identified this target growth area, which is the boundary you have on that map, where it's most suited to accommodate growth. It's in the low flood risk areas, and that comes from the Office of Resilience with their compound flood model. So it is least likely to flood, it's along transit corridors. We high ridership transit corridors. We worked with the KTA to make sure we were in appropriate areas, and also on the Emerald Trail within a half mile of those areas. So we came up with this boundary, which would be most appropriate for increased residential growth because it has a walkability component, it can get to transit. It's low flood risk, so it's a low risk of um developing in that area. Um what that and at the same time we would be protecting neighborhood character because this area also removes a couple of things. It does not include any zoning overlays. Those zoning overlays, um, you've been through them at council. They have their own set of guidelines, they have their own set of standards. So it does not include zoning overlays, it does not include anything in the low density residential districts. So anything that is in low density residential LDR land use that is not included in this boundary. It also does not include anything that's in an accident potential zone for an airport. So that's how we developed the boundary for the target growth. And you can see that on the screen right there: the pink and the yellow. The pink and the yellow, what that identifies is if it's in the urban priority area or the urban area. That was another factor we used. The urban and urban priority areas are already formulated in the comprehensive plan, and they are areas that the city policy-wise would look forward to revitalizing an infill, just like we're trying to do here today. So that's the overall map.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com