A work session of the Johns Creek City Council was held on September 8, 2025, at 5:00 PM. The council discussed the FY26 budget, construction bids for the Barnwell Road corridor improvements, and a parking lot expansion at Cauley Creek Park. No public comments were received. The meeting adjourned to executive session.
Mayor, we're recording. Okay. I would like to recall this meeting of the Johns Creek City Council to order the September 8th, 2025 at 5 p.m. Would you lead us in the pledge? Happy to pledge allegiance. Under God. Next time. Mayor's remarks. Without any strategic priorities, we're moving to ongoing projects with the fiscal year 26 budget discussion with Assistant City Manager Love for discussion. Good afternoon, Mayor and Council. The memo for this afternoon's work session regarding the proposed budget is allocation of projected FY 2025 surplus. In the memo, it lays out uh how we got here with some of the adjustments that have been made to the proposed budget leading up to this, the most recent one from the August 25th work session related to the assumption of the property tax uh digest growth. So the budget document that you received is balanced. And then there is a placeholder there for there's a $4 million placeholder, and it is just that a placeholder. Um should the council decide to allocate some of the projected FY 2025 surplus in as part of the FY26 budget. In your memo, there are several projects or initiatives that have been mentioned in previous work sessions by one or more council members. That is a suggestion for consideration of that funding. Mr. Mayor, I don't know if you want us to go down through that list or just uh around the table for um the input from council, however you would like us to proceed. Can I ask someone? So I was looking at the list. I was really considering it in this may be a interesting idea. So uh you can surely say it's a bad one if you want to. Um but I think um, you know, we it's not a requirement that we have to spend the surplus. And right rather than try to divvy up uh these projects now. We could put it to unassigned uh reserves and then uh have that as something that we look at the retreat um and make you know six figures on the interest from that surplus until then to uh let staff uh make sure they can implement all the projects and and things like that. So it's not a requirement that we expend it. We could push it to the investment policy, keep it there for five, six months uh through the investment policy, make a hundred grand on it, and then figure how to expend it. So just the thought. But I think it's a good one. But Chris, that's I think that's what the staff is suggesting, right? Yeah. Put it in the contingency. So not like last year, like we come back and assign it and if the number changes. We still got two more months to get that real actual number. So I would rather just park it in that contingency like the staff is suggesting. When we wrote know the exact like real number, probably that's when or like you said. That's a good place. When strategic like meeting in uh January, that's when we can come back and say, okay, here is what we need to assign it. So I like that approach. Yeah, and then we at that point we'll know uh either moving forward with the PAC or not, and then we can really decide some of those big dollars. And also we will know the exact dollar amount in stuff like last year they had to come back and make another amendment to adjust it. So I would rather just not assign it and just put it in the projects capital projects contingency and then. So let me but one project for sure I want to we don't need to assign a dollar amount, but uh strongwater grant, because it's pretty successful this year, so we should definitely have some assigned to it. Probably like we can talk about it back when we allocate to the project. So right now I want like staff that you said put under capital projects contingency. And we know the exact dollar amount. That's not what Chris was recommending, right? You were saying putting it in the general. So is there any any particular item here on this list that have critical dates that we either have to fund or we miss?