The Johns Creek City Council held a work session on August 24, 2026, at 5:02 PM to discuss the FY 2027 proposed budget (third of three budget discussions), a proposed amendment to the budget policy for year-end surplus allocation, and the monument signage for the Town Center. Council members reviewed capital project priorities, debated surplus allocation mechanisms, and provided direction on monument design, location, and color scheme.
Council members expressed their updated positions on a variety of capital projects and enhancements. Key points:
Councilmember Coughlin expressed frustration with the lack of consensus on a unified CIP and suggested passing the budget as presented with an asterisk on stormwater items for future work sessions.
Staff proposed a revision to the budget policy for allocating year-end surplus. Currently, the surplus is distributed across four categories: unassigned fund balance (60%), infrastructure maintenance accrual (15%), capital projects (15%), and property tax stabilization (10%). Two alternatives were presented: allocate 100% to capital projects fund, or 100% to unassigned fund balance.
Councilmember Aaron Ross Powell supported capital projects fund to maintain discipline with the CIP. Councilmember Bob supported unassigned fund balance for clarity, but wanted accruals filled first. Councilmember Chris supported unassigned fund balance for flexibility. Councilmember Stacey initially supported capital projects but later agreed to unassigned fund balance. Councilmember Larry supported unassigned fund balance. Councilmember Coughlin wanted to keep the current policy but noted the lack of adherence. After debate, Councilmember Iranley became the fourth vote for unassigned fund balance, achieving consensus.
Mayor Andrew Grey presented monument sign options for the Town Center, funded with tourism product development dollars. Council gave direction on location and color scheme.
Thank you, Mayor. We are recording. Okay. I would like to call this meeting of the Johns Creek City Council to order this August 24th at 502 p.m. Thank you. Wouldn't you lead the pledge? Sure. I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America. And to the Republic. Mayor's remarks? None, thank you. Thank you. We're going straight into strategic priorities or budget discussion. We have Director Hoore for presentation. I think you're here for mainly the questions. Yes. Director? So let me just say wow, and that seems really loud today. So last meeting we didn't have delEAP. And we had not heard from Stacey. What we need to do to continue to get closer and closer to something that we can vote on is rather than us going through and everything that you may like about the budget or whatever. Unless something is changed. If you have a new opinion about one of the items, I think that we can move on. So I'll just say that like for myself, I'm good with everything as it stood as of the last meeting, uh except uh on the senior services uh idea. Uh I think Larry brought that up originally. Uh I do think that there is something that we probably can do, should do. Uh I'm gonna let Larry speak to that when it's your term, but I'm open to doing something there. Um I know that the comp plan and the uh stormwater improvements were the two items that we had either close to a majority or a majority that had voice, probably not in one single meeting, but over the two or three meetings uh that they were in support of doing something additionally in those areas. Uh I am also for that, uh, but I would wait until the surplus and keep the budget as it's currently constituted. And uh with that mayor comp plan and what was the other one? The uh stormwater improvements. Okay. I think those are the only two that we had uh consensus to do something additional. But with that, I'll just uh we'll go around the horn. Aaron Ross Powell Oh, number 27. Yes. Okay. Um I don't have any changes. My one clarification on my position on the comp plan update is that I believe that we would be able to fund that priority using the budget reconciliation as we close out the year. And so for fiscal year 26. And uh my understanding was so long as staff heard consensus of council that that was a priority, they would be able to manage the RFP and a budget amendment would be able to hit in a timely manner for that to be funded. All right, thank you, Mayor. Um good with uh revenue projections and projects like 1 to 14 strongwater grant like the continue because we started last year and it's a unique program for Johns Creek that no other city done it, so we are definitely on track, and I will just leave it the way it is and revisit if needed midway into the fiscal year. So dredging, like I want to keep that demo so that staff can come back and work on the structure to see uh what needs to be done. So can you tell us where you are on you know CLUP on stormwater improvements, or if there's anything that's changed since you've opined the number 15 that comp plan update? I'm definitely on for that. And like uh staff suggested in the prior meetings. It's we can go back for the RFP with the add-on. Right, Kimberly correct me if I'm wrong. Like yes, the budget number, we could leave it the amount the way it is, but it depends upon the add-on, like the cost.