OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Kansas City Council Meeting: Vacant Land Activation & Parks Audit (May 21, 2026)

City Council Business SessionThursday, May 21, 2026
BodyKansas City, Missouri
SessionCity Council Business Session
DateThursday, May 21, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 1:30:45
Transcript — Verbatim
0:00

The meeting will come to order.

0:02

Our first item is approval of the minutes from business session of May 7.

0:06

Is there a motion?

0:08

So second.

0:09

Moved and second.

0:10

All in favor of approving the minutes from last time say aye.

0:13

Aye.

0:13

All opposed?

0:14

Motion passes.

0:15

Our first topic today is vacant land activation initiative.

0:21

Let's go.

0:36

All right.

0:37

Good afternoon, Mayor, City Council, City Manager.

0:41

Andy Setzum, Deputy Director for Neighborhood Services Department, and I'm here with Mary Owens, Deputy Director for the Housing Department.

0:53

Just speak.

0:55

And I'm Gunnar Hand, the executive director of the land bank in Kansas City, Missouri in the housing and community development department.

1:02

Okay.

1:02

So the purpose today is for us to present the vacant land activation initiative strategic plan.

1:10

And our hopes from project team is for uh council to review the plan and endorse the plan via resolution for adoption.

1:20

So some background on this.

1:22

The as a reminder, resolution 250396 was passed in May of last year, directing the city manager to develop policy recommendations to activate vacant land through both administrative and legislative approaches.

1:38

The resolution spelled out various short term, medium, and long-term deliverables, of which the strategic plan was one of the medium-term deliverables.

1:48

Now, one of the requirements of the resolution was also engaging the community.

1:52

And through a variety of methods, whether they were virtual meetings, community meetings, and/or use of the online speakeasy platform, we engage with over 50 organizations representing nonprofits, neighborhoods, and developers, to name a few, besides just activating or discussing with the external stakeholders for internal staff.

2:28

Now, what we have in this plan is actions, uh policy considerations, a budget, financial options for consideration, uh some of these things we'll discuss in the uh further part of the presentation.

2:45

Now, when we're talking about vacant lots, we're talking about 16,000 parcels, and that reference that represents about 8% of the total parcels in the limits of Kansas City.

2:56

Of the 16,000, 80% of those are privately held parcels, and of the 16,000, only about 14% of those have structures on those.

3:08

Now, where are these parcels located?

3:11

Well, if you look at the 16,000, we have about 90% of those are located within districts three, four, and five.

3:18

And unfortunately, district three carries the burden at about 60% of those vacant parcels.

3:26

Now, as you can imagine, there's a variety of different activation challenges, and we certainly don't expect all these parcels to be uh able to be activated based on various requirements.

3:36

But there are certainly several challenges to overcome.

3:39

Uh, one of those, of course, being environmental.

3:42

Uh, through some uh work going on now, we can expect somewhere around 50% of those vacant parcels to have some level of contamination related to lead andor other heavy metals.

3:53

Uh, carry that forward to remediation costs that can range anywhere from 30 to 60,000 per parcel.

4:00

Uh so besides the environmental, you also have location issues in terms of marketability, you've got the size of the lot, you could be grading issues, uh, and others uh to to contend with.

4:14

So I'm gonna get into some of the details of our strategic plan.

4:18

Um, but before I do, I wanted to acknowledge the wonderful staff that really were instrumental in putting this plan together.

4:24

Uh Samantha Bradfield, Morgan Pemberton, Casey Ice, and Annalissa Taylor.

4:29

Um, they did a phenomenal job.

4:32

Um, so in structuring the plan, uh, we really focused on the systemic vacancy cycle.

4:38

Uh, the systemic vacancy cycle illustrates how vacant properties are not isolated issues, but a self-reinforcing cycle that impacts entire neighborhoods.

4:47

And the way it works is when vacancy occurs, a property will become vacant, and property deterioration typically follows.

4:56

Uh, without maintenance, the property declines physically, and this impacts neighborhoods and the surrounding property values decline.

5:03

Um, as investment slows, uh, it also reduces market interest and developers and buyers start to avoid the area.

5:12

Increased concentration of vacancy happens once the market dries up and more properties become vacant, repeating the cycle.

5:20

When we develop this strategic plan, our goal was to address every stage of the cycle.

5:27

And it's important to note that private market alone cannot solve concentrated vacancy.

5:32

It requires active government intervention.

5:36

So in developing the plan, we have five priorities.

5:41

These priorities target activation areas, assemble land, increase accountability, greening properties, and building partnerships are the foundation of the plan.

5:51

Umsing the priorities just discussed, we are approaching vacancy through this full life cycle strategy.

5:58

These strategies work together as a system by improving how we identify, prevent, stabilize, and activate properties, we create a more effective and scalable approach.

6:10

This slide provides an overview of the strategic plan, and it is organized by strategic best practices and objectives that will have the most impact in changing the vacancy cycle.

6:21

Um it's important to note that most of the city's vacant land is in the third stabilization stage, highlighting the need for ongoing maintenance and strategic next steps toward activation.

6:36

Okay.

6:37

Uh again, Cunner Hand, the executive director of the land bank of Kansas City, Missouri.

6:41

Uh, my section, I'm gonna quickly go over how we're gonna apply these strategies through an like a high level example.

6:48

Um, so while this plan uh made the determination and did an analysis to come up with around approximately 16,000 vacant parcels in the city, of which again the land bank and homesteading authority control about a quarter or 3,500 of those.

7:04

We still uh haven't put eyes on all those parcels with this process and this strategy in mind.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Affordable Housing█████████████████████████████████33%
Miscellaneous████████████████████████████████32%
Housing and Community Development███████████████15%
Parks and Recreation████████████12%
Engineering And Infrastructure████4%
Racial Equity██2%
Fiscal Sustainability██2%
Summary of Proceedings

Kansas City Council Meeting: Vacant Land Activation & Parks Audit (May 21, 2026)

The Kansas City Council met on May 21, 2026, to receive and discuss two major agenda items: the Vacant Land Activation Initiative strategic plan and the City Auditor's report on the Parks and Recreation Department. The meeting began with approval of the previous meeting's minutes.

Consent Calendar

  • Unanimously approved the minutes from the business session of May 7, 2026.

Discussion Items

Vacant Land Activation Initiative Strategic Plan

City staff presented a strategic plan developed in response to Resolution 250396 (passed May 2025). The plan addresses approximately 16,000 vacant parcels (about 8% of total parcels in Kansas City). Key facts included:

  • 80% of vacant parcels are privately held.
  • Only about 14% of vacant parcels have structures.
  • 90% of vacant parcels are located in Council Districts 3, 4, and 5; District 3 contains about 60%.
  • About 50% of vacant parcels are expected to have some level of contamination (lead/heavy metals), with remediation costs ranging from $30,000 to $60,000 per parcel.

The plan outlines five priorities: targeting activation areas, assembling land, increasing accountability, greening properties, and building partnerships. Staff recommended establishing or partnering with a housing development corporation to develop properties the private market is unlikely to address. A proposed budget of $10 million per year was presented, covering staffing, software, environmental assessments, quiet title work, and property remediation. Potential funding sources include a HUD Section 108 loan (up to $35 million in credit), a vacant registry fee, and private/philanthropic partners.

Councilmembers voiced support for the plan but raised concerns about past city housing development failures, the need for a developer mindset in any new housing corporation, and the importance of focusing on the most blighted areas and residents ("inside out" development). Councilmember Patterson Hasley urged that priority projects be identified in advance and that mixed-income housing (60% to 120% AMI) be required. Councilmember Curls emphasized the need to address out-of-state landowners and ensure equitable distribution of resources across all districts.

City Auditor's Report on Parks and Recreation Department

City Auditor Mark Shaw presented findings from an audit evaluating financial controls, fee policies, and facility use agreements in the Parks and Recreation Department. Three key findings were:

  1. Weak Financial Controls: Department leadership reported an inaccurate FY 2026 budget figure ($33 million vs. actual >$100 million). The department is in the top quarter of best-funded parks departments per capita among large U.S. cities, yet leadership cited insufficient budgets. The deferred maintenance backlog estimates ranged from $80 million to $400 million. Roles and responsibilities in the finance division were unclear, leading to accounting inaccuracies and unreconciled transactions.
  2. Inconsistent Fee Practices: Youth entry fees were imposed at community centers, but cost recovery was lower (FY 2025: $1.5 million total fees from community centers, or 2.6% of total revenues of $58.7 million) than before the fees were imposed (FY 2019: $1.7 million). The audit stated the fees may have disproportionately affected lower-income communities. Facility use agreements deviated from established fee schedules with no systematic tracking of cost recovery.
  3. Insufficient Oversight of Facility Use Agreements: The department re-entered agreements with partners that had repeated violations and unauthorized activities. An adult softball league operated under a youth-only agreement, characterized as a "rogue league" by leadership. Fee splits varied inconsistently (e.g., 15/85 vs. 40/60). In one case, a partner received a 25% reduction in owed revenue and waived maintenance fees, while subleasing facilities and retaining additional revenue. Leadership acknowledged the department "could have missed collecting millions of dollars."

Parks and Recreation Director Cotton responded, defending the department's national accreditation and financial management. He disputed several audit claims, stating that youth fees were approved by the park board, that the department has been working to improve financial practices for years, and that there is no missing money or embezzlement.

Councilmembers expressed strong interest in further discussion. Councilmember Patterson Hasley defended the auditor's role, calling the director's engagement "completely inappropriate." Councilmember Robinson apologized to the auditor for personal attacks. Councilmember Duncan noted the "egregious" financial issues and requested the Parks Board Chair be present at a future session. Councilmember Ray asked for clarity on the definition of "fraud" used in the audit. It was agreed to revisit the audit at a future business session (tentatively July 11, 2026), with a written response from the Parks Board due by June 4, 2026.

Key Outcomes

  • The Vacant Land Activation Initiative strategic plan was presented for council consideration; no formal vote was taken, but staff requested council endorsement via resolution.
  • The council tentatively scheduled a follow-up business session for July 11, 2026, to further discuss the Parks and Recreation audit. The Parks Board Chair will be invited, and a written response from the Parks Board is requested by June 4, 2026.

Meeting Transcript

The meeting will come to order. Our first item is approval of the minutes from business session of May 7. Is there a motion? So second. Moved and second. All in favor of approving the minutes from last time say aye. Aye. All opposed? Motion passes. Our first topic today is vacant land activation initiative. Let's go. All right. Good afternoon, Mayor, City Council, City Manager. Andy Setzum, Deputy Director for Neighborhood Services Department, and I'm here with Mary Owens, Deputy Director for the Housing Department. Just speak. And I'm Gunnar Hand, the executive director of the land bank in Kansas City, Missouri in the housing and community development department. Okay. So the purpose today is for us to present the vacant land activation initiative strategic plan. And our hopes from project team is for uh council to review the plan and endorse the plan via resolution for adoption. So some background on this. The as a reminder, resolution 250396 was passed in May of last year, directing the city manager to develop policy recommendations to activate vacant land through both administrative and legislative approaches. The resolution spelled out various short term, medium, and long-term deliverables, of which the strategic plan was one of the medium-term deliverables. Now, one of the requirements of the resolution was also engaging the community. And through a variety of methods, whether they were virtual meetings, community meetings, and/or use of the online speakeasy platform, we engage with over 50 organizations representing nonprofits, neighborhoods, and developers, to name a few, besides just activating or discussing with the external stakeholders for internal staff. Now, what we have in this plan is actions, uh policy considerations, a budget, financial options for consideration, uh some of these things we'll discuss in the uh further part of the presentation. Now, when we're talking about vacant lots, we're talking about 16,000 parcels, and that reference that represents about 8% of the total parcels in the limits of Kansas City. Of the 16,000, 80% of those are privately held parcels, and of the 16,000, only about 14% of those have structures on those. Now, where are these parcels located? Well, if you look at the 16,000, we have about 90% of those are located within districts three, four, and five. And unfortunately, district three carries the burden at about 60% of those vacant parcels. Now, as you can imagine, there's a variety of different activation challenges, and we certainly don't expect all these parcels to be uh able to be activated based on various requirements. But there are certainly several challenges to overcome. Uh, one of those, of course, being environmental. Uh, through some uh work going on now, we can expect somewhere around 50% of those vacant parcels to have some level of contamination related to lead andor other heavy metals. Uh, carry that forward to remediation costs that can range anywhere from 30 to 60,000 per parcel. Uh so besides the environmental, you also have location issues in terms of marketability, you've got the size of the lot, you could be grading issues, uh, and others uh to to contend with. So I'm gonna get into some of the details of our strategic plan. Um, but before I do, I wanted to acknowledge the wonderful staff that really were instrumental in putting this plan together. Uh Samantha Bradfield, Morgan Pemberton, Casey Ice, and Annalissa Taylor. Um, they did a phenomenal job. Um, so in structuring the plan, uh, we really focused on the systemic vacancy cycle. Uh, the systemic vacancy cycle illustrates how vacant properties are not isolated issues, but a self-reinforcing cycle that impacts entire neighborhoods. And the way it works is when vacancy occurs, a property will become vacant, and property deterioration typically follows. Uh, without maintenance, the property declines physically, and this impacts neighborhoods and the surrounding property values decline. Um, as investment slows, uh, it also reduces market interest and developers and buyers start to avoid the area. Increased concentration of vacancy happens once the market dries up and more properties become vacant, repeating the cycle. When we develop this strategic plan, our goal was to address every stage of the cycle. And it's important to note that private market alone cannot solve concentrated vacancy. It requires active government intervention. So in developing the plan, we have five priorities.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com