The Planning Commission and its Subdivision Committee met on January 14, 2025, at the Lihu‘e Civic Center. The Subdivision Committee met at 8:00 AM to review several subdivision applications, extensions, and a recertification. The full Planning Commission convened at 9:00 AM to elect officers, approve subdivision committee appointments, and act on zoning permits, use permits, a general plan amendment, and an appeal of a notice of violation.
Recording in progress. We get our roll off. Oh, here. Excuse Chair DeGrassian. Here. Your call, Mr. Chair. The department has no recommended changes to the agenda. Move to approve the agenda. Okay. Motion on the clouds to approve the agenda. Still a voice vote. All in favor say aye. I both very. We have no new minutes or see the vital store record or this business moving on the agenda item G one. So don't make subdivision. Family trust at all proposed to law boundary adjustments, TF2, those three-018 and 015 and 036. Okay, the callhill would be we don't have even signed up. Um supervisor reporting the record of the post-development redefines the boundaries between two parcels identified as TMKs 2318, parcels 15 and 36. Currently, parcel 15 contains approximately 3.143 acres and is situated within the county agriculture and open zoning districts and state that use agricultural district. Parcel 36 contains approximately 0.96 acres situated within the council residential or four zoning district and state 2 serving district. During the initial review of the subdivision proposal, do the department could not definitively determine that parcels 15 and 36 were lots of recording. However, in 1970, parcel 24 was dropped and subsequently became parcels 15 and 36. And considering this, since tax parcels are prevalently intended for taxation purposes, the department could not confirm the subject parcels as lots of records on this documentation was provided that indicated the parcels to meet the definition of law as prescribed in section 8 test 1.5 of the comprehensive zoning arguments. Consequently, the department requested a preliminary subdivision map approval for this application because updated two phases. Part one required the applicant to submit a recorded subdivision map and confirming that parcels 15 and 36 are recognized as lots of record. This requirement is detailed in condition one eight of the tentative approval letter for the subject subdivision application data June 5th, 2024. Part two of the approval including compliance with all agencies conditions would proceed upon receipt of the necessary documentation in accordance with the department's request on 24th 2024. The quiet planning commission granted part one of the preliminary subdivision map approvals of this application. The findings indicated that these boundaries were established through subdivision number six, also known as the Noise Subdivision that was approved by the Council Coin Works of the First Research 1956. Based on this information, the department has determined that parcels 15 and 36 are lots of records. Good morning. Good morning, Commission. Here presenting the owners. So it's just adjusting the boundaries between those lines. Look forward to working with the area departments to get the subdivision finalized. Thank you. Any questions for um there's no further questions seeking a motion move to approve subdivision application number yes as 2024-9 involving two lot boundary adjustments second motion on the boards for approval of this tentative application? Could you get a role called Mr. Crock? Roll call, Mr. Chair and Commissioner Cole. Hi, Chair De Gosper. Hi. The definition of a lot hardcore ambassador is a uh unit law record establishment subdivision action. As Kenny's gone through some of these separate requests and looking in the history of property rights and establishment of lots, um, there appear to be some historical cases that prior to the existence of the planning commission and the formal subdivision process, individual property units that would essentially equate in this situation like the board of supervisor taking action that created a lot of record, but remains somewhat in limbo because of not possibly matching up with the hard and fast definition of a lot of record under the quietonic code. So we're looking at to be able to clean that up, propose an amendment to the conference of zoning orders of submit orders, whereby a lot of record can also include actions such as license when the board of supervisors took action on it. So it should help clear a lot of these property issues up that exist that I don't see our frequent thing across Kennedy's desk, but occur and and some families are kind of left in the lurch because of somewhat nebulous or not quite um adequate definitions of model records. So this is one case we can't be able to find enough evidence that was so far working clearly established. This was intended to be a separate property and parcel.