I'll call the uh meeting to order the clean planning and zoning commission meeting for January twenty-seventh, two thousand twenty-five.

Let the record show that all commissioners are present except Commissioner uh Ellis, Commissioner Rowe, and Commissioner Sabri.

Um is present.

Uh first item on the agenda is the consider the approval of the regular meeting of the clean planning zoning commission meeting for January 27th, 2025.

Chairman, a move to approve the agenda as presented.

I have a motion uh to uh approve the agenda.

All in favor?

Motion passes unanimously.

Next item on the agenda citizens' comments.

Did anyone sign up for citizens' comments?

Uh seeing none, we will now move to consent agenda item CA1 consider minutes of the regular planning zone planning and zoning commission meeting of January thirteenth, two thousand twenty-five.

Have a motion on the consent agenda.

Chairman, I move to approve the minutes as presented.

I have a motion to approve uh CA one as presented.

Uh have a second.

Second by Commissioner Giacomozi.

Any discussion?

All in favor.

Motion passes unanimously.

Uh next item on the agenda is PH1.

Hold a public hearing and consider a request submitted by Richard and Catherine.

Uh Dam Dadmo.

Case number Z twenty four-thirty-seven to rezone approximately two point one six one acres out of the J Joslin survey abstract number three four three four-one from A agriculture district to AR1 agriculture single family residential district.

The property is locally addressed as nine four five Seder Road, Killing, Texas, and I'll turn it over to staff.

Good evening, Commissioners.

Tonight we have uh PH1.

So uh case number 2437.

We're going from AG to AR1.

So we're holding a public hearing uh for case number 2437 to rezone two point one six one acres uh from ag to AR1 single family uh agricultural family single family district.

Subject properties locally addressed is nine four five Schrader Road.

So we have the uh location map here on the screen showing you the approximate location of the property.

So this is an aerial view of the property as we discussed earlier in the workshop.

You have um a couple of acres there, and then you've got a single family residence to the northwest and another single family residence to the southwest.

Um and a lot of uh larger acreage land around them with some single family homes.

So Richard and Catherine Datamo submitted a request to rezone this 2.161 acres from AG to AR1.

If approved, the applicant intends to build a single family residence on the property.

And the reason for the request to from AG to AR1 is Section 31158B is no structure shall be erected on any lot in an agricultural district that is less than three acres.

So the applicant has turned in to move to AR1.

So the subject property was annexed into the city limits on January 27th in 2008 via an ordinance 07112.

The property was subsequently zoned for a default agricultural district, and after the annexation on November 25th, 2008, via another ordinance 08097, it still retained the agricultural district zoning.

So the property is not currently platted.

So this is a view of the property looking to the east.

This is looking to the north.

This is looking to the south and to the west.

So it is in limited growth sector.

These areas include the furthest extents of our city limits, which primarily includes farmland and large homesteads and agricultural and natural habitat and open space.

So expansion of infrastructure and development in these areas is discouraged, at least for the planning horizon in this plan, and resource stewardship is and physically responsible growth should be considered in these areas.

So it is on the future land use map.

It's in rural estate.

This allows up to 10% non-residential and up to 100% residential uses.

The rural estate is a place type with large lots and single family homes in a rural setting.

And keeping this type of development leaves enough room around for surrounding space and it should involve minimal infrastructure investment.

So the property is not located with any of within any of the city of Kaleen development zones, it's just to the south of all of our development zones.

So staff finds that the applicant's request is consistent with policies and principles in our 2040 comprehensive plan, and staff is of the determination that the applicant's request is compatible with the existing land uses and this the subject property.

So today staff has notified five surrounding property owners.

So of those two reside outside of the 200 foot notification boundary required by the state, but within 400 feet of the notification by council, and three live outside the city of Killeen.

To date staff has received one response in opposition of this request, and all of you should have a copy of that response on your have you had a chance to review it, Mr.

Minor.

Give you give you a second.

Okay.