OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Board of Estimates Meeting – September 1, 2026: 2027 Operating Budget Review

Common Council & CommitteesTuesday, September 1, 2026
BodyLa Crosse, Wisconsin
SessionCommon Council & Committees
DateTuesday, September 1, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 2:18:04

Transcript — Verbatim
6:29

Good afternoon, everyone.

6:30

We're going to call this meeting to order at two oh six PM on what is it?

6:37

September first.

6:39

Wow.

6:40

Of twenty twenty-six.

6:42

Uh to start this meeting off, uh, we will I'll have some remarks and then I'll turn it over to our deputy finance director.

6:51

I would like to thank our local and state elected officials that are here today.

6:55

Thank you for taking time to show up, listen, and help us at the state level.

6:59

We do have Representative Tara Johnson and Representative Jill Billings here today.

7:04

So thank you for coming.

7:06

The City of Lacrosse 2027 executive budget reflects a focused effort to maintain high quality services while navigating the real financial constraints placed on municipalities.

7:42

Departments made intentional staffing adjustments, restructured operations, and streamlined efficiencies to reduce ongoing costs.

7:50

Public safety remains a priority, but reforms were necessary to maintain staffing and service levels aligned with our economic reality.

8:40

Looking ahead, I will ensure we continue developing long-term strategies to strengthen financial stability, including exploring services and personnel consolidation, identifying new revenue sources, and reducing redundancies.

11:10

Something that I did not mention.

11:11

Oh, what if estimates people are present?

20:16

A moment of truth.

20:17

All right.

20:18

Thank you all for bearing with us with the technical difficulties and director, it is on you.

20:24

Thank you.

20:26

Thank you.

20:28

All right.

20:29

So before we dive into the 2027 operating budget numbers, I just want to take a review of the budget process, the constraints, uh trends, and past budgets to better contextualize the 2027 operating budget.

20:45

So the first slide we'll start with is the operating budget process.

20:52

Okay, so the first part of the operating budget process was kicked off by the budget parameter committee that met a couple months ago and directed us to bring three scenarios to the Board of Estimates.

21:10

Scheduled for September 1st, September 2nd, October 12th, and October 13th.

21:16

And per core of ordinance approve a recommended budget by the third Tuesday of October.

21:22

That will get sent to the Common Council, which will hold public meetings on November 16th and November 17th.

21:30

To ultimately adopt the 2027 operating budget by the third Tuesday in November.

21:46

First one is the levy limit, which is a property tax revenue growth constraint that is based on net new construction.

22:13

This is an expense growth constraint.

22:16

This allows the operating expenses of the general fund to grow by an inflation factor.

22:21

And just to clarify on operating expenses, that would be the total general fund expenditures minus our debt service expenses.

22:30

Participation in this program is tied to a historically $1.1 to $1.6 million state aid payment.

22:38

And the third constraint that we operate under is maintenance of effort, which is a requirement of municipalities to maintain current spending and service levels for public safety.

23:04

Okay, next I'm going to get into kind of the budget trends on the revenue side.

23:38

And then on the left, you'll see the dollar amounts of the budget and numbers for the 2027 proposed.

23:52

Okay.

23:53

Then I'm going to detail uh the property tax revenue source a little more and its relation to the limits.

24:01

So state levy limits imposed restrict property tax growth to the net new construction percentage.

24:08

And the two graphs on your right, uh the top one shows our the last seven to eight years of our net new construction percentage.

24:17

And then the graph below that shows the dollar increase, uh showing how much we would be able to increase our levy year to year in a dollar form.

24:27

So as you can see, our trend has since 2021 has been steadily declining towards zero as far as our net new construction percentage.

24:38

Now the city does still retain the ability to raise more uh than the net new construction at this point in time uh through the debt levy adjustment.

24:48

But at some point in the future, we will run out of that capacity and would be held to this um constraint.

25:00

So if we were operating under that constraint, for 2027, our net new constriction, net new construction limit of 0.381% would allow us to increase the levy by 144,000.

25:15

And just a couple of notes, we did start, we didn't start using the debt levy adjustment until the 2022 budget.

25:22

And we currently have about 11 million dollars in capacity to raise for the debt levy limit.

25:33

Okay, I'll move on to the budget trends with expenses.

25:37

So just like the revenues, I have a pie chart showing on the right, uh broken down by expense type in percentage.

25:45

Um this is on operating expenses, so the top cost drivers of operating expenses.

25:50

So just to refresh, that would be our total budget of 76 million minus our debt expenses.

25:58

And then on the left, I have it broken down into with the percentage and the dollar amount, and I've also detailed any expense type that is over 1% of our budget.

26:11

So to point out here, um, the big number out there is 78% of our operating expenses are personnel related, which would be salary and benefits.

26:21

And the other uh big chunk would be 15.6% of contracted services.

26:32

Okay, then on the next slide, um, kind of tie that into the expense budget limits.

26:40

So the expenditure restraint program allows operating expenses to grow by the annual inflation factor as of August 31st, plus 60% of the net new construction rate, which as you can see continues to go down for the city of lacrosse.

26:55

Uh so built into this 2027 proposed budget that we'll go through.

27:00

The budgeted amount is 3% increase per ERP guidelines, which would equal $1.9 million allowable growth and operating expenses.

27:12

And then right below that, I just kind of from the previous slide I had identified here's our top cost drivers.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Budget Equity Analysis█████████████████████████████████████████████48%
Fiscal Sustainability███████████████████20%
Personnel Matters██████████████15%
Public Engagement██████6%
Public Safety█████5%
Procedural████4%
Community Engagement██2%
Summary of Proceedings

Board of Estimates Meeting – September 1, 2026: 2027 Operating Budget Review

The Board of Estimates convened at 2:06 PM on Tuesday, September 1, 2026, to review and discuss the proposed 2027 Operating Budget. The meeting lasted until 4:14 PM. Mayor Shaundel Washington-Spivey and all 10 council members were present. The session included a detailed presentation on budget constraints, trends, and three revenue scenarios, followed by extensive discussion on departmental reductions, layoffs, and the use of fund balance.

Discussion Items

  • Budget Presentation and Structural Deficit: Deputy Finance Director presented the budget process, noting expenditure restraint program (ERP) limits, levy limits, and the city's structural deficit where expenses grow faster than revenues. Since 2021, net new construction percentage has steadily declined, limiting property tax levy growth. For 2027, the net new construction limit would allow only a $144,000 levy increase. The city currently has about $11 million in debt levy adjustment capacity.

  • Three Revenue Scenarios: Three scenarios were presented, all meeting ERP:

    • Scenario 1: No tax increase, using $945,185 from fund balance. Mill rate remains at 8.52, zero dollar tax effect on a $100,000 home.
    • Scenario 2: Use $472,592 from fund balance, resulting in a 1.06% tax increase ($9.06 per $100,000 home).
    • Scenario 3: No use of fund balance, resulting in a 2.13% tax increase ($18.12 per $100,000 home). Mayor recommended Scenario 1 to give residents a break from inflation.
  • Departmental Reductions and Layoffs: The proposed budget includes significant cuts across departments. A list of reductions was provided without dollar amounts, leading to a motion (passed unanimously) to require the mayor to provide expense detail for each reduction. Council members expressed concern about the lack of financial transparency and the impact on services.

    • Personnel Cuts: 78% of operating expenses are personnel-related. The budget includes a 21.2% increase in health insurance premiums, a 3% COLA for non-represented staff, and 2.75% step increases. To balance, several departments are eliminating or unfunding positions.
    • Specific Cuts Announced:
      • Library: 5 FTE reduction (4 currently employed, 1 open position). Director Wasick noted a 21% staff reduction over 10 years.
      • Streets Department: 2 involuntary layoffs of filled positions.
      • Finance: 1 part-time position elimination.
      • Human Resources: 1 full-time position elimination (employee safety and risk specialist).
      • Police Department: Holding 6 positions open (including 1 vacant elimination). Chief Koudron stated they are prepared to meet demands.
      • Fire Department: To meet a $952,000 cut, staffing would drop from 101 to 93 authorized, taking Rescue 2 out of service. Chief Shepard warned this approaches a line jeopardizing citizen and firefighter safety.
      • Parks and Beautification: Elimination of custodian, arts coordinator, forestry coordinator, neighborhood center staff, and the beautification program. Director Odegaard noted the $40,000 beautification budget equals the cost of a youth soccer program.
    • Council members expressed values: Councilmember Trost advocated for no layoffs, calling the budget a values document. Councilmember Kahlow and others criticized cuts to "small things" like flowers and library services.
  • Health Insurance: The Employee Benefit Trust Fund recommended a 21.2% premium increase for both employer and employee, with quarterly meetings to explore plan design changes for 2028.

  • TID and Utility Adjustments: Director Train explained that departments like legal and planning will now charge TID admin fees for work on TIF projects, and utilities will directly pay for engineering services previously funded by the levy. These changes reduce general fund expenses.

  • Use of Fund Balance: Mayor argued for using fund balance to avoid a tax increase, noting the city has a healthy unassigned fund balance of $19.7 million (26% of operating expenditures, above the 20% policy minimum). Councilmembers Sleznikow, Goggin, and Kahlow opposed using reserves, viewing it as unsustainable and risking emergency preparedness. Councilmember Newberry noted the $18.12 annual increase per $100,000 home in Scenario 3 is about $1.50 per month.

  • Future Budget Options: Mayor listed future options under exploration, including refuse/recycling fees, diversification of revenue, shared services, fire service fees, levy referendum, and lobbying for state shared revenue reform.

Key Outcomes

  • Motion to Direct Mayor to Provide Expense Detail: Councilmember Sleznikow moved, seconded by Janssen, to require the mayor to provide dollar amounts for the list of department reductions. The motion passed unanimously (10-0). Mayor committed to providing the information but noted it would not be ready by September 2.

  • Motion to Cancel September 2 Meeting: Councilmember Northwood moved, seconded by Trost, to cancel the Board of Estimates meeting scheduled for September 2, 2026, to allow time to review the detailed reduction information. The motion passed unanimously (10-0). The next meetings remain scheduled for October 12 and October 13, 2026.

  • Next Steps: The Board will reconvene in October to further deliberate and recommend a budget to the Common Council. The Common Council will hold public hearings on November 16 and 17, with final adoption due by the third Tuesday of November.

Meeting Transcript

Good afternoon, everyone. We're going to call this meeting to order at two oh six PM on what is it? September first. Wow. Of twenty twenty-six. Uh to start this meeting off, uh, we will I'll have some remarks and then I'll turn it over to our deputy finance director. I would like to thank our local and state elected officials that are here today. Thank you for taking time to show up, listen, and help us at the state level. We do have Representative Tara Johnson and Representative Jill Billings here today. So thank you for coming. The City of Lacrosse 2027 executive budget reflects a focused effort to maintain high quality services while navigating the real financial constraints placed on municipalities. Departments made intentional staffing adjustments, restructured operations, and streamlined efficiencies to reduce ongoing costs. Public safety remains a priority, but reforms were necessary to maintain staffing and service levels aligned with our economic reality. Looking ahead, I will ensure we continue developing long-term strategies to strengthen financial stability, including exploring services and personnel consolidation, identifying new revenue sources, and reducing redundancies. Something that I did not mention. Oh, what if estimates people are present? A moment of truth. All right. Thank you all for bearing with us with the technical difficulties and director, it is on you. Thank you. Thank you. All right. So before we dive into the 2027 operating budget numbers, I just want to take a review of the budget process, the constraints, uh trends, and past budgets to better contextualize the 2027 operating budget. So the first slide we'll start with is the operating budget process. Okay, so the first part of the operating budget process was kicked off by the budget parameter committee that met a couple months ago and directed us to bring three scenarios to the Board of Estimates. Scheduled for September 1st, September 2nd, October 12th, and October 13th. And per core of ordinance approve a recommended budget by the third Tuesday of October. That will get sent to the Common Council, which will hold public meetings on November 16th and November 17th. To ultimately adopt the 2027 operating budget by the third Tuesday in November. First one is the levy limit, which is a property tax revenue growth constraint that is based on net new construction. This is an expense growth constraint. This allows the operating expenses of the general fund to grow by an inflation factor. And just to clarify on operating expenses, that would be the total general fund expenditures minus our debt service expenses. Participation in this program is tied to a historically $1.1 to $1.6 million state aid payment. And the third constraint that we operate under is maintenance of effort, which is a requirement of municipalities to maintain current spending and service levels for public safety. Okay, next I'm going to get into kind of the budget trends on the revenue side. And then on the left, you'll see the dollar amounts of the budget and numbers for the 2027 proposed. Okay. Then I'm going to detail uh the property tax revenue source a little more and its relation to the limits. So state levy limits imposed restrict property tax growth to the net new construction percentage. And the two graphs on your right, uh the top one shows our the last seven to eight years of our net new construction percentage. And then the graph below that shows the dollar increase, uh showing how much we would be able to increase our levy year to year in a dollar form. So as you can see, our trend has since 2021 has been steadily declining towards zero as far as our net new construction percentage. Now the city does still retain the ability to raise more uh than the net new construction at this point in time uh through the debt levy adjustment. But at some point in the future, we will run out of that capacity and would be held to this um constraint. So if we were operating under that constraint, for 2027, our net new constriction, net new construction limit of 0.381% would allow us to increase the levy by 144,000. And just a couple of notes, we did start, we didn't start using the debt levy adjustment until the 2022 budget. And we currently have about 11 million dollars in capacity to raise for the debt levy limit. Okay, I'll move on to the budget trends with expenses. So just like the revenues, I have a pie chart showing on the right, uh broken down by expense type in percentage.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com