OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Las Cruces Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting – September 23, 2025

Planning & ZoningTuesday, September 23, 2025
BodyLas Cruces, New Mexico
SessionPlanning & Zoning
DateTuesday, September 23, 2025
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 37:42

Transcript — Verbatim
3:59

Good evening, welcome to the planning and zoning commission meeting.

4:03

Today is Tuesday, September twenty third, uh, two thousand twenty-five.

4:09

And I am Chair Thurston.

4:11

Um, we're going to go on to the conflicts of interest.

4:15

Does anybody have any conflicts of interest tonight?

4:18

Once again, I have a conflict of interest.

4:20

We have one of our own uh land, but we will get to that in one is on the agenda.

4:27

I think it's eight point one is the one I have a conflict of interest on.

4:31

Um, going to move to public participation.

4:35

Um there is um if there's anybody here that would like to say anything that's not regarding the items on the agenda today, you can do so right now.

4:51

Also, this is your time to um if you have any issues with what is on the consent agenda, this is your time also to have any questions about that.

5:00

So that'd be 7.1, 7.2, 7.3.

5:04

If we have anyone for public participation.

5:08

And no, we do not.

5:09

Okay.

5:10

So now we're gonna go on to the acceptance of the agenda.

5:15

Um, there is one item on here though on the acceptance of the agenda.

5:19

Um help me walk this walk me through this one again.

5:23

So we need to remove 8.1 in its entirety because it is it's it's the one that I have a conflict of interest on, and since we don't have a quorum here to table it, we can't have any really discussion about it.

5:44

So we're just gonna see if we can remove 8.1 and then we'll have to reapply for the following month.

5:51

So I need a motion for someone to remove 8.1.

5:55

Is that correct?

5:56

Oh, except the agenda with the removal of 8.1.

6:01

Okay, so just to clarify uh 8.1 isn't gonna be postponed.

6:07

It's just straight removal.

6:09

Okay.

6:09

I'll make it I'll make a motion to accept tonight's agenda uh with removing item 8.1.

6:16

I second.

6:18

Okay, this is on the motion to accept the agenda with the removal of 8.1.

6:22

Commissioner Acosta.

6:24

Yes.

6:26

Commissioner Murray.

6:27

Yes, Commissioner Kaiser, yes.

6:30

And Chair.

6:32

Yes.

6:33

Thank you.

6:41

All right.

6:41

So the acceptance of the agenda, then that moves us down to postponements now.

6:51

No, we have each one of those indefinitely.

6:57

No.

6:57

Okay, so I'm being told on these postponements we need to have a motion that is going to table to post to postpone six point one and six point two indefinitely.

7:13

I make a motion to postpone six point one and six point two indefinitely.

7:17

Oh, I gotta have you do it as a separate vote.

7:19

Sorry, I'm I'm messing it up.

7:22

I make a motion to remove six point one indefinitely.

7:27

I'll second.

7:30

This is on the motion to postpone item six point one indefinitely.

7:34

Commissioner Acosta.

7:35

Yes.

7:36

Commissioner Murray.

7:38

Yes.

7:38

Commissioner Kaiser.

7:40

Yes.

7:40

And Chair.

7:41

Yes.

7:42

Thank you.

7:45

I'll make a motion to postpone indefinitely item 6.2.

7:49

I second.

7:51

This is on a motion to uh postpon item 6.2 indefinitely.

7:56

Commissioner Acosta.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Zoning Regulations███████████████████████████████████████████43%
Procedural████████████████████████24%
Cannabis Regulation████████████████████████24%
Engineering And Infrastructure██████6%
Public Engagement███3%
Summary of Proceedings

Las Cruces Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting – September 23, 2025

The Planning and Zoning Commission convened on Tuesday, September 23, 2025, at 7:00 PM (presumed). Chair Thurston presided over the meeting, which included the removal of one agenda item due to a conflict of interest, indefinite postponement of two items, and votes on a special use permit for a cannabis dispensary and a mixed-use subdivision master plan and preliminary plat. All votes were unanimous (4-0).

Public Participation

  • No members of the public spoke during the general public participation period.

Consent Calendar

  • Items 7.1, 7.2, and 7.3 were listed on the consent agenda but were not discussed or voted upon during the meeting; no public comments were offered.

Discussion Items

Item 8.1 – Removed

  • Chair Thurston declared a conflict of interest on item 8.1. Due to lack of a quorum to table, the commission voted unanimously (4-0) to remove the item from the agenda entirely; the applicant was advised to reapply in a subsequent month.

Items 6.1 & 6.2 – Postponed Indefinitely

  • The commission voted separately to postpone both items indefinitely (4-0 each). No further details were provided.

Item 8.2 – Special Use Permit for Cannabis Dispensary

  • Applicant: Represented by staff (Adam Ochoa).
  • Proposal: A new cannabis dispensary at 1103 South Solano Drive, located within 197 feet of an existing dispensary, triggering a special use permit under the Realized Las Cruces development code.
  • Staff Recommendation: Approval, citing compliance with buffer distances from schools/daycares, consistency with the Elevate Las Cruces comprehensive plan, and the property's commercial context. Staff received two phone calls opposing the dispensary (one against this location, one against dispensaries in general).
  • Commissioner Questions: Commissioner Kaiser clarified that parking was not required under the new code (zeroed urban zone) but the applicant chose to provide off-street parking. Landscaping requirements were met via a planter area.
  • Public Comment: None.
  • Vote: Approved 4-0 (Commissioners Acosta, Murray, Kaiser, and Chair Thurston).

Items 8.3 & 8.4 – Coyote Run Subdivision Master Plan and Preliminary Plat

  • Applicant: Anton Magallanis (Moy Surveying) representing the owner.
  • Proposal: A 25.05-acre mixed-use development on three parcels, including a 3.07-acre non-residential tract (C2 zoning) and 20 large residential lots (R1A) on 18.81 acres. The project also includes dedication of right-of-way for Coyote Loop and extension of Thurman Drive.
  • Staff Recommendation: Approval with one condition: If the master plan is not approved by December 31, 2025, the developer must dedicate parkland or pay a fee in lieu under Realized Las Cruces; otherwise, the 2001 code applies. The DRC unanimously recommended approval on August 20, 2025.
  • Commissioner Questions: Commissioner Kaiser sought clarification on the condition—staff confirmed that only the parkland dedication trigger changes if the deadline is missed; other Realized Las Cruces standards will apply at construction. The applicant noted the project was submitted under the old code during the transition.
  • Public Comment: Eugene Hanley, a landowner in the area, urged approval to avoid cost increases for lot buyers; he stated larger lots are desirable and a park is unwanted.
  • Vote: The items were heard together via a motion to suspend the rules, then voted separately. Both approved 4-0 (Commissioners Acosta, Murray, Kaiser, Chair Thurston).

Key Outcomes

  • Item 8.1: Removed from agenda (4-0).
  • Items 6.1 & 6.2: Postponed indefinitely (each 4-0).
  • Item 8.2 (Cannabis Dispensary SUP): Approved (4-0).
  • Item 8.3 (Coyote Run Master Plan): Approved (4-0) with the condition regarding parkland dedication by December 31, 2025.
  • Item 8.4 (Coyote Run Preliminary Plat): Approved (4-0).

Staff Announcements

  • Staff reminded commissioners that November and December meetings will be moved to the third Tuesday due to holidays.
  • Chris Faber, Community Development Director, announced that minor amendments to Realized Las Cruces will be brought back in October, requiring a quorum.

Meeting Transcript

Good evening, welcome to the planning and zoning commission meeting. Today is Tuesday, September twenty third, uh, two thousand twenty-five. And I am Chair Thurston. Um, we're going to go on to the conflicts of interest. Does anybody have any conflicts of interest tonight? Once again, I have a conflict of interest. We have one of our own uh land, but we will get to that in one is on the agenda. I think it's eight point one is the one I have a conflict of interest on. Um, going to move to public participation. Um there is um if there's anybody here that would like to say anything that's not regarding the items on the agenda today, you can do so right now. Also, this is your time to um if you have any issues with what is on the consent agenda, this is your time also to have any questions about that. So that'd be 7.1, 7.2, 7.3. If we have anyone for public participation. And no, we do not. Okay. So now we're gonna go on to the acceptance of the agenda. Um, there is one item on here though on the acceptance of the agenda. Um help me walk this walk me through this one again. So we need to remove 8.1 in its entirety because it is it's it's the one that I have a conflict of interest on, and since we don't have a quorum here to table it, we can't have any really discussion about it. So we're just gonna see if we can remove 8.1 and then we'll have to reapply for the following month. So I need a motion for someone to remove 8.1. Is that correct? Oh, except the agenda with the removal of 8.1. Okay, so just to clarify uh 8.1 isn't gonna be postponed. It's just straight removal. Okay. I'll make it I'll make a motion to accept tonight's agenda uh with removing item 8.1. I second. Okay, this is on the motion to accept the agenda with the removal of 8.1. Commissioner Acosta. Yes. Commissioner Murray. Yes, Commissioner Kaiser, yes. And Chair. Yes. Thank you. All right. So the acceptance of the agenda, then that moves us down to postponements now. No, we have each one of those indefinitely. No. Okay, so I'm being told on these postponements we need to have a motion that is going to table to post to postpone six point one and six point two indefinitely. I make a motion to postpone six point one and six point two indefinitely. Oh, I gotta have you do it as a separate vote. Sorry, I'm I'm messing it up. I make a motion to remove six point one indefinitely. I'll second. This is on the motion to postpone item six point one indefinitely. Commissioner Acosta. Yes. Commissioner Murray.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com