Finance/Government Operations and Economic Development Committee CIP Work Session – February 24, 2026
Finance/Government Operations and Economic Development Committee Capital Improvement Program Work Session – February 24, 2026
The Finance/Government Operations and Economic Development Committee (FGOEDC) held a work session on the proposed FY 2027–FY 2032 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) on February 24, 2026. The committee reviewed the $4.3 billion six-year CIP, discussed cost increases for the Western Loudoun Recreation Center Complex, and considered several funding scenarios including reallocations for transportation and community projects. No public comments were received. The committee voted on multiple motions, forwarding one item to the full Board of Supervisors for further analysis.
Discussion Items
-
FY 2027–FY 2032 Capital Improvement Program Overview
- Staff presented a high-level summary of the proposed CIP totaling $4.3 billion: $1.3 billion (31%) for county projects, $1.8 billion (41%) for transportation, and $1.2 billion (28%) for school projects, aligning with the board’s guidance of 30/40/30 funding ratios.
- Debt capacity remains in each year of the six-year period, but is tighter in the first three years due to the addition of the new Department of General Services headquarters and other projects.
- The percentage of local tax funding in the proposed CIP increased from 24% in FY26 adopted to 29% in the proposed CIP.
- No new road projects were added; priority went to cost increases, schedule adjustments, sidewalk/trail bundling ($35–$40 million per year), and intersection improvements (all round three projects incorporated).
- A new 40,000 square foot library facility in the Ashburn planning sub-area was discussed, with recommendations to expand the Sterling Library via lease, incorporate a larger footprint in the Cascades Library project, and evaluate options for the existing Ashburn Library.
-
Western Loudoun Recreation Center Complex
- Staff provided a detailed update, noting that the project cost estimate has increased from $152 million (FY26 adopted CIP) to $261 million, an increase of $108 million.
- Reasons for the increase include: square footage expansion from 83,000 to 96,000 sq ft (to include a teen center approved in April 2025), site constraints (topography, wetlands, vegetation preservation), underestimated earthwork and site utility costs, and low original cost assumptions per square foot.
- The complex includes a recreation center (gym, fitness, aquatic center with competition and leisure pools, running track), outdoor park amenities (four diamond fields, four multi-use fields, pickleball, tennis, basketball, playground, off-leash area, trails), and a future library site.
- Supervisor Leterno questioned whether changing sites could reduce costs; staff responded that on a per-square-foot and per-acre basis, the project is comparable to Ashburn Rec Center and Hansen Park when escalated for inflation, but site-specific challenges remain.
- Supervisor Kershner expressed concern about the cost increase but acknowledged inflation and initial mispricing were factors.
- The revised budget is already included in the proposed CIP; additional funding will be needed in FY27 for construction contract award.
-
Funding Scenarios and Motions
-
Route 15 / Hogback Mountain Road Roundabout and Fleetwood Road
- Supervisor Tacroni submitted a scenario to remove the Route 15 Hogback Mountain Road Roundabout project ($14.3 million) and reallocate funds to Fleetwood Road improvements, plus move $3.15 million from the Route 15 Braddock Road Roundabout project (due to expected federal earmark). Staff did not recommend this because the Fleetwood Road study is not yet complete.
- An alternative motion was offered: rename the project to "Route 15 Hogback Mountain Road Intersection Improvements" and evaluate alternatives to the roundabout (e.g., turn lanes). Supervisor Laterno suggested referring the matter to the full Board of Supervisors work session on March 9, 2026, to allow district supervisors a vote and to gather additional traffic data. That motion passed 4-0-1 (Chair Randall absent).
- Supervisor Kershner opposed removing the roundabout, noting that the project had undergone a public process and that fatalities have occurred at the intersection. Supervisor Tacroni argued that the intersection is a low-volume, low-priority (level 3 in IIP) and that Fleetwood Road has greater safety concerns.
-
Belmont Ridge Road Bicycle/Pedestrian Crossing to Partlow Road Improvements
- Supervisor Turner moved to remove $6.804 million from the Belmont Ridge Road bicycle/pedestrian crossing of Dulles Greenway (funds in FY30-32) and create the Partlow Road Improvements Project. This was seconded by Supervisor Saines and passed 4-0-1.
-
Other Scenarios Discussed
- Supervisor Laterno requested staff to prepare a scenario moving funding from Stone Spring shared use path to Destiny Drive long-term improvements, and moving the $500,000 Southern Services Center planning money from FY30 to the FY26 fund balance discussion.
- Supervisor Kershner raised several town projects: Lovettsville water tower (remaining $308,000 after EPA grant), Lovettsville wastewater treatment, Hamilton sewer lining, and Hillsborough Old Stone School ($120,000 value engineering). Staff recommended a comprehensive water/wastewater study be completed before funding town utility projects, but agreed to look into a scenario for the Hillsborough Old Stone School.
-
Key Outcomes
- Motion to refer Route 15 Hogback Mountain Road intersection discussion to the full Board of Supervisors work session on March 9, 2026 (directing staff to provide traffic analysis, updates to the corridor study, and cost estimates for turn-lane alternatives). Passed 4-0-1.
- Motion to create the Partlow Road Improvements Project by removing $6.804 million from the Belmont Ridge Road bicycle/pedestrian crossing of Dulles Greenway. Passed 4-0-1.
- Motion directing staff to develop CIP scenarios including those listed by staff and return to the committee on March 4, 2026. Passed 4-0-1.
- A motion by Supervisor Tacroni to reappropriate Route 15 roundabout funds to Fleetwood Road failed 1-3-1 (only Supervisor Tacroni voted in favor).
- The committee did not vote on Supervisor Laterno’s requested scenarios (Stone Spring/Destiny Drive, Southern Services Center) but directed staff to include them in the packet motion.
- Staff was asked to evaluate the Hillsborough Old Stone School scenario ($120,000) separately.
Meeting Transcript
Test test test. Pitch my fingers. I would like to call to order the February 24th, 2026 Loudoun County Board of Supervisors Finance, Government Operations and Economic Development Committee Capital Improvement Program Work Session. This room has a hearing loop. If you need hearing assistance, please switch on your hearing aids to switch your hearing aids to telecoil mode. If you need a headset, we have those available. We had two questions from Supervisor GLASS and one from Supervisor Turner that were not answered for this packet, but they will be answered in the March 4th packet. So we do apologize for that. And then also the last item is just an information item is mentioned for the Western Loud and Recreation Project. And now I will turn to a high-level summary of the CIP, focusing on how it aligns to the budget guidance we received. The six-year period totals 4.3 billion dollars. County projects total 1.3 billion dollars or 31%. Transportation projects are 1.8 billion or 41%, and school projects are 1.2 billion or 28%. And these percentages aligned to the guidance provided by the board to generally maintain the 30, 40, 30 percent funding ratios for county transportation and schools, respectively. Two new years have been added to the CIP. Cost and schedule changes for existing projects are accommodated first. New projects are added according to the criteria that the board endorsed in July, and additional local tax funding is programmed to conserve debt capacity in future years, and so that additional capacity was not used to significantly increase the size of the CIP. Okay, this table shows the annual debt issuance guideline as it was raised in July, as well as the projected debt issuance in the six-year CIP. Debt capacity remains in each year as per the budget guidance. There is less capacity in the first three years of the CIP due to the addition of the new Department of General Services headquarters, warehouse and fleet maintenance facilities, which was added to FY27. This project was originally intended to be accomplished through the Tuscaurora Land Bay 3 substation legislative application, which was deferred indefinitely by the applicant in October of 2025, as well as cost increases for the Western Loudoun Rec Center complex and several road projects. The percentage of local tax funding in the proposed CIP is 29% compared to 24% for the FY26 adopted CIP. This slide shows the expenditures with the FY26 adopted budget at the top and the proposed CIP at the bottom. As noted earlier, the proposed CIP generally maintains the funding ratios between county transportation and schools, which is roughly similar to the adopted FY26 CIP. The Loudoun County Public Schools funding share increased despite moving new school construction out of the six-year period. The proposed CIP includes more funding for school renovations, renewals, and alterations, and fully accommodates the school board's adopted CIP, whereas last year CIP did not. I'm sorry, sorry. New road projects were added, no new road projects were added to the CIP because priority in the transportation category went to cost increases and schedule adjustments on existing road projects and for providing funding to bundle sidewalk and trail projects as well as moving the next round of intersection improvement projects into the plan. This slide provides more information related to what was accommodated for the sidewalk and trails, intersection improvement program, and the bus stops and shelters projects. The funding for sidewalk and trails as noted was adjusted to allow for the bundling of project segments to implement more efficient delivery. This bundling resulted in roughly 35 to 40 million dollars allocated for that purpose each year. For the intersection improvement program, all round three projects have been incorporated into the six-year period. And for the bus shelter program, the funding was accelerated to support the increase of production from 20 shelters per year to 40. Okay, and as you know, the summary of new projects and other changes section of the budget document contains additional information about new projects and changes to other projects. And as a reminder, existing projects are not delayed or deferred in order to accommodate new projects. The capital needs assessment calls for a new 40,000 square foot library facility in the Ashburn planning sub-area. This includes portions of the Ashburn, Sterling, Broadrun, and Algonquian election districts. Based on discussions with the district board members and library board of trustees, staff is recommending the following item listed here on this slide to achieve that square footage trigger and the full programming for library services. So one is to expand the Sterling Library through lease space through which negotiations are occurring and information will come to the board. Also to incorporate a larger footprint on the Cascades Library project. There is an existing Cascades Library and Senior Center project in the CIP that received funding for planning purposes, which is occurring now, assuming that those concepts can be approved in the next few months. Design would be ready to begin in FY27 where that design funding is programmed. And then also to evaluate the expansion options for the Eastern Library, Eastern, I'm sorry, existing Ashburn Library, or to relocate to a larger facility, whether that is constructed by the county or but through by a developer. Okay. And at this time, I will turn the presentation over to Scott Warris, Deputy Director and Department of Transportation and Capital Infrastructure to discuss the Western Land Recreation Complex project. Before Mr. Wars starts, or maybe you're going to include this in your comments, but I'm just wondering why it was separated out as a separate item. Well, I read it. I read it. So I asked that it be separated out, uh, ma'am chair, because we received a lot of questions from board members about it.
openpublica.com