FY 2027 Budget Work Session – Loudoun County Board of Supervisors – March 2, 2026
FY 2027 Budget Work Session – March 2, 2026
The Loudoun County Board of Supervisors convened a budget work session on March 2, 2026, at 10:30 AM to begin deliberations on the FY 2027 proposed budget. Chair Randall opened the meeting, stressing the importance of work sessions for offering amendments and asking questions. Staff provided an overview of the budget packet, tax rate proposals, and the toteboard process. An opening motion to place the proposed budget on the table at a real property tax rate of 80.5 cents (tax year 2026) and personal property tax rates of $4.15 (general) and $3.09 (vehicles, tax year 2026) / $3.00 (tax year 2027) passed 9‑0. The remainder of the session focused on departmental resource requests, with no final votes on individual items.
Discussion Items
Emergency Management, Safety, and Security (David Short)
- Funded request: one security analyst to monitor open‑source and social media for threats to county officials, employees, and facilities. This position would transition threat monitoring from a collateral duty to a continuous function.
- Unfunded alternate: one senior emergency management specialist to manage the Tier II hazardous chemical reporting program, the local emergency planning committee (LEPC), facility plan reviews, and dam/impoundment compliance. This would free up a supervisor to focus on special events coordination.
- Supervisor Crowley noted the board had approved six safety/security specialists in FY 26; Short confirmed they have been hired and are focused on physical security, not the cyber/social media role.
- Vice Chair Turner clarified that alternate requests are additional unfunded items, not alternatives to funded items, and can only be added by reducing other expenses or raising the tax rate.
Equity and Inclusion (Carl Rush)
- Unfunded alternate: one learning development supervisor to enhance OEI’s capacity for professional learning, curriculum oversight, and data tracking. Current lack of middle management limits scaling; OEI has received over 160 requests and provided 600+ hours of leap implementation support.
- Supervisor Bricksman expressed hope that a large resource request elsewhere would not be approved, freeing funds for all alternate requests.
- Chair Randall acknowledged the team’s work amid challenging conditions.
Finance and Procurement (Eileen Crawford)
- Funded request: two grant analysts to support prospecting, compliance, and data management for federal, state, and county grants. The county missed a multimillion‑dollar grant due to insufficient writing capacity.
- Funded request: $500,000 to continue the child care fee reduction program from January 1 to June 30, 2027, after ARPA funds expire. The program currently serves 121 children with a waitlist of 51; families must be at or below 80% AMI and use a Loudoun provider. Full‑year funding would be approximately $1 million annually.
- Supervisor Laterno questioned whether two analysts were needed given potential reductions in federal grants; Crawford emphasized increased compliance requirements from executive orders and site visits.
- Chair Randall noted the board had previously prioritized transitioning the child care program to local funding.
General Services (Mr. Brown)
- Funded requests: facilities maintenance staffing for new stations (Fire Station 28, Purceville expansion), glass recycling expansion (funded by plastic bag tax), a program administrator, and a local tax‑neutral waste management position. These maintain current service levels.
- Unfunded alternate: one public works crew chief and two technicians to address a growing backlog; without them, work orders per staff would rise from 300 to 342, risking deferred inspections and noncompliance.
- Brown noted the county maintains stormwater infrastructure as the “maintainer of last resort,” with only two crews for the entire county. Supervisor Kirshner questioned whether the county should continue accepting that liability.
- Supervisor Bricksman expressed concern about the sustainability of the plastic bag tax revenue; a pending state bill could reduce the county’s share.
Human Resources (Aaron Moore)
- Funded request: a reasonable accommodation coordinator (due to ADA caseload doubling post‑COVID), two staffing/compensation positions (application volume rose from 30,000 to 60,000 per year since FY 23), and a benefit specialist for workers’ comp/FMLA (claims up 19%–76% while workforce grew 48%). The benefit specialist is listed as priority 3.
- Supervisor Crowley asked if the benefit specialist was truly the lowest priority; Moore acknowledged operational risks if unfunded.
- Supervisor Bricksman asked about accommodations for addiction; Moore confirmed that substance abuse treatment falls under disability accommodations.
Information Technology (Nate Wentland)
- Funded request: a security operations manager to oversee cybersecurity tools and response to increasing ransomware and nation‑state threats. The position is critical for maintaining the county’s cyber insurance rating and protecting sensitive data.
- Chair Randall praised the team’s proactive approach.
Public Affairs and Communications (Glenn Barber)
- Funded request: a communications manager dedicated to supporting the Department of General Services (DGS), whose communications needs have grown significantly. This would free up other PAC staff and improve service delivery—currently 15–20% of services miss requested timeframes.
- Chair Randall commended the county’s social media updates.
Real Property Asset Management and Planning (Jackie Marsh)
- Funded request: a planning program manager and a senior master planner to handle increased space planning workload; the team currently completes about 70% of projects annually, and these positions would raise that to 90%.
- Unfunded alternate: a real estate specialist to manage lease negotiations; the county oversees 75 leases plus 16 new ones.
- Supervisor Turner asked whether a new county government building would reduce the need for lease space; Marsh noted that new buildings are designed for 2050 growth, and leased space will still be needed for employees who don’t fit in the central building.
Key Outcomes
- Opening motion passed 9‑0 to set tax rates and appropriations as proposed, allowing budget deliberations to proceed.
- No final decisions on individual resource requests were made during this work session; board members indicated they would consider motions at the conclusion of work sessions based on overall budget capacity.
- Staff will respond to remaining budget questions at the next work session on March 5, 2026.
- The CIP work session is scheduled for March 4, 2026 (Finance Committee).
- Chair Randall will be absent for the March 4 public hearing; Vice Chair Turner will preside.
Meeting Transcript
Well, here we go. We start budget season. I hope all of us have told our loved ones we'll see you in April. Um I'm going to call the March 2nd, 2026, Board Supervisors budget work session to order. Board members, I'd like to stress the importance of the budget work sessions as the time for us to offer changes, additions, and deletions to the budget. Board members should try to offer all all desired amendments and ask any questions you have during the work sessions. Please only offer motions that you intend to support so we can be efficient with our limited time during each session. In addition, if you would like to offer motions on items that do not appear in the proposed budget uh proposed budget, please work with staff prior to the work session to ensure your motion is accurate and accomplishes your intended results. When we get to our final vote on April 7th, staff will not be able to make large changes to the budget during the meeting, and the vote on the budget could be delayed if there are substantial substantive substantive changes that were not discussed a voted on during the work session. So in short, please, if you're going to support a motion, please support the motion and also support the tax rate for that motion. She is also going to go over the tote board and organizational matters. Okay. She's going to do that first, and then I'm going to make a motion to start with the um to start the process. And then we're off and running. So we're ready when you were, ma'am. Good evening, Chairman. Uh, to begin FY27 budget deliberations. Next slide. I'll begin my remarks with an overview of this evening's work session packet, which was distributed on Friday. The packet includes responses to over fifty questions on the operating budget. Responses to the remaining questions will be included in Wednesday evening's packet ahead of the next operating budget work session on March 5th. The packet also includes responses from two questions from the Loudon County Public Schools. Staff has also received many questions on the CIP, responses to which will be included in the work session packet that will be distributed tomorrow ahead of the finance committee's work session on March 4th. The packet also includes item two, budget work sessions, organizational matters. This item includes important details about the budget, tax rates, tote board, and recommendation for an opening motion. The proposed budget is consistent with the board's final guidance to constrain the growth of the operating budget for the county and schools. All revenue beyond the operating budget growth targets shown in this slide is dedicated to as pay-go funding to the CIP as well as to the housing fund. Next slide. And then personal property tax rate on vehicles for tax year 26 at $3.09, which has already been set by the board, and for tax year 27 a rate of $3. Next slide. The county's growth target of 9% in the purple box on the far left provides $70 million of new local tax funding. This allocation is funding all employee pay base budget and funded resource requests in the proposed budget. Next slide. The executive summary also provides information about a subset of resource requests that are not funded but are available to fund at the board's discretion through a tote board motion. As departments come before you during work sessions, they will discuss both their funded and unfunded resource requests if they have them. Funded resource requests are noted by the blue color and unfunded are in purple in the budget document. And again, the description of those begin on page 50 of your hard copy document. Next slide. This slide notes that the equalized rate has been recalculated for. So supervisors, um, page 50 under the under the tab that says resource request. So good so go to that go to that tab because they still it starts the countover. So go to the tab that says resource request and page 50 from and so all that we're doing tonight as I call out page numbers will all be under or behind that tab that says resource request. And if you if there's something that is funded, then no motions need to be made. Um motions need to be made to take out something that's already funded or to put in something that is unfunded. But if you're not what if you don't want to do anything, then there are no motions that will be required. Thank you. Thanks. Um this slide notes that the equalized rate has been recalculated since the budget was published last month. An error in the commissioner's assessment summary has been corrected, which he communicated with you about last week, and the rate has been revised from 74 cents to 73 and a half cents. There is no change to the homeowner's equalized rate.
openpublica.com