The Loudoun County Board of Supervisors held a public hearing on May 13, 2026, to consider five consolidated agenda items and two individual land use applications. The hearing opened with a procedural debate over whether to postpone reconsideration motions from the May 4, 2026 special board meeting until May 19, 2026, due to two absent supervisors. The board voted 4-3 to postpone the motions. Following that, the board approved the consolidated items, deliberated on the SDC Ashburn I special exception and the Barrister substation applications, and forwarded both to future business meetings.
Supervisors, good evening, staff, and good evening, Louden. Before I call to order the um the public hearing, uh, because once I call the order the public hearing, we're in public hearing, I want to have just a discussion with colleagues and see what you all think about this idea. Um the last time when we were on the dais, we recessed the meeting instead of adjourned it only because we were so tired that we were seeing spots in front of our faces, and we were going to have a close session that had nothing to do with the with Raw Rush that probably would have lasted about an hour. So we recessed a public meeting till tonight so that we can roll the closed session over. Um technically, obviously we're still in that meeting from the fourth. However, I will say that the motions on the dais right now that came today make me a little concerned because I don't believe, although it is appropriate to make them at this time. I don't believe that they have been um put out to the public at all. And I I I just Mr. Kirshner can't make the meeting tonight because he's in some remote part of Nebraska doing Mr. Kirshner stuff. Ms. Glass can't make the meeting tonight. Um and so this is my thought. Now, and and either way is it really is fine with me. But my thought is at this point we have two colleagues that could bring this back again on May 19th anyway, if they wanted to, if they didn't like the way motions went tonight. And they probably would. Instead of doing this last time and then tonight, and then on the 19th, we could make a motion, I could make a motion to s to allow us for this one time to send um reconsideration motions to the meeting on the 19th when everyone is here. Um, and then everyone who would be in the public who want to be part of this discussion could be back, whether it be conservationists or people that which Ms. DeCrony calls the industry or whatever. Either way, I really I just I have a feeling that we're gonna do something tonight, and then we're going to take a lot of time doing it, and then do it again in the 19th when Mr. Kirsthners back and Miss Glass is back, and it just doesn't make sense to me to do it twice. So I would be fine, you know, doing making a motion to say let's do it on the 19th. Um but if you all don't want to, don't. But I just I just I don't particularly I mean we're we are still in that meeting, not for these motions. We're still in that meeting because we had a closed session that we weren't going to have. And so I don't think anybody but the people who put the motion on the table and us who've seen them since since if they got test by 12 noon, were ready for this, and I'm not even sure how ready staff are for these motions right now because they were just completely completely unexpected to be honest. So that's my thought is to send this all to the 19th, because we're gonna do it again on the 19th any way possibly and probably um versus doing it tonight. So I I just kind of at a in a because we haven't called this meeting to public hearing to uh to into order first. Just I any thoughts on that? Any thoughts on that? Any thoughts on that? I'll continue in a sec. Mr. Crony. So um my concern would be that you know this is guidance, and uh we do have a very tight tight timeline to get the uh Zoam and CPAM done by the end of the year, so this will you know delay some time again that staff could be uh drafting some text. Um I I I did send uh my concern with one of the uh wrap-up motions to staff uh last Tuesday. So um staff has had my reconsider mo reconsideration motion for quite a while, and um I believe that they've seen some of the others as well. Um I mean I would I would I would tend to lean towards uh let's move this forward. You're right. This is guidance, but the staff's not going to do too much if they hear from uh other colleagues on not in the dais that they're gonna bring it back anyway. So either way, we'd still go. I mean, that's next Tuesday, so it's less than a week from now. And if my and if our colleagues bring it back, they're still not gonna do with anything on it's literally five days, and nothing would happen anyway within these five days because our meeting is next Tuesday. So, but you did, you're right. You're sending you sent this out. You sent this out. I'm not I'm not that's not I'm just trying to say uh you're you absolutely did, Mr. Crony. Absolutely. And and if and if we go ahead, fine.