Mesa City Council Study Session on Utility Rates and Employee Benefits - September 11, 2025
Mesa City Council Study Session – September 11, 2025\n\nThe Mesa City Council held a study session on September 11, 2025, to review the upcoming council agenda, discuss proposed water and wastewater capacity fees, receive presentations on utility rate adjustments for fiscal year 2025-26, and hear an update on 2026 employee benefits. Councilmembers Duff and Adams were absent and excused. The meeting opened with a moment of reflection honoring September 11 and recent political violence. No public comments were made.\n\n### Consent Calendar\n- The council reviewed the agenda for the September 22 council meeting. They directed that items 7A (Park North Fam multifamily) and 7B be removed from the consent calendar due to anticipated public interest. The developer requested the items be placed back on the agenda for a final action; staff confirmed the plan and development agreement had no substantive changes.\n\n### Discussion Items\n- Water and Wastewater Capacity Fees: Staff presented a proposal for a new one-time capacity fee to ensure growth pays for growth, as existing impact fees sunset in 2023–2024. The fee would be approximately $9,500 per residential equivalent (combined water and wastewater) for a ¾-inch meter. The fee is based on an incremental cost methodology using the AWWA M1 manual, supported by a $400 million growth-related capital plan over 10 years. The fee would generate about $18 million per year, placed in a separate fund for growth projects. Council discussed the calculation methodology, equity across meter sizes, comparison to neighboring cities (e.g., Phoenix ~$30,000; Tempe $4,400), and the need to avoid burdening existing ratepayers. There was discussion on why the fee was not implemented sooner and the importance of complying with ARS 9-511.01.\n- Utility Rate Adjustments (Water, Wastewater, Electric, Natural Gas, Solid Waste): Staff presented recommended rates for FY 2025-26 with and without the capacity fee. Key proposals included:\n - Water: Without capacity fee – residential tier one increase of 4% (4.5% service charge, tier two 5.5%, tier three 6.5%, tier four 7.5%, multi-unit usage 14.5%, commercial 14%, landscape 15%, large commercial 20%). With capacity fee – residential tier one increase of 3.5% (tier two 3.5%, tiers three and four 4.5%, multi-unit 12%, commercial 13%, large commercial 19%).\n - Wastewater: Without capacity fee – residential 8%, commercial 9%. With capacity fee – residential 7.5%, commercial 8.5%.\n - Electric: Proposed $1 service charge increase (down from $3 earlier), with tiered usage increases (summer tier one 2%, tier two 4%; winter tier one 5%, tier two 36% final year to achieve inclining rate). Average residential bill expected to increase $2.27/month (1.7%) but overall monthly bill projected to drop to $137.88 due to lower commodity costs.\n - Natural Gas: Service charge left at $0, summer tier increases unchanged (7% and 15%), winter tier one 7%, winter tier two increased 24% to better align with large users. Average residential increase $1.43/month.\n - Solid Waste: Residential 5.5% increase ($1.82/month to $34.99 for typical 90-gal service). Commercial 5.5% increase across bins and roll-off services. Bulk item pickup fee proposed to rise $2 to $31.\n- Equity Discussion: Council stressed achieving parity between residential and non-residential rates. Audit and Finance Committee recommended accelerating equity from FY 28-29 to FY 27-28. Staff modeled this with higher commercial increases (14% water without capacity fee) to avoid sticker shock. Council asked about landscaping rates being lower than residential tiers. Staff agreed to model a higher increase for commercial landscaping to provide flexibility.\n- Capacity Fee and Rate Link: If the capacity fee is adopted, the water and wastewater rate increases could be reduced slightly (e.g., residential water tier one from 4% to 3.5%). Council discussed how to present this to the public without confusion. Staff will include the capacity fee assumption in the notice of intent and set rates higher initially (without capacity fee) to allow council to later lower them if the fee passes.\n- Employee Benefits for 2026: Jan Ashley presented the benefits package. Changes include moderate premium increases (9% to 73% range across plans) and increased out-of-pocket maximums (deductibles, copays) to manage rising healthcare costs. Prescription drug plan design will be unified across all plans. Flexible spending account maximums increased (dependent care to $7,500/year). New vendor (The Standard) for life and disability insurance offers higher coverage at lower cost. Health and Wellness Center continues free primary/preventive care. Open enrollment runs October 1–15, 2025.\n\n### Key Outcomes\n- Council directed staff to:\n - Model a higher increase for commercial landscaping rates (above 15%) to provide flexibility for rate-setting.\n - Adjust the tier structure in the water rates with capacity fee to maintain consistent incremental percentages across tiers (e.g., 3.5%, 4.5%, 5.5%, 6.5%).\n - Present updated rate recommendations at the September 22 study session.\n- The notice of intent for utility rate adjustments and the capacity fee ordinance will be introduced on September 22, with a 60-day public comment period.\n- Council expressed general support for the capacity fee concept and the utility rate proposals, with further refinements to be discussed.\n- The benefits package will proceed as presented with no changes directed.\n- The September 18 study session will be replaced by a strategic planning session at the new Northeast Public Safety Facility.\n- Meeting minutes for the Historic Preservation Board and Economic Development Advisory Board were approved unanimously.
Meeting Transcript
Well, welcome everyone to our study session on September 11th. Uh beautiful morning in Mace, Arizona. We have Councilmember Duff and Councilmember Adams absent for the meeting, and they're excused. Other all other council members are there. Before we start, we'd like to uh like to say a few words about as we pause to remember the events of September 11th. Thank you for uh last week we had a moment of silence, but 24 years ago, uh those images are still with us today. Uh the bravery of the first responders, the resilience of our everyday Americans and the lives that were lost is a reminder of both our nations and our enduring strength that we stand together in light of the current events. Uh yesterday's assassination of Charlie Kirk and the political violence that's out there is so unnecessary. It is also a reminder that we must remain committed to unity, respect, and finding common ground, even in times of division. Violence has no place in our democracy, and we honor both the memory of 9-11 and those who have recently lost, especially Charlie Kirk and what his family's gonna go through. With that, with a somber meeting, we're gonna start uh today's council meeting. Uh item one is to review. I I hate even doing that after that statement, but uh item one is to review the agenda for uh next Monday's council meeting. Council. I made some notes. Uh 5D is an irrigation water delivery district and IWDD. Those are so necessary for these older uh subdivisions that allow them to do improvements in their irrigation districts as they age. Uh I believe we have 7A uh Park North Fam multifamily. I'm sure that might come off the consent agenda. Let's take 7A and 7B off consent. I know there's gonna be a lot of folks showing up on that meeting. Anything changed? No, nothing's changed. Nothing has changed at all. No. So what was the decision to put it back on if nothing has changed? Just because they want to move forward? Yeah, it was that. Yeah, we did a continuance. I know we did a continuance, but the goal was to maybe have a you know some coordination with the name of the Mary can clarify, but it was this was at the request of the uh of the landowner of the developer. That's correct, Scott. So uh Mayor, Council members, it was introduced and it was continued, and they have asked for it to be put back on the agenda for council to make a fun take a final action on it. We did um have several conversations with them about the different issues that council had brought up, um, but at this plan point the plan has not changed, and the development agreement um has not changed. There may have been some tweaks, but nothing really substantial has changed in the DA. And I'll make comments again. I'm just gonna make them shorter. Oh, the same comments as last time. So thank you, Mayor. You're welcome. Miss Spillsbury, answer your question. Yeah. Okay. Uh I know there's a question on 8A about multifamily, but uh Mary disclosed it is a platted now for sale project. Is that correct? That's correct. Okay. And looking forward to uh 9C, the price matter two. There was discussion on that the last uh introduction, so I'm sure that will come off good soon as well. So all right. Mayor, I will um highlight, of course, this is early, like we said, so if if council has any questions of staff, don't hesitate to to let us know during this um interim until we hesitate.
openpublica.com