OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Mesquite Technical Review Meeting Summary - July 15, 2025

City Council & CommitteesTuesday, July 15, 2025
BodyMesquite, Nevada
SessionCity Council & Committees
DateTuesday, July 15, 2025
StatusFILED
Video Record

STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE

Transcript — Verbatim
0:01

And welcome to our tech review on Tuesday, July 15th at 2 30.

0:07

We'd like to start with public comment.

0:09

If anybody has a comment, please step up.

0:10

You have three minutes and give us your name, please.

0:14

Okay, seeing in hearing none, we're just gonna move on to the consent agenda.

0:19

2.1 is consideration and approval of the Tuesday, June 10th, 2025 regular city council minutes, meeting minutes.

0:25

The Tuesday, June 24th, 2025 regular city council meeting minutes, the Tuesday, July 1st, 2025 tech review meeting minutes, and the Tuesday, July 22nd, 2025 regular city council agenda.

0:41

Let's go to 2.2 is consideration of approval.

0:45

A notification of budget transfers, B notification of budget amendments, C notification of bills paid and de purchase orders.

0:52

2.3 is our monthly financials.

0:55

And that's it for two.

0:57

So three.

0:58

3.1.

0:59

This is our public comment.

1:01

So on this, it's it's just a review of the upcoming agenda.

1:04

Right.

1:05

Right.

1:05

And so do we typically.

1:06

So it's it's good.

1:07

You can read through this item two.

1:09

Do we need to make any changes of this?

1:10

Is are we good to go?

1:12

Any any additions?

1:13

Okay, on to number three, but it's not the this is just a review of the upcoming meeting.

1:17

So we don't have we don't need to have public comment on each item.

1:20

That's gonna happen during the next meeting.

1:22

That's when this is just a review of if we need to make change to the agenda.

1:25

Yep.

1:26

As presented.

1:27

Thank you.

1:28

Thank you, Adam.

1:29

Okay, so three is resolutions and proclamations.

1:32

3.1 is consideration of approval of resolution R25-026, finding that the sale of approximately 15.26 acres of city owned property consisting of current Clark County's assessive parcel map as lot one of the certain parcel map file 130, page 73, also known as 800 Horizon Boulevard for economic development purposes, is in the best interest of the city of Mesquite.

1:57

3.2.

1:57

So I don't have to do that.

1:58

Yeah, and Patty, let me let me clarify too.

2:02

Um if anyone has come to make a public comment on any of these items, it's more than appropriate to do that because the way this is agenda is presented, right?

2:10

The public might be thinking that they're gonna have a chance to make a comment.

2:13

And so do open comment I would do that.

2:15

And then I a couple meetings ago, I talked about how we I'm gonna have some suggested changes where it would be clarify kind of how this would work.

2:23

And I'm still working on that.

2:24

Okay.

2:25

And it's gonna have another public comment.

2:27

Yeah, and then there'll be a public comment in the end.

2:29

We can comment on anything as well.

2:31

So I just want to make sure.

2:32

If anybody's here would like to comment on an item, please come up and we can hear that.

2:37

So my question is we typically do it at the end.

2:39

Do you want me to do it after each other?

2:40

I would just because it's been presented here where it has it.

2:43

You know, I'm kind of going back and forth.

2:44

Well, typically we don't have an audience, so there's obviously something okay.

2:48

So is there any public comment on 3.1?

2:51

Seeing and seeing none.

2:53

3.2 is consideration of approval of resolution R25-027.

2:57

Finding that the sale of approximately 15.26 acres of city owned property located at 800 Horizon Boulevard, consisting of current Clark County Assesses Parcel Map, designated at lot one of the certain person map, file 130, page 73, is regarding the disposal of real property for the purposes of economic development or redevelopment in accordance with Musquete City Charter Section 2-340.

3:22

Any public comment on that?

3:24

Okay.

3:34

Paul.

3:34

Okay, Paul.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Building Codes██████████████████████████████████████████42%
Procedural█████████████████████████████29%
Zoning████████████12%
Homeowners Associations████████8%
Infrastructure And Development███████7%
Economic Development██2%
Summary of Proceedings

Mesquite Technical Review Meeting Summary - July 15, 2025

The Mesquite City Council convened a Technical Review Meeting on Tuesday, July 15, 2025, at 2:30 PM in the Council Chambers. The council reviewed the upcoming regular city council agenda, moved eight building code bill introductions to the consent agenda, and heard public comments on pool safety, building code content, and the Golden Valley tentative map. The meeting adjourned at 2:59 PM.

Consent Calendar

  • Approval of minutes from the June 10, June 24, and July 1 meetings, and the July 22 agenda.
  • Approval of budget transfers, budget amendments, bills paid, and purchase orders (period June 24 to July 8, 2025).
  • Monthly financials. All items were approved without discussion.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Nick (resident): Expressed concern about safety of residential pools and spas, advocating for an annual inspection permit (e.g., $25 fee) to ensure locks, electrical connections, and fencing are maintained. He noted that some homes have pools that are unattended or unsafe. Council members noted that this is not part of the current code update and would require separate action.
  • Wes Grimuskeet (resident): Questioned whether the 2024 building codes contain political insertions (e.g., all-gender restrooms), urging council members to read the codes thoroughly before voting. The council acknowledged that public hearings will occur at the regular meeting.
  • Tom Bender (Stonehaven resident): Opposed the density of the Golden Valley tentative map (TM-25-004), which proposes 361 lots on 95.48 acres, resulting in a density of 3.78 units per acre. He requested a reduction to the original 306 units. Staff noted that the developer is negotiating with the HOA and may request a tabling.
  • Nancy Seck (Stonehaven HOA board member): Raised concerns about traffic impacts, estimating 3,400 car trips per day on two-lane roads. She also highlighted the dangerous intersection at Mesquite Heights Road and Canyon Crest, which is not a four-way stop. Staff responded that traffic studies are conducted periodically and that a signal may be needed in the future.
  • Jim Hawkett (Stonehaven resident): Asked about the types of homes (one- or two-story) and access roads. Staff replied that the Anthem at Mesquite PUD design standards apply.
  • Mickey Hookie (Stonehaven resident): Emphasized the need for intersection safety improvements, noting current traffic from the solar farm and future increases. Staff confirmed that the intersection will be monitored.

Discussion Items

  • Resolutions R25-026 and R25-027: Finding that the sale of 15.26 acres of city-owned property at 800 Horizon Blvd. for economic development is in the city's best interest and consistent with disposal ordinances. No public comment. These will be considered at the regular meeting.
  • Introduction of Bills (B25-006 through B25-013): Proposed updates to the city's building codes (Plumbing, Mechanical, Electrical, Pool, Energy Conservation, Existing Building, Residential, and Building) to the 2024 editions. Councilman Wanlis moved to move all eight items to the consent agenda for the regular meeting, citing routine updates. The motion passed unanimously. Public comments were heard but not discussed in depth.
  • Adoption of Bill B25-005: Amending the Palm Cove Planned Unit Development design standards to reduce required side yard setbacks from 6 feet to 5 feet. No public comment.
  • Administrative Items:
    • 7.1: Independent contractor agreement with Warren Hardy for legislative consultant services (July 1, 2025 – June 30, 2026).
    • 7.2: Resolution R25-024 transferring the city's 2025 private activity bond volume cap to the Nevada Rural Housing Authority.
    • 7.3: Approval of Senior Services Sub-Trust expenditures for the Senior Center.
    • 7.4: Tentative map TM-25-004 (Golden Valley) – subdivision of 95.48 acres into 361 lots. Staff reported that the developer is likely to request a tabling for one month to resolve density and conservation issues with the HOA. Council deferred substantive discussion to the next meeting.

Key Outcomes

  • The council voted to move all eight building code bill introductions (B25-006 through B25-013) to the consent agenda for the regular city council meeting on July 22, 2025.
  • The Golden Valley tentative map (TM-25-004) discussion was effectively tabled; the developer is expected to request a formal tabling at the regular meeting.
  • The council will consider the resolutions, adoption of B25-005, and remaining administrative items (7.1–7.3) at the July 22 regular meeting.
  • The mayor announced he will submit a pest control ethics question to the Nevada Ethics Commission for an opinion.

Meeting Transcript

And welcome to our tech review on Tuesday, July 15th at 2 30. We'd like to start with public comment. If anybody has a comment, please step up. You have three minutes and give us your name, please. Okay, seeing in hearing none, we're just gonna move on to the consent agenda. 2.1 is consideration and approval of the Tuesday, June 10th, 2025 regular city council minutes, meeting minutes. The Tuesday, June 24th, 2025 regular city council meeting minutes, the Tuesday, July 1st, 2025 tech review meeting minutes, and the Tuesday, July 22nd, 2025 regular city council agenda. Let's go to 2.2 is consideration of approval. A notification of budget transfers, B notification of budget amendments, C notification of bills paid and de purchase orders. 2.3 is our monthly financials. And that's it for two. So three. 3.1. This is our public comment. So on this, it's it's just a review of the upcoming agenda. Right. Right. And so do we typically. So it's it's good. You can read through this item two. Do we need to make any changes of this? Is are we good to go? Any any additions? Okay, on to number three, but it's not the this is just a review of the upcoming meeting. So we don't have we don't need to have public comment on each item. That's gonna happen during the next meeting. That's when this is just a review of if we need to make change to the agenda. Yep. As presented. Thank you. Thank you, Adam. Okay, so three is resolutions and proclamations. 3.1 is consideration of approval of resolution R25-026, finding that the sale of approximately 15.26 acres of city owned property consisting of current Clark County's assessive parcel map as lot one of the certain parcel map file 130, page 73, also known as 800 Horizon Boulevard for economic development purposes, is in the best interest of the city of Mesquite. 3.2. So I don't have to do that. Yeah, and Patty, let me let me clarify too. Um if anyone has come to make a public comment on any of these items, it's more than appropriate to do that because the way this is agenda is presented, right? The public might be thinking that they're gonna have a chance to make a comment. And so do open comment I would do that. And then I a couple meetings ago, I talked about how we I'm gonna have some suggested changes where it would be clarify kind of how this would work. And I'm still working on that. Okay. And it's gonna have another public comment. Yeah, and then there'll be a public comment in the end. We can comment on anything as well. So I just want to make sure. If anybody's here would like to comment on an item, please come up and we can hear that. So my question is we typically do it at the end. Do you want me to do it after each other? I would just because it's been presented here where it has it.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com