On March 19, 2026, the Milwaukee Administrative Review Board of Appeals (ARBA) convened at 9:04 AM in City Hall Room 301-B, with Chair Vincent Bobot presiding. The board considered 37 appeals concerning nuisance fees for tall grass, overhanging branches, snow removal, garbage/litter, reinspection, vacant building registration, chicken keeping permits, and board-up fees. Four members were present (Bobot, Yandell, Hammer, Bruzan) and one excused (Ald. DiAndre Jackson). The meeting adjourned at 12:24 PM.
All votes were unanimous (4‑0) with Ald. Jackson excused, except where noted. The board emphasized the need for better notification methods and encouraged property owners to sign up for e‑Notify.
Okay, uh good morning, everyone. My name is uh Vincent Bobbett. I'm the chair of the administrative review board of appeals. This is the hearing set for March 19th of 2026. Uh, as is our procedure, I'll just briefly go over it. The city uh always starts out the um hearing, give us an explanation of why those charges that are filing against the appellant are reasonable and according to the city ordinance. The appellant then will have an opportunity to question city witnesses as well as board members will question them. Then the appellant gets an opportunity to explain your case to the board. At this time, I'm going to welcome other board members that are with me. Uh and uh let's call case number two six zero zero five, the appeal of Charlie Clark, Prairie Park LLC for tall grass and weeds listen fees for 84 North 99 Street. Is Mr. Clark with us? Is Mr. Clark are you with us? Is uh Mr. Clark in the audience? No, sir. Okay. We'll pass this one slightly to see if Mr. Clark does come back at a later time. We always wait about 15-20 minutes. At this time, I'll call case number number two, the appeal of Mildred Ortiz for overhanging branches. Nuisance fees at 316 camera. Okay. At this time, I'm gonna recall number two. The appeal of Mildred Ortiz for overhanging branches nuisance fees. 3016 with St. Paul. Uh they're coming to the table, sir. Well, thank you so much. Good morning, Miss Ortiz. Can you hear me? Uh yes, my name is Python. Mildred Ortiz is my mother. I'm here on her behalf. So your mother is not here. Uh no, uh uh, she's 87 years old, and uh she's a heart patient, and she can't hardly hear, so I came on her behalf. Normally our procedure is that um you wouldn't be able to hear. Yeah, we're we normally do not uh she would have to hire an attorney. She would have to hire an attorney. Yes, it's not her tree. She's been charged for a tree that's not even her property. So she's being charged for something not hers, and now she's supposed to pay more for something that shouldn't have been done in the first place because somebody didn't recognize a tree didn't belong to the property that was overhanging. This tree is hanging across two properties. It's hanging across her property over to the property. Oh I have a video of the tree. Okay, hold on. Hold on a minute, sir. Who's representing the city on this case? I am Ben Brennan, City Markey Forestry.