Monterey Planning Commission Meeting, February 24, 2026
Monterey Planning Commission Meeting, February 24, 2026
The Monterey Planning Commission held a regular meeting on February 24, 2026, to consider a consent calendar and an architectural review permit for exterior alterations to a commercial building at 30 Wharf No. 1. The meeting included commissioner comments on staff work programs and regional development proposals.
Consent Calendar
- Item 2: Approval of meeting minutes.
- Item 3: Recommendation to City Council for Fiscal Year 2025-26 Non-Community Investment Program (NCIP) consistent with the General Plan.
- Both items were approved unanimously (6-0) after being pulled from the agenda along with Item 4, which was separately considered.
Discussion Items
- Item 4 – Architectural Review Permit ARP-25-0222 (30 Wharf No. 1): Senior Associate Planner Chris Schmidt presented the proposal for tenant improvements and exterior alterations to the former Scales restaurant building. The project involves a full interior renovation, new storefront glazing, replacement roofing, rooftop mechanical systems with screening, a new elevator, seismic upgrades, and a new paint scheme. The applicant, San Pedro Fish Market (represented by Jason McCarthy of Studios Architecture), described the family-oriented dining concept emphasizing a marketplace experience. Commissioners expressed strong support for revitalizing the prominent wharf location, noted the white paint scheme as a differentiator, and asked about corrosion prevention and lease terms (10-year lease with options). No public comments were received. The commission unanimously approved the permit (6-0), with the decision appealable to City Council within 10 days.
Commissioner Comments
- Commissioner David requested an update to the Recreation Trail Plan (last updated 30+ years ago) and inquired about pending work program items (housing element implementation, sea level rise analysis, local coastal program update). Planning Manager Levi Hill explained that staff resources are allocated by City Council and that the housing element implementation tasks are expected in summer, sea level rise analysis this year, and coastal program chapters for feedback.
- Commissioner David also raised the 711 Viejo Road project (Monterey County Builders Remedy, 11-13 story housing) and noted that the City Council had already authorized a letter of opposition at its February 17 meeting.
- Commissioner Palmer asked about the City’s relationship with MIIS (Middlebury Institute): property ownership (Middlebury owns buildings), no active discussions on future use post-closure.
- Commissioner Freeman followed up on a previous request regarding a missing garage door at the Marriott Hotel on Franklin Street; staff is researching original permits.
- Commissioners thanked neighborhood association members for participating in the NCIP process and commended property manager Jan Aldretti for securing the new wharf tenant.
Key Outcomes
- Approved consent calendar items 2 and 3.
- Approved Architectural Review Permit for 30 Wharf No. 1 (unanimous, 6-0).
- No formal actions taken on commissioner comments; staff noted ongoing work program items.
Meeting Transcript
How do we give us a hug Erica, would you please do a roll call and uh announce present staff and instruct viewers on how they can participate? Certainly uh today we have Chair Silva here, Vice Chair Latassa, Commissioner Bluth, Commissioner Freeman, Commissioner Palmer, and Commissioner Stoker. I'd like to note that Commissioner Pauli's absent today. Our staff members present, our planning manager Levi Hill, Principal Planner Fernando Roveri, Principal Planner Christy Sabdo, Senior Associate Planner Chris Schmidt, and myself, recording secretary Erica Brerek. Information on participating in this meeting and providing public comment, including remotely by Zoom or telephone is on this meeting's agenda, which is online at Monterey.gov forward slash agendas. Remote commenters will be muted until their turn to speak, and a timer will be shown on the screen. If you're connected on Zoom, the timer is accurate with no delay. In the chamber, we recommend keeping phones and devices muted to prevent audio interference with the meeting. Thank you for participating in your city government. Thank you, Erica. Um we'll uh start with the uh consent agenda. Levi, um point of order. Should I split up number two uh from three and four? Um I think uh it would probably be the easiest to ask if there's any members of the commission or members of the public that would like to pull one of the items from consent, since we're starting all items on consent. Uh if someone requests to have one pulled, then yes, it would make sense to take those votes separately. Is there anybody uh in chambers that would like to pull one of these items? Seeing nobody online, there are no attendees online. Any commissioners, very well. Um the additions to work one. I would like to as well, actually. So maybe we can um pull item number four and have a presentation, but before we do that, let's um uh take a uh a vote on items two and three. Um and just to go ahead and go back out uh for public comment, just uh another opportunity to see if we have any members of the public that would like to speak on the consent agenda uh consent agenda items. Um that would be the minutes, item number two and item number three uh recommendation for the city council that the fiscal year twenty-five twenty-six NCIP programs consistent with the general plan and all adopted uh city plans. I I thought I done or I did that. You did, but now that we've adjusted what the consent agenda is. Very technical. Don't want to have to come back through this. Okay. So let's let's uh um reset this. So if there's anybody in chambers or online that would like to uh speak before the commission on well, any of these items, you may do so. Anyone online? There are no attendees online. Okay, very well. Um let's uh take this back to the commission. And I agree, and maybe we can get a a motion in a second. But if we move for approval on the consent agenda uh for item number two, the approval of minutes and item number three, the fiscal year NCIP. But before we do that, should we get a motion in a second just to pull the the uh item number four off? I was doing the opposite or was just moving to approve those two items. Yeah, we don't need a motion to pull the item, um so that is a proper motion. Can I get a roll call, please? Sure. Chair Silva. Yes. Vice Chair Bluth. Yes. Commissioner Freeman. Yes. Commissioner Latassa. Yes. Commissioner Palmer?
openpublica.com