Special City Council Meeting on Governance Policy and Meeting Efficiency - May 27, 2026
Special City Council Meeting on Governance Policy and Meeting Efficiency - May 27, 2026
The Monterey City Council held a special meeting on May 27, 2026, to discuss and provide guidance on the council's governance policy, the agendizing process, and ways to improve meeting efficiency. Staff presented options for revising the current four-step agendizing process and enhancing meeting efficiency, including alternative Brown Act procedures. Public comment was heard, and council members debated various recommendations.
Public Comments & Testimony
- Many speakers opposed recommendation C (raising approval threshold to a majority of council), arguing it could disenfranchise minority viewpoints and undermine transparency.
- Several speakers supported recommendations A (prior consultation with city manager), B (staff impact estimates), and D (quarterly status updates).
- Some speakers opposed consolidating the two public comment periods into one, citing First Amendment concerns and the importance of accessibility.
- A speaker suggested prioritizing public safety items on the agenda.
- Several residents from Skyline Forest expressed frustration about the delay in addressing the Highway 68 intersection safety study, which was approved a year ago but has not moved forward.
Discussion Items
- Governance Policy Options: Staff presented the current four-step agendizing process (written request, verbal report, staff feedback, public comment, two-vote approval) and an alternative Brown Act policy allowing spontaneous requests during council comments. Staff recommended adopting four enhancements: A) require council members to consult the city manager before submitting a request, B) include staff impact estimates in written requests, C) raise approval threshold to a majority of council, and D) provide quarterly status updates on pending items.
- Meeting Efficiency Options: Staff presented several options: calling special meetings as needed, consolidating public comment into one session, starting regular meetings earlier (3 p.m.), holding closed sessions at different times (9 a.m.), moving ceremonial items to the consent calendar, and limiting outside presentations.
- Council Deliberation: Council members expressed support for recommendations A, B, and D. Most opposed recommendation C and consolidating public comment. Councilmember Garcia made a motion to switch to the Brown Act policy with the enhancements (A, B, D), add a third regular council meeting per month, and bring back more detailed policies on ceremonial items and presentations. The motion was seconded. After discussion, the motion failed due to a lack of consensus on adding the third meeting. No formal vote was recorded, and the council did not adopt a resolution.
- Second Agenda Item: The second item (crosswalk policy) was not heard because the meeting ran past the scheduled end time of 6 p.m. A motion to continue the item to the next meeting failed on a 2-2 vote.
Key Outcomes
- No formal action was taken on the governance policy or meeting efficiency recommendations. The council expressed general support for consulting the city manager, providing staff impact estimates, and quarterly updates, but no vote was held.
- The council did not approve raising the approval threshold to a majority or consolidating public comment times.
- The second agenda item regarding crosswalk policy was not discussed and will be re-agendized for a future meeting.
- The city manager provided an update on the Highway 68 intersection safety study, noting that Caltrans changed requirements and the study is on hold pending coordination with Caltrans and TAMC.
- The meeting adjourned without a clear decision on the governance policy changes.
Meeting Transcript
Um let's go ahead and call the meeting to order. Welcome everybody to our uh special council meeting today, May 27th, 2026. I'm gonna go to call the meeting to order and pass it to Clementine for roll call and to share announcements with the public. Councilmember Barber present. Councilmember Garcia. Here. Council Member Rash here. Councilmember Smith. Here. And Mayor Williamson. Here. And public comment and participation information is provided on this meeting's agenda, which is online at monterey.gov slash agendas. In person attendees, please keep your electronic devices and phones muted to prevent audio interference. Consistent with the First Amendment and the Brown Act, individuals have the right to speak at public meetings, which includes the right to criticize or support city policies or actions. The city encourages your uninhibited and robust feedback on public issues affecting the city. And we thank you for participating. Thank you, Clementine. And with that, we'll go ahead and do the Pledge of Allegiance, and I'll ask Council McGarcia to kick us off. Which stands under God. Thank you, Gina. All right. And with that, we will get to our public appearance item. Item one on the agenda is to review and provide guidance on council governance policy, agendizing process, and meeting efficiency. With that, I'll pass it to Dante for staff presentation. Thank you, Mayor. Uh this was uh an agenda item that was requested by council, and staff has taken some time to do some analysis. At this time, I'll turn it over to our assistant city manager Nat and also our city clerk, Clementine. Thank you very much, City Manager Hall. And good afternoon, mayor and council. Uh, we are here this afternoon to uh to talk about uh the first item on today's agenda, which is the uh governance policy and specifically the process by which you all, members of the city council bring items forward for discussion and deliberation for a future agenda. And uh also the second piece of this item will be to discuss different ways in which we can improve and enhance meeting efficiency within the within the city and the city council. So uh Clementine and I will be tag teaming this presentation. Uh she's done uh quite a bit of research on what some of the best practices are among local governments and cities and agencies throughout California. And uh based on that research as well as looking and reviewing internally our current process, uh, what are ways in which we can maybe do things uh slightly different? Uh what are option policy options for council as we look at uh variations to the agendizing process and then what are different ways in which we can uh maybe improve meeting efficiency. And um, we'll start with the uh couple of slides here and uh bear with me just a moment while I pull up uh pull up the slides. Hopefully, this comes up. Uh here we go. So the current policy. Let's start with the policy and the current policy in under which uh council members may agendize new matters. And uh it's a multi-step. Okay, location has been turned off. Thank you, Microsoft Edge. Okay. Um what we have here is uh a four-step process. Um a current policy in governance uh states that uh council members are to submit a written request up to 350 words that outlines what the request to agenda is is about, and uh that provides uh staff and council an understanding on uh what that request is. And then at the meeting under the section request to agendize, that's where the council member provides a three-minute or up to three-minute verbal report. Council members can ask questions. There's an opportunity for staff to provide feedback on uh potential timeline and time frame. The public has an opportunity to provide input or ask questions, and then uh with two yes votes, the item gets agendized to a future meeting.
openpublica.com