Fri, Nov 7, 2025·Mountain View, California·City Council

Mountain View Human Relations Committee Meeting — 2025-11-06

Discussion Breakdown

Immigration Enforcement61%
Community Engagement29%
Finance And Investments6%
Procedural2%
Affordable Housing2%

Summary

Mountain View Human Relations Committee Meeting — 2025-11-06

The Human Relations Committee (HRC) convened to approve prior minutes, receive an update from the Civic Participation Ad Hoc Committee, and hear an informational presentation from Deputy City Manager Kimberly Thomas on “Community for All” efforts and resources supporting immigrants amid changing federal immigration actions. The committee asked questions focused on federal grant conditions, planning for major 2026 events, coordination with schools, and how best to disseminate timely resource information.

Consent Calendar

  • Approved minutes for the September 4, 2025 regular meeting (motion passed with no nays).

Public Comments & Testimony

  • No public comments were offered in person or via Zoom on non-agenda items.
  • No public comments were offered on the Community for All informational item.

Unfinished Business

  • Civic Participation Ad Hoc Committee update (report only):
    • Committee members reported the ad hoc group has met about monthly since September and is adjusting its approach to data collection on civic participation in Mountain View.
    • Vice Chair Chadwell and Chair Poiton planned to distribute the ad hoc questions as an email survey to reach residents who do not attend regular meetings.
    • Committee Member Sylvester continued leading interview-based data collection.
    • The group planned to reconvene in December to organize collected data, identify themes, and develop insights for City staff to integrate into outreach and civic participation efforts.

Discussion Items

  • Informational presentation: Community for All programs supporting immigrants (Deputy City Manager Kimberly Thomas):

    • Federal landscape (as characterized in the presentation): reduced funding to agencies; sanctuary jurisdictions at risk of losing funding; federal grants (including CDBG and HOME) at risk of loss or having additional requirements; and restricted immigrant benefits affecting health/nutrition services.
    • County of Santa Clara actions (as described by the presenter): approximately $10 million in support, with about $8 million going directly to legal services; funding for essential services; and funding the rapid response network.
    • City of Mountain View initiatives and capacity:
      • Council adopted Community for All strategic policy goal in 2017.
      • Ongoing capacity building (e.g., Human Services Division; Housing Department; Multicultural Engagement Program providing information in English, Spanish, and Chinese, with Russian no longer automatically translated for all materials, but still provided as needed).
      • Community for All Grant Program: City provided $100,000 total; awarded $10,000 to five organizations (as stated in the presentation) to support outreach strategies to immigrant communities.
      • Examples of funded activities (project descriptions): quarterly immigration legal clinics; outreach to the Muslim community; free health screenings; navigation of health systems/basic essential services; community-led events (including Day Worker Center activities); and development of a mobile resource van (Stand 4).
      • Staff work underway: multi-department working group; monitoring federal actions; frontline staff training/protocols for possible federal immigration enforcement interactions; development of a Community for All action plan (early stages).
      • Mayor’s roundtable held with community organizations (County of Santa Clara, CSA MV/Los Altos, Day Worker Center, RAICES SV, Stand 4, and HRC Chair) to discuss gaps and needs.
  • Committee questions and stated positions/concerns:

    • Committee Member Smith asked about specific conditions tied to CDBG and HOME grants; staff indicated the City Attorney reviewed the language and suggested follow-up with Housing staff (staff offered to “ping” the Housing team for status/updates).
    • Committee Member Lester
      • Expressed appreciation for City efforts and stated a position that public outreach and the City standing strongly and loudly with its immigrant community is important.
      • Asked whether the Community for All action plan accounts for 2026 major events (FIFA/Super Bowl) and likely increased fear; staff said the action plan is early-stage, while broader county/city coordination was beginning.
      • Asked whether Mountain View has considered banning immigration enforcement in City buildings/properties (similar to County/San Jose actions); staff said the City had not looked at it specifically yet and would review feasibility.
    • Chair Poiton
      • Asked whether the City planned to increase Community for All grant funding given increased demand; staff stated $100,000 was already allocated, $50,000 had been granted (as described in the discussion), and the remaining balance would be awarded in a second phase (anticipated around January), noting demand had not been as high as before.
      • Asked about coordination with school districts to address fear; staff stated the City was not directly engaging on that topic but was receiving district policy updates, and that community organizations were better positioned to coordinate with schools.
      • Asked how the public/commissioners could stay informed; staff pointed to the City’s updated website resources and the City’s Council Connection newsletter, and noted County board agendas/work plans as another source.
    • Additional committee questions (speaker not clearly identified in transcript):
      • Asked about outreach regarding a December 31 deadline related to health coverage concerns; staff said information is shared through CBO networks and updated essential-services information shared monthly.
      • Asked how HRC members can help disseminate information; staff offered to coordinate with staff (via Laurel) to share relevant updates without overloading members.

Committee/Staff Reports

  • Chair Poiton reported on:
    • Participation in the Mayor’s roundtable and stated the discussion emphasized regional impacts (not operating in silos), concerns about ICE incidents (including impacts on children and targeted breadwinners), and emerging action items.
    • Attendance at a community “Cafecito” dialogue with Chief Canfield, describing the community’s concerns about law enforcement interactions with ICE and noting the Chief provided transparency, including a stated position (as relayed by the Chair) that City police will not get involved in immigration matters, while also clarifying there are circumstances when police work with HSI for other incident types.
    • Día de los Muertos event: reported rapid response network tabling, no ICE incident, strong attendance, and community appreciation for available resources.

Key Outcomes

  • Minutes approved for September 4, 2025 (passed with no nays).
  • No votes or formal actions on informational items.
  • Next meeting scheduled: December 4, 2025 at 6:30 p.m. (Plaza Conference Room, Mountain View City Hall, and via Zoom).

Meeting Transcript

All right, good evening, everyone. Uh I call this meeting to order. Welcome to the November 6th 2025 Human Relations Committee. Uh like to let the public know that we have agenda copies available for the public, uh, should you choose to get one. Uh I'll now tell the principal management analyst to take it to my roll call. Thank you, Chair. Committee member Lester. Here. Committee member McDonald's. Committee member Smith here. Committee member Sylvester. Here. Committee member Webb. Here. Vice Chair Chadwell. Here and Chair Poiton. Here. Thank you. Moving on to item three, minutes approval. The minutes for September 4th, 2025. Regular meeting have been delivered to the committee members and posted on the city hall bulletin board. If there are no corrections or additions, a motion is in order to approve these minutes. So move. Second. Thank you. Got it. Committee member Lester and second by committee members Ida Rose. Um all in favor say aye. Okay. No nays. Motion carries. Moving on to item four oral communications from the public. This portion of the meeting is reserved for persons wishing to address the committee on any matter not on the agenda. Each speaker has up to three minutes to make their comments. State law prohibits the committee from acting on non-agenda items. For those attending the meeting via Zoom, please use the raise your hand function or press star nine on your phone to make a comment on any item not on the agenda. The committee will receive in-person comments first. Seeing none. Do we have any online? Seeing none. Okay. And we'll close item four. Moving on to unfinished business. No action will be taken on this item. Thank you, Chair. Um the Civic Ad hoc particip uh civic participation ad hoc committee has been meeting um I think at least once a month since September. Um and we kind of regrouped uh when we realized that our a lot of our schedules were um super busy and we wanted to find new or wanted to explore different opportunities of collecting data um on civic participation in the city of Mountain View. Um so Chair Poicon and I are going to be working on um distributing our questions that we developed in a survey format to various email lists. There are also some organizations and groups that do civically engage but don't have regular meetings. Um so we figured that using email distribution lists could help us reach folks that don't um meet regularly or perhaps um don't have the same opportunity to um get out in the community and interview with us and then committee member Sylvester has been taking the lead on continuing the original format that we were using, which is interview.