Tue, Nov 18, 2025·Mountain View, California·City Council

Council Appointments Advisory Committee Meeting Summary (2025-11-17)

Discussion Breakdown

Parks and Recreation42%
Community Engagement36%
Procedural16%
Sustainability and Resilience5%
Personnel Matters1%

Summary

Council Appointments Advisory Committee Meeting (2025-11-17)

The Council Appointments Advisory Committee met to approve prior minutes, interview applicants for one vacancy each on the Senior Advisory Committee and Parks & Recreation Commission, and forward appointment recommendations to the City Council. No public comment was received.

Consent Calendar

  • Approved minutes (Motion: Showalter; Second: Ramos; unanimous).

Public Comments & Testimony

  • None (no in-person or virtual speakers on minutes, oral communications, or committee openings).

Discussion Items

  • Interview process (Council Policy K-2): Panel interviews; same questions for each applicant; randomized round-robin order; limited clarifying questions.

Senior Advisory Committee (1 seat; committee discussed overall membership needs)

Applicants interviewed: Michelle McGuire, Madhu, Maricela Paris.

  • Michelle McGuire expressed a desire to give back as a retiree, citing volunteer work at the Senior Center and service on Sourcewise advisory efforts; identified transportation and food needs; expressed interest in creating a centralized resource hub so seniors know where to get answers (housing, rent stabilization, health, etc.).
  • Madhu expressed a desire to support seniors, focusing on care, connection, and reducing loneliness, including strengthening intergenerational/family connections and helping connect seniors to resources.
  • Maricela Paris expressed a desire to organize and advocate for seniors, drawing on professional experience in home- and community-based services and long-term supports; identified needs including housing, food security, and transportation; emphasized partnerships and coalition-building and interest in potential policy/advocacy approaches.

Committee deliberation themes:

  • Members praised the applicant pool and stressed the importance of minimizing vacancies.
  • Committee members highlighted strengths of McGuire (direct Senior Center involvement, enthusiasm, lived connection to senior issues) and Paris (professional expertise in services and supports).
  • Staff noted McGuire had also agreed to serve as the City’s representative to Sourcewise (three-year term beginning July 1, 2025), which members discussed as a potential factor in maximizing engagement.

Parks & Recreation Commission (1 seat; term ending 2029)

Applicants interviewed: Sarah Dondish, Renee Fitzsimons (via Zoom), Sumesh, Ben, Ida Rose.

  • Sarah Dondish expressed strong interest in improving dog park attention and described a focus on execution and individual-level engagement, emphasizing that equity/sustainability should not lose sight of individuals.
  • Renee Fitzsimons expressed interest in applying experience in land use/environmental planning and Open Space District programming; emphasized Biodiversity and Urban Forest Plan implementation, collaborative partnerships, expanding parks in underserved areas, and the importance of organizational capacity/workforce resilience.
  • Sumesh emphasized funding needs (stating he briefly scanned the plan and saw “$750,000” as what is needed, and believed costs could exceed that), collaboration/strategic alliances, and incorporating global park design ideas; highlighted connectivity and sustainability in priorities.
  • Ben emphasized being a longtime resident and heavy user of parks/trails; expressed interest in contributing, increasing participation, and strengthening community ownership/volunteerism and sponsorships.
  • Ida Rose emphasized equitable distribution of parks and amenities, investment in existing facilities (accessibility, shade, restrooms, sustainable landscaping, connected trails, modern playgrounds), and environmental sustainability (tree canopy, biodiversity, climate resilience); also raised concerns about funding and staffing constraints, noting uncertainty pending the Nexus study next year.

Committee deliberation themes:

  • Members were impressed by Fitzsimons’ and Ida Rose’s preparedness and policy-level focus.
  • Members noted all applicants recognized sustainability as a major parks priority and several raised volunteerism/ownership.
  • The committee discussed encouraging non-selected applicants to remain engaged through neighborhood associations and ongoing strategic plan engagement, and noted future commission openings in 2026, 2027, and 2028.

Key Outcomes

  • Recommended appointment to Parks & Recreation Commission (1 seat; term ending 12/31/2029): Ida Rose (unanimous; Motion: Showalter; Second: Ramos).
  • Recommended appointment to Senior Advisory Committee (1 seat; term ending 12/31/2029): Michelle McGuire (unanimous; Motion: Showalter; Second: Ramos).
  • Recommendations to be presented to City Council at the December 16 meeting.
  • Meeting adjourned at 7:08 p.m.

Meeting Transcript

Okay, are you ready? Pat, you ready? Okay, great. All right, so it's six o'clock, so we'll call the meeting to order. Welcome to the Council of Appointment Reviews Committee Meeting of November 17, 2025. We'll move on to item two, which is our roll call. Committee member Ramos? Here. Committee member Showalter? Here. Here. May? Here. All right, so now Cora moving on to item three, approval of minutes. Item 3.1 are our minutes. would any member of the public joining us virtually or in person like to provide comment on this item if so please click the raise hand button in zoom or submit a blue speaker card to the deputy city I can't see. Should I log in? No, there's no one. Okay, perfect. Thank you. All right. So there's no in-person or virtual public comment. So we'll close public comment. Is there a motion in a second to approve? So moved. Not fancy. So motion by committee member Showalter. And then seconded by committee member Ramos. So all of them just raise our hands. It's unanimous. Great. So we'll move on to item four, oral communications from the public. Would any member of the public joining us virtually or in person like to provide public comment? There's still no one. Okay. So we'll close oral communications and we'll move on to item five, our new business. Item 5.1 is committee openings. Deputy City Clerk Wanda Wong will make brief remarks and then we will proceed with review and selection of interview questions. Good evening. Just want to let you know that all the applicants will be attending in person with the exception of Renee Fitzsimons, PRC applicant, who will be attending via Zoom. And Sarah Dondish has not arrived yet. She told me today that she was going to be here. Okay. So we'll go through the questions and see if they arrive in time and everything. All right. Would any member of the public joining us like to provide comments on the opening? None. All right. All right. So per the selection process outline in Council Policy Number K-2, interviews will be conducted in a panel format. Applicants will be interviewed in groups by body.