Mountain View Bicycle/Pedestrian Advisory Committee Meeting - April 30, 2026
Mountain View Bicycle/Pedestrian Advisory Committee Meeting - April 30, 2026
The Mountain View Bicycle/Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC) met on April 30, 2026, to discuss the public draft of the Active Transportation Plan (ATP), Middlefield Road Complete Streets project, and appoint a representative to the VTA Bicycle & Pedestrian Advisory Committee. The committee unanimously approved the consent calendar and heard extensive public comment on both the ATP and Middlefield Road.
Consent Calendar
- Meeting Minutes (February 25, 2026): Approved unanimously via consent calendar.
- Fiscal Year 2026-27 Capital Improvement Program (CIP): Approved via consent calendar. The committee supported active transportation projects for inclusion in the city's CIP.
- Transportation Development Act Article 3 Funding: Approved via consent calendar. The committee recommended allocating accumulated TDA Article 3 funds to Interim Pedestrian Mall Improvements (Castro Intersections), Project 23-49.
Public Comments & Testimony
- Active Transportation Plan (Item 6.1): Ten members of the public provided comments, both in person and virtually. Speakers expressed general support for the plan but highlighted implementation gaps, the need for measurable outcomes, adoption of modern design standards (e.g., NACTO, 10-foot lane widths), stronger policies, and better integration with paving plans and safe routes to school. Several speakers urged inclusion of mid-block crossing policies, protected bike lane enforcement, and a progress dashboard.
- Middlefield Road Complete Streets (Item 6.2): Eleven members of the public commented. Many speakers criticized the road diet analysis for focusing exclusively on level of service (LOS) and queuing without considering mode shift, demand destruction, safety benefits, or VMT-based analysis. Several advocated for permanent 24/7 bike lanes, a road diet (even partial), and protected intersections. Concerns were raised about pedestrian crossing safety, ADA compliance at curb ramps, and emergency vehicle access.
- VTA BPAC Appointment (Item 6.3): No public comment.
Discussion Items
- Active Transportation Plan—Public Draft (Item 6.1): Assistant Public Works Director Allison Boyer and Tracy McMillan (Nelson Nygaard) presented the ATP public draft. The plan identifies over 100 projects, prioritizes them using criteria based on guiding principles, and outlines policies and programs. Committee members asked clarifying questions on project rescoping from 2023, trail extensions (e.g., Stevens Creek), curb adjustment costs for class IV bikeways, pedestrian walking speed standards, and connectivity issues with existing multi-use paths. Committee members expressed reservations about the policy section being too vague, lacking specific metrics, and not referencing modern design standards such as NACTO or DIB 94. A motion to recommend the ATP to the Council Transportation Committee with a note that BPAC has reservations in the areas of policies, metrics, and standards was made by Member Barton, seconded by Member Stone, and passed unanimously (5-0).
- Middlefield Road Complete Streets, Project 22-01 (Item 6.2): Associate Civil Engineer Hoa Nguyen and Adam Merrill (Siegfried Engineering) presented the concept design. The project includes resurfacing Middlefield Road from Moffett to Bernardo, class IV protected bike lanes, and intersection improvements. Staff evaluated a road diet (reducing from two lanes to one lane per direction) and concluded it would cause significant LOS and queuing deficiencies at multiple intersections, potentially impacting emergency response times, and not recommended it. Committee members questioned the traffic analysis methodology (use of LOS instead of VMT, lack of mode shift or demand destruction assumptions), the feasibility of partial road diets, and the need for protected intersections. Several members expressed frustration that the analysis was one-sided. Staff stated that redesigning the project to include a road diet would jeopardize grant funding and the construction timeline. No formal motion was made, but comments will be reported to the Council Transportation Committee.
- VTA BPAC Appointment (Item 6.3): The committee considered nominations for Mountain View's representative to the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority's Bicycle & Pedestrian Advisory Committee for the term July 1, 2026 – June 30, 2028. Chair Kuszmaul expressed willingness to serve a full term. A motion to recommend Chair James Kuszmaul to the City Council for appointment was made by Vice Chair Bonte, seconded by Member Huang, and passed unanimously (5-0).
Key Outcomes
- Consent Calendar: Approved unanimously (5-0), including February 25, 2026 meeting minutes, support for CIP projects, and TDA Article 3 funding allocation.
- Active Transportation Plan: Recommended to the Council Transportation Committee with a note that BPAC has reservations about policies, metrics, and standards (motion 5-0). Staff will incorporate feedback and return for a final recommendation in August 2026.
- Middlefield Road Complete Streets: No formal recommendation made; all comments will be forwarded to the Council Transportation Committee for their May 5, 2026 meeting. The project design will proceed without a road diet to maintain grant deadlines.
- VTA BPAC Appointment: Unanimously recommended Chair Kuszmaul for appointment by the City Council (5-0).
- Next Meeting: Scheduled for Wednesday, June 24, 2026, at 6:30 p.m., where the committee will review the draft work plan, collision data update, and OBAG4 complete streets checklists.
Meeting Transcript
Pad present, I think our poll is being to order. Can we do the role? Yes. Uh Vice Chair Bonti. Uh Chair Barton. Member Barton. Sorry, sorry. Member Barnes. Former chair. Um member Hong. Oh, take home. And member Stone. Present. All present. Right, great. That moves to item three, which is for oral communications from the public. This portion meeting is third person's wishing to address the committee on any matter not on the agenda. Um, or full portions of public comment in this meeting, we will be limiting ourselves to two minutes given the larger than normal number of public commenters we seem to be having. Um participants will be limited to two minutes and state law code of the committee from acting on non-agenda items. Do we have any members of public in the room who want to speak to non-agenda side? Do we have any members of the book online who want to speak to that? Great. That will close general public comment. We will now move to the consent calendar. Um any member of the committee wants to poll any of the items, they can uh be aware that we have a lot on the agenda, so be careful about doing that. Um there any clarifying actually actually does any member of the committee want to pull any item that items from I would like to pull item 4.3 uhless and involves people who would happen to be here anyways or um uh yeah, so I think if you would like to pull it and add it at the end of the agenda, we could do that. I'm because I'm inclined to put it at the like if we're pulling. I just had a question about it. It's just a clarifying question. I don't think we need to pull. Okay. Okay. Yeah. Right. Um, then clarifying questions on any of the consent comments. Yeah, I guess my question is since the CM3 report has a recommendation and alternatives. My assumption would be moving it will be the same as supporting the staff recommendation. Staff recommendation. That is correct. All right, which is the cast for the speaking. Okay. That was my question. Okay. Great. Then we don't uh yeah, nothing that we are supposed any recommendation that's listed on the agenda, which is recommend to the city council to allocate the accumulated transportation development. So for the Castro intersection project. Okay. All right. Are there any members of the public in the room who would like to speak on the consent calendar? Do we have anyone online who has raised their hand who would like to speak on the consent?
openpublica.com