Tue, Sep 30, 2025·Napa, California·City Council

Nomination Committee Interviews for Advisory Committees - September 30, 2025

Discussion Breakdown

Parks and Recreation48%
Active Transportation19%
Community Engagement14%
Procedural13%
Economic Development3%
Arts And Culture2%
Transportation Safety1%

Summary

Nomination Committee Meeting for Committee Appointments

The nomination committee, comprising Vice Mayor Laros and a Councilman, conducted interviews for vacancies on the Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee and the Parks, Recreation and Trees Advisory Committee. Applicants presented their qualifications and perspectives on community issues, followed by questions from committee members and a ranked voting process to recommend appointments.

Discussion Items

  • Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee Interviews:
    • Robert Reber (incumbent) expressed full support for cycling and pedestrian safety initiatives, citing his professional background in city planning and advocacy roles. He emphasized the importance of community outreach through field tours and addressing challenges in implementing new street designs.
    • Clay Newton stated interest in both committees but preferred Parks, Recreation and Trees. He highlighted the need for safe corridors and connectivity between parks and bike networks, describing Trancas as a scary place to ride.
    • Virginia Hill (Jinny) expressed passion for trail systems and community engagement, linking outdoor access to mental health and recovery. She emphasized advocacy and education to adapt to new infrastructure.
    • Brendan Baker argued for improved walkability and tree management, sharing personal experiences with dangerous crossings and urban blight. He supported Measure G outreach to maintain momentum for improvements.
    • Julianne Reta was absent and not interviewed.
  • Parks, Recreation and Trees Advisory Committee Interviews:
    • Joe Strang (incumbent) stated no conflict in serving simultaneously as board president of the Napa Parks and Rec Foundation, highlighting synergies in fundraising and prioritization. He emphasized community engagement and resource allocation challenges.
    • Kimberly Alkowski (via video) expressed interest in playground projects and tree inventories, offering a background in horticulture and education. She noted ability to attend via Zoom due to travel.
    • Mary Ann Glenn advocated for diverse age engagement in parks and balancing tree care with water conservation, based on her biology training and personal use of city amenities.
    • Clay Newton reiterated his focus on connectivity and user experience research, suggesting short-term goals in community awareness and long-term diversity in representation.
    • Brendan Baker emphasized interconnectivity of trails and parks, calling for better public engagement to guide recreation programs.

Key Outcomes

  • Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee Recommendations: After ranked voting (scale 1-5, 5 most qualified), Robert Reber scored 10 and Virginia Hill scored 8. The committee recommended reappointing Robert Reber and appointing Virginia Hill as new members.
  • Parks, Recreation and Trees Advisory Committee Recommendations: After ranked voting (scale 1-6, 6 most qualified), Joe Strang scored 12, Mary Ann Glenn scored 9, and Clay Newton scored 8. The committee recommended appointing Joe Strang, Mary Ann Glenn, and Clay Newton to two-year terms, with Mary Ann and Clay designated as members with demonstrated experience.
  • Next Steps: Recommendations will be forwarded to the full City Council for approval on either October 7 or October 21, 2025, pending staff processing.

Meeting Transcript

We should probably use our microphones so you can hear. Can I ask a request? And it's up to you if you want to do it or not. But we have three people who applied for both committees. And I was thinking we should make them say which one they would rather do. I think that's great. And our author, I think we're missing one of the people. So we have then. For logistics, I think. Sorry to butt in. For logistics, I think we can have the applicants when you're when you're up, come if you go up the ramp here and just sit in the in the chair in the middle, maybe just so you're a little closer, and then everyone can see and hear you as well. Do we want to ask them which one they prefer before we have them come up or just ask them with the water? Okay, perfect. And are we just going in order as we interview? The interviews are just done in the order that the applications were received. So we will have to do start with the bicycle and pedestrian advisory committee. So we'll just have you start by telling us a little bit about yourself and why you would like to be on this committee. Thank you, Vice Mayor Laros. Thank you, Councilman. As I like to say, I've been an avid pedestrian since age one. Uh literally on Main Street at the junction with the Vine Trail. So it's been a great place to raise my sons and for them to be able to explore our neighborhood and beyond and take in a lot that uh Napa has to offer. It's uh also been a great way to see firsthand experience firsthand the challenges as a pedestrian and as a cyclist. Um, so that's sort of my motivation and part for uh serving on the on the B-Pack. Uh, my professional life, I was uh for many years a community development director and city planner, so that's where the the perspective I bring and working with city staff and projects, trying to uh work collaboratively across planning, parks and rec, uh, public works, uh, elected officials such as yourselves to try to advance projects. Uh, and since stepping away from full-time work a couple years ago, I've really immersed myself in advocacy for cycling and pedestrians, not just here on this commission, but I'm also the vice president of the Napa County Bicycle Coalition. I've been on the working group for the Vision Zero group with NBTA, and uh it's now listed on my application, but I recently joined the um Napa River Line um nonprofit as a as a board member. So that's my involvement, and uh I've really enjoyed the past two years. I think we've done some good work, much with the support and enabling of of the council and staff. Uh, I think there's some momentum that we can really build on, and I hope to continue doing that. Go ahead and open it up to questions. All right. Well, thank you, Robert, for your application and for all of your work in the community. Um I love that you're on the River Line project. That's gonna be really cool. Um I wanted to ask you, you said in your application um the general public, which, despite the best outreach efforts, are often absent from these discussions. And that's something that is uh a priority of the council of focus area for us right now. Do you know of or can you think of ways that we could be better about how we get people more involved in the conversation about what our community looks like? Yeah, that's a that's a great question. It's it's funny you mentioned it because we as the Riverline uh group, we just went over to Petaluma to meet with their nonprofit group for their park that they're trying to develop in the center of their town there and the outreach they did, and their message was very much meet people where they are. So it's going to their schools, their churches, their locations, at times of their convenience and preference. You know, a lot of times we we have our set schedules as commissions or council members, uh, you know, it's tough getting everybody together uh just on from an elected official standpoint or um a staff standpoint, but those times and venues often don't work for the people who will be affected by the project. So I think not just doing the outreach, hey, there's a mean finding ways to actually go to them. Um sometimes, like with our projects, it could be organizing walking tours before projects are implemented where you invite, say uh residents on a weekend to go tour, and then they can give you their perspective in the field. I think that's something important for everybody, no matter who you are. It's you know, we're we it's easy look on Google Maps or Street View and and it saves us trips, but it's not the same as being in the field. So I think that that's one example I think that we could improve on. Sure. Mine's a two-part question. Having served on the committee, what has been uh most exciting to you?