Wed, Jan 21, 2026·Napa, California·City Council

Parks, Recreation & Tree Advisory Commission Regular Meeting (2026-01-21)

Discussion Breakdown

Parks and Recreation56%
Community Engagement16%
Environmental Protection11%
Procedural5%
Public Safety4%
Engineering And Infrastructure4%
Fiscal Sustainability2%
Affordable Housing1%
Personnel Matters1%

Summary

Parks, Recreation & Tree Advisory Commission Regular Meeting (2026-01-21)

The Commission heard a detailed annual update from the Napa County Resource Conservation District (RCD), received major updates on the City’s new Harvest property acquisition and next-step planning process, reviewed key sections of the Urban Forestry Management Plan draft, and received Parks/Recreation maintenance updates (including Napa Lighted Art Festival timing and recent tree-planting outcomes). The meeting ended with a brief Park & Rec Foundation fundraising report.

Consent Calendar

  • Approved prior meeting minutes (motion and second; approved by voice vote).

Public Comments & Testimony

  • No public comments were provided on non-agenda items.

Discussion Items

  • Napa County RCD annual projects update (staff presentation and Q&A)

    • RCD described volunteer and stewardship programming with City Parks (e.g., Green Friday oak planting at Alston Park; MLK Day ivy removal along the Napa River Trail; recurring French broom pulls at Westwood Hills).
    • RCD described coordination work including the revived Napa Weed Management Area (grant-funded; emphasizing countywide coordination and education rather than direct treatment) and advisory work related to an upcoming countywide IPM policy.
    • RCD and City discussed fuels reduction and forest health planning at Westwood Hills Park, including planned French broom treatment methods (cut/pile/pile burn and “flaming” re-sprouts with a torch) and community education/outreach.
    • RCD reported Alston Park planting outcomes and constraints, including tree survival figures “about 16% survival of trees planted over the last 11 years,” noting this was characterized as better than the “15% is the norm” for wildland restoration without irrigation; discussed vole damage and mitigation efforts.
    • RCD discussed a draft Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) for the City of Napa (in translation to Spanish; anticipated to go to City Council in spring for adoption).
    • Commissioner questions focused on: historic fire history at Westwood/Alston; control/lease status of the Caroline Park nature center building; what type of agency RCD is and how it is funded; whether donations are tax-deductible; and what “flaming re-sprouts” means.
  • 6A: Harvest property acquisition update (City staff report and Q&A)

    • Staff reported the City closed mid-December (recorded “December 12th”) and reopened the site for public use starting early January.
    • Current interim operations: City is operating the small gym, large gym, synthetic turf field, track, and two natural baseball fields; reservations accepted through June 30 on a rolling six-month basis.
    • Demolition: Staff emphasized the former school buildings are an “attractive nuisance” with vandalism concerns; reported City Council allocated $5 million (approved at the prior day’s council meeting) to proceed with demolition and leave funding to begin planning/design.
    • Site/buildings: Staff indicated the old gym may remain pending cost feasibility for rehab/renovation versus rebuild; the new gym is in good condition and planned to remain.
    • Community engagement plan: Staff outlined a four-phase approach (Connect; Outreach/Consult; Involve/Collaborate; Share Leadership), noting Phase 1 work already completed (statistically valid survey, in-person meeting, leadership alignment workshops, and a bilingual citywide survey with 1,500+ responses).
    • Schedule: RFP released for an architectural planning/design firm; staff stated Council could potentially award the agreement as soon as May 5, with Phase 2 engagement likely around August (avoiding peak summer).
    • General Plan: Staff stated the adopted General Plan calls for 2.53 acres of high-density housing on the 27-acre site (remaining acreage oriented to public recreation).
    • Operations/resourcing: Staff described added limited-term staffing and maintenance resources to manage the new 27-acre site and planning workload; noted the community’s top ask in surveys was a pool, and that future operations (e.g., lifeguards) would need planning once scope is known.
    • Revenue: Staff stated the complex could offset some expenses in revenue but would not fully cost recover; subsidy was described as coming from Measure G.
    • Solar: Staff reported the City acquired a solar field on site and transferred the purchasing power agreement; intent is to keep it operational as long as feasible, depending on final design/phasing.
  • 6B: 2026 Commission goals and work plan (discussion)

    • Staff noted vacancies (down to two positions plus absent member) and that interviews for new applicants were tentatively scheduled for February 9 (including a student applicant); chair/vice chair/BPAC rep selection deferred until new members are seated.
    • Commissioners requested:
      • Keep at least two park tours in 2026; expressed interest in touring Harvest.
      • Add a standing agenda readout from the Park & Rec Foundation rather than a formal annual presentation.
      • Continue interest in Placer.ai (or similar) annual park usage/engagement reporting.
    • Staff provided status on the “Playable Arts” project: site preparation completed; weather and footing redesign delayed installation; equipment fabricated in Berlin and delivered; installation crew remobilizing the following Monday; timeline shifted toward April. Staff stated community feedback was incorporated to fully enclose the play area and that a restroom is funded for design and construction.
  • 6C: Urban Forestry Management Plan update (draft 2 excerpts; feedback sought)

    • Staff presented the plan as a 40-year roadmap; reported Draft 2 is an 85-page version with visuals/tables; commissioners were asked to review and comment on the executive summary, vision statement, and goals/recommendations.
    • Key stated metrics and scope:
      • 21.5% canopy coverage (presented as “a very, very respectable number”).
      • 34,000 trees inventoried under City jurisdiction (parks/streets/medians), while canopy assessment includes trees on private property.
    • Vision framework: “four Ps” — Preserve, Protect, Promote, Plan.
    • Implementation framing: goals labeled with departments involved, a timeline bucket (in progress / 1–3 years / 4+ years), and funding intensity ($ to $$$).
    • Discussion/feedback highlights:
      • Commissioners asked about inventory completeness; staff clarified 34,000 reflects City-managed trees (not all trees citywide).
      • Commissioners asked about the plan’s approval pathway; staff indicated it is intended as a guiding document shared with Council, and not necessarily formally adopted, though commissioners suggested formal adoption could signal stronger commitment and support funding/climate alignment.
      • A wording issue was flagged (“planning process started in January 23 and commenced in March of 26”); staff clarified March 2026 is the grant completion deadline and agreed the sentence needs clarification.
      • Commissioners asked how implementation funding and timing would be tracked; staff said funding would likely be sought via specific tasks/projects and the annual budget cycle, noting an additional $250,000 annual allocation to parks/community landscaping as baseline funding intended to help implement plan elements.
      • Commissioners raised whether the City should maintain canopy or aim to grow it; staff explained constraints (e.g., narrow planter strips, infrastructure conflicts, PG&E line-clearance) and emphasized maintaining canopy and leveraging education/partnerships given most canopy is on private property.
      • Commissioners raised “wrong tree, wrong place” replacement opportunities; staff stated they have data on mismatched trees and about 3,000 planting opportunities identified on City-jurisdiction land, but removals/replacements would be driven by health/infrastructure conflicts and available resources.
      • Climate resilience: commissioners asked whether species selection accounts for future climate suitability; staff described DRG’s broader candidate list, staff experience, nursery availability, and intent to update the master tree list as conditions change, emphasizing diversity (102030 rule) to reduce pest risk.
  • 6D: Park maintenance & recreation division updates

    • Napa Lighted Art Festival: started Saturday; runs about 30 days through mid-February; projection sites run 10 days only, with the final projection night identified as the upcoming Sunday.
    • Tree/streets project: Coomb Street rehab reported 47 trees removed and 57 replanted (24-box size) to address neighborhood aesthetics; project near completion (punch list).
    • Arbor Day/planting: referenced successful planting at Vineyard Park (grant-funded) with volunteers in heavy rain (details consistent with RCD’s earlier remarks).

Key Outcomes

  • Minutes approved by voice vote.
  • Harvest: City confirmed acquisition closing and reopened the site for public use; staff outlined near-term demolition planning (following Council’s $5 million allocation) and a multi-phase community engagement and design process targeting two concept designs by end of 2026.
  • 2026 work planning: Commission direction to maintain multiple park tours (including interest in Harvest), add a standing Park & Rec Foundation update item, and continue data-focused reporting (Placer.ai) where available.
  • Urban Forestry Management Plan: Commission provided feedback on draft excerpts (including suggested clarification edits and discussion of adoption/commitment approach); staff to proceed toward Draft 3 and return with the full plan.

Additional Reports

  • Park & Rec Foundation: reported $6,625 from 55 donations via Give Guide plus $3,000 additional donations, totaling $9,625 attributed to Give Guide participation.

Meeting Transcript

2026 regular meeting for the Parks Recreation and Tree Advisory Commission. Could I have roll call, please? Board Donald. Here. Richard. Here. Wallace. And Stokes is absent. Thank you. So for agenda review, we have a presentation from the Napa County Resource Conservation District. It looks like we have a handful of administrative reports. 6A is harvest property acquisition. 6B discussion on the 2026 goals and work plan. 6C's urban forestry management plan update. And 6D is park maintenance and recreation division updates. Do we have anybody from the public who wishes to speak on any items that are not on the agenda? We don't take phone calls right. Anybody like to make a motion? I'll move to approved minutes. All in favor say aye. Second over there. Yep. Bye. Okay, moving right along. Next up is a presentation from the RCD on their annual projects update. I don't know. Do I need to turn this on? I just turned it's on, I think. Well, I just should I put Should I put theirs up or I'm the old guy that barely I just hit control delete when I have their mics on, but I don't have control of the PowerPoint. Or do I? No, I don't think so. So R C D PowerPoint. This is mine and Jeff's. Okay, thank you. Ashley and I will be giving this presentation together, so we'll be kind of swapping out periodically, but I'll kick us off. Next slide. So today we wanted to give kind of a general overview of different ways we've been working with the city and accomplishments over the last year. Ashley will talk a bit about our community stewardship programming. We'll both talk a bit about other ways we've been working on coordination planning and implementing projects at a variety of scales. And then we'll also talk about a few other partnerships with other city departments. So I'll hand it over to Ashley. So kicking it off right away with our volunteer events. Um we partner with the City of Napa Parks and Mark Department quite a bit on different forest health-related events. Um the first one is one of our largest events um every year. Um that's our Green Friday event. It happens the day after Thanksgiving. Um and traditionally this is an oak planting event um at Alston Park. Um it's very popular with the community. We've had families that come back year after year and they go back and look at the tree that they planted, you know, the year before, two years before, five years before. So it's extremely popular.