Napa Planning Commission Regular Meeting - January 21, 2021: Selection of Chair, Marvin Gardens Approval, and Administrative Reports
STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE
Napa Planning Commission Regular Meeting - January 21, 2021
The Napa Planning Commission held a regular meeting on January 21, 2021, at 5:30 PM via teleconference due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The meeting included the selection of a new Chair and Vice-Chair, approval of a consent calendar, a consent hearing item continued to a future date, a public hearing for the Marvin Gardens Parcel Map which was approved 4-1, and administrative reports on the 2021 calendar and a review of commission bylaws and the Brown Act.
Consent Calendar
- Planning Commission Minutes (November 5, 2020): Approved unanimously. Commissioners Hewther and Masaro abstained due to not being present at that meeting.
Consent Hearings
- Modrall Tentative Map Extension – 45 Los Robles Drive (PL18-0079): Staff recommended continuing this item to a date uncertain because the previously approved tentative map had expired, and a new application would be required. No public comment was received, and the commission accepted the staff recommendation without a vote.
Public Comments & Testimony
- Marvin Gardens Parcel Map (132 Tyson Court): Two public comments were submitted:
- Amy Baker (homeowner at 130 Tyson Court): Expressed concerns via email about parking, traffic, noise, light, drainage, garbage location, and lack of electric vehicle/solar provisions. She requested mitigation measures and noted that the development could reduce property values.
- Jeff Baer (homeowner on Tyson Court): Spoke in opposition, citing decreased property values, increased traffic and noise, inadequate parking (noting that garages are often used for storage), and questioned the zoning change from R1 to multifamily. He argued the project's density and unit sizes are incompatible with the neighborhood and requested the construction of 2-3 single-family homes instead. He also criticized the noticing process (short notice, incorrect meeting location).
Discussion Items
- Selection of Chair and Vice-Chair: The commission followed the annual rotation precedent. Commissioner Heather nominated Commissioner Paul Kelly for Chair and Commissioner Reed Oñate for Vice-Chair. The motion passed unanimously. The new Chair and Vice-Chair then assumed their roles for the remainder of the meeting.
- Marvin Gardens Parcel Map (File No. PL20-0094):
- Staff Report (Bond Mendez): The project involves subdividing a 0.5-acre parcel into four lots and constructing four duplex units (8 total units) at 132 Tyson Court. The site is zoned multifamily (RM) with a density of 15-20 du/ac, allowing up to 10 units. The applicant proposes 8 units, meeting minimum parking requirements (18 spaces including garages and guest parking). Staff recommended approval based on findings in the resolution, determining CEQA exemption under CCR Section 15332 (Class 32, in-fill).
- Applicant Presentation (Joe Rossi): Rossi stated the design intends to fit the neighborhood with a single-family appearance while meeting density goals. He highlighted the inclusion of workspaces for home offices and emphasized the quality of construction. He noted the project is for sale, not rental.
- Commission Deliberation:
- Commissioner Hewther: Expressed strong support, praising Rossi's track record and the project's innovative design. He criticized the quality of the renderings (calling them “cartoonish”) and suggested staff mandate higher-quality visualizations for future projects.
- Commissioner Masaro: Supported the project generally but voted against it due to concerns that the combination of colors, materials, and articulation was too bold and inconsistent with the subdued character of the neighborhood. He suggested the project “pushed the envelope too far” and recommended more subdued colors and materials.
- Commissioner Hurtado: Supported the project, noting it fits well with the surrounding area and provides needed infill housing. He agreed with Hewther on improving renderings.
- Vice Chair Oñate: Supported the project as good infill housing, commending the architecture and layout.
- Chair Kelly: Supported the project overall but expressed concern about the size of Lot 1 (Plan A) adjacent to the neighbor to the east. He considered a motion to modify the site plan to use Plan C for all lots, but after discussion and lacking support from other commissioners, he voted yes on the final motion.
- Motion and Vote: Commissioner Hewther moved to approve the project, including CEQA exemption, design review permit, and tentative parcel map. Seconded by Commissioner Hurtado. The motion passed 4-1, with Commissioner Masaro voting no. Chair Kelly voted yes despite his earlier concerns.
Administrative Reports
- Review of 2021 Planning Commission Calendar: Staff presented the proposed meeting schedule for the year. The commission noted potential holiday conflicts (e.g., July 4th) but accepted the calendar as presented.
- Annual Review of Planning Commission By-Laws & Brown Act: Staff attorney Sabrina gave an overview of Policy Resolution 10, the Brown Act, conflicts of interest laws (Political Reform Act, common law bias, city charter gift prohibition), and serial meeting risks. She emphasized the importance of disclosing ex parte communications, avoiding serial meetings, and forwarding public communications to staff. The commission asked clarifying questions, including whether two commissioners can meet with an applicant (yes, less than a majority) and how to handle applicants disclosing other commissioners' views. The presentation was informational; no action taken.
Key Outcomes
- New Leadership: Paul Kelly was elected Chair and Reed Oñate Vice-Chair for 2021.
- Consent Calendar Approved: Minutes from November 5, 2020, approved.
- Modrall Tentative Map Extension: Continued to a date uncertain; staff to work with applicant on a new application.
- Marvin Gardens Parcel Map Approved (4-1): The commission determined the project was exempt from CEQA and approved the tentative parcel map and design review permit. Commissioner Masaro dissented citing aesthetic concerns. No modifications to the project were adopted.
- 2021 Calendar Received: No formal vote; commission acknowledged the schedule.
- Bylaws and Brown Act Training Completed: Informational; commissioners were reminded to contact staff with any conflict questions.
- Future Agenda Items Discussed: Staff noted upcoming meetings on the General Plan update (including land-use classifications and Regional Housing Needs Allocation numbers) and anticipated monthly meetings. Commissioners expressed interest in a future discussion about raising standards for application renderings and materials.
Meeting Transcript
Briefly when we get to that section of the agenda. Okay, we can begin the meeting because it's 5 30. Cool beans. Am I can I see everybody? Hold on. Ricky. All right. Read. All right. Right on. Here we go. Oh, Ricky. Right on. Look at all those pretty faces. So let me just uh drum roll, please. So we start by saying good evening and welcome to the January 21st, 2021, City of Napa regular meeting for the Planning Commission. So call to order, and maybe we could do roll call, please. Commissioner Hurtado. Here. Commissioner Masaro. Here. Commissioner, gotta get them all. Present. Vice Chair Kelly. Present. Chair Heather. Happily amongst the living. Thank you. So really what I'd like to do is first welcome and congratulate Commissioners Masaro and Hurtato. Right on you guys. That was some pretty rough competition. So careful what you wish for. Um, but we're super happy to have you. Um I know that um maybe some people assume that I would just be reappointed. I didn't assume that. Um, every time I have to go up there, I get a big old lump in my throat and I would get all worried and stuff, but go figure. I'm still with you. So the um I don't know, Bob or Ricky, do you guys want to make any comments um before we start the show? We've just welcomed you and congratulated you. Ricky, got anything? Yeah, no, I just want to thank you, Chair, for for the introductions and um, you know, city staff. I look forward to be working with every single planning commissioner and help support our community with this new role. So thank you very much. Amen. Commissioner Masaro. I'm very pleased to I'm very pleased to be here, and I I've had a great orientation from staff, and I feel well prepared and gonna follow uh my my the lead of the chair, vice chair, and read and learn all about how to do a good job. Cool. Well, to do that uh to wit. Um we uh it's time, it's actually that time, speaking of chair and vice chair. So how it's been going for as long as I can remember and before um the a chair, the chair, a vice chair, the vice chair serve for one year, and it's now that time to do it again.
openpublica.com