Napa Planning Commission Regular Meeting - January 18, 2024
STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE
Napa Planning Commission Regular Meeting - January 18, 2024
The Napa Planning Commission held a regular meeting on January 18, 2024, at 5:30 PM in City Hall Council Chambers. The meeting covered administrative reports on the commission's roles and responsibilities, an annual review of the Brown Act and conflict of interest laws, and the election of a new chair and vice chair. No public hearings or consent hearings were held.
Consent Calendar
- Approval of December 21, 2023 Minutes: Approved unanimously with one abstention (Commissioner Myers, who was absent at the prior meeting).
Public Comments & Testimony
- No public comments were made during the designated public comment period. A reporter from the Napa Valley Register introduced herself at the beginning of the meeting but did not address any agenda item.
Discussion Items
- Election of Chair and Vice Chair: The commission moved this item to the beginning of the agenda. Commissioner Massaro nominated Commissioner Shotwell for Chair and Commissioner Kelley for Vice Chair. The nominations were seconded and approved unanimously. Beverly Shotwell was elected Chair, Paul Kelley Vice Chair.
- Planning Commission Roles & Responsibilities (Item 8A): Planning Manager Ricky Caperton presented an overview of the commission's duties as defined in the Napa Municipal Code, Policy Resolution 10, and the commission's bylaws. He highlighted the advisory role to the City Council on land use and planning, and the decision-making authority for permits and design review. Discussion included the commission's design review function, the ability to attend Council meetings as private citizens, and the process for requesting staff reports. Commissioner Kelley expressed concern that the commission's role has become less defined over time. Commissioner Huether asked about sharing information with other commissioners, and City Attorney Sabrina Wolfson advised that disseminating materials to a majority of commissioners via email outside of a meeting would constitute a serial meeting violation.
- Annual Review of Policy Resolution 10, Brown Act & Conflict of Interest Laws (Item 8B): Deputy City Attorney Sabrina Wolfson presented a refresher on the Brown Act, serial meetings, ex parte communications, and conflict of interest laws, including the Levine Act (campaign contribution restrictions). Key topics included:
- Serial meeting prohibition: serial meetings can occur through direct communications (e.g., phone calls, forwarded emails) or through intermediaries (e.g., an applicant sharing opinions between commissioners).
- Exceptions to the Brown Act: individual contacts, conferences, meetings of other legislative bodies, and social gatherings (e.g., the Kiwanis crab feed) are permitted as long as no specific commission business is discussed.
- Social media: commissioners may post about commission business, but other commissioners cannot comment or like such posts.
- Conflict of interest: real property interests within 500 feet require recusal unless clear and convincing evidence shows no measurable impact; properties between 501 and 1,000 feet require recusal only if the decision affects development potential, character, or market value.
- Government Code 1090: prohibits city officials from being financially interested in city contracts, but advisory bodies like the Planning Commission have more flexibility if the contract is outside their subject matter jurisdiction.
- Local gift prohibition: city charter prohibits accepting gifts from persons doing business with the city.
- Commissioners discussed the implications of a commissioner's abstention (counted with the majority) and indemnification in case of litigation. The city attorney offered to follow up on the indemnification question.
- Commissioner Comments: Commissioner Massaro questioned the $100 meeting stipend, noting it has remained unchanged for 20 years. Commissioner Huether requested an update on the storage facility project (Pueblo site) for the next meeting, citing concerns about the final design not matching the commission's recommendations. Planning Manager Caperton agreed to provide the approved plans and a summary of conditions. Commissioner Shotwell asked about funding for the Planning Commissioners Academy, and Caperton indicated funds are available upon request.
Key Outcomes
- Election of officers: Beverly Shotwell elected Chair, Paul Kelley elected Vice Chair. (Unanimous)
- Consent Calendar: December 21, 2023 minutes approved (one abstention).
- Administrative Reports: Received and filed; no formal action required.
- Directives: Staff will provide the approved plans and conditions for the Pueblo storage facility for the next meeting. The city attorney will follow up on commissioner indemnification questions.
- Next meeting: February 1, 2024, at 5:30 PM in City Hall Council Chambers.
Note: The agenda listed the meeting date as January 18, 2024, but the transcript begins with "January 16th." The summary follows the official agenda date.
Meeting Transcript
Okay, ladies and gentlemen, welcome to the January 16th City of Napa regular meeting of the Planning Commission. Like to call this meeting to order and ask staff to conduct roll call. Commissioner Huther. I'm present. Commissioner Kelly. Surprisingly, I'm still here. Commissioner Myers. Present. Vice Chair Shotwell. Present. And Chair Masaro. Present. What's the stand for the Pledge of Allegiance, please? I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America. And to the Republic for which it stands. One nation underdog, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. Amen. Before we get to the agenda review, I want to officially welcome Commissioner Myers back to the fold. Thank you. And Commissioner Kelly and Shotwell to another appointment, another two-year appointment. So welcome back. Not too much. Staff, are there any changes to this evening's agenda? I have none. I like to make a change. I like to move the um election of chair and vice chair up to uh public comment, which we won't following public comment, which I don't believe we're gonna have tonight. I have no objection. Okay, very good. So um right, so I see no public comment. I see no public. I think at this point we can there's no reason why we can't do the vote now, correct? Okay, so let's do it. Um I enjoyed my year as chair. It's over. Now it's time to uh vote for a new chair and a vice chair. Do we have any motions? I would like to. Yes, sir. Go ahead. I would like to nominate vice chair Shotwell to chair position and uh Commissioner Kelly to vice chair position. Sounds good. Do we have any other motions for any other candidates? I was considering nominating Commissioner Myers to uh vice chair a little fresh. You've already served three years. Um what do you do now? Well, we have a motion, let's take the motion for chair. Okay, we have one candidate for chair. Are there any other candidates for chair? Okay, do I have a second on the motion for vice chair Shotwell to move to the chair position? Do I have a second?
openpublica.com