Napa Planning Commission Meeting Summary - June 4, 2026
Napa Planning Commission Meeting Summary - June 4, 2026
The Napa Planning Commission held its regular meeting on June 4, 2026, beginning at approximately 1:30 PM (though the transcript indicates an evening session). The meeting included approval of consent calendar items, two public hearings—a bed-and-breakfast use permit for 845 Jefferson Street and a public art design review for Le Petite Elephant at 15 Chapel Road—as well as staff reports and commissioner updates. Notable actions included forwarding a recommendation to the City Council for the bed-and-breakfast, approving the public art installation, and addressing procedural discrepancies regarding agenda item re-assignments.
Consent Calendar
- Approval of Minutes: The Planning Commission regular meeting minutes for May 7, 2026, were unanimously approved.
- Consent Hearing – Item 6A (Feast It Forward Temporary Use Permit, 728 First Street): The item was approved unanimously without discussion. This occurred despite an earlier motion (approved 3-0-2, with two abstentions) to move item 6A to the public hearing; staff had originally recommended moving item 6B to the public hearing. The commission proceeded to approve 6A on consent and then began public hearings with item 7A.
Public Comments & Testimony
- Item 6B – Public Art Design Review, 15 Chapel Road: Two members of the public spoke in opposition:
- Ty Fam, representing the Alta Heights Neighborhood Coalition, argued that the proposed art pieces do not meet the city’s definition of “public art” because they are not “clearly visible from the street” due to topography and distance, and that the concrete footings and electrical infrastructure were installed before the review. He requested that the applicant be required to pay the 1% fee into the city’s public art fund instead.
- Laura Courthel, a resident of 677 Montecito Boulevard, raised safety concerns about the art’s location near the pedestrian gate, questioning whether there is adequate width for emergency evacuation of children. She suggested alternative placement on a pedestrian access off Montecito.
- Item 7A – Bed-and-Breakfast (845 Jefferson Street): No public comments were received.
Discussion Items
-
Item 7A – Use Permit for Four-Guest-Room Bed-and-Breakfast at 845 Jefferson Street:
- Staff presented the proposal to convert the historic Henry J. Manasseh House (a Prairie-style local landmark) from a commercial office to a bed-and-breakfast with four guest rooms, a manager’s unit in the basement, and exterior restorations (including window replacement, chimney rebuilding, and new railings more consistent with original design). The project requires a use permit and a certificate of appropriateness (the latter to be approved by the City Council based on a Cultural Heritage Commission recommendation). Staff found the project consistent with city policies and recommended forwarding approval to the City Council, with findings that the use is compatible and CEQA-exempt (Sections 15301 and 15331).
- Applicant Michael Clark (owner and designer) provided additional context, including recent discovery of architect William H. Corlitz’s signature on a wall panel, reinforcing historical significance. He emphasized restoring the original layout and historic features.
- Commissioners expressed unanimous strong support, praising the preservation of a rare Prairie-style building, the alignment with bed-and-breakfast rules, and the applicant’s investment. Commissioner Ebach noted a preference for housing but acknowledged the costs of restoration and the net gain of one dwelling unit. Commissioner Myers raised a parking concern about backing into spaces on one-way Second Street; staff noted that an exception from public works standards was already reviewed and deemed safe.
- A motion to forward a recommendation to the City Council to approve the use permit and CEQA exemption passed unanimously.
-
Item 6B – Design Review Permit for Two Public Art Pieces (Barrel Rings) at Le Petite Elephant, 15 Chapel Road:
- Staff (Angela) presented the proposal to install two repurposed wine barrel ring sculptures (by Napa artist Gordon Heuther) on either side of the pedestrian gate entrance at the daycare campus. The art is intended to satisfy the city’s public art ordinance requirement for a previously approved project. Concrete pads and electrical were already installed under a separate building permit. Staff recommended approval, noting that the art is visible from the public right-of-way (though not immediately from Montecito Boulevard due to topography) and that the commission could suggest alternate locations.
- Artist Gordon Heuther spoke, emphasizing his expertise and that the pieces were donated. He argued the location is ideal as a gateway and that safety concerns are unfounded (space between pieces allows vehicle passage).
- Commissioners recused themselves: Commissioner Shotwell (client of Le Petite Elephant) and Chair Owen (to avoid bias). Commissioner Myers disclosed email correspondence but did not recuse. Commissioner Ebach and Masaro voted.
- Discussion included safety (egress width), visibility, and the precedent of public art on private property (e.g., wineries, apartment courtyards). Staff confirmed the pads do not impede the pedestrian path and that fire marshal reviewed egress. Chair Owen expressed initial pause about attracting public to a nursery school but was reassured that the art sits outside the gate. Commissioner Ebach noted the art could be seen from the street and supported the project, calling it a “slam dunk.”
- A motion to approve the design review permit and CEQA exemption passed (voice vote, with recusals).
Key Outcomes
- Bed-and-Breakfast (Item 7A): The Planning Commission voted unanimously to forward a recommendation to the City Council to adopt a resolution approving a use permit for a four-guest-room bed-and-breakfast at 845 Jefferson Street and determining the project is exempt from CEQA.
- Public Art (Item 6B): The Planning Commission (with two recusals) approved a resolution granting a design review permit for the installation of two public art pieces at 15 Chapel Road and determining CEQA exemption.
- Consent Items: The May 7, 2026 minutes and the temporary use permit for Feast It Forward were approved.
- Procedural Note: There was an inconsistency between staff’s recommendation to move item 6B to the public hearing and the subsequent motion (and approval) to move item 6A to the public hearing. Ultimately, item 6A remained on the consent calendar and was approved, while item 6B was heard as a public hearing later in the meeting.
- Staff Reports: Updates were provided on the new GIS zoning map, upcoming housing projects, the zoning ordinance update (public draft in ~2 weeks), a planned study session in July on the ordinance, Bottle Rock outreach improvements, two summer interns, and updated application instructions.
- Commissioner Comments: Commissioner Shotwell reported attending a North Bay Healthcare community breakfast and expressed optimism about the acquisition of Providence/Queen of the Valley.
Meeting Transcript
Good evening, welcome to the June 4th, 2026 City of Napa regular meeting for the Planning Commission. I would like to call this meeting to order and ask Myra to conduct a roll call, please. Commissioner Ebach. Present. Commissioner Masaro. Present. Commissioner Shotwell. Present. Vice Chair Myers. Present. And Chair Owen. Present. We will now rise for the Pledge of Allegiance. I pledge allegiance to the United States of America. And to the Republic for which it stands under God. The Planning Commission conducts all meetings in accordance with the Ralph M. Brown Act and pursuant to the city's rules of order for planning commission meetings. Staff, are there any changes to this evening's agenda or any supplemental reports? Yes, in light of correspondence received, we are recommending removing um item six B and moving it to public hearing. And then there have been four supplemental memos that have been conveyed to the commission. Thank you. And yes, we I received those. So do we need a motion to move item six A to the public hearing? Yes. So moved. Can I get a second? Second. All those in favor? Aye. Aye. Abstain. I guess I should abstain too. Abstain. Public comment provides an opportunity for members of the public to directly address the planning commission on items of interest not otherwise noted on the agenda. Each speaker's comments will be limited to three minutes and will comply with the rules of order for planning commission meetings. Do we have any members of the public who wish to provide public comments on non-agenda items? Okay, consent calendar. These routine items may be approved by a single vote. However, any member of the public or commissioner may remove an item for consideration during the public hearing portion of the agenda. This evening we are reviewing the Planning Commission regular meeting minutes for May 7th, 2026. Is there a motion to approve the meeting minutes for May 7th, 2026 planning commission regular meeting? So moved. Second. All those in favor? Aye. Aye. Motion passes. Consent hearings. These items must be noticed as a public hearing, and any member of the public or commission may remove an item from the consent hearing calendar, and the item will be considered during the public hearing portion of the agenda. Tonight we still have on the consent hearing item 6A, feast it forward temporary use permit 728 First Street.
openpublica.com