The Newark Municipal Council held a special meeting on August 8, 2023, at 10:00 AM in the Council Chamber. The meeting included votes on numerous resolutions, ordinances, and public comment. Key actions included approvals of health insurance brokerage contracts, redevelopment investigations, ceremonial street designations, and the advancement of ordinances on tax abatements and armed security guards. The 2023 municipal budget was deferred pending state review, and a crucial redevelopment agreement extension failed to pass.
8th, 2023. In accordance with New Jersey law, adequate notice of this meeting has been provided to the Starledger, the Jersey Journal, and the public at large establishing the date, time, and location of this meeting. In addition, the agenda for this meeting was disseminated on August 4th 2023 at the time of preparation and posted on the website of the City of Newark. Roll call, please. Council? Present. Absent. Gonzalez. Present. Ellie. Absent. Here. Here. Scott Roundtree. Present. Silva. Absent. President McIver. Present. Council President, Council Members, we are on page four of the agenda. Items 7R1AS and 7R1BS need to be amended on the floor. They are both exceptions to public bidding instead of extraordinary unspecifiable services. A is to provide health insurance brokerage services for prescription and dental. And B is to provide health insurance brokerage services for prescription and magna care. Thank you, Madam Clerk. Any questions regarding the amendments from council members? Yes. Councilman Ramos. Yeah, thank you, Madam President. Just have a few questions about the process that led the administration to recommend the two entities before us. I know in the past, well, at least the last contract for brokerage services was done under, I believe, an emergency contract, and this is a result of some kind of competitive process that your office followed. So can you kind of walk us through what that process entailed and why are you recommending the two entities that are before us today? Yes, Councilman Remos. Um so the last contract that was done was also that broker was solicited through EUS as well. The extension was done on an emergency basis. Oh, I'm sorry, Tiffany Stewart, personnel director. My apologies. Good morning, counsel. Um the process that was used this time, initially we went out for an RFQ. Um that was in May, and uh we received several responses from the RFQ. However, there were some deficiencies and things like that. Because of the timeline that we were under, the the statute does allow for the city to utilize EUS to procure those services, and so we utilize the EUS to do that. Um so we first went out via RFQ, and then we were advised that we should just utilize the EUS. A few other questions, Madam President, if I can. Sure, Councilman Remove. Um so is here based on the two that are on the agenda and one that's an added starter. You're you're recommending three different um firms to to provide services for your off for your the department. Um what's the why why the need for three different companies? So there are two reasons for that. The first reason being that when we initially went out via RFQ, part of the reason we went out for our via RFQ as opposed to utilizing EUS, which we could have done, um, is because we wanted to attract uh a greater uh diversity of brokerage firms.