New Bedford Ordinance Committee Meeting: August 25, 2025 – Use Table, Special Permits, and Body Art
New Bedford Ordinance Committee Meeting: August 25, 2025
The Ordinance Committee met on Monday, August 25, 2025, at 7:00 PM in City Council Chambers to discuss three major agenda items: a proposal to remove the City Council as the granting authority for special permits for automotive uses, a review of the Body Art Ordinance, and a public hearing on updates to the Zoning Use Table. The meeting lasted until 8:58 PM and was live-streamed.
Discussion Items
1. Removal of City Council as Granting Authority for Automotive Special Permits (Item 3)
- Overview: Clerk Dennis Farias introduced a motion to amend Chapter 9, Appendix A, Section H to remove the City Council as the special permit granting authority for automotive sales/rentals, body repair, general repair, and light service. He noted the current process is cumbersome, with fees of $700–$900 and a lengthy timeline involving multiple referrals and a 20-day appeals period. The Licensing Board does the investigative work, while the Council only provides initial approval.
- Council Positions: Several councillors (Abreu, Oliver, Lopes, Giesta) opposed removing the authority, arguing that the Council represents constituents and addresses quality-of-life issues. They noted that the Council provides a public forum and that losing this authority would weaken their ability to respond to neighborhood concerns. Councillor Abreu highlighted the value of media coverage and public attendance at Council meetings versus Licensing Board meetings. Councillor Morad and Burgo supported the change, citing redundancy and the burden on businesses. Commissioner Romanowitz explained that the special permit process originated in 2003 to give the Council oversight, and that the Council can still revoke permits or attend Licensing Board meetings.
- Outcome: A motion to table the item failed (4-7). A motion to refer the item to the full City Council with a recommendation of no further action passed (8-3).
2. Body Art Ordinance Revisions (Item 4)
- Overview: Councillor Lopes requested a review of the Body Art Ordinance (Section 4200) to update provisions for industry concerns. The Planning Board held a hearing and recommended removing the separation distance requirement from churches but maintaining other distances (schools, child care). Stephanie Sloan (Health Department) stated no concerns as long as health requirements are met. Commissioner Romanowitz noted only minor complaints since 2003.
- Council Positions: Councillor Lopes made a related motion to strike the word "church" from the separation distance section (Section 4220). Councillor Burgo opposed, arguing that the Council should not remove protections for neighborhoods. After debate, the related motion failed (3-8). Subsequently, a motion to take no further action on the original motion and recommend to the full City Council passed unanimously (voice vote).
3. Public Hearing on Zoning Use Table Changes (Items 1, 1A, 2)
- Overview: The committee held a public hearing on a motion to amend the Definitions, Section 1200, and Appendix A (Use Table) of the City Code. Assistant City Planner Mike McCarthy presented a detailed overview of changes, including new use categories (e.g., hostels, brew pubs, food halls, marine recreational uses) and refinements to existing ones. The presentation covered residential, lodging, commercial, retail, eating/drinking, motor vehicle, civic, industrial, and marine uses.
- Council Questions: Councillors raised concerns about short-term rentals (Airbnb), the distinction between hostels and Airbnbs, the impact of mixed-use zoning on neighborhoods (Councillor Baptiste), and the preservation of the working waterfront (Councillor Giesta). Councillor Morad requested a detailed list of changes to approving authorities and zones. The chair noted that any amendments would require new hearings based on legal advice.
- Outcome: The hearing was continued to the next Ordinance Committee meeting on Monday, September 29, 2025, at 7:00 PM. The Planning Department will provide requested information. No final action was taken.
Key Outcomes
- Item 3 (Automotive Special Permits): Referred to full City Council with recommendation of no further action (8-3).
- Item 4 (Body Art Ordinance): Related motion to strike "church" failed (3-8); original motion referred to full City Council with recommendation of no further action (passed unanimously).
- Items 1,1A,2 (Use Table): Public hearing continued to September 29, 2025; no vote taken.
The meeting adjourned at 8:58 PM.
Meeting Transcript
Good evening, ladies and gentlemen. It is 7 p.m. on Monday, August 25th. I am Chairman Ryan Pereira calling together this committee on ordinances meeting. Um live here in the city council chambers. I am joined by my colleagues Councillor at Large Ian Abreu, Councilor Ward 2, Maria Giesta, Councilor of Ward 1, Leo Schocat, Councillor of Ward 5, Joseph Lopes, Councillor at Large, Brian Gomes, Counselor at Large, Linda Morad, Councillor at Large, Naomi Carney, Councillor of Ward 3, Sean Oliver, Counselor of Ward 4, Derek Baptiste. I would like to know that this meeting is being live streamed and recorded. City Council and Committee meetings can be viewed on the City of New Bedford's homepage under quick links and then meetings. I will ask the clerk if there are any letters to be read into the record at this time. No records, no letters to be read into the records. Seeing no letters to be read into the record without a yes, counselor. Without objection, can we take item three out of order? Without objection, I will ask the clerk to read item number three. Item number three without objection is a written motion, Councilor President Burgo and Council's Gomes, Morad and Pereira requesting that the committee on ordinance meet to discuss removing the city council as the granting authority for special permits as they pertain to automotive sales and/or rentals, body repair, general repair, and light service by amending chapter 9, appendix A, Section H commercial motor vehicle uses. It was referred here on February 13th, 2025, and is now before you. Seeing none, all those in favor say aye. Aye. Opposed? The ayes have it. So colleagues, um, the chair would at this time uh like to invite up the clerk of the city, Dennis Farias to the podium, give a brief overview about uh uh the thoughts behind um this item here as it's uh a good starting point for us to engage in debate and conversation on this. Uh Clerk Farrias, thank you. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Uh good evening, counselors. So this this kind of started I don't know when it started exactly, but if several months ago um when Sue and I and Stephanie and I talk about things in the office, different procedures and things, we often talk about and discuss, you know, what can we make better? How can we streamline things? How can we make things better for the council, for the office, for the public? And one thing that kind of just kind of kept coming up was special permits. And so we started looking at the process and we realized that it's it's quite cumbersome. It's quite cumbersome for really uh it's very cumbersome for uh applicants, it's cumbersome for the council, for your schedule, for the office. So we started looking at it and we said, well, gee, you know, then we started talking to the licensing office, and there seems to be a lot of duplication. Um course, you know, you folks might feel differently, but so we kind of just said, you know, let's let's talk to a few counselors about it and see what they think. And we talked to a few of you, and you submitted this really, I think, for discussion purposes. So I think it's good to talk about it. Um, you know, I'm not here to advocate one way or the other, whether we revoke this thing completely or modify it somewhat, but I think it's worth looking at um to see how we can improve this. Um I'm a big believer in always trying to make things a little bit better. And uh and Sue Sue is uh on on that same page as well. So I'm here with any questions you have from me, if you'd like to go over anything specific, we can certainly discuss it. Do you mind just quickly um the current process? Just a quick um uh four hour before we begin conversation. Um Dennis, if you could just kind of go over uh the cost for the special permit and uh on average and the timeline, please. Sure. So on our end, so just to kind of backtrack a little bit, and I know Commissioner Manowitz is here, so we can he has his hit their procedures in his office as well. So from my understanding is when when the building commissioner the denies the permit initially, that's when the special permit process kicks in. So they have to come to our office, they they have the application. That application begins with anywhere from a seven hundred dollar to nine hundred dollar fee right off the bat, just to apply whether they get granted or not, okay. So they apply for that, as you know, it comes to the council, it gets referred to appointments and briefings, which is a very busy committee. Then it gets a vote in appointments and briefings, as you know it comes back to the council, then it goes to the mayor's office, where he has 10 days to sign it. Then it comes back down to the city council office, then it comes down to the city clerk's office where we hold it for a 20-day appeals period. So now, and then after that, now it goes back to the city council office for for final approval.
openpublica.com