Audit Committee Meeting Summary - December 9, 2025
Audit Committee Meeting Summary - December 9, 2025
A meeting of the Committee on Audit was held on Tuesday, December 9, 2025, with Chair Councillor Ryan Pereira presiding. Committee members present were Councillors Sean Oliver and Linda Morad. The meeting focused on routine reporting, the receipt of the Fiscal Year 2025 financial closeout report, and a detailed inquiry into historical legal expenditures related to the Parallel Products facility. The committee received testimony from Purchasing Director Molly Gilfeather Rodriguez and City Auditor Quillin Lowney, as well as Chief Financial Officer Bob Extrum.
Consent Calendar
- Receiving and Placing on File: A motion by Councillors Morad and Pereira to request monthly reports on Requests for Proposals (RFPs) was passed 3-0 and referred to the full City Council after Purchasing Director Molly Gilfeather Rodriguez demonstrated the transparency of existing online bidding platforms (BidNet Direct and BidDocs).
- Receiving and Placing on File: A motion to receive Councillor Oliver's email regarding the monthly RFP reporting process was unanimously passed.
- Receiving and Placing on File: The Fiscal Year 2025 Expenditures Report, presented by City Auditor Quillin Lowney and CFO Bob Extrum, was unanimously placed on file and recommended for distribution to the full City Council.
Public Comments & Testimony
- Councillor Lopes: Expressed concern regarding the practice of departments spending budgeted funds to exactly zero dollars (specifically citing the snow removal budget of $450,000), fearing it indicates unnecessary purchasing of supplies or capital equipment rather than genuine need. He also inquired about the lack of explanations for large surpluses in other departments.
- Councillor Morad: Questioned the transparency of the "Awarded Contracts" section on the city website, specifically the lack of hyperlinks to detailed bid documents, and sought clarification on how "To Be Determined" (TBD) statuses correlate with bid results.
Discussion Items
-
Purchasing Department Transparency (Molly Gilfeather Rodriguez):
- Position/Explanation: The Director explained that all solicitations are publicly posted on the City website, BidNet Direct, and BidDocs. She confirmed the department is fully digitized, with no paper applications accepted, though accommodations are made for small vendors lacking online presence.
- Clarification: She confirmed that full bid documents (which are public information) are shared upon FOIA request via OneDrive due to file size constraints and are not displayed directly on the website until contract award to prevent interference with the review process.
- Costs: The Director noted an annual subscription of approximately $3,000 for BidNet Direct and project-based fees of approximately $1,200 for BidDocs, which are paid for by the requesting departments.
-
Fiscal Year 2025 Financial Report (Quillin Lowney & Bob Extrum):
- General Fund Status: CFO Bob Extrum reported $13.4 million in excess revenues over expenditures for FY25, with a zero deficit across all 145 general fund budget line items and 173 total line items.
- Snow Removal Budget: Lowney and Extrum confirmed the snow removal department spent slightly over the $450,000 budget (likely ~$451-452k) due to overtime and supply purchasing, with the surplus used to fund the extra overtime costs. They confirmed no funds were diverted to capital equipment.
- Revenue/Surplus Anomalies: A $1.3 million surplus in "Cherry Sheet" assessments was attributed to state per-pupil calculations resulting in lower payments than initially budgeted (education sector). Extrum explained that school departments utilize "circuit breaker" accounts to sweep variances and match their final expenditures exactly to their budgeted amount, resulting in a zero favorable/unfavorable variance.
- Labor Forecast Concerns: Extrum identified the Police department as a primary concern for FY26, forecasting a potential $1 million deficit due to overtime and vacancy management, contrasting with Fire's successful overtime management. Additionally, he expressed concern that the budgeted snow removal cut from $450,000 to $300,000 removes the flexibility to handle a heavy snow year without a tax rate increase.
- Debt Service: Extrum clarified a $600,000 surplus in the Treasurer's debt service account resulted from favorable highway allocations and administrative savings. He noted that refinancing existing bonds is currently constrained by prepayment penalties for the first ten years of the bond issuance.
-
Parallel Products Legal Expenses (Items 3 & 4):
- Inquiry: The Committee reviewed legal invoices from firms KP Law and Beverage & Diamond totaling approximately $132,000 of a $250,000 appropriation from 2019.
- Discrepancy Identified: Councillor Lopes noted that some invoices within the packet referenced work related to "entering into an agreement" with Parallel Products, which contradicts the original 2019 appropriation purpose (which was to fund opposition/legal expenses to fight the project). He requested a specific report separating expenditures for "fighting" the project versus those incurred to "enter into an agreement".
- Missing Documentation: The Committee noted the absence of a memo from October 20, 2022, which had previously detailed these expenditures. CFO Extrum and Councillor Morad worked to locate this document during the meeting.
Key Outcomes
- Voting Results: All motions presented during the meeting passed unanimously (3-0).
- Directives to Staff:
- Purchasing Director to provide a detailed breakdown of the $250,000 Parallel Products appropriation and a specific categorization of invoices to distinguish between expenditures for "opposition" versus "agreement".
- CFO Extrum to provide a comprehensive report on the expenditures from the 2019 Parallel Products appropriation.
- Referrals:
- The monthly RFP request and the FY25 Expenditures Report are referred to the full City Council.
- Items 3 and 4 (Parallel Products) are tabled pending the delivery of requested data and a follow-up meeting with Chief of Staff Neil Mallow.
- Procedural Actions: The Committee waived the reading of Items 3, 4, and 5 and took no further action on Item 5 other than referring it to the full Council.
- Adjournment: The meeting adjourned at 8:31 PM.
Meeting Transcript
Is it cold in here or is it like a little bit of a little bit of a little bit? Yeah. Good evening. It is 7 41 on Tuesday, December 9th, in the City Council Chambers. I am joined tonight by my this is the Committee on Audit, excuse me. I am joined tonight by my colleagues, Council of Word 3, Sean Oliver, Counselor at Large and Second Vice President Linda Morad and myself, Councillor Ryan Pereira, Chair of the Committee on Audit. I'd like to thank our guests who have waited through a couple of meetings. There are none. None. Okay. Item number one, please. Item number one is a written motion, Councils Morrad and Pereira requesting that the purchasing director, Molly Gilfeather Rodriguez, please provide to the audit committee monthly by the fifth of each month report detailing the previous month's request for proposals issued by the City of New Bedford and was referred here on August 13th, 2024. And number one is before you. Second. Second by the only other person available, Councillor Morad. All those in favor, say aye. Roll call file. Roll call. And I want you to call the members of the committee, please. Do you call all the members of the committee, please? Quick. Roll calling on Receiving and Placing on file. Yeah, I do. Yeah. Councilor Abru. Councillor Abru. Councilor Lopes. Councillor Lopes. Council Morad. Yes. Yes, Councilor Moran. Councilor Oliver. Here. Yes, Council. Councillor Pereira. Yes. Yes. That passes three to zero. Passes three to zero receiving and placing on file. We are joined by the director of purchasing, Molly Gilfeather Rodriguez. Thank you, Molly, for being here with us this evening. Hi, good evening, Counselors. Yes, actually. Thank you. Before you begin, Molly, just procedural. Molly sent an email to the body regarding this with some background information if we could receive and place that on file. So moved. Made by Councillor Oliver, seconded by Councillor Morat. All those in favor of receiving and placing on file? Opposed?
openpublica.com