North Kingstown Town Council Public Hearing on FY2022-2023 Budget – April 13, 2022
STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE
North Kingstown Town Council Public Hearing on FY2022-2023 Budget – April 13, 2022
The North Kingstown Town Council held a public hearing on the preliminary budget for fiscal year 2022-2023. The hearing was divided into two parts: the town municipal budget (starting at 6:30 PM) and the school budget (starting at 7:00 PM). Town Manager Ralph Mollis presented the municipal budget, and School Committee Chairman Gregory Blasbalg and Interim Superintendent Michael Waterman presented the school budget. The council heard public testimony on both portions. No votes were taken; the council will deliberate and vote on the final budget at the next meeting on April 25, 2022.
Public Comments & Testimony
Town Budget Portion
- Richard Welch (8 R. O. Lane) asked about the homestead exemption (5% of valuation), questioned the slow sale of surplus town properties, urged the use of federal infrastructure money for Post Road sewers, and inquired about the town's solar projects. He expressed support for expediting these initiatives.
- Ricky Thompson (194 Plain Road) thanked the town manager and posed five questions: why the Ocean State Job Lot PILOT decreased, why a 10% increase in water meter sales, what the total water department surplus is, why a 17% increase in sewer allocation costs, and whether the 2022 budget surplus could be returned to taxpayers via a tax rate reduction. Town Manager Mollis answered three of the five and promised to follow up on the water questions. Thompson expressed concern about surplus exceeding the 15% fund cap and advocated for returning surplus to taxpayers.
School Budget Portion
- Richard August (Apple Tree Court) urged the school committee to consider the burden on taxpayers, noting that the total real estate taxes from 19 houses ($96,099) do not cover the salary and benefits of a single top-step teacher. He called for restraint in contract negotiations.
- John Kingston (116 High Bank Avenue) called for a forensic audit of the school system, citing the fallout from the Aaron Thomas investigation, recent resignations, and concerns about school committee spending on DEI programs, equity audits, and materials he deemed inappropriate.
- Richard Welch (second appearance) supported the call for a forensic audit, questioned the cost of the Phase 2 legal report (after $15,400 for Phase 1), and urged the council to apply the school department's surplus to reduce their budget request rather than adding it to reserves.
- Brian O'Dell (152 Salisbury Avenue) criticized the school department for having a $5.87 million operating surplus and $6.2 million in ESSER funds while teachers begged for supplies. He noted the town finance director was locked out of the school's software, questioned the $450,000 mental health contract for only 30 students, and opposed the $73,000 equity audit. He asked the council to scrutinize the school budget.
- Tiffany McLeod (170 Brookhaven Road) expressed frustration with the school committee, citing requests for basic supplies, potholes in the pickup lane, and the hiring of a police detail for an LGBTQ book fair despite a committee member advocating to defund the police. She criticized the $50,000 raise for Mary King, who she said joked about not knowing safety policies amid a sexual abuse scandal.
- Megan Riley (15 Eden Court) described her own experience of being escorted out of a policy subcommittee meeting after asking to meet with employees who had disparaged her. She alleged a pattern of retaliation by the school district, referencing the Aaron Thomas whistleblowers and a judge's finding of retaliation against a parent for advocating for a special needs child.
- Kathleen Garino (139 Summit View Lane) fully supported the school budget and expressed confidence in the legal process addressing the Aaron Thomas case. She called for an end to divisiveness and hatred, and thanked the school staff.
- Suzanne Tingley (750 Hatchery Road) urged rejection of the proposed school budget, noting it was not supported by the former superintendent or the school committee chairman. She raised concerns about last-minute additions, future structural deficits, expiring ESSER funds, and the push for curricula she described as politicized and sexualized, including specific books and an equity audit.
- Kim Lanaway (47 Sylvan Court) said she and many residents are financially strained by inflation and high taxes. She argued the school department should use its surplus to avoid any tax increase, and that the focus should be on core academic recovery rather than extras.
- Jim McGuinn (412 Chimney Rock) described difficulty obtaining school budget data from the school department, receiving a 500-page ream of paper instead of an Excel file, and later a password-protected file. He criticized the $600/day stipend for Mary King and questioned why the town finance director is locked out of the school's general ledger, calling the wall of secrecy a breeding ground for abuse.
- Ricky Thompson (second round) urged the town and school to adopt lean initiatives to achieve savings, noting that prior suggestions for joint efforts had not been pursued.
Discussion Items
- Town Manager's Presentation: Ralph Mollis summarized the proposed FY2022-2023 budget of $113,787,282, a 2.36% increase. Breakdown: 60.7% schools, 18.5% police/fire/dispatch, 14.8% other services, 4.6% debt service, 1.4% library. Highlights included $750,000 for road repaving, a teen summer camp, HR division, EV charging stations, website refresh, and full funding of the fire department's four-platoon system. He proposed a 5% homestead exemption, projecting a tax rate of $14.12 per thousand, a 19% decrease. He noted the fund balance reached $18 million, with an unrestricted balance of $12.8 million, and the town received a AA+ rating from S&P Global.
- School Committee Presentation: Chairman Gregory Blasbalg and Interim Superintendent Michael Waterman presented a budget request reflecting a 3.86% increase in town allocation. They cited learning loss, mental health needs, inflation, and aging buildings. The school department noted a $492,173 difference between their request and the town manager's proposed allocation of $68,542,225 plus $500,000 for capital.
Key Outcomes
- No votes were taken. The public hearing was closed.
- The next meeting is scheduled for Monday, April 25, 2022, where the town council will deliberate and vote on the final budget.
- The council will consider public testimony and the school committee's budget request before adopting the final budget.
Meeting Transcript
Let's call this meeting to order. Pursuant to Rhode Island General Laws 42-466C. Notice of this meeting is been posted on the Secretary of State's website. I'd ask everybody to stand and join me to salute for the flag. Thank you. Well, uh sorry for the late delay. It's only five minutes late, but nevertheless, we try to start on time. I do apologize for that. Anyways, tonight we are here really to hear from the public. It was as presented by the town manager. Tonight, though, is the opportunity for citizens to uh you know say what they think, and we certainly welcome their input. Um I do have the public sign-up sheet. I've only had three people sign up. And as those people go, I will ask uh if anyone else wants to sign up, uh please let me know. Uh the first personal per portion of our um uh budget public hearing tonight is going to be really about the um uh town municipal budget. And that is gonna run from 6:30 till done. And at 7 o'clock, we will uh have a public hearing on the school budget. Uh and so um we ask you to keep your comments out of respect for others to three minutes. We certainly accept a written confirmation, a written uh uh testimony. If you do go over the three minutes, you know, we'll certainly be somewhat flexible with you, but we ask you to bear in mind to be uh respectful of others. With that, uh the first person who has signed up to I'm sorry? Oh, is a I'm sorry not did you want to say something in the bottom to ask you? We can go in any order you'd like to normally I would present the budget and they can speak on it, but it's your call. No, no, no, I I admitted. No, no, it's why don't you present the budget? Sure, okay. No, not at all. We can do it either way, but that works. So uh so thank you. And welcome to the public hearing on the proposed budget for fiscal year 2023. Um anybody who hasn't received a handout, they're in the back on the table, so please feel free to grab one if you need one. Uh this tonight continues the process where I submitted my proposed budget to the town council on March 14th, followed by the town council publicly reviewing each individual budget with department heads and myself on March 18th and March 21st. The next meeting after tonight will take place on Monday, April 25th, where it is anticipated that the town council will vote on the final budget. Um while I introduced the budget on March 14th. Tonight I will summarize the budget for the benefit of the general public, and then the council will then open it up to any questions. And the slides that you see on the TV match the handouts, so again, please feel free to follow along on the handout or whatever is easier for you. Um I want to recognize and thank the department heads who are here tonight in attendance. Um again, they've been at both public hearings, and I want to thank them for their work. As I mentioned on March 14th, the departmental budgets have been compiled with an assessment of what is necessary to provide the outstanding level of services that our residents have come to expect while ensuring that the services are provided in a cost-effective manner. The result is a budget with a moderate increase of 2.36 percent. And this is at a time when costs and inflation have increased at record levels. So keeping it at 2.36 percent is something that I'm proud of, and I want to thank the department heads for their hard work in doing that. Uh the budget in detail can be found online on our website. It's been put together in a detailed, informative and transparent format, and as a result for the second consecutive year, we've received the Distinguished Uh Budget Presentation Award. The 113,787,282 proposed fiscal year 2023 budget can be broken down as follows. 60.7% of the budget is funding for our school department. 18.5% of the budget is funding for our police, our fire, and our dispatch. 14.8% of the budget is for all other governmental services, including our public works department. 4.6% of the budget is debt service, and 1.4% of the budget is our is for our library services. On the second page of the handout, or what is probably slide 4 on your handout, you will see a summarized breakdown of the entire fiscal year 2023 budget.
openpublica.com