Oakland City/County/Port Public Safety & Oversight Meetings – October 28, 2025
Humorseobia la media con la conición, la visiones, la conocía, la convención, la conocía de la visita de la Well, we're not going to be able to do that.
I am Reverend Dr.
Jacqueline Thompson.
I'm the senior pastor of Allen Temple Baptist Church, and it is my honor, my privilege, but moreover, my moral responsibility to stand before you this morning.
We gather here this morning, not out of fear, but in faith, faith in one another, faith in our community, and faith in the values that make Oakland the resilient, compassionate, I will add justice loving city that many of us have come to know and love.
And so in these times of uncertainty, we don't turn away from our neighbors.
This is who we are, and this is who we have always been.
And it must be made clear that this is who we will continue to be.
Today you will hear from leaders all across every sector of our community, from city hall to our classrooms, from labor unions to our legal advocates, from business to community, and of course, from the faith community as well.
All of those who stand on the front lines doing work on behalf of protecting our residents.
Each voice you will hear today represents thousands more standing in solidarity.
So we are unwavering in our commitment to send a clear message.
And now, of course, it is my pleasure to introduce a leader who needs no introduction, but we are blessed because she has dedicated her life to fighting for justice and equality and dignity for every person.
Please help me welcome the honorable mayor of Oakland, Barbara Lee.
Thank you so much, Pastor Jackie, my pastor, and I want to thank first our Allen Temple Baptist Church family for once again bringing us together and helping us navigate this very serious moment here in our community.
And I want to thank everyone here, our local, county, state partners, community leaders, our neighbors, everyone who continued to stand up for Oakland's immigrant rights.
And I think Pastor Jackie framed this message exactly what we're here about today.
And I want to thank the press for being here also and for listening and covering the fact that we're united front, first of all, elected officials, faith leaders, community partners, all of us delivering action over anxiety, and protection over fear, as our democracy faces new tests.
Now, recent uh news reports, and I think you all have seen that uh in San Francisco, Mayor Lurie received a call from Donald Trump indicating that uh San Francisco is no longer on his list.
That does not mean we are not prepared, we have no idea.
This is very fluid, and so there's no information we can bring to you today to bring you up to date on what plans they have in place, but we are moving forward with our plans and we are prepared.
Uh, the federal administration, of course, has escalated its rhetoric and its enforcement posture in the Bay Area.
We know that border patrol agents are being stationed on Coast Guard Island.
But let me be clear.
Our city, as I said, we are fully prepared.
We're monitoring developments closely and will keep our residents informed if there are any confirmed changes.
Oakland is and will continue to be a welcoming city for our immigrants and our refugees, and our laws and values reflect that.
The Oakland Police Department does not and will not assist with immigration and customs enforcement.
That policy stands firm, and our assistant chief will outline exactly how we are upholding it under tremendous pressure.
Oakland police officers, of course, will protect Oaklanders' First Amendment's rights.
However, we are a city which has always been a peaceful city, and we want to make sure that we don't take the bait and that violent behavior toward anyone, police officers, people, individuals-that's not tolerated in Oakland.
We stand with our immigrant community and with our neighbors no matter your status, and we are coordinating with our local and regional partners to provide support and legal resources.
These federal actions are not about public safety as they try to uh pretend that's what they're doing.
Uh, their political stunts designed to divide and to intimidate.
Oakland will not take the bait.
We will remain calm, focused, and united.
And we all know that crime is down.
Oakland is rebuilding, rising, and on the move.
We will not allow outsiders to create chaos or exploit our city.
Peaceful protest is the cornerstone of who we are.
We will support and protect residents' right, First Amendment rights to speak, to march, and to organize peacefully and safely.
We ask everyone to stay calm, stay informed, and stand together.
Do not let ICE or anyone else provoke disorder in our community.
We know that this moment is painful and triggering for many families.
The trauma is real, but we are responding not with fear, but with collaboration, courage, and care.
So together with our partners, of course, uh last month we launched the Stand Together Bay Area Fund to support families impacted by aggressive immigration enforcement.
In Oakland, we will show strength through our compassion through our justice framework and lens and through equity.
So the progress, of course, in Oakland is ongoing and it belongs to us, our city, not to outside forces.
We will protect it and we will protect one another.
We will not let anyone bring or wreak havoc or turmoil in our city.
Whose motto, and I hope you remember this during this period.
Our motto is love life.
So thank you again, Pastor Jackie.
Thank you, mayor, as always, for your steadfast leadership and for your unwavering commitment to the values we have as a sanctuary city.
And so we know that protection under the law and justice are cornerstones of this community.
And so I want you to welcome at this time our district attorney who's going to come and share how that office stands with Oakland residents.
Help me welcome Alameda County District Attorney Ursula Jones Dixon.
So good morning.
You know, I had I was blessed last night to have a conversation with Mira Lee.
And I had to remind myself and her that we know the playbook.
There's nothing new under the sun.
We know that they're baiting Oakland.
And that's why San Francisco all of a sudden is off the table.
So I'm not going to be quiet about what we know is coming.
We know that their expectation is that Oakland is going to do something to cause them to make us the example.
That's not what we're doing.
So the reason I wanted to come here today is that I can tell you what the DA's office can and cannot do.
The one thing I cannot do, and law enforcement really cannot do is stand in the way of a legal warrant.
And nobody I don't think expects us to.
But we we can't violate the law in that way, but we don't assist ICE.
The DA's office does not do that.
In a public space, we can't stop people from coming in, but they cannot come into the DA space.
I think we are oftentimes considering the fact that there are people who are allegedly charged with a crime who they are looking for, ICE, federal agents.
Our victims, our witnesses fall under that category as well.
And we're being hit pretty hard because people don't feel safe coming into court to testify.
It's our job to make them know that we protect their rights no matter what their immigration status is.
I don't need to know what your immigration status is.
What I need to know is that, what I need them to know, I should say, is that we have their back.
So I'm explaining to you all that my hope for all of us is that we don't take the bait on this one.
I'm hoping that there is not the pitting of county and state law enforcement against federal law enforcement.
That's how I see this picture.
But we can't have it.
So we know that peaceful protest is what that's the foundation we stand on.
That's why I stand here now.
I'm the queen of a protest at the University of California at Berkeley, so don't check my record.
So my point is we want to support that, but we also want to encourage people to not engage federal law enforcement.
They want to make an example, and they specifically want it for this city, and that is clear based upon what I heard from San Francisco this morning.
The other thing that I wanted to make sure that you know is that as we meet we move forward in supporting victims of crime as well as people who are charged with crimes, we need to be really honest with ourselves about the fact that these are complicated times.
Things are moving very quickly.
So if you get something from us, and then two hours later you get something different.
Don't think we're moving funny.
We just want you to know information as it comes up because everything's new right now.
Everything's new.
I want to leave this meeting to go to another meeting so that I can speak radio, whatever.
We need as much press as possible so that people know that we stand united in the city of Oakland and the county of Alameda.
So I'm not stepping out on you.
I'm going right over to KQED to do this all over again.
But I want you to know that the DA's office stands with everybody.
We protect everybody's rights and we seek justice on behalf of everyone, no matter their immigration status, that won't change.
So I'm asking you all, please today do whatever you can peacefully, calmly, proactively to make sure that you stand in the gap for people who can't stand for themselves today.
I just want to thank all of the electeds and everybody, labor, everybody who's here.
This is the way we should be doing this every day, standing together.
So thank you, Mayor.
Thank you all.
We thank District Attorney Dixon for her commitment to justice and protecting all of our residents.
And so we know all too well in Oakland that in moments like these, it is critical that we underlie the trust that is needed between the community and the Oakland Police Department.
And so we are glad that the Oakland Police Department is here to share with us their plans and how they intend to help keep community residents safe.
And so Assistant Chief Beer is coming at this time to share with us their commitment to serving all who are protected under the law.
Thank you.
Good morning.
I'm assistant chief James Beer.
First of all, I want to make it totally clear that the Oakland Police Department does not participate, assist, or enforce civil immigration matters.
Our officers will not ask for anyone's immigration status.
We will not share personal information about our residents with federal authorities related to immigration.
The Oakland Police Department has no authority to oppose or prevent federal authorities to conduct immigration investigations within our city of Oakland.
However, the Oakland Police Department, our police officers, are always clearly identifiable by our official police uniform.
And or we will provide our law enforcement credentials.
I want to make it clear if anyone attempts to enter your house or detain you and they are not in uniform or they do not show official credentials.
Please call 1911 immediately.
Again, I'd like to thank the mayor and her team, everybody here behind us, and we'll stay united to make sure we keep our community safe.
Thank you.
Thank you, Assistant Chief Beer.
We know that we can also help the Oakland Police Department by making sure we are keeping one another safe.
One of the ways that we can do that is to make sure you are sharing this information with those in your community, with your families, and with those that you love.
So we can make sure this message gets out to all those who need to hear it.
One of the questions that I've been asked and the concerns that have been raised has been around our children and how they will react in this moment.
And so we are grateful to have with us Superintendent Denise Sadler, who is going to come at this time and share with us how they intend to help our children continue to feel safe, our teachers feel safe in the environments where they learn, and moreover, to give parents and family the comfort that they need.
So help me welcome at this time Superintendent Denise Sadler.
I'd like to have my board members join me, stand with me.
Today I want to reaffirm what Oakland has long stood for: our unwavering commitment to be a sanctuary district and a sanctuary city.
We stand proudly with our students, our families, and neighbors, no matter where they come from or what language they speak.
Let's be clear.
We do not need outside troops or agents coming into our city to intimidate, bully, or separate our families.
Oakland has never been a place where fear rules.
We do not tolerate the kidnapping of children or the tearing apart of communities.
In Oakland, we take care of our own.
We educate, we nurture, and we protect.
Our schools are places of safety, belonging, and hope, not fear.
Every child who walks through our doors deserves to learn, to dream, and to thrive without the shadow of harassment or discrimination.
To our families, I want them to know you are seen, you are valued, and you are part of this community.
To our staff, I want to thank them for standing firm in our mission to serve the whole child.
And to everyone who believes in justice and humanity, we must, as our Mayor Barbara Lee has stated so perfectly, we must move forward together.
Oakland will always be a sanctuary.
We all understand what our children need.
We all understand and value our children, our families, and our shared future.
Thank you, and I want to ask my board member to speak with them.
Thank you.
I think what you see behind us is really the power of the city and the power of effective leadership.
Mayor Barbara Lee has brought together NGOs, child care workers, our physicians, our faith leaders, our local and county and regional and state elected to come together in one voice to say that we support the residents of Oakland, one voice.
And so I want to be clear just quickly about a couple of things.
This infrastructure that you see behind you, from fire to our sworn officers, to our community health outreach workers, to our mental health specialists.
They are working day in and day out to create a safer Oakland.
And from a federal perspective, I believe wholeheartedly that Oakland is far beyond what folks understand and know about our city.
This is a beautiful city full of opportunity and full of strategic thinkers.
In this moment of fear and speaking to folks in our community, I want you to know what my job is.
My job one is to go to work.
Unfortunately, unfortunately, as we speak right now in the dome, in the Capitol, the doors of the House floor are closed.
For over four weeks, the Speaker of the House, Mike Johnson, has closed all business of the United States Congress.
So a majority of that four weeks, I, along with Democratic colleagues, have been inside of that dome, ready and willing to negotiate to open this government back up, but they refuse to come to the table.
So I get to be here in my town, Oakland, California.
While in the middle of a government shutdown, I want to be clear that what is being threatened by the administration is not about public safety.
Not for one minute.
If it were, the president of the United States would have been in long-term conversations with the leaders of our great cities in the East Bay.
Members of the Oakland community, I want you to know that our job collectively here today is to do a few things.
We will work to protect every single member of this community, every single law-abiding member of this community.
We will protect children, we will protect our elders, we will protect our officers, we will protect our protesters who come into a city to lift the voices of humanity.
We're clear about that.
We will also make sure that information that you deserve and that you need is consistent and ongoing.
Be on the lookout for what's coming out of the mayor's office, my office, and other members of our elected family, your faith communities, your pastors, your imams, your temples.
They will all have information about your rights.
So I want to make sure you know that we are collected, we are collaborating, and we want to let you know that we're here to support you.
And I want you to know that I am, I am outraged at an administration that would rather terrorize communities than fix a broken immigration system.
We will moreover together and collectively stand by our beliefs that terror and that violence inflicted by the Trump administration upon this community are unwanted, unwarranted, and illegal.
We come in peace, and even as we protest today, there will be members of our community who will lift their voices.
They know as we know.
We don't need violence.
We need the mirror of the truth.
And the truth is that we keep us safe.
We in Oakland keep us safe.
Thank you so much.
Thank you, Congresswoman Latifa Simon, and for your commitment to be consistent and making sure we get accurate information for protecting us in all of our iterations and moreover for committing to use your voice on behalf of justice.
And so coming from the state, from our state capital, representing us with courage and conviction always.
We are grateful to have with us Senator Jesse Arragan, who's gonna come at this time and share with us.
Well, thank you, Pastor Thompson.
I'm State Senator Jesse Edigan.
I'm proud to represent Oakland and a resident of Oakland.
I'm joining my colleague State Senator Aisha Wahab, who represents Southern Alameda County.
We're here united to say that the East Bay and the State Senate stands united with the East Bay community at this difficult time.
That we stand for the right for peaceful protests and we stand to say that ICE and federal troops have no presence in our communities.
The state of California has been preparing for this moment for the past several months.
You know, one of the first actions we took this year was to allocate uh millions of dollars of funding for legal defense and to allow our attorney general to be able to take legal action against the Trump administration.
To date, over 40 lawsuits have been filed by the state of California against the Trump administration, and the state is ready to submit another lawsuit if Trump attempts to deploy the military here against our own citizens.
We've also passed a series of laws saying that secret police, mass agents have no presence in our communities, that law enforcement needs to do their operations with full transparency and accountability.
We've passed laws to protect our schools and protect our health care spaces, and we're here to say that the state of California stands with you.
We saw what happened in Los Angeles and what Trump is trying to do in other cities.
Now he wants to do that here in our own home here in the East Bay.
We will not allow it.
We call on the community to not fall into Trump's trap.
He relishes at the opportunity to be a wannabe dictator, and he wants to sow chaos as an excuse to send in the military to Oakland Streets.
To your residents, we stand by your right to peacefully protest, and we call on you to peacefully protest.
Our nation was born from the ideals of standing up to authoritarianism, and it's our obligation to continue that legacy today.
Thank you.
I'm State Senator Aisha Wahhab.
I wanted to specifically state again, thank you, thank you to Mayor Lee, as well as every single freedom fighter here in the Bay Area.
This is what it is freedom fighting.
And I want to highlight the topics that weren't talked about.
We've we mentioned the federal shutdown.
The fact that IOUs don't pay grocery bills, the fact that people are struggling already, the fact that we know that the administration wants to hide and shy away from the Epstein files.
We also, I personally would like to call upon all of the Republicans, all of the independent voters and the fiscally conservative.
Where's your voice in this time?
We know that this is morally bankrupt, and we also know this is not just gonna hurt the economy of the Bay Area, it's gonna hurt the United States of America on an international playing field.
And when we talk about making sure that America is the leader in the nation, I mean in the world, what are we doing today?
What are you doing?
You guys have been silent.
Speak up.
You know this is wrong.
Thank you.
Thank you to our state senators for being here and for their impassioned plea, but moreover sharing with us the work that has been done for the lawsuits that have been filed, for the dollars that have been allocated.
I personally, as a resident am appreciative.
And if trouble is what I do.
So let me just take just a brief moment of liberty and remind us we have a ballot that is in our mailbox, proposition 50.
As we're talking about legislation, we are here because this moment proves to us that elections matter, that your voice matters, that your vote matters.
So for those of you who have not engaged, I drop that.
Do not send anything to the mayor, send it directly to me.
We are online, the Allen Temple Baptist Church in Deep East Oakland.
Representing Assembly District 18 with an unwavering dedication and commitment, please welcome California State Assembly member, Mia Banta.
It's wonderful to be able to be with you all today.
Funny thing happened on my way to work today.
I live in the city of Vallamita, went the back way on the service road, past Coast Guard Island to our office here on 1515 Clay Street because I get to represent the beautiful people of Oakland, Alameda, and Emeryville.
And in this moment, I couldn't be more proud because what I saw were people singing.
What I saw were people marching.
What I saw were people fighting for our liberty and protection of every single community member on that service road.
We here in Oakland and in the East Bay and in AD 18 are in a moment of seeking peace, of seeking grace, and ensuring that every member of our community, every undocumented person, every refugee, every immigrant knows that we are standing with them today.
Whether you are a citizen or somebody who was seeking citizenship, seeking asylum here, you know that you have a place of grace here in this district.
That is what I see when I walk around this district.
So let us not be fooled.
Let us not be tempted by the chaos that this federal administration, this Trump administration is trying to have us fall into.
We will defend with righteousness, and we will defend ensuring that we are taking care of our own.
Making sure that the state of California is providing the resources and the legislation and the legal protection to ensure that our community members will be protected.
I'm honored to have been a part of that work, but I need you all to know that as soon as word came down that something funny was happening on Coast Guard Island.
By the way, Coast Guards who are a part of that federal shutdown, whose children are going to food banks right now.
We started to operate and work with the city, our amazing county supervisors and others who you will hear from our frontliners, our community-based organizations, our health organizations, to make sure that we could protect and care for our own.
Today, it is okay for them to racially profile us, to go to our workplaces, to go to our schools, to go to our hospitals, and that's why we've worked so hard, as the senators have mentioned, as a state to prepare for this moment.
But the reality is our families don't feel prepared.
They feel the anxiety, they feel the fear, watching the news, knowing that those ICE agents can come up at any moment and take them away from their families.
We've seen this in Los Angeles.
We're seeing it in Chicago and in other parts of this country.
And what I want to say today to this to our community, particularly to our Latino community, which I will speak in Spanish in a minute, is that we're in this together.
We're united, and that same city that embraced me at three years old, that comforted me and did not put me in a cage is the same city and the same state and the same America that is going to stand up, fight back, and rise to see a beautiful tomorrow.
And so we are grateful that we are not doing this in isolation, but this is indeed a partnership on many levels, and present with us representing Alameda County is Supervisor Nikki Fortunato Bass.
Alameda County has been a partner in protecting our communities, and she is here this morning to share the resources and the services that are being made available on behalf of the county to make sure that all of the county residents are safe.
Let's welcome her.
Thank you, Pastor Jackie.
Again, I'm Nikki Fortunato Bass, Alameda County Supervisor for District 5, North County, probably representing Oakland and North County, joining me as Supervisor Alisa Marquez, who represents District 2 and chairs our public protection committee.
Not only am I your supervisor, we are both daughters of immigrants.
My parents came from the Philippines seeking economic opportunity, and my grandparents came fleeing a dictator in the Philippines, a dictator who was ousted by a people's power movement.
And part of my message today is that an organized community is a safe community, and what we have to do right now is organize, organize to keep each other safe.
Here in Alameda County, where a third of our residents are immigrants or refugees, we want you to know that we have your back.
So we want to make sure that number one, you know your rights, and that you have your own family safety plan.
Number two, that you verify sightings of ICE enforcement with our rapid response hotline, and number three, that we all defend our constitutional rights.
And so you heard from our uh you heard from our district attorney.
Our public defender's office, together with several legal organizations, is defending our constitutional right to due process as well as to a right to an attorney.
We also have our county uh our Alameda County Sheriff, Asenia Sanchez, who has reaffirmed that the sheriff's office will not cooperate with federal immigration enforcement.
And I want you to also know that our board, together with our county council, has joined numerous lawsuits to defend our rights and our resources under the constitution.
So our communities have overcome repression and violence in historic and current movements for civil rights, for workers, for immigrant rights, and we will continue to keep that tradition alive.
Lastly, as you heard from our congresswoman, we are in week four of this federal shutdown.
Our communities need a functioning federal government that will deliver on our safety net, not a militarized presence.
And at your county, we are working fiercely to defend our safety net in the midst of this dismantling through the federal budget and the shutdown.
Just last Tuesday I pushed for 10 million dollars for food security, and our board agreed to that amount.
We will make it official on Tuesday.
So know again that Alameda County has your back.
You are not alone.
We have a great coalition of organizations who will stand with you to ensure that we are all informed, prepared, and that we are organizing to defend our constitutional rights and our democracy.
Thank you.
So my faith tradition teaches that people perish for lack of knowledge.
And we know that part of this moment is to institute fear so that people forget what it is that we actually really know.
But we are grateful for Lotus Martinez who was coming to share with us about free legal services that are available, as well as rapid response services that are available.
So she's coming from the Alameda County immigration legal education partnership.
Let's welcome her.
Thank you very much.
My name is Lourdes Martinez.
I am co-director of the immigrant rights program at Centro de Legal de la Rasa, one of the organizations that thanks to the support of Alameda County elected officials and a group of funders, has been able to relaunch the Alameda County Immigration Legal and Education Partnership, a CLIP, which is a rapid response network in Alameda County.
First, as an immigrant woman, I just want to say humbly thank you to everybody.
I am so deeply in gratitude, and I feel privileged to live in the East Bay of California during this time of political crisis for immigrants and in particular for Latino immigrants, brown skinned immigrants who are feeling now completely unprotected by what we had hoped would be constitutional protections in the land of liberty.
Thank you to our elected officials, but also thank you to organizers, activists, organizations, the schools, everybody who is standing in solidarity with immigrants.
As we've been operating the hotline over the past few months, we have been witnessing how our neighborhoods become destabilized, our families separated, and we have seen the cruel, the cruelty of the federal government become a reality for our communities.
I want to say very clearly, we are a county where one in every three of us is foreign born.
And that means that almost all of us are at least in a mixed status family, or we are somehow connected to the story of immigration.
Especially now that the federal government has made it um okay to racially profile and to stop someone because of the way that they uh the language they speak, the skin color, or our appearances belonging to a certain sector of the economy, it's just really important that we understand our cultures and our heritage are not political and they are not woke.
They are reality, they are who we are.
They are our heritage, they are our families, our ancestors, they are our identities, and it is what makes us strong.
And we must continue to stay proud and united in who we are, individually and collectively.
These raids that this ICE activity has already been happening, but with the with the recent threats, we are anticipating an escalation, and it is what's happened in other cities such as Washington, DC, Chicago, Portland is that if there has been deployment of additional federal law enforcement, it has really strengthened ICE and their ability to execute more detentions.
So that is what we are bracing for.
And we just, you know, we want to ask that the community help us by calling.
If you see something, please avoid spreading any unverified reports, but call us and let us actually verify.
And if you want to join our team of verifiers, and it does take a village, we are having a training this evening and will continue to do so.
We already have a large group, and thank you to all the volunteers and all the activists on the ground who are helping us verify immigration enforcement activity in Alameda County.
We also not only want to verify and be in constant communication with you all, please confirm on social media.
We also want to be tracking immigration enforcement in Alameda County and make sure that nobody disappears.
And so we also have attorneys, constantly present and part of our regional effort to have a constant lawyer presence at 630 Sansome in San Francisco.
Please call us, preferably the day of, but it really doesn't matter when a detention happened.
Please report it.
And I don't want to go through the guidance here, but we have it on our social media on our website for the kinds of things that we want to ask that we all be preparing to look to be on the lookout for so that we can report ICE activity or detentions.
We know this is an uncertain and stressful time.
This is a mount, but however, this is a moment of unity and power, not panic.
If you or someone you know might be impacted, here are five ways to protect yourself and your loved ones right now.
Know your rights.
We still have rights, and it doesn't matter how that much they violate them, we must assert our rights.
You have the right to remain silent and to not open your door.
You have the right to speak to a lawyer.
Know your rapid response hotline number.
A CLIP is 5102414011, and we have listed online all of the other regional hotline numbers.
Be prepared to share as many details.
Like I said, if you can please, this is something important for our personal education.
This would be something good to follow up on your own to learn about all the details regarding location, time, uniform or other garb that law, you know, people executing detentions are wearing, etc.
Create a safety plan, identify who can care for children, pets, or other responsibilities if needed.
We certainly have guides on our website, and you know, we are also conducting trainings.
We have an event coming up next week.
We may be moving it to to provide more such events online because we understand people are afraid.
Memorize important phone numbers, and if you are an immigrant, memorize your A number.
Share key information with trusted loved ones.
Sometimes it will be your loved ones who will be calling us on the hotline, and it is very helpful if they know the information that we need and that we are asking them, or that the attorneys will need.
Gather important documents, such as paths, passports, IDs, medical records, keep them in a safe place and make copies.
Minimize your risk.
Follow updates from trusted community organizations.
Weigh your individual risk and just remember that we are living under difficult times where ICE is allowed to racially profile.
And I'll finish in English just to reiterate, we are part of a strong united community that protects one another, that is part of the privilege of being here today.
Together we will continue to defend our rights, our family, and our dignity.
Thank you for being here today.
Thank you for supporting the Rapid Response Network of Alameda County.
Stay informed, stay ready, and stay in community.
Thank you, Lordes, and we'll remind you once again that most of the information she has shared will be available to you once this is over.
Please know that it is not our intent to rush anyone, but we want to make sure that all of our speakers are here in every segment of our community gets their time to speak.
And so with that, we're always grateful for our partnership with Labor.
Labor has always stood for justice for the dignity of all workers, and we are grateful for Antoinette Blue, who is here, and she's going to come speak on behalf of working families across this city from SEIU 1021.
Well, good morning, everybody.
As she just said, my name is Antoine Blue.
I am the chapter president of SEIU Local 1021 City of Oakland chapter.
I am also a 911 dispatcher with LPD.
Our union members are the librarians, the head start teachers, the gardeners, your department of transportation workers, public works workers, crossing guards, and more.
They're the ones that keep this city running and helping the community members live in a lifestyle that they're able to live in and attain.
For the people who don't know in the back, Oakland is one of the most diverse cities in the country.
Our diversity is the source of our solidarity and our strength.
And we as city workers are committed to delivering services to all Oaklanders, regardless of your immigration status.
We are proud to sit to stand here with Mary Lee in defending our community against unwanted and dangerous federal overreach, of which we strongly oppose the deployment of federal agents that target our black and brown communities.
We oppose the Trump administration attacks on programs like Head Start, which care for thousands of Oakland children every single day.
Let me be very clear.
Okay.
So with that, I want to urge everybody to pick a lane.
I know everybody says about changing lanes and staying within their lane, pick a lane in this fight.
That could be text baking, talking to your community members, passing out resources, or being on the front line and actually showing up and showing out.
I want to bring the attention also to my hoodie because it is essentially the theme of what we're doing.
The city of Oakland is the power.
And we are here, and we're all united to fight.
And that's everybody that's behind me, my community members, my members of my union, in addition to the leadership for the state in the city.
So I just wanted to thank you guys for your time.
Make sure you guys get out there and vote.
As you can see, the time is now and games are not to be played.
Thank you.
There are so many one-liners, I don't know which one to pick up there.
Unite to fight, pick a lane, power in the storm.
Yeah.
We thank you.
And thank our labor community for always standing with us.
And so we also want to make sure that we are including members of our Asian Pacific Islander community.
They're a central part of our city's fabrics and coming to share resources that are available and support that's available.
Is Nancy Wong, senior staff attorney with Asian Pacific Islander legal outreach.
Good morning, everyone.
And thank you, Mayor Lee and her staff for inviting me to uh share some words with all of you.
And my family has been my um mixed immigrant family, which includes undocumented people and documented people for four generations here in the city of Oakland.
So we are very grateful to the city of Oakland and the surrounding East Bay and Bay Area for the way that this area has welcomed my family and others within our community.
And I just want to share with you that the Asian community stands united with our Latino and Haitian and other black immigrant brothers and sisters.
We do provide free legal services in removal defense, affirmative filings, we go out into the community and educate all of our neighbors and service providers on the uh rights of immigrants, and we also try to help uh organizations come up with a protocol on how to keep ice out of you know their establishments, whether they be small businesses or social programs, or other uh types of um employer-based uh places.
So I just want to call upon the people in the public general public, those who are both immigrants and non-immigrants, to use this opportunity to uh learn rights of everybody, our constitutional rights.
I know that they're being attacked.
I know that the Trump administration is uh severely trying to erode these rights.
But if we stand up to this and fight back, that's the only way that we're going to be able to retain those rights.
So we would really like people who want to help the non-immigrants who are U.S.
citizens to step up and learn how to go out and teach other people their rights, maybe provide practical help in going shopping or taking their children to the doctor, other things that you could do.
But please remember to protest peacefully.
The people that are adversely the most adversely impacted are the people very people that you want to protect and help, and those are the uh people within the immigrant community.
And okay, and then the final thing I just want to say is we have these red cards, and I brought them, I always carry them with me wherever I go when I see people in the street, or you know, I'm on BART, and maybe ICE shows up, I start passing them out.
So we have these red cards in all different languages, and hopefully we can get them disseminated out to everyone in Alameda County, so that they um when ICE approaches them, they can all they have to do is just show them the red card.
Um, thank you very much for your time and attention.
Thank you, Nancy, and we'll make sure that no one leaves here without a red card.
And so we're grateful for the presence of our city council persons that are here today.
We have two of them that are coming before us at this time, Charlene Wong and Zach Unger.
We're gonna ask them to come forward.
I am so proud to represent uh District 2 City of Oakland.
It includes the communities of Chinatown, Little Saigon, and San Antonio.
Um these are some of the most diverse communities that we have in here in Oakland.
Um I'm also the public safety chair, and I'm proud to stand with the mayor with her leadership in addressing this crisis.
What we know too is that what we're seeing here at the federal level, this is just uh quite frankly, white supremacy.
Let's just call it for what it is.
Um we see racial profiling, we're seeing immigrants of color who are being racially profiled in LA.
It was the it was the LA Chinatown that was being targeted that kicked this all off.
And so uh we are all, you can see the the rainbow of voices that we are standing here in solidarity.
Uh we have a lot of work to do, as uh our congresswoman said.
It's it's time for us to get to work, it's time for us to look at our city policies and see what we can do to protect our communities.
Um, and uh that's um the most important thing.
So thank you, everyone.
I'll keep it brief.
I'm struck that this is happening today, one day after we renamed a street for Bobby Seal.
Oakland has a proud tradition.
We don't back down, we stand up.
Enough said.
Enough said, and let me add, it was a wonderful celebration for the street renaming yesterday for Bobby Seal.
Long overdue.
So we're coming into the home stretch, but we did not want to end this moment without making sure that we heard from members of our business community.
And so we have two representatives that are here, and we're grateful for their presence.
We're going to hear from Barb Leslie from the Oakland Chamber of Commerce representing the business community, and then following her from the small business community, the heart of Oakland's neighborhoods of Tisicia Chavez.
Good morning.
I'm Barbara Leslie.
I'm the president and CEO of the Oakland Metropolitan Chamber of Commerce, and standing next to me are my colleagues, Kathy Adams, the president and CEO of the Oakland African American Chamber of Commerce, and Stephanie Trand, the president of the Oakland, Chinatown Chamber of Commerce.
We proudly stand today together in solidarity with our city leadership, our state and federal electeds, our community partners, and the hundreds of small and immigrant business owners across Oakland that we represent, who contribute each and every day to our local economy, our cultural identity, and are integral to Oakland's beautiful future.
We have a long history, as it's been said earlier.
We have a long history in Oakland of standing up and speaking out, and we will, against injustice, and we will continue to support the efforts of every individual to stand up and speak out peacefully against injustice across our city for our businesses, for our residents, and for everybody here in Oakland.
And we thank you very much for allowing us to be here today and partner with you in this effort.
Thank you.
Thank you for speaking up and speaking out.
Last but certainly not least, where would we be if it were not for the foundation of our faith community, regardless of our faith traditions?
And so coming to us now, because we know faith leaders have been the moral compass of this community, and with us to share a word of strength and solidarity.
We are grateful for Pastor Michael McBride.
I want to uh thank our courageous and righteous Mayor Barbara Lee, who always speaks for me and us.
Uh I stand as a representative of the faith community, and I see my colleagues here, obviously, Reverend Dr.
Jackie Thompson, Bishop Keith Clark, Bishop Keith Barnes, uh the homie uh Brother DeMaria, aka Truck, known in the neighborhood, uh, Brother Ron Mohammed, all of us together, uh, as well as with the credible messengers of our city, uh, the community violence interventionists who have contributed to the historic reductions we continue to see in our communities.
We stand and join the chorus of voices and say we are not in a state of an emergency in Oakland.
Donald Trump, you are the emergency.
We are not a city of lawlessness and chaos.
Donald Trump, you are an agent of chaos.
You are the wrecking ball that has been unleashed in our city, in this state and this country.
Unlike the East Wing of the White House, Oakland's walls will not fall that easily.
We are here to declare that God has not given us the spirit of fear, but of love, power, and a sound mind or self-discipline.
We are here in unshakable solidarity to declare to you and to remind all of our loved ones and community members in Oakland and the Bay Area that we stand up when repression rises.
We are a city with a superpower.
That superpower is the power of the people.
Whatever problems we have in our city, the people of Oakland will solve those problems.
You can join us in our efforts to solve those problems.
We know you will not, so we will resist your intrusion and your overreach.
You do not stop crime and illegal behavior by unleashing more crime and illegal behavior.
You do not use violence to create nonviolence.
Blessed are the peacemakers, for they will be called the children of God.
This administration's effort to bend and break the laws of this country to continue to elevate a manufactured crime and immigration narrative is immoral.
It is wrong.
And we as faith leaders and civic leaders will name it as such.
You are a liar.
Other cities where this federal overreach has happened, has also shown us that black community members whose immigration status and citizenship are not in question, are also being targeted, harassed, arrested, jailed, and brutalized.
With this in mind, many of us who we have already named are launching the Secure the Town initiative to ensure we engage with black youth and young adults in schools and neighborhoods, car and bike clubs, cultural spaces, congregations, and many other places where communities gather to make sure they have the information they need and to ensure we are all standing in solidarity with all of Oakland.
To those who seek support, to those who need relief and protection, reach out to us.
Your clergy member and leader is for you.
Do not surrender to fear to our young people.
We implore you, do not get caught up by engaging with federal officers who often likely are untrained, unprofessional, and unaccountable.
Be wise in your movements, carry your IDs, know your rights by attending the trainings online and in person.
Be where you are supposed to be, and do not be where you are not supposed to be.
Do not get caught up.
Border patrol is targeting and taking our people to.
Truth, justice, peace, and joy.
And we beg the Congress, please release the Epstein files.
In the words of our dear beloved ancestors and champions of Oakland, all power to the people.
And with that, we thank all of the community representatives for being here today and for taking time out of their schedule.
We certainly thank all of you and you who are joining us online.
And so we have heard our marching orders today.
We reinforce for the residents and for all of the people that Oakland is stronger together, that we are united, that we are prepared, and we will protect one another.
I just want to make sure that you heard those resources that were available to you.
So remember the hotline number is 510-241-4011.
You are also able to visit the city's website, Oaklandca.gov for city resources, and sign up for alerts on that same website.
I certainly want to close by thanking our amazing liberation justice freedom fighting mayor.
For not waiting, for not hesitating, but making sure that there was an answer so that there could be peace and calm in the city.
And my particular faith tradition teaches that if you are a person of faith, you ought to desire to do justice.
And to love mercy, and to walk humbly with our God.
We need to be united for the fight.
And if you do nothing else, pick a lane.
Thank you all for being here.
I'm the council member of Oakland's District 3, and right now we're in Old Oakland.
And I got invited to do one of the oldest strolls that has been happening in this district over nine years.
And most people don't know about the hidden gem that old Oakland is.
So my name is Viviana Rodriguez, and we are at E14 Gallery in Old Oakland.
So it was a pop-up for the holidays, and it went from a one-month pop-up to six months to now we've been here nine years in November.
What motivated us to start the scroll was us coming together as businesses to support one another because we know that in supporting one another, we all thrive.
If we're all doing well, Oakland does well.
If we spend money locally, then it stays in the community longer.
My name is Shem Wien, and we are at the Museum of Art and Digital Entertainment.
When we're looking at spots, we're looking for locations that were close to public transit that were really accessible to our community and to the people who would need access to technology education and our collection.
The summer stroll is really important because when we think about nonprofits that serve the community, we also have to think about the state of the community itself.
And when it comes to the surrounding businesses, we really want them to be thriving because that means that it's going to be a better community for all of the children who are coming in for a free Saturday morning classes.
It's going to be safer for people who are coming in later at night after work in order to play video games, to connect with old friends.
Just all of those different things that are important inside of a community.
So when we started, we didn't have the capacity or money to close the street.
So we were doing it on the sidewalk.
We actually started with doing a crawl.
So it was like every business doing something in their business and us encouraging them to walk around.
And then being able to close the streets, then we're able to offer more things for people.
So having games, having face painting, like all of those things allowed for people to have space also to hang around a little bit longer.
If you're not comfortable being indoors, then we have the outdoor space to hang out.
If you have a kid that's energetic and needs, you know, to run around, there's a safe space and place for them to like run around and do some activities and also bringing in organizations that support that.
We have the Prescott Circus, which is an amazing after-school program.
So they come, hang out, and also the youth get to see this amazing area and know that they can come to this area and hang out.
My name is Anthony.
I'm the chef and owner of Papoca in Oakland, and we serve Salvadorian-inspired food.
We are in Old Oakland because it's a beautiful area with a lot of cool businesses nearby.
It is the heart of Oakland.
There's so many great things about it.
There's a beautiful market across the street.
I think the importance of the stroll is to bring people out so they can see what else is here to get to get movement in the area.
It's like I feel like it's an underused area, it's a little underrated, and there's just so much that it offers, and we just want people to come out and kind of see what's in the area.
People want this to be safe when they see people out here.
And I think that it also brings business to the area, which brings more financial wealth, which reduces crime and danger.
So I think that's a really big part of it as well, is just getting the economics working through the city, so that we can really take care of people so that they don't feel like they need to do crime.
My name is Nicole Garay.
I'm the senior director with KC Family Programs, Bay Area Field Office, and we are a private operating foundation that helps to support youth and families that are involved in the child welfare system.
Our mission is to provide improve and eliminate the need for foster care across the nation.
So the stroll is actually a part of what we call building communities of hope.
And it is a way for us to invite networking, community supports, really understanding and knowing that the fabric of a community is where and how people are successful outside of their own small circle.
Supporting small businesses, supporting businesses of color, bringing people out, and also focusing on the whole family, not just like you know, the people going to the restaurants or the bars or whatever.
It's it's about the whole community.
So all the events that we have come together to create have been about that, about having something fun for the entire family.
We are not looking for someone outside of the city to come and save ourselves, it's about Oaklanders, and we can do it right here.
So let's start an old Oakland.
Hello and welcome to Trail Chats.
I'm your host, Autumn King.
Today we are trekking and chatting with Rowena Brown, Councilmember at large.
Come along with us as we search for white butterflies.
So it's been good thus far.
A little chilly today, but not so bad.
Not so bad.
So we are here with council member at large, Rowena Brown.
How are you?
I'm good.
Thank you for being here with me today.
I appreciate that.
How does your Oakland story begin?
Wow, um, to tell a story about me, I have to tell talk about my family.
Um so that would start with my dad.
My dad was actually one of 13.
Okay.
Um originally from Plainview, Texas, Southeast Texas.
Um, and my great uncle was actually the first to come to California.
Um, and he was the first to own a home in East Oakland.
Okay.
Um, right on Olive in 79th, right by a Royal Viejo Park.
Uh-huh.
So he was the first of the family to come, and then eventually my dad and his siblings all came.
All thirteen.
All thirteen.
Okay.
Right?
Two sets of twins in there.
Um, my dad, um, you know, grew up actually, he ended up growing up in Richmond.
Um, and then uh met my mom at community college, uh, culinary school.
Okay.
And um, and then eventually, um, I'm the youngest, I have two older brothers.
Okay.
And um, yeah, it's just really an interesting story.
Like, have you always been, have you all always been in the East Bay?
Always been in the East Bay.
And like the truth is, like, you know, a lot of people ask me, like, Rowena, like, where did you grow up?
All over.
I don't know.
Right.
Like, I I went to preschool and kindergarten in San Francisco, Chinatown.
Went to first through third grade in Richmond.
Okay.
Um, and then for a period of time I was homeschooled.
Okay.
Um, and then ended up going to Laney College for high school.
You know how you could do the homeschool slash community college.
Yeah.
And so that's like that's a little bit of my educational story.
But to know me is to know that, you know, basically the reason why I moved around a lot is because by the time I was 11 months, uh, my mom actually went missing.
And so then my dad ended up going into the the military.
Mm-hmm.
And so my auntie took care of me and my brothers.
And every weekend, she would drop us off Friday, six o'clock at my uncle's house, East Oakland.
Okay.
So from the time I was a baby until third grade, it's that was the that was the routine.
That was a routine.
And so, you know, grew up playing in a Royal Viejo Park, walking the East uh East Mot Mall.
Not so low though.
I was gonna say, I hope your cousins was with you.
Cousins and my brothers, two older brothers, so you know, I was good, right, and also like, you know, in line, if you would.
I like that.
Yeah, so always been in the East Bay, um, and always had a connection to Oakland, specifically through East Oakland.
Yeah.
What made you choose to live, work and play here in Oakland?
Once you got your degree, once you moved on and you were ready for the real world, you could have gone to any of these cities.
Yeah.
What made Oakland your spot?
I mean, yeah, I mean, that's that's that's really uh thank you for asking that.
So ultimately, um, so right before I gr was about to graduate high school, my dad passed away.
And so it was because of my my friends and my church family, they said, Hey Rowena, come come live with us.
And so they live right by um Kaiser Oakland.
Okay.
And so that was really when I kind of was like, Wow, you know what, like Oakland is feeling like home, right?
And and to also to know me is that I from that time I was 12, I always knew that I didn't have the language for it, but I always knew that I was like queer, um, you know, something.
I knew something was something was a little bit different about me.
Right.
Um, and Oakland just had was just this home for me where I could like really like find my belonging and just find community, right?
And so at a time I I'm sure you maybe you've lost someone that you really love, and so at that time, just really being here in Oakland, it is exactly what I needed.
Um, and so um and also at the same time, so after my my dad passed away, um I ended up uh just kind of going uh um into the work into the workforce.
And so I actually spent I ended up going to a trade school to learn how to be an optician.
Okay, right.
So you know how when you go and you get your glasses, um I was that person that helped you, right?
And so I did that for seven years, right?
Trust me, I I also think that my eyeglass style is pretty cool too.
And I I probably got about 25 pairs of glasses, but anyway, that's a whole nother story.
So basically I spent seven years working for like this innovative optical retail company.
They ended up like sending me all across the the United States on like leadership training.
Yeah, and so it was really like so.
While my peers were like off going to college, I'm working in this like amazing innovative space, honing in on my leadership skills, um, ended up getting recruited to work for Kaiser in their optical, okay.
Um, and it was an interesting experience.
So Oakland Kaiser, right?
So I'm there, I'm like, okay, this seems okay, the pay's good, but then eventually, and you know how like sometimes like when you when you kind of lose the people that you care the most about, um, sometimes like you're just kind of stuck in this mode of like, okay, I'm just trying to make it.
Just trying to survive, right?
Just trying to make it.
And different from thriving.
Right.
You're just trying you're just like, hey, like I'm just trying to make it.
Now don't get me wrong, I love the job that I was doing, it allowed me to travel and all of these things, but then eventually there's this point where I said to myself, Well, actually, Rowena, like what's something that you've always wanted to do?
What do you really want to do?
And so then I was like, you know what, I want to go back to school.
And so I enrolled into Laney College.
Okay.
Um, ended up taking further rooting you in Oakland.
Right.
Right.
And so enrolled into Laney College, took my first political science course, and it was really kind of like in that moment, as I'm like connecting with my classmates, like I find out they have like a lot of shared experiences as me.
Right.
I talk about, you know, my mom, yeah.
She went missing when I was just 11 months.
We would wouldn't find out what happened to her.
My dad was in the military when he got home.
Um you know, he ended up getting discharged because he was really sick.
And then once he kind of got things together, he ended up getting incarcerated for a time, right?
And so, and then my brother also kind of dealt with those same things, and I would go visit different family members, and you know, they would be the communities that we lived in, right?
Like not clean, yeah, blighted properties, right?
Um, folks losing their homes, this all of these things, and I would talk to other people and they're like, Yeah, you know, my my pops is incarcerated too.
I don't know my mom, and I just be really beginning to think, like, why are things like that?
Yeah, um, and so kept taking more courses in political science.
I got to go and do a study abroad in China.
Okay.
And so, um, from that, and so uh the when I studied abroad in China, I was studying like governmental systems and how they work, and so when I came back, I enrolled into Mills College for the rooting in Oakland.
Right.
Uh, right?
I love to say that I actually received like most of my higher education right here in town.
Yeah, right.
I mean, and then I think it's beautiful too, because there's a lot of like Oakland grown folks that are teaching in these colleges.
That's exactly why I keep underscoring it every time you say it.
Because again, that shows the fabric.
Yeah, it shows the roots, and it lets you know the intellect and the eloquence that we have around us to learn from and with.
You know, one of the first classes that I actually took at Lane at uh Laney College was this course called the Black Panther Party Strategies for Organizing the People, and it was taught by Erica Huggins.
Uh-huh.
And if that's it, you get into class and you sit down and you're like, this is the Erica Huggins, right?
And so like one of the projects she has, like, so cool.
One of the projects she had had us do was to um think of something in your neighborhood that you would want to improve.
Yeah.
And so we all got to present on these projects.
And so one thing that I um I mean and my group, we created a senior center that had transportation, provided groceries.
Nice.
Right, and and then other folks created like affordable housing.
Right.
And so it's just really it's really clearly see where you get the the foundation for why you ran for office and why you are now our city's at large council member representing the entire city, not just one zone area, one district, but you are at large, meaning that you represent all of us, and so I under I can see now the history, starting as a baby in East Oakland every weekend with uncle through going to college, going living by Kaiser, so that's North Oakland, coming back down, you're in downtown for Chinatown near Laney.
You are truly rooted in Oakland.
Absolutely.
How about we walk some more, chat some more?
I've got a lot of questions based on the things you talked about.
Let's do it.
Let's keep walking.
I'm interested a little bit if you're not there, okay.
It is out here.
I mean, the tranquility, the beauty, the smells, it's so calming.
It's very calming, very calming.
So you touched on some big things.
We were talking about um your upbringing, uh your roots, and how Oakland has shaped you.
Um it makes it pretty clear to me why you went into local government.
Um can you tell me briefly what was that last spark?
What was that last thing?
Was it a camel, a straw break in a camel's back moment?
An epiphany moment that made you say, I can and want to lead my city by being an elected official.
Was there one moment?
I think it's really a collection of moments to be quite honest.
Um, yeah, that's such a good question.
I think yeah, I think there was a collection of moments, and when you end up working for an elected official, you um you're in the work.
You're doing the work.
Yeah, right.
And so um, and so then, and so I got to, I found myself being able to work and solve so many complex problems.
You know, I used to work in Oakland City Hall, left, went to law school, started working in the legislature, and we're working on these big issues that not only help improve the lives of Oaklanders, but throughout the state of California, and so I was doing that, but I think the part that really helped push me actually had more to do with confidence.
Right?
Confidence that like Rowena, you have good ideas, you have good ideas, you're smart, you care, you care for the right reasons, right?
And then also this other piece around like, hey, like people will be motivated by your story, where you've come from and the and the type of impact that you're trying to make.
Um, so just just do it.
And then I think there's also this other piece too that like when you're interested in, I'm the type of person that when I'm interested in something, I I'm not just gonna be like, hey, I'm running for president.
No, no experience.
Yeah, I'm gonna like put myself in these places and spaces so that I can learn from others.
Yeah, um, and so that's what I did, and so literally for about a decade before I even got to 2024, right?
I was in those spaces.
Learning, learning, sucking it up, right?
Okay, but you also chose because you can motivate people, you can tell your story from behind the scenes.
You put yourself out there.
Uh elected officials put themselves out there.
How do you maintain the balance and well-being of your mental and physical and emotional health?
Well, I mean, I focus on, you know, this is a big job of trying to like help change the lives of others, right?
In a positive way.
So I just try to focus on that, not take myself too seriously, and um, and then I guess is maybe just like a balance between like, hey, this is what I'm doing.
I got like I care a whole lot about my work, and also I'm human.
Like, and that's I mean, and and and maybe I made it too broad or too big.
Specifically speaking, I feel that we in Western culture don't speak enough about maintaining and uh our our mental and emotional well-being.
Oh, for sure.
We don't, I think in the black American community, we don't do well about talking about and approaching our mental and emotional well-being and health.
And so I just wanna be blunt and ask.
You are juggling a great deal in the public eye, and you're working on behalf of the people.
What do you do for Rowena Brown's mental and emotional stability and well-being?
How do you pour into you?
Yeah, I think I hope that you know, the the beautiful thing is that I've kind of had certain practices already in the mix, so I'm not starting from scratch, right?
As a youngster, my auntie um had us going to therapy, right?
So I actually started really young, and then even in uh difficult moments of my life, that's always been a practice of mine.
So I kind of have that as a foundation, and I know that that's probably like um that's rare, right?
Um, and then along with that, when I was a student at Mills, um I got into two things, and it was actually courses that I took when I was at Mills College, yoga, and I took an intro to meditation class.
And so, so those are all foundational things that are a part of my like everyday, um, and it's just needed because you gotta be able to let things go, because otherwise you're just gonna be holding on to a lot of stuff.
And I appreciate you being willing to share that.
I feel like we need to destigmatize the conversations and make them as normal as possible, just the same way that we're talking about your everyday job and what you're eating, and talking about how we maintain and approach our mental health and well-being, especially as black women, I feel is just key.
Okay, physically, what are you doing to get out physically and keep yourself going?
So that is an opportunity because you know, I'm in all these committees, I'm in all these uh committee meetings, I'm on these boards and commission, right?
Well, that don't really give me that much, but it's more like you know, I'm not able the my schedule is not a hundred percent my own.
And so I have to really like I'm still I'm only six months in, so I think that I'm still trying to get creative about being more active.
So lately I've I've been into um kickboxing, I've been taking some kickboxing classes.
Um that a few years ago, it's kind of fun.
Um love to walk the lake, um, love going on hikes like this, um, but just gotta do more.
And then are you into the you know about the aura rings?
I've got my biometric.
Um, so that is actually been like helping me, like, know, like, oh wow, you barely moved today, so like let's do something different tomorrow.
I'll just be fighting with mine.
Like, I know I move more than this.
Yeah, I don't I don't I don't second guess it.
Oh my gosh, you have to I'm like it's this is what it is.
Let's let's clearly we need to walk somewhere so we can talk about AI.
No, you need to second guess it, but or else okay, okay, deal.
Okay, let's just walk and see if we can get you to second guess your or maybe I should not.
Maybe I should stop second guessing mine.
Because are you feeling like you're not getting all the steps or like what's I feel like I'm getting cheated?
Like I done more work than I'm getting credit for.
That's interesting, okay.
Okay, let's talk about that.
Let's see.
I feel I've lost too much.
And I don't get my credit.
Because clearly I'm wearing it more.
Let's hope that uh I don't know if I can't like I'm always getting around.
I think that's what's up.
I'm sorry.
No, I'm not the youngest, I don't need a project.
That was like a hundred.
This has been some really good conversation.
Thank you.
Thank you for your time.
I um we learned a lot about who you are.
I've learned a lot about why you do what you do.
What are we thinking for the future?
What do you see?
What is your vision for the city of Oakland?
Wow, I love that question.
My vision for for Oakland is, you know, I'm only six months in, and so right now I'm just we just passed the budget.
I just got to be in a leadership role for my very first budget.
And so I'm really just trying to learn all that I can so that I can actually make um, you know, help create change here in the city.
Um that was a part of my promise, right?
Um, and you know, I really when I think about Oakland, like I really think that we can create like a city where everyone is thriving.
Not just not just downtown, but like I'm fully you heard my story around like where I spent all my weekends as a kid, right?
Yeah, deep East Oakland.
And so I want to, you know, create like an East Oakland, you know, East Mont Town Center.
Like, what would it look like if we reactivate like that entire space?
It's already on its way with the black.
So we like we we we love to see it, right?
And so ultimately I just really want to create an Oakland where um, you know, maybe like Oakland could be like a model for other places.
It already is.
Right?
But like but like really like, hey, how did y'all y'all were struggling with public safety?
How'd you do it?
And that's what I'm saying to you.
It already is.
Yeah.
Let's take it to the next level.
I hear I hear what you're saying.
And then I think the other thing that I've really been saying consistently, I think that we're we're at a new time, like with leadership within the city of Oakland, right?
You got new council members, we're all working well together.
We got a new mayor.
It is a dream come true to be working with um our with Barbara Lee, right?
Like I've known her since I was a Barbara, right?
Like I've known her since I'm a little I was a little girl, and to be like, I was just on a panel with her, and um, and so it's just been like so amazing to be able to really like watch and learn from her, and then even for her to say, hey Rowena, so tell us what what what was written into the budget, and here I am sharing out like okay, we we did this, we're doing this for small businesses, we're doing this for you know, cultural districts here in the city of Oakland, and so um I can't help but like I'm always grateful.
I'm just grateful for the opportunity to serve, and so um, you know, uh the future, my future, I you know, it's yeah, tell me about your future as at large.
Um, usually when when council members are chatting with me about their district, it's easy to not easy, but it's it's you know, it's now small it's focused.
Um what is your vision for your position as at large taking care of all of us?
Yeah, I mean, I I first off I think of it like a partnership, right?
So whether we're talking about district one, hey, how can I work and support you with your constituency, right?
And so I really want to do that across with every single council member.
Um, but then you know, I I've I've witnessed in the past where you know, some of our colleagues, some of my colleagues, they haven't been able to get things across the finish line, right?
And really show up and advocate for areas of our city city that have been underinvested in.
And so I want to be that I got you.
Right?
Like I'm here, I'm here to support you, right?
And so I really think of the role like that.
And I also think of my role, you know, we're having worked at the state level.
I also think of my role as like, hey, what is happening at the state level?
How can I be a good advocate and continue those like those relationships across across um, you know, one of the things that I studied in school was governmental systems and how they work, and so um I've always been interested in like, hey, how does local government interact with the county?
How are we interacting with the state and at the federal level?
And so that's something that I'm like, I think of it like a will.
We just gotta really gotta get it to turn for the benefit of, you know, Oaklanders.
And local government is really where we can see change.
Um, I tell folks all the time that there are you can get frustrated at the federal level without a doubt, you feel lost.
You can sometimes feel not completely on shaky on solid ground at the state level, but local government being able to have this conversation with you.
Now you know me, you got my phone number and I've got yours.
We can talk in a different way, we can approach issues in a different way, and I appreciate your openness to that.
I I see that you are one who is looking to listen to the community, partner with nonprofit organizations, partner with individuals to move things forward.
I appreciate that about you.
Thank you for serving us in that way.
Yeah.
I like to think of myself as uh just being a really good listener.
Well, let's keep walking and talking some more, if you don't mind.
Let's do it.
All right.
I will say the butterfly conversation that you brought up is ridiculously interesting to me.
I do think that I will just feel so far.
I've never heard of that.
Yeah, and it was like those kind of one of the things like always, like whenever they say it pops up.
What are you doing?
What are you doing in the world?
And I don't know, like it's like I see you.
Hello, and welcome to Trail Chats.
I'm your host, Autumn King.
Today, we're trucking and chatting with District Six Council Member Kevin Jenkins.
Come along with us as we explore these East Oakland Trails.
First of all, thank you for joining us.
I appreciate you spending some time out here in nature with us.
Absolutely.
Thank you for having me.
Tell me about Kevin.
Where does your Oakland story begin?
To tell you about Kevin, I have to tell you who Kevin is, right?
And so Kevin is Elijah's stat.
Okay.
That's my biggest responsibility in the world.
And Elijah's my nine-year-old son now.
And so I am who I am because of him.
And so I grew up in Oakland, ended up going to Oakland high school.
Uh, went to Laney College and College of Alameda, and really embody what Oakland is.
I love being an Oaklander.
I'm so incredibly proud to be an Oaklander.
What does that mean?
What is being an Oaklander mean to you?
So I think being an Oaklander is proud of your heritage, proud of where you come from, proud of the activism that is rooted in our city.
Okay.
It is proud to be where you're from.
Even though the world will say that Oakland is this, and they sensationalize the negative things that are going on with Oakland.
It's remaining and having that pride in your city.
And why did you choose to stay in Oakland?
You said you were born and raised here in Oakland.
Why, why stay in Oakland?
Why live in Oakland?
Why work in Oakland?
So I I said this to some of my residents all the time.
There's no better place in Oakland.
Even though when there are things that are going on that are challenges to our city, we have the best views, best hikes, we have some of the best small businesses, some of the best wineries right here in Oakland, and weather is amazing.
So if it's not 70 degrees either way, people are complaining.
So tell me a little bit about your role as a leader here in the city of Oakland.
We do a lot of talking on this show about the pride that people have in Oakland, and we're talking to Oakland leaders.
Tell me about what that means to you being an Oakland leader and what is it that you do?
Yeah, so I currently serve as a city council member for district six, but I kind of reject the title of leader, right?
It's more of a servant job, right?
And so I consider it like a quarterback.
There's so many multi-levels of government that people don't understand for one reason or another.
So I'll get people that call me and say, I haven't received my mail in five days.
Now we have no jurisdiction over the United States Post Office, but it's our job to point folks in the right direction, right?
So some people will have issues with uh a lady called me about a vector issue, right?
So she was like, hey, there are mice and all these.
Okay, you have to call Alameda County.
What's the number?
I know it off the top of my head.
And so you have to be that person, and then it is a servant position.
You have to really like serving the people.
You have to really have a heart for serving folks.
How long have you felt this way?
Has this some been something that's always been in you that you thought I want to give to my city?
That's an interesting question.
I think it's been ingrained in me since a child.
So I did tutoring when I was younger for my mom, her, she had students that might not have been up to grade level with math or reading, and so I'd volunteer and give my time.
And so I think that's when it was instilled in me.
So can you talk to me a little bit about what does it look like as your purview?
What can you do?
How do we support you and how do we use you in the right way?
We as our residents use you in the best way.
So someone told me either I'm crazy or I like challenges to be on city council, right?
And I've noticed I've had a few more gray hair because I've been on city council, but that comes with the territory.
City Council, again, it's a community servant role, right?
You are an advocate for your community, ensuring that the city is getting resources to your residents, and you're cutting the tape of bureaucracy.
Also, we pass the budget, we also make laws and ordinances, and we work with the administration to just make the city a better place.
Can we get into some specifics?
Give me an example.
So if there is a illegal if there's a legal dumping in a neighborhood, should we call our city council person to have conversation about that?
Let's say we've been calling 311 and we can't get through.
Is that something that you would do?
I see that as a two-pon answer, right?
So if it is continuously happening, I think that causes for a meeting and seeing how we can do a better job of enforcing the illegal dumping.
Normally what we tell people, as frustrating as it is, call 311, right?
And once you get that 311 ticket, if the city isn't responding fast enough for one reason or another, then that's when you contact your city council person and say, hey, I need this illegal dumping mode.
Okay.
And you talked about policy.
So if we're talking about uh where new bike lanes might be, or give me an example of of policy that would be passed and how the council members work with residents to get to that end goal.
That's a really interesting question.
It depends on what type of policy, right?
Let's say there's a policy, and you want new books in the library or something, right?
And so it'll go through committee, right?
And there's standing committees that council members serve on four at a time, right?
Go through there.
Once it's passed there, right, it will go to the full council.
So people have the and residents have the ability to weigh in at the committee level, and they have the ability to weigh in at the full council.
You can send emails, you can call your council person, you can show up to meetings.
There's a number of different ways that you can get involved.
So connecting with you would be a great way to then have my voice heard.
If my neighbors and I were to get together and share some of the issues, kind of have our town, our block meetings, then we would carry that to you and you carry our water forward.
So maybe it's possible, right?
But it the district is very large.
And so you might feel this way, but a large swath of the district might feel a different way, right?
And so it's then on the council member to make the best decision based off of their district and based off of the overall health of the city.
You said the health of the city.
So one of the things that I find that is so fortunate about us as Oaklanders is that we've got this wonderful backyard of nature that we can just go and kind of decompress.
Yeah.
Talk to me a little bit about your mental and emotional health.
How do you maintain and focus on your mental and emotional health?
I have to be very diligent about and intentional about focusing on mental health.
And so what I like to do is go on a lot of hikes, especially through the Redwoods and Oakland, and I take friends on hikes as well, and it's a way for me to meet up with friends and just catch up.
Also, I go to the gym every morning to ensure that I'm lifting weights and focused in on what it is that I need to do for myself for the city for my family.
I do that too.
I like to do checklists in my head as I'm going on my walks and kind of knock things off the list.
Talk to me a little bit about your hopes and desires for District 6 and for the City of Oakland.
Let me turn that around a little bit.
Your District 6 resident.
What is it that you want to see out of the district?
What do I want for my district is health.
Um I want healthy economics, I want healthy environment, I want healthy homes.
That sounds cliche, it sounds big, but I think that it starts with having a walkable blocks.
I love being able to walk from my house to the market to grab things, not having to get in the car.
Um health of my streets, I don't want to see abandoned cars on my corner for months at a time because we're backed up for 90 days.
I don't want to see, you know, dumping on certain corners.
Um I want families to be out in the street walking and talking and waving to one another.
Cornball, cliche, maybe, but I've experienced it here in Oakland.
I've experienced it in other in other when I lived in in a different district.
So that's kind of some of my hopes and and once for my district.
It's interesting.
I was just seeing where we're aligned, you being a district six resident.
So for me, the biggest thing is quality of life issues.
And I think we're talking about the same thing, right?
I know that I'm safe when I'm walking to the store.
I know that I'm safe when I'm at the ATM.
Right.
I am a big proponent of walkable communities, right?
And ensuring that my market is next to me, my bank is next to me, my grocery store is next to me.
Also, just want Oaklanders to really feel safe in their neighborhoods.
Too often I'm getting some of my seniors calling me saying, Kevin, I'm not exercising anymore because I'm afraid someone's gonna knock me over, and they're crying, right?
And so I want that to change.
I want people to feel safe, and so that's my big thing for Oakland and District 6.
So we're aligned in that way.
So quality of life, we're aligned in that way.
How do I, as a resident of D6 and my and my fellow neighbors, support you in making that happen?
I see it as we're a team, and you've said cliche, you said cornball, you said these things.
These are the things that I thought maybe you were thinking about my ideas, sir.
So it it's really we're a team, and systemically there's been disinvestment from East Oakland, right?
And so we have to highlight that there has been systemic disinvestment, and also we have to address that.
We have to address that when the budget comes, and we're talking equity, and so what I need from you and other district six residents is showing up to the meetings, right?
Making sure that your voice is heard because they're about the same hundred people come to a city council meeting, and it's not necessarily the voice of the district, right?
And so, what I need from district six residents is calling in, showing up.
What do you want your legacy to be in district six and in the city of Oakland as council member?
That I was a hard worker, that I served people, that residents were able to connect to with government, that District 6 was able to turn around the historic disinvestment and get the investment from the city.
Um, the Coliseum project is one of the biggest things on my list to get done, and so just ensuring that District six has a place where residents is a place where residents can be really happy with, can go and have a meal with their family, can walk and feel safe for the city.
I think it's restoring the pride in Oakland.
Um turn around this negative media uh stigmatism of we are a crime ridden city, dirty streets and not taking care of our unsheltered residents.
So really getting back into Oakland is a wonderful place with wonderful uh hikes with wonderful people with proud folks.
And so if I could do that, I'd be really happy with my legacy.
Well, cheers to your legacy.
We are in alignment with a lot of things.
I'm really excited and grateful for you for coming out here and chatting.
I'd love to chat some more because as I said, I am one of your residents.
So now that I've got you, I'm gonna chat it up and ask you all the questions that I can.
Thanks so much for joining us.
Thank you for sharing your time and really letting us know a little bit more about who you are and what you do with the city.
I appreciate it.
I look forward to coming back.
Let's do some more walking.
We can chat it up some more as we walk.
Let's do it.
Let's do it.
This is this is this is Oaklanders on the line.
Oaklanders, we are so back for another episode, the second to last episode of this limited series, Oaklanders on the line.
I'm your host as always, Noel California, and let's get into it.
Episode one, we got to ask people why Oakland, why they chose to be here, stay here, move here, why they defend Oakland, why they represent Oakland, just why in general.
And on this episode, I want to ask people, what is Oakland?
What does it mean to them?
How do they define it?
So let's pick up the phone and get Oaklanders on the line and have them paint a picture of what the town is.
Yo, who we got on the line right now?
Who we listening to?
Hey, right now you're listening to Corey Johnson, aka Sunspot Jones.
How y'all doing?
Doing great.
Glad to have you on the line.
Well, I got you here.
In your words, what is Oakland?
Please define it for us.
No, I mean Oakland is basically just a magical place that everyone kind of influences the world with.
I feel like there's so many people that know about the bay.
When I go to place I go to Norway, I go to Germany, I go to Australia, I go to Bali.
Like people know Oakland, they people know the music that's come out of Oakland.
They know the art.
They know all the different things that have been created to show the world that it's it's just a magical, beautiful place and celebration of art experience here.
Once again, that's my brother man Corey.
He's a fellow cultural strategist in government, working with the mayor's office and a resident of district eight.
Just think of 2017 Raiders versus Jets.
It's a nice Sunday afternoon.
You got March on on the sideline.
You got Kick the Sneak Plan in the whole stadium, and you got Marshawn tournament at the whole stadium of 60,000 people in the Coliseum.
That's what Oakland is.
I feel like Oakland, you go anywhere, you see it, you smell it, it.
It's the art, it's the sounds.
I feel like that's the real inspiration.
That's the real heart of Oakland.
And like, despite all the crazy shit that go down, there's real beauty, there's real culture in Oakland that people need to put that shit on a pedestal instead of like, oh, businesses are closing down.
Oh, people bipping too much.
Like, nah, you need to put the love for Oakland on a pedestal.
And Marco's right.
I'd bet you five bucks if you type in Oakland news, you'd probably find a negative article.
And while we're portrayed one way, we still find ways to thrive.
It's dynamic.
It's complicated.
It's frisky, it's gritty.
It's uh it's real.
There's a deep sense of beauty and justice that's important to how the city presents itself.
As a cultural affairs manager, I look at like the many ways our cultural community celebrates and honors and brings beauty to life.
That's Roberto.
He works in cultural affairs.
We had a conversation recently, and we both agreed that there needs to be an attempt to revitalize Oakland.
Our next resident on the line is Kev Choice.
He's a former cultural strategist in government.
Create at a high level for such a small space.
We have a wide influence around the world for such a small compact area.
Oakland is rich, culturally rich, often overlooked, often underestimated, but always continuing to grow to grow and evolve.
It's like a mixing pot where people can come.
And if you have an independent and community mindset, you can find a way to thrive.
I feel like it's a place that is often you know looked down on, underestimated, but we always continue to rise.
We always continue to create.
Oakland is in the class of kind of considered second-tier cities.
You have your Baltimore, which would be second tier to DC.
And you have your smaller port cities, Portland, you know, things like that.
These places are kind of forgotten, kind of isolated, kind of weird art pockets.
Oakland to me means Oakland has its own separate from those cities.
Oakland has its own very distinct sort of community soul to it.
That didn't seem to exist in other places as much.
That's Billy Joe Agin Jr., co-owner of the Stork Club.
And he told me a lot about what he thinks Oakland is, and he believes the city can get better.
I think Oakland is that one city that can't really be described unless you experience it.
And everyone that I've ever introduced to the town has always been amazed by what they found.
Because it's never what they expected.
That's Emiliano Via.
He's a producer, model, actor, singer.
And we met through our media line of work.
Something that I think is uniquely Oakland is the sense of community here.
Um it's the number one quality that stands out to visitors.
Uh the friendliness of people in the streets, in bars, at markets and festivals.
Anywhere that you go, that is a social place.
Oaklanders are gonna be welcoming with a smile, dancing, having a good time.
That's just our culture here.
I think that's something that is part of our identity here growing up, and I think it's something that we want to spread to other people.
Dear Oakland, I love you for all your magic, diversity, beauty, and history.
Thank you for being home and always being there.
I'll see you at the lake.
Love, yeah.
Because of the personal attention, given every caller, you might experience a brief delay.
Please remain on the line.
A representative will assist you shortly.
This is Emiliano Villa, and you're listening to Oaklanders on the line.
Oh, key.
Since Oakland is offering uh compost services, they're visible as compostable.
Oh, honey, it's not.
I called the recycling hotline yesterday and asked the same question, and they said dog poo goes in the trash.
Oh.
Things like like uh diapers, hangers, uh garden hoses, um, plastic wrappers, straws, broken glass, they all go in the trash.
Oh, yeah.
How about batteries?
Batteries are special.
You've got to put them in a plastic bag and then put the plastic bag on top of the gray recycling bin.
How about our mattress?
We need a new one.
Ours is as old as our kids.
Well, the city trash collector can pick it up for free once a year.
We get a free bulky item pickup.
Things like like mattresses, refrigerators, old furniture.
They'll pick it up curbside.
Do you know what I love most about you?
You're so smart.
Come on.
To learn more about composting and Oakland's commitment to zero waste, go to Oaklandrecycles.com.
Good evening, everyone.
Good evening, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to AMLO.
Put your hands together for AMLO.
What a great place this is.
Yay!
I'm Carmen Martinez, the director of the Oakland Public Library, and I welcome you here for our annual authors program.
We usually hold it during National Library Week, but this year we are so happy and so blessed and honored to have our featured author, Ms.
Isabel Wilkerson.
I wanted you to just listen for a couple minutes to some acknowledgments I need to make.
A couple of um very important thank yous.
This is this program is all due in great part to our wonderful friends of the Oakland Public Library.
I don't know where they are tonight.
There's so many wonderful people here.
Yay, Foppel!
Thank you.
Please visit the bookmark bookstore in Old Oakland.
Every single penny, well, almost every single penny that they earn from uh that they make from selling used books goes to programs like this and for other activities that the city can't afford to help us with.
So thank you, Fopel.
I'd also like to thank our wonderful Oakland Public Library staff, Rosalia Romo, Tom Downs, and uh let me see who else is here.
Catherine Cavot, Eka, Eka Schneider, Winifred Walters, and I know I'm forgetting somebody, but I'll remember and thank them later.
Um, so I was reading one Sunday, the New York Times book review section, and I came across um a review of the warmth, the warmth of other suns.
And I thought, well, you know, Oakland just has to be in this book.
It's about the Great Migration.
And so, yay.
The very next day I was with a whole bunch of library director colleagues in San Francisco, and my colleague from Cuyahoga, Cuyahoga County, said we we welcome this fabulous author, Isabel Wilkerson.
She was fantastic.
She talked so eloquently.
Um, perhaps you can get her for your program.
And we called Random House the next day.
She was already on the superstar list, but she wanted to come to Oakland because so much of her research was based here.
So um, yeah, so we were very we were very lucky to get her.
Um, and so I need to tell you a little bit about her.
As you know, she was in Chicago bureau chief of the New York Times, and it was there that she won the first, she was the first African American woman to win a excuse me, a Pulitzer Prize in journalism, and she won it for individual reporting.
The list goes on and on.
She also won the George Polk Award and a John Simon Guggenheim fellowship, and she is currently the professor of journalism and narrative and director of narrative nonfiction at Boston University.
She was born and raised in Washington, DC, and this is her first book.
Oh, yay.
And this is her first book, which she dedicates to her parents, and I love this part.
Her parents whose migration she says made her possible.
Before I go on to bring our esteemed author up, I see that our mayor is in the audience, our mayor Jean Kwan.
Welcome, Mayor, to the program.
Would you like you just want to okay?
Okay, we're giving our mayor um 10 seconds to say hello to all of you.
Let's let's see if she can do it.
Hello.
Hello, how are you?
So let's talk about how we're gonna save the libraries.
Okay.
So first of all, um I I met with other library people this morning, and let me say that Oakland's no different than the rest of the country.
There are some people who think that we have to, after four years of cutting, that the only answer is to have an all-cuts budget, and that that means that all they want to do is cuts, they don't want to consider new taxes, they don't want to consider anything, they just want to cut.
And it's no secret that I've had a little fight with the city council because had they at least given the voters the chance to decide two months ago when I asked them, we would have known by July 5th whether or not we had a parcel tax, and that that would have made sure that not only the libraries but many other programs like our senior programs and our rec centers would have survived pretty much without major cuts.
And so what I'm asking people to do, there's a budget hearing tomorrow, and to talk to your council member, at least let the community decide.
So why do I need this money and do you want to talk about really quickly?
We've gone from four years of cuts.
This will be the fifth year of cuts, and last year in particular, we were hard hit because if you own a house, how many of you bought a house within the last five years?
anybody here?
You got an automatic property tax deduction, right?
Well, that cost the city 28 million dollars.
Um, that means in one year we had to cut 28 million dollars, and we have to find a way to let the recession end and get our property taxes back up so we can maintain services.
It is so bad this year.
We've cut so many things that we may not be able to meet the minimum of major Q.
Now, I wrote major Q, so this is like deja vu for me.
Um, when my first meeting as a city council member, Robert Bob said he was gonna close, I think a quarter of all the rec centers, I know, and and and and uh and all a third of all the libraries.
So, major q needs to be protected.
The only way it can be protected is if we do the parser tax.
Secondly, I just want to say AMLO is an amazing institution because of what it does.
I spoke at the ethnic studies graduation yes uh last week at UC Berkeley.
Their archives are not as complete in some areas as ours are, and so we do need to work and we need to protect it.
And the way you can do that is join the friends of this group to help increase the activity and the usage of this institution, and secondly, help me get the parcel tax on the ballot and vote for it.
Thank you.
Okay, without further ado now, I do present Miss Isabel Wilkerson.
It means so much for me to be here in Oakland because this was one of the cities that I went to when I started working on this book.
You know, I spent 15 years on this book, as you all probably know.
You probably heard it over and over again.
And as you probably heard me say, if you've heard any of my talks, I always say that if it were a human being, it would be a live and dating.
That's how long it took to finish this.
It's a good thing I didn't know it would take this long because I probably would not have even begun it, and I am so glad I did.
I'm so glad I did.
Um, thank you.
All of you turned out today are representing some ways a celebration, not of certainly not of me, hopefully in some ways of the book, but more importantly for all of the people who may not be with us today who are the reason why we are even here, which is what propelled me to write this book to begin with.
I wrote this book because I am a child of the very phenomenon I've written about.
I'm sure that the room is filled with people who are children of the great migration or of a migration from someplace else.
How many of you are?
It is all of our stories.
The book is putatively the subtitle is the epic story of America's Great Migration.
But in many respects, the book is not about this great migration truly.
It is about the longing, the fortitude, the faith, and the courage that is the responsible for all of us being here right now in this place, in our space right now.
In other words, somebody had to do what these people did for us to even be sitting or standing here today.
Truly.
And so the question was what did it take?
What did it take?
What did they leave?
What did they give up?
What were the sacrifices that they and so many other people made in order for us to be here today?
And also it was written with such a in such a way as to ask the reader to think, what would you have done?
What would you have done had you been in the same place as the people in this book?
As the people who, you know, we're talking about this as a book, but this is not just a book.
This is people's lives.
These are real people who are the ancestors, the parents, the grandparents, the great grandparents of pretty much everybody in this room, because we all are descended from people who came a long way away to get here.
To get to California means you came a long way away.
You had to cross an ocean or you had to cross a continent, but you had to come a long way away.
And I have to say, just to give you a little background on myself, if you don't know, I am the product of a mixed marriage.
My mother was from Georgia, father from Virginia.
I call that a mixed marriage.
My mother was from Rome, Georgia, and I love to say that she's from Rome, Georgia, because I'll just say she's from Rome, and they say, Wow, she's from Rome.
And then I say Georgia, they say, Oh.
And my father was from Virginia, and they came, they went to Washington, DC, which was the beginning of the end of Jim Crow, you might say, on the East Coast.
And they came in different years and they met and they married and they had me.
And as a result of their participation in the Great Migration, which is similar to the migration experiences of so many other people, who are American, I wouldn't even exist had they not done that.
How many of you would not have existed had someone not come a long way away from far, far away and met someone who they never would have met otherwise, created whole new lineages.
In other words, half the room would disappear because we wouldn't even have existed.
And so that's why I approached this book, this project with such a tremendous sense of gratitude.
Gratitude that I exist, gratitude that they made the great sacrifice in order for this to happen.
Now, I want to talk a little bit about what the migration is because you know, no discussion of this is complete without recognizing the magnitude of this thing.
This migration began during World War One and did not end until the 1970s.
Didn't end until the 1970s.
It meant that six million African Americans, and this is just one wave of migration, one kind of migration that has occurred with throughout the world.
But this was the largest one that occurred within the borders of our own country.
This is the only time that people who were citizens of their own country, the United States, had to leave one part of their own homeland for another part of their own country in order to experience the rights and privileges that they had been born to as citizens.
That's astounding.
That is astounding.
And yet that is what they had to do.
This migration was so massive that when this migration began, 90%, 90% of all African Americans were living in the South.
By the time that it was over, half were living everywhere else but the South, from Boston to Chicago to Oakland and down to Los Angeles.
They were all over the country as a result of this.
It was a relocation of an entire people.
That is a lot of people who had made a decision to leave the only place that they had ever known for a place that they'd never seen in hopes that life might be better.
That takes a lot of courage.
It takes a lot of foresight.
It takes a lot of vision and it takes a lot of faith to essentially jump off a cliff into the unknown with no guarantees of success.
And so that's why I wanted to talk about, I wanted to understand what propelled people to do this.
What was it that inspired them to make this great leap of faith?
Ultimately, what this was was in some ways a defection.
This was misunderstood movement of people.
This was not people just being uh, you know, uh getting a transfer for a job.
In fact, they many of them did not know what they were going to do ultimately when they arrived.
Bear in mind that in some ways they were seeking political asylum from a caste system, which is almost impossible to comprehend now.
So you know I have to talk about that.
That caste system was something else.
That caste system had been carefully uh calibrated and designed to maintain an oversupply of cheap labor in the South, keeping them virtually imprisoned so that they would not have the options to go anywhere else.
And in order to do that, they had to make it so such that everyone understood that everyone had a role in that caste system.
And this hurt everyone, black and white.
It meant that it from the moment you woke up until the moment you went to sleep, there were rules, laws, and protocols that you had to have memorized in order to stay within the bounds of your caste and ultimately, particularly for African Americans, to stay alive.
It was a matter of life and death.
A matter of life and death.
So some of the examples are, um, as you may have heard before in any of my talks, um, that it was actually against the law in Birmingham for a black person and a white person to play checkers together, merely to play checkers together.
Someone must have seen a black person and a white person in some town square in Birmingham, and they were playing checkers together, and they might have been having too good of time.
Maybe the wrong person was winning.
Maybe they were laughing.
Who knows what they were doing.
But someone saw that, and they decided that the entire foundation of Southern civilization was in peril.
We cannot have this.
And so someone went and wrote that down as a law.
So that that meant that the black person who might have enjoyed playing checkers, and the white person who might have enjoyed playing checkers with their friend couldn't do that anymore.
They could face prison time, and you wouldn't want to face prison time, hard labor in Alabama at that time, I can assure you.
There were in courtrooms throughout the South, and it's still hard.
As many times as I've said it, it's still hard for me to believe there was actually a black Bible and a white Bible to swear to tell the truth on in courtrooms throughout the South.
A black Bible and a white Bible.
And the way that I found out about this was through uh all the research that I had to do.
There are no references to water fountains and restrooms anywhere in this book.
For any of you who've read it, you know that.
If you haven't read it, don't think that you don't worry that you're going to be reading about something you've heard about already because we know about that already.
There's no need to put that in.
No reference to right restrooms or water fountains, because we know that already.
I was looking for all the other things to make it come alive for people.
I wanted people to be able to really understand what these people had to live with day in and day out.
Black and white, actually, because we often talk about the, and we all know how limiting and restrictive it was on black people, and it certainly was.
But it also meant that white people were restricted as well.
They had created the caste system, but it was a caste system that restricted everybody's movements.
So everyone was hurt by it.
And I would argue that for those in the up putatively in the upper caste, what they lost was a spiritual loss.
They lost a piece of their own of their spiritual selves because, and also the unmet potential.
Because if you're spending so much energy holding other people down, it means that you there are other things that you're not able to do.
Because it takes a lot of energy to maintain a caste system, as I've described.
So back to the Bibles.
I found out about it because it was in an article in a North Carolina newspaper.
And it came to light, it came and made the newspaper not because anyone said, Well, this is an absurd ritual.
Why are we doing this?
Because people accepted this as the norm.
This is the way it should be.
It came to light because the uh during the middle of a trial in North Carolina, the trial had to be suspended because they couldn't find the black Bible.
A black person had taken the witness stand, which was rare enough to begin with, and they couldn't find the Bible that this person was supposed to touch.
It turned out that they that it was not acceptable.
It was against the law for a black person and a white person to touch the same sacred text.
How ironic is that?
And so that meant the bailiff, the sheriff, and all the court officers had to go all over the courtroom trying to track down the black Bible for this person to be able to touch in order to swear to tell the truth, the truth and nothing but the truth, so help them God.
And that is what they had to do.
They finally found it, and the trial could resume.
I've been asked since then, well, were was it a different version of the Bible?
Like, did the white people have the King James version and the white and the black people had the American standard maybe?
But it turned out it was the same Bible, it's just they could not touch the same sacred object.
Now, you know, I've been all over the country.
In fact, I just got back from Italy, where believe it or not, there's great interest in this great migration, and I think that's a beautiful thing.
Beautiful thing.
Isn't that amazing?
And they have been reading the book in English, and they've been studying the book because they're facing great migration issues themselves, and so they want to understand it.
But um, as I was uh as I was there, I've been all over the country, and my toughest audiences are always high school students.
So I've I've been I've been through that, and I have been searching for ways to make this come alive for them.
You know, most people seem to be seem to really understand it when I describe the two things I've described for you.
But with the high school students, I have to come up with something else.
So I finally figured out what gets through to them.
Now, before I tell you what that is, I want to first ask for a show of hands as to how many people in the last week have passed someone on the road, yeah, every hand goes up, yeah.
There's I I'm always surprised that there's a delay in the answer.
So I'm like, people think, is there a new law that says we can't do this anymore?
So they're hesitant.
Maybe she won't think so well of me if she knows I passed somebody, but you know, and it's it's perfectly legal as far as I'm as I as far as I know.
Uh, and in fact, you probably pass someone on the way here, truth be told, if you're if you're being honest.
Well, if you were African American in the South during much of the time period I've described, you couldn't do that.
You could not pass, a black motorist could not pass a white motorist on the road no matter how slowly that person was going.
No matter how slowly that person was going.
And you know how when you're behind someone who's lost or they're they're from out of town and they stop every 10 feet thinking that this is the turn, that might have happened to you yesterday, and you want so badly to get around them, and if you can, you will.
Well, you couldn't do that if you were African American, and I would argue that that is so frustrating to people that that alone could account for probably a couple million people to leave right then and there.
How they bore up under that, I'll never understand it.
And yet that was the law.
That was the law, and it and and when I describe this, I mean, we all um, you know, it seems so absurd that we can now kind of chuckle at it, but this was actually life and death.
It really was life and death.
Every four days, every four days during the time period in the decades leading up to the migration and the decades immediately following the migration, an African American was lynched every four days somewhere in the South.
So this was truly life and death.
And the reason I say that is because we know about the more commonly um uh the commonly associated reason for lynching, having to do with uh generally a black man's uh an accusation that a black man may have made some untoward uh remark toward a white woman.
That actually was not the more common reason, however, when you look at the statistics of the lynchings.
Lynchings most likely occurred because a black person had been accused of trying to act like a white person.
That was the general accusation, meaning they were stepping outside of their cash.
That's how big and significant and enduring and the and oppressive this caste system truly was.
They would be, they would be, that meant that they had been accused of of not stepping of not stepping off the sidewalk fast enough, of of speaking in a way that was not appropriate to their caste, of looking straight into the eye of someone.
It actually turned out that that the uh that the protocols were so strict that an anthropologist of that day said that the majority of people of diff of each race had not ever shaken the hand of someone of the other race because that was not allowed.
So this shows you that it was a nerve-jangling experience just to make it through the day.
And these were the kinds of things that people had to live with day in and day out.
And so ultimately, this was in some ways a search for political asylum.
Now, how and why did this migration actually begin?
There are many reasons and discussions as to why, but ultimately the precipitating event was World War I.
And during World War I, during World War I, the North had a problem.
African Americans have been wanting to leave for a long, long time, but there was really no option other than to stay there because the caste system had created a limit, so many limits and restrictions on them.
And so during World War I, Europe was at war, and that meant that all of the Europeans who had been coming in, the European immigrants who had been fueling the factories and the steel mills and the foundries were no longer available.
And the North needed labor.
And where did they look?
They looked to the cheapest labor in the land, which was African Americans in the South.
The South was the poorest region of the country, and these were the poorest paid people in the South.
Many of them were not paid at all for their labor.
They were they were working merely for the right to live on the land that they were farming.
They were sharecroppers.
So they were quite ready to be recruited to go north.
So this is a reminder for people who may not have understood much about this migration.
African Americans, most African Americans in the North and the West, arrived at the invitation, the express invitation of industries that wanted their labor.
The interesting thing about this is that they often wanted the labor.
They wanted the workers but didn't want the people.
So how do you manage that?
You know, how do you manage that?
That's a conundrum.
In any case, they've set about trying to do what they could to get them.
So they went and actually recruited, recruited people to come to these places to work.
So you have unusual combinations of cities where people, where people in the North went to recruit.
Beloit, Wisconsin went to the people there went to Mississippi, for example.
And so what happened was you have these connections.
Finally, the door opened and the people began to answer the call.
But when the South found out about this, the South did not take kindly to this at all.
They did not take kindly to the poaching of their cheap labor one bit.
And so they began to take action to stop this.
There was a great deal of hand wringing about what to do about it, and they began to do uh make great efforts.
They did they they they tried to fight it on both levels.
One, they wanted to deal with the supply side, meaning the people who were trying to leave, and on the demand side, meaning the people who were trying to recruit.
So on the supply side, what they started to do was they would arrest people on the railroad platforms when there were many, many black people waiting with set with northbound tickets ready to leave, trying to leave.
They would arrest them from the train seats.
Once they were on the train and they thought they were handing the ticket to the conductor, they're actually handing it to a sheriff who was about to arrest them.
And that was that was all these efforts to thwart their effort to get out.
And then when there were too many people to arrest, they would wave the train on through so that people who had been saving for months and months and months for that ticket to go north had to watch that train pass them by, that train to what they felt would be freedom.
And that was what they ended up having to do.
On the on the demand side, they would start arrest, they would arrest people, northerners who were who were caught recruiting without a license.
They set these incredible licensing fees.
One fee in Macon Georgia required that anyone who wanted to recruit a single black person had to pay $25,000 licensing fee.
Now, the equivalent in 2011 is half a million dollars to recruit one black person.
Who in the world would play pay that to recruit one person?
And so that was definitely going to be a dampening effort.
One would think, but actually the uh the reverse occurred.
But I want to tell you, uh, give you a little sense of what these people, what the people were thinking about, what were the Southerners thinking at the time that this was going on?
And this is a quote from Macon Telegraph, an editorial, which says so much about how the South was reacting.
And so this editorialist wrote this.
Everybody seems to be asleep about what is going on right under our noses.
That is everybody but those farmers who have waked up on mornings recently to find every Negro over 21 on his place gone.
To Cleveland, to Pittsburgh, to Chicago, to Indianapolis.
They hadn't gone to LA yet because this is World War I.
They hadn't gotten to California or Oakland yet.
And while our very solvency, our very solvency is being sucked out beneath us, we go on about our affairs as usual.
So this gives you a sense of the hand-wringing and the uh questioning and the wondering and the effort to try to keep the people from leaving, and yet every single thing that was done actually only fed the desire of the people to leave.
It had the reverse effect.
All this hand-wringing and wondering what to do, the arresting of the people on the railroad platforms only made the people want to go all the more because it gave them a sense that this was not going to be a place that was going to change anytime soon.
Now I want to talk a little bit about the uh the work on this book because you know it's been a long odyssey.
Um I talked to seniors here in Oakland, I talked to seniors in Los Angeles, I talked to seniors in uh in Chicago and New York, all in Milwaukee, all over the country, and I set about trying to talk to people in order to find out what the stories were, and it turned out that you know these people often did not perceive themselves as being a part of any great wave, which is one reason why I described this book as an this migration rather as one of the greatest underreported stories of the 20th century.
It was underreported because the people didn't talk about it.
Any of you who have had this in your background know that the people didn't talk about it.
My own mother was probably the toughest interview of all.
She was saying, you know, she was saying, Well, why do you want to go about that?
That's in the past.
That's in the past.
That's in the past.
Let's let that go.
In fact, she, you know, many people changed their name.
My mother added an E to her name, it's Ruby.
She added an E to it to change her name.
There's someone in the book who changes his name, people changed their name, they didn't look back.
In some ways, when they arrived here, it was like they had a new birthday.
Nothing that they had been through in the past had even happened.
They were starting anew, and they didn't want to think about it.
They also wanted to protect the children from whatever it is that they had gone through.
They many people have carried this to their grave and never told what happened.
Ultimately, it was just too painful.
It was much too painful.
There was a great deal of shame uh associated with what they had gone through, and why?
Why should they feel ashamed of what they endured?
The goal of this is to turn that paradigm around and to say that what they went through, we should be, we should be joyous that they survived at all.
We should, we should we should express gratitude.
I'm I'm personally feel filled with a sense of both sadness that they had to endure it, but a sense of gratitude that they had the fortitude in order to live through those times.
And this is a this is an effort to try to embrace that and learn something from what they had endured.
Learn something so that all that they endured does not go in vain, so that we can exact in fact gain strength from the strength that it took them in order to survive it.
That's the goal of all of this.
Now, in order to go out and uh write about this uh this huge phenomenon, as I told you, I went all over the country.
I came here and I uh interviewed so many people, interviewed over 1,200 people.
And what that meant was I had I ate well.
Let me say this.
I ate very well.
I ate very well.
And actually, you know, I I like to say that it was an experience of doing that.
So let me give you a little sense of what this migration has meant for people.
The South is huge.
Each state that the people came from is distinct from the other states.
It's not just one monolith.
So people who are from Texas came from a very different culture than people who are from Virginia, which is totally different from Alabama, which is totally different from Florida, which has very little, it seems to do with Tennessee.
I mean, all of these states are very different.
And when they left, they transferred their culture with them.
And we, in some ways, are the bearers of that culture in the same way that when you go to certain parts of uh the lower east side of Manhattan, or you go to certain parts of Chicago and you find that there's a little Italy, or you find that there's a Ukrainian village in Chicago, and that in Minnesota, there are a lot of people from Scandinavia.
Well, the same thing goes for this migration.
It was not a haphazard unfurling of lost souls.
People made made individual, well thought out, planned decisions as to where they were going to go based on the bus routes, the train lines, and the already uh well uh well-trod road that had been developed for them from where they were from.
And that is the reason why.
I'll just ask here how many of you have forebears or had people from people from uh Louisiana or Texas?
Yeah, Mississippi, Arkansas, yeah.
But you see, the over all the hands most of the hands go up for Texas and Louisiana, because that was the route that was taken to get out of Texas, and Louisiana primarily was to come to California.
So they're they're all over California.
The people who really wanted to get away went to Seattle.
They're stupid.
One of my mother's cousins went there from Rome to Seattle, she really wanted to get out.
When you're looking at uh the Midwest, though, you're looking at people who went from Mississippi, Alabama, uh, Tennessee, and uh Arkansas often to Chicago, Detroit, Cleveland, Minneapolis, the entire Midwest, and then the migration stream that that I my family was part of took people from Florida, Georgia, the Carolinas up to Washington, D.C., Detroit, uh, Washington, DC, to uh Philadelphia, New York, and Boston.
So those were the routes.
Those roots are beautifully defined.
It means that the people were not just just scattered to the wind.
They were thinking about what they were going to do.
They were planning, they did a great deal of work.
There are many telegrams that went back and forth, letters back and forth, letters of the Chicago to the Chicago defender, letters to a great aunt or a minister's son who was up in the north or out here in the west.
A great deal of planning went into this.
And that is also one of the myths that that had often prevailed that they just people just landed here out of nowhere.
That was not the case.
You don't just land in California by accident.
You have to think about it.
You have to really think about that.
Um, and so the process of going out and doing the search for the people and doing the reporting for this book was quite interesting because I was running into the very manifestation of the differences between these migration streams.
Beautiful differences.
Meaning the people had many and mostly left for the same reason, but the roots meant that a different culture uh sprang out of the migration stream that I might have been visiting.
So uh I'll tell you a little bit about the three things that I ran into that were quite interesting.
One is that when I went to uh Chicago, when I was in Chicago, I found myself on a bus that had been chartered by some seniors who were going to be going to a floating casino, meaning they were going to gamble.
It was early in the month.
It was early in the month.
They met at a, they always gathered at a uh parking lot outside a jewel food store at 87th and the Dan Ryan.
Anyone from Chicago knows where that is.
Yeah, see if you hands.
And it was always early in the morning, it'd be lots of buses, and it was just a question of where they were going.
Got on the right bus.
And as soon as I got on the bus, there was a commotion actually, because someone had brought a cooler which contained a delicacy from the old country.
A delicacy from the old country, and everyone was in an uproar when they found out it was on the bus.
Now, I had never heard of this delicacy, and I've I'm wondering how many people here have heard of it.
I will tell you what it is, but first I wanted to say that the people in the back were quite anxious to make sure there was enough left for them.
They said, make sure to save some for us.
They were very gracious, and they decided to offer the guest, meaning me, uh first piece of this delicacy.
I'd never heard of it.
It was called hoghead cheese.
How many of you have heard of hoghead cheese?
How many of you call it South Meat?
Okay, that's interesting.
That's a reflection of the migration stream right there because some people know it only as that.
How many of you actually had hoghead cheese?
Yes.
Notice, however, that there were fewer hands of people who had actually had it than had heard of it.
Interesting.
I had neither heard of it nor had it.
And so when they offered it to me, well, I have to say, my Georgia born mother never made it, and my Virginia born father never required it.
And so therefore I never had it, and I'd never heard of it.
And so when they broke it out, um, there was a great deal of excitement about it, but I I didn't know what I was going to do because I didn't really.
Look, all I knew was all I knew was it involved a hog and a hair.
And you know, neither one of those was working for me.
This was a worker for me.
And so I had to find a way to demure graciously.
And so what I did was I told them uh that about some, told them I had blood pressure, high blood pressure to worry about, which I did not, but which they accepted as a perfectly reasonable reason to uh forego the hoghead cheese.
And then they decided to set about uh carving out the hunks to spread out as you know it's in hunks, right?
And so that's how that was the experience there.
Uh now when I came to the West Coast, I found that it was not easy to necessarily make my way because it's very complicated, it's much more complicated here.
People are coming from Louisiana, there are multiple kinds of Louisiana, it's not just one Louisiana, there's Northern Louisiana, which is closer to more Delta.
There's Southern Louisiana, which is you've got uh New Orleans, you have all kinds of experiences here in Louisiana.
I spent so much time on every permutation that you could imagine.
I was Zydeco got exposed to that and never heard of that.
Zydeco.
Um I learned that, you know, the the spellings and and and pronunciations of many words, which I'm convinced are a way of exposing people who are not from there.
That's what I've convinced that a lot of things are.
We know you're not from there.
And I I had to work very hard to get in the good graces of people who uh recognize, well, where are your people from?
That was a question that I got a lot of.
And no one had heard of Rome, Georgia, so that didn't go very, that didn't help me very much.
But the people were very friendly and very gracious, and I managed to find that there were multiple clubs for and many of the groups.
There were Monroe, Louisiana Club.
There were there was Lake Charles, Louisiana Club, all kinds of Texas clubs for days because Texas is a country unto itself.
Yes, and I found my way in.
I had every permutation of red beans and rice with sugar and without.
There's a whole issue with that.
And you know, those are, you know, cooks might leave the kitchen over the issue of sugar in both greens and and red beans and rice.
And so I had all kinds of wonderful experiences just learning my way around.
I went to all kinds of Juneteenth parades.
I had a booth at a Juneteenth parade.
So I did all of this in order to learn the experiences of that.
But each migration stream is distinct, and I'm so proud of the experiences that I had here.
But when I went to New York, just to give a sense of how beautifully predictable each migration stream is.
When I went to New York, as big as New York is, I went to senior centers there, and at one of the senior centers there, I actually ran into not just people who had heard of Petersburg, Virginia, which is where my father's from, but they actually knew him.
They actually knew him.
That shows you how beautifully predictable this migration stream was.
And the migration exists and lives in all of us, even to this day, because there are connections in all of these places, and I'm so grateful for the people who invited me into their stream, even though I was from a different stream.
I'm so grateful to that.
Now, to tell you just a little bit about the three people in the book, those of you who may have read it, you know that it's about three people, narrowed down those 1,200 to three amazing and beautiful people, complicated people, not predictable people.
And each of them represent the three streams.
So one of them represents the stream up the East Coast.
He came from Florida and went to uh Harlem.
He had was leave basically fleeing for his life because he'd gotten on, he tried to earn a little bit more for the people he was working with in the groves.
He'd had a little bit of college, he was good with math, and you could see how the people were being cheated out of what they were supposed to be making.
The work was dangerous, they were having to climb these 40-foot trees, taking their lives in their own hands, and then they were being paid nickels for a box for fruit that would go and sell for four dollars a box.
They weren't asking for four dollars, they're just asking for a few more pennies more.
For doing that in the 1940s, uh he had to flee for his life because that was not acceptable for an African American in that caste system to do that.
That just was not, you just that was just not possible.
So he had to flee for his life.
Um he ended up becoming a railroad porter.
The second story was of a woman who had been a um uh sharecropper's wife in Mississippi, but she was terrible at picking cotton.
You know, that's not a good thing to be a sharecropper's wife, meaning that's your job, and you're terrible at it.
You know, you're just not good at it.
And you know, actually, that's a lesson too.
Just think of all the people who had to do this because that happens to be where they were born, they were born into a caste system.
But maybe they would have been better at um chemistry.
Perhaps they needed to be bookkeepers, maybe they would have been really wonderful um uh horticulturalists.
Who knows what they might have been, but they were they were consigned to a world in which all they could do was a particular thing.
In fact, in the state of South Carolina, it was against the law for a black person, uh, a black person had to actually get a license, go to and petition to do anything other than agricultural work.
That's how difficult and controlling this was.
That means someone who actually should have been an opera singer was gonna have to go and work in the fields because that was all that they could do.
So uh, so that was one of the people that was one of the things that she actually was not good at, and it was kind of refreshing to hear that, you know, actually I hadn't even thought about being good or bad at it, but there were people who actually were bad at it and actually felt bad about it.
Um but that wasn't why they left, they left because a cousin of her husband's had been beaten to within an inch of his life, and um her husband said to her after what he saw it happened to his cousin, this is the last co-op we're making, and they had to set about getting off the land of the uh of the planter, and they couldn't tell anybody.
This they uh she told me years later, she said, You didn't tell people you were gone until you were gone.
You couldn't let people know what you were doing, you couldn't trust anyone.
So she just told her mother and one of his trusted nephews, and that's how they got out.
And then finally, the trial the the the uh the migration to California was represented by a Dr.
Robert Joseph Pershing Foster, who was from Monroe, Louisiana, and I got a question earlier before arriving that I was gonna have to discuss how he came to make the decision, and I'm not saying I agreed with it.
I'm just saying this is decision he made to go to LA after having seen Oakland.
I did not make I didn't make the decision.
It was his decision.
I can't say I would agree with him.
I'm just saying this is a decision he made.
I love the Bay Area, I love the Bay Area, one of my favorite places ever to come.
And I will come here willingly, happily, any time because I love it.
Um, yes, um, but uh he made the decision because well, if you know him, if you read about him, you'll know he was a flamboyant surgeon who had uh performed in the army as a surgeon, but it turned out he couldn't practice surgery in his own hometown of Monroe, Louisiana, and so he set out on this journey to get to California.
He had to, it was a perilous journey that meant that he ended up having to drive for three states of the West without being able to stop because it turned out that Jim Crow had extended farther than he had anticipated.
He just did not realize that.
And it was a quiet kind of Jim Crow.
It wasn't in your face, there were no signs, it's just that no one would take him in for the night.
And he had to make that drive.
And I attempted I recreated that drive myself at my parents in the car, and um he had rented a buy he had driven a Buick, the Buick was uh he had a Buick Roadmaster in 1949.
He said if you'd seen it, you would have wanted it too.
That just tells you what he's like, and so uh I rented a Buick in his honor, and I was driving, and my parents were in the car, had them with me, and we came to the part of the road.
And how many of you made the drive through the mountains to get here?
Then you know, even now it's it's perilous and treacherous.
Imagine not being able to stop.
Imagine you have imagine having to take those hairpin curves at night through the mountains through the desert, no cars in the road.
Um, you know, the road is so mean that it's going north and south as much as west, and that's what we were going through.
And I began to get sleepy.
I began to veer from the road, and my parents got worried for us, and they actually said, You really need to stop the car.
You know, you really need to stop the car, stop the car.
And if you won't stop the car, let us out.
And they said, they said basically, you know, if you want to know about Jim Crow, we will tell you.
If this is a way to get us out, we'll tell you about it.
We'll talk.
So we stopped in Yuma, Arizona, where we had no trouble at all because it just shows you how far we've come.
We have a long, long way to go as a country, but we've come so far that we had no trouble at all.
It was a choice of which one, which which in uh did you want to stay in, Holiday Inn, Keita Inn, all the different ones.
Which one did you want to stay in?
And we had no trouble at all.
And that actually made me feel more empathy for him because it showed you that as tired as we were, uh, we had options that he didn't have.
He did not have the option in 1953, and that was not that long ago.
Not that long ago at all.
And um I I am tempted to read you something about him because I would love to, but I don't want to take up any more time.
I want to make sure I can answer your questions.
I want to close with a couple of things.
Um, oh, you want to.
All right.
All right, well, this is um Dr.
Robert Joseph Pershing Foster.
Um I'm just gonna say one other thing.
You know, I keep feeling the need to defend uh what he, his decision, even though I didn't make his decision.
Now, the thing is, he had a father-in-law who he was trying to also run from.
He was running from Jim Crow, he's running from the father-in-law.
Father-in-law was a very powerful man in Atlanta, he was president of Atlanta University, and he was a very uh uh powerful uh uh overwhelming figure.
And so uh before he left, before Robert Joseph Pershing Foster left for this drive, the father-in-law said, uh, you need to go to the Bay Area.
I love the Bay Area.
You will love the Bay Area.
Go to the Bay Area.
At that point, that pretty much sealed it for the Bay Area.
He was gonna choose something no matter what, as long as it wasn't what his father-in-law wanted.
But let me read this to you.
This is Los Angeles, 1996.
This is the day that I met Robert Joseph Pershing Foster.
The panel door rises a story high and would befit a museum or government office, but is actually the front door of a Spanish revival south of Wilshire.
The door opens, and there stands a one-time bourbon swilling army captain and deft-handed surgeon, who now in his later years is a regular at the blackjack tables and the trifectas at Santa Anita.
But he is at the heart of it all, and perhaps most important, a long-standing, still bitter and somewhat obsessive expatriate from the 20th century south.
The heartbreak Jim Crow land he chose to reject before it could reject him again.
He is a Californian now, this Robert Joseph Pershing Foster.
He is the color of strong coffee and has waves in his hair, which he lets grow his untamed as Einstein's, but then brushes back like the boys in the band.
He's wearing a white cotton island shirt, loose slacks, and sandals, the uniform of the well-to-do LA pensioner.
He has the build and bearing of a Sammy Davis Jr.
and not a little of a showmanship and delightful superficiality that seemed to grow on people in certain circles of LA.
That's LA, she says.
Now, you know, I've read that in LA, and I started to think, oh, I meant to edit that out.
But you know what?
They loved it.
They said, yep, we're superficial.
We're superficial.
Well, they loved it.
And you know it's right, don't you?
Yeah.
He walks straight back and slew footed into the foyer, past the curved faux gone with the wind staircase, and the East Asian pottery.
He gestures toward the living room and imposing ballroom of a space that dwarfs him in its volume, fairly frozen in the sea foam carpet and hot pink tulip chairs out of a Sherbety Doris Day movie from the 50s.
The whole effect is as starched and formal as the tuxedos he used to wear to the parties he threw for himself back when his wife Alice was alive and the money was raining down like confetti.
He seems accustomed to people fawning over the place, and with the prim air of leading men of his favorite movies from back in the 40s, he insists on serving his guests a slice of lemon pound cake and vanilla ice cream on Rosenthal China, whether they would like to have it or not, which I did not.
I'd already eaten.
He sat and watched.
He is a physician or was for most of his adult life, and by most accounts a very good one, and is prone to pontificate like a man of his years and accomplishments.
But he is just as likely to interrupt himself and check the time to see if he can still make the one o'clock at the Hollywood Park race track.
His photo albums are filled with an unlikely assortment of bookies and blues singers and dentists and fraternity men and surgeons and society people whose approval he craved even though he knew they were too pretentious to matter, really.
He doesn't say it because it would be gauge and hardly worth mentioning from his point of view, but there happened to be a lot of little Roberts around town due to the fact that over the years he delivered a number of baby boys whose mothers were so grateful for his firm hand and calming reassurances at the precise moment of truth that they named their sons not after their husbands, but after the doctor who had delivered their babies, before he begins his story, he tells you it's a long one and you can't get it all.
He's lived too many lives, done too much, known too many people, ridden so high and so low that there's no point in fooling yourself into thinking you can capture the whole of it.
You could try, of course, and he agrees to give as much as he can.
I love to talk, he says, a smile forming on a still chiseled face as he sits upright in his tulip chair, and I am my favorite subject.
I just want to close with these thoughts and before taking your questions.
And that is that this migration, you we've talked about the joys of of reporting it.
We've talked about the origins of it and how we all owe a debt of gratitude to the people who made it possible for us to be here.
In fact, many of us wouldn't be here if they hadn't left and met the people who would ultimately become our grandparents' parents or whatever.
But this migration has a lot of lessons for all of us today.
Remember, this migration was a leaderless revolution that changed the country.
That shows you the power of the individual.
One person multiplied by millions ended up putting so much pressure on the South that it forced the South to change.
And the ways that it forced the South to change was this.
One, it showed the South and also the North that the lowest caste people in this country had options, finally, and were willing to take them.
Wasn't sure, it wasn't clear whether they would take them or not.
This is the first time in American history that this low the lowest caste people, African Americans, took this huge step to leave the only place that they had ever been for most of their history and set out for courses at places unknown.
Secondly, it exposed the people who stayed to options, other ways of being.
In other words, they would come and visit their cousins and their great aunts and the neighbors who moved up north or out west, and they could see how the people are living.
And they could they wonder to themselves and said to themselves, why can't we have this back home?
Why can't we walk freely down the street without fearing that we might somehow offend and get on the wrong side of a caste system that is so hard to to figure out that we just basically shrink from everything?
Why can't we have that here?
And that helped to feed and fuel the uh what would ultimately be known as the civil rights movement.
The civil rights movement would have happened eventually, but it was it was accelerated by the mass departures of basically half of the black population from the South.
That's massive.
That's power of the individual.
And then finally, those people were sending money back home to help uh support the effort.
So there was all of this back and forth going on.
It took people in the North and the West and people in the South to make this happen.
Remember that whenever there's any kind of turmoil anywhere in the world, usually the United States gets more involved if there is already a contingent of people from that part of the world here in this country.
And that's because those people can put pressure on the United States to at least cover it and pay attention just by being there.
Not having to necessarily even protest, just by being there.
In other words, the North and the West having such a large percentage of black people that they'd never had before, had to take note of what was going on in the South.
They hadn't been paying attention before.
It should be remembered that resistance to this caste system, resistance to what is known as uh, whether you want to call it slavery, uh, the Jim Crow caste system, whatever you want to call it, resistance had been going on since 1619.
There had been resistance to this uh to the oppression that African Americans have been living under for the entire time was going on.
But these were people who were dying or attacked, lynched, but they were like trees that were falling and no one was hearing them.
Finally, there was when there was a large enough contingent of people in these big cities where all the media were, where the cameras were, suddenly people were taking notice, and it was then and only then that all of this these resistance efforts were getting attention, and that is what helped fuel the civil rights movement, what I like to consider the human rights movement forward.
And then finally, I wanted to say that what is the result of any migration experience?
What truly is a result of it?
People who migrate often don't do it for themselves.
It's almost too late for them sometimes because they've already suffered whatever the indignities are, the um the lowered uh experiences with education, the limits on their education.
Some could only go as far as the eighth grade.
That was as far as you could go in Chickasaw County, Mississippi, for example.
Others could only go as far as the 11th grade.
That was a standard for many, many uh people uh at that time.
They had already suffered the lack of nutrition, whatever it was, they had already suffered.
But it wasn't too late for the children and the unseen grandchildren and great-grandchildren, meaning us.
It wasn't too late.
So ultimately, when they made this decision to leave, it was not for them, but ultimately it was for us, all of us.
I mean, this is for I always say that this was not unlike any migration, the people who migrated across the Atlantic and Steerage, the people who crossed the Pacific Ocean, and those who crossed the Rio Grande.
Everyone who does such a thing is doing it for the unseen children and grandchildren who might benefit.
And what happened?
What happened to those people?
Those people, um, this was the first time that people in this lowest cast had an opportunity to become their truer selves.
And those children, once they got the opportunity, not all, not everybody in any group is going to go off and become Nobel laureate.
But this was the first time that you had an opportunity for Tony Morrison to exist the first time, and that is because during the time that her parents migrated from Alabama to Ohio.
Had they not migrated, she would not have been able to do something that we take for granted, and perhaps today we're not taking it as granted as much in this particular moment here in this building.
She would not have been able to go to a library and take out a library book.
It was against the law for African Americans to do that.
And if you're gonna become a Nobel laureate, you kind of need to be able to get a book now and then, and she would not have been able to do that had her parents stayed.
She would not have been able to do that.
When it comes to music, music as we know it would simply not exist.
Uh, much of the music as we know it.
Motown would not have existed at all.
That's because Barry Gordy migrated from George his parents migrated from Georgia to Detroit.
There when he got to be a grown man, he looked around him, he wanted to go into music.
He didn't have the money to go scouting out the best talent, so what did he do?
He ended up looking around himself, and there were these children, the children of the great migration, children who were listening to gospel music at home and spirituals at home and the blues music at home, and they were playing it out for themselves, and he saw these three girls.
Um, one of them was full of personality but didn't have the strongest voice.
I think you know I'm speaking about.
We would not even know her name, Diana Ross.
Her, and that's because her father migrated from West Virginia, mother from Alabama, met in Detroit.
She wouldn't even have existed had there been no great migration, much less to be, you know, to be discovered by Barry Gordy, who also wouldn't have existed, but you just keep going back and back and back, and you realize that this is an American story of so many people who wouldn't have existed, and we wouldn't even know their names had they not migrated out and taken this act of courage to leave.
He also heard about this very large family in Gary, Indiana.
Nine or ten kids, uh, five boys, the youngest one was the one who did all the dancing and singing.
We would not know Michael Jackson's name.
We would not know Prince's name.
All these people are individuals who were products of people who had migrated from different parts of the South to the North, met in the north, had the children, and the children had the opportunity to be exposed to and to be to be discovered.
The talent was within them all along, but it was latent and undeveloped because people were stuck in a caste system.
And when it comes to jazz, um, Miles Davis simply would not have been able to become the person that he did had there been no great migration.
His parents migrated from Arkansas to Illinois, where he had the opportunity to develop his skill, the luxury you might say.
Delonius Monk, his parents migrated from uh North Carolina to Harlem when he was five years old.
He too had the luxury of being able to spend time developing his his in his God-given talent instead of uh picking tobacco, which is what the family would have been doing in North Carolina, and John Coltrane.
John Coltrane.
He he migrated himself at the age of 17 from North Carolina to Philadelphia, where believe it or not, think about this historical uh fact, that is where when he got to Philadelphia, that is where he got his first Alto Sachs.
He had not touched an Alto Sachs until he got to Philadelphia.
And where would where would jazz be?
Where would music be?
Where would culture be?
And not just American culture, but world culture, all of these names I've given you just a few of the names.
This is just, this is just the tip of the iceberg.
I have a long list of recognized household names from August Wilson to Michelle Obama to James Baldwin and Richard Wright, all of these people who would never have been able to become the people that they had had someone not made the decision to leave, simply to leave.
The power of the individual decision could lead to so much that we now, in some ways, just it's so embedded in our culture that we don't often realize that this is actually the culture of a people who had left and made this big decision to leave.
Now, I want to end with uh with this quote from Richard Wright, because you know, we're we're in difficult times overall as a country, as a planet on so many levels, and yet, you know, the human story is one of which in which we truly have so much more in common than we've been led to believe, and we have so much more strength because it's embedded in our backgrounds.
We need to recalibrate what it means to be a hero.
Our young people need to recalibrate what it means to be a hero.
We have heroes in all of our backgrounds, all of our families.
We need to know the family story to realize how did we as individuals get to this point.
These people who made this sacrifice have left us in some ways the code, the answer to a lot of the questions that we might ever have.
They left us not through their words but by their actions as to what we should do even today.
We have the strength within us to overcome anything because these people had to overcome so much more than we can even fathom.
And these are people who we're we're talking about we're in a great recession.
These are people who were who survived the Great Depression, and this is not to compare it, you know, our expectations are different now, but the reality is these people had so little compared to what we have.
The poorest person has a cell phone.
It may be Metro PCS, but they have a cell phone.
They didn't have a cell phone.
And so they have left us, they have left us through their actions, and also in our our very, our very DNA, you might say, as as people who are descended from people, all people here in the United States for the most part, are descended from people who came a long way away just to get here.
That makes people different.
There's something different about people who make this leap of faith.
And so they have left us the answers.
And I want to leave with end with this quote from Richard Wright, where the title of the book comes from.
In some ways, it's a prayer.
It's what he said to himself as he was about to leave Mississippi for uh Chicago.
And it's a it's a lesson for all of us to, you know, whisper it to ourselves in moments of darkness where we're wondering what to do.
And he said, I was leaving the South to fling myself into the unknown.
I was taking a part of the South to transplant in alien soil, to see if it could grow differently, if it could drink of new and cool rains, bend strange winds, respond to the warmth of other suns, and perhaps to bloom.
They have left us the answers to almost any question we might have.
They may not even be here to tell us what it is, but they have by their actions.
And that means that if they could do what they did without cell phones, no Skype, no email.
Think about the moment of departure.
Think about the moment of departure for all of them, which is how we all got here ultimately.
There's a moment of departure in which all of our, somebody in all of our backgrounds had to look into the face and to the eyes, the teary eyes, truly, of the parent, the person who had raised them, the mother, the father, the grandmother, the grandfather, the aunt, whoever it might have been.
And they could not be assured that they would ever see this person alive again.
This is not, this is not an exaggeration.
This is the reality of life at the time that I'm talking about.
Remember, there was no email.
There was no Skype.
There was no, there were no cell phones, no reliable, even long distance cell, long distance telephone service.
So when they were leaving, if they were getting on a on a boat from uh from uh Europe to here, if they were getting on a train from Florida to Seattle, there was no guarantee that they would see this person alive again.
No guarantee.
And that person, that that older person who could not make the crossing, because this is a young person's thing, really.
They were too old to make the crossing.
They had lived their lives, and they had to look into the eye of that person that they had raised and wonder if they would live to see them a lot, see them again in their lifespan, and not know if they ever would.
Think about that.
Think about the sacrifice that they had to make at that moment the the heart wrenching moment of departure.
And when you think about what they had to do in order for us to be here today, you re you realize that if they could do what they did with absolutely nothing but just grit, fortitude, faith, and hope, and a belief in something that they could not even see, but believed had to be better than what they had there, then that means that there's nothing that we, the heirs to all that they did, cannot do.
So thank you so much for having me.
Thank you.
I've been told that we can take about 10 minutes for questions if there are any.
Yes.
Nowadays.
Yes, the question was do I travel to the South to deliver the message to talk about the book?
And yes, I do, and I've I was surprised that actually the very first place that I was invited to speak.
This is before the book came out was the University of Mississippi.
Yeah, and I I uh uh wondered at first at certain point to remind them, you know, the book is about the people who left.
This is about them now.
And they say, yes, we understand, we know that we want to hear about it.
And the reason is because actually the the uh I should say that the turnout, some of the best turnouts are in the South, and that's because these are their people.
These are their people.
These are their cousins, their uh their aunts, sometimes their grandparents, sometimes their parents.
These are their people, and so they feel a deep connection to this, a deep curiosity.
More, you know, I'm I've been really gratified to see that.
I love that.
Yes, I was at the University of Virginia, and um it was a great turnout, and um I was in that particular setting, I was the only person of color in the room, which is very which is which says a lot about the appreciation for history overall, um, and I was very I was gratified to see that as well.
So uh the and in some ways, this great migration, the people who were part of this migration, in some ways were unwitting ambassadors of southern culture because they brought the culture with them.
So Southerners, if they look at it and and really uh take note of what happened, then in some ways the way that they probably that I gather that it's being uh understood and appreciated is that these are our people who went to the north and the west and carried the culture with them so that in some ways we can take a part of that, we can we can take joy in it.
We've come a long, long way.
We really have come a long way, and the turnout has been phenomenal in the South.
It has been yes, my name is Malcolm Westbrooks, and my father JB and my mother Videlia migrated to Oakland 1937 from Jasper County, Texas, and he did it by freight train.
But uh I know how many for you a photo of them on the East Shore of Lake Mirror 1939, and some video.
I began uh videotaping my father in the late 70s, early 80s, and he has some wonderful stories that I think you'll enjoy.
So I'd be honored.
Oh, thank you.
Oh, thank you.
Hi there.
I am just absolutely so moved by this book.
I'm a I'm an avid fan of history and history of real people, and particularly of the migration coming to California.
My family settled in Arizona and up in the mountains of McNary and Tucson and Phoenix and Yuma and all of those places in the middle of the desert.
Yeah, it's and I mean it's a fascinating stories of how black folks got to be in the middle of the desert in the first place.
But one of the things I wanted to ask you was about the process.
I also work with senior citizens to get them to tell their stories about settling in places like Cochrane and those places like that in the cotton fields and fruit farms that are here in uh uh the Bay Area or in Northern California.
I was just wondering what kind of questions did you ask, and when you went through the interview process, and I know that this was a 15-year process, and old people do love to love to talk.
They love to give them an opportunity to tell their story and they're ready to tell it.
So I was just wondering what what kind of questions would you ask?
Well, when it comes to the 15 years, the 15 years was in segments.
The f you know, it was about two years of just interviewing the 1200, going all over the country and going into senior centers and uh ARP meetings and uh Baptist churches in uh in New York where everybody was from South Carolina and of course Catholic churches in LA where everybody was from Louisiana and on and on.
So there was a lot of places that I went.
That's one of the things that took the time.
Another thing that took the time is that uh people have to tell the story in their own time.
And for many of the people, remember, many of them don't want to talk, have not wanted to talk.
Um my mother was, as I said, one of the toughest interviews I had was my mother, um, who I am convinced still has not told me everything.
Um, but uh one of the things that I did with her, for example, was I I actually read every word of the book to her.
My father um passed away and did not live to see the day.
He would have been so proud to have seen this book.
Um, but I did read it to her, who was then widowed, and um, and what happened was I would read it, and she would start uh interrupting.
I mean, I couldn't get through a page because she said, Well, in Rome, you know, there goes Rome again.
And so that was one way to get her to talk.
So, one of the challenges is just to make it comfortable for people to talk because a lot of times they don't want to talk.
It's too painful.
When you describe these things, and we we talk about the absurdity of not being able to pass somebody on the road or that sort of thing.
But this was their lives.
This is what they had to live with for uh until uh they made the passage uh out of the South.
And it was it was uh it it scarred them, and I think that a lot of this is almost like post-traumatic stress.
So it takes a lot of time and patience, which is one reason why it wouldn't be just one interview, it would be many, many, many visits.
I would call them more visits than interviewing, and we would just talk about whatever they was on their minds at that moment.
I might throw out a topic about you know, tell me about you know when you got married or how you met your spouse, how'd you meet your husband, and then they would start talking, and then we would ease into it, and then over time um other things would come out, and that's how I got the story.
There's a hand right there, right here.
Hi, oh, hi.
You actually uh answered uh the part of my question regarding uh getting those stories.
So I wanted to take a quick second to announce an event I'm doing.
I'm inspired by your book.
Uh, my boss, Alameda County Supervisor Keith Carson initiated a program where the last um three months we've been doing genealogy with youth in uh South Berkeley, uh West Oakland, and uh former foster youth.
So uh those uh young people will be uh telling their stories on June 4th at Malcolm X Elementary in uh Berkeley.
So I hope you all will come out and uh support those young people telling their stories, and uh for the record, my family, my mother's side, Appaloosis, Louisiana, and uh Jacksonville, Florida, my father's side by way of Detroit.
I I I have to say that you know, when I started this, people didn't talk like that.
And my goal was to have almost when you introduce yourself to describe what the background is because that is part of the identity, and it's embracing that identity and taking a sense of dignity from what that represents.
That means something, it means something.
Just saying where they're from means they had to come a long way.
That's the story in itself.
There's more to the story, but that says so much, and I I it just it just warms my heart to hear uh that we are embracing it and talking about that in that way.
Yes, um, the question is about the migration from Gorye Island.
I have I have uh I have her obviously heard of at the door of no return, and um one of the things that I have uh come to to embrace with this book.
If you read it, you get a sense of it.
If you heard me speak, you get a sense of it, and I'll say it again.
We all have so much more in common than we've been led to believe.
We are all here because someone made a great leap of faith to jump off a cliff into the unknown.
I view all these migration streams as being reflective of the faith and the fortitude of the forebears who did this thing, and I don't see a difference between whether people came from the Caribbean or whether they came from Alabama.
Um the idea is they all we all came through uh great uh sacrifice and loss and homesickness and all of that, bringing the culture with us, having to recreate the culture wherever we landed, and it's that idea that I uh connect with.
The people in this book are merely proxies for what anyone whoever made the crossing has done.
The beauty of it is it gives us an idea because many for many people the the uh actual migration experience or immigration experience happened a long time ago.
This is so recent and yet it's complete that you get a chance to understand what was it like?
What did it take?
What would I have done?
I wanted it to come alive for readers.
These these people, these people are human beings doing what human beings do when they're faced with the circumstances that they were in, and that's where I take my sustenance from.
And it makes me feel a greater connection to all of humanity because it this to be human in some ways is to migrate ultimately.
Yes.
Yes.
Um, that's so resonant about the experience of reading your book is you are the reader, and communities across the country are inspired by the political women.
What you written.
I'd like to know what's your next project.
And also in your various meetings across the country, what things have jumped off because of people reading the book, the conversations being had because of the book.
What have one of those inspirational things that you see?
Because it's it's certainly there's a wave that your book has generated.
There is.
Well, first of all, this is the book.
This is my book.
This is my version of the book.
This has been with me since September when the book came out.
I had no idea that it was going to that I would still be talking about the book to this degree at this point, eight months into it.
And it doesn't appear to be uh coming to coming to an end because I'm booked through uh spring of 2013.
I cannot believe that.
So, so um when I I say that to say that the uh that it's become in some ways a uh a touch point for many groups to identify with there's a great discussion about immigration in this country.
It helps understand why people do a particular thing.
I would hope that it would help us to recognize the common humanity and all of us.
My name is I would hope that it would help people who are recent immigrants and uh see African American, the African American experience is not as different from theirs as they might perceive it to be, and that for other Americans to also see that that African Americans ended up doing, forced ultimately to do what other groups have uh chose to do.
And so there's so much commonality we have.
One of the things that I do know that it's being um taken up by many, many schools.
Um there are it is crossed the ocean and is being uh read by uh very high level people in Europe who are looking at their own immigration situation with people with all the turmoil in North Africa coming into Europe.
So believe it or not, that's what's going on there.
Uh and I don't we don't know all where it will go because people are still reading it.
I mean, it's a great leap of faith just to pick up the book because it's a big book, you know, and uh but I I hope you find that it is um uh a pleasure to read because I worked really hard to try to make it that.
These people are beautiful people, yeah.
It is.
Thank you so much.
And I think we can do a lot with our children if we talk to them about the situations in which we came from.
Because with my daughter and son, I said, Do you know why you like potato pie?
No, I just know it's good.
I said, Well, because blacks in the South, years ago, they didn't have money for desserts, so therefore they used whatever they had that they had grown and put sugar in it and made it to be what they wanted.
I said that's where you got your potato pie.
That's where you got your bread pudding, that's where you got your rice pudding, and all of those reserves, each cobbler, and all of that was from down south because my parents did not have money to buy sweets, so they made it themselves.
And just one other comment I can um I can um go back because it's very emotional for me, because when you were talking about people trying to act white, my English teacher at Grambling was very light, fair skin, and she had her hair red.
She always colored it red for some reason, and she was very stiff, you know.
She's just very educated.
She was on her way to Grambling to work one morning, and a group of white people forced her off the road between um Grammick and Rustin and beat her up because they told her she was trying to act white.
So it was very emotional when you said that, because I pretty much have lived through a lot of.
It was life and death.
This is real the reality.
And you knew your place back there.
Yeah.
And that's why I didn't appreciate BB King.
Because we used to speak off and go to the game.
Yeah, I wanted to uh I wanted to thank you so much for uh, okay.
Yeah, right.
I wanted to thank you so much for your book.
I migrated to California in 19 uh 51 when I was just 20 years old, and uh last week I got a chance to share my migration story with fourth graders, and they were very much uh very much uh interested in it.
Uh also there's hope after all.
Uh yes, yes, of course.
They were very, very much interested in it with pictures of my family and so forth.
But I wanted to say also that I had the opportunity to connect my migration story and your story with the migration of one of my great grandmothers who came over uh and lived as an enslaved person, and I knew her when I was a young child.
She died in 1939 when I was nine years old.
And so they got a chance to see a larger picture uh of the migration.
But thank you very much.
Well, thank you.
I think we have time for one more question.
You had started out earlier uh talking about how you make this story alive to young people, and I'd like for you to share that with us because I really would like to know because I know we talk to our kids and our grandchildren, but I like to hear how you share it and make it alive.
Well, the the uh well, one of them is to come up with these things that will that are connected to their lives, and one of them is driving is a big deal, you know, especially for for uh people who feel that no one can tell them how to drive.
Uh, and so that I I I've looked for examples such as that.
Um, but I'm I'm struck by the uh a study that I uh came across uh after having completed the book that reminded me of even why I decided to do the book, and that was a study that showed that it was it was uh in North Carolina as I'm recalling, one of the Carolinas, of uh it happened to have been uh Mexican American children, and they showed that the uh the self-esteem for the children rose when there was a discussion of actually their culture and their background.
In other words, once they embraced their culture and their background, recognizing that they were American, but they also had other parts of themselves that could strengthen them in some way, and their self-esteem measurements of self-esteem actually rose.
Now, the thing is that for many African American children, that may not be occurring because the assumption is well they're American and you know they know the story already.
Well, actually, they don't know the story.
There's no way you could truly know the story.
Uh, and I it reminded me of why I decided to do the book to begin with.
The idea, you know, going way back, I'm thinking about how when I was in school, my mother got me in the best school that she could because she valued education, the people actually truly valued education because it had been denied them.
And so she got me in a diverse school, a very good school in Washington, DC, with many, many people from all over the world.
And so there are many of them were diplomats, children, or anyway, they were a lot of so-called immigrants.
And I found myself identifying with the immigrant children.
I found myself feeling that you know we'd open up our um lunch boxes and our lunch boxes were different from the other children.
Other children might have grilled cheese sandwiches.
Well, my mother made um every single day.
She had Vienna sausages on Wonder Bread with Miracle Whip.
Yeah, and she actually pronounced it, it was not pronounced Vienna sausage, they were pronounced Vina sausage.
Yes.
So every day I would open it up, and there was the same thing.
It was Vienna sausages on Wonder Bread with Miracle Whip every single day.
She was, and she was doing this was her understanding her translation of what she thought northerners would be eating.
This was an upgrade in her mind, and so um I identified with the horror of opening this up and seeing what it was, and then I had immigrant friends who were opening up things that might be curried or something else or very spicy with some things that other children were not having.
And so I identified with that, but I didn't realize why.
And that is because we had a similar experience of being newcomers, the children of newcomers in a new world.
And so that's how I became, you know, going, obviously, at the time I didn't recognize that I was gonna go and write a book.
But to answer your question, I didn't realize on certain days where people would start talking about how their grandparents or great-grandparents had come from the old country and done this and done that and made something of themselves.
I didn't realize that the same could be said for people who had done what my parents had done.
I didn't realize that.
I didn't realize I would be quiet on those days and not know what to say, and I didn't realize that we had stories to tell too.
So thank you very much.
From New York, this is Democracy Now.
OHCHR has just a few minutes ago reported on a multitude of reports of salary executions of unarmed men and civilians in Al-Fasha.
The United Nations is repeating its call for an immediate ceasefire in Sudan after the UAE backed rapid support forces seized control of Al Fasha and Darfur after a seventeen-month siege.
Mass reports of atrocities in the city.
We'll get the latest.
Then the U.S.
government shutdown has entered its twenty-eighth day.
Almost a million and a half federal workers are going without pay.
Many are turning to food pantries to eat, as forty-two million people will soon lose food assistance through the SNAP program.
Millions are also facing soaring health care premiums as Republicans refuse to extend subsidies for the Affordable Care Act.
Some parts of Jamaica could see up to 40 inches of rain.
More rain than typically falls in an entire year.
We have nothing in our hands to live on.
If a hurricane hits, we're screwed.
If the hurricane comes on top of all the problems we already have, we'll simply die.
My kids, my wife, and my family are somewhere else.
We have nothing to eat to survive.
This adds to the problem of bandits shooting all day.
There's no way out except to die.
The hurricane exploded in strength from a prop tropical storm on Saturday to a category four hurricane on Sunday, a rapid intensification made possible by abnormally warm waters in the Caribbean.
Climate scientists say human activities causing oceans to warm dramatically, making rapidly developing storms more common.
The United Nations top officials says the world has failed to limit global heating to 1.5 degrees Celsius or 2.7 degrees Fahrenheit, the goal set by the Paris climate agreement to prevent the most devastating consequences of the climate crisis.
Speaking with the Guardian and the Brazilian news outlet, Suma Uma, ahead of next month's COP 30 climate summit in Brazil, U.N.
Secretary General Antonio Guterres said it's now inevitable.
Humanity will overshoot the 1.5 degree target set by the Paris climate agreement with devastating consequences for the world.
So overshooting is now inevitable.
And so it is absolutely indispensable to change course in order to make sure that that overshooting is as small as possible, and this is a basic condition to avoid tipping points.
We don't want to see the Amazon as a savannah.
But that is a real risk if we don't change course and if we don't take a dramatic decrease of emissions as soon as possible.
Democracy now will be in Belem, Brazil, covering the UN climate summit.
In the Gaza Strip aid organizations warn the amount of food and other basic goods Israel's allowed to enter the Palestinian territory continues to fall far short of the 600 truckloads per day promised under Israel's ceasefire agreement.
The UN says the daily number of trucks allowed into Gaza has never passed 200 on any single day in October.
Meanwhile, thousands of Palestinians are returning to neighborhoods.
Israel forced them to evacuate only to find their homes in rubble, according to the UN migration agency, an estimated 90% of all buildings in Gaza are destroyed or damaged.
This is a Mal Taleb Alian, a Palestinian from the Al-Shahti refugee camp whose home was flattened by Israeli strikes.
We took the house keys.
Here they are, the house keys.
We took them so we would come back and find the house.
But when the truce happened, we returned and we didn't find the house.
We didn't even find the door.
Every day when I come here, I feel like my soul leaves me.
This is where I used to go, where I used to walk.
This is my place, my home, my house.
Here I built my life.
Here I built dreams for me and the children.
It's very hard to lose your home.
In the occupied West Bank, Israeli forces killed three Palestinian fighters during an early morning raid on a village near the city of Janin.
The raids sparked heavy exchanges of gunfire, prompting Israel's military to call an air strikes.
This comes as the Israeli defense minister, Israel Katz, is pledging his forces will remain in Palestinian refugee camps in the northern West Bank until at least the end of the year.
Israeli attacks on the West Bank have killed more than a thousand Palestinians over the past two years, including two hundred and thirteen children.
U.S.
officials who closely examine the 2022 shooting death of Palestinian American journalist Sharina Abuakla and the occupied West Bank were deeply divided over the Biden administration's public conclusions, with some officials convinced her killing was intentional.
That's according to the New York Times, citing five current and former U.S.
officials who worked on the case, including a career military policeman with 30 years experience.
Speaking publicly for the first time, Colonel Steve Gabavic said the U.S.
government had soft pedaled the office's findings to appease the Israeli government.
He said he and his colleagues were left flabbergasted by the Biden State Department statement attributing Abu Akla's killing to quote tragic circumstances.
The Colonel also spoke with journalist Medi Hassan of the news outlets at Teo.
My findings were beyond a reasonable doubt that this was an intentional killing of Srinabacla.
This is on the 19th or 20th of May 2022.
Yes.
This is within 10 days, yes, of her killing.
Yes.
You, on behalf of the United States government, are saying that beyond reasonable doubt, that's a legal standard and a criminal call.
Yes, it is.
She was intentionally killed, correct.
Venezuelan officials say they've captured a group of mercenaries tied to the U.S.
Central Intelligence Agency.
In a statement, the government of Venezuela said, quote, this is a colonial operation of military aggression that seeks to turn the Caribbean into a space for lethal violence and U.S.
imperial domination, unquote.
Earlier this month, President Trump acknowledged he authorized the CIA to secretly conduct operations in Venezuela.
On Sunday, a U.S.
warship arrived in Trinidad and Tobago, leading Venezuela to cancel energy agreements with the Caribbean nation.
Here's Venezuela's vice president and oil minister Delcy Rodriguez.
It's not a conflict, it's aggression from the United States, a militaristic aggression against Venezuela.
President Maduro has said it.
It's about Venezuela's oil and gas.
The U.S.
federal government shutdown has entered its 28th day.
On Monday, American Federation of Government Employees, the nation's top federal workers' union, called on Congress to immediately end the shutdown by passing a spending bill that does not include the health care measures that Democrats want to protect.
Everett Kelly, the President of the American Federation of Government Employees, said in a statement, quote, It's time to pass a clean continuing resolution and end this shutdown today.
No half-measures and no gamesmanship, he said.
This comes as the Department of Agriculture posted a notice on its website stating no federal food aid will go out November 1st.
Meanwhile, President Trump has stated he will not tap into a contingency fund of five billion dollars to keep SNAP, that's the supplemental nutrition assistance program running.
One in eight Americans rely on SNAP food assistance.
Indiana's Republican governor called for a special legislative session Monday to redraw the state's congressional map, stating if Indiana doesn't take action, quote, we'll have consequences of not working with the Trump administration as tightly as we should.
Unquote.
The proposal could allow Republicans to win all nine of Indiana's congressional seats that follows similar efforts by Republicans to successfully redraw maps in their favor in Missouri, North Carolina, and Texas.
Earlier this month, the Trump administration appointed Kurt Olson, a former Trump campaign lawyer, as a special government employee to work on election issues.
Speaking to the Wall Street Journal, officials said Olson has started asking intelligence agencies about information related to the 2020 election.
This comes as the Trump administration's instructed the Justice Department to send observers to New Jersey and California to monitor polling sites during elections next week.
Californians are set to vote on a ballot proposition that would redraw the state's congressional districts, allowing Democrats to possibly pick up five additional seats in Congress.
Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom called the Trump administration's moves as intimidation tactic.
While California's Attorney General Rob Bante said, quote, all indications, all arrows, show this is a tee up for something more dangerous in the 2026 midterms and beyond.
President Trump met Japan's newly elected ultranationalist prime minister, Sinaya Takaichi in Tokyo Tuesday as he continued a six-day trip to Asia.
The pair agreed to cooperate on expanding the supply chain for rare earth metals and promised to expand military cooperation with Takeichi, reiterating a pledge to increase Japan's military spending to at least two percent of gross domestic product.
During their summit, she repeatedly flattered Trump, saying she plans to nominate him for a Nobel Peace Prize.
In such a short period of time, the world has become more peaceful.
Earlier today, Japan's first female prime minister joined President Trump aboard an aircraft carrier at a U.S.
naval base in Yokosuka, where Trump told active duty soldiers he plans to keep using the National Guard to occupy American cities and that he might deploy soldiers from other military branches as well.
This comes ahead of Trump's trip to a summit in South Korea, where he'll meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping on Thursday.
It's unclear if he will also be meeting with the North Korean leader on this trip.
In Cameroon, the world's oldest president, 92-year-old Paul Bia, was re-elected Monday to an eighth term in office.
This follows days of protest during which security forces killed four people.
Cameroon's top court ruled via one the majority of the votes, but the opposition contested the result.
Recently, dozens of opposition supporters and activists and leaders had been arrested.
And in the Ivory Coast, 83-year-old incumbent president Alessand Watara has won a fourth term in office after an election that saw two of his main rivals disqualified.
About half of eligible voters cast ballots, far fewer than the roughly 80% who voted in the 2010-11 elections when Wattara was first elected.
And those are some of the headlines.
This is Democracy Now, Democracy Now.org, the War and Peace Report.
I'm Amy Goodman in New York, joined by Juan Gonzalez in Chicago.
Hi, Juan.
Hi, Amy, and welcome to all of our listeners and viewers across the country and around the world.
The United Nations is repeating its call for an immediate ceasefire in Sudan after the UAE backed rapid support forces seize control of the city of Al-Fasher in Darfur after a 17-month siege.
On Monday, the head of the African Union called for the opening of humanitarian corridors to allow life-saving aid to reach those in need.
The African Union also condemned reports of war crimes in Al Fasher.
One group allied with the Sudanese military has claimed the RSF has, quote, executed more than 2,000 unarmed civilians, unquote, since taking control of Al Fasher.
The fall of the city is seen as a major blow to the Sudanese military.
On Monday, Sudan's Army Chief, General Abdelfata Obaran announced the withdrawal of a soldiers from their last stronghold in Darfur.
Everyone has followed what has happened in Al Fazir.
Certainly the leadership there, including security, made assessments that they have to leave the city due to the systemic destruction.
And killing of civilians.
We agreed with them to leave the city and to go to a safe place so as to spare the rest of the citizens and the rest of the city from destruction.
On Monday, the UN humanitarian coordinator in Sudan, Denise Brown, warned of the escalating humanitarian crisis in Al Fasher and throughout Sudan.
A blockade of humanitarian assistance going in for those civilians.
So I just want to reiterate there are civilians in El Fashar.
It is a fact.
And once again, and we've said it dozens of times, the U.N.
calls on the RSF to allow safe passage for them for them to leave, particularly as the fighting has intensified over the past 24 hours.
These individuals are increased risk of being injured or killed.
OHCHR has just a few minutes ago reported on a multitude of reports of summary executions of unarmed men and civilians in Al-Fashar.
The Sudanese military and the UAE backed RSF have been fighting since 2023.
Since then, more than 150,000 people have died across Sudan.
About 12 million have fled their homes.
We go now to Marine Al Neal, a Sudanese activist, usually uh joins us uh from Khartoum uh or in Sudan, but is now in Nairobi, Kenya.
Marine, can you talk about the significance of the RSF taking over Al-Fasher, the role of the UAE, and the level of famine in the city, what it means for the whole country.
The the most important aspect of uh the RSF taking control of Al-Fash is the humanitarian aspects.
We've seen uh the situation in Al-Facet in the months of the siege, which were about 80 months of siege, and uh during that time, the RSF built barricades from sand that just completely surrounded the city, uh, making sure that no one goes in or out except through one um what they called a safe um corridor.
Um, and it was anything but safe.
Um people were facing multiple violations uh through that route.
And during the time of the siege, we've seen the level of fa uh famine in in uh Al-Fashed provided to something we've not seen in other areas in Sudan.
Even just a sack of millet, which is the staple or was the staple in Al-Fashid, rose to over a thousand dollars.
And people started basically depending on animal feeding to feed themselves and their families.
And that has been the situation for months.
So now with the RSF uh taking over the city and and uh entering um the city and taking over the sixth infantry of the Sudanese armed forces, uh the biggest fear is what's going to happen to the civilians.
We know that there the RSF does not uh differentiate between military and and civilians, and they they've been explicitly saying there are no civilians in Al-Fashed, which is uh not um the reality.
Um so this is the fear now what's going to happen to the civilians, and we're already seeing um great violations uh happening to the people, executions, uh detentions, uh targeting of um volunteers, um targeting of journalists.
We've seen the detention of the general journalists as well.
And when it comes to um what does this mean for uh the war in Sudan and in total, um this just shows us that what the Sudanese armed forces have been promising, which is um military victory uh that is going to end the war, is nowhere near happening.
Um and if they keep insisting that they must win with a military victory, then this is just going to prolong the war uh more and more and causing more civilians uh harm because both parties are um indiscriminately um attacking uh without whether these are civilians or or from the other uh war in party.
Um and also indiscriminately attacking infrastructure.
Um they've attacked uh healthcare infrastructure.
About 80% of the hospitals are out of service now and um and let alone all the medical staff that have also fled the country.
Um so we're seeing with um the the harms that the war is causing, we're also seeing the healthcare situation deteriorating very quickly, and this is something that is impacting um places like uh North Darfur very heavily and also impacting uh the rest of the country.
Could you talk uh Maureen about the significance of the city of Al Fasher?
Uh uh to the both sides, why they have fought so hard now for so long uh over control of the city.
Yeah, well, it is the last uh stronghold of the Sudanese armed forces in uh that four.
Um, and this is one of the fears that is um uh also a lot of Sudanese people are are afraid of facing, or afraid that the country will face now is um the prospect of having uh basically two governments because already the RSF have um announced um a parallel government um and now with them taking uh uh control of Al-Fashid and also taking control of about two days ago of Bada, which is um another strategic city in uh North Korea.
Um, so the fear of having two governments uh now uh which will lead to longer destabilization that could um uh not being able to end it, whether military or or through the negotiations, um, since uh SAF was is not um is not accepting any negotiations at the time.
There are no negotiations happening directly or indirectly.
Um so with the RSF taking control uh of Al-Fashed, this fear is growing about having the country destabilized for longer, about having uh two governments um and and also the fear of um the back and forth of RSF taking control and SAF taking control of uh areas which causes more and more violations.
Um every time you have this movement of the two warring parties, um, we you see a spike in in in human humanitarian violations.
You see a spike in gender-based violence and sexual violence, um, and you see obviously a spike in detention and in executions, extra judicial executions that are being done by both parties um uh accusing um civilians or maybe not civilians, we don't know, because there are no trials happening, accusing them of collaborating with the other party and um executing them extrajudicially based on that.
Could you talk about the role of outside powers in this war of specifically the United Arab Emirates or other regional powers?
What do they have to gain from continuing to stoke this war?
Well, the United Arab Emirates is playing multiple roles in this uh war.
We know that it has been backing the rapid support forces, and on the other hand, it still has um relations with the government that is um the Sudanese armed forces.
Um and we've seen how big of a role it plays on the other side as well, uh, especially recently when the uh air flights between uh Port Sudan and UAE were stopped, and we've seen that the uh amount of um gold imports that have been halted uh due to that.
So the uh UAE has a vested interest um in Sudan, uh, has been supporting the rapid support uh uh forces, and at the same time it is continuing to have relations with the Sudanese armed forces.
Um so I think that the lack of stability um does facilitate uh more um uh uh importing of uh gold from Sudan that is not being regulated.
Um uh and at the same time they're still uh also uh importing the the legally uh uh gold from Sudan.
And at the same time it's part the UAE is part of uh the quad that is um trying to lead negotiations between the two uh uh warring parties, um, and the existence of UAE in that quad has been one of the reasons that's being stated by the Sunese armed forces as um a reason that they cannot trust the Quad to lead these uh negotiations.
So we know that the United Arab Emirates can have a lot of uh impact.
Uh it can uh control um or at least impact the flow of uh weapons and ammunition to the rapid support forces.
It can also uh pressure the Sudanese armed forces through their uh economic relationship.
Um and it can um also uh impact both parties uh through its uh contribution in the quad.
Uh so they they're able to influence the situation to something better if that was their priority, but um we know very well that the priority is uh the economic um gains that they have from Sudan.
So finally, Marine Al Neil, um what do you feel um can be done at this point?
What is civil society calling for?
Talk about what the UN, and we're speaking to you from the United States, what the United States can do.
What does civil society want?
At this moment, what's important, we have an urgent situation uh that is happening now in Al-Fash.
So there is a need for urgent help.
There is a need for for um having that the aid reach the people.
We've had over a thousand families uh fleeing al-Fashid and reaching uh Tawila and nearby uh town.
Um and all of these people are in need of are in desperate need of uh humanitarian assistance.
Um that needs to be organized.
There are um groups that are working on the ground, um, there are community-based groups, uh, there are grassroots groups that are working on the ground, and that can be supported.
Um and when we're talking on the other hand, what what can be done from the United States uh uh I think um, I mean the United States is also part of uh the quad.
So um uh people in the United States can um work on um uh influencing the United States by prioritizing um the safety of the people and the livelihoods of the people.
Um we've heard the special envoy of the US say that uh their main concern, this was before the takeover of Al-Fashid.
Their main concern is that is uh the relations between the Sunni's armed forces and uh Islamic movements, and I think it's important to move uh the main concern from any uh power sharing uh prospects to what is happening to the people now on the ground, especially when we have such a dire situation.
Um, and another area that can be uh also very impossible is uh to see some seriousness in the the um measures that the US is taking.
We've seen them um impose sanctions on uh a number of rapid support forces leaders, uh while at the same time there are reports of um rapid support forces leaders um roaming freedom in uh Washington DC, actually.
Um, so there is a question of uh how serious are these uh uh measures that are are being taken uh against the perpetrators to try to um pressure uh to pressure them to uh prioritize that humanitarian situation right now and and pressure them into at least a humanitarian ceasefire ceasefire, like the pod has uh suggested for three months uh um uh there can be more seriousness taken into these uh uh measures.
Um, so we can see uh the warring parties um uh prioritizing also the safety of the Sudanese people because um at this moment, and as we've seen for two years, um the priority of both warring parties was um reaching power basically um uh while the international atches priorities have been related to um economic uh interests um as well as interest in not destabilizing uh the entire region.
Maureen Al Neon wanna thank you for being with us, Sudanese activists joining us from Nairobi, Kenya.
Coming up, the government shutdown enters its 28th day.
42 million Americans will soon lose federal food assistant.
We'll look at why millions are seeing soaring health care premiums and what can be done about it.
Stay with us.
Tomorrow is coming.
Some new hope is around then, and it's beaming through the land.
I could be all right under the door with the holy line, things have gonna be alright.
This is Democracy Now, Democracy Now.org.
I'm Amy Goodman with Juan Gonzalez.
The U.S.
federal government shutdown is entered its 20th day.
On Friday, more than a million 1.4 million federal workers miss their first full paychecks.
Um this is furloughed federal worker, Anthony Spade in line at a food bank in Washington, DC.
So today is my normally I would get paid today.
Um, I don't have no paycheck in my account.
I still have bills that are due.
I have a family that I have to take care of, so it's a lot of uncertainty that comes along with this.
Um, I'm grateful for these opportunities to receive assistance, but there is a lot of uncertainty that comes along with it, and it causes a lot of stress as well.
Now the American Federation of Government Employees, the nation's top federal workers' union is calling on Congress to immediately end the shutdown by passing a bill without agreeing to demands from Democrats to extend health care subsidies from the Affordable Care Act that are set to expire Saturday, November 1st, doubling premiums for some 20 million people, as many federal workers turn to food pantries.
The Department of Agriculture says it'll cut food aid to some 42 million people who rely on SNAP, that supplemental nutrition assistance program, starting Saturday.
President Trump says he will not tap into a contingency fund of five billion dollars to keep SNAP running.
This is Jill Dixon, executive director of the Food Depot, a food bank in northern New Mexico.
For every meal that a food bank provides, the SNAP program provides nine.
There's no way we can replace every single one of those meals.
It is not sustainable for food banks to fill this gap.
We were not built to do this.
On Monday, Senator Bernie Sanders posted on social media, Trump's throwing 15 million Americans off health care.
He's doubling premiums for 20 million Americans.
Now he's refusing to use a five billion dollar emergency SNAP fund to keep 16 million kids from going hungry.
But the one percent keep one trillion dollars in tax breaks, oligarchy and action center said.
We'll look more at health care in a minute.
We begin in Washington, DC with Gina Platanino, interim director for SNAP at the Food Research and Action Center FRAC.
Thanks so much for being with us, Gina.
Lay out what's happening.
What is at stake this week?
At stake, it is the livelihood, it is food on the table for over 42 million of Americans who are going to lose their faith in government if the Secretary of Agriculture doesn't utilize these contingency reserves that she has in place that she has been given the authority to utilize to ensure that SNAP benefits in November are not delayed.
And Gina, the uh the Department of Agriculture, with uh Trump's appointee Brooke Rollins, put out a quite amazing uh statement on their website.
They they they have in a notice to the public quote bottom line, the well has run dry.
At this time, there will be no benefits issued November one.
We are approaching an inflection point for Senate Democrats.
They can continue to hold out for health care for illegal aliens and gender mutilation procedures or reopen the government so mothers, babies, and the most vulnerable among us can receive critical nutrition assistance.
Have you ever seen such a such a statement by a government agency?
No, and and everything's incorrect.
I mean, we can go down the line and breaking down every point and to just say, you know, everything's a lie.
You know what we can throw out data, so much data in terms of who benefits from SNAP, 96% are U.S.
citizens, majority of people who utilize SNAP are are white Americans.
Um the people who benefit from this program are Americans.
Um, but really what it comes down to is unfortunately made um individuals who utilize this so that they can pay for rent um because they don't have enough money.
Majority of people who are in SNAP are working, they live paycheck to paycheck, and this will offset them while SNAP is supposed to be a supplemental program.
In reality, it's their whole food budget.
And when you have to make a decision between making sure that there's food on the table for your child while they may be getting food at school, when they come home, they're gonna see mommy and daddy skipping meals.
Um, so it's just unfortunately that they're utilizing human beings, Americans as a political battle, as a chess pieces, when they are have to they're gonna have to face their landlord and say, I I don't have money for food, I don't know if I can pay my rent.
So we're gonna see, and we're starting to use see a higher utilization of credit card debt for those who still have credit cards.
Um we are going to see, you know, more people going into the food banks, but the food banks do not have the resources and they can't make up what SNAP does, nine meals for everyone that a food bank does.
So we are going to see a decrease in people's well-being, unnecessary mental health and pressure, similarly to what we saw in the previous shutdown under the first Trump administration.
But even then, the secretary appointed was able to ensure that benefits went out earlier so we wouldn't be in the situation where we are now, which is why Congress gave the authority to the secretary through contingency funds that they could utilize them, and they have been utilizing them to pay administrative expenses for the states.
So they just have to tap it into those resources and then the additional reserves, for example, in section 32 that they utilize to fund WIC.
The Secretary can and she utilized this authority and not play with people's lives, their livelihood with their food, particularly when everything's more expensive.
And uh, how are some states responding to this looming uh uh cutback?
Remember that SNAP is a federal program.
The state handles all of the federal money.
So this idea that, like, they are buckets of money sort of laying around, it's it's uh it's not correct.
And states are already have been trying to figure out how to come back from the reconciliation bill signed by Trump by President Trump in the summer uh in July, because they were already trying to figure out how they were gonna continue paying for SNAP because for the first time in history, SNAP has to become a line item budget if people want to continue putting this in the program because um uh the reconciliation law takes away 187 billion dollars from SNAP.
So this is in continuation in terms of what the uh the administration finds.
So states were already dealing with this, saying how we're going to implement all of these changes, how are we going to do this with less administrative resources?
How are we going to put money up front?
And now the shutdown is happening, and people are very, you know, justifiably very angry and and just upset and don't understand that uh the person that can make all of this go away is the secretary is the president by just the secretary utilizing her power, and some states are saying, Should we utilize funding?
They can't do it.
They don't have the resources, they are not additional reserves.
And USCA sent out two memos on Friday.
One of them said that states will not get reimbursed if they utilize this.
So we know that Virginia's governor called it a state of emergency, and they're figuring out how to do this.
We've heard from other states as well.
The um governor of California gave more money to food banks and mobilized the National Guard to help carry the food and make sure that they process the food, but this is a band-aid on a bigger issue, and it just shows the impact that the federal inaction is causing.
So finally, Gina Plata Niño, um, the children.
How many children in the US rely on SNAP and what's going to happen now?
The majority of people on SNAP are children, followed by older adults and followed by people with disabilities.
Um, you know, what's gonna happen now is that these kids are going to school.
Thankfully, there's child nutrition programs, they're gonna get their breakfast, they're going to get their get their lunch, but then they're gonna go home.
And people forget that children don't live by themselves, right?
They have a caretaker.
That caretaker is already incredibly stressed out how they're going to pay their bill and have food on the table.
So, you know, the children are gonna say, you know, mommy daddy, why don't we have uh a Thanksgiving meal?
Why don't we have enough food at the table?
Why aren't you eating?
Um, why do you look so stressed?
And this is unnecessary burden on children to have to deal with everything else that's going on in in their environment.
So we're we're gonna see an uh increase of mental health issues and a lower well-being for many individuals.
And your final comment on the fact that the one trillion dollar tax cut for billionaires remains in place as children go hungry.
Yes, and and that's what people don't understand that this that ceiling issue that would happen in July was a policy choice, right?
It was to extend these tasits to incredibly wealthy individuals, it's not working class Americans, it's not middle class Americans, it is the wealthiest of wealthiest because as all of us are struggling to pay for food that is more expensive, three percent more expensive, three times more expensive than it was uh last year.
Billionaires are spending more money.
There are various stories and and research and studies to show that they have more money to spend because this is what the tax break did.
While the individuals who are working hard, because majority of people on SNAP are working, getting paid less than a thousand dollars.
The same corporations that got large tax breaks are not paying people livable wages, and so they have to rely on SNAP.
And now they're not they may not be able to pay for food, they may not be able to pay for rent because they need to be able to eat.
Gina Plata Nino, and thank you for being with us, interim director for SNAP at the food research and action center, a nonprofit working to end hunger in America.
This is Democracy Now, Democracy Now.org.
I'm Amy Goodman with Juan Gonzalez.
As the US federal government shutdown enters its 20th day, we now look at how Democrats are demanding Republicans agree to extend health care subsidies from the Affordable Care Act that are set to expire Saturday.
If Republicans want the votes to end the shutdown, health insurance premiums are expected to more than double for some 20 million people, unless Congress acts.
Many have already faced sticker shock when they received letters about their new premiums.
The enhanced subsidies were first put in place during the pandemic.
For more, we're joined here in New York by Dr.
Steffi Woolhandler, distinguished professor of public health at Hunter College CUNY, co-founder of physicians for a national health program, contributes regularly to top medical journals, co-authored the latest report just out in Lens that headlined health care in the USA.
Money has become the mission.
Welcome back to Democracy Now, Dr.
Wolhandler.
Explain what you mean.
Money has become the mission.
Exactly what is happening, what the Republicans are refusing to do right now to reopen the government, because the Democrats are saying they won't vote for an end to the shutdown until these tax subsidies are uh extended.
Okay.
Well, the purpose of health care has increasingly become profit making rather than a public service.
Uh, specifically, uh Congress and Trump have refused to extend the tax credits, which will double the premiums for 20 million uh Americans who get their coverage through the Affordable Care Act.
Um, that's the line in the sand that the Democrats have drawn on the shutdown.
But the bigger issues include that the one big beautiful bill that Trump signed into law on July 4th is going to cut one trillion dollars out of the Medicaid program, which more than one in every five Americans rely on to make their health care affordable.
Additionally, Trump has been giving uh give a giveaways to the private insurance industries, uh private insurance companies that have taken over the Medicare Advantage program.
Uh, he doubled their pay increase this year, uh, even though we already know that they're being overpaid by about $80 billion a year because a congressional medic official congressional Medicare Payment Advisory Commission says they're being overpaid 80 billion.
Nonetheless, Trump doubled their pay increase, meaning that prices will go up for the taxpayers and will go up for Medicare beneficiaries.
So there's many things that Trump is doing.
The Republican Congress is doing to accelerate price increases and favor the for-profit uh provision of health care rather than thinking about health care as the public service.
And uh Steffi Woolhandler, uh, these cuts will uh affect not just Medicaid, but also many people who are in uh let's say small business owners or the self-employed.
Could you talk about that sector of the population that will be affected?
Well, many people are going to be affected by cuts in various ways, but the refusal to extend the subsidies, which is what what we're talking about with the uh shutdown, uh, that affects uh small businesses, it affects uh near poor people, middle income people the most.
The Medicaid cuts affect everybody too.
That's not just the poorest of the poor.
Um, Medicaid actually provides uh subsidies to many people on Medicare to reduce the price of their medications.
Medicaid is a major source of funding for most uh rural hospitals, uh, many community hospitals get a big chunk of their funding for Medicaid.
So when that Medicaid funding is cut, it's going to be hard for community hospitals to pay their bills, and that will affect uh the health care quality for everyone.
Um, so the Trump administration and Congress are cutting in many, many ways.
And uh you were mentioning also of Medicare Advantage.
We're in this period now with literally on television, cable, social media, all of these uh Medicare Advantage companies are constantly, constantly, every single day advertising uh to uh to seniors.
Uh it's an enormous amount of expenditure just to create more market share for each of these companies.
Why do we even need to go through all of this every year?
Well, you're correct.
The Medicare Advantage program is a giant waste of money.
It's raised the cost to the taxpayers by 80 billion last year alone by over 600 billion over the past 20 years or so, uh, and yet the Trump administration is further encouraging it.
It also raises cost to Medicare beneficiaries through the Part B premiums.
Uh, pushes them up.
So uh we should have never turned over the Medicare program to these private profit seeking insurance companies like United Healthcare.
It was a giant mistake, and we should be trying to reverse that mistake now rather than encouraging it as the Trump administration is doing.
Dr.
Woolhandler put this in a global context um in the industrialized world where does the U.S.
stand I mean in this country I think people overall believe in public education I mean you can go to a private school if you have the money but that everyone should be able to get an education in this country why does that not extend to health care and explain how we compare uh to Canada who Trump is punishing right now to Britain I mean you are the co-founder of physicians for a national health program and w how do you see us getting there from here?
Well every other developed nation has some form of national health insurance or national health service when we compare the United States to those other nations we find that health care costs are more than 50% higher in the U.S.
than they are in other nations when we look at uh outcomes like life expectancy we find that Americans live four years shorter than people in other countries were dying four years younger than people in Canada or France or Holland.
So the the national health programs have been much more effective both in guaranteeing universal access making health care affordable and also controlling costs.
So we really need to be moving in that direction and away from our private profit oriented healthcare system.
Well there have been major movements for uh single payer Medicare for all over time uh that the issue of healthcare affordability and access is not going away and I think that that is the vision that uh Senator Sanders and many others have put forward about where we need to be going and that is what we need to be doing is keeping our eye on the prize creating an alternative vision to what Trump is offering right now.
Dr.
Steffi Willhandler physician distinguished professor of public health at Hunter College CUNY City University of New York co-founder of physicians for national health program.
We'll link to your latest report and Lancet healthcare in the USA money has become the mission coming up David Sorota of the lever unmaster plan the hidden plot to legalize corruption in America stay with us it's Christmas time in Washington.
Democrats rehearse in gear for four more years of things not getting worse republicans drink whisky thank you lucky stars.
They say cannot seek another term there no more FDRs.
And these wondering what it means would a good Christmas in Washington by Steve Earl here in our Democracy Now studio.
This is Democracy Now Democracy Now dot org I'm Amy Goodman with Ron Gonzalez the rights secret plan to help billionaires by elections that's the headline of a recent article by our next guest David Sorota editor in chief of the Lever in the article David writes about how two upcoming Supreme Court cases could turn the country into what he calls a kleptocracy.
The article's based on Sorota's new book Master Plan, the hidden plot to legalize corruption in America.
David's also has a new piece in the nation on the New York Mayoral race the real lesson from Zoran Mamdani's ascent.
David Sarota, welcome back to Democracy Now um why don't you start off by talking about how you define the master plan?
We talked to you when you did this series of podcasts on it.
The hidden plot to legalize corruption in America.
So we're immersed in corruption.
You see it in the headlines every day, and I think there's this perception that this is a uh natural uh course of events in the sense of it's a force of nature.
But what we unearthed in the book, uh, for the first time really ever is the secret plan to make this kind of corruption that we're immersed in legal.
A plan hatched in the uh early 1970s uh to begin deregulating the campaign finance system and narrowing and making essentially unenforceable the anti-bribery laws in America.
It started with the Powell memo.
Uh there was a lot of organizing.
Uh, the this memo written by uh assumed to be Supreme Court Justice Lewis Powell, who urged uh a corporate investment and an oligarch investment in politics and media uh because he was afraid, and corporate America was afraid of the rising tide uh of consumer protection laws and the like.
Uh and and that m out of that movement in the early 1970s came the movement to create court rulings and legal precedents, uh equating money in politics uh not with corruption, but with s with constitutionally protected speech, giving corporations those constitutional rights to spend and in elections and by elections, ultimately culminating in citizens united.
Meanwhile, a series of court rulings starting in the mid two uh mid-2010s uh to overturn corruption convictions, to narrow the definition of bribery, uh leading up to now, as you alluded to in the intro, uh, two cases at the Supreme Court, one spearheaded by Vice President J.D.
Vance, uh, to eliminate what is essentially what was left of campaign finance restrictions after Citizens United and to further reduce the definition of bribery uh to make essentially quid pro quo transactions in politics legal.
This is all part of a plan uh by a corporate movement that sees democracy, uh the government providing what people want, sees that as a threat, and wants to turn the democracy from a one vote uh uh one vote kind of democracy into a one-dollar kind of democracy where money is the decider.
But uh but David, why do you call it a secret plan if it's basically uh a class or a group a group of people within a class clearly operating uh in their in their own interests?
That's certainly true.
What we uncover in the book is from the Powell memo, this memo written by Lewis Powell, uh, came never before revealed uh a series of meetings and task forces by the country's most powerful people.
We're talking about executives at major media companies and Fortune 500 companies forming a task force uh to implement uh the Powell memo's uh demands that corporations invest in and essentially take over American politics.
What you saw in the 1970s into the eighties and nineties was uh the implementation uh of what the Powell memo had called for.
And it it it was not revealed.
It was all much of it was done in secret.
We're talking about uh investments in uh motion pictures.
We're talking about investments in uh media entities.
We're talking about uh uh strategizing for how to implement and put loopholes into campaign finance laws.
One of the first meetings that came out of the PAL memo, let me give you one example, uh, was a meeting uh at at Disney World, where they flew in Gerald Ford, who was soon to be the president, uh, at a time when anti-corruption laws were moving through Congress after Watergate, and they ended up slipping in a loophole into that original campaign finance bill, which created the corporate pack for the first time.
Uh, and of course, from there we get the rulings that I've just mentioned.
Uh, you also uh talk about uh the Mamdani campaign uh and uh a lot of the political pundits uh ascribing his success to his messaging and charisma, but you raise also the issue of how a public financing of elections has made uh Mamdani's success possible as well.
Yeah, to my mind, having worked on campaigns and having reported on uh political campaign finance, there's this d debate, right?
Is it did Zoran Mamdani ascend because of his charisma, his slick ads, uh his message?
I think all of those were factors, but I don't think there really would be a Zoran Mamdani campaign without New York City's system of publicly financed campaigns, a system that offers candidates like Zoran Mamdani, any qualifying candidates, matching funds, public matching funds for their small donations.
So we've seen a lot of oligarch money flow into the New York City mayor's race.
The reason Mamdani has been able to run a well-resourced campaign is because of that public financing system, which gives a candidate like him access to resources that don't come with the demands of legislative favors.
They are not private money uh donations that come uh from donors who want things from from City Hall.
So Mamdani, that system has given Mamdani enough money not to outspend his opponents, but to at least run a competitive campaign.
And so I think people looking at that race, wondering what the takeaways are for democracy.
How can we have more outside the system candidates who can stand up to billionaires and oligarchs and the like, they should be looking at New York City's public financing system as a replicable model in other cities and other states across the country.
If you can talk David Sarota about all the latest news, for example, um the pardons of the Binance CEO and what this means for the Trump family.
Um you have President Trump last Thursday pardoning the convicted founder of the cryptocurrency exchange Binance, uh Chiang Peng Zhao.
Um he pleaded guilty in 2023 to enabling money laundering while he was uh uh CEO of Binance.
According to the Wall Street Journal, Binance struck a business deal with World Liberty Financial, the Trump family crypto startup, which has generated four and a half billion dollars since Trump returned to office.
And then there's a major uh Reuters expose, the US president's family raking in more than 800 million dollars from sales of crypto assets in the first half of this year alone.
Um, if you can explain how that fits into your uh description of a master plan.
For sure.
I mean, this is this is really the culmination of it.
Uh starting in the mid-uh 2010s, there was a series of rulings.
This is if people remember the uh Virginia Governor Bob McDonald uh corruption case where he was convicted and the Supreme Court, the Roberts Court intervened to overturn the uh that conviction.
That became the Chris Christie AIDS case, uh the Andrew Cuomo AIDS case, uh a bunch of of corruption convictions that were overturned, culminating uh in last year's decision where an Indiana mayor uh was convicted on corruption for delivering a government contract uh and then getting a payment uh from the contractor afterwards, that conviction corruption was overturned.
The court said uh that that it wasn't bribery, it was a gratuity.
So so Trump is operating in a legal environment that has so narrowed down the definition of corruption to make it almost uh unprosecutable and unenforceable.
So I think when we look at stories of Donald Trump uh his business dealings in uh enriching himself uh through his position as president, we have to understand that they are knowingly operating inside of a legal environment that that has made it almost impossible to prosecute bribery, and that was part of the plan to deregulate the campaign finance system and to reduce those bribery laws because reducing uh those bribery laws and deregulating the campaign finance system essentially reduces the power of of people.
It it it rigs the democracy.
How can Trump be held accountable if the highest court in the land essentially says that bribery is no longer a crime?
And David, could you talk about the intimidation and the changes in ownership in the major media companies uh to basically bring them under heel to uh uh this uh authoritarian government we have now?
I'm so glad you asked this.
Uh, you know, one of the things that we uncovered that was kind of, in a sense, shocking to me because it was so explicit.
Back when Lewis Powell wrote his memo in the early 1970s, and there were these task forces about implementing the Powell memo.
Some of the uh this the top executives at the largest media companies in the country uh participated in that endeavor to implement the PAL memo.
We unearthed a letter from CBS uh CBS's president at the time saying not only did he agree uh with the Powell memo's uh directives and ideology, but that he was working to correct the situation at CBS News.
That's a direct quote.
And so I think we have to look at what's gone on in with media consolidation.
We have 30 seconds, David.
With Donald Trump uh uh essentially saying media mergers are predicated on his political ideology, we have to look at that as the culmination of the government uh trying to pressure and successfully pressuring media companies to do its bidding.
We want to thank you so much, David, for being with us.
David Sorota, founder and editor-in-chief of the Lever, speaking to us from Denver, Colorado, co-author of Master Plan, the Hidden Plot to Legalize Corruption in America.
That does it for our show, Democracy Now is produced with Mike Burke, Renee Feltz, Dina Guster, Messiah Rhodes, Nermin Shaykh, Maria Terraceina, Nicole Salazar, Sarah Nasser, Trina Nadura, Sam Alcoff, Tay Marie Astudio, John Hamilton, Robbie Karen, Hanima Sud.
I'm Amy Goodman with Juan Gonzalez.
Thanks for joining us, and the proud of the program.
In this show, we'll meet the volunteer commissioners and board members who provide expertise and guidance in critical decision making that affects our community.
Journey with us as we take an insider's look into the legislative process.
Hi, I'm Autumn King.
And in this episode, we're joined by part members of the Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission.
Today we're joined by Commissioner Duane Aikins, Commissioner Corbin, and Director Nicholas Williams.
Welcome to you all.
Thank you.
Thanks for having us.
So first, let's get into what this department is.
Can you tell us a little bit about Parks Recreation and Youth Development as a department?
The Parks Recreation and Youth Development Department exists to create equitable access to parks and recreational programs and facilities throughout Oakland for all of Oaklanders.
And so we have after school programs, summer programs, we have uh aquatic programs, sports programs, cultural enrichment programs, programs for adults, seniors, and youth.
Um our primary focus is youth development, and so our primary focus for programming is for youth, but we have programs for all of Oaklanders.
And what does that look like?
What does that look like as far as the actual programs that you have for youth versus the ones that you have for teens versus the ones that you have for adults?
We have a myriad of programs.
Um we include summer camp, after school programs, enrichment programs.
Again, you know, we have sports programs both for adults who like to get out and and and compete.
Um we have intramural programs, less competition, but we have a variety of of sports programs for for youth as well.
Um and then we have uh cultural artistic experiences, we have reintroduction to nature programs, and so everything that involves green space, outdoor space, reintroduction to nature, um, we have a robust swimming initiative, and then everything that happens in our summer programs and after school.
Excellent.
So how does that tie into the commission itself?
What are some of the work that you do on the commission, Commissioner Corbin?
So some of the work that we do is um policy related, and so we are a volunteer organization of representatives of our community, and so any sort of park issues usually come before the board anywhere from events, anywhere from the re-establishment of like a recreation center, the new buildings, anything that has to do with green space, nature within um the city of Oakland, we have a say on it.
And what's really important about that is for the community to have a see on it.
So we're community representatives working alongside of the government, and what we also do is liaison work with the recreation center so we can have like on the gr on-the-ground knowledge of what our community members are dealing with and their needs and concerns, and we bring that to parks and recreation and hopefully um work out a resolution.
So that's a lot of our work is so you're actually bringing the community's voice to Director Williams and others within the department to help shape the department and how it moves forward.
That's correct, um, definitely that.
So listening to a lot of community members that are dealing with anything from, for instance, the homeless encampment issue to making sure that the parks are safe, providing accessible parks beyond proximity, but where people can actually produce their culture, whether that's barbecuing, whether that's praying, whether that is just enjoying a quiet time, because it's such a shared space, we have to think about everybody, and we want to make sure that everybody has uh a space and a place to feel welcome at all of our parks in Oakland.
So then give me some specific issues or projects that you guys are working on right now, Commissioner Aikens.
So when I when I got to the commission in 2017, it was really more so talking about re-engaging the RACs, and that's the recreation advisory councils for the specific parks.
And so that looks totally different from the MPHCs that are sent around.
MPHC.
The neighborhood associate association groups that normally meet, and they pretty much most times meet at the recreation centers, but they're interested in making sure that their neighborhood parks are strong and specifically the ones with recreation centers.
For example, I'm uh now-assigned to Rainbow, Brookdale, Arroyo, and Golden Gate Park.
So part of my job is developing relationships with those parks.
The easiest relationship to develop was obviously with Arroyo Park because that's where I started most of my work for in this space by being on a on the board of directors for keep Oakland Beautiful.
And uh that's how that's how I end up getting appointed to be on the commission based off of doing that work.
And so the goal there is to all the new faces that's moving into that community to get them more so engaged, have more so like secession planning meetings.
Me and uh Commissioner Corbin actually have the cool opportunity to pretty much develop a RAC toolkit so that we can have uh widgets basically, so our commissioners can go out there and say, look, this is what this is what this part looks like, this is what this part looked like, and just really being strong enough and uh passionate enough to connect people with the things that's going on in city in the city, uh let them know the resources that they have, the grant opportunities that some programs have to support, so really being a voice and uh in a connector.
And it sounds like what you're doing is also finding the thread and keeping the continuity between the missions and the goals of the department and what the public is seeing.
Is that a fair statement?
Yes, Director Williams, can you tell us a little bit about how your role and and staff members interact with the board?
So, as the director of the department, it's my role to direct the internal staff, and so I serve as the liaison between the department and the PRAC commissioners, and so um in those meetings, we we um uh talk about um pre-planning, um, we uh talk about park rules, and then I share the thoughts and the direction that comes from the commissioners with staff, and then we direct the department to to act accordingly to the to the rules and and to the uh established protocols that we put together with the PRAC.
And how often do you all meet?
Once a month.
All right.
This is a probably a good time for our first break.
We'll have some more conversation with our commissioners as soon as we get back.
We're back.
Thanks for joining us.
Once again, we are joined by the Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission.
In that last segment, we were talking about uh a few, there were a few themes that came up about service and the roles that you all play, and it really got me to thinking about your volunteering.
This is an unpaid position.
Why did you get involved with this commission?
I see you chuckling.
What is that are you questioning your involvement at this point?
What is it that actually drove you to be part of the parks and recreation advisory commission?
For me, uh, yeah, I was laughing because I do a lot of volunteer work.
I actually run a nonprofit organization, but I was on a board of directors for six years for Keep Oakland Beautiful.
So I did my full term in close, near halfway being done.
I just finished the fellowship with organizing for action, which is under Barack Obama regime.
So I was like, it gotta be something else that I can do civically to get more insight information.
And uh I use the green spaces, so I was like, I love going to the parks, I'm always there, why not contribute to the parks and then seeing uh so many of the violent things and stuff that were going on in the park, especially a royal.
I talk about that park a lot because I grew up down the street from it and I work in education, and every time you cut on the TV, uh in recent recent years, you hear about some young person getting killed walking through the park, somebody being found in the creek.
So I really wanted to figure out ways to where I can engage the community on the next level instead of just going out there for Creek the Bay Day, Earth Day and doing cleanup projects, but how can I represent my community, show uh individuals that look like me definitely that there's some of us that are here sitting at the table.
We're communicating for you, and we want to model this for you so you can have the courage to do it too.
And then lastly, uh Donald Trump actually got me fired up to get more engaged because I feel like in cities and in our national government that we have a lot of folks that sent with power and they're not utilizing their voice to directly affect my community.
So I want to be somebody that can definitely say regardless to whatever happened at the end of the day, you'll know that Dwayne Aikins did something for you.
I was valued and uh I was working hard for you.
So that's that's why I joined the commissioner.
Commissioner Corbin, what drives you to volunteer your time serving the people of Oakland in this way?
Well, I grew up in the DMV, which is like DC Maryland, Virginia area, which a lot of our park spaces were free and accessible.
Um the museums were free, and this idea of public space became so intimate in my growth.
I'm a student at UC Berkeley, I'm a PhD candidate, I study race class and access to green space, and I've been an Oaklander since 2011 solidly, but since 2004, I've been between Oakland and and um Berkeley.
And I just realized that I don't think I would be in the position I am getting a PhD if it wasn't for public spaces.
Um they're educational, it's it's fun spaces, it's spaces where you can meet your neighbors and build community.
It it has all these things to it that a lot of people don't actually realize.
It it can bridge a lot of barriers.
But programming is important and the funding is important, and so looking that looking at Oakland and realizing that you to go to the zoo it costs money, to go to the museum it costs money.
Um, I don't know where I would be being raised by a single mom in low income community if I had if the economic barrier was there for me.
And for that, I feel giving back, being a latchkey kid in the 80s, growing up in the recreation center.
So for instance, I'm squaring my dephemory shirt so going there just reminds me of home you know you can just talk you can have conversations you see kids playing and it's not only healing for me you know but it's something that I can do for my community and that's why it became really important for me to not only um volunteer but give back to Oakland um a city that has done so much for me and I kinda use this line that I was born and raised in the DMV but I became an adult in Oakland and that's pretty prideful for me.
So I heard you drop your shirt and we talked about it earlier.
So you want to let everyone see at home what you're wearing and tell us a little bit about it.
So Defemory Park is a historical African American park um that um the African American community that came here during the South during World War II.
Um interesting enough during all the World War II uh shipbuilding and everything that was going on in Richmond the USO soldiers couldn't be there because of segregation.
So the only places that they can actually cut a rug and enjoy themselves as officers serving our country was at Defemory Park.
And a lot of folks don't know that that those USO USO soldiers actually opened the space for the Black Panthers to come in and do their work at at Defemory Park.
So there's this really interesting history of park space culture creation um green space creation in Oakland that I don't think a lot of folks know but all of that history like resides in the community.
So if you just go out there and talk you get a whole history lesson and to support the park we're actually selling two shirts.
So it's two for 25 I believe one for 15 um it will go towards a lot of needs that need to be met for um our kids kids like myself that are low income that could probably use help with scholarships, after school programs and so this is part of the work is also understanding that our park needs support and we can be park pride prideful and we can also fund it through these really interesting ways.
I love that I'm gonna have to get my shirt please.
Director Williams, you are not volunteering this is not a committee that you sit on um just for giggles.
Tell me a little bit about your work with the commission and and what you see as as your connection as the director of the department in working directly with the commission and getting work done.
Well the commission is vital to the forward progress of parks recreation youth development in Oakland.
When we think about um some of the ills that Oakland is facing as a community and as a society and we think about what parks and recreation youth development becomes for so many of our kids um it becomes a safe place.
It becomes a place after school where I can get something to eat it becomes a place where I can get assistance with my homework that I may be struggling with.
It becomes a place where I can um talk to my friends where I can get actually the time and space to be a kid.
And so the work that we do the policies and the rules and the procedures that we put together to operate parks and recreation in Oakland is extremely important.
We're in a royal park.
My dad I learned how to ride my bike in a royal I learned how to hit a softball, learn how to shoot a basket, I learned how to run from a dog, you know everything at a royal park and so I know how important it is and that was like super special time.
And so when we go out to the recreation centers now and we see kids um and they're laughing and playing and smiling and learning and engaging um learning tools that there need to be that they will need to be a productive citizens and we know that we're doing the right work and so it's it's my job to stay connected to the commission to have um to make sure that we have our ear to the community so that we can push forward programs that the community needs, and so that we're always an agency that is providing for the specific needs regionally and around our neighborhoods and then collectively for Oakland as a whole.
And so the commission is extremely important.
There's a lot of work um that goes along with this department, and we couldn't do it by ourselves, and so we're thankful to have the relationship with the commissioners um thank you for your work.
And so um it's we love it.
It's very rewarding um and if you go out to the recreation centers and you see the smiles on the kids' face, you'll we know that you know that our work is meaningful and needed.
Um we also provide opportunities for adults and seniors.
Um this thing about nature and being in green space is so important.
Um there's actually scientific medical data now that says that there's healing that takes place in greenspace.
There's healing that takes place along the waterfront or in the woods, and so we want to make sure that these places are safe and accessible because if you need to everybody should have the opportunity to have these this type of healing quality that happens in our natural spaces.
Oakland is so unique.
You can go to the water, you know.
It's very unique in inner city.
Um you've got the Joaquin Miller, where you can oversee the skyline.
So there's so much that it has to offer.
We want to make sure that our kids get to experience all of it.
Sounds like we need another t-shirt for every single park that we have.
I already hear two votes for Arroyo having their own t-shirt.
And so, next, can we get one for Diamond?
That's my closest part.
Okay.
Okay.
And then we'll do Walkie Miller.
That's another one I go to a lot.
Sign you up for the t-shirt.
Sign me up for the t-shirts.
We're gonna take a quick break and then we'll come back and talk to you guys just a little bit more.
Thanks for watching.
We are inside City Hall, and we are talking to the Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission.
We'll be right back.
Hi, my name is Yvonne Gusitus, and I'm the director of community engagement with the mayor's office in the city of Oakland.
I'm here to invite you to apply for our boards and commissions.
We have about 35 of them, and we believe there's a board or commission for everyone, and we really want to make sure that our boards and commissions reflect the diversity of Oakland.
So, how do you apply?
You head to our city's website, you'll see boards and commissions, click on that.
That page will have a listing of all of our boards and commissions, and you'll be able to see uh what the requirements are, what the meeting times are, if there are any vacancies, um, read through those, see which ones interest you, and you can apply for one of them by clicking on the green apply button, or you can apply for few all at once.
You'll be asked to submit your resume as well as a couple sentences of why you're interested, and then once you hit submit, we'll get uh the application and you'll get a confirmation that you've applied.
It takes about two to three months uh for us to review the application.
The review is handled by either the staff liaison to the board or the board chair or nominating committee, and they're just trying to see that uh your interests match up and also your qualifications match up with the requirements of the board.
That then gets sent to the mayor and I.
We prepare a letter of appointment, she'll sign it, and then the ultimate approval and vote is done by city council.
Then the city clerk's office helps you get sworn in and sign any necessary paperwork.
So we want to encourage you to apply.
There is a board and commission for everyone.
Uh, we definitely want people who uh want to help local government and believe in local government.
Um boards and commissions work on things that Oaklanders care about, whether it's libraries, parks.
Uh, there are a number of boards that were created by voter mandates.
For example, Measure H created the Sugar Sweeten Beverage Tax Advisory Board.
Uh, Measure L L created the police commission.
Uh, but ultimately uh each board has its own unique set of requirements, and we're really seeking folks from all sorts of uh life experiences and backgrounds to be a part of each board.
So again, we encourage you to apply, and if you have any questions, you can always reach out to the mayor's office and myself.
So we hope to see you and your application uh coming in, and then you'll be able to join the 300 plus team of excellent volunteers for the city of Oakland.
Welcome back.
I'm Autumn King, and once again we are talking with the Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission.
So in the last segment, we were talking a great deal about your personal uh uh entrance into working with Parks and Rec.
Tell me a little bit about the work that you do that services the actual individual Oakland people.
How is your work servicing individual people in Oakland?
Well, I'll talk about um just Commissioner Corbin, for example.
Um I host my own independent summer camp, but I hit Commissioner Corbin up and I was like, I really want my summer campers to learn more about the commission, learn a little bit about the work that we do.
Can you talk about this just environmental justice because that's what she's getting her doctoral degree in, which is pretty pretty cool, and also for kids to see somebody that looked like them that's a woman getting that degree from UC Berkeley, I thought that was pretty big.
And at first I was like, these kids gonna be horrible, they not go really like this, but I mean the pictures that they drew uh from her uh from her uh lesson was awesome, and they start looking at when we're walking through communities going to parks, they start looking at them differently, even with the homeless crisis that's going on, they was connecting things there.
And uh yesterday I was at Rainbow Park working with uh teen Oakland and we also did an environmental justice urban planning lesson.
So we literally walked from seminary all the way up to 70 73rd to uh and just had a conversation about the community.
What do you see?
What don't you see?
And they was like, we see a whole bunch of churches.
I said, Is anything wrong with that?
One young lady said, the churches look beat up.
Then uh I was like, okay, not good to say that about the churches, but it was a real thing to say.
And then I said, What else you see?
We don't have enough garbage cans.
And I was like, Okay, what else you see?
I see a lot of litter.
And then we got to Haven's Court, and I said, look to the left, because we're on the on the opposite side of the school.
And uh I said, This looked very suburban.
And I was like, why is that?
This and they one of the kids actually jumped in jumped into tax bracket.
And so we had like this really good conversation.
Like it was like everything to the right is really dirty, but everything to the left when you go up that block looks really good.
And um, I think they left feeling empowered and understanding more so why it's important to do the work of Teen Oakland and not just consider themselves just walking around picking up trash.
And uh true story, uh I graduated from Oakland Technical High School, and uh I remember some guys from UC Berkeley, they came to our econ government class.
And so they would come once a week and we would walk to the MacArthur Bart station and we sketched out pictures and all that stuff that Corbyn was doing this summer with the kids about what do a futuristic park look like.
And um we sketched those buildings that's coming up.
And I was like, I wonder is any of those guys that was in there talking to us, was they a part of that cohort of this whole big picture?
And so when you really get the impact youth on a bigger level and let them know that yes, you hear all these stories about gentrification, all these things, but if you equip yourself with the tools and the resources that you can be here in Oakland if you want to stay and you can compete and you can be a part of the change that's happening and have a have your uh feet and be a member of the stakehold stakeholder group.
And uh when you hear when you see individuals, especially the young people, and they really can just hold on to that and remember what you say and then start you start seeing them practice and putting forth the effort and the energy, you're like, okay, this is why I do the work.
This is where I'm gonna go to a commission meeting.
This is why I'm gonna step up and help and do my part.
I like the fact that um you called on your fellow commissioner outside of commission hours for other work that you're doing to help with the community.
Is there a point of pride that you have that you can share with us that uh about your work through the commission, or that's maybe catapulted you into another area?
Well, I think one thing I could say is that being on the commission has given me some wiggle room to really think through ideas and I like to employ like science fiction and afrofuturism, and so the work that we that I did do with uh Commissioner Ankins was I kind of fangirled it and brought all like everything that I owned that was Black Panther.
And um what a lot of folks don't realize, it's like the first Afrocentric green city, you know, and it's it's very different from roots.
It's it's not looking backwards, but it's looking forward, and it really gets people thinking about what does a social a socially and environmentally just future look like for Oakland.
And so, from all of this work, it I am I've again I've nerded out and I've come up with this concept of Jedi.
So environmental Jedi is what I call myself and and our commission was here, which is environmental justice, equity, diversity, and inclusion because you need them all, right?
So justice is looking backwards of all the atrocities and uh a lot of the environmental harms that has happened in the flats of Oakland, but it for that needs that definitely needs to be recognized.
So we need that, we need equity, we need to meet everybody where they are, make sure they have the right resources.
We need to understand what diversity means in our park because everybody gets down in their green spaces differently, and we need to make sure all of us are sharing this, and then inclusion that means different mobilities, different wants, you know, having a multi-generational park system is is very important.
So when you bring that all together for environmental Jedi's, um it's the environmental Jedi way, you know.
Jedi way.
Yeah, and it's kind of a mind trick.
Because people can start talking about parks in a very fun, futuristic way, and we can actually like kind of break free from our past and look at what's possible in the future.
So, how do we Jedi mind trick more folks into joining the commission?
What is the route that people would take in order to join the commission?
I gotta I literally got a Facebook message like here's all the list of the commissions, and they went directly to the uh to the Oakland website, and it listed all the commissions.
You fill out one application and you pick three commissions, and then based on what seat meet filled, uh the mayor, I believe, she looks at all the applications and she pick out the strong ones uh that will be good for here, and then you get appointed, and then your application goes in front of the city council and they vote you in and prove you, and then uh you gotta make sure that you pay attention to your email so you can uh know what's going on.
Do you guys have any openings coming up soon that folks should be on the lookout for on your commission?
I believe we have a couple of openings.
We did so folks can go to the website and look that up.
Definitely, but there's also another layer which um Commissioner Inkins was talking about before, the recreation advisory councils.
So you can actually sign up and be a part of that.
They meet different times each month.
I would say check with the director at the park and see if one is not there, how you can get one started.
But these are multi-layers, and I think it's really important for people to get in where they can fit in.
So some of our community members can show up day of, and some of us can plan a whole year in advance, and we need to find all those spaces for for um connection and to like grow our racks and grow our our residents' connection to our parks.
And it's a good place to actually learn, like, because I came in with a community with a community organizer lens, and I remember telling Corbin this.
I was like, okay, wait, I'm learning how to connect policy with the community and put it together so you can learn how to treat each thing a little differently and be a little bit more open mind to how policy's supposed to be ran versus how you can just get up and say I want to plan the event.
That leads me, and I think it's a very good point.
And what it leads me to wonder, Director Nick Director Williams, is why should anyone care?
Who cares?
Why should our those watching our residents in Oakland, why should they care about this commission and how it functions with the department?
Well, the commission is very important, like we said earlier on how the department um uh thinks about the future and how we can serve um the equitably serve the the citizens of Oakland.
Parks and recreation is the heart and soul of the city.
It belongs to everybody.
It's the place where everybody can be and can be respected and can enjoy themselves, can can it can heal from the natural elements of being outside, um, can be physically fit and and be on a health plan uh with physical activities and programs that happen throughout the recreation center, but it's the place where everyone is welcome and everyone is should be included, and so we want to make sure, as Commissioner Corbin said that the services that we provide um include everyone.
We we want to be fully inclusive.
We we never want anybody to leave the park not feeling like they're a part or not feeling like they're wanted.
This the parks and and rec in Oakland is again the the heart and soul of the city, and it's what brings the city together.
It's where we can come together and be whoever we are individually, but we can be that collectively.
I like that.
We can come together individually to form a collective, the heart and soul of Oakland.
Thank you all for being here.
You guys have been wonderful in sharing your time with the as commissioners, and thank you for sharing your time with our audience today.
Thank you.
This has been another episode of Inside City Hall.
We thank you guys for watching.
We look forward to you joining us for the next episode.
I'm Autumn King.
Thank you.
In this show, we'll meet the volunteer commissioners and board members who provide expertise and guidance in critical decision making that affects our community.
Journey with us as we take an insider's look into the legislative process.
Hi, I'm Autumn King, and welcome to Inside City Hall.
Today we are taking you on a journey with the bicyclist and pedestrian advisory commission.
As a reminder, Inside City Hall takes a look at the commissions and boards that help to shape the city of Oakland.
We like to talk to the commissioners and board members to get a little bit more information about who they are and what they do and why they love to service our great city.
Today we have with us Noelle Pond Danchik, Kenya Wheeler, and Phoenix Mangrum.
Welcome to you all.
Thanks for joining us.
Thanks for having us.
So let's jump right into it.
Tell us a little bit about the bicyclist and pedestrian advisory commission.
What is the commission and what do you guys do?
So the bicyclist and pedestrian advisory commission, we are a commission chartered under City of Oakland ordinance to provide advice and feedback to the Oakland City Council, Mayor, and the administration on bicycle and pedestrian-related policies, programs and activities throughout the city of Oakland.
And we actually have been in operation since uh 2014, February 2014 is when the ordinance was approved to create the commission.
And we actually have a much longer lineage.
The body served as an advisory committee.
So we actually had representatives from community groups, uh stakeholders for certain neighborhoods and um advisory groups like the the East Bay Bicycle Coalition, um Walk Oakland Bike Oakland, that provided advice to city staff on specific bicycle projects and policies.
Um so what does that look like?
Give us a little bit of a picture of you giving advice to or talking about policies with our staff.
How does that look?
Um, just recently in July, um the BPAC, as we call it.
Okay.
Um approved and adopted, uh approved the bicycle, the updating of the of the bicycle uh master plan.
Okay.
And then from there we did advocacy with the planning commission with the uh public works, and we went to the city council and requested uh that they adopt a plan.
Excellent.
So the work that you're getting done behind the scenes, Noelle, what does that look like on the streets of Oakland?
Yeah, so it's all kinds of things.
It's um plans like bicyclists bicycle and pedestrian master plans like Phoenix was talking about, but it's also infrastructure uh projects or citywide programs or legislation and uh we're hearing from the BPAC on all of those things.
So I'm uh City of Oakland staff, um, and other city staff comes to the commission and kind of asks for those recommendations or that advice, and we take that back um to our work and we try and integrate it into the work that we do.
So when I'm driving down the road and I see most recently some new bike lanes, I see new uh uh graphics on the ground um as I'm driving up uh as an example Park Avenue.
Is that something that had to come before you all?
Uh and is that part of the master plan?
Yeah, so I it would it uh definitely um but uh like yeah, so bicycle improvements that you see such as like those lanes on Park Avenue are part of either the citywide master um bicycle plan or um are actually or are delivered as part of individual um city infrastructure projects like our city paving program.
So we currently another big accomplishment that we had as a commission is that we help to provide input to Oak Oakland DOT staff in the development of a new three-year um paving plan, which is actually a hundred million dollar effort to repay um Oakland streets and it's with the real focus on not just the data of where streets are most in need of being repaid, but also looking at um demographics and equity issues around how money is being allocated.
And the in the past we found city staff found that many streets in the Oakland Hills and areas where people were you know asking, making a lot of requests were getting repaid while streets in the flatlands um that weren't major streets weren't being repaid and had some of the worst payment conditions in the in the Bay Area.
So with the work and the paving plan that we have to uh advise city staff on, not only are we seeing these streets be paid, but where there are projects already identified in the bicycle plan to add a bicycle lane or to enhance a bicycle, and maybe taking it from a single lane um to a buffered bike lane, so there's more safer space between drivers and vehicles and uh bikes, those are being implemented by city staff.
And I'm glad you brought up the paving plan because again, I think we get a little bit stuck in the name uh bicyclist and pedestrian advisory commission, but that also has to do with those that are walking down the street and the lights that we see um the paving plan does have impacts on all of us.
Talk a little bit more about the equity um and and the lens of equity that's being used to move these things forward, equity is sort of an after idea to a lot of people, including me sometimes, but that's the that's a good example of equity.
Where as Kenny was saying is a hundred million dollar project, 75 million of that is going to be as Kenya was saying, uh used in in in the communities of concern.
Okay.
That's the word is commonly used, right?
And so that's a good example of of fairness and being just to communities that normally don't uh not regard it very well.
And so do you all take ideas?
Do you do you hear from the public um of their challenges or their successes or things that they really like, and they come to you and then you bring that to staff, or does the staff generate ideas and then comes to you and says, you as the experts help to guide us?
How does that look?
It's a bit of both.
Um I mean our c our commission, we have a uh we're as a public body we have to have a public comment period.
So anyone from the city of Oakland can come to our commission meetings, we meet the uh third Thursday of uh uh each month, uh generally at City Hall, but sometimes we move around.
And we're able to you're able to actually come and bring your problems so we have a a committee of the of commissioners actually just respond to people's comments and work with them when there are issues that may have been reported on our the C Quick Fake app app but haven't been been resolved.
But in addition to that we do have staff coming to us and asking us like with the w even with the um payment plan as an example where there were um staff wanted to know like is our approach on equity does this look right are we are we leaving the communities out really being any areas that aren't being addressed.
So we there is that interplay and we also not just have city Oakland staff but we have staff from other agencies that have projects in Oakland like the last month uh the Almee County Transportation Commission came and spoke to us about a project that they're funding uh in the Port of Oakland that would help connect uh West Oakland to parks that are adjacent to the uh within the port property.
That's really good.
I love interagency partnerships.
I like it when we can all come together and make it better for the city.
So we're gonna continue talking with our commissioners from the bicyclist and pedestrian advisory commission.
We'll be right back.
Hi and welcome back to Inside City Hall.
We've been talking with the bicyclist and pedestrian advisory commission and in our first segment we talked a great deal about what the commission is and what the mission of the commission is now I'd like to get a little bit more about you all.
As uh the audience may know, this is a volunteer voluntary role.
You all are volunteers, you're giving of your time and your expertise to be here.
Not so much you, Miss Noel because you are a staff member, but I'd love to hear a little bit about how as a staff member you got involved with the commission and then I'd love to talk to the commissioners a little bit more about how you got involved and why you give your time to the city of Oakland.
Noelle?
Sure well I got involved in bicyclists and pedestrian issues just as kind of this great nexus of all these things I'm interested in uh combating climate change, safety, equity, public health and I think that so that's why I started um working here but I really wanted to hear more about what people outside of City Hall were saying.
So I think that my favorite part of working with the commission is getting to hear from the commissioners and getting to hear from the public too about what what they're thinking and like when we come up with ideas up in our offices how does that reflect upon the people in our city, the people that are using our streets um so that's where my interest came from.
And how it really affects those and so that you can actually see the work that you're doing in the people that you're actually serving.
That sounds great.
Tell me a little bit Phoenix about your role how did you get involved and how long have you been a a commissioner?
Uh I'm a new commissioner and this was uh um appointed in January.
Welcome.
2019.
However from around 2015, I uh began to attend um meet uh meetings of of the B Pack and um uh what happened from there?
Oh and so I was I'm a uh my my my work is uh as a vice safety educator with adults and youth and so I c was saw coming to the meetings just to broaden my uh knowledge about uh about what you know what was going on and uh mostly they would uh at that time s uh spending a great deal of time on infrastructure and there's a big play between bicycle education and infrastructure you know and so uh that was one of the things that was getting better information about you talked earlier about bike lanes but there's other uh aspects of of the infrastructure uh in addition to the bike lanes that's that is that's important for riding so that uh so that was one of my key things and then the other thing is you know is that um being part of BPAC is another way to serve and to do some good and so um that's that's that's my motivation.
Your call to duty.
Mr.
Kenya, how about you?
What was your journey to our commission?
So I was um if I mean I mentioned before, I don't know, but I was actually a part of the uh B PAC before it was B PAC.
So when we had an advisory committee actually years back, I worked as a transportation planner for BART and was uh working on Oakland related projects so I would come to the B Pack to talk about BART projects or to hear uh concerns that Oaklanders or staff had uh regarding access to BART.
So when it and you know, talking with city staff, it was um I you know worked with um Jason Patton who's the uh bicycle and pedestrian um coordinator is a pro program manager for the city um at that point and when the um commission was actually created, I w I applied and was part of the um inaugural class of commissioners and so I've been on the commission now for the entirety of its existence.
Um and so I think for for me being able to evolve from a staff perspective to actually a community perspective was really uh um uh really also honored because I I felt like I'm able to take some of the professional work that I do in my day job.
Um, you know, I've worked uh in the public sector, uh I've worked in the private sector, so I kind of have a broad understanding of how to implement and design transportation policies and programs and I helped make sure that that knowledge is being brought to bear to projects in Oakland.
When the commission started, we didn't have an Oakland Department of Transportation, so there was very few resources staff wise, and so uh one of the great things the commission did was also a number of commissioners have expertise as planners, as engineers, as architects, and so we were to bring our professional background into the commission to help really help advise policy development that staff wouldn't necessarily have to have access to without having to pay for it.
Um so we provide that sort of added value of like another set of lenses that can help to really ensure that Oakland project projects are are actually um the best that we can have for citizens.
Um and as a v I'm a native of the East Bay, I've lived in Oakland now for well over ten years.
Um so it's great to actually be able to be a part of helping shaping policies I know we're gonna uh you know, help not just you know, myself and my neighbors, but you know, the next generation of Oaklanders that that are are in here.
And one last thing is that we can we really do provide a voice for those who can't get to city hall.
It's like not everyone can take time off to go to a commission meeting, but you know, a lot of uh as commissioners many of us have connections in communities that we can actually represent and make sure those voices are heard um to city staff.
I'm glad you brought that up.
Um my question f to all of you is are you now rock stars?
Do people come up to you, your friends, your family, people that you work with and say, Hey, I've got this idea or I've got this challenge, or I've got this.
Are you now the go-to fix it person for people as they're trying to get things passed through or get information passed on to City Hall?
They're definitely people see us as a conduit now.
Uh you know, our our names like you know many of us have you know, we're featured in um or known not just in the industry, but like you know, like I've been asked by the chronicle to give commentary occasionally on news articles that relate to uh pedestrian bicycle access.
I know Phoenix has also been um reach reached out to by media.
Uh so we are seeing now as like ambassadors for um the public for how do you actually get access to if you have a a question or concern um like w I have inquiries about specific bike projects and some of them are already in our plans, others are ones that need to be developed by staff, but it it does give the public a face of like how you can access the um sort of sometimes not transparent or or seemingly like um large um bureaucracy uh that the city might have.
David and Goliath.
Yeah, I mean, uh let's uh add to what Kenya is saying.
We're looking at now of taking out BPAC meetings to the community.
Mm-hmm.
And uh as well as some of our subcommittees.
And in fact, uh I chair the the subcommittee on police relations.
And so I don't think we have ever met in City Hall.
We've always met outside of and some uh some area of the community.
And so do you see a difference in those that are coming to the meetings when you leave City Hall and actually go to meet people where they are?
Yeah, sure.
It's easier for them to to contact us 'cause we're right there.
Excellent.
And uh so yeah, we're looking at uh doing a BPAC, started doing our BPAC meetings.
Um out in the community as often as we can.
Taking it on the road.
With the last few seconds in this segment, can you share any one particular project that you guys or or one thing that you got moved forward personally that really affected you and made you feel really proud?
Is there any one thing that you've done on the board that's been like, oh yes?
So I mean we've had a lot of a lot of things.
I think we you uh your newest thing, so you have anything they want to chime in on or the uh my champion is is an updating of the master bike plan.
Okay.
Two thousand nineteen.
Okay.
Okay.
I mean that's uh that was a actually I was part of that for almost two years.
And um most of it not being part of the B Pack but part of a community organization that was that was charted to to help the city develop the update.
And so uh but becoming a commissioner and have it and and uh have the commission to say yes uh we want this bike plan and uh then go through all the steps that took for the city council to adopt it.
I'm singing that song I'm just the bill in my head from Schoolhouse Rock.
So you got to see it go all the way through to the end and you and you got your final final product.
That's a that's a good thing.
You are watching inside City Hall and we are talking to the bicycle and pedestrian advisory commission.
We're gonna take a quick break.
Hi my name is Yvonne Cassidus and I'm the director of community engagement with the mayor's office in the city of Oakland.
I'm here to invite you to apply for our boards and commissions we have about 35 of them and we believe there's a board or commission for everyone and we really want to make sure that our boards and commissions reflect the diversity of Oakland.
So how do you apply?
You head to our city's website, you'll see boards and commissions, click on that page will have a listing of all of our boards and commissions and you'll be able to see uh what the requirements are, what the meeting times are, if there are any vacancies, um read through those, see which ones interest you and you can apply for one of them by clicking on the green apply button or you can apply for few all at once.
You'll be asked to submit your resume as well as a couple sentences of why you're interested and then once you hit submit, we'll get uh the application and you'll get a confirmation that you've applied.
It takes about two to three months uh for us to review the application.
The review is handled by either the staff liaison to the board or the board chair or nominating committee and they're just trying to see that uh your interests match up and also your qualifications match up with the requirements of the board.
That then gets sent to the mayor and I we prepare a letter of appointment she'll sign it and then the ultimate approval and vote um is done by city council.
Then the city clerk's office helps you get sworn in and sign any necessary paperwork.
So we want to encourage you to apply there is a board and commission for everyone.
Uh we definitely want people who uh want to help local government and believe in local government.
Boards and commissions work on things that Oaklanders care about whether it's libraries, um parks uh there are a number of boards that were created by voter mandates for example Measure H, uh created the Sugar Sweeten Beverage Tax Advisory Board, Measure L L created the police commission.
Uh but ultimately uh each board has its own unique set of requirements and we're really seeking folks from all sorts of uh life experiences and backgrounds to be a part of each board.
So again we encourage you to apply and if you have any questions you can always reach out to the mayor's office and myself so we hope to see you and your application uh coming in and then you'll be able to join the 300 plus team of excellent volunteers for the city of Oakland.
Welcome back to Inside City Hall where our guests this week are the bicycle and pedestrian advisory commissioners.
So in the last few segments we've been talking about we've gotten a lot of information from you all about what the commission is, why you're a part of it.
Tell us a little bit about why Oaklanders should care about your commission and know about the work that you guys are doing.
So our commission is it's a charge with really providing for Oaklanders the best and safest experience you can have either walking or biking throughout the city.
And everyone walks even if you're a driver you walk between your car and your park your parking space and like the visitor going to or the venue you're attending or the park you're checking out.
Um and in Oakland we have so many people actually that also don't have cars.
And so one of the things that's been really actually was a genesis for our commission is ensuring that we have policies that everyone in Oakland whether or not you have a car has a safe way to travel to work, to school, to a doctor's appointment, to hang out with other kids, um and through means of ensuring that not just that you have a safe path, but that you also have access to those resources.
One of the things that we've um have also been advocating for in terms of equity is ensure that there are as we see new modes of mobility coming um that we have um equal access set which I but tell us about those new modes of mobility because there are a lot.
Sure.
So one of the things we we've seen in just the last few years, that's three years it's been um you know uh companies coming in with uh new modes of travel like electric s uh first we saw shared bikes and there were shared bikes there's a program called what's now called Bay Wales which is a uh regional compact of Oakland, San Francisco, San Jose and Berkeley that have shared bikes that you can check out by the hour um and you can take them in basically between different stations.
But there's also companies that have had dockless bikes.
Um we had line bike for a while where they're and they've transitioned down to scooters and so now the big thing you see we're seeing is e-scooters and there's several venue companies that have are working with City of Oakland to get permits.
So there's Lyme, lift has a company, uh bird has a scooter and these are basically allow you with an app to check out a scooter for you know by the minute and use it to take a you know powered trip around the city so you don't have to if you're not able to catch a bus or the bus is not running very frequently your area you could use as an option or an alternative.
We're finding actually that a lot of people are using these instead of driving.
The most recent data that we saw it's like a third of the riders were instead of taking a trip in a car like you know one of these um they were actually we're using the scooters.
So we're actually it's actually a way to actually grow the access for people to get around Oakland.
So is that a trend or you are are you all seeing that as the future of um or rather I should ask you what do you see as the future of walking and wheeling in our city.
We'll we're advocating that you're advocating for more wheeling and walking in our city.
Exactly.
And what does that look like and how do how what does that look like as far as safety?
What does it look like as far as the benefits?
What does it look like as far as access?
If people are biking or doing uh are using some of the other modes of transportation other than using their cars is good for the health is good for the climate change.
We get we are in the middle of a of a climate change thing now.
And so um and it's good for the environment.
It's a good thing overall.
Yeah and I just add to that as Phoenix was saying we are in the middle of this climate emergency, you know, we need and we have a state mandate.
We are you know our states decide that we want to take a proactive step in reducing our impact on the environment, reducing our and and transportation is actually one of the biggest sources of climate change related emissions that we haven't addressed.
I mean there's been a lot of work to change building codes um but most people still drive to work.
Most people still drive for their errands and so the what we whatever we can do to make it safer for you to walk take your kids walk them to school or to walk to your neighbor grocery or to walk to Bart or walk to a bus and take a bus to work.
That will help reduce our ghost gas impacts.
And I think one of the reasons and just going back to something you asked earlier like the reason why Oaklanders should really care about our commission is that this is a venue where you you're your ta your tax dollars are paying for these services and so if you're not speaking up you're not able you may not be getting the services that you rightfully deserve.
And so we as commissioners can definitely be that voice but we also need Oaklanders to to come in and speak as well.
One thing we are seeing actually and we've heard from people as like mentioned the future mobility is that people who don't necessarily have the same financial resources um as like you know someone who's like living at the median income needs to have access to these new modes of mobility.
So we uh we've been really proud to see like the city of Oakland staff working with the commission, working with community groups um like Transform, like scraper bike team and they've you know there's now a new um mobility hub that's been created in East Oakland that will allow for individuals who can't say afford access to a scooter or to the Bay Wheel shared bikes or to a lift ride to get a um discounted access or in case a free access to that or even um be able to check out bikes for free.
Excellent.
So how do how would you encourage an Oaklander to get involved in the commission, Noelle?
Sure.
I mean, there's a bunch of different ways at different levels.
The easiest thing you can do is go to our website and look up the bicyclist and Pedestrian advisory commission and Oaklandca.gov and there's a button where you can click to subscribe to receive our agendas.
The next thing you can do is come to a meeting and you can speak during open forum.
You can speak on any of the items.
Um you can also get involved in one of the many committees of the commission.
We have a bunch of committees where commissioners and public are allowed to work together to kind of dive deeper into issues like infrastructure, legislation, policing, um, all kinds of things.
And so members of the public can sit on those committees as well.
And then I'm sorry.
Oh, and then uh the last thing that you can do is you can apply to be a commissioner, and we have um applications uh every year.
We have some new commissioners.
That's exactly what I was gonna ask you.
If someone wanted to join your c your board, how would they do that?
Well, I'll let you so there's a uh the uh commissioners are we are appointed by the mayor of Oakland.
Um so uh mayor's office, her office has a a website portal where you can apply to be a join the bicycle pedestrian advisory commission as Noel mentioned.
We do have uh all applications for new commissioners because we have term seats that are up every year.
So there are opportunities each year for uh openers to come and join the commission.
Excellent.
And all of that can be found on our website, correct?
Yes.
So if there's anything in our last few minutes, um if there's anything that you all want to add, is there anything that's very um exciting that's coming down the pike?
Is there anything about the future of our roads?
Is there anything that you a real us a a message that you'd like the public to hear about walking and wheeling in our city?
Phoenix, I think you're died to answer that question.
Oh, not in what you asked.
But how should I ask it, sir?
Well, I'm very excited about our subcommittee on police relations.
Okay.
And we just adopted a mission statement for it, and um and we now we're gonna take a a look at at um at uh detentions and arrest of bicyclists in various parts of our city, and uh and and um and then find out why those things took place.
And once we get a good feel of the data, then we would look at our st constituent group, which includes the OPD, City Council, ODOT, uh Noelle, and uh and um and other folks around the city in the communities.
And then we gotta decide how we're gonna use all this information.
Excellent.
And who and in what way?
Who gets the advice, who who we advocate with, who we just give information to, and they can do whatever they do with.
So I I'm very excited about that.
Yeah, I mean I'm definitely excited, because that's something we heard from the community members that they wanted to see our commission addressed when we were as part of the there was a two-year process to develop the bike master plan.
We went out to community folks, we were asking people, like, what's open so why aren't you riding?
Folks are saying, Well, because we feel like you might be getting harassed by the police, so it's like this is a way we can actually take development of policies and using the venue of the bike plan and of the commission to help to really improve lives for all openers and make sure that everyone feels like they have a safe access to our our streets.
Miss Noel, anything to add at the end?
I'm just gonna say that we're in changing times.
We have the climate crisis, we have a huge influx of people into our city, and I think that it's providing a great opportunity for people who care about mobility justice and who want to get more people outside walking and riding um to get involved in our work.
Um so come see what we do and and try and shape this this imminent future.
Excellent.
Well, thank you all very, very much for joining us.
Phoenix, Noelle, Kenya, thank you very much for sharing a little bit about what you do and sharing your pride.
And thank you for watching.
We enjoy sharing information about our boards and commissions so that you can find ways to be involved and make this your city and feel like you're a part of all of the decisions and the and the policies that we have here uh for our residents.
This is Inside City Hall.
I am Autumn King, and thank you for watching.
Okay.
Oh, it's a Kimberly.
Okay, yeah.
Yeah.
Yeah.
We can look at a clock, but uh we're ready to go when you are.
Good morning.
11 o'clock.
11 o'clock.
And I'll just go ahead and run through the rules of public participation really quick.
Uh thank you all for joining us today.
We asked that for those that are joining virtually that you raise your hand to speak on an item after fall.
Speakers will be given a maximum of two minutes to speak.
We will take speakers in the order that hands are raised and you will be muted until you are called on to speak.
If you call you to start going to raise your hand, star seeks to unmute yourself.
And if you were joining us in person, we ask that you fill out a speaker card and turn it in and state your name for the record before you start speaking.
Okay.
Ms.
Port Attorney.
We're gonna take the roll call.
Oh, roll call.
Yeah, roll call.
So Commissioner Myers, present.
Chair.
I'm here.
You're here.
Maybe I'm here.
We can begin.
Now we can go to Ms.
Assistant Port Attorney.
Do we have items to report out of closed session?
Chair Martinez, there were no fine actions taken in closed session today.
Thank you.
Ums Slam.
You're next.
Will you please present item 2.1?
Yes, thank you, Commissioner.
Item uh 2.1 is just for your information and public disclosure.
It's our single audit, our PFC audit, and our customer facility charge audit all in one package.
These are our compliance audits required for uh by various laws.
The single audit covers all of our federal grant spending.
We had about 43 million, I think it was 43 million, 46 million in federal grant spending last year, summarized in in this audit plan.
Our auditor is here.
If there was any questions, um, she'll be doing a report later on the status of our current audit.
This is last year's audit.
Um, but there was no findings in last year's audit, so we got a good report.
That's great.
Yeah, do we need to take any action other than the report to approve this?
On item 2.1.
And seeing that we have no speakers on the item, we can progress on to the next one.
Okay.
Yes.
Item 2.2 again is um more of an FYI.
This is our deferred compensation plan audit.
The Port of Oakland um maintains a deferred compensation plan.
It's a it's a um contribution benefit plan for our employees.
Um there's roughly 600 participants in it, about 300 active employees, 300 retirees or separated employees still participate in the plan.
Um, the plan held um 147 million in assets last year.
We're or 136 million in assets last year.
We're up to 147 million um currently.
Uh these assets belong to the employees, not to the port um and the former employees.
Um it's governed by a by a body, uh I'm the chair, our HR director is a co-chair, and then uh union representatives make up the remaining uh five to seven uh committee members who then govern the actual plan administration itself.
We meet quarterly.
Um power is our trustee or Great West operated by Empower or known as Empower, um, is our trustee and our administrator.
Um again, uh it was a clean audit.
We're very happy um about the performance of the plan so far and the auditors here if you have any questions, but um, it was also a clean report.
Okay, great.
You have any questions?
No, it's just good news to have clean clean audits.
I'm just gonna ask for speakers once again.
Chair Martinez, if there are any public speakers on item 2.2, please raise your hand again.
If there are any public speakers on item 2.2, play read please raise your hand.
We have no speaker.
Do you want to say anything?
Well, as Julie mentioned, and I'm Linda Burley, I am the engagement partner with Messius Genie and O'Connell, your auditors.
Um, as Julie mentioned, that wraps up our fiscal year 2024 deliverables.
Um, there is a follow-up letter that um will be given to you separately and probably presented to the board uh at the next meeting.
And that's just a summarization of our required communications.
However, I gave you a verbal presentation on those in January earlier this year, and there's been no changes and no changes based on the results of these reports either.
So everything is good.
Everything is good.
Yes.
Moving on to 2025.
Okay.
Great.
Thank you so much.
And do you do you have any questions?
No.
I think 2.3.
Are we on 2.3 now?
Yes.
Yes.
I will actually not be presenting item 2.3.
This but I will introduce it.
It's our audit service plan for fiscal year 2025.
Our audit is underway.
We're fielding questions and providing support to the auditors.
Maybe even as we speak.
But Linda is here to present the audit plan just so you guys know what's going on and what she's.
Thank you, Julie.
So this is an annual presentation we give to you as part of our planning procedures for the audit.
It's been a few months since we've started the audit, but just because of some of the questions in the meeting, we weren't in front of you.
But we had provided this presentation to management to put on an agenda as soon as we could.
So typically we'd probably talk to you in the summertime, but just given that that meeting was canceled, we were unable to do that.
So I want to highlight these communications for planning.
And then just there, I'll give a brief status of the audit.
So this is our scope of services.
We will continue to have, well, five deliverables, but three of those deliverables are packaged into one document.
And so we will audit the basic financial statements, which is included in the annual comprehensive financial report.
We will audit your federal expenditures, which will be included in the single audit.
We will audit your compliance with both passenger facility charge requirements as well as customer facility charge requirements and then your deferred compensation plan.
So the scope hasn't changed from the previous year.
So we communicate with you formally at least twice a year.
This is the planning communications where we discuss the scope and timing of the audit, and then we have the results, which that was what I mentioned we discussed verbally and I presented on in January.
So today we're going to go over the left side, our responsibilities, and then tell on the scope and timing of the engagement.
So there's a lot on this slide, but these are essentially our responsibilities and breaking it down when we're auditing financial statements.
So this would be the basic financial statements, the ports, financial statements, and this would also apply to your deferred compensation plan.
So our goal is your auditors to provide an opinion on the fair presentation of your financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
And we conduct our audits using or under govern a generally accepted auditing standards as well as government auditing standards.
And with government auditing standards, we're specifically considering your internal controls and compliance over financial reporting, and we do provide a separate report in addition to our opinion on the financial statements on those considerations.
To the extent that we would have any findings, whether that's material noncompliance with laws, regulations, grants, and contracts, or any findings and internal controls that rise the level of a material weakness or significant deficiency, we would report those matters to you in writing.
And so though those are our general responsibilities for the engagement.
If anything critical was to come to our attention during the engagement, we would definitely be in contact with you.
That hasn't been the case in the past, but that would be we we have communication protocols for that to ensure that you keep informed and know if there's any risks or issues that we have identified in the audit.
So this slide addresses our responsibilities for the compliance audits, and as we discussed, you have three of them.
We have the federal awards under the single audit, and then we have the passenger facility charges and customer facility charges.
So we are auditing those activities in accordance with their applicable requirements.
Single audit, we are auditing under the uniform guidance, and OMB issues an annual compliance supplement that provides direction to the auditors about what we should be looking for.
Your largest grant has been the airport improvement program.
That's the grant we selected to audit last year, and so that likely will be selected again this year, but there are some changes in some of your federal funding.
You've got a recent larger grant where you're working with your various partners that are considered sub-recipients.
So we'll eventually probably see that on the single audit as that grant gets spent down.
I don't think it's really we're gonna have it for 25, but definitely 26.
So we're looking at that.
For the others, for passenger facility charges, we audit in accordance with guidance provided by the passenger facility charge audit guide for public agencies.
This is issued by the Federal Aviation Administration.
So we design our audit to evaluate the port's compliance with those requirements, and similarly with the customer facility charges, we audit to the compliance requirements listed out in the civil and government codes, California civil and government codes of those areas or sections related to customer facility charges.
So we will provide you an opinion for all three of these on the entities' compliance.
And then again, we also consider internal controls.
So to the extent that we identify any deficiencies, we would report those to you as well.
Alright, so management's responsibility.
Management is responsible for the preparation of accurate and complete financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
They're also responsible for compliant compiling the information for the compliance audits.
So there's financial schedules that accompany each compliance audit, and those would have to be compiled as well with the thought of accuracy and completeness.
Management's also responsible to design and implement and maintain a system and internal controls to mitigate any error, any risks of fraud and errors.
Management is responsible for providing us complete information, so we have audit requests throughout the process and also unrestricted access to persons that would be important as part of the process so we can obtain appropriate evidence to fulfill our responsibilities.
And then management is also expected to be forthcoming when items are identified when they become aware of fraud errors or breakdowns in internal controls.
So these are discussions that we have.
We do ask these questions initially in our planning process, but there still is a responsibility that as you become aware of something that we need to know about as part of the audit process that does need to be communicated.
And then you, as an audit committee, you also have responsibilities for oversight over the financial reporting process and ensuring that management has established and is maintaining processes, so internal controls, programs, things like that that would prevent and detect fraud or misstatement.
And then finally, there's a joint responsibility with the audit committee and management of ensuring that you're setting proper tone in the organization to uphold ethical practices as well as compliance with laws, regulations, and completeness of disclosures.
So this is our audit timeline, and this is mirroring our contract.
And so right now we're in column three.
So we've done planning and risk assessment.
We have performed our interim procedures.
So we're working with the financial reporting team right now to conduct our year-end field work.
So this is where we have a complete trial balance, a set of financial statements, and we're going through and validating those balances to basically to support our opinion on whether or not they're presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that would also include the disclosures with the financial statements.
So our goal is always to get the statements issued by the end of November, but that hasn't been possible for a variety of reasons.
So they have dipped into the December time frame, but we're still expected to meet the timelines to be able to present to you before the end of the year.
So these financial statements, we're working on that goal to improve financial reporting.
We will get to that November date, but we'll probably be on a similar timeline where we're dipping right into December.
But we stay in contact to ensure that we keep both sides honest on what's expected as part of this process, and make sure that we we are providing proper oversight.
The first is GASBE statement number 101, which is compensated absences, and the second is 102, certain risk disclosures.
101 will have the most significant impact.
We don't expect any impact with GASBY statement number 102, but 101 changes the valuation of compensated absences, and so what's what will likely happen is as management reviews their employment agreements, there's certain things that are being drawn in and re-evaluated in terms of that valuation.
There's likely going to be a restatement of beginning net position because when you implement an accounting standard, you're also looking at what that effect was at the beginning of the year.
And so we're going through and working with them on what that analysis is and what that impact is.
But when we issue the financial statements and we come to present to you, we'll provide you more information on those particular impacts.
And so effective in October 2024 management was required to evaluate and review this compliance.
This is going to affect federal monies that were provided to a government organization either on or after that October date 2024.
And this could be, you know, additional funds on existing grants as well.
So there's going to be a bifurcation in terms of how we test and look at this information, and there will be also some additional changes in fiscal year 2026 to the audit process.
So we will we will update you on those as we get closer to planning for that.
Um there are going to be some additional accounting standards as well that management is evaluating for 2026.
So that concludes my presentation, but I'd be happy to answer any questions.
Are there any questions?
And from you okay?
Yep.
I'm okay too.
Wonderful very much.
You're really appreciate that.
If there are any uh public speakers on item 2.3, please raise your hand again.
Any public speakers on item two point three, please raise your hand.
Do we have any speakers?
And if we have any public speakers for open forum, please raise your hand.
We do not have speakers for open forum.
Can we close the meeting?
Read that final line on your screen.
It's eleven nineteen.
Eleven nineteen.
We're closing at eleven nineteen.
Okay.
I forget to look at these little notes here.
This is this is this.
It's Oaklanders on the line.
Oaklanders, we are so back for another episode.
The second to last episode of this limited series, Oaklanders on the line.
I'm your host as always, Noel California, and let's get into it.
Episode one, we got to ask people why Oakland, why they chose to be here, stay here, move here, why they defend Oakland, why they represent Oakland, just why in general.
And on this episode, I want to ask people what is Oakland.
What does it mean to them?
How do they define it?
So let's pick up the phone and get Oaklanders on the line and have them paint a picture of what the town is.
Yo, who we got on the line right now, who we listening to.
Hey, right now you're listening to Corey Johnson, aka Sunspot Jones.
How y'all doing?
Doing great, glad to have you on the line.
While I got you here, in your words, what is Oakland?
Please define it for us.
I go to place I go to Norway, I go to Germany, I go to Australia, I go to Bali, like people know Oakland.
They know the art, they know all the different things that have been created to show the world that it's it's just a magical, beautiful place and celebrational arts barrier here.
Once again, that's my brother man Corey.
He's a fellow cultural strategist in government working with the mayor's office and a resident of district eight.
Just think of 2017 Raiders versus Jets.
It's a nice Sunday afternoon.
You got Marshawn on the sideline.
You got Kick the Sneak plan in the whole stadium, and you got Marshawn turning up a whole stadium of 60,000 people in the Coliseum.
That's what Oakland is.
I feel like Oakland, you go anywhere, you see it, you smell it.
It's the art, just the sounds.
I feel like that's the real inspiration.
That's the real heart of Oakland.
And like despite all the crazy shit that go down, there's real beauty, there's real culture in Oakland that people need to put that shit on a pedestal instead of like, oh, businesses are closing down.
Oh, people bipping too much.
Like, no, you need to put the love for Oakland on a pedestal.
And Marco's right.
I'd bet you five bucks if you type in Oakland news, you'd probably find a negative article.
And while we're portrayed one way, we still find ways to thrive.
It's dynamic, it's complicated, it's risky, it's gritty, it's uh it's real.
There's a deep sense of beauty and justice that's important to how the city presents itself.
As a cultural affairs manager.
I look at like the many ways our cultural community celebrates and honors and brings booty to life.
That's Roberto.
He works in cultural affairs.
We had a conversation recently, and we both agreed that there needs to be an attempt to revitalize Oakland.
Our next resident on the line is Kev Choice.
He's a former cultural strategist in government.
Create at a high level for such a small space.
We have a wide influence around the world for such a small compact area.
Oakland is rich, culturally rich, often overlooked, often underestimated, but always continuing to grow, to grow and evolve.
It's like a mixing pot where people can come, and if you have an independent and community mindset, you can find a way to thrive.
I feel like it's a place that is often, you know, looked down on, underestimated, but we always continue to rise.
We always continue to create.
Oakland is in the class of kind of considered second tier cities.
You have your Baltimore, which would be second tier to DC.
And you have your smaller poor cities, Portland, you know, things like that.
These places are kind of forgotten, kind of isolated, kind of weird art pockets.
Oakland to me means Oakland has its own separate from those cities.
Oakland has its own very distinct sort of community soul today.
It seemed to exist in other places as much.
And he told me a lot about what he thinks Oakland is, and he believes the city can get better.
I think Oakland is that one city that can't really be described unless you experience it.
And everyone that I've ever introduced to the town has always been amazed by what they found.
Because it's never what they expected.
That's Emiliano Bia.
He's a producer, model, actor, singer.
And we met through our media line of work.
Something that I think is uniquely Oakland is a sense of community here.
Um it's the number one quality that stands out to visitors, uh, the friendliness of people in the streets, in bars, at markets and festivals, anywhere that you go that is a social place.
Oaklanders are gonna be welcoming with a smile, dancing, having a good time.
So it's just our culture here.
I think that's something that is part of our identity here growing up, and I think it's something that we want to spread to other people.
Dear Oakland, I love you for all your magic, diversity, beauty, and history.
Thank you for being home and always being there.
I'll see you at the lake.
Love and be able to because of the personal attention given every caller, you might experience a brief delay.
Please remain on the line.
This is Emiliano Villa, and you're listening to Oaklanders on the line.
The blues is something we didn't want, but that's what we got.
And in fact, it is sort of like our uh psychological outlet, release, it's the history of black people in America.
Starting from Congo Square, feel how some working out in cotton feels, begging for our lives every day.
I walk in the drive.
I don't think you can grow up in Oakland during that time period and didn't play the blues, because this is just part of the culture there.
Eugene Blackmail was magical to us.
Bob Gennings, Chicopay Decent, Jimmy McCrackman.
Fake Harold has an Oakland sound.
We have a funkiness to us.
And it's just your story of you and what you feel.
That's what the booze is.
Horns is indigenous to West Coast Blues.
Low Folsom, Jimmy McCrackland, Lewis Jordan, they all would have at least seven, eight horns.
Talking about this girl.
Blues is a blueprint of black life.
All of the joys, sorrows, the education and mis-education and sexuality.
Just the whole blueprint of life.
And it had to be expressed.
And it came from a place of hardship.
Because we were living hard.
And we had to talk about it.
Big mama showed me.
Don't get number so far.
Don't get on the show.
The Great Migration was an outpouring of six million African Americans from the South to the rest of the United States of America from the time of World War One until the 1970s.
90% of all African Americans were living in the South at the time the Great Migration began.
And that meant that 10% of all African Americans were spread out throughout the entire rest of the United States.
And this migration followed three beautifully predictable streams.
We focus on the development of West Coast blues, that wartime migration of so many cultures, Texas, Louisiana, Arkansas, and Oklahoma.
Music is probably the most significant and recognizable, instantly recognizable gift of the Great Migration.
But no, look what we did.
Our contribution is so great.
The more you research black music, the more you realize everywhere black folks go, they create a musical scene of their own.
I grew up in the country.
And once they became city people, the sounds evolved because they was evolving.
So the music starts to reflecting that.
I always call it black roots because it came really from these spirituals and singing in the fields, and that's all that you had.
All American music, especially country music, is uh black blues, is slave music from darkness from tragedy, from tragic surroundings and environments, as we even learned from hip hop, comes great art.
What the migration did was it allowed people who had been held down to in some cases within a single generation, lift themselves up to such a degree that they would actually have an indelible impact on the culture itself.
Very famous lap steel guitarist, playing the country western band.
It had helped those guys take their instruments in and in so doing.
I said, Well, could I say the end is that you guys practice session?
Uh tune-up session.
They said, sure.
That's beautiful.
And I said, when I get to be a man, I'm gonna get me one of them.
I'm gonna play it too.
He looked at me and he smiled and he said, I don't think so, son.
This is a white man's instrument, and niggas don't play them.
So, I said, I'll be the first to play one.
I'll be the best at it.
But that was an old black man that did play one.
Things LC Goodruck and Robinson, Luton Berkeley.
I played bass behind him just to learn the technique of how to play the lap steel guitar.
And I did.
And that was over 30 years ago.
And then nobody can touch me.
Charles Sullivan.
He would bring everybody in here.
Because he was a booking agent.
He would book the West Coast, period.
So he kept a lot going on here, you know.
Born around 1907, though he started with nothing, Charles Sullivan became known as the mayor of Fillmore.
When he was two, his mother signed papers that indented him as an apprentice to Robert Sullivan.
That meant Robert became the master of Charles.
He abused and beat Charles.
Charles ran away for the first time at the age of 13.
He was determined to make it to the West Coast.
Young Sullivan landed on his speed in Los Angeles and got a job washing cars.
He also ventured into the jukebox and vending machine businesses.
With his jukeboxes and black bars on both sides of the bay, Sullivan became an important player in the growing record business centered around Oakland's 7th Street.
Sullivan also became the biggest concert promoter on the West Coast.
His crew promoted shows for James Brown, Jackie Wilson, Bobby Bluebland, Ike and Tina Turner, Ray Charles, The Temptations, and a host of other international blues and RD artists.
His businesses took off after he acquired the master lease for a building on Billmore and Geary.
He named it the Villmore Auditorium.
His fortune changed on August 2nd, 1966.
He was found murdered alone by the railroad tracks in San Francisco, south of Market.
His murder is still unsolved.
Yeah, I saw B.B.
King at the film auditorium when it was a black dance hall.
Before Bill Graham was doing rock there, a uh uh black businessman named Charles Sullivan was running the place.
And me and my friend Rick were the only two white guys in the whole place.
And uh, you know, I realized there's nothing dangerous about this place.
These people are friendly.
You know, and I I felt right at home.
In fact, that's that's when I said to myself, this is where I want to be.
I want to be in the middle of all of this.
The beauty of the Great Migration was that it was a leaderless revolution.
The only way that they could get any information was if they could get their hands on one of the northern newspapers, the Chicago Defender, the Pittsburgh Courier, the Pullman Porters would drop them off in designated locations off of the side of the tracks.
This is the beauty of the network of how did they make this happen without cell phones and texting and email, and it's amazing what the human heart will do when it has a desire to be free.
For a long time I thought I was from Arkansas.
I'm on the line of Arkansas and Louisiana.
They ended up here because my father, he beat up this guy.
It was a white guy, and he was harassing his sister.
And so my dad came up and saw what was happening, and he got angry, and he beat him up.
But we knew he's gonna come back with a lot of people.
So we're gonna get out of here.
And he made his sister, she left everything.
The house, everything.
So uh he threw us all in the car, including his sister, and down the highway we went, and we stopped in Vallejo, California.
And my father told me this story over and over as a kid.
My grandmother was named Minnie, and the insurance guy came by and said, I want to two guineas to get insurance.
And he said, My children ain't no damn guineas.
She had told him, she said, you shouldn't assassinate him.
You could, Eddie, they can come back for you.
She made him leave.
They was at the train station.
Here come the clan, and they rolled up on the side of the train and said, Stop this train.
He said, We're on government rails, you can't get him.
You go find another one.
We moved to uh to Oakland right there on 8th Street behind 7th Street, which was the epicenter of the black life.
They had stores there, the movie theater was there on 7th Street.
You would see both sides of the street, businesses.
You would see people walking back and forth, both sides, all black, well dressed, very manable, happy, music, music, music.
The first African American music that I know for sure was played on 7th Street was in 1917 at a club called the Creole Cafe.
And Kid Orie and his band from New Orleans was playing there.
But it was sort of a tradition on Saturday night.
We'd get in the car, mother, dad, and the electric go down to West Oakland and do our shopping.
Because it was a drugstore, there were markets along the way, clothing stores, because these were the people that supported dad, and he made sure that he went down and supported them.
You'd see all walks of life, because don't forget they had pun shops, pool halls, record stores, Wolf Records, and Reed Records was the ticket masters of the day.
This street here had a lot of juke jumps.
Like this one place here.
This would have been nearly the Kit Kat Club or the uh uh the black girls' lounge further down, but it might have been the Rex Club, it could have been the main event.
All these clubs were on this street, and you'd go from one to the other, one to the other, one to the other, and then they'd always have a jam section.
Of course, you'd see the white and black, maritime workers, the white guys from the south.
We run in the S's orbit room to get hog balls, to get, you know, to get oxtails, to get the real southern food.
With the war came the demand for down-home blues from Texas in particular, the kind of blues that that uh the new residents had heard back home, and Bob Geddons filled that demand when he got ready to leave Texas, uh, him and a friend jumped on a prey train.
He left from Los Angeles to visit his mom up here in Oakland.
And he said he went down on 7th Street and he said, he's seen all them people down there.
He said, This is where I need to be at.
I bet I can get the blues over.
Bob Geddons built uh his own studio by hand from used parts and began recording these down home blues musicians and singers like uh Law Fulson and Casey Douglas.
Bob Gedding's style was always that gospel thing.
He didn't like a lot of fair stuff.
That's the kind of style that was popular or made it to the charts, but that's not Oakland Blues.
Oakland Blues is more jumpy with the horn thing, much more lively.
But that slow draggy Bob Gettings blues was great.
It really put Oakland on the map.
What is the blues?
Well, maybe different people got different opinions in the room, but my feeling of the blues is when you're all down and out, and yeah, woman or something, treated you wrong, and the next day, you just got that certain feeling, low down and feeling.
I call that, and it and it lagged on your mind, so I figured after blues on your mind.
I recorded my first hit record here in the Bay Area with Bob Gettings, who was producing the soul music and all that.
I brought a tape to his studio one day with the I Wanna Know hit.
And I was sitting in the studio when Sugar Pie and Pee Wee came in with a huge recording.
She said, Bob, I think I got one.
She, oh yeah.
Plug it in.
Let me hear it.
So they plugged it in.
I want to know.
Bob said.
You come back tonight.
You do a cut that sucker.
He said, and he was so funny.
My God that sounds like a heck.
Some people are born with sound in the ear.
They don't have to know, you know, not a not an inkling of music.
It's all a feel.
And this is what he had.
You know, he couldn't read A Flat and B flat, but he could feel and he could hear.
And very keenly.
And you couldn't fool him for nothing in real.
You know, if you try to say, well, no, uh, Gettings, I don't want that there.
I want to know you saw.
And he had that draw.
Oh, no, don't play that.
You know what I mean?
Really down, down home, dude.
But he knew what he wanted.
And he come across with it.
Any artist that he was produced, he would always hum the way he wanted to hear them sing it.
You know what I mean?
So it was a certain feeling and emotion that he would want to see.
He was recording Low Fulson, and he had those metal discs.
You know what I mean?
And every time Lord Pulson would hum the word the wrong way, he'd have to take that disc up, bend it up, and throw it away.
And he would be mad.
And I used to sit and laugh.
Trying to make a record.
3 o'clock jump was the first hit on Bob Gettings' label.
Blues hit the low done.
And that's what put Bob Gettings on the map.
He was able to buy a lot of new equipment and everything.
You know, sometimes I'd be playing.
I'd take off my hat.
And lay it down, and I'd look at it.
It'd be full.
And I'll take it and do it like this, so I wouldn't waste nothing.
Oh, handful of money, I wouldn't put none under my pocket.
But I'll put mine back away.
Laura was a self-taught guitarist influenced by the strains of his 90-year-old grandfather's violin.
In 1939, one of his first professional jobs was replacing Howlin Whoop in a country band led by a singer named Texas Alexander.
Soon after, Law was drafted into the military and then relocated to the Bay Area at the end of World War II.
Folsom began recording for Bob Gettings in 1946.
Folsom fans with a launch pad for many greats like Lloyd Glenn, J.
McShannon, Ray Charles, Ike Tina Turner, King Curtis, and Stanley Turn team.
In the 1990s, Lowell recorded and toured, winning several WC Handy Blues Awards.
He was inducted into the Blues Foundation Hall of Fame.
He also received two Grammy nominations and the RB Foundation Pioneer Award.
Lowell and BB are among the key architects of the new urban, sophisticated and horn-driven blues that remains popular to this day.
His legacy as a guitar player is rarely matched.
His fluid delivery up against his damping legato phrasing and attack is still studied intently by serious students of blues guitar.
Fulson's legacy floats on.
You said you want headless.
Lowell brought a kind of Oklahoma, Texas twang style guitar player to Oakland Blues.
Seventh Street was still vibrant because you could go see somebody like Lowell Folsom someplace.
And then somebody like myself who was just starting.
We worked every night someplace.
The complexion of West Oakland prior to the war was all kinds of nationalities.
The coasts were where the action was with shipbuilding with ports of embarkation for wars in the Pacific or in European theater.
So it was really promoted as your patriotic duty to see what you can create in the way of housing for war workers rather than them just living in their car or sleeping overnight in the Lincoln Theater or something.
White people would take their big old Victorian or whatever the houses they had and divide them up into apartments and uh rent to black folks while the white folks moved to East Oakland.
The Stewards had a kind of uh house that uh had a lot of room and they uh rented to a lot of people that were coming out, and I guess people got their start there and then eventually moved on.
We went to Star Belt of Missionary Baptist Church right there on Seventh and Center, where the Bart is now.
I guess my dad met the Stewards at church when he came out, and then we all lived there for a minute, and then uh eventually, my parents got their own place.
And the houses that we moved in always were related to where Dad could work.
He rented a store that would be like a small supermarket size, and with his carpentry skills, he put a partition down the middle of the store, and the shoe repair shop was here.
Mother had gone to beauty school, and the beauty shop was on the other side.
Blacks tended to support other blacks, so we had a chance to meet and know quite a few people.
West Oakland's black community in the middle decades of the 20th century developed a rich and robust entertainment culture.
It was a good time in history because there was no line of demarcation between uh professions.
You shopped with one another, the money circulated.
It was unheard of to be unemployed because you could always work for one of the merchants, but also homelessness was unheard of.
It was a phenomenal system uh that we had under segregation.
Well, the war in it, the jobs in it, and integration.
You couldn't go to the Fairmount before, but now you can.
So everybody took off to the Fairmont that used to go to Slim Jenkins, and he had to lay off some waitresses, he had to lay off a cook, you know.
And it was just a domino effect.
The cast system was formalized and uh commodified in the South, and it migrated with the people when when they uh journeyed out of the South trying to escape it.
It's about a structure of hierarchy that exists in this country.
It's a kind of a blueprint for how people are to be treated, and it's been passed down through generation for generation, and to break through that means to understand what it is and to know that it is not about how you feel about someone.
How dare anyone mistreat another person for the characteristics that they had nothing whatsoever to do with Jimmy McCracken is the most important musician to come out of the Bay Area post-World War II.
McCrackland fell under the tutoring of Walter Davis, the great blues vocalist and pianist.
After Stent in the Navy, he chose a career in entertainment and migrated to the West Coast, finally settling in Richmond, California.
He recorded for a slew of labels before associating with Bob Getting Sr.
It was with Giddens that McCrackland was the most fertile and creative.
As proof that he wrote the thrill is gone, McCracken offered a wrinkle envelope, postmarked 1948 that was mailed to himself, with the song title written on the flap of the envelope.
McCranklin claims between Lowell Fulson and himself that he is the better songwriter.
Well now they're both gone, and there's no debate.
Jimmy McCracklin died at the age of 91.
The song that was made famous by B.B.
King was written right here.
And that is the thrill is gone.
It was Bob Gettys and Roy Hawkins and Jim McCracken is the authors of that song.
He wrote that song.
My dad never made our contracts with an artist.
And BB King didn't it blew up.
It blew up.
BB King was signed to Martyr and Records in them days, and that's who my dad used to sublease to.
And look, years later, B.B.
King make the thing and make a big old hit out of it.
We don't get none.
The thrill is gone, was one of the first blues songs ever to hit the pop charts.
First.
And they give you cues.
I never know.
Why my life?
So much.
Maybe something.
Um palaya.
In Filipino, it means a bit of melon or sour fruit.
And I'm named after my father's mother.
Um, quite a name.
Someone out there at a young age and started uh singing at the theaters locally in San Francisco, you know, like the Ellis Theater.
I ran into Johnny Otis, who discovered me back in the early 50s.
And right away he liked me.
He said, You are going with me.
I said, excuse me.
And who are you?
You know what I mean?
I'm the Johnny Otis.
You know, hand guy, don't, don't do it.
Really?
He said, Yes.
I went to L.A.
and cut my first record in 1955.
First one with Johnny Otis.
And I never forget it.
He said, I tell you, you're so little.
You're just a little shooter.
And that's how I got it.
He named me right on the spot.
My first record.
Please be true, and boom diddy wah wah baby.
Never forget.
Raise your hand.
Yeah, buddy.
I said, raise it.
And when you raise it, get up.
I said get up.
And I always could control an audience.
I said control.
If I say move left, they'll move.
I say go right, they'll go.
If I say come on, they'll come.
It's just something in the way that I portrayed my talent.
I just brought him with me.
And it's the same that applies today.
Same thing.
Aaron T.
Beau Walker was a main ingredient in the Texas to Oakland Blues pipeline.
Walker and his music were transported by the Great Migration.
As a young boy, T Bone was a guide for Blind Lemon Jefferson, a street musician and father of the Texas Blues.
Jefferson mentored Walker in the Art of Blues guitar.
T Bone recorded his first release in 1929.
He was known as the father of the electric blues.
His stamp on the Oakland blues scene is simply undeniable.
You could catch his performance at Slyn Jenkins and at both of Don Barksdale's clubs, The Sportsman and The Showcase.
T-Bone was an amazing showman.
He always dressed neatly and was known for doing the splits while playing his guitar.
Bernita Walker fondly recalls tonight in 1987 that her dad received his induction into the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame.
She remembers Chuck Berry claiming his own stage antics came from T Bone Walker.
And then as far as he was concerned, T Bone Walker was the greatest entertainer of all time.
In 1975, at the age of 64, T Bone left the earth way too soon.
His style of guitar licks is still being copied all over the world.
When they came here to California, when they came here to Oakland, they were met with tremendous resistance.
And this resistance came in the form of often violence when they saw to move into a neighborhood that was outside the prescribed places assigned to them in each of these cities.
They were met with restrictive covenants, which meant that uh white homeowners were forbidden to sell to them even if they were so inclined to sell to them.
It was written into the very deeds of the property.
And then there was redlining, which meant that the government would not permit loans in the places where African Americans lived.
Will the new black migrants have access to jobs?
Will they have access to housing?
Will they have access to politics?
These were formal walls that were created to restrict African Americans from owning homes to be able to build wealth that other Americans were permitted to do.
And wealth does not mean that you were rich.
Wealth just means what assets, what resources do you have to call upon for the development of your family and your family's health.
We still live with the effects of that to this day.
Most opportunities have in the United States been racialized in the 20th century.
That's simply a fact.
He played with Hannah James, T-Bone Walker, and everybody else, you know, because he's gonna go back to the beginning.
And he had a great band.
He probably had one of the greatest bands that ever come out of Oakland.
We started playing at the place called the Shaq.
It's in Russell City, and it's all hogs and pigs out there.
And the shack, it was a nightclub, but I guess what they call a real old, old juke joint.
When the sun shine, the sun comes right through the woods and it would rain red on us while we were playing.
It was one way in and one way out.
You go down and it was a nicer curve, stucco and all that.
We weren't old enough to get in there.
We told him we were playing down at the shack.
Johnny Tower was playing.
Man.
Wow, this guy.
That's how I met him.
I won a talent show at the Oakland Auditorium.
And part of the prize was to be able to sing with a professional band and a professional club.
The band was Johnny Talbot and the things.
And the venue was the side door at Zanzibar, California Hotel.
So that's how I got started.
I started adding a horn player like every six months.
So I had a like almost an orchestra.
And I mean, boom.
It was only one person in my way.
And that was Johnny Talent.
You know, like in the fight sports.
He was the reigning champion.
I had to give it to him.
The blues man can tell you a story.
And in the old days, he'd tell you a story, and the song may break down and go one direction and come right back.
Nowadays, a great blues man could tell you a story, and then the song would go through eight chord changes and then come back and then have a rap breakdown and then come back and then he'd tell you the same story.
So uh the blues evolved into folk because the music that backed up these stories evolved.
The blues uh it was a natural development, and a lot of people mistake the blues as something easy that you can do easily.
But to play the eight-bar blues, the country blues and the twelve-bar blues, which is the city blues, they added one more four-part chorus to the city.
So you got a problem, you state the problem.
You state it again in the second chorus.
Last four bars is the solution.
It's a very vital part.
It's uh natural folk art spread around the world.
Willie May, Big Mama Thornton.
She was born in Orton, Alabama in 1926.
She began singing in church, but her mom was a gospel singer and her dad was a preacher.
In 1950, Big Mama Thornton recorded her first record as a member of the Harlan Stars.
She signed a contract with Peacock Records where she cut several singles.
Well, on the road with the Johnny Otis show, Big Mama cut a song that was handwritten on a paper bag called Houndo.
Big Mama tweaked it lyrically while the Johnny Otis band tweaked it rhythmically.
The song shot to number one on the RB charts and stayed for seven weeks.
It was the biggest hit of her career.
She was paid a minimal fee for her efforts, and she never received a penny in royalties.
Her career had many additional highs and lows.
Toward the end of the 1950s, Big Mama moved to the Bay Area and settled in Oakland.
She played on 7th Street and all over the West Coast.
One of Big Mama's finest career moments was playing at Carnegie Hall, performing with the Count Basie Orchestra, and John Hammond's Spirituals to Swing Concerts.
Big Mama played her last concert at the Julia Morgan Theater in Berkeley.
Although she was ill and used to Walker.
She was still feisty and had a disruptive patron toss from the venue.
She completed this show with a resounding approval from her audience.
Our Big Mama died that same year in Los Angeles, and it's remembered as one of the finest blues performers of all time.
When I first went to Europe, it was with Big Mama Thornton.
And the first concert we played was at a beautiful hall in Baden Baden, Germany.
And Big Mama started to sing and definitely quiet.
I mean, it was so quiet.
I started looking around.
What's going on?
And once she completed Thunder Salvation.
And of course, on the tour, it was Big Mama, Buddy Guy, Jonathan Lee Hooker, Fred McDowell, Freddie B.
Lo.
And they were like close to the fathers.
You know, we're often asked, how is it overseas versus versus performing here?
When we come to Europe, they're hearing artists did art singing in their language.
And they appreciate what we do.
When we get back home, it's like, yeah, well, no, so-and-so does the blues.
So does 40 other people.
I went from being uh like a child prodigy to actually playing a club and from playing a little club in my little hometown to playing in Oakland.
And Oakland was like New York to me.
I actually got the job at Glide, and I was really only supposed to be at Glide for two weeks.
And then I ended up doing it for 35 years, Paul Reed, uh Reeds Records was the promoter of gospel music at the Oakland Auditorium.
Everybody who was great, they were able to showcase.
I love the way it made me feel.
There's certain chords, but the ones that made me feel so happy, so beautiful.
Why did they come here to sing to us?
Because we needed home to come where we were because we had migrated here.
It was like visiting somebody in jail.
You brought the you bought the cookies, you brought the sandwich.
The phrasing and those notes make you cry, they can make you happy.
The sacred and the secular, it's not as divided in our community as it is in Mo's.
That's why they sold out when they came here, because they brought home back to us.
Blues is the genesis.
Omar Sharif was born David Alexander Elam on March 10th, 1938 in Shreveport, Louisiana.
His family settled in Marshall, Texas, while he was still an infant.
Marshall, Texas, claims to be the birthplace of the Boogie Woody.
Though Dave Alexander's dad was a piano player, Dave was largely self-taught because his mother insisted that he play in church.
In 1957, after two years in the military, the Texas Oakland Blues pipeline shuttled Alexander to Oakland.
And for 10 years he toiled tirelessly in Oakland area clubs.
He first recorded in 1968 on the World Pacific label on a compilation album entitled Oakland Blues.
Omar, in the company of such greats as Albert Collins, LC Goodrockin' Robinson, and Lafayette Thing Thomas, with tracks arranged and directed by Jimmy McCracklin, helped create a highly regarded collector's item that has become a prime example of Oakland blues.
His first recording under Omar Sharif was the critically acclaimed The Raven, released in 1991.
It streams the essence of a powerful blues statement.
Dissonant jazz chords, T-Bone Walker's hesitation mix, and it incorporates painfully poignant lyrics.
Omar Sharif with the gifted brilliance blends blues, jazz, classical, and other distinct styles to his politically charged lyrics.
Along with the smooth grace of Charles Brown, Alexander sets the standard for blues piano on 7th Street.
Well, my family, my father, and us were living in West Oakland, across from a school called Durant.
And one day on a Saturday, um, we heard something outside.
It was, I guess it was music because in 55, you know, TVs and radios and all we didn't have that.
So we went outside and it was a band playing.
Never seen nothing like that.
Never in my life.
Didn't know what a guitar was, didn't know what drums were.
It was Larry Graham, Dale Hart, and Eugene Blackmail.
Well, Larry had electric guitar, and Eugene Blackmail was in the background.
He had an acoustical guitar, and they had all that uh everybody else had uh electrified instruments and I I mean, that was it.
I my father came home.
My brother and I said, Well, we wanna play, and he said, No.
So, what I did was, um, I was in seventh grade.
I made a guitar in Woodshop.
The instructor in their class, he got into it, he cut out the shape of a guitar, and then he helped me put breaths on there and all that.
When my father came home, I showed him I got a guitar.
Then he knew I really wanted to play.
And so then he uh he took me and bought a guitar, but I wasn't able to let Larry had a it's called the Supero, and I threw away the one I made.
I grret that every time I think about it.
I'm a product of Oakland, even though I was born in Texas and at McClamen's, we had a music teacher who was we considered a genius.
Almost everybody he touched did well in the music field.
Mr.
Penn.
Heard of him.
He was a great music teacher, and I would go to him and ask him, show me a line, and he'll show it to me, and then we'd be playing someplace.
And all the bass players in the club run up to me.
Show me what you did.
Show me what that was, and stuff like that.
And I used to depend on him.
The school we went to, the teachers and the counselors encouraged you to do your best.
You know?
And uh I get sentimental.
Give me a minute.
And and they um always tell you, don't settle for less.
And uh that carried me a long way.
I played drums, drum kit exclusively.
Uh, born and raised in Oakland, and I started playing in clubs at about 13 or 14.
I played with various musicians who are no longer with us, Eddie Foster, Bobby Forte, Claude High.
I played with Miss Fake Arrow.
And uh I played a Don Barksdale's Sportsman's Club.
The Whispers came up from Los Angeles.
We played, we backed the whispers up, uh, Dobie Gray, he made a hit called I'm in with the In Crowd, and O V Wright.
He was a soul singer from the South.
I'm a from a jazz background, but jazz musicians know how to play the blues.
And uh, you have to because people ask you, say, oh, after you play all that jazz, all that fancy stuff, can y'all play some blues?
You know, that's what we guess.
So I know what the blues is, and I know how it goes, right?
My baby went to Sweet Jimmy's one Friday night.
All of a sudden, there was a fight.
Somebody walked up and grabbed her from my pulled out a razor and cut him 20 times my baby.
I was just telling Delhart, how I would, I was in high school, and he was playing at a club in East Oakland called Al's House of Smiles, and we used to, the back door used to be open with a screen on it.
So I'd be you'd have to go around this dark alley like you could see in the club and listen, but you could go through the screen, and the steps led right up to the stage.
They had a stage that was above the bar.
So I I would go up those steps, and Eugene and Dale Harding and they'd be up there playing, and they'd always let me play the last song.
I'd sit there all night.
We would watch these cats that were out there doing it, like the ballards and Eddie Foster and Johnny Talbot's band.
Matter of fact, we named our first band D Emeralds, because Johnny it was Johnny Talbot and D Thang.
But Ron, Ron Wells, I first time I saw him, we were at a talent show at the Oakland Auditorium, and it was Gene Blacknail and his band, Johnny Brown, all the cats was in the band.
They were backing up uh Joe Simon.
And I mean, they were killing.
But before they went on, we were just back there watching the cats.
And Ron Wells was sitting on the drums.
He was just backstage playing with him before they went on.
He wasn't a drummer in the band at the time.
But he, you know, these were all his homies.
I said, who was that cat?
That was my first time seeing you, man.
My first time.
Telling you in the Oakland Auditorium Theater.
Right, right.
So these cats are like, you know, role models for me.
You know, these cats were out there doing it, making records, and we had a community here where even though we had the national artists like James Brown, Bobby Bland, B.B.
King, all these cats coming through the area.
Um, Lou Rawls would be at the showcase, or the sportsman, Argentina Turner, the the uh Impressions, Curtis Mayfield and the Impression.
We had all that going on, but then we had a community that was amazing, like the ballads, like Faye Carroll, Johnny Calvin and the Thing, D Thangs, and all these Eddie Foster, Marvin, Marvin Holmes, yeah, Fred Hughes.
Freddie is probably for my estimation, one of the most incredibly emotional voices, phenomenal voices that ever came out of the Bay Area that should have actually been an international voice.
Listen to that song Sharing that was that I wrote that the Vitamin album.
I haven't seen anybody since Fred that that could sing as good as Fred.
I know that you could be a walking down the street and find the treasure.
And sign to me, the world you see you feel.
Sanging in church, and uh I was with uh Edwin Hawkins.
And uh his sister Fetty and Carol Hawkins.
It uh left and went his way, and I continued to try and sing.
So I noticed that there's a whole lot of good singers in the church.
So, you know, it wasn't no way.
It's a way to rehearse and learn your craft, but it's not a place to get paid properly.
A lot of folks didn't particularly like me because I sang high, and I didn't, I had a gospel friend.
What I want to tell you about Fred.
Out of all of the singers that come out of Oakland, I'm talking about everybody.
He is a guy.
You know, you talk about he got a good, he's got a good voice.
But when he was a kid, he was unbelievable.
I sung hard and I sang.
I had a I had a lot of range, you know.
Just share friends, what it's song about.
I learned how to produce records through Norman Connors.
I was there through his whole career.
Matter of fact, he had a roommates in New York.
Norman was like a conduit.
He had this record deal, and uh he was able to go into the community and bring all these incredible talents, Phyllis Hyman, Michael Henderson, and and record them.
We both told each other when we were starving to death in New York that if either one of us made it, we would pull the other one.
So when he his record with Plantin, he got me a record deal with Buddha Records.
He named my band Vitamin E.
And um, I got Freddie Hughes, Lady Bianca, David Gardner, those are my singers.
I'm about to sing, I'm love's unknown soldier, fighting for her.
But that girl just won't see me, and it's cheering me.
My most famous song probably would be As You A With Phyllis Hyman.
I think a lot of people had a misconceptions about um my writing because it later on.
People say, Well, you you never write about love or nothing like that.
Because I create music, uh, probably different than a lot of other people do.
And at first, when I started back in the uh early 60s, not being able to go to school or for music or anything.
I you just go by what you hear on the radio, and I met a guy named uh Eddie Foster.
Probably one of the baddest guitar players in the world.
I mean, you include include him with George Benson, and he was from Oakland.
I would go and I'd practically uh be sleeping on his porch.
And he said, Oh man, come on in, nicest guy in the world.
And so he started teaching me.
I never even thought about if people like what I did.
I always recorded um what I felt.
My whole thing is drums and percussion.
I played all of it.
Conga, timbalas, bata drums, the whole bit.
I studied it.
I really started with the Escovito family.
Pete me.
And they they took me under their wings and taught me that.
Okay.
And from there, I went into the exploring the funk part of the music.
That's why we had the Oakland funk machine.
And after that, years of that and the whole bit, I got that together, I started exploring jazz.
That's when I met Cal J.
Then I played with Cal J.
Then I played with everybody that came through Oakland.
Through that, I developed my own style of playing.
I had a combination of the funk, the Latin, the jazz.
I'll mute before we play.
What will we do?
Welcome to the live, what we have.
Just to give people.
I wanted to be different.
I wanted to call myself the disciple of the blues.
So I had to sit down and think about what would a disciple look like if he wanted to call himself this.
So I figured, well, he'd put a turban on his head and a fake jewel right in front of it.
And I wore that for about five years until people started saying the wrong things about me and doing the wrong thing.
I remember when I took it off, I was playing at the place in Calgary, Alberta.
We had finished playing that evening, and three guys came out and had guns on me and said I was a terrorist.
I wasn't afraid of, you know, but I looked at Matthias in my eyes.
You guys just came in with dancing to my music.
I said, the only accent that I have is my southern accent that I speak with.
This is a costume.
I said, if you want to kill me, go ahead.
And they looked at one another.
Put the guns up, walked away.
We started out doing gospel, and then we made a transition into the blues.
And from that we uh got a lot of recognition around the Bay Area.
We uh came from an era where everything was done live in the radio stations.
Uh my father and them were singing live in um uh radio station called K R E in Berkeley.
We were absorbing everything from him and their group, uh, because they had a very nice group called uh the Golden West Singers.
As I got older, then I I got bold enough to sing by myself.
And so my father finally he heard me sing, and he says, Oh Robert, you can sing like that.
My dad always taught us to sing from our gut and not sing from the throat.
It was kind of like a training whereas if you're gonna do a song, you gotta sing the song from your heart.
So we'd be in a heartfield.
We had to sing, you know what I'm saying?
So that's that's what we did.
We sang.
Music is a story.
It comes from what a person goes through a lot of times, or what they're going through.
The world doesn't get a picture of what's going on with a person or where he comes from, unless we tell it through music.
Don Barkstell was a former NBA basketball player, who opened up uh showcase and the sportsman club.
Eddie James played there, Rue Rawl, Low Willie John, Bobby Blue Bland, uh Bobby Freeman.
Friend of mine uh suggested that I go down to the showcase lounge because they had a talent show on Thursday, and so I went down there and I sang on the uh talent show, and then I won.
And I think you get like 25 bucks, and I was in college, and so it was like 25 bucks in college back in the in the 60s was a lot of money.
And so um I started going every every week.
At that time, the radio stations they played all types of music, and Oakland was a big blues town, and so I'm listening to that on the radio, so I was influenced by not only gospel but blues or country music.
My mother was a big country music fan.
We had what was known as black Radio in every neighborhood.
KDIA was on the radio all day long.
If you went in a club and you were singing or doing entertaining, the audience would know your songs better than you.
Because we listened to the radio all day long.
KDA was an interesting uh radio station.
I mean, you'd be listening to music all of a sudden uh Barbara Ann Jones, your mama said you better be home in fifteen minutes, so you're gonna get a whooping, you know.
It was that kind of thing, it was a community-oriented PSOL, and places that play basically black music, uh, they started switching it over, and uh it kind of feeded the blues completely, yeah.
Uh, you know, they just decided there wasn't a big enough audience anymore.
The East Bay was as segregated racially in terms of its neighborhoods and housing markets as any American city.
Oakland is a city of beautiful homes and views, a fine place for living, working, and raising children.
But in Oakland's future, as in all larger cities, there is an internal threat, the cancer of housing decay.
Here, the speckled stuff is the residential neighborhoods, and so these are the two neighborhoods that the post office took out.
But all that that mid-century rhetoric about newer, better, finer, and really nobody with designs on cleaning up the neighborhood much looked beyond the Cypress Freeway for 50 years.
Big city panned in budget, made Bart knockout, made the post office knock out 500 homes, and they had villages on every side, low income.
But when it came, they gave them four or five thousand a move.
So everybody started leaving West Oakland.
The houses were demolished by Abdo Allen's demolition company, and the way he was able to be the low bidder was he had a World War II surplus tank.
There are photos of him just driving into these little raised basement cottages, poof, and when the dust clears, he climbs out of the tank and waves.
Now you might say all of these things are necessary for an urban infrastructure, they're necessary for the fabric of a city, and that's quite true.
But the question is how are they located?
Where are they located?
What happens to the people who live in the places and spaces where they're located, and that's where I think we have to say that race was an enormous factor in disadvantaging people in West Oakland.
And they would dream that the city could say you gotta move.
When my father and mother work hard, and then they have and then you know, my mother was upset about what they offered them because she wasn't gonna move.
The decades after World War II are about creating fairness in these markets.
So you hear the terms like fair employment, fair housing.
These are all objectives of black politicians and the black community, but they don't open quickly, they don't open entirely.
There are enormous political fights about making it happen.
The civil rights struggle, Jim Crow, all that we have gone through touches me so very deeply.
And if they're killing people in the streets, to me, it's just a modern day lynching, and there's been things going on that we did not know about at the time was not publicized, but the people who it was happening to actually knew it, but they couldn't bring it to justice, black bodies swinging, and the sun.
Fruit hanging.
From love.
Billy Holiday sang this song.
And she defied everybody by singing it, which I thought was so brave and so beautiful.
And the song speaks of such a truth that I just want the feeling of that song.
When you say fruit, you're not talking about a nectarine.
You're not talking about a plum.
When you say fruit that's hanging from a tree, you're talking about a human being.
To me, that's just I to this moment.
And describing you what it makes me feel like.
You have people like C.L.
Dellums, who was the head of the Brotherhood of Sleeping Car Porters Union in West Oakland.
We heard a lot about him, our family, and then those that are around us, because of the Pullman Porters.
I remember him so well.
Byron Rumford, who was a pharmacist, lived in South Berkeley.
He was working very hard into the legislature to uh to get rights in the area of property.
And it's really the working together in the East Bay Democratic Party in the 1940s and 1950s.
That's really the origin of what we might call the kind of black political capacity.
The 1960s and 1970s generation is one might say more complicated generation.
Paul Cobb, I knew when he was a high school kid, Elijah Turner.
I remember Edith Austin.
They were all part of that group of us that would meet together and talk about strategies and agree to lead some kind of movement.
In 1967, when the Black Panther Party marched into the state capitol building in Sacramento, that was on May 2nd, 1967.
That was the same day Aretha Franklin's Respect was released.
At the end of that day, you'd watch on the news these brothers with guns walking in the state capitol building, and then you turn on your radio and you're hearing R E S P-E-C-T.
And you're getting this whole experience.
1967, I had a record called Believe in Me, Baby.
It was about the fast life.
And as I was singing this song, I just started saying things.
And the more I said about that lifestyle, the crowd would holler and scream, you know, every time I would say something.
We was on the show with the whispers.
And you know, the girls all screaming for the whispers.
So this guy comes back.
He said, I'd like to sign you to a contract.
I said, wait a minute.
I said, how come you're not trying to sign the whispers?
All the women are screaming for them.
He said, I never will forget this.
He said, there are five headaches.
You're only one.
In the late 60s, I think 69.
My neighbor there was a mailman, and he was like, Well, what are you gonna do a show?
And I was like, Well, I'm gonna have a band.
So he's like, Oh, well, I do a little managing, and I've got a band that lives in uh Fremont called the Motown Soul Band.
He says, I'm gonna take you out there and hook you up with them.
So I rehearsed with him for a couple times, and then nothing never really happened.
And the only person that was here was uh in Oakland was Larry Graham.
And I just kept saying, if only I could meet Larry Graham, I know that that's my ticket to success.
So I went to Saul Zance, who was the owner of Fantasy Records, I asked him to release me from Fantasy Records.
He wanted to know why I said I just want to be unencumbered.
So I wanted to make sure that when I met Larry Graham, if I ever got a chance to that I was like, I'm free, whatever you want to do with me, let's do it.
And then I would be going to places in Oakland, I go to a club, I said, and somewhere in conversation, oh Larry Graham just left here.
Then I'd go to a party, they say, Oh man, Larry Graham was here.
I said, oh my god, I'm I'm like snake bitten, right?
And so I'm driving down the street one Saturday, and who do I see in the middle of the street with his hood up?
His car had cocked out, was Larry Graham.
So I stopped and I help him get his car started, and then I, you know, while we're doing that, I'm telling him, hey, I'm my name's Lenny, and I'm a singer and whatever.
And he's like, Well, come up to my house tonight, we're gonna be jamming, you know, Neil Sean from Journey and different people gonna be over there.
We're gonna be hanging out.
So I go up, and then I'm on my way up there, and then my home training kicks in.
I stop and get a bottle of wine.
And then I walk in and I give it to him.
He says, Man, I invite people to my house all the time, and you're the first one that ever brought something.
And so then we became fast friends.
The next thing I know, and we started writing music, and and then, you know, hooked up with uh Tower Power through him.
Well, how I started singing, my mother sang in church.
They would broadcast from the church.
And on Sunday night, we would all gather around the radio and listen to my mother.
I didn't miss it for the world.
You know, so she used to pack us all up, take us to church every Sunday.
And that's where I met uh Slash Stone.
His family went to, we all went to the same church.
I asked Sly one day to be a part of my band.
He did, and we started playing around town.
We had a group called uh Royal Aces, five guys.
John Turk was in it.
Also, and at school, we were very popular.
I mean, they loved us at school, really.
I I became president of the school because I could sing.
I'm not trying to be funny, honey.
All day long, you've been talking on the telephone.
Bragging to all the friends about the furniture in our home.
But you don't tell them that I'm the one doing it all.
Wow, you're out there living it up and having yourself.
I can do that by myself.
I hooked up with Larry Graham.
Larry's like, we need to put some horns on this stuff.
So he said, I'm gonna get this band Tower Power to come over and put some horns.
So when they came through the door, I'm like, oh, these are the kids from the Motown soul band.
So we kind of like uh hooked up again.
And I always tell the joke about that when they wrote So Very Hard to Go, they called me at late at night and they had a ritual, you know, when they wanted to write something really, really soulful.
They'd go down to Everton Jones or Flint's and get some barbecue.
We're gonna get some red soda water like they do in Texas, and we're gonna go back in the back room and close the shades and roll up one of those little skinny white cigarettes and smoke that, and then now we're ready to write a hit.
And so I said, they call me about three o'clock in the morning.
Man, we wrote this great song.
I'm like, okay, I'll hear it tomorrow.
No, no, no, no, no, man.
We we went and got the barbecue, we we drank the red soda water, we we smoked that little white cigarette.
This is a hit.
So I walk in the door and bam, you know, so very hard to go.
Now we did this song back in 1973.
Had a dance called the church.
The guys in Tower Power love the RB, you know, black music sound, uh soulful music, funky music, and uh they came out and, you know, they they lived it, and then they wrote the songs, and the songs are authentic because they are who they say they are.
They are fronteteers.
My father recognized Bay Area artists and entertainers, and he did that for 39 years in something called the Top Star Awards.
We won the very first Top Star Award trophy over everybody, the Pointing Sisters, Larry Graham, Whispers, the Ballads, all those people.
He was responsible for a lot of those entertainers getting jobs.
I met Jay in 73.
When I first started with Castle Well, I met Jay at a club called Sweet Jimmy's.
Jay was the master of ceremonies.
He was a hoofer.
He'd traveled over the world.
He was the consummate MC.
He was the one that guided me through my career.
If it wasn't for Jay, I can guarantee you, I probably wouldn't have had, still have over 40 some years in this business.
The energy in the street was changing.
The most important black entertainer at the time was James Brown, who was the hardest working man in show business.
He played every night.
He quickly got the pulse of the community he was in.
So he would push his band a little further.
Give me a little more of that.
That thing you do over there, put that in there.
Play that down.
Give me some.
The main objective was to get over at the Apollo.
If you could get over there, you could get over anywhere.
And I got over there.
That's when James Brown discovered me.
Girl, I gotta have you.
So what are you talking about?
You have me.
What do you say?
He said, I want you.
Say, doing what?
You opened my show.
I said, hmm.
Okay.
And that's what we did.
And they had these balconies way up there.
I'd be way up there hanging upside down on the balcony.
What?
And then that's when they name me, that's the Native Games.
James Brown himself went through a break with his record company and just started writing music on another label, completely illegal.
But if you're a badass, that's what you do.
And he went in the studio in 1965 in February, right around the time Malcolm was killed.
And he brought in Jimmy Nolan, this rhythm guitarist out here in the Bay Area.
And they laid down a new lick called Papa's Got a Brand New Bag.
It didn't go the way most songs went.
Most songs were written where you kind of stomp your foot on the one and the three and you clap your hands on the two and the four.
And that's how most Western music has been made.
And James Brown got his band to put it more of an emphasis on the one.
Ugh.
Ugh.
So even if you're still sort of clapping on the two and the four, boom, two, three, four, boom, two, three, four.
You're bumping on the one.
And you're sort of hearing melodies that are Western and a traditional way of making music.
But you're you're bumping in a place where you haven't bumped before.
In the 1960s, the really the decade of grassroots activism, you see a resurgence of local politics.
It's in that context, the emergence of the Black Panther Party in West Oakland is so crucial.
They provided a lot of things that I needed to know about me.
And then they had to programs feeding the kids, and you know, which was a good thing.
He had influence on all of us.
We were just trying to live and have a better life.
My mom would catch me at center us off of 64th and East 14th.
I didn't know that that was the Black Panther zone, but they would let us rehearse.
And if one of my buddies or me or whatever did something wrong, which we usually did, so payting on the wall or doing something or food fight, oh, they would check us to the 20th power.
But they also allowed us to develop our skill.
The Black Panthers are known for their um advocacy of self-defense, which had not been possible for African Americans in the South.
I mean, they could not really defend themselves against the attacks, the night riders and the lynchings and such in the South.
But you know, of course, the Black Panthers were about so much more than that.
We want the political to control the destiny of our black community.
The Black Panther Party had yet a different way of thinking about survival, and for them, it literally meant looking after the poorest, the least advantaged in the community on almost a literal survival kind of level.
The idea of course was not simply to provide for the community, but to dramatize the uh the racial segregation and racism that had created uh such intense poverty.
Listen, y'all.
Yes, this is good.
Oakland Blues turns into Oakland Funk because things got a little bit too heavy.
Funk is just some heavier blues once you put it on the one.
And then an Oakland artists took it from there.
It's the evolution of the blues.
And when I say evolution, moving to that next step, because we talk about uh Johnny Talbot, Marvin Holmes.
They were sort of the second generation.
The best example we get is what Herbie Hancock was doing with the headhunters.
The sound of Herbie Hancock was an Oakland funk sound.
Combination of jazz, little taste of Latin and Funk.
Started right here and opened the head on us.
And the song Chameleon features this thumping ascending bass line that feels and sounds like a loop.
What Herbie did was to come in from the jazz world and then lay down a locked-in sequence of a heavy Larry Graham bass line that changed the way bass has been played in American music to this day.
And most musicians know this.
They know Larry Graham, the bass player in Slime and Family Stone is an entity above and beyond.
I'm amazed that if I go someplace and they say Lady Bianca's here, people know who I am, and it's like, what?
How did that happen?
I don't think someone may be strong enough.
Survivors like Eddie James, you didn't tell Eddie James, she ran her band.
Fit Carol.
There's a strength in her.
Sugar by DeSanto, you know there's a strength in her.
Ruth Brown was a strong person.
Johnny Washington was strong.
Billy Holiday, strong.
But if you didn't have the strength to get through it, it was hard.
It was so hard.
I don't know really how I survived.
I think you have to have a strong backup too.
Male background, too.
Somebody that can help you sing.
Let us sing.
Let her play piano.
I had to burst through.
That's why I started to fight back.
Because most of the male figures were, were reluctant to let me get out.
Because once I got that microphone, you did what I said, you did it right.
And they thought I was a little bit aggressive.
Because I was as tough as they were.
Well, you just, oh no, I don't.
Well, you oh no, I don't.
You know what I'm saying?
It's not like that, it's gonna be like this.
Okay.
Okay.
I'm very convincing.
Don't make me mad.
Uh-uh.
Don't do that.
I got along pretty good with everybody.
Somehow there are people that still come and sit in them seats.
I journey on.
But it's uh uphill journey.
I've been your slave.
Every sits, I've been your baby.
But before I be a dog, I would have seen you in your garage.
This go happened.
And we all kind of cracked up and said, Well, nobody's gonna really pay to go and see somebody spin a record when they could spin a record at home.
It's the beginning of a displacement of musicians, and it's also the creation of DJ-driven culture.
You didn't have to absorb the cause of the band.
Eventually, security became your greatest expenditure.
Then around that time, Oakland bass hip hop emerged.
With two short, ironically, MC Hammer, whose styles could not have been more different, and yet they're both funk-based.
We had a lot to pull from.
You know, you see Santana jamming in the park.
You see Larry Graham, you know, in jam sessions.
Bay Area's been centered on the folk from the beginning.
And it's just a question of who you're gonna ask, who's gonna tell that story?
I remember Council Mark when outside in the courtyard, Graham Central Station came out, and you know, sometimes we would jam out there in the stage, and when they came out, and they came on that stage and they used our instruments, and the way David Don and I made my less Paul sign was like, well, damn, it can go like that.
I sued the Oakland police department because I used the garage which was across the street for my entire 16 years that I was at Jeffrey's Inner Circle.
And a police officer went to the owners of the garage and said, a shooting had occurred in the garage while I was renting it.
Did a shooting occur?
No.
The garage management said, if we had known that this had not occurred, we wouldn't have taken away his right.
And then Oakland wage war on black clubs systematically for uh such clubs.
I remember got raided in one night.
The Oasis, our Simonas, the Air Lounge, and the Oyster Reef.
Harassment to the point where the landlord doesn't renew your lease.
And with Arsimonas, you would think that they would have had a tenant.
And that's why they put you up.
It's still unoccupied.
You say, whoa, damn, talking about willful.
Cabaret licenses, the way they've been issued, and the pressure that they put on black owners, it's brutal.
I don't know what what it was Jerry Brown decided to do, but he started taking away these people's license.
Well, have live music.
White clubs, they get them overnight.
Liquor licenses are expedited in an unprecedented fashion.
It's used selectively to design African Americans out.
It ended in the 1970s when there was no further reason to be escaping.
Only to find that by then, the concentrations of African Americans in these northern and western cities would end up attracting the kind of hostility that would carry forth today, and what we see is police brutality, extreme hyper segregation in the cities that the people fled to, disparities in unemployment and in housing in every sphere of life now uh uh accruing to the places where the people had fled.
That is what has happened.
You know, a lot of people ask me, why didn't you just sing RB or something?
Yeah, I guess I'm just stubborn because I didn't I never thought about if I can make money if I do this.
I've never been that kind of person.
That wasn't my intention at all.
I just need to express myself.
It's the legacy I want to leave, my music.
Whatever it does, and that's what it does.
I'm not, you know, I don't know what it'll do.
It takes on life of his own.
So I respect that.
I'll be a pupil, man.
The interns that I have work with me.
They'll be playing something, and I'll play it.
They'll be like, Where'd you get that from?
And I'm playing it, like, that's Suggy Otis.
No, that's I was like, no, see?
That's the Baloo's guitars that, you know, the Brothers Johnson's got strawberry letter 23 from, and he never got famous, but you know, you have to introduce them to this information.
It's up to the current generation now to find new ways, new tools are that are relevant to our day now to make those dreams and goals of equality come true.
You know, a lot of people think of this as history till they turn on the news.
I play on a 1973 Findle Coronado guitar.
This happened to be the guitar I was in the studio with when I had that altercation with the police officer.
That guitar has been like my shield.
From the time that we came out with the Tonies, I guess I've had been off the scene in Oakland and not around certain things.
So when that happened to me, you know, now I'm a grown man.
I'm on money, I'll pay taxes, all this type of stuff.
And here's a gentleman that just opens his car, my car door and start choking.
I was just coming from the studio working with India Iree, working on her first release, and that happens.
I just really felt like I had to lay the message out there because I was a person that had a voice.
So if you say we want to design African Americans out, and that is the policy, then what you're giving away is the richest culture that is known to any city in the country.
Anybody else would be heroifying Joe Morgan and having signs all over the airport saying the home of, but we ignore it.
My brother died at 14 years old.
I told the spirit that I would never forget him.
My mother had to bury her son.
This is just pervasive in communities of color.
That these women are the strength.
And they too often bury their own children.
So that was one song that I thought I can I have to do this song.
And no one knows really who wrote it.
It's come, you know, from the time of slavery.
But Leadbelly, he made it uh popular.
I wanted to make it lyrically relevant to today, and some of the things we're going through, and the really dedicated to these women who bury their children.
And the policeman shot it down.
Where will you go?
In the pines, in the pines with the sun, don't shine.
I shall hold night.
The things that are happening to us now, the music is gonna reflect it.
And certainly the pain and suffering won't go anywhere, so there'll be a need to sing the blues for a long time.
But I think that history is important, so the walk of fame to me, I think it's important so kids kind of know the people who uh kind of laid the foundation and you know were the bridge uh so to speak for them.
And white folks need to understand and love the music too.
If they understood and love that music, I wouldn't care who played it.
But love the music.
Love it, take care of it, don't just do any kind of way.
So it's no staying as rock fused blues.
Yeah, it is some rock fused blues.
But it's come from blues.
And the thing about it, it morphs itself in so many ways that you don't even know it's the blues, like they say, blues had babies, you know.
I have no fear uh that it ends when I take my last breath.
Low Fulson will live forever.
BB can live forever.
Bobby Blue, yeah, be here forever.
Those are the shows that we're standing on.
I don't like genres.
I just don't even like I I feel like a genre is a place to hide.
And I don't like everything that's blues, I love great artists.
When you think about Oakland, man, we've produced so many different types of artists just because of the place that it is.
So I'm at home with being in the legacy of Oakland Blues as much as I'm at home being in the legacy of rap with two short or the legacy of uh rock and roll with um and funk with so I saw there's a spirit, something special about the bear that we do things different.
You know, it's been such a long time, uh since I can see and talk to my old friend like what he was.
And oldest fan and howling woke.
I'm a great Albert King.
And compotivo.
And the Iceman with the Albert Collins.
And so many great musicians.
Like Mr.
Luther Tucker.
And the great Jimmy Hendrick.
Why it seemed just like yesterday.
If you listen to what Catherine can hear what he wanted to say.
Michael Catrice.
I have no more.
I closed that was.
Albert King.
I heard Albert say.
More than a bad side.
Looking for real bad luck.
I want to have no kind of look at all.
And of course.
Great Jimmy Hendrick.
I never had a pretty big Jimmy.
One of the few rebels I did.
Jimmy would say, I'm a voodoo child, baby.
Stand up next to a mountain.
Drop it down with the edge of my hand.
I'm a voodoo child.
Good evening, everyone.
Good evening, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to Amlo.
Put your hands together for Amlo.
What a great place this is.
Yay!
I'm Carmen Martinez, the director of the Oakland Public Library, and I welcome you here for our annual authors program.
We usually hold it during National Library Week, but this year we are so happy and so blessed and honored to have our featured author, Ms.
Isabel Wilkerson.
I wanted you to um just listen for a couple minutes to some acknowledgments I need to make.
A couple of um very important thank yous.
This is this program is all due in great part to our wonderful friends of the Oakland Public Library.
I don't know where they are tonight.
There are so many wonderful people here.
Yay!
Fobble!
Thank you.
Please visit the bookmark bookstore in Old Oakland.
Every single penny, well, almost every single penny that they earn from uh that they make from selling news books goes to programs like this and for other activities that the city can't afford to help us with.
So thank you, Fapel.
I'd also like to thank our wonderful Oakland Public Library staff, Rosalia Romo, Tom Downs, and uh let me see who else is here.
Catherine Cavot, Ekka, Eka Schneider, Winifred Walters, and I know I'm forgetting somebody, but I'll remember and thank them later.
Okay, so I was reading one Sunday the New York Times book review section, and I came across a review of the warmth, the warmth of other sons.
And I thought, well, you know, Oakland just has to be in this book.
It's about the Great Migration.
And so, yay.
The very next day I was with a whole bunch of library director colleagues in San Francisco, and my colleague from Cuyahoga, Cuyahoga County, said we we welcomed this fabulous author, Isabel Wilkerson.
She was fantastic.
She talked so eloquently.
Um perhaps you can get her for your program.
And we called Random House the next day.
She was already on the superstar list, but she wanted to come to Oakland because so much of her research was based here.
So yeah, so we were very we were very lucky to get her.
Um I need to tell you a little bit about her.
As you know, she was the Chicago Bureau chief of the New York Times, and it was there that she won the first.
She was the first African-American woman to win a excuse me, a Pulitzer Prize in journalism, and she won it for individual reporting.
The list goes on and on.
She also won the George Polk Award and a John Simon Guggenheim Fellowship.
And she is currently the professor of journalism and narrative and director of narrative nonfiction at Boston University.
She was born and raised in Washington, DC, and this is her first book.
Oh, yay!
And this is her first book, which she dedicates to her parents, and I love this part.
Her parents whose migration she says made her possible.
I see that our mayor is in the audience, our Mayor Jean Quan.
Welcome, Mayor, to the program.
Would you like you just want to?
Okay.
Okay, we're giving our mayor um ten seconds to say hello to all of you.
Come on.
Let's let's see if she can do it.
Hello.
Hello, how are you?
So let's talk about how we're gonna save the libraries.
Okay.
So first of all, um I I met with other library people this morning, and let me say that Oakland's no different than the rest of the country.
There are some people who think that we have to, after four years of cutting, that the only answer is to have an all-cuts budget.
And that that means that all they want to do is cuts.
They don't want to consider new taxes.
They don't want to consider anything, they just want to cut.
And it's no secret that I've had a little fight with the city council because had they at least given the voters the chance to decide two months ago when I asked them, we would have known by July 5th whether or not we had a parcel tax, and that that would have made sure that not only the libraries but many other programs like our senior programs, our rec centers would have survived pretty much without major cuts.
And so what I'm asking people to do, there's a budget hearing tomorrow.
And to talk to your council member, at least let the community decide.
So why do I need this money and want to talk about really quickly?
We've gone from four years of cuts.
This will be the fifth year of cuts, and last year in particular, we were hard hit because if you own a house.
How many of you bought a house within the last five years?
Anyone here?
You got an automatic property tax deduction, right?
Well, that cost the city 28 million dollars.
That means in one year we had to cut 28 million dollars, and we have to find a way to let the recession end and get our property taxes back up so we can maintain services.
It is so bad this year.
We've cut so many things that we may not be able to meet the minimum of major Q.
Now I wrote major Q, so this is like deja vu for me.
When my first meeting as a city council member, Robert Bob said he was going to close, I think a quarter of all the rec centers, I know, and and and a third of all the libraries.
So major Q needs to be protected.
The only way it can be protected is if we do the parser tax.
Secondly, I just want to say AMLO is an amazing institution because of what it does.
I spoke at the ethnic studies graduation yes uh last week at UC Berkeley.
Their archives are not as complete in some areas as ours are.
And so we do need to work and we need to protect it.
And the way you can do that is join the friends of this group to help increase the activity and the usage of this institution.
And secondly, help me get the parcel tax on the ballot and vote for it.
Thank you.
Okay, without further ado now, I do present Miss Isabel Wilkerson.
It means so much for me to be here in Oakland because this was one of the cities that I went to when I started working on this book.
You know, I spent 15 years on this book, as you all probably know.
You probably heard it over and over again.
And as you probably heard me say, if you've heard any of my talks, I always say that if it were a human being, it would be alive and dating.
That's how long it took to finish this.
It's a good thing I didn't know it would take this long because I probably would not have even begun it, and I am so glad I did.
I'm so glad I did.
Um, all of you turned out today are representing some ways a celebration, not of certainly not of me, hopefully in some ways of the book, but more importantly, for all of the people who may not be with us today who are the reason why we are even here, which is what propelled me to write this book to begin with.
I wrote this book because I am a child of the very phenomenon I've written about.
I'm sure that the room is filled with people who are children of the great migration or of a migration from someplace else.
How many of you are?
It is all of our stories.
The book is putatively the subtitle is the epic story of America's Great Migration.
But in many respects, the book is not about this great migration truly.
It is about the longing, the fortitude, the faith, and the courage that is the responsible for all of us being here right now in this place in our space right now.
In other words, somebody had to do what these people did for us to even be sitting or standing here today.
Truly.
And so the question was what did it take?
What did it take?
What did they leave?
What did they give up?
What were the sacrifices that they and so many other people made in order for us to be here today?
And also, it was written with such a in such a way as to ask the reader to think, what would you have done?
What would you have done had you been in the same place as the people in this book?
As the people who, you know, we're talking about this as a book, but this is not just a book.
This is people's lives.
These are real people who are the ancestors, the parents, the grandparents, the great-grandparents of pretty much everybody in this room, because we all are descended from people who came a long way away to get here.
To get to California means you came a long way away.
You had to cross an ocean or you had to cross a continent, but you had to come a long way away.
And I have to say, just to give you a little background on myself, if you don't know, I am the uh the product of a mixed marriage.
My mother was from Georgia, father from Virginia.
I call that a mixed marriage.
My mother was from Rome, Georgia, and I love to say that she's from Rome, Georgia, because I'll just say she's from Rome, and they say, wow, she's from Rome.
And then I say Georgia, they say, Oh.
And my father was from Virginia, and they came, they went to Washington, D.C., which was the beginning of the end of Jim Crow, you might say, on the East Coast.
And they came in different years and they met and they married and they had me.
And as a result of their participation in the Great Migration, which is similar to the migration experiences of so many other people who are American, I wouldn't even exist had they not done that.
How many of you would not have existed had someone not come a long way away from far, far away and met someone who they never would have met otherwise, created whole new lineages.
In other words, half the room would disappear because we wouldn't even have existed.
And so that's why I approached this book, this project with such a tremendous sense of gratitude.
Gratitude that I exist, gratitude that they made the great sacrifice in order for this to happen.
Now, I want to talk a little bit about what the migration is because you know, no discussion of this is complete without recognizing the magnitude of this thing.
This migration began during World War I and did not end until the 1970s.
Didn't end until the 1970s.
It meant that six million African Americans, and this is just one wave of migration, one kind of migration that has occurred with throughout the world.
But this was the largest one that occurred within the borders of our own country.
This is the only time that people who were citizens of their own country, the United States, had to leave one part of their own homeland for another part of their own country in order to experience the rights and privileges that they had been born to as citizens.
That's astounding.
That is astounding.
And yet that is what they had to do.
This migration was so massive that when this migration began, 90%, 90% of all African Americans were living in the South.
By the time that it was over, half were living everywhere else but the South.
From Boston to Chicago to Oakland and down to Los Angeles.
They were all over the country as a result of this.
It was a relocation of an entire people.
That is a lot of people who had made a decision to leave the only place that they had ever known for a place that they'd never seen in hopes that life might be better.
That takes a lot of courage.
It takes a lot of foresight.
It takes a lot of vision and it takes a lot of faith to essentially jump off a cliff into the unknown with no guarantees of success.
And so that's why I wanted to talk about, I wanted to understand what propelled people to do this.
What was it that inspired them to make this great leap of faith?
Ultimately, what this was was in some ways a defection.
This was misunderstood movement of people.
This was not people just being uh, you know, uh getting a transfer for a job.
In fact, they many of them did not know what they were going to do ultimately when they arrived.
Bear in mind that in some ways they were seeking political asylum from a caste system, which is almost impossible to comprehend now.
So you know I have to talk about that.
That caste system was something else.
That caste system had been carefully uh calibrated and designed to maintain an oversupply of cheap labor in the South, keeping them virtually imprisoned so that they would not have the options to go anywhere else.
And in order to do that, they had to make it so such that everyone understood that everyone had a role in that caste system.
And this hurt everyone, black and white.
It meant that it from the moment you woke up until the moment you went to sleep, there were rules, laws, and protocols that you had to have memorized in order to stay within the bounds of your caste and ultimately, particularly for African Americans, to stay alive.
It was a matter of life and death, a matter of life and death.
So some of the examples are, as you may have heard before in any of my talks, um, that it was actually against the law in Birmingham for a black person and a white person to play checkers together, merely to play checkers together.
Someone must have seen a black person and a white person in some town square in Birmingham, and they were playing checkers together, and they might have been having too good of time.
Maybe the wrong person was winning.
Maybe they were laughing.
Who knows what they were doing.
But someone saw that, and they decided that the entire foundation of southern civilization was in peril.
We cannot have this.
And so someone went and wrote that down as a law.
So that that meant that the black person who might have enjoyed playing checkers, and the white person who might have enjoyed playing checkers with their friend couldn't do that anymore.
They could face prison time, and you wouldn't want to face prison time, hard labor in Alabama at that time, I can assure you.
There were in courtrooms throughout the South, and it's still hard.
As many times as I've said it, it's still hard for me to believe there was actually a black Bible and a white Bible to swear to tell the truth on in courtrooms throughout the South.
A black Bible and a white Bible.
And the way that I found out about this was through uh all the research that I had to do.
There are no references to water fountains and restrooms anywhere in this book.
For any of you who've read it, you know that.
If you haven't read it, don't think that you don't worry that you're going to be reading about something you've heard about already because we know about that already.
There's no need to put that in.
No reference to restrooms or water fountains because we know that already.
I was looking for all the other things to make it come alive for people.
I wanted people to be able to really understand what these people had to live with day in and day out.
Black and white, actually, because we often talk about the and we all know how limiting and restrictive it was on black people, and it certainly was.
But it also meant that white people were restricted as well.
They had created the caste system, but it was a caste system that restricted everybody's movements.
So everyone was hurt by it.
And I would argue that for those in the up putatively in the upper caste, what they lost was a spiritual loss.
They lost a piece of their own of their spiritual selves because, and also the unmet potential, because if you're spending so much energy holding other people down, it means that you're there are other things that you're not able to do.
Because it takes a lot of energy to maintain a caste system, as I've described.
So back to the Bibles.
I found out about it because it was in an article in uh a North Carolina newspaper, and it came to light, it came, it made the newspaper not because anyone said, Well, this is an absurd ritual.
Why are we doing this?
Because people accepted this as the norm.
This is the way it should be.
It came to light because the uh during the middle of a trial in North Carolina, the trial had to be suspended because they couldn't find the black Bible.
A black person had taken the witness stand, which was rare enough to begin with, and they couldn't find the Bible that this person was supposed to touch.
It it turned out that they that it was not acceptable.
It was against the law for a black person and a white person to touch the same sacred text.
How ironic is that?
And so that meant the bailiff, the sheriff, and all the court officers had to go all over the courtroom trying to track down the black Bible for this person to be able to touch in order to swear to tell the truth, the truth and nothing but the truth, so help them God.
And that is what they had to do.
They finally found it and the trial could resume.
I've been asked since then, well, was it a different version of the Bible?
Like, did the white people have the King James version and the white and the black people had the American standard maybe?
Um, but it turned out it was the same Bible.
It's just they could not touch the same sacred object.
Now, you know, I've been all over the country.
In fact, I just got back from Italy, where believe it or not, there's great interest in this great migration, and I think that's a beautiful thing.
Beautiful thing.
Not amazing.
And they have been reading the book in English, and they've been studying the book because they're facing great migration issues themselves, and so they want to understand it.
But um, as I was uh as I was there, I've been all over the country, and my toughest audiences are always high school students.
So I've I've been I've been through that, and I have been searching for ways to make this come alive for them.
You know, most people seem to be seem to really understand it when I describe the two things I've described for you.
But with the high school students, I have to come up with something else.
So I finally figured out what gets through to them.
Now, before I tell you what that is, I want to first ask for a show of hands as to how many people in the last week have passed someone on the road.
Yeah, every hand goes up, yeah.
There's I'm always surprised that there's a delay in the answer.
It's almost like people think, is there a new law that says we can't do this anymore?
So they're hesitant.
Maybe she won't think so well of me if she knows I passed somebody, but you know, and it's it's perfectly legal as far as I'm as I as far as I know.
Uh, and in fact, you'd probably pass someone on the way here, truth be told, if you're if you're being honest.
Well, if you were African American in the South, during much of the time period I've described, you couldn't do that.
You could not pass a black motorist, could not pass a white motorist on the road no matter how slowly that person was going.
No matter how slowly that person was going.
And you know how when you're behind someone who's lost or they're they're from out of town and they stop every 10 feet thinking that this is the turn, that might have happened to you yesterday, and you want so badly to get around them, and if you can, you will.
Well, you couldn't do that if you were African American.
And I would argue that that is so frustrating to people that that alone could account for probably a couple million people to leave right then and there.
How they bore up under that, I'll never understand it.
And yet that was the law.
That was the law.
And it and when I describe this, I mean, we all um, you know, it seems so absurd that we can now kind of chuckle at it, but this was actually life and death.
It really was life and death.
Every four days, every four days during the time period in the decades leading up to the migration and the decades immediately following the migration, an African-American was lynched every four days somewhere in the South.
So this was truly life and death.
And the reason I say that is because we know about the more commonly um uh the commonly associated reason for lynching, having to do with uh generally a black man's uh an accusation that a black man may have made some untoward uh remark toward a white woman.
That actually was not the more common reason, however, when you look at the statistics of the lynchings.
Lynchings most likely occurred because a black person had been accused of trying to act like a white person.
That was the general accusation, meaning they were stepping outside of their caste.
That's how big and significant and enduring and the and oppressive this caste system truly was.
They would be they would be that meant that they had been accused of of not stepping of not stepping off the sidewalk fast enough, of of speaking in a way that was not appropriate to their caste, of looking straight into the eye of someone.
It actually turned out that that the uh that the protocols were so strict that an anthropologist of that day said that the majority of people of diff of each race had not ever shaken the hand of someone of the other race because that was not allowed.
So this shows you that it was a nerve-jangling experience just to make it through the day.
And these were the kinds of things that people had to live with day in and day out, and so ultimately this was in some ways a search for political asylum.
Now, how and why did this migration actually begin?
There are many reasons and discussions as to why, but ultimately the precipitating event was World War I.
And during World War One, during World War I, the North had a problem.
African Americans have been wanting to leave for a long, long time, but there was really no option other than to stay there because the caste system had created a limit, so many limits and restrictions on them.
And so during World War I, Europe was at war, and that meant that all of the Europeans who had been coming in, the European immigrants who had been fueling the factories and the steel mills and the foundries were no longer available.
And the North needed labor.
And where did they look?
They looked to the cheapest labor in the land, which was African Americans in the South.
The South was the poorest region of the country, and these were the poorest paid people in the South.
Many of them were not paid at all for their labor.
They were they were working merely for the right to live on the land that they were farming.
They were sharecroppers.
So they were quite ready to be recruited to go north.
So this is a reminder for people who may not have understood much about this migration.
African Americans, most African Americans in the North and the West, arrived at the invitation, the express invitation of industries that wanted their labor.
The interesting thing about this is that they often wanted the labor, they wanted the workers, but didn't want the people.
So how do you manage that?
You know, how do you manage that?
That's a conundrum.
In any case, they set about trying to do what they could to get them.
So they went and actually recruited.
Recruited people to come to these places to work.
So you have unusual combinations of cities where people, where people in the North went to recruit.
Beloit, Wisconsin went to the people there went to Mississippi, for example.
And so what happened was you have these connections.
Finally, the door opened and the people began to answer the call.
But when the South found out about this, the South did not take kindly to this at all.
They did not take kindly to the poaching of their cheap labor one bit.
And so they began to take action to stop this.
There was a great deal of hand wringing about what to do about it, and they began to do uh make great efforts.
They did they they tried to fight it on both levels.
One, they wanted to deal with the supply side, meaning the people who were trying to leave, and on the demand side, meaning the people who were trying to recruit.
So on the supply side, what they started to do was they would arrest people on the railroad platforms when there were many, many black people waiting with set with northbound tickets ready to leave, trying to leave.
They would arrest them from the train seats.
Once they were on the train and they thought they were handing the ticket to the conductor, they're actually handing it to a sheriff who was about to arrest them.
And that was that was all these efforts to thwart their effort to get out.
And then when there were too many people to arrest, they would wave the train on through so that people who had been saving for months and months and months for that ticket to go north had to watch that train pass them by, that train to what they felt would be freedom.
And that was what they ended up having to do.
On the demand side, they would start arresting, they would arrest people, northerners who were who were caught recruiting without a license.
They set these incredible licensing fees.
One fee in Macon, Georgia, required that anyone who wanted to recruit a single black person had to pay 25,000 licensing fee.
Now, the equivalent in 2011 is half a million dollars to recruit one black person.
Who in the world would play pay that to recruit one person?
And so that was definitely going to be a dampening effort.
One would think, but actually the uh the reverse occurred.
But I want to tell you, uh, give you a little sense of what these people, what the people were thinking about.
What were the southerners thinking at the time that this was going on?
And this is a quote from Macon Telegraph, an editorial, which says so much about how the South was reacting.
And so this editorialist wrote this.
Everybody seems to be asleep about what is going on right under our noses.
That is everybody but those farmers who have waked up on mornings recently to find every Negro over 21 on his place gone, to Cleveland, to Pittsburgh, to Chicago, to Indianapolis.
They hadn't gone to LA yet because this is World War I.
They hadn't gotten to California or Oakland yet.
And while our very solvency, our very solvency, is being sucked out beneath us, we go on about our affairs as usual.
So this gives you a sense of the of their hand wringing and the uh questioning and the wondering and the effort to try to keep the people from leaving.
And yet every single thing that was done actually only fed the desire of the people to leave.
It had the reverse effect.
All this hand-wringing and wondering what to do, the arresting of the people on the railroad platforms only made the people want to go all the more because it gave them a sense that this was not going to be a place that was going to change anytime soon.
Now I want to talk a little bit about the uh the work on this book because you know it's been a long odyssey.
Um I talked to seniors here in Oakland, I talked to seniors in Los Angeles, I talked to seniors in uh in Chicago and New York, all in Milwaukee, all over the country.
And I set about trying to talk to people in order to find out what the stories were.
And it turned out that, you know, these people often did not perceive themselves as being a part of any great wave, which is one reason why I described this book as and this migration rather as one of the greatest underreported stories of the 20th century.
It was underreported because the people didn't talk about it.
Any of you who have had this in your background know that the people didn't talk about it.
My own mother was probably the toughest interview of all.
She was saying, you know, she was saying, well, no why do you want to go out that that's in the past?
That's in the past.
That's in the past.
Let's let that go.
In fact, she, you know, many people changed their name.
My mother added an E to her name, it's Ruby.
She added an E to it to change her name.
There's someone in the book who changes his name.
People changed their name.
They didn't look back.
In some ways, when they arrived here, it was like they had a new birthday.
Nothing that they had been through in the past had even happened.
They were starting a new one.
They didn't want to think about it.
They also wanted to protect the children from whatever it is that they had gone through.
They many people have carried this to their grave and never told what happened.
Ultimately, it was just too painful.
It was much too painful.
There was a great deal of shame uh associated with what they had gone through, and why?
Why should they feel ashamed of what they endured?
The goal of this is to turn that paradigm around and to say that what they went through, we should be, we should be joyous that they survived at all.
We should we should we should express gratitude.
I'm I'm personally feel filled with a sense of both sadness that they had to endure it, but a sense of gratitude that they had the fortitude in order to live through those times.
And this is a this is an effort to try to embrace that and learn something from what they had endured.
Learn something so that all that they endured does not go in vain, so that we can exact in fact gain strength from the strength that it took them in order to survive it.
That's the goal of all of this.
Now, in order to go out and uh write about this this uh this huge phenomenon, as I told you, I went all over the country.
I came here and I uh interviewed so many people, I interviewed over 1,200 people.
And what that meant was I had I ate well.
Let me say this.
I ate very well.
I ate very well.
And actually, you know, I I like to say that it was an experience of doing that.
So let me give you a little sense of what this migration has meant for people.
The South is huge.
Each state that the people came from is distinct from the other states.
It's not just one monolith.
So people who are from Texas came from a very different culture than people who are from Virginia, which is totally different from Alabama, which is totally different from Florida, which has very little, it seems to do with Tennessee.
I mean, all of these states are very different.
And when they left, they transferred their culture with them.
And we in some ways are the bearers of that culture in the same way that um that when you go to certain parts of uh the lower east side of Manhattan, or you go to certain parts of Chicago and you find that there's a little Italy, or you find that there's a Ukrainian village in Chicago, and that in Minnesota, there are a lot of people from Scandinavia.
Well, the same thing goes for this migration.
It was not a haphazard unfurling of lost souls.
People made made individual, well thought out, planned decisions as to where they were gonna go based on the bus routes, the train lines, and the already uh well uh well-trod road that had been developed for them from where they were from.
And that is the reason why.
I'll just ask here how many of you have forebears or people from people from uh Louisiana or Texas?
Yeah, Mississippi, Arkansas, yeah.
They're few, but you see, the over all the hands most of the hands go up for Texas and Louisiana, because that was the route that was taken to get out of Texas and Louisiana primarily was to come to California.
So they're they're all over California.
The people who really wanted to get away went to Seattle.
One of my mother's cousins went there from Rome to Seattle.
She really wanted to get out.
When you're looking at uh the Midwest, though, you're looking at people who went from Mississippi, Alabama, uh, Tennessee, and uh Arkansas often to Chicago, Detroit, Cleveland, Minneapolis, the entire Midwest.
And then the migration stream that I my family was part of took people from Florida, Georgia, the Carolinas up to Washington, DC, Detroit, Washington, D.C., to uh Philadelphia, New York, and Boston.
So those were the roots.
Those roots are beautifully defined.
It means that the people were not just scattered to the wind.
They were thinking about what they were going to do.
They were planning.
They did a great deal of work.
There are many telegrams that went back and forth, letters back and forth, letters of the Chicago to the Chicago defender, letters to a great aunt or a minister's son who was up in the north or out here in the West.
A great deal of planning went into this.
And that is also one of the myths that that had often prevailed that they just people just landed here out of nowhere.
That was not the case.
And so the process of going out and doing the search for the people and doing the reporting for this book was quite interesting because I was running into the very manifestation of the differences between these migration streams.
Beautiful differences.
Meaning the people had many and mostly left for the same reason.
But the roots meant that a different culture sprang out of the migration stream that I might have been visiting.
So I'll tell you a little bit about the three things that I ran into that were quite interesting.
One is that when I went to uh Chicago, when I was in Chicago, I found myself on a bus that had been chartered by some seniors who were going to be going to a floating casino, meaning they were going to gamble.
It was early in the month.
It was early in the month.
They met at a, they always gathered at a uh parking lot outside a jewel food store at 87th and the Dan Ryan.
Anyone from Chicago knows where that is.
Yeah, see if you hands.
And it was always early in the morning, it'd be lots of buses, and it was just a question of where they were going.
Got on the right bus.
And as soon as I got on the bus, there was a commotion, actually, because someone had brought a cooler which contained a delicacy from the old country.
A delicacy from the old country, and everyone was in an uproar when they found out it was on the bus.
Now, I had never heard of this delicacy, and I'm wondering how many people here have heard of it.
I will tell you what it is, but first I wanted to say that the people in the back were quite anxious to make sure there was enough left for them.
They said we should have saved some for us.
They were very gracious, and they decided to offer the guest, meaning me, first piece of this delicacy.
I'd never heard of it.
It was called Hoghead Cheese.
How many of you have heard of hoghead cheese?
How many of you call it South Meat?
Okay, that's interesting.
That's a reflection of the migration stream right there because some people know it only as that.
How many of you actually had hoghead cheese?
Yes.
Notice, however, that there were fewer hands of people who had actually had it than had heard of it.
Interesting.
And so when they offered it to me, well, I have to say, my Georgia born mother never made it, and my Virginia born father never required it.
And so therefore I never had it, and I'd never heard of it.
And so when they broke it out, um, there was a great deal of excitement about it, but I I didn't know what I was going to do because I didn't really.
Look, all I knew was.
All I knew was it involved a hog and a hair.
And you know, neither one of those was working for me.
This wasn't working for me.
And so I had to find a way to demure um graciously.
And so what I did was I told them uh that about some, told them I had blood pressure, high blood pressure to worry about, which I did not, but which they accepted as a perfectly reasonable reason to uh forego the hoghead cheese.
And then they decided to set about uh carving out the hunks to spread out as you know it's in hunks, right?
Uh and so that's how that was the experience there.
Uh now when I came to the West Coast, I found that it was not easy to necessarily make my way because it's very complicated.
It's much more complicated here.
People are coming from Louisiana, there are multiple kinds of Louisiana, it's not just one Louisiana, there's Northern Louisiana, which is closer to more Delta, there's Southern Louisiana, which is you've got uh New Orleans, you have all kinds of experiences here in Louisiana.
I spent so much time on every permutation that you could imagine.
I was zydeco, got exposed to that and never heard of that.
Zydeco.
Um I learned that, you know, the the the spellings and and and pronunciations of many words, which I'm convinced are a way of exposing people who are not from there.
That's what I've convinced.
A lot of things are we know you're not from there.
And I I had to work very hard to get in the good graces of people who uh recognize, well, where are your people from?
That was a question that I got a lot of.
And no one had heard of Rome, Georgia, so that didn't go very that didn't help me very much.
But the people were very friendly and very gracious, and I managed to find that there were multiple clubs for and many of the groups.
There were Monroe Louisiana Club, there were there was Lake Charles, Louisiana Club, all kinds of Texas clubs for days because Texas is a country unto itself, and I f yes, and I found my way in.
I had every permutation of red beans and rice with sugar and without.
There's a whole issue with that, and you know those are, you know, cooks might leave the kitchen over the issue of sugar and both greens and and red beans and rice.
And so I had all kinds of wonderful experiences just learning my way around.
I went to all kind of Juneteenth parades, I had a booth at a Juneteenth parade.
So I did all of this in order to learn the experiences of that.
But each migration stream is distinct, and I'm so proud of the of the experiences that I had here.
But when I went to New York, just to give a sense of how how beautifully predictable each migration stream is.
When I went to New York, as big as New York is, I went to senior centers there, and at one of the senior centers there, I actually ran into not just people who had heard of Petersburg, Virginia, which is where my father's from, but they actually knew him.
They actually knew him.
That shows you how beautifully predictable this migration stream was.
And the migration exists and lives in all of us, even to this day, because there are connections in all of these places, and I'm so grateful for the people who invited me into their stream, even though I was from a different stream.
I'm so grateful to that.
Now, to tell you just a little bit about the three people in the book.
Um, those of you who may have read it, you know that it's about three people.
Narrowed down those 1,200 to three amazing and beautiful people, complicated people, not predictable people.
Um, and each of them represent the three streams.
So one of them represents the stream up the east coast.
He came from Florida and went to uh Harlem.
He had was leav basically fleeing for his life because he'd gotten on, he tried to earn a little bit more for the people he was working with in the groves.
He'd had a little bit of college, he was good with math, and you could see how the people were being cheated out of out of what they were supposed to be making.
The work was dangerous.
They were having to climb these 40-foot trees, taking their lives in their own hands, and then they were being paid nickels for a box uh for fruit that would go and sell for four dollars a box.
They weren't asking for four dollars or just asking for a few more pennies more.
For doing that in the 1940s.
Uh he had to flee for his life because that was not acceptable for an African American and that caste system to do that.
That just was not, you just that was just not possible.
So he had to flee for his life.
He ended up becoming a railroad porter.
The second story was of a woman who had been a sharecropper's wife in Mississippi.
But she was terrible at picking cotton.
You know, that's not a good thing to be a sharecropper's wife, meaning that's your job, and you're terrible at it.
You know, you're just not good at it.
And you know, actually, that's a lesson too.
Just think of all the people who had to do this because that happens to be where they were born, they were born into a caste system.
But maybe they would have been better at chemistry.
Perhaps they needed to be bookkeepers.
Maybe they would have been really wonderful horticulturalists.
Who knows what they might have been.
But they were they were consigned to a world in which all they could do was a particular thing.
In fact, in the state of South Carolina, it was against the law for a black person, uh, a black person had to actually get a license, go to and petition to do anything other than agricultural work.
That's how difficult and controlling this was.
That means someone who actually would should have been an opera singer was gonna have to go and work in the fields because that was all that they could do.
So uh, so that was one of the people that was one of the things that she actually was not good at, and it was kind of refreshing to hear that you know, actually I hadn't even thought about being good or bad at it, but there were people who actually were bad at it and actually felt bad about it.
Um, but that wasn't why they left, they left because a cousin of her husband's had been beaten to within an inch of his life, and um her husband said to her after what he saw, it happened to his cousin, this is the last co-op we're making, and they had to set about getting off the land of the uh of the planter, and they couldn't tell anybody.
This they uh she told me years later, she said, You didn't tell people you were gone until you were gone.
You couldn't let people know what you were doing, you couldn't trust anyone, so she just told her mother and one of his trusted nephews, and that's how they got out.
And then finally, the trial the the the uh the migration to California was represented by a Dr.
Robert Joseph Pershing Foster, who was from Monroe, Louisiana, and I got a question earlier before arriving that I was gonna have to discuss how he came to make the decision, and I'm not saying I agreed with it.
I'm just saying this is decision he made to go to LA after having seen Oakland.
I did not make I didn't make the decision.
It was his decision.
I can't say I would agree with him.
I'm just saying this is a decision he made.
I love the Bay Area.
I love the Bay Area, it's one of my favorite places ever to come.
And I will come here willingly, happily, any time because I love it.
Um but uh he made the decision because, well, if you know him, if you read about him, you'll know he was a flamboyant surgeon who had uh performed in the army as a surgeon, but it turned out he couldn't practice surgery in his own hometown of Monroe, Louisiana, and so he set out on this journey to get to California.
He had to, it was a perilous journey that meant that he ended up having to drive for three states of the West without being able to stop because it turned out that Jim Crow had extended farther than he had anticipated.
He just did not realize that.
And it was a quiet kind of Jim Crow.
It wasn't in your face.
There were no signs, it's just that no one would take him in for the night.
And he had to make that drive.
And I attempted, I recreated that drive myself at my parents in the car, and um he had rented a buy he had driven a Buick, the Buick was uh he had a Buick Roadmaster in 1949.
He said if you'd seen it, you would have wanted it too.
That just tells you what he's like.
And so uh I rented a Buick in his honor, and I was driving, and my parents were in the car, had them with me, and we came to the part of the road.
And how many of you made the drive through the mountains to get here?
Then you know, even now it's it's perilous and treacherous.
Imagine not being able to stop.
Imagine you have imagine having to take those hairpin curves at night through the mountains, through the desert, no cars in the road.
Um, you know, the road is so mean that it's going north and south as much as west, and that's what we were going through.
And I began to get sleepy.
I began to veer from the road, and my parents got worried for us, um, and they actually said, You really need to stop the car.
You know, you really need to stop the car.
Stop the car.
And if you won't stop the car, let us out.
And they said, they said basically, you know, if you want to know about Jim Quote, we will tell you.
If this is a way to get us out, we'll tell you about it.
We'll talk.
So we stopped in Yuma, Arizona, where we had no trouble at all because it just shows you how far we've come.
We have a long, long way to go as a country, but we've come so far that we had no trouble at all.
It was a choice of which one, which which in uh did you want to stay in?
Holiday inn, Keita Inn, all the different ones.
Which one did you want to stay in?
And we had no trouble at all.
And that actually made me feel more empathy for him because it showed you that as tired as we were, uh, we had options that he didn't have.
He did not have the option in 1953, and that was not that long ago.
Not that long ago at all.
And um I I am tempted to read you something about him because I would love to, but I don't want to take up any more time.
I want to make sure I can answer your questions.
I want to close with a couple of things.
Um, you want to all right.
All right, well, this is um Dr.
Robert Joseph Pershing Foster.
Um I'm just gonna say one other thing.
You know, I keep feeling the need to defend uh what he his decision, even though I didn't make his decision.
Now, the thing is he had a father-in-law who he was trying to also run from.
He was running from Jim Crow, he's running from the father-in-law.
Father-in-law was a very powerful man in Atlanta.
He was president of Atlanta University, and he was a very uh uh powerful uh uh overwhelming figure, and so uh before he left, before Robert Joseph Pershing Foster left for this drive, the father-in-law said, uh, you need to go to the Bay Area.
I love the Bay Area.
You will love the Bay Area, go to the Bay Area.
At that point, that pretty much sealed it for the Bay Area.
He was gonna choose something no matter what, as long as it wasn't what his father-in-law wanted.
But let me read this to you.
This is Los Angeles, 1996.
This is the day that I met Robert Joseph Pershing Foster.
The panel door rises a story high and would befit a museum or government office, but is actually the front door of a Spanish revival south of Wilshire.
The door opens, and there stands a one-time bourbon swilling army captain and deft-handed surgeon, who now in his later years is a regular at the blackjack tables and the trifectas at Santa Anita.
But he is at the heart of it all, and perhaps most important, a longstanding, still bitter, and somewhat obsessive expatriate from the 20th century south.
The heartbreak Jim Crow land he chose to reject before it could reject him again.
He is a Californian now, this Robert Joseph Pershing Foster.
He is the color of strong coffee and has waves in his hair, which he lets grow as untamed as Einsteins, but then brushes back like the boys in the band.
He's wearing a white cotton island shirt, loose slacks, and sandals, the uniform of the well-to-do LA pensioner.
He has the build and bearing of a Sammy Davis Jr.
and not a little of a showmanship and delightful superficiality that seemed to grow on people in certain circles of LA.
That's LA, she says.
Now, you know, I've read that in LA, and I started to think, oh, I meant to edit that out.
But you know what?
They loved it.
They said, Yep, we're superficial.
We're superficial.
They loved it.
And you know it's right, don't you?
Yeah.
He walks straight back and slew footed into the foyer, past the curved, faux gone with the wind staircase, and the East Asian pottery.
He gestures toward the living room and imposing ballroom of a space that dwarfs him in its volume, fairly frozen in the seafoam carpet and hot pink tulip chairs out of a Sherbety Doris Day movie from the 50s.
The whole effect is as starched and formal as the tuxedos he used to wear to the parties he threw for himself back when his wife Alice was alive and the money was raining down like confetti.
He seems accustomed to people fawning over the place, and with the prim air of leading men of his favorite movies from back in the 40s, insists on serving his guests a slice of lemon pound cake and vanilla ice cream on Rosenthal China, whether they would like to have it or not, which I did not.
I'd already eaten.
He sat and watched, he is a physician or was for most of his adult life, and by most accounts a very good one, and is prone to pontificate like a man of his years and accomplishments.
But he is just as likely to interrupt himself and check the time to see if he can still make the one o'clock at the Hollywood Park racetrack.
His photo albums are filled with an unlikely assortment of bookies and blues singers and dentists and fraternity men and surgeons and society people whose approval he craved even though he knew they were too pretentious to matter really.
He doesn't say it because it would be gauche and hardly worth mentioning from his point of view, but there happened to be a lot of little Roberts around town due to the fact that over the years he delivered a number of baby boys whose mothers were so grateful for his firm hand and calming reassurances at the precise moment of truth that they named their sons not after their husbands, but after the doctor who had delivered their babies.
Before he begins the story, he tells you it's a long one and you can't get it all.
He's lived too many lives, done too much, known too many people, ridden so high and so low that there's no point in fooling yourself into thinking you can capture the whole of it.
You could try, of course, and he agrees to give as much as he can.
I love to talk, he says, a smile forming on a still chiseled face as he sits upright in his tulip chair, and I am my favorite subject.
I just want to close with um with these thoughts and before taking your questions, and that is that this migration, you know, we've talked about the the joys of of reporting it.
We've talked about the origins of it and how we all owe a debt of gratitude to the people who made it possible for us to be here.
In fact, many of us wouldn't be here if they hadn't left and met the people who would ultimately become our grandparents' parents or whatever.
But this migration has a lot of lessons for all of us today.
Remember, this migration was a leaderless revolution that changed the country.
That shows you the power of the individual.
One person multiplied by millions, ended up putting so much pressure on the South that it forced the South to change.
And the ways that it forced us out to change was this.
One, it showed the South and also the North that the lowest caste people in this country had options, finally, and were willing to take them.
Wasn't sure, it wasn't clear whether they would take them or not.
This is the first time in American history that this low the lowest caste people, African Americans, took this huge step to leave the only place that they had ever been for most of their history and set out for courses at places unknown.
Secondly, it exposed the people who stayed to options, other ways of being.
In other words, they would come and visit their cousins and their great aunts and and the neighbors who moved up north or out west, and they could see how the people are living.
And they could they wonder to themselves and said to themselves, why can't we have this back home?
Why can't we walk freely down the street without fearing that we might somehow offend and get on the wrong side of a caste system that is so hard to figure out that we just basically shrink from everything?
Why can't we have that here?
And that helped to feed and fuel the uh what would ultimately be known as the civil rights movement.
The civil rights movement would have happened eventually, but it was it was accelerated by the mass departures of half basically half of the black population from the South.
That's massive.
That's power of the individual.
And then finally, those people were sending money back home to help uh support the effort.
So there was all of this back and forth going on.
It took people in the north and the west and people in the south to make this happen.
Remember that whenever there's any kind of turmoil anywhere in the world usually the United States gets more involved if there is already a contingent of people from that part of the world here in this country and that's because those people can put pressure on the United States to at least cover it and pay attention just by being there not having to necessarily even protest just by being there in other words the North and the West having such a large percentage of black people that they'd never had before had to take note of what was going on in the South they hadn't been paying attention before it should be remembered that resistance to this caste system resistance to what is known as whether you want to call it slavery uh the Jim Crow caste system whatever you want to call it resistance had been going on since 1619 there had been resistance to this uh to the oppression that African Americans have been living under for the entire time was going on but these were people who were dying or attacked lynched but they were like trees that were falling and no one was hearing them finally there was when there was a large enough contingent of people in these big cities where all the media were where the cameras were suddenly people were taking notice and it was then and only then that all of this these resistance efforts were getting attention and that is what helped fuel the civil rights movement what I like to consider the human rights movement forward.
And then finally I wanted to say that what is the result of any migration experience what truly is a result of it people who migrate often don't do it for themselves.
It's almost too late for them sometimes because they've already suffered whatever the indignities are the um the lowered experiences with education the limits on their education some could only go as far as the eighth grade that was as far as you could go in Chickasaw County Mississippi for example others could only go as far as the 11th grade that was a standard for many many people at that time they had already suffered the lack of nutrition whatever it was they had already suffered but it wasn't too late for the children and the unseen grandchildren and great grandchildren meaning us.
It wasn't too late.
So ultimately when they made this decision to leave it was not for them but ultimately it was for us all of us I mean this is for I always say that this was not unlike any migration the people who migrated across the Atlantic and steerage the people who crossed the Pacific Ocean and those who crossed the Rio Grande everyone who does such a thing is doing it for the unseen children and grandchildren who might benefit and what happened what happened to those people those people this was the first time that people in this lowest cast had an opportunity to become their truer selves and those children once they got the opportunity not all not everybody in any group is going to go off and become Nobel laureates but this was the first time that you had an opportunity for Tony Morrison to exist the first time and that is because during the time that her parents migrated from Alabama to Ohio had they not migrated she would not have been able to do something that we take for granted and perhaps today we're not taking as granted as much in this particular moment here in this building she would not have been able to go to a library and take out a library book it was against the law for African Americans to do that.
And if you're going to become a Nobel laureate you kind of need to be able to get a book now and then she would not have been able to do that had her parents stayed she would not have been able to do that.
When it comes to music music as we know it would simply not exist much of the music as we know it.
Motown would not have existed at all that's because Barry Gordy migrated from George his parents migrated from Georgia to Detroit there when he got to be a grown man he looked around him he wanted to go into music he didn't have the money to go scouting out the best talent so what did he do?
He ended up looking around himself and there were these children the children of the great migration children who were listening to gospel music at home and spirituals at home and the blues music at home.
And they were playing it out for themselves, and he saw these three girls.
One of them was full of personality but didn't have the strongest voice.
I think you know I'm speaking about.
We would not even know her name, Diana Ross.
Her, and that's because her father migrated from West Virginia, mother from Alabama, met in Detroit.
She wouldn't even have existed had there been no great migration, much less to be, you know, to be discovered by Barry Gordy, who also wouldn't have existed, but you just keep going back and back and back.
And you realize that this is an American story of so many people who wouldn't have existed, and we wouldn't even know their names had they not migrated out and taken this act of courage to leave.
He also heard about this very large family in Gary, Indiana.
Nine or ten kids, five boys, the youngest one was the one who did all the dancing and singing.
We would not know Michael Jackson's name.
We would not know Prince's name.
All these people are individuals who were products of people who had migrated from different parts of the South to the North, met in the North, had the children, and the children had the opportunity to be exposed to and to be to be discovered.
The talent was within them all along, but it was latent and undeveloped because people were stuck in a caste system.
And when it comes to jazz, Miles Davis simply would not have been able to become the person that he did had there been no great migration.
His parents migrated from Arkansas to Illinois, where he had the opportunity to develop his skill, the luxury, you might say.
Delonius Monk, his parents migrated from North Carolina to Harlem when he was five years old.
He too had the luxury of being able to spend time developing his his in his God-given talent instead of picking tobacco, which is what the family would have been doing in North Carolina, and John Coltrane.
John Coltrane.
He migrated himself at the age of 17 from North Carolina to Philadelphia, where believe it or not, think about this historical fact.
That is where when he got to Philadelphia, that is where he got his first Alto Sachs.
He had not touched an Alto Sachs until he got to Philadelphia.
And where would jazz be?
Where would music be?
Where would culture be?
And not just American culture, but world culture.
All of these names I've given you just a few of the names.
This is just, this is just the tip of the iceberg.
I have a long list of recognized household names from August Wilson to Michelle Obama to James Baldwin and Richard Wright, all of these people who would never have been able to become the people that they had had someone not made the decision to leave, simply to leave.
The power of the individual decision could lead to so much that we now, in some ways, just it's so embedded in our culture that we don't often realize that this is actually the culture of a people who had left and made this big decision to leave.
Now, I want to end with uh with this quote from Richard Wright, because you know, we're we're in difficult times overall, as a country, as a planet on so many levels, and yet, you know, the human story is one of which in which we truly have so much more in common than we've been led to believe, and we have so much more strength because it's embedded in our backgrounds.
We need to recalibrate what it means to be a hero.
Our young people need to recalibrate what it means to be a hero.
We have heroes in all of our backgrounds, all of our families.
We need to know the family story to realize how did we as individuals get to this point.
These people who made this sacrifice have left us in some ways, the code, the answer to a lot of the questions that we might ever have.
They left us not through their words but by their actions as to what we should do even today.
We have the strength within us to overcome anything because these people had to overcome so much more than we can even fathom.
And these are people who we're talking about we're in a great recession.
These are people who were who survived the Great Depression, and this is not to compare it, you know, our expectations are different now, but the reality is these people had so little compared to what we have.
The poorest person has a cell phone.
It may be Metro PC, yes, but they have a cell phone.
Remember, they didn't have a cell phone.
And so they have left us, they have left us through their actions, and also in our our very, our very DNA, you might say, as as people who are descended from people, all people here in the United States for the most part, are descended from people who came a long way away just to get here.
That makes people different.
There's something different about people who make this leap of faith.
And so they have left us the answers.
And I want to leave with end with this quote from Richard Wright, where the title of the book comes from.
In some ways, it's a prayer, it's what he said to himself as he was about to leave Mississippi for uh Chicago.
And it's a it's a lesson for all of us to, you know, whisper it to ourselves in moments of darkness where we're wondering what to do.
And he said, I was leaving the South to fling myself into the unknown.
I was taking a part of the South to transplant in alien soil, to see if it could grow differently, if it could drink of new and cool rains, bend in strange winds, respond to the warmth of other suns, and perhaps to bloom.
They have left us the answers to almost any question we might have.
They may not even be here to tell us what it is, but they have by their actions.
And that means that if they could do what they did without cell phones, no Skype, no email, think about the moment of departure.
Think about the moment of departure for all of them, which is how we all got here ultimately.
There's a moment of departure in which all of our, somebody in all of our backgrounds had to look into the face into the eyes, the teary eyes, truly, of the parent, the person who had raised them, the mother, the father, the grandmother, the grandfather, the aunt, whoever it might have been.
And they could not be assured that they would ever see this person alive again.
This is not this is not an exaggeration.
This is the reality of life at the time that I'm talking about.
Remember, there was no email.
There was no Skype.
So when they were leaving, if they were getting on a on a boat from uh from uh Europe to here, if they were getting on a train from Florida to Seattle, you know, there was no guarantee that they would see this person alive again.
No guarantee.
And that person, that older person who could not make the crossing, because this is a young person's thing, really.
They were too old to make the crossing.
They had lived their lives, and they had to look into the eye of that person that they had raised and wonder if they would live to see them a lot, see them again in their lifespan, and not know if they ever would.
Think about that.
Think about the sacrifice that they had to make at that moment-the heart-wrenching moment of departure.
And when you think about what they had to do in order for us to be here today, you re you realize that if they could do what they did with absolutely nothing but just grit, fortitude, faith, and hope, and a belief in something that they could not even see but believed had to be better than what they had there, then that means that there's nothing that we, the heirs to all that they did, cannot do.
So thank you so much for having me.
Thank you.
I've been told that we can take about 10 minutes for questions if there are any.
Yes.
No, no, no.
Yes, the question was, do I travel to the South to deliver the message to talk about the book?
And yes, I do, and I've I was surprised that actually, the very first place that I was invited to speak.
This is before the book came out was the University of Mississippi.
Yeah, and I I uh uh wondered at first at certain point to remind them, you know, the book is about the people who left.
And they say, yes, we understand, we know that we want to hear about it.
And the reason is because actually the the uh I should say that the turnout, some of the best turnouts uh are in the South, and that's because these are their people.
These are their people.
These are their cousins, their uh their aunts, sometimes their grandparents, sometimes their parents, these are their people, and so they feel a deep connection to this, a deep curiosity.
More, you know, I'm I've been really gratified to see that.
I know that you know that the first one.
Yes, I was at the University of Virginia, and um it was a great turnout, and um I was in that particular setting, I was the only person of color in the room, which is very which is which says a lot about the appreciation for history overall, um, and I was very I was gratified to see that as well.
So uh the and in some ways this great migration, the people who were part of this migration, in some ways were unwitting ambassadors of southern culture because they brought the culture with them.
So Southerners, if they look at it and and really uh take note of what happened, then in some ways the way that they probably that I gather that it's being uh understood and appreciated is that these are our people who went to the north and the west and carried the culture with them so that in some ways we can take a part of that.
We can we can take joy in it.
We've come a long long way.
We really have come a long way, and the turnout has been phenomenal in the South.
It has been what we said.
Yes, my name is Malcolm Westbrooks, and my father JB and my mother Videlia migrated to Oakland 1937 uh from Jasper County, Texas, and he did it by freight train.
But uh I know what that means.
Photo of them on the East Shore of Lake Mirror, 1939, and some video.
I began uh videotaping my father in the late 70s, early 80s, and he has some wonderful stories that I think you'll enjoy.
So I'd be honored to do the parents.
Hi there.
I am just absolutely so moved by this book.
I'm I'm an avid fan of history and history of real people, and particularly of the migration coming to California.
My family settled in Arizona and up in the mountains of McNary and Tucson and Phoenix and Yuma and all of those places in the middle of the desert.
Yeah, yeah, it's and I mean it's a fascinating stories of how black folks got to be in the middle of the desert in the first place.
But one of the things I wanted to ask you was about the process.
I also work with senior citizens to get them to tell their stories about settling in places like Cochrane and those places like that in the cotton fields and fruit farms that are here in uh uh the Bay Area or in Northern California.
I was just wondering what kind of questions did you ask, and when you went through the interview process, and I know that this was a 15-year process, and old people do love to love to talk.
They love to give them an opportunity to tell their story and they're ready to tell it.
So I was just wondering what what kind of questions would you ask?
Well, when it comes to the 15 years, the 15 years was in segments.
You know, it was about two years of just interviewing the 1200, going all over the the country and going into senior centers and uh ARP meetings and uh Baptist churches in uh in New York where everybody was from South Carolina and of course Catholic churches in LA where everybody was from Louisiana and on and on.
So there was a lot of places that I went.
That's one of the things that took the time.
Another thing that took the time is that uh people have to tell the story in their own time, and for many of the people, remember, many of them don't want to talk, have not wanted to talk.
Um my mother was, as I said, one of the toughest interviews I had was my mother, who I am convinced still has not told me everything.
Um, but uh one of the things that I did with her, for example, was I I actually read every word of the book to her.
My father um passed away and did not live to see the day.
He would have been so proud to have seen this book.
But I did read it to her, who was then widowed, and um and what happened was I would read it, and she would start uh interrupting.
I mean, I couldn't get through a page because she said, Well, in Rome, you know, there goes Rome again, and so that was one way to get her to talk.
So, one of the challenges is just to make it comfortable for people to talk, because a lot of times they don't want to talk.
It's too painful.
When you describe these things, and we we talk about the absurdity of not being able to pass somebody on the road or that sort of thing.
But this was their lives.
This is what they had to live with for uh until uh they made the passage uh out of the South, and it was it was uh it it scarred them, and I think that a lot of this is almost like post-traumatic stress, so it takes a lot of time and patience, which is one reason why it wouldn't be just one interview, it would be many, many, many visits.
I would call them more visits than interviewing, and we would just talk about whatever they was on their minds at that moment.
I might throw out a topic about you know, tell me about you know when you got married or how you met your spouse, how did you meet your husband, and then they would start talking, and then we would ease into it, and then over time um other things would come out, and that's how I got the story.
There's a hand right there right here.
I think you actually uh answered uh the part of my question regarding uh getting those stories.
So I wanted to take a quick second to announce an event I'm doing.
Um, inspired by your book.
Uh, my boss, Alameda County supervisor Keith Carson, initiated a program where the last um three months we've been doing genealogy with youth in uh South Berkeley, uh West Oakland, and uh former foster youth.
So uh those uh young people will be uh telling their stories on June 4th at Malcolm X Elementary in uh Berkeley.
So I hope you all will come out and uh support those young people telling their stories.
And uh for the record, my family, my mother's side, Appalausis, Louisiana, and uh Jacksonville, Florida, my father's side by way of Detroit.
I I I have to say that you know, when I started this, people didn't talk like that.
And my goal was to have almost when you introduce yourself to describe what the background is because that is part of the identity, and it's embracing that identity and taking a sense of dignity from what that represents.
That means something, it means something.
Just saying where they're from means they had to come a long way.
That's the story in itself.
There's more to the story, but that says so much, and I I it just it just warms my heart to hear uh that we are embracing it and talking about that in that way, yes.
Um the question is about the migration from Gorye Island.
I have I have uh I have her obviously heard of at the door of no return, and um one of the things that I have uh come to to embrace with this book.
If you read it, you get a sense of it.
If you heard me speak, you get a sense of it, and I'll say it again.
We all have so much more in common than we've been led to believe.
We are all here because someone made a great leap of faith to jump off a cliff in the unknown.
I view all these migration streams as being reflective of the faith and the fortitude of the forebears who did this thing, and I don't see a difference between whether people came from the Caribbean or whether they came from Alabama.
Um the idea is they all we all came through uh great uh sacrifice and loss and homesickness and all of that, bringing the culture with us, having to recreate the culture wherever we landed, and it's that idea that I uh connect with.
The people in this book are merely proxies for what anyone whoever made the crossing has done.
The beauty of it is it gives us an idea because many for many people the the uh actual migration experience or immigration experience happened a long time ago, this is so recent, and yet it's complete that you get a chance to understand what was it like?
What did it take?
What would I have done?
I wanted it to come alive for readers.
These these people, these people are human beings doing what human beings do when they're faced with the circumstances that they were in.
And that's where I take my sustenance from it makes me feel a greater connection to all of humanity because it this to be human in some ways is to migrate ultimately one of the things that you that's so resonant about the experience of reading your book is you are the reader and communities across the country are inspired by what you written what you written.
I'd like to know what's your next project and also if your various meetings across the country what things have jumped off because of people reading the book the conversations being had because of the book what have what are those inspirational things that you see because it's it's certainly there's a way that your book has generated.
There is well first of all this is the book this is my book this is my version of the book this has been with me since September when the book came out I had no idea that it was going to that I would still be talking about the book to this degree at this point eight months into it and it doesn't appear to be uh coming to coming to an end because I'm booked through uh spring of 2013.
I cannot believe that so um when I I say that to say that the uh that it's become in some ways a uh a touch point for many groups to identify with there is a great discussion about immigration in this country it helps understand why people do a particular thing I would hope that it would help us to recognize the common humanity and all of us my name is I would hope that it would help people who are recent immigrants and uh see African American the African American experience experience is not as different from theirs as they might perceive it to be and that for other Americans to also see that that African Americans ended up doing forced ultimately to do what other groups have have chose to do.
And so there's so much commonality we have one of the things that I do know that it's being taken up by many many schools there are it it is crossed the ocean and is being read by very high level people in Europe who are looking at their own immigration situation with people with all the turmoil in North Africa coming into Europe so believe it or not that's what's going on there and I don't we don't know all where it will go because people are still reading it.
I mean it's a great leap of faith just to pick up the book because it's a big book you know and but I I hope you find that it it is um uh a pleasure to read because I worked really hard to try to make it that these people are beautiful people it is thank you so much and I think we can do a lot with our children if we talk to them about the situations in which we came from because with my daughter and son I said do you know why you like potato pie?
No I just know it's good.
I said well because blacks in the South years ago they didn't have money but desserts so therefore they used whatever they had that they had grown and put sugar in it and made it to me what they want I said that's where you got your potato pie that's where you got the red pudding that's where you got your rice pudding and all of those desserts, peach colour and all of that was from down south because my parents did not have money to buy sweets, so they made it themselves.
And just one other comment I can um I can um go back because it's very emotional for me because when you were talking about people trying to act white, my English teacher at Grambling was very light, fair skin, and she had a hair red.
She always colored it red for some reason, and she was very stiff, you know, she's just very educated.
She was on her way to Grambling to work one morning, and a group of white people forced her off the road between Grammy and Rustin and beat her up because they told her she was trying to act white.
So it was very emotional when you said that, because I pretty much had lived through a lot of things.
It was life and death.
This is real the reality.
Yeah.
Where to go, where not to go, and that's why I didn't appreciate BBK because we used to sneak off and go and visit again.
Yeah, I I wanted to uh, yes, excuse me.
I wanted to thank you so much for um, oh, okay.
I wanted to thank you so much for your book.
I migrated to California in 1951 when I was just 20 years old, and uh last week I got a chance to share my migration story with fourth graders, and they were very much uh very much uh interested in it.
Uh also there's hope after all.
Uh yes, yes, of course.
They were very, very much interested in it, with pictures of my family and so forth.
But I wanted to say also that I had the opportunity to connect my migration story and your story with the migration of one of my great-grandmothers who came over uh and lived as an enslaved person, and I knew her when I was a young child.
She died in 1939 when I was nine years old.
And so they got a chance to see a larger picture of the migration.
But thank you very much.
Well, thank you.
I think we have time for one more question.
You had started out earlier uh talking about how you make this story alive to young people, and I'd like for you to share that with us because I really would like to know because I know we talk to our kids and our grandchildren, but I like to hear how you share it and make it alive.
Well, the the uh well, one of them is to come up with these things that will that are connected to their lives, and one of them is driving is a big deal, you know, especially for for uh people who feel that no one can tell them how to drive.
Uh, and so that I I've looked for examples such as that.
Um, but I'm I'm struck by the uh a study that I uh came across uh after having completed the book that reminded me of even why I decided to do the book, and that was a study that showed that it was it was uh in North Carolina, as I'm recalling, one of the Carolinas, of uh, it happened to have been uh Mexican-American children, and they showed that the uh the self-esteem for the children rose when there was a discussion of actually their culture and their background.
In other words, once they embraced their culture and their background, recognizing that they were American, but they also had other parts of themselves that could strengthen them in some way, and their self-esteem measurements of self-esteem actually rose.
Now, the thing is that for many African American children, that may not be occurring because the assumption is well they're American and you know they know the story already.
Well, actually, they don't know the story.
There's no way you could truly know the story.
Uh, and I it reminded me of why I decided to do the book to begin with.
The idea, you know, going way back, I'm thinking about how when I was in school, my mother got me in the best school that she could because she valued education that people actually truly valued education because it had been denied them.
And so she got me in a diverse school, a very good school in Washington, DC, with many, many people from all over the world.
And so there many of them were diplomats, children, or anyway, they were a lot of so-called immigrants.
And I found myself identifying with the immigrant children.
I found myself feeling that you know we'd open up our um lunch boxes and our lunch boxes were different from the other children.
Other children might have grilled cheese sandwiches.
Well, my mother made um every single day.
She had Vienna sausages on Wonder Bread with Miracle Whip.
Yeah.
And she she actually pronounced it, it was not pronounced Vienna Sasha's, they were pronounced Vina sausage.
Yes.
So every day I would open it up, and there was.
It's the same thing.
It was Vienna sausages on Wonder Bread with Miracle Whip every single day.
She was, and she was doing this.
Was her understanding her translation of what she thought northerners would be eating.
This was an upgrade in her mind.
And so I identified with the horror of opening this up and seeing what it was.
And then I had immigrant friends who were opening up things that might be curried or something else or very spicy with some things that other children were not having.
And so I identified with that, but I didn't realize why.
And that is because we had a similar experience of being newcomers, the children of newcomers in a new world.
And so that's how I became, you know, going obviously at the time I didn't recognize that I was gonna go and write a book.
But to answer your question, I didn't realize on certain days where people would start talking about how their grandparents or great grandparents have come from the old country and done this and done that and made something of themselves.
I didn't realize that the same could be said for people who had done what my parents had done.
I didn't realize that.
I didn't realize I would be quiet on those days and not know what to say.
And I didn't realize that we had stories to tell too.
So thank you very much.
Today we'll be talking with my good friend Cheryl Fabio to discuss her latest documentary, Evolutionary Blues, West Oakland's Music Legacy.
Sherald is an East Oakland native.
She has a BA from Fisk University in Nashville, an MA from Stanford, and a JD from JFK University School of Law, which is where we met and where we had many, many vibrant legal discussions.
Welcome to the program, Cheryl, and congratulations on a great film.
Thank you.
Please give us a brief synopsis of Evolutionary Blues.
It's a film about West Oakland.
It's a film about the Great Migration.
But it's also the film, a film about um the music that came with the people who migrated here.
So it's uh a real rich culture.
It's kind of a defining to me a c a defining um description of the culture of Oakland.
So folks came here from places like Louisiana, Texas, Oklahoma, Alabama, and living in this dense community impacted each other and kind of shared their music styles.
West Oakland was very dense in those days.
And a new sound kind of evolved.
The other thing that's interesting to me is that it was at a moment where we kind of went from acoustic music to electric music.
So that was in the mix too.
So our story starts in the 40s, the late forties and kind of picks up, talks about some of those early musicians and then brings us through, we interview 30, at least 30, 35 local musicians and just talk about how music in Oakland evolved.
And there's also a real interesting Oakland political story that's being told in it.
So we've woven together the migration story, this politics of Oakland and the music and and I have to say I really think that those musicians came out and shared their stories beautifully so.
It's a combination of all three of those things.
Sounds like you have a personal connection with the blues.
You know it's funny because I don't think of it.
I don't I mean I'm a consumer but I don't think of it.
But in the process of making this film, my mother definitely had a relationship with the blues and you know you kinda well she write about it.
She actually has an album that's called Juju's Alchemy of the blues but she was fascinat she's Southern so she was fascinated.
She followed that track and through osmosis I think I came along with it because as in making the film I realized oh I know that person I and it's it wasn't a conscious I knew their music.
But I knew their music and stuff and so that was a really interesting discovery for me how I think of myself as someone who loves music.
I used to love dancing and all of that but I had never taken the time to figure out what was behind that music.
So this for me and maybe for all of us that worked on the film was an opportunity to look behind the music.
I was about to say that we all grew up with but I think that I grew up with because everybody else who helped make it other than those uh musicians is younger.
So while I'm looking at what was behind the music I think that everybody else was being exposed to this music and but you know actually the blues is the start of American music.
All American musical forms came from the blues.
So even younger musicians they may not know that they that their roots are in the blues.
So I think this is a good thing for them to be involved in the I think you're absolutely right and I think even though our film kind of ends with the uh transition into uh DJ driven music and some of the very early rap you can extend that evolution into hip hop into rap music and all of that and once you understand the concept of it absolutely and it's been interesting for me when we show it actually our audiences are often we call them gray hairs people like me but when young people show up they also are making that bridge and that connection and to me that's so meaningful because what they're doing then takes this uh leap backward and connects to an ancestral past that often in this fast moving culture we don't realize how connected we are to that ancestral past.
So you know the other thing is I don't know that I ever thought about how spiritually involved, blues and R and B and all of that is.
And um when I when I watch the film now, I I feel that I get connected to that part of it and and I hope that other people do as well, but it's been a joy for me.
The blues were born in Mississippi and only a place like Mississippi culturally could have produced a music art form like the blues.
I don't think the blues could have come from any other place.
It comes from a a p a point of pain and jo and and joy, misery and suffering, but also um strength and independence and just a positive outlook on life that we that the people that created the blues could do that out of this situation that they were in.
But you know, I'm gonna say that I don't think it was just in Mississippi.
I think that the people who you're talking about in Mississippi we showed up in other places in Louisiana in Texas where people were all over the South actually.
Any place that they were doing sort of plantation type uh economies Africans who came to this country were working through the pain and suffering and the ridiculousness of the situation they found themselves in and we're musical people and so people were um making music out of you know, you had what you had and you had to create absolutely and so that's what's interesting about this film and each of the places in Louisiana maybe there were horns and you know people use things that had a metallic kind of sound going on, other stuff as well.
But when I think now of Louisiana and the music from Louisiana, I'm expecting to hear some horns someplace.
I'm expecting, you know, some harmonicas and stuff like that.
So each in in Texas and I still am not a music historian but in Texas I'm expecting to hear some piano or or did you know all this before you made the film at all.
Not at all.
And that's why it was such uh you know it it was such a treat for me because when you do a film it took us two years to do this.
Actually it feels like I'm still doing the film and it's about to show on television and so you know it's not done until it's done but in getting through all of that all of us went from, you know, zero to something and I think the thing that's most interesting to me is that we were lucky we had a community who embraced us in making that film so that we had help along the way.
And I remember at one point there was um some controversy about whether or not so and so was actually an Oakland artist.
Well I had three or four advisors that I could get what do you think?
What do you think?
What do you think?
And then I could take all of those voices together and make a decision about yes we are going to include this person as an Oakland based musician.
The other thing to me that was really inspiring about this film is, you know, as a kid, uh my brother was only a year older than me but he was an adventurous kind of guy.
So he'd come home and tell me all these stories about so and so he saw in Seventh Street and all that and like well how come I don't know any of this truly and um yeah I'd hear about James Brown and all in my head I'm wondering well where are they coming to you know it was a mystery.
But what I came to understand was how this influx of talent to Seventh Street but more than that, not only were people coming in, BB King, James Brown and all those people, but they were coming specific specifically here because the bands were so notorious.
They'd come, they'd find talent they'd pick off our talent and and put them in their group and go on.
Or just come and play and pick up some of the flavor of Oakland and incorporate well B.
King is really well known for that.
Did you see any of these people when you were growing up?
Not in Oakland but I did in the in in the world and and that that's where I'm saying that starting the film I just thought, okay well I'm g I'm about to learn something and of course I did, but I also realized well I I did listen to so and so and and you know, so it it for me it operates on a lot of different levels.
You took a break from filmmaking.
What was it like to get back in the director's scene?
I was so glad to come back to film.
And I say that because you know that break was I don't know that I volunteered for the break, but I did for ten years.
I was out doing other things.
I went to law school and uh of course that's why we're connecting, but yes.
The and I gained a lot in law school in terms of how I think about things, how I do research and all of that, but coming back it was like I can breathe and I can beat again.
So how'd the film come to be?
What made you decide to do it or were how did it happen?
Yeah.
So K-top is the government channel and their mission is to tell Oakland stories.
So um I think Michael and Meadow and the rest of the crew had been thinking about doing this because there's a guy named Ronnie Stewart who's um the executive director of the West Coast Blues Society.
They'd been talking about doing this film, so they knew they needed to tell a story about West Oakland, and there was an interest in having blues in it.
But after that, how to tell this story was um kind of unknown.
Yeah, how did you prepare for it?
Well, so first m let me just say that Michael needed someone, so that he's the executive producer of it came to me and said, you know, I think we really need somebody who might have been close or living in the times that we're talking about in this film, and I thought, oh God, this is a great opportunity to do something about something that is fascinating to me, right?
So that's how we started.
So it's a project of K-tops, and uh they came to me because I'm the old one, no.
They came to me because you know, maybe I would have some um experience in the times that we're describing, and I think that was a really smart move.
I didn't quite understand why then, but it made a lot of difference in in creating the film that I could filter whether or not it was ringing true or not.
Right, right.
So um that's how it came about.
How did you prepare?
Well, you know, there's this so the place that we started, um, Ronnie Stewart and his group had talked to Keta, and I started maybe having an interview with him.
I I went and just spoke with him for a couple of hours.
West Coast Blue Society.
West Coast Blues Society, right?
And you know, they have uh walk of fame in front of uh the West Oakland Bart.
That's right.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
I was down there the other day, walking along the walk of fame.
You know, had you known that it was there?
No, no.
Because you always take that Barton.
Yeah, but I think that might be new, but anyway, I was walking out the other day.
You know, that has been there for a while.
That's kind of new.
And they're and they're extending it as well.
But there's a list not only of the people that are on that walk of fame, but also the people that you know, in time he expects to put in the walk of fame.
I think it's a wonderful idea.
Well, it is because then there's a place to start from, and that's where I started from.
So from that list, uh also I would go to the Oakland history room and the uh librarian, oh you have to talk to Lee Hildebrand.
And I thought, okay.
So they gave me his number, I called him, and he's sort of the journalist that moved through.
Yeah, he moved.
You know, people like that, if there was nobody connected to the media, nobody knew would know about the performances that were happening or any of that.
So Lee did a lot of the writing, he had the media connections and all of that.
So I spoke with him, I met actually I met through Lee Hildebrand, Pat Monaco, who did the photographs we used in the opening sequence and uh just amazing photographs, and you you think about wow, how did she just happen to take a camera and go to Seventh Street and photograph?
They're really beautiful photographs.
Um, and then I met they took me to an event for Bob Gettings, and Bob Giddings Jr.
was there, it was honoring his father, who had one of the major recording studios for uh blues on Seventh Street.
And then after that, one person tells you about another person, and you know, when I think about this film, there West Oakland was dense with talent.
This film picks up on a particular track, so we could have gone on any number of tracks, but we sort of followed a particular group, so they knew who was in there um in their lineage and would introduce me and you know, who's still around, who's not around, um so it sort of took its own course and we just had to be good listeners and good followers and this is a small community and they have relationships with each other.
So for me, uh I had a lot of different levels of experience with it and sometimes it would be a plus, sometimes it would be a minus.
I think what was really interesting was because it's l like a family, there are times when you're on the outs and there's times when when you're instrumental to keeping the family going forward, and so I experienced a lot of that, like who's mad at who and and you know, all of that, but I was really impressed that when people came and got on our studio stage they were really in the higher ground.
And you know, at some point I didn't even know about um what's what's that show in in LA, they'd say, Oh, you're doing like unsung.
I had never even heard of Unsung, but Unsung kind of gets into the uh background who married who and who divorced and all of that stuff.
I'm not interested in that.
And so it was really refreshing music.
It was really refreshing that none of that was an issue and the accolades they shared, even though they they went to a place where they were really telling this story and it felt like it was a story that was waiting to be told, right?
Because it was very polished in editing it.
I mean, we had 80 hours of v uh video that we had to edit.
But once we found the structure, eighty hours and I could have watched an eighty hour film, but once we found the structure for it, the pieces could they fell together, you know.
I mean, we still had to spend a lot of time editing it down, but they kind of fell together because this story that was being told, it really is a story that has continuity to it.
There was a scene.
Well, couple of scenes, but I remember one scene in particular, I don't know who it was that was speaking, maybe four or five musicians, and they were all sitting around talking about the first time they heard each other, how they the one and one or two of them would say, Oh, you were my mentor, I looked up to you, I love what you did.
There was a higher ground, it was.
We would watch these cats that were out there doing it, like the Ballards and Eddie Falls doing Johnny Talbot's band.
Matter of fact, we named our first band D Emeralds, 'cause Johnny it was Johnny Talbot and D Things.
But Ron Ron Wells, uh first time I saw him, we were at a talent show at the Oakland Auditorium and Ron Wells was sitting on the drums and he was just backstage playing with him before they went on.
He wasn't a drummer in the band at the time.
But he you know, these were all his homies.
I said, Who's that cat?
That was my first time seeing you, man.
My first time.
Yeah, Oakland Auditorium Theater.
Right, right.
So these cats are like, you know, role models for me.
That scene, I I didn't really know if that was gonna work, but at some point, you know, what I realized is a lot of the people that we interviewed are what I think of as the front people.
So the singer, the band leader and all of that.
But then there's also a world of who are the musicians that support that front person.
So, you know, we pull together four people who would be willing to share share the stage.
Um not necessarily because I knew that they were connected, but West Oakland is such a small community that if they were out playing music, you knew there there was gonna be a some kind of connection.
And no matter what the story is that's being told in that sequence, I think what you do get is the sense of the comm camaraderieship.
Definitely.
And and even when, you know, because this is people's livelihood, it's their talent.
So to be somebody like that, you have to have an ego.
Right.
And yet how do all of these egos me absolutely and um so I really when it came I think at some point we had about two hours and a half of of film.
We had it we had a cut down to there and I still had an hour to cut out of it.
That was the hardest part to cut because that part of feeling how that this camaraderieship goes on, you know, that's the one that I really wanted to stay with and play out.
I'm glad you did because that was maybe well I had many parts that I like, but I really like that part.
So you say you worked on the film for two years.
How'd you keep it fresh while you were working on it.
So first of all the uh technology is uh changed oh in the two years the way well it had changed uh since my oh working in film ten years before that right so the editor who's here at K-top uh we worked in Premiere Pro and we could email this film back and forth.
That was fascinating to me.
Um so the way we approached working.
Yeah it really it really was that I could be home in my pajamas.
She could be here basically during the work day working send it to me.
I could s you know I'd work on it at night because I had a different job during the day and send it back to her and that way uh you had not only two people working on it but instant uh kind of critiquing of what was happening this works this doesn't work and all that that was so refreshing but the way we worked on it because there's so many different stories it's kinda like in two minute increments.
So it wasn't until it started getting to the end of it that I would start pulling back or I suspect you know the editor is actually uh detailed very an amazing editor to work with me I would stay focused on the two minutes and then near the end I could pull back and start saying oh so what is the overarching story?
So because though it was two minute by two minute by two minute it didn't get stale.
It was I was always working on something new for two minutes.
For two minutes right but you know two minutes might take you two or three weeks to to get it right.
So um a really amazing process and then also at all points during it uh we had an amazing researcher who used to work here at K Top as well and uh Tanisha and she would show up with new photographs or video that she had found out in the field.
So there was always something new coming into this.
Not to mention the fact again we were working with interviews that were two hour interviews pulling them down to two minutes.
Two minutes.
So there was always there was always something new and uh you know you asked me earlier how many times I've seen it it must be ten million.
But when I watch it because now I'm watching the whole film I uh I I watch it new each time even though I can recite everything they're saying I'm mumbling.
Goodness I'm glad nobody's sitting next to me but uh I'm mumbling all through it saying saying the line.
So that that process so the process itself was nice and fresh for me.
You premiered the film here at the iconic Grand Lake Theater and you sold out.
The were you expecting it to sell out well I knew we had to be at a place like the Grand Lake Theater because we had forty musicians in the film and I just figured well you know they m they're connected to other people and all of their people are gonna want to come.
So we need a big theater.
But I have to say the experience of selling out a six hundred the a seat theater is uh beyond me.
You know, it was the surprise.
It was not it was I remember when I saw um the ticket count and it now is sold out, it was like, hey you guys, we sold this out.
Because you know, it's also a a financial risk.
Except that I knew that there were all these people that they're really they were a icon of their times, and so there were gonna be people who wanted to see.
I was there, there was a buzz, really.
There was a buzz in the in the audience.
Well, the buzz was the folks who showed up, not only to that screening but to other screenings like the musicians, the families, the audiences and all of that, this was their story.
And uh it's a story that belonged to them.
And I I'd say that as a crew, the biggest compliment is when a musician from that time comes up and says, you know, you told the story of my life, and they're in tears.
That happens so frequently.
But it not only happens here, we've traveled around with it, and uh like in Louisiana, for some reason Louisiana was very connected to the Oakland experience.
You saw those people from Louisiana who live in Oakland.
But that it goes back the other way is interesting to me.
So they also were feeling like uh, yeah, you've really told the story, like you've extended this musical conversation that usually leaves out Oakland.
But um How'd that make you feel?
I I I always, you know, as the the director, so the thing about this film also is that I really appreciate all of the skills that it takes, all of the people, you know, not only skills on our crew, but someone who's cataloging negatives from that time shows up and says here and all of a sudden the value of your film goes up because now you're really in the time.
I mean, I've come to um just be excited about what a collaboration of film like this calls for.
But the biggest the biggest honor is when multiple times, I mean, we've shown it locally maybe twenty or thirty times, and there's always a handful at least, if not a whole audience, like that six hundred seat theater, of people who say you've told the story of my time.
And uh I saw people singing and dancing in their seats at the premiere.
Well, you know, not not only that, but behind me when I was sitting in the audience, there was a lady, well that's so-and-so, and that's so yeah.
These r it you know, for me, because maybe we're showing a photograph with because I don't know, um Lold, you know, Lowell is in it or or some other musician were focused on them and there's other people, the audience is telling you who's in the frame.
And that was really delightful, and um and really an honor.
I mean, I think for everyone who's worked on this film, and not that it's a perfect film because w we certainly didn't have a perfect budget.
So we made a film on about a sixth of what it would take to make a film like this, but we made it and everybody showed up with their A game, and so I think we've we've accomplished we've accomplished the goal.
So we've been talking on camera and off about the blues, about the different genres.
So this movie obviously is about Oakland blues.
Um do you think that that this is enough to give a casual listener observer um an overall idea what the blues is?
Well, I think that this is enough to place you in the geography of the west coast.
Uh and you know, Oakland, so not only in terms of Oakland, I think there was some synergy between Oakland and Los Angeles.
Um, so you do have a sense of what was going on in the West Coast, which isn't really talked about.
The West Coast is kind of dismissed in terms of the creative impulses that come out here.
But I when I after this film, what I really recognize and Isabel Wilkerson helped me see this, you had to be somebody special to leave wherever you, you know, you had been, your your family had been for generations, and come to a place like the West Coast because there was no information about it.
So yeah, I think that these were like real I think t the m migration is often a flow of people who are entrepreneurial, they're independent and all of that.
But you almost had to be cuckoo to come to the West Coast.
I mean, really hyper interpreted.
I'm interrupting you now because Interrupt me.
And because what's happening now with people leaving their homes all over the world to get to a safer, better place.
I've always felt that nobody leaves home just to leave home.
It's always a reason for you to go.
You leave your people that look like you to speak your language that they eat the same food you do that have the same back memory that you have and you go someplace that you know nothing about and there's nobody there for you.
It's always you're always a special person to leave.
Well I think that but see th I think that's absolutely true.
But when you grown up so I went to school in Nashville and I was just shocked by the fact that you could get in a car and move through four or five states in the matter of a day.
In California you get in a car and you're driving forever and you're still in California.
So this this um idea of coming here and in television, you know, in those days if there wasn't television for the beginning of that migration and then it was like these wild west movies and and not many people of color showing up in that.
So there was really a void of what you were coming to.
You had no idea.
You had a better idea of what Chicago was going to be looking like and some idea of what uh New York and Harlem and stuff like that and of course through the South, you know, you had family moving around a little bit, not that much but some.
But coming out here, you just really had to have your chops about you and really know that given any situation you'd be able to make it and not only make it for yourself but then pull your family and bring them out to and make a success of it.
And make a success So um you let the m musicians speak for themselves in the movie instead of having a voice over narrator why was that important to you?
Did you set out to do it that way?
Oh absolutely I mean, you know, I came into film at a time where narrator well I have always worked in documentary film.
Mm-hmm and narrators were always and also this narrator voice was this voice from deep man.
Right.
And Deep Man it was kind of like the voice of God really framing it for you and all of that.
So my introduction to film was sort of a revolution against that and um we call it first voice film.
So that's the way that is that voice.
Well that's what my that's in my head anyway.
Um so it's their story not mine.
And that gave me the freedom to not be presumptuous that I knew something about it or gave me the license to be honest that I don't know what what this story is but I had all confidence that we could get it made if they would tell us the story.
And um that kind of goes back to people trusting because th this is a group of people who had I mean every time I hear something about a musician from the forty well at any point but really that forties through the eighties they have been used used and abused and stolen from and underpaid and all of that stuff.
So trust is an issue.
Um there is a place in it and I can't say exactly when, but there was a place in it where I felt like okay maybe it was after we had done a number of the interviews and I could see that people would come and sit in the chair and just go on and talk.
Just have a conversation and you know the trust is that whatever it is they said I would do well by them, right?
Uh or we would do well by them, that we weren't looking to do anything funny with it.
We weren't looking to exploit and um just tell the story and I really appreciated um how in film in in the moment of doing this, how much of someone's life is being turned over to some other person to frame it, right?
Right.
So for me it was inf important that the frame was their frame and that my job was to help the crew find the way to tell their story.
Um yeah so that was you did you did that was the goal.
So you brought in a lot of social commentary uh you had uh some historians actually on film.
Why was that important for you?
It was my chance to because I'm from Oakland, um after my family moved around from being in the s uh service you're claiming Oakland that's right I absolutely and you know and actually even the fact that I have to claim Oakland is part of why there had to be this history because when I was interviewing uh Isabel Wilkerson part of the conversation was that you know as someone who's a Oakland transplant I've been here since maybe nineteen fifty six um you had to claim it because there have been people here since the eighteen hundreds black people who'd been here since the and the new the newer you are you're kind of looked at suspiciously so there's always this uh sense of replacing you know pushing out the older generation or replacing or newcomers changing the cultural environment and all of that so there's an inner story that I was exploring about the black community here.
But also the political story of how that migration affects the city of Oakland because Oakland was actually a very segregated place.
It was a pretty mean spirited place.
They uh brought folks here to work uh for the war effort but then once the economy tanked because the war effort was over they wanted you to go back home because they didn't want you taking their jobs.
When they came here to California, when they came here to Oakland they were met with tremendous resistance.
And this resistance came in the form of often violence when they saw to move into a neighborhood that was outside the prescribed places assigned to them in each of these cities.
And then there was redlining which meant that the government would not permit loans in the places where African Americans lived.
So I remember as a kid a lot of tension and as an adult trying to say that to other people they wouldn't necessarily understand what I'm talking about.
Even though you know I think well why wouldn't you because the Panthers grew up here I mean this has always been a very politically they didn't happen in a vacuum there was a reason for them to start absolutely absolutely and when you think about how ferociously the uh Panthers did everything they did from the children's programs on there had to be a backstory to that.
So this was an opportunity for me to put a little bit of that into the mix of telling this story and I remember we we lucked up on getting an interview with Robert Self who's a historian at Brown University.
Don't worry about it.
Don't worry about it.
And it's important in this story where you can see how the culture is shifting and the music is shifting with it.
And I think that that's the story not only here but that's the story of music and culture.
That's because music records the culture.
Music doesn't happen in a vacuum either.
Absolutely.
Um getting back to the editing process, um is there any story that didn't make the film that you can share with us?
One of the stories that I really regret not having in um Bob Gettings Jr.
is i we his interview is about a two hour interview and he's telling us about his own career but what we use in the film actually helps us enliven his father who recorded the blues and that's the reason we can have the conversation fifty years later is because we now have samples of the music.
But he tells some hilarious stories about just how ingenious his dad was and uh he made a television set and and uh Bob will say that he's looking at this little square and there's these people in there and he's try he's a kid trying to figure out you know how are those people in there?
That's such a uh moment in time and we just couldn't structure it into the story that we're telling in the ninety minutes but I like the story about the the handmade guitar.
Thank you for putting that in the film.
It was good.
It was it was nice.
You know, I that really made it because f two things.
One is that it's such an illustration of having a desire to do something and doing it in spite of everything.
So I also but also because I remember uh Wood Shop in high school.
You don't have wood shop anymore.
But that was an opportunity for a teacher to open up the dreams of someone such that whether or not his dad meant to buy him a guitar, it put it on his radar because he had invested that.
The other thing though is that this person in the seventh grade would know that that was gonna be his lifelong vocation.
And most of the people in this film started when they were like 10, 12, and they're professionally playing at twelve.
That's mind boggling to me because uh you know, at that age I think I was a brat doing whatever brats.
Absolutely, I own it.
I own it.
Yes.
And and they had started that and we were living in the same place, like that just to me takes such a focus, and you know, I guess uh that's the creative spirit coming out.
For the past year you've been on the film festival circuit.
What's that been like?
Hmm.
Well, that's interesting.
It it has been because it's taken me places that I probably would never have gone to.
Um and it's also been, you know, I used to work for Black Filmmakers Hall of Fame here in Oakland, and we had a film festival at a time when there weren't many black film festivals.
I'm trying to think there was probably a handful of them around the the country, but there are so many, like, you know, in deciding where to submit, I there was some point where I said, There's no way I can digest all of this.
Because, you know, in the film world and my permissions with music, I had a limited time that we could be in film festivals.
So I had to make oh yeah, I had to make these decisions, I had to meet their deadlines, and it was so much that I just said, Well, will our film do well here?
Is this an audience I need it to be in?
So we've been to Louisiana, we've been to Texas, and it was wonderful because there was an affirmation people there would recognize, yep, yep, yep, we influenced that Oakland stuff.
Right, I know that sounds yeah.
We've so we've gone really interesting places locally.
We've done Pan African film festival in LA and we're about to take it to Rwanda.
Rwanda.
Absolutely.
But the thing is we made this film to show here on K-top.
And it's had this other life.
I'm really delighted with that.
You sound surprised.
Because we made a we made a project.
You know, I'm surprised that it's a ninety-minute feature film.
Um I think we're all pleased with how well crafted the film is and what we were able to get out of everybody who gave to the film, and that the places that are disconnected from Oakland, one might think, are actually very connected because it's the music.
Well, it's both the music, but also this is not an uncommon story.
So the story that we're telling about the city of Oakland, the introduction, the desegregation, the resegregation, all of that stuff shows up in places all around and now around the world.
Yes.
A dejected people.
Um with something to offer that changes the larger culture for the better.
Yeah.
I'm s always surprised and impressed and so and just for want of a better word, proud, when I go around the world and I see um our music in places where you wouldn't even expect it to be.
Briefly, tell us your favorite thing or moment from the film.
My favorite thing or moment.
Well, briefly.
Uh not so briefly.
Right.
Well, there's actually many m actually I think most of the moments are my favorite moments.
But I think something that people don't speak out loud is when Sonny Rhodes tells his story about being a kid uh in um Texas and some white musicians have come back.
And he and he actually does cry in the in the thing, but and he doesn't cry.
I mean, even the crying is that this wound is still a fresh wound, right?
And he's a very sensitive man and he and he gets, you know, emotional about these moments in his life.
But he tells this story that's so honest, so raw and so true, but it's also s there's so much resilience in it.
Where he says he takes this challenge that uh these men say something terrible to a twelve year old, and that sparks him, and now he's you know, in his seventies, maybe older than that, and he's still he's accomplished what that twelve-year-old boy wanted him to accomplish.
That's that's a chilling moment for me.
But I also have to say that I equally get the chills from the story about the handmade guitar because again, that's a kid who's saying, Oh, I want to do that.
And then he spends his life doing it.
Uh, there's there's something about the tenacity of uh these musicians.
There's something about their ability to see forward.
There there's recognize this thing that's stirring in.
Absolutely.
And I think that creative spirit is, you know, people who've got it can relate to it.
The rest of the world must not be able to, because I think we would embrace people who've got talent like that.
We'd embrace them more, more.
So have you won some awards?
You did what a couple couple of awards.
We did.
We uh in in uh Denton, Texas, we won an award there.
Uh we're also being honored.
Um, I think that's the end of September.
Well, the uh it's partners in preservation.
It's kind of the Oakland Historical Society Award.
So we're getting an award for that.
Not only the crew, but also the advisors who help shape the film.
And uh we're gonna be at Mill Valley Film Festival.
I mean, we've we've actually gotten to go places that are pretty amazing.
And the the trip to Rwanda is that it's been nominated um in the festival there, as nominated, it hasn't won, but as the uh best diaspora documentary film.
So you know, to to even get a mention.
There's so much product out there.
To get a mention is is truly an honor.
Right, right.
So what's next for you?
What's next for me?
Well, you know, I've never really been able to guide my life.
My life shows up the way that it shows up.
So I think that's most of most of us.
Well, good.
I mean, because people talk to me like that's unusual, but mine takes its own course.
Um I'm doing a little work.
I've d spent the summer doing writing, getting proposals.
You know, I have a nonprofit that uh it's not just about the projects that I want to do, but some of the other people I think the success of this project.
What if you're nonprofit is it's uh Sarah Webster Fabio Center for Social Justice.
We named it after your mother after my mother in honor of my mother.
But there's other projects popping up and coming into our nonprofit that are really exciting, and I think that success kind of begets success, and I can't wait to see where that goes and and how other people realize some, you know, some goal, some dream of theirs.
Thank you for being here today, Cheryl.
It's a pleasure talking with you.
And thank you for watching.
The Bay Area is famous for its bridges, which makes sense.
The Golden Gate and the Bay Bridge are instantly recognizable icons.
But the most interesting bay crossing isn't one you'll see on postcards or in the movies.
And for fifty years, it has been carrying hundreds of thousands of riders across the bay every single day.
To build the tube, engineers decided on the immersed tube method of construction.
Fifty-seven pre-made sections, each averaging three hundred and thirty feet long, were floated into place and lowered into a trench on the bay floor.
When it was completed, the Trans Bay tube was the longest underwater transit tunnel in the world, and it was the longest and deepest immersed tube tunnel up until twenty ten.
If the tube were laying on some bedrock, an earthquake could cause stress and undue issues within the tube.
And if there's an earthquake, they can shift, rotate, and even get longer by several inches, all while keeping the tube connected and dry.
Good afternoon, everybody.
If anybody's gonna want to speak on an item or for public comment, open forum, please come down and sign a speaker's card.
And Alicia, if we're ready, I think we could go ahead and call the meeting for order.
Uh would you call it?
Thank you so much.
Uh good afternoon, members of the Privacy Advisory Commission and uh members of the public.
Uh today is October second um twenty twenty twenty twenty five meeting of the privacy advisory commission and I will start with a roll call.
Uh Commissioner Wang.
Here.
Commissioner Hoffer.
Commissioner Katz.
Commissioner Tomlinson.
Here.
Commissioner Everhart.
Here.
Commissioner Vice Chair Gage.
And Chair Levitt.
Here.
Um Chair, you have a quorum.
I'll turn it over to you.
Thank you so much.
Um our next item is open forum, which is public comment on items that are not on the agenda.
So if anybody either filled out a speaker's card or is on Zoom and would like to speak on an item that is not on the agenda, this is the time to do so.
And I think we'll give everybody one minute for comment, and I believe for all the items.
Thank you, Chair.
There are okay, I have one uh speaker card in the room for open forum.
Um, Mr.
Twan.
You can begin your comments now.
Chair, I have advised that you have one minute.
And Chair, there are two hands raising.
Thank you so much.
I have come before this privacy commission, I think two, three years ago, raising concerns over mass uh surveillance program without uh consent, and that is the rent registry.
Personal identifying information, including name, addresses, financial information collected without consent and being stored by the city of Oakland.
We all know the City of Oakland was hacked and that private personal identification information, including names, credit cards, addresses, were dumped on the dark web.
I have raised this concern publicly on Oakland on this privacy commission, on various city public forum meetings, and there's nothing done to address this in the meantime and this information is what ICE needs along with some sometimes fingerprint data that they get at the border when people try to cross.
Maybe they didn't successfully cross the first time, but the second and third time they did.
We are a sanctuary city, ICE doesn't know where they live, but with this rent registered information, they do know where you live and they have a fingerprint data, so they could break up families.
We have about sixty thousand immigrants, Latinos, working, lower class working folks working in a restaurant, part of bio vital economic engine, and we need to address this is super critical important.
Is there anybody else in the room who was wanting to speak during open forum?
Mr.
Um Escobar, you didn't state on your speaker card, which item you want to speak on, uh, the flock cameras, as far as what we are uh aware of.
Jump in real fast.
Could you identify yourself?
I'm Edward Escobar, and I'm the founder of Citizens Unite and the Coalition for Community Engagement.
Okay.
And are you wanting to speak on the camera item?
Because that is on the agenda.
Or if you I'm I just heads up, but if you if you want to speak on whatever you want, but the this is the time for speaking on non-agendized items.
Yeah, we're we're talking about the capture.
Well, I mean, that's one I'm here on.
Is the is regarding the license plate readers that they're not capturing.
The license plate readers.
Okay, feel free to go.
Yeah, they're not capturing the uh the uh personal identifying traits, and basically it's license plate reader as it states, um, and it's not capturing biometrics or anything of that nature.
And this is uh assured to us by uh the state being a sanctuary state and Oakland being a sanctuary city.
Noel Gallo even confirmed that numerous times when we had a most recent uh press event, um, and that was disclosed in front of the media several times.
So we want to clarify that that is as the fact and that we should not be exploiting uh immigrants uh to remove safety public safety videos uh that help to increase public safety for uh the people of Oakland and also too that work in in conjunction with other municipalities as uh vehicles go from one city to the next.
Um we we need to reduce the exposure that people have and also that impacts people of color mostly, and I'm Hispanic, so I have great concerns about that.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Is there anybody else in the room who signed up to speak for Open Forum?
Make comments on items not on the agenda.
Okay, we had a couple on Zoom, I think you said yes.
There are two on on Zoom.
Um Rajni Uh Mandal, I will allow you to talk.
And you can unmute yourself.
Hello, I'm Rajni Mandel from District 4.
Oakland civilian oversight bodies are some of the strongest in the nation.
This privacy advisory commission was created by advocacy groups, including two members of the commission.
They also had a hand in the surveillance ordinance, which at the time was considered the strongest surveillance ordinance in the country with powers to review all city policies.
It requires OPD to submit the use policies and impact reports before it goes to council.
So it is not only an advisory body, you are also a gatekeeper.
This commission can also draft policies and legislation, such as the draft no stolen data ordinance, which gives this commission new authority on data security and breaches.
It weaponizes this commission beyond its intended oversight role, turning it from a surveillance review body into a broad procurement and cybersecurity regulator.
Taking authority from part portions of our city government.
I bring the public and the city's attention to what oversight bodies such as this one are doing versus what they were actually intended for, as they extend beyond their charter mandate.
And I do not think unelected volunteers should have so much power in our city government.
It's oversight bodies such as this one, which are delaying the implementation of new technologies and policies that directly affect public safety.
We as a city are in a public safety crisis, and these delays are partly to blink.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Um, speaking your comments, yes.
My name is Tedros Hailea, and I'm the vice chair of Melrose 27 Next Neighborhood Council.
Um Oakland's population is 440,000, and with 550 Oakland police officers on active duty with 12 hour shifts, that's about one officer for every two thousand citizens at any given time.
Our police need any and every advantage that they can get from installed flock cameras.
I'd also like to say that the privacy concerns of a small minority of people are also unfounded because flock cameras do not record faces or use facial technology technology facial recognition technology.
They're designed to capture license plates and vehicle characteristics.
So essentially toll booth cameras record about the same in information as flock cameras.
So I'm asking that the privacy advisory committee please keep the flock cameras in place and keep Oakland safer.
We need all the help we can get.
Thank you.
Anybody else speak on non-agenda items?
No chair.
I'm sorry.
Thank you so much.
That closes open forum.
Our um first action item is an annual report on the crime tracer forensic project.
Good evening, Sergeant Sal.
Um we brought this over on the last meeting.
And there were some questions regarding uh data that was uh share or other agency that have data to uh crime tracer.
So we follow up with crime tracer, and as I turn your pen attention to page three, we receive additional information on crime tracers or not on what um data is shared with uh what partner agencies, and we also obviously have access to these data as well because they're shared and it's listed on there.
Um, various different regions in the um in in the country.
And also there was a question on federal agencies.
Uh federal agencies are using crime tracer with limited licensing, meaning that not every one of their agents assign a login by default, uh, usually it's uh particular task forces that gets assigned logins.
Uh I don't have access in view into what task forces assign what.
Um, but they do tell me crime tracer does tell us that the agency that uses crime tracer are FBI, ATF, DA, the postal inspectors, the marshals, and secret service.
Um that was what was changed on this report compared to la last presentation with that uh any questions.
Anybody want to start?
Um so uh the new information added the crime tracer does not keep statistics on who search and view the data shared, but the system can be audited for a specific searches, right?
Yes.
Why did we not do a uh audit this past year?
Meaning, um so I have uh I have issue I don't know how or what to audit for.
Uh meaning 'cause it it it's the way crime tracer is ran, it's a search engine for us to run through all the uh uh records and um police report to get to gets fed into it.
So if uh if we have an allegation of misuse, I can um look at that particular user's login or at least search term, right?
Meaning like, oh, he shouldn't have searched John Smith.
Then we can look at all the searches done on John Smith.
Uh in general, it I I don't uh know and I open the idea as how to audit basically everybody's Google searches when it comes internal the police department.
Can you explain a little bit more about this the the system can be audited for a specific search?
What what does that entail?
So if I search for John Smith today, right?
I put John Smith one one the nineteen fifty.
The fact that is searched is locked into that system.
Now let's say uh it comes to light much later that uh, you know, that was my I don't know, uh uh uh neighbor that I'm having to speak with and I should have done that, right?
It comes to light and it gets investigated by my internal affairs.
Uh they can go in the crime tracer goes, hey.
Look up who has searched for this particular person, and then from there they can break down um the searches done and everything.
So it's not a so it's kind of like diving into your search engine searches.
Okay.
So it's like kind of like who used the search term in the past.
Okay.
Thank you.
Other questions on that side of the room?
If there are any questions at the moment.
Um, I have a quick one on on page three of your document and page five of 89 of the full packet, uh, where it says data source from the Oakland police department cannot be accessed by ICE nor um CPB C B staff.
Does that mean not technically act tough?
Not is it a licensing issue?
It's not w what uh what if the prevent prevention of the access?
Well, crime tracer have told us and we uh we have to opt in in terms of these access.
Um date, as it stands now, well, as it stands a few weeks ago, uh a couple weeks ago when I sent that email.
They do not have license to see into crime tracers and OPD have not allowed access for those uh i if they were, we would not have allowed them access to our I see, so it couldn't have like they couldn't end up with a license that we wouldn't have understood that got the granite.
We would have to grant it.
Got it.
Okay.
Got it.
Thanks.
And then just one more thing and I'll pass it this way.
In terms of the um your request OPD's request to not gather race data.
Um, do you wanna speak to that for like this looks like one where it's it's very administratively burdensome and is that anything you want to speak to as we're considering how to move forward?
Yes, um, because it like it's it's a search of um it doesn't crime change doesn't generate any data, it doesn't create anything for us.
What it does is allow us to search data that we have, meaning reports that's written by us or like agencies within the Bay Area.
So it's very burdensome to keep track of these data in terms of research.
And the search terms very broad, right?
I can be searching for Fort Fusion, or I can be searching for a license plate, or I can be searching for, you know, anybody with a purple can of soda.
So like it there, well, there's some data that would have some race ability to retain in terms of like oh I'm searching for Bob, but there are object searches that wouldn't have any and it would be extremely difficult, meaning it would have almost have to be a self reporting thing as each officer conduct a search they have to log in and send it to somewhere and it would be very very difficult for all OBD to conduct that.
Okay.
Thank you so much.
Um Mr.
Katz, any questions, comments?
Yeah, um, you say that uh here I'm I'm just don't understand.
Data is stored in FBI criminal justice uh CJI systems and compliant repository.
Uh do we do we as it were own that repository?
Is it is is it is it ours and access to it is dependent on who we give access to.
My un understanding is that it is stored, um the access itself is uh well they pull data from our RML record management system and they store in these uh repositories and we control the uh the overall access in terms of who have access to.
Okay.
I noticed a uh you say beyond federal uh you list agencies that cannot access it, but FBI can.
What's to prevent FBI for accessing it on behalf of border patrol?
It seems to be there's a tremendous loophole here.
In that the ones who can access it can then pass it on to ones that can't.
No, there's nothing we can do to prevent unauthorized um uh turn that way.
Meaning if someone wants to conduct a search for uh uh if someone wants to go out the way to conduct a search of these uh reports and provide it, um there's nothing we can stop them.
And that includes uh such nice friendly states as Georgia, Nevada, Tennessee.
It looks to me like the guardrails are little pieces of string.
It might also be helpful that a lot of these data, a lot of these police reports would be public records anyway.
Uh a lot of it would be because they're there's currying the sourcing uh police reports, narratives and things like that.
So while yes, um ICE can use FBI to curry it, they can just pull a simple public record for the actual reports themselves.
These are not protected information.
Yeah.
Uh Commissioner Hooper, any questions?
Sergeant, do we collect um and more importantly retain in any of these systems that would end up in our RMS citizenship status?
No, sir.
Okay.
Um any actual name or proxy for like a U or T visa.
No, uh the department does not collect any of that information.
Well, we definitely collect it 'cause we process a lot of UN T V since but we don't maybe put that in the RMS system.
However that's collected or done, I couldn't tell you.
I just know that it doesn't exist well.
It doesn't exist in this system because that's not the uh report management system's call or job.
Okay.
Um sorry, can I have any other questions on regard?
Wow.
Anybody else questions for OPD?
Thank you so much.
Uh is there public comment on this item before we move into our discussion?
Uh let me.
Zoom.
Okay.
But there's no coverage.
Okay.
I'm sorry.
Not for this item.
There are no speaker cards for this point, item, but item three, I've received yes, since.
I'm sorry.
For the item.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Yeah.
And can you tell I'll just page your name for you?
Uh yeah, I'm Jesse Rosemore and uh um it seems like maybe I don't I'm not as familiar with the crime tracer thing, but I'd like to know if that if this uh vendor is from out of state.
Uh we might be having the same issue with this as we are with the flock cameras.
I have an email from Jesse Errigan's office that says uh state sanctuary laws can't be enforced on vendors that are from out of state.
Uh flock is from Georgia.
I don't know where crime tracer is from, but um enforcement of our sanctuary policies and what keeps our immigrant neighborhood safe is what's important, and if we can't enforce our rules uh to to vendors who are out of state, then why are we contracting with them in the first place?
I don't know if that's the case for this one, but it's the case for the flock one.
And so if it applies to both of them, then what are we doing?
Like we're we're dealing with fascism.
ICE is gonna be coming to our communities and we can kidnapping our neighbors, they're gonna send them to foreign gulags.
This makes us very endangered.
This makes our our our immigrant communities feel very unsafe.
It makes them not trust any law enforcement whatsoever.
So what are we doing if that's the case with this and with the flock data things?
Again, I have an email from Jesse Ergine's office saying that we cannot enforce state uh SP 35, the the same state sanctuary law when it comes to out of state vendors.
So what are we doing here?
Um that's my question for you when it comes to this and for Flock.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Is there somebody else who filled out a speaker code on this item?
Yes, please suppose.
Yes, and state your name for the record, please.
Uh James, and thank you so much for having me on a resident of district three.
Um, and I just on this particular matter want to just take a moment to note and highlight that the OPD representative clearly stated that he does not know how to audit the system.
That I think that's incredibly important to note as they're coming here to tell you that everything's so safe and so secure and they have all these checks and balances.
He literally said he doesn't know how to audit the system.
So I don't know how any of those guarantees can be verified or enforced.
Additionally, he lied and said that ICE has not been given access to data.
Calmatters has done reporting on how ICE has been able to access this data.
I don't know how he could even verify it because he doesn't know how to audit the system.
Additionally, I really appreciate uh gentlemen in the orange shirt brought up that with the FBI having access to this data, there is no way to prevent it from getting sent to ICE or CDP or whatever may come down the pipeline.
Thank you.
Thank you for your time.
Anybody else on this item?
Anyone in Zoom?
Oh let's see.
Yes, there are two hands raised in Zoom.
Okay.
And the first person is Rajney.
This is Rajni Mandal from District four.
I just wanted to comment on what Commissioner Katz said about sharing data with ICE or sharing data with federal with uh the SBI.
Um there is a bill in process in the state assembly that would prohibit state or local governments from sharing personally identifiable immigration-related information with federal immigration enforcement like ICE without a judicial warrant or court order.
And it also has uh civil penalties that can be brought up by the attorney general.
So it has some teeth.
Um so it is in process, but it's not something that we can fix here at a local level.
Um the sharing of flock data uh from Oakland happened by other agencies outside of Oakland.
Nobody in OPD shared data with ICE.
Um this is just similar to issues with the HIPAA bill and why it was has teeth and fines uh for people who use data inappropriately.
Uh so I'm really hopeful that AD 1300 um will actually bring some teeth to people who actually use data inappropriately, especially data that's um sent to federal law enforcement like ICE.
Um but again, I don't think that is something that we can fix here.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Well, a couple more um folks have raised their hand.
Now there are four hands raised in Zoom and oh three, one person um lowered their hand.
Um so it's Adams, Adams, Jessica, okay.
Now folks are lowering their hands.
So Jessica um Galen, I'll allow you to talk.
You have one minute to speak.
Yeah, I I'm just coming into this issue a little late.
I've been following the police commission, going to police events, and we're not paying attention to the 40% reduction in crime due to these flop cameras, and I'm wondering what the backup plan is if they are removed.
I'm done speaking.
I'll wait for your answer.
Yes.
Leanne Alameda.
Hello, can you hear me?
Yes, we can hear you.
Um I wasn't is are we commenting on the flock cameras right now on item three or?
This is item three A, the crime tracer forensic logic.
Okay.
I will order my hand then.
Okay.
And the last person is Adams Adams.
I'll allow you to talk.
You can unmute yourself.
Adams.
Adams is not unmuted himself.
I asked I did request that he unmute himself.
Okay.
Here we go.
Okay.
Here I go.
Sorry about that.
Okay, I'm ready now.
Uh I'm Kathy Adams, president of the Oak and African American Chamber of Commerce.
I just want to make a comment that public safety is number one.
Um the concern for our businesses and and members and just our constituents here in this community.
I recognize we want to ensure that this enhancement is used properly.
Equally, we want to ensure that OPD has the tools to fight crime in a way that protects, you know, our people in our community and are able in a real time to track, you know, bad people that are doing the crime.
Thank you.
Thank you.
That's that's it for okay.
All right, for discussion.
Anyone want to start us off?
My I guess you could say general understanding of this particular system is that it all that operates as something of Google for law enforcement, and that many of the documents accessible via this network.
Or generally publicly accessible to some degree.
Is that an accurate general understanding?
That is correct.
Uh it doesn't have things like investigative um, you know, ongoing investigative nails anything.
It's it curries information that would be available in a public record request.
So a lot of the documents on here are public records, it just facilitates us easier searching information.
So if this is a search engine for the department.
And I imagine then it also shares similar information with other agencies with access to the same system.
So there's a cross-sharing of information from Oakland to San Francisco to San Jose to nationwide potentially.
That's correct.
Okay.
And fair to say that other agencies records that are uploaded fall into a similar category.
We're not talking about investigative files necessarily.
That's correct.
Okay.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Sergeant.
Sorry.
Um.
So I'm sure you consider this and I'm sure I know your answer, but we'll get it out here for the public.
What if we opted out of data sharing?
I imagine your concern is there'll be a reciprocal action.
Yes.
Um we I have to look into how, meaning can we selectively opt out or is it one of those things where we're completely opt out?
Uh I don't well, obviously I would have to see our curries and see how much we create things outside.
Uh but I imagine the immediate bay area would be something the department has tremendous against the output.
We would like to see data from the immediate bay area.
Uh and then depending on curry and how I'm not um sorry if I confuse you, not worried about what you can see.
If we opted out firewalled everyone, meaning they would have to manually request that submit a warrant, you know, whatever.
I assume I would think department would be worried other people will cut us off as well.
I assume it would be reciprocal data sharing.
Um there's a little ambiguity in here.
Pi kind of picking up along the lines of where uh vice chair was saying under both C on page three and A on page two.
When we're talking about the types of data, if they include the following, to me that doesn't mean it's exhaustive.
Is this an exhaustive list of these bullet points meaning arrest records, field context, uh license plate, personal interest location, etc.
etc.?
Is there anything not listed here that that we are making available?
And just so the public understands why I'm asking this, I do agree with the sergeant on this particular narrow point, if accurate, that each of these data types is already available to anyone in the public state law requires that these things be provided, and I don't think any of us really care about incident numbers or penal codes or you know that doesn't have a privacy impact.
But you can submit a record request for every single one of these things.
I have to confirm.
Uh as I sit here and look at it, I can't think of anything else.
I don't want to give you a black and white answer without double checking.
Uh, but as it stands here, I don't think you're sharing there's additional information that's being shared other than what's written here.
Probably won't take too much hassle to figure that out.
Because I think that would be important.
Um we obviously have to solve uh an ongoing in my opinion, forever problem of third party proxy searches.
That is a known concern that we're gonna have to deal with uh repeatedly.
This technology is a little bit different in that it's a layer over the top of other technologies, and if this is all that's being made available, it's hard to argue against allowing it when these are already public records.
Um but without knowing exactly all the data types that are there, um it might be prudent then to just wait and figure that out and see if we can get some more comfort.
Um also just I don't know, figure out the the opt-out question.
Um, you know, it's unfortunate.
Obviously, that's a stupid word choice.
Um it is a terrible sign of the times that we're in the traditional lines between these federal agencies have been blurred, um especially with the FBI being greatly repurposed towards immigration enforcement, and now the JTTF uh being completely repurposed to attack um anybody that disagrees with Trump.
Um you know, this is going to mean very difficult choices about data sharing.
We still have to solve, obviously, homicides and violent crimes and things, um, legitimate stuff.
So, getting the answers to those questions, um, I think would be in everybody's self-interest.
Cool.
Sergeant, do you have immediate feelings about that about a delay to allow you to answer those two things?
No, absolutely not.
I'd be happy to answer it on these questions for you.
Uh the first question is probably easier, uh, but the second one we'll have to reach out a crime tracer, right?
Okay, okay.
So, is everybody comfortable with that?
I think that makes sense, and it would be good information.
That's right.
Okay.
Thank you so much.
All right.
Um the next item on our agenda is the use policy for the community safety camera systems.
Uh we're gonna delay this so that he can get more information.
Um before we get to this item, I'm just gonna kind of make a general point.
I um there obviously is a lot of emotion and a lot of very valid and real and huge concerns about this.
I feel like we have the opportunity to show that we can be respectful and we can be kind to each other.
I'm really gonna ask that we do that in this forum.
Um this is our community.
We may disagree, but we need to treat other people well.
So that's very important to me here.
Um, okay.
Do we have a OPD representative?
Good evening.
Good evening.
Uh so Lieutenant Gabriel Archiza uh from uh the real time operations center.
I'm the commander of that unit uh at local police department.
Uh we've obviously visited this issue several times over the last I think four months at this point.
Um so I wasn't gonna go super in the depth about the policy itself, but maybe go into some of the confusion about what the policy actually covers.
Um, related to um the devices themselves, so the majority of the actual uh devices would be uh community partnership cameras or privately owned cameras um that are uh making an affirmative decision to opt in to share inside or share with OPD uh utilizing the Flock operating system.
Um but that data that those cameras are capturing will still be retained uh by their owners or whoever's managing those camera systems and aren't retained by Flock.
So Flock is basically uh our interface to be able to access that camera data, but not retain that camera data.
Uh the only exception would be in cases where that um that video would be evidence or that video data would be evidence, or we're then downloading that data related to a specific crime uh and then retaining it uh for a criminal investigation for as long as that takes.
Uh the other part portion of that are camera systems that are managed by the department itself.
That's a minority of the cameras in the system.
Uh would be about 40 cameras is what we're estimating at.
That data would be retained through the flock operating system.
That data would be accessed by OPD, and those camera systems would be in public places and viewing public places.
And the purpose of those camera systems in the first place was to augment the camera system that already exists in areas that may not have uh business improvement districts or business groups that can afford some of these larger camera systems.
So it's more to augment in those in those communities that can't necessarily afford systems of their own.
That's the big differences between the two camera systems.
Um and then one thing we wanted to emphasize is that any of the cameras that are integrated into the Flock operating system are only accessed by OPD.
So there isn't it's not like Flock ALPR where there's other agencies that can query for information.
This information is strictly related to OPD access by OPD, and then we'll only be retained past 30-day limit if it's relevant related to an investigation.
One thing about the policy that we changed since the last time that we've discussed it, uh, was originally the retention period was 90 days.
Uh, we dropped that to 30 days uh after the last meeting, uh and that was reflective of think the feedback within this room uh from uh the pack uh and then looking kind of at the trend of what the state is looking at as far as retention related to AOPR.
Um so we have shortened that to 30 days, uh, and that's reflected in the policy that was sent over with this last uh agenda.
Um one of the big topics from the last uh time that we met was related to the contract itself.
Um I know that there was kind of a default uh contract that was provided.
Uh we reached out to Flock and asked them to make a contract that was uh tailored to OPD and the needs of the city uh with um certain things that we didn't have in there before.
Um of the uh things that was changed since then was the uh topic of anonymized data that was then aggregated and then used by machine learning.
Uh that was part of the default contract.
Uh we asked to be removed from that, and Flock has agreed to remove us.
So there won't be anonymized data retained uh past any retention period.
Uh the other section, um, well, part of this process is when uh the initial contract that we were talking about last time was related to a certain type of contract.
We discovered that if we wanted to have um different stipulations that we needed to take a different route or have a different vehicle or a different contract vehicle, which was actually our through the city is a IT PSA, which is a different type of service agreement.
So we transferred a lot of the information that we uh gained from last meeting and from our meeting with Flock, and then put that into the uh IT PSA.
Uh part of that is that there's um more bolstered language related to protecting city data, uh, which is contained on page six and seven.
Uh there was clarity and language uh related to the data that the Flock would provide uh pursuant to a legal order.
Uh, then OPD requested added language uh related to terminating contracts uh based on a breach or uh uh using something that was outside of the contract.
Uh, included a clause that uh would suspend service in the event of a federal assumption that would be if the city or the department uh is assumed by the federal government in a way that would prevent us from executing our own agency in relation to data.
Uh and then I'm missing one other thing.
Um there's a morality clause that allow either the department or flock to uh break the contract from each other uh for a variety of reasons.
Uh and then there's also uh if Flock enters into a contract with the federal agency uh which would then allow them to access our data anyway, we would be uh allowed to break that contract.
Uh so that was kind of the main topics of of that IT uh PSA.
I know it's like 40 plus pages long, so it's a lot to get through.
Uh, but we really wanted to address a lot of the things that had come up in the last meeting, some of the concerns.
Uh, we have sent that contract forward to Flock uh for their response.
For the most part, a lot of the the items I think they were already um in theory agreeing to.
Uh there's going to be obviously lots of discussion over the next few months related to that contract.
Um, one thing I just did want to address from uh the last meeting and the last few meetings, is there was a lot of question about is this uh not just this technology but all of technology worth it?
And there was a lot of discussion about um saying that the products don't work or that this technology isn't beneficial.
Um I think a lot of that is only is not taken in perspective of some of the other groups within this community who are a lot are affected uh more greatly by the kind of crime that we're trying to address by taking this cohesive approach related to leveraging technology.
Uh one thing that kind of brought that to bear um from the last meeting is we had the meeting on Thursday.
Uh Friday night we then had uh a shooting in Uptown where we had five separate shootings where six people were shot and two of them unfortunately lost their lives.
It took hours to get video uh surveillance video from the businesses.
It was in the early morning hours of Saturday.
I think it was like three or four in the morning.
Some of the video took hours, other video took days.
Um and in this day and age in 2025, the inability to even access that, um, god forbid if we had an uh active shooting situation, the department has zero access to these camera systems to address that kind of threat.
Um these five shootings took place basically in like a 20 minute period, and there was uh ability if we had been able to access these cameras to potentially interrupt or interfere uh with one of these shootings before it occurred.
Um, and I know it's to be something that someone will say, Oh, this is fear mongering.
But if you look at it, we've had 95 shootings in uptown since 2023, and 15 of those have been fatal.
So these this is a real issue affecting our community, not just an uptown, but it's something that's happening all over the city.
Um we're talking about efficacy of the program, and it's it's not just block ALPR or the community safety camera systems, it's this entire theory of using a cohesive approach and leveraging technology.
We have seen we have a 41% drop in robberies from this or from last year, this year, year date.
That's a significant drop that I haven't seen since I've worked here.
Um, if you talk about homicides, I think we're down 30% this year.
But if you look at it, we've had 51 homicides this year.
If in 2023 year to date, we had 92.
So we're talking about 41 lives, not forty-one broken windows, not forty-one stolen cars, 41 lives.
These systems are very effective, and there are responsible ways to utilize technology and acknowledge the fear from the community and things the ways that this system could be misused.
But I just would ask everyone to consider this.
It's not just, you know, something that we're saying is working and there's it's not demonstrated.
Well, if we look at San Francisco, we look at us, we've seen uh this being used uh efficiently and effectively.
With that, I'll answer any questions.
Thank you so much.
Over here, any questions at the moment?
All right.
Commissioner Tomlinson.
Uh um can you talk a little bit about the subscription process around the private and public entities who want to sign up for prescribe their camera system into this process?
So I believe there's different processes between uh some of these like big cameras, they have their own, they've already integrated their cameras into kind of a uh VMS cohesive system.
Um that would probably have a more substantial price than say the 7-Eleven.
Um, so it's just based on I guess this the amount of feeds that are fed in, um, and there's it's between uh Flock and those actual businesses to uh make those contracts for them to agree to share in, um, but for these for the bids or the businesses that already have uh uh like uh cohesive VMS system, they are working together with Flock to integrate those cameras.
So it just it just depends on on the process.
So is there is there a vetting or a uh a vetting of the private or public entity that wants to participate in this initiative?
Is there some sort of review or requirements or qualifications or because anyone who has a public or private camera?
What's the criteria?
Um so one of the things that's part of uh the policy or part of this process has been uh putting together this consent form that uh has I think seven questions at this point um related to them saying them recognizing that Oakland is a sanctuary city and basically what our stance is as related to immigration enforcement um there's another uh question on there that basically says are you agreeing that you're not gonna use facial recognition technology as part of uh this camera system and what one thing I just want to be clear about is them opting in to share with us is a one way street so they're sharing with us.
They don't have access to any of the other cameras in the system.
Only OPD would have access to the those cameras.
Do do we have that opt-in form or opt-in questionnaire?
It's in here we do audio?
Did I miss it?
Okay.
This is the vendor questionnaire.
That's not what you're looking for.
The for to for um a public or private entity to sign on for this initiative.
What's the criteria?
What is there a form?
Is it something that's after um is there a betting at the end of exhibit nine just like it's like this.
Okay.
Okay.
And and then what's the process once that private entity fills up completes this form.
Again, tell me about the process.
So we'd review it if it basically would uh require them to answer all the questions in the affirmative to participate.
Uh once we have that form um they would be approved to be entered into the system.
But then there is a certain point where they have to work that out with with Flock, like the company itself would and the and and now a technical question.
The transport of the data uh of the the surveillance data from these private entities that have their own technologies, have their own IT departments, have their own security processes in place.
Uh is there some sort of uh handshake or agreement uh between OPD and that public or private entity how do we know that their various security processes and policies are able to uh manage the transmit of the data from private entity to the OPD.
Uh so we probably wouldn't be able to manage that process um but for the most part most of these systems are already integrated in some kind of cloud-based storage um so and then flock would have their own way of trans so if if it didn't already have a a cloud based system that they're storing then Flock would be giving them software so it'd be their whatever s uh safety protocols they have.
Does that make sense?
Um and I guess what uh more to say is even if we weren't integrating them into our system they would still have the same vulnerabilities so they would still in theory uh someone could access their system.
Yeah and I guess that's kind of my that's my point underlying um because there'll be disparate systems disparate camera based systems uh so disparate points of possible breach so that's my that's my point.
Okay.
But that helps me understand the framework a little bit better.
Thanks.
Um thank you.
It's actually a question for someone from the city attorney's office if there's are you here?
Thank you.
Um if you have any of these documents in front of you I was looking at page eight of the on the uh services agreement the section under section forty that talks about distribution and sharing of city data um I am curious about speaking generally here about how this may have played out in the past with respect to the city receiving service of subpoenas for city data and how the city's responded in the past, because if this data is collected, the city then becomes a target for subpoenas.
It doesn't mean the data's turned over as a matter of course.
There's a process we can move to Quash, et cetera.
But I'm kinda curious if has this played out before how we responded.
Is that feasible for us to do do?
Do we have the budget for it, that sort of thing.
Hi, it's uh Ahmadisatello with the city attorney's office.
It depends.
Um right, just because uh there's a subpoena that's you know, the city has received doesn't necessarily mean the city will comply with it or won't won't necessarily um mean that it won't challenge it.
So it it just depends.
Um I think you mentioned in regards to the the data breach a couple years ago.
I don't know.
I don't have specifics on that one in terms of if that came up.
Um, but it really just depends on on the nature of what the subpoena says and what the authority is and you know what's the underlying dispute.
I suppose the hypothetical that comes to mind, and I you know, bear with me here.
If we implement a system like this, and let's say CBP decides that they want to target, I don't know, a camera in the fruit bail system, which I don't think is in this proposal, but let's just say there's one at a time.
If CBP sends us a subpoena saying we want access to your footage for this month, any footage has been saved, and then Flock, pursuant to this PSA gives us a 24-hour notice saying, hey, we just got served processed from CBP FYI.
Can we as a city feasibly respond to that in a timely fashion?
I think we could.
I think um, you know, again, it just depends on on the situation, but it's I'm aware of situations where we have responded quickly to different you know, court orders that are asking for things, and maybe there was not agreement or thinking that you know there's an that we that we had to respond or that they're entitled to respond, or that we're they're entitled to the information they want.
So it conceivably yes.
Um and there are other situations uh that the city's dealing with um there's currently some litigation that the city's with.
Um has joined several other jurisdictions in regards to federal grant terms, and so um where the federal government is trying to impose new grant terms um based on the current federal administration that the city um thinks are unlawful or or that we can't agree to, and so in those situations um there's current litigation where you know we do respond as quickly as possible where we think that uh we can't comply with those grant terms or there's there's problems with them.
Okay.
Thank you.
Appreciate it.
Thank you.
Can I expand on that just a little bit?
Alright, how about uh sure?
Far from me to educate you on uh search and seizure law.
Um in the the example that you provided when we're talking about something like that to when you're writing a search warrant, you're looking for evidence of a particular crime that occurred in a particular time, um, even in search warrants for more conventional things, a 30-day search of something that's showing, you know, numerous people walking through an area would probably get shot down.
Um, so I the harder thing to overcome would be if they're asking for a specific time in a specific place for a specific person, but that would then indicate that they have all that information.
So they're not blinging too much information about that person, but maybe about a particular crime.
So I do I s we shared the concern and it was something that I've asked is has anyone written something that's gotten live access to any of these cameras and it just hasn't been done?
Because we'd be talking basically about a federal T3 wiretab, and even for other like things like Instagram, the response on those are basically delayed packets every 30 minutes.
It's not like you're convinced a live stream video.
So that was something that we were concerned about and we we've asked about, and it's just doesn't seem like it's it's occurred.
I would definitely tend to agree that if you're talking about a 30-day period, the first counter-argument is going to be that the warrant is over broad, so the document shouldn't be produced pursuant to a subpoena because the subpoena is invalid.
That said, I think we're dealing in an environment now where this particular DOJ and this particular federal judiciary might be more accommodating to what previously could be considered overbroad or insufficiently specific applications.
So while I agree that generally speaking that should be what's happening, I can see a future where it doesn't.
So it's nice to know that both and is happening.
Both that we have the overbroad argument and that we can respond if they get as far as actually sending the documentation.
Yes, and I think in in almost all cases, even if they did a delay notification, we would eventually find out.
So I think there is we do still have some power over that.
We might not be able to stop every single incident, but if this is something that they're going to start trying, it's something that we could stop and mitigate.
But that brings up something interesting.
We would retain the power to no longer collect proactively, but we would be excuse me.
We would potentially be subject to preservation orders, though.
So anything we've collected could be preserved pending litigation, right?
Yes, but in theory, these would be automatically purging after 30 days anyway, and that would only be for our devices.
Right.
Which were would be in even more public areas than I think we're talking about with the private cameras, and then they still have they would have the exact same vulnerabilities, maybe even more so, with less of ability to fight it.
Okay.
Is there any thought as to the department or the city stepping in to defend against requests for data from the private partners on this side?
It's a little bit less clear because you know, say there's a particular camera system that's subpoenaed by DOJ.
Is the city interested at all in stepping in to say we think this subpoena is improper because they're a partner in our camera system, so we're gonna step in and put them under our wing, or is that beyond the scope here?
I I think they'd have to answer that question.
I would sure hope so.
Um, and yeah, I think we've we've had this conversation at length with both Flock and with with the city attorney's office, and we would hope that that would be the case.
Okay.
Okay.
Thank you.
Are there questions for PD?
Commissioner Wayne?
Um, so have we only been talking to Flock so far about this camera project?
Uh I've looked at other vendors that have comparable capabilities, which is extremely limited.
So there are there are vendors with a comparable cubability.
Which would have kind of the similar issues that we're talking about with Flock.
Okay.
Okay.
One of the issues we haven't talked about, we haven't heard you talk about is something I brought up last time.
We have a sanctuary city contracting and investment ordinance.
What do we do about it?
So as part of the the contract that we're proposing, there it would have the um, I believe it's schedule I, but it would have that sanctuary city ordinance or sanctuary city um blanking somebody coming on this one, but it has the language that would require them to follow our laws in that contract.
If they did enter the contract with any, I think with ICE, they would have to notify us.
So that would hopefully alleviate.
Don't we have a current existing contract with Flock uh regarding ARRP uh the automatic license place waiter?
So this is a rather unique situation.
So CHP is the one that had the contract, we are an agent of that contract.
No, no, no.
Do City of Oakland currently have a contract.
Yes, that's what we're trying to do here.
And when we sign the contract with FOG, we already have the centricity contracting and investment ordinance in place, right?
That's what I'm saying.
We don't have a contract with Flock.
Okay.
I Dr.
Beckman.
OPD.
Uh we have a series of MOUs that came before this commission and went to council.
So one MOU was between us and CHP, and the other MOU was between us and Flock.
The actual contract was between CHP and Flock.
As a as uh an agreement in that MOU, it made OPD an agent as it related to the ALPR cameras, the 290 cameras.
So we have an MOU with Flock for the license plate or license reader for last yes, that's what we signed last year.
Okay.
As part of the sanctuary city contracting and investment ordinance, we're supposed we are required to provide a notice to the vendor that we have a centricity ordinance law.
So I will defer that question to legal.
I can just explain that those are the two contractual mechanisms that we had in place.
Okay, yeah.
So maybe this is a question for OPT because you guys have inner you got sort of one interfacing Flock for that uh flock for the license plate uh reader project, right?
The city attorney might be able to help shed some light on that.
Yeah, sure, that'll be great.
So, commissioners, uh through the chair, that's a good question.
So we looked into this question and uh as as has been described, that was the MOU that the city entered into with Flock and with Alto CHP.
And when you look at the Sanctuary City contract ordinance, um it is set up to capture contracts and apply to contracts that go through the city's purchasing ordinance.
So that's um chapter 2.04 of the Oakland Municipal Code.
That's the ordinance that sets out the process for all types of city contracts, whether or not it's for public works project, an IT project, buying goods or services, and so the ordinance applies to that process when you use that process, what which is the normal process where the city um seeks out vendors doing an RFP or bidding process.
Um that's why if you look at the contracting ordinance, the the immigration um sanctuary city contracting ordinance, the like if you look at the waiver section, it talks about um city administrator has authority to waive within their contracting authority, and then um, then if there's gonna be a waiver requested, if there's a vendor that might um have those contracts, city council waives it to a certain level within their purchasing authority.
So looking at that framework, um the agreement with CHP and with Flock, it does provide for obviously um, you know, an agreement to do things, but it's not the type of agreement that the that that ordinance applies to, that the um sanctuary city and contracting ordinance applies to.
And that's why um since that process is different, there was no schedule included, it's not like a normal uh process that we'd use uh as it, you know, in contrast to the one that we're that OPD is seeking now to get a new contract, that contract is going through the purchasing ordinance process and will be uh an iT professional services agreement, and we'll have that schedule and be and be subject to those requirements.
So we did not provide a notice to Flock when we enter into that MOU, we did not provide a copy of the notice that we have a sanctuary city ordinance.
That's my understanding.
There was no notice provided, and just to clarify, that agreement was not subject to this rule of the uh sanctuary city and contracting ordinance.
So notice no notice was provided, and that agreement was not subject to the rule.
So I'm assume there was also no stipulation or certification by Flock uh in connection with the license plate reader that they will comply with the central city ordinance.
I haven't heard any anything about that type of stipulation.
And again, just to clarify the rule we're talking about the sanctuary city contracting ordinance, it applies to certain vendors that do certain types of contracts with ICE, and that agreement, the one that uh that I I guess is expiring is not subject to that rule to go through that process.
We so the one it's uh the license plate reader that's about to expire.
You're saying one we renew, it wouldn't be subject to the centricity ordinance either.
Well, it's not gonna be renewed.
My understanding is OPD wants a new agreement um to get continued access to the AOPR, then these certain amount of uh 40 cameras, and then get access to the private cameras.
That agreement um that requirement will apply to it, the sanctuary city contracting ordinance because that agreement is being done through the process that I was mentioning, the the um purchasing ordinance process, where we have you know solicitation RFP, all the city's contracting schedules apply to that including the the contracting requirement for for what we're talking about the Sanctuary City contracting ordinance thank you.
Thank you very much any other questions for OPD or the city attorney before you Commissioner Katz.
Okay one one is uh probably trivial uh is this for OPD can we let yeah for if for for OPD uh as as I understand it uh if the system is in place and let's say the ABC Oyo company has got a camera you get to that camera through Flock.
That is the you don't go that is it the way this thing is being set up it's Flock that's doing the interchange and connection to other people and you will go through Flock, is that correct?
So the the if that particular business wanted to opt in to share with us they would fill out our consent form so follow our protocol and then that would allow them once they make whatever agreement they have with Flock to then share into the system that we can then access.
Okay so it does go so so your your job is fairly simple you connect to Flock and Flock is done the connections needed to get to the yo yo company or anybody else for you.
Yes in theory the company could go and make that contract with Flock absent our participation but it's obviously this is part of our a system what I put and the other is a is a stupid legal question.
Uh what happens if a warrant comes in to Flock and it's got one of those addendums that says there's a secret you can't tell anybody where with subpoena it what happens then or is this not possible?
From my understanding this is never happened um not to say it could never happen but it's never happened but from any search warrant that I've seen there's a delay of notification there's not a delay of ever notifying so we would find out at some point.
Thank you.
Oh sorry sorry I should have uh small I have a question for the city attorney office if that's right.
So for the current MOU with Flock regarding to a license place reader we are paying for that right?
Because like a not no cost situation.
Uh are you do you mean the one that the city already entered into?
Yeah the one we have with Flock right now.
So that one my understanding is the state of California paid for it so they paid Flock to provide these services to the city.
But are we providing as part of the agreement are we providing data?
Are we agreeing to provide data?
So I feel like so sorry so yes the CHP of this uh state of California paid for the actual system uh and the cameras get installed the data still belongs to departments of the city okay for our cameras which is the two hundred and ninety two cameras is uh is the city paying for any part of that service as far as I know no that's why we're trying to get this contract through so that we can then start paying them for the service okay when does they expire when does the current line expire I'm not sure about that MOU but CHP CHP still has a contract with Flock and then our MOU with CHPs for three years.
I think one of the things that you're talking about is we we have that in the new contract which would have the schedule I which is about the sanctuary city ordinance which they would then have to agree to so it will be part of this process that's what we've been trying to get this through for the last four months and hopefully we can get it through and then we'll have that and then if they do enter into any contract or agreement with ICE we're uh notified.
Otherwise it's a breach contract and we can terminate anybody down there?
Commissioner Everhardt question comments?
Question Hero said.
Commissioner Hooper?
No?
Okay.
I think we will move to public comment.
We may have more for you after that.
Thank you.
Uh Alice, can you I guess should we just say if you if you've signed up to speak on this item, you can feel free to um come and stand at the podium or chair.
We have 21 speaker cards on this item and numerous folks wait raising their hand in Zoom.
Okay.
Um sorry, go ahead.
About nine people embracing nine people.
Okay, so it's a minute each.
Um feel free to go in any order and feel free to start.
Just please identify yourself when you come up.
And um we have a request from K Tot to for everyone to please speak into the mic.
Um, and um, just one moment.
We're gonna share the clock on the screen so you can see how much time you have left.
Or how much time you have, period, which is one minute as a chair stated.
And K Top, if you could share my screen.
Can I begin now?
Um just can you tell me your name?
Uh James from District 3.
James.
Okay.
Um there's a number of points I want to make and I'll try to be concise.
One of them is that I think using the terminology of license plate reader for Flock is profoundly inaccurate.
It's an AI enabled roadway surveillance system.
It doesn't just capture license plates, it does a vehicle footprint.
Recently, Flock also opened their system to this thing called Nova.
Nova uses data broker sets that are online.
They also planned to use hacked dark web data.
So it would link the vehicle to all this personal identification.
Commissioner in the blue suit, you asked about visa status.
This would show who you live with, what home you're in, where you're employed.
All of these things are linked to this data set called Nova that Flock operates.
Additionally, there was some misinformation provided by the sergeant.
He said there's a 30-day retention window.
CHP has a 60-day retention window.
Additionally, the contract that Flock has to enforce these systems includes a backdoor to the FBI.
The entire system is accessible to the FBI at all times.
He said that you uh you had provided a hypothetical about CDP.
The the the OPD officer got nine minutes.
That you had said this hypothetical about the circumstance of CBP.
Thank you so much.
Additionally, he said data isn't retained.
He said data isn't retained.
Their consent form says we can access historical data.
Thank you so much for your comments.
Thank you.
Thank you very much for your comments.
Hi, my name is Ollie.
Um I'm here because I'm also concerned about plot cameras being used in Oakland.
Um privacy, as you know, on this board of people, uh, keeps us safe from discrimination, especially in a system where a lot of our partial system is based in individual discretion.
So the discretion of judges, police officers, and other individuals in power are what decide what gets escalated in our judicial system.
Um AI is also flawed and biased.
Um for many of us our vehicles are extensions of our bodies.
We are being surveilled in movement when we're being surveilled in our vehicles.
Uh Oakland is a sanctuary city is a sanctuary city and has the opportunity to prevent the uptick and criminalization of immigrants, people pursuing gender affirming and reproductive care, and anyone the current administration deems dangerous.
We set a precedent in Oakland by maintaining privacy in a moment where we have mind data and our rights are called into question by federal level fascism.
Sorry.
I am especially concerned about who we think we're keeping safe.
Is it the people who are in a trailer?
Is it my friends in a trailer?
Hi, commissioners.
My name is Michael Solorio, and I am a mental health clinician at nearby public schools.
I work especially with Latvina communities.
So I see over and over the debilitating stress of the danger of ICE.
One of the boys I work with how to be admitted to an institution because he almost killed himself.
He's just a teenager, but he's so stressed about his family's safety that his mental health has pumlinated.
If Oakland approves this and expands Flock and increases even the possibility of ICE presence, then my client and many others are gonna be pushed even closer to the brink, and some unfortunately falling over the edge.
That's why I'm here asking you to please protect my community's mental health and our communities' lives by protecting our privacy and by blocking Flock.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Michael Solorio.
Thank you.
Hi, my name is Narayan, and I'm a high school senior who's been born and raised in Oakland my whole life.
We're all here because we want Oakland to be safe.
It's a goal that we all share, but a plan to install a massive network of surveillance cameras won't deliver us that safety we deserve.
All it does is sell us a false promise.
The truth about what will happen is that these cameras won't stop crime as it happens.
They'll just record it.
They create a massive database of our daily lives, tracking where we go, who we talk to, and what we do, all without our consent.
This doesn't make us safer, it just makes us watched.
And what we have to ask is who controls this power.
History shows us that this kind of surveillance is never evenly applied to everyone.
It will disproportionately target and harm our black and brown communities feeling over policing and distrust.
So basically, we're being asked to trade our privacy and our freedom for the illusion of security.
We can't let that happen.
Resources spent on expensive security systems are resources not spent on other proven proactive measures.
Say no to the cameras.
We should protect our community and not just watch it.
Thank you.
Hi, my name is Jesse Rose Mormon in district one.
Um I looked through the agenda packet and I didn't see anything anywhere about how uh OPD would enforce the city's policy when it comes to sanctuary laws and making sure there isn't any collusion with ICE.
All this data is going straight to ICE.
Um I've been raising this issue with uh several city council offices.
Um all of them are downplaying this issue, saying that it's not happening because they'd rather keep their head in the sand than deal full on with the fact that all these ALPR cameras, like they this data can go to another law enforcement agency who can lie about why they want to use it and then give that information to ICE.
This is happening over and over and over.
None of the city council offices want to deal with it.
I've been I've they they deny that it's happening.
The mayor's office is completely silent about it, and I really commend all of you for bringing this at for bringing this to their attention and making sure that they cannot ignore the fact that the data collected by these cameras and what will be collected if you if they expand the system will go to ICE.
And I I'd like to thank you as well for uh confirming that when OPD tries to extend this ALPR contract, um, that it'll be in violation of the state sanctuary law because um flock is is colluding.
Thank you.
Sorry about that.
How y'all doing this evening?
My name is uh Chani Turner.
I am the um voter engagement director with uh Oakland Rising, also a uh district seven resident.
Um I'm here to uh urge you to decline flock cameras.
Uh Oakland is a sanctuary city, get this proposal undermines that commitment.
Consolidating OPD's public surveillance cameras with private cameras and automated license pipe readers it's a flux.
It's a flux massive real-time tracking network of Oaklanders' daily lives.
This is just not about privacy, it's about safety, sanctuary, and power.
In District 7 where I live, there's already an increase of CHP.
Who doesn't have to be held accountable to Oakland's policies?
Every camera that feeds into this system expands to drag net.
Once the data exists, it can be assessed by federal agencies.
We know that ICE, regardless of local promises, um already has shared uh data with ICE and other agencies in the past.
That means that our undocumented neighbors, black and brown residents, working class communities are at risk.
While these groups and individuals, okay.
Well, I urge you to vote no, reject the cameras, and invest into um actual human healing.
Thank you.
Hello, uh, goodbye, Alex, and I'm a district one uh resident.
Um I wanna just say one thing, um, which is you know, apart from all of the statistics, all this data that's been offered, we can talk about how ALPR data doesn't actually help stop crime programs like ceasefire do.
Um, but I really wanna just emphasize that in this moment we have an opportunity to actually restrict the ability for the federal government to do what it wants to do.
Trump wants to invade Oakland.
Trump wants to take over and take away power from local municipalities and put them under federal jurisdiction.
They are doing this through a variety of different database methods, and one of the predominant tools that they are using to target immigrants to target political dissidents, to target anyone who disagrees with Trump is ALPR data because they can get real time tracking information for not just me, not just our undocumented neighbors, but all of you as well.
If you ever want to resist fascism, if you have any desire to resist fascism, you can start by making a substantial difference right now, inviting no on this proposal.
Thank you.
Thank you.
And for the speakers, the there's a clock um that's being shared, so you can kind of monitor your time.
Well, it was being shared.
Um, my name is Remy Duse.
I'm a resident of district three and assistance systems engineer.
I'm here to urge the commission to not only reject the proposed expansion of flock safety license plate readers, but to fully remove all existing flock systems from Oakland's public safety infrastructure.
Flock captures each passing vehicle and discriminately linking information across hundreds of devices.
This massive amount of data is stored for six 30 days or more by third party cloud providers and is put further at risk by contractual backdoor agreements.
This July, Flock publicly exposed sensitive source code and a live API admin key.
Meaning anyone online could access things like the entire flock map and data that could be used to reconstruct personally identifying information.
These cameras make me less safe.
More importantly, Oakland risk bundling data to ICE.
SF standard reported this year that San Francisco and Oakland police legally provided data to federal agencies, including at least one documented case of OPD giving data to ICE.
Oakland should stand by its values as a sanctuary serious city and little leader in civil rights by ending all agreements with block safety.
And thank you.
Thank you.
Hello, Council Giovanni from District 4.
So the issues before us are not simply about efficiency or technology, it's about power, accountability, and trust.
Moreover, it's failing failing the collect demographic data while running AI surveillance is not a neutral choice.
It's a form of race blindness that hides the harm, and if you do not track how these systems are inherently um interactive with racial groups and ethnic groups differently, you're guaranteeing that disparities are remaining invisible, and particularly with uh council members accidentally pointed out about the loophole with the FBI having access and other federal agencies that moreover leads to more um over spill.
So and then also we're the police of chiefs told us to worry about the officers spending time logging time logging data for who they stop and search, but the technology itself is supposed to save time.
Why is the burden being shifted onto our civil liberties instead?
And why is the efficiency of paperwork being valued highly more than the dignity and privacy of the people being watched?
Why is the data being unaccountable by a third party that's not viewed by citizens of Oakland?
And with that, thank you.
NFON.
Thank you.
Good afternoon.
My name is Michael Wimsat.
I'm an acting chief of staff for Council Member Wong, who represents District Two of Oakland, and is the chair of the public safety.
One of the businesses in Council Number One's district, Kim Tim Jewelry, was brutally vulnerabilized.
A truck was crashed in, eight men in masks, shoved the owner to the ground, ultimate gunpoint, and took his life savings.
This is one of many stories of businesses immigrant-owned in Little Saigon and Chinatown that are part of District 2 in San Antonio and some of our working class neighborhoods that are feeling this crime rate.
Access to real-time sharing via these cameras is crucial for OPD to be able to respond quickly and efficiently with its understaffing crisis.
I urge you to consider folks like the Dow family, the owners of Kim 10 and the other victims of crime that could be supported by these cameras.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Uh good evening, Chair and Committee members.
My name is Stephanie.
I represent the Oakland Chinatown Chamber of Commerce.
We work in partnership with Oakland's Bid Alliance to uplift and protect our commercial corridors.
The Chinatown Chamber has a surveillance network of over 50 cameras, and we have long hauled for increased public safety.
Cameras are not just a tool, they are a safeguard that help to deter crime and provide accountability.
The OPD camera use policy provides oversight needed to ensure that tools are used responsibly.
We need clear procedures and they must be in place to guide how these cameras are used, ensure transparency and balance safety with privacy protections.
Without this policy, we delay solutions that could prevent crime and protect our most vulnerable.
So we strongly urge you to approve the OPD use policy and bring it forward to the council.
This is an opportunity to show that Oakland takes safety seriously and is committed to balancing public safety with privacy protections.
Again, safety is the foundation of a thriving economy.
Support our small business and immigrant owned businesses.
I am monitoring the time for every speaker.
K Top Keith, please share my clock on the screen for the members of the public in the room and on Zoom.
Thank you.
Thanks, everybody.
My name is Elaine Dimasy.
I live in Grand Lake, and I'm a physicist by trading, so I do have a deep understanding of what it means to have a machine-assisted, very large, very valuable database.
And one thing we know of these corporations is that they will not be able to resist the lure of those dollar signs.
The data that will be um fingerprinted at capturing the uh characteristics of my car, and combined with other databases, it will be too valuable to resist selling outside the control of the city of Oakland.
So I'm here to urge you to vote no but to find a local solution that does not involve these outer entities because it's not just ice, as others have said, it's the bodily autonomy of women, it's the safety of LGBTQ communities, and it's the dissidents.
And as was said here, in times like these, we can't assume best intent.
And from what I've heard of all the pro and con um presentations here, there's not enough guardrails.
There's not enough of an off-switch, and there's not enough coverage of the back doors.
Thank you very much.
Thank you.
Hi, my name is Marga Fernandez.
I'm a small business owner and mom of two teens in Oakland public schools, and I'm against and I'm against it.
Okay.
I have four points.
Facial recognition to technology is proven to increase racial disparity and rests.
More black people get arrested and less white people get arrested.
That's not correlated to crimes.
Two, data privacy is a right that's being eroded, and misuse has to be considered.
I don't see that misuse has been properly considered or advocated against for this.
Three, it doesn't help prevent crime.
All of these crimes already happened with the cameras around.
The one that was just mentioned happened with the cameras around.
It's after the fact.
For to whose benefit is the expansion of Flock's surveillance cameras right now.
Flock.
I'm done.
Thank you.
Hello, my name is Manny.
I'm the chair of the Latino Affairs Commission for the County of Santa Cruz.
I represent the interests of the Latino and immigrant communities in Santa Cruz.
I'm here because my duties to my constituents require that I stand before you and tell you that if you recommend the city contract with Flock, the city will be in violation of their sanctuary policy.
Not only will your decisions here affect your constituents, but it will also affect mine, because we share data with each other.
Information I know through a record request.
So if your data gets screwed, our data gets screwed.
If our data gets screwed, your data gets screwed.
Flock and other data brokers are part of the ICE and HSI surveillance apparatus and have already participated in a private pilot program with the uh DHS.
Plus it can be accessed by uh FBI and then shared with ICE.
These cameras are a violation of our Fourth Amendment rights.
I recommend that you not only talk about stopping the expansion, but you should also talk about taking down the cameras you guys already have.
You may be able to take Flock to court for violation of the contract, but you cannot undeport someone.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Hello, my name's Chris Moore.
First off, shout out to those officers out there.
Thank you for all the work you guys do.
Thank you for coming today.
And our families, the businesses in the community, thank you for all that effort.
Um, you know, there's uh there's a tendency to forget about the victims in our community and the victims that are being hurt in our community.
And this technology will help those victims and it will slow violent criminal cri uh actions.
In fact, someone mentioned about the effective effectivity of uh flock cameras earlier.
In Campbell, crime decreased 70%.
Okay, 30% less violent crime, 80% less burglaries.
So overall, this is a technology that worked, and we desperately need it in Oakland.
It's clear the data is kept in-house, it's not shared, these safeguards are for access access of live and historical data.
It's it's it's safe.
It's been talked about many, many times.
We asked for this in May.
The business community asked for it in May.
Ninety days has passed.
Stop obstructing.
Let's pass this thing.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Can you ask that there would be some respect here?
Yeah, no, I uh I agree.
That's all important.
Thank you.
Edward Escobar, Citizens Unite Coalition for Community Engagement.
We demand facts, not scapegoats.
The push to remove public safety cameras under the false narrative that they target un undocumented immigrants is not only dishonest, is dangerous.
These cameras protect communities of color who suffer disproportionately from violent crime.
To erase that protection is to abandon the very people most at risk.
Undocumented immigrants will not be blamed for Oakland's public safety being compromised by removing public safety video cameras.
That makes them the blame and won't protect them.
Exposes them to be vilified for more crime occurring.
The real threat is that recycled rhetoric from the same voices that led us into this crime wave.
Voices that ignored mass massive unreported crime, qualitative data, dismiss community please, and then want to dismantle the few public safety tools we have left.
These are the same ultra progressive ideologue voices that shielded criminally indicted Mayor Shang Tao, Alameda County DA Pamela Price, both recalled by a supermajority of voters.
I mean, Flock has a reported history of misrepresenting the effectiveness of ALPRs on numerous occasions publicly claiming this is responsible for significant reductions in crime that cannot be attributed directly to it, which you've just heard before.
Uh but also monetary settlements that drain public budgets, preventing uh with uh future harm, such as in 2024, one point nine million dollar settlements in a war in Colorado.
Sure, your time is uh based on Flock data and all that other stuff.
Please stop.
You know, yeah is that more time than what they actually deserve uh sir your time is up.
Thank you so much.
Hello my name is Dudonet Brew.
Um I'm a youth campaign organizer with urban peace movement.
Um yeah um there's a been a lot of things that's been said today um some are really fine like repulsive and problematic um considering that you know I am an Oakland born native myself and I've always been proud of to say that I'm from Oakland we we we are a place that usually leads um when it comes to making doing the right thing and and pushing forward we have a long history of doing that and the fact that we're here today talking or arguing about the legitimacy of surveilling people's lives and not actually talking about real investments like investing in community healing investing in things that actually deter crime right um but instead we have people spout spouting out nonsense about some type of crime epidemic which is quite frankly um set a bad precedent in a narrative about Oakland that isn't true right and at the end of the day we still haven't even adequately responded to the post pandemic era where we s where a lot of people experienced a lot of things and yet and still we're still talking about hypercriminalizing communities that are historically redlined for 1930 thank you sir you'll be the final in-person speaker and then we have comments um on Zoom as well thank you my name is twan no I'm part of the effort that is holding city and county leadership accountable we we call Shang Tao we recall Pamela Price every week we are on the ground with the victims with the mothers of murdered children with the store owners that were robbed these immigrants a lot of Asian immigrants jewelry store owners getting mobbed by gangs of people with guns there's not enough police to protect them and they spent decades building up their business to take care of their families and send the kids to school and within minutes their livelihood is taken away from them.
I talked to a senior eighty eight years old the family reached out to me.
You saw the video it went viral global we were talking to reporters in Japan shoved to the ground the guy had a heart at h heart attack and a stroke hit that business will not reopen Chinatown hundreds of robberies happen.
We want those cameras to be shared those images are staying in-house and you guys are obstructing your time public safety.
Before we move to Zoom I'm gonna say again we really need to have respect for each other in the room we all have the opportunity to talk we need to show respect to each other we have staff who's doing the timing I'm not gonna get into a back and forth.
I am saying that we need to show respect for our fellow community members.
We may disagree it is important to be respectful.
Felicia can we okay chair the the first person to on Zoom is David David I will allow you to talk and you have one minute.
Yeah my name is David Motorsback I'm a resident of district five I work for the county health care for the homeless program.
I um wanna reflect some of the thoughts that people had mainly about the in unsureness and the uncertainty of these times.
And I would want to talk to you commissioners to say like every day at work I have to deal with grants from C D C D SAMSA, PURSA HHS.
And we are being impacted by what a year ago I would have thought was over over speaking by saying fascism.
But now we are in that that.
That is that is undeniable now.
When things are so uncertain now, like they are now, we can't just go to our corners and and lash out and just stick to what we think is right.
For example, the last speaker.
We have to, and you all, I urge you all to think carefully and deliberately about what we're getting into with all this.
Thank you, sir.
And we're a little easier term, also, um respectfully.
Uh so Jack Linden Improvement Association, I will um allow you to speak.
Please unmute yourself.
Jack London Improvement District.
You may begin your comments.
Okay, I'll go on to the next speaker.
Raj, then you can be your beginning your comments.
Rajmi Mandal District 4.
According to the ordinance, the commission must review an impact report and youth policy and send recommendations to council.
Um, the Privacy Advisory Commission shall recommend that the city council adopt, modify, or reject the proposed surveillance youth policy.
Failure by the Privacy Advisory Commission to make its recommendation on the item within 90 days of submission shall enable the city entity to proceed to the city council for approval of the item.
It has now been a hundred and forty-seven days since this was brought forward to the commission in May.
An urgent request by OPD and members of the business community has been stalled in this commission with no end in sight.
I call city administration and OPD to submit this use policy and impact report with a contract directly to council.
It is past time that at this point, the oversight of this commission has become obstructive.
It has been 147 days of robberies and burglaries, over a thousand in areas one and two alone.
And during a time of critically low staffing, we need this urgently.
Please expedite this item to council.
Thank you, Raji.
Uh, the next speaker is Carly Cabron.
You can unmute yourself.
Hello, my name is Carly, and I reside in District 2 of Oakland.
The fact that this is called OPD community safety camera system is laughable.
This isn't about community safety.
This is about getting deeper into the dark pit of fascism and the surveillance state.
This is about control.
Don't believe the lies at the flock footage wouldn't be given to CBP Ice, etc.
CBP Ice, police departments, etc.
have been lying through their teeth throughout history and constantly act with impunity to believe that they can break the law and that they're above it.
They have worked together historically to keep oppressed people depressed.
The FBI and other law enforcement can force police departments to give them data.
This is a slippery slope.
Once you give an inch, they take a mile.
Also notice that all the people in the room are English speakers.
Can you imagine if people who are outreached for this meeting were not English native speakers?
I don't think many would be supporting flop cameras here.
This is shameful that this is even a proposed policy.
What what prevents crime is affordable housing, mental health support, etc.
I oppose plots.
Thank you, Carly.
The next speaker is Gillian.
Gillian, now will you can um begin your comments.
Hi, thank you.
My name is Gillian, and I'm a resident of District 3.
I'm calling in to express my concern and opposition to this potential PD contract with Flock.
I agree that crime is a real issue that we collectively need to address, but we have many tools in our toolbox.
Surveillance camera data that is potentially accessible by the federal government without our approval or immediate awareness is not the only tool.
The Trump administration has made clear that they are willing to disregard court orders and commit illegal acts to advance Trump's white nationalist agenda.
The FBI and CBP just last night conducted a raid on Chicago where they kidnapped dozens of people and they woke babies from their beds and zip tied their wrists all with guns in hand.
Trump has literally said that he hopes to send the same federal agents to Oakland to conduct similar actions.
Let's not make it easier for the federal government to terrorize Oakland residents.
Please do not recommend this policy to the council.
Thank you.
Thank you for your comments.
The next speaker is Jordan Hager Harger, excuse me, will allow you to talk.
Hello, my name is Jordan Harger.
I am a lifelong Bay Area resident.
I've been living in Oakland for about two years now.
I am very concerned about the proliferation of surveillance devices in our community.
And I understand that people are concerned about crime.
That's not a concern that I'm going to be able to abate in the next 45 seconds, but I can say that we know what stops crime and it's proactive community programs, it's funding housing, funding health care, giving people food, giving people jobs.
What doesn't prevent crime is surveillance.
Surveillance is always inherently retroactive.
And we are currently living in extremely fascistic and dangerous times, and it is not the time to be acting as if we can just conduct business as usual.
If we give Trump an inch, he will take a mile.
He wants to come to Oakland.
He wants federal agents in Oakland.
He's made that very clear.
And any data that we allow our police department to collect in this manner will feed to the federal government.
That's dangerous for women seeking reproductive care.
It's dangerous for immigrants, it's dangerous for all of us.
Thank you.
Thank you, Jordan.
And Jack London improvement district.
Are you ready to begin your comments?
Hi there, can you hear me?
I apologize.
I think you're.
Yes, we can hear you.
Hear me?
Okay.
So this is the Blondhauser, the executive director of the Jack London improvement district.
And I also chair the uh Bid Alliance, where in collaboration with multiple uh organizations supporting the business communities in the downtown, we are working in collaboration uh to protect the downtown neighborhoods, and we really ask that the city adopt a use policy so that we have the guidelines and we have those privacy controls in place so that we can make use of this data and not rely on price speed chases and other um and over policing and we can rely on technology and our community partnerships and and keeping our neighborhoods safe.
These systems have already proved to solve crimes and deter crimes, and uh we very much need to be using the very best tools available to support community safety.
Thank you so much.
Thank you, Sablo.
Okay, and the next speaker is Patty.
I'll allow you to speak now.
Hello, my name's Patty.
I live in District 2 on the Lakesburg cul-de-sac, and I sort of wandered into this, and I don't really have had any strong feelings one way or the other.
It's been interesting listening to both sides.
But I would say what it comes down to is the police seem to give a very good reason for using this for doing their job, and on the other side, all I hear is hypothetical.
This might happen, this could be used, this, and I think we have to recognize that we don't have enough police in this city, and we need to give them whatever tools that they need to solve crimes.
So I absolutely am for it.
They seem like they've gone out of their way to make this as good as possible.
Thank you.
Thank you, Patty.
The next speaker is Rob.
You can unmute yourself.
Hi, my name is Rob Ward, and I'm an Oakland resident.
I wanted to say that I don't support the supposed expansion of flock controlled data that surveils our daily lives.
And in addition to concerns already echoed by folks here today, I believe that data control and consolidation presents unique cybersecurity concerns, and it moves away from diversifying our investments in OPD by creating an ever-growing reliance on a contracted outside source.
They were first to say that there are other providers that are available, yet we continue to stick with flock.
Investing in local solutions preserves our autonomy, and it doesn't outsource our hopes for a safer community to a corporation that has no stake in our future.
Data aggregation is consolidation of power, and the faster that power is aggregated, the harder it is to correct harms that inevitably arise.
Every step towards normalizing all encompassing surveillance systems in our lives is largely an irreversible one.
Thank you.
Thank you, Ron.
The next speaker is Gigi.
You can begin your comments.
Hello.
Oh, I live in distribute three.
And um, yeah, don't support it.
Or I echo everything everyone said, but yeah, I feel like the whole hypothetical thing is really not a hypothetical is evidence that's happened currently.
ICE using clock cameras to kidnap our community members.
The thing is like we you can you can make a privacy, whatever, right policy, etc.
But don't let it clear your contract.
Because if you've been listening, we've been saying like all these agencies have a backdoor.
It's built into the cameras themselves.
All of our laptops, if they were built after 2007, have a backdoor to the FBI or to the CIA.
So I and the thing is, it'll be used to repress our communities, right?
To repress the kidnap, the harm.
So you can't clear your conscience.
You can't do this in good conscience, so really don't build the infrastructure for us to be repressed.
Thank you, G.
The next speaker is Al.
You can begin your comments, Al.
Please unmute yourself.
Hi, my name is Asa.
I'm a resident of Berkeley, but you know, I drive through Oakland all the time and I volunteer in Oakland.
Um there have been a number of cases across the country where Flock data that was not supposed to be shared, including sanctuary cities, has been shared with federal agencies, including OPD and SFPD.
Every time this happens, the local agencies involved either deny that it happened or shrug it off.
And Flock says we're just the platform, wasn't our fault.
Miraculously, no one ends up being responsible or held accountable.
Um there's a lot of emphasis on how Flock is supposed to report if they violate city policy, which seems like the most wildly naive thing I've heard tonight.
Um there's also nothing to stop individual officers who might, you know, support Trump's agenda, for example, from conducting searches with falsified or misleading information like the descriptions and case numbers and then providing it to ICE, which has happened uh recently in Southern Oregon.
Mass surveillance is a bell that can't be unrung.
Thank you for your comments.
The next speaker is Jesson.
You can unmute yourself.
Hi, Jess, District 3 with Oakland Rising.
When Trump threatened to unleash the National Guard, our city denounced his pushes by saying we were in a moment of transformation.
If the transformation we're talking about is over policing and the expansion of surveillance that targets our black and brown communities, I don't want it.
It's clear there's no common understanding of where data might be stored or who can access it.
To me, this means if ICE or other federal agencies wanted the data, they can and will get it, leaving our most vulnerable at risk.
What makes you better than the administration if you're enforcing the same mass amounts of militarization and control on a city level?
If y'all truly care about protecting Oaklanders, I urge you to stop the expansion, keep Oakland a sanctuary city, and protect our people by funding and making sure our communities are resourced in other ways.
Thank you.
Thank you for your comments.
There are four additional speakers here.
Uh Jennifer, you can begin your comments.
Hi, Jennifer Finley, District 2.
I remember a few years ago being in a privacy commission meeting when there was a rash of Oakland's ALPR manufacturing hysteria.
Um there was a big media campaign to make it seem ALPRs were the absolutely essential tool that we needed that was gonna save the day.
Um and the public didn't realize that Oakland had OPD had already had this tool for years, and it came out in that meeting that OPD had voluntarily stopped using ALPR because of their own volition.
It wasn't worth the the effort that they were putting in.
It's the same thing.
We don't have evidence, we don't have the data here, and there are so many risks, and they're not just risks, they're inevitabilities.
We know things are already happening.
We've already got uh weapons going through your comments.
The next speaker is Isaac Chang.
You can unmute yourself and begin your comment.
Hello, my name is Isaac Chang.
Uh I'm the Vice President of the Chinatown Chamber of Commerce.
Just wanted to say I appreciate the work of the Commission of Balance Safety and uh data privacy protections.
Um I wanted to center on just one specific point that was brought up earlier in this meeting, which it sounds like we currently the the OPD's access ha is in place through O MOU with the CHP.
That's not subject to Oakland sanctuary law or uh PAC or City Council's monitoring.
But wouldn't we want protection and control of our own contract with Flock?
Um OPD has been working with PAC for nearly half a year on this issue, and OPD has been responding to the different points in the PAC is raised, including moving to the 30-day retention period and adding protections in the flock contract, including morality clause and other protections.
And the point was also made by one of the commissioners in an earlier meeting that OPD will have ongoing obligation to report on use of the system as it's reported on multiple other of its programs in a report.
And wouldn't you we want that visibility?
I mean, thank you for your comments, Isaac.
Thank you.
The next speaker is Caleb.
I'll allow you to talk.
Hi, uh Caleb from District 3.
I've taught high school and university students statistics, which among other things introduces kids to the difference between causation and correlation.
Both the lieutenant and other speakers have referred to statistical decreases in crime as evidence for this program's efficacy, but I haven't seen anyone prove a direct relationship to echo other voices.
I'd like to see more evidence to demonstrate that this isn't mistaking causation with correlation taking credit from more effective social or community-based programs or failing to answer what actually stops one human being from taking the life of another for a program that will cost us at least two hundred thousand dollars and potentially risk violation of our civil liberties.
I hope we can hear an argument for Flock strong enough to earn an A in a college class, let alone address what leads to crime.
Thank you very much.
Thank you for your comments.
The next speaker is Arjun.
My apologies if I would urge you to vote no on this proposal.
We already have uh outside funding to OPD.
Uh why are we prioritizing expanded surveillance in this moment?
It seems like OPD has been conflating safety with even more surveillance of citizens, specifically citizens that uh can be targeted by ICE and other federal agencies.
There's a potential for data sharing here.
Um there's no safeguards that have been discussed, and it doesn't seem like there's an understanding of how this data can be shared.
Um we should be investing in housing, we should be investing in additional resources, we should not be investing in additional surveillance techniques in the city.
Uh that hasn't been shown to deter crime.
We already have extensive funding given to OPB.
Um it does not deter crime to expand surveillance on average citizen, especially in this day and age.
Just look at what's happening in Chicago right now.
Thank you.
Thank you for your comments.
The next speaker is Manny.
Hello, Manny Coco.
Resident of District Three.
I am urging the committee to vote against this item.
It seems that people have shared very different needs for this to function as a community surveillance than what the OPD has shared, and the use cases seem very small compared to the risk that putting mass surveillance data in the hands of ICE would result in our community and would ultimately violate our status as a sanctuary city.
And it does sound also like those cameras are still in uh play for um the CHP contract, so there seems to be both cameras active that could prove what the OPD is saying and um at no cost.
And ultimately, I think that our uh governor has shown the stances that he's willing to take to fight uh the federal violations of our citizens, and I would like to see Open Commons.
And your final speaker is Leanne.
I'll allow you to talk to you, Anne.
Okay, that concludes your public comment too.
Thank you so much.
Public comment is over.
Now it's time for board discussion, deliberation.
Um maybe before we start that, are there any follow-up questions for OPD that would be helpful to get out now from anybody?
Lieutenant Oquisa, if we could ask you to come back.
I feel like I became your favorite commissioner here.
Questions are good.
It's clear.
Um so I have a question about the uh surveillance impact report section I.
Uh that's on page five of the report or page twenty-six of the packet.
So third party is dependency.
So it says the CS camera system will initially uh rely on vendor or partnering agency assistance relating to mobilizing the device and maintaining um what which vendor or partnering agency we're talking about here.
I think originally when we started looking into this program it wasn't specific to SLOC.
Uh we were looking at other vendors.
Uh we've got a two key.
Sorry.
Uh obviously we never we narrow that down.
Uh in with Flock, yes, it would be this is a license-based system, so we would be renewing the leap or sorry, lease space, so we'd be leasing the the equipment.
So we will be using Flox cameras essentially.
For so just for the department managed devices.
For department management devices we'll be using Fox cameras.
Yes.
And we'll be relying flock to install the cameras.
Uh yes.
And we'd be relying flock for moving the cameras.
Uh, I don't foresee as moving them that much, but yes, if we needed to move them.
Um, we need to remove the cameras, we also need flock to remove them.
Uh yes, if we terminate, they would remove their own cameras.
Okay.
Um on August 25th, the Office of Secretary of State of Illinois uh published their announcement that they the Secretary of state found flock violated this uh Illinois state law.
Sanctuary law.
Because they shared data with um customer and border protection.
Why would that be a significant concern for us?
City of Oakland, which is a much smaller entity for this risk of future violation of of our sanctuary uh ordinance?
So specific to this technology is completely siloed off to OPD, so we wouldn't have that vulnerability.
If you're talking to the greater ALPR, the vulnerabilities for the other agencies were because they didn't have the same kind of steps that we have as far as verifying who was sending the requests and and letting them into the actual system.
So it's two different I think you're talking about two different things, but um the CS cameras themselves, that's a siloed system, it's only open to the department.
But the data would be host on a cloud, wasn't wouldn't that that be right?
And my understanding of that Illinois case it was that they provided they had a pilot program or what whatever they had with ice or CPB or C BP, sorry, um, and that they didn't tell the customers that that was the entity that was in there, so there was people accepting them into their chair system not knowing who they were sharing with.
We have systems in place that would have prevented that from occurring.
So since you brought up the uh instance with Loveland, Colorado, where um s where the uh flock enter into a pilot program with Flock, uh right.
Um with the CBP, sorry.
Um I understand that we didn't provide the notice to Flock when we signed our memorandum for understanding that we have a centricity ordinance.
But it's kinda hard to believe that the Flock wasn't aware the state of Illinois have a centricity law at the time when they set up the pilot program.
Why does not the setting up the fact they set up a pilot program with CBP?
Where it is where there's a state law prohibiting them to do so, give us pause.
I'm not quite sure what the question you're asking is.
So in theory, if we did sign this contract with Flock, part of the contract is the schedule I which requires them to acknowledge our that we're sanctuary city, and if they enter into a contract with ICE, they have to notify us.
So where they might be not be beholden to our state law, they are still beholden to our contract.
Uh so we would be able to terminate and in theory uh seek litigation.
Right.
Uh you mentioned earlier that um we need flock to install those camera, right?
For the for the department managed camera, right?
That's correct.
And they would we would need to rely on them to re uh remove them if we no longer want them.
Yes, that's correct.
Alright.
Um on September 24th, 2002, uh 2025, uh, Evanston New Roundtable News just published that um the city previously ordered Flock to remove to take down shut down the license plate reader cameras, um because of the violation I just talked about.
Because the state violation they just committed.
Um they sent that request to Flock on August 2026.
Flock did that take down 15 of them.
So t they take down 15 out of the 18 cameras uh by September 8.
Only to reinstall each one of them by the next Tuesday.
So they got an order, marching order from the city that you need to take down these cameras because you're violating our state law.
They initially take down, took it down, took them down, and they reinstall it by the next Tuesday.
Why does that not give us concern about protecting our sanctity ordinance?
I'm not familiar with the case that you're talking about, so I can't speak to that.
But we are relying on to install and remove cameras.
I mean, in the we've had devices get removed by the city for other reasons.
If we really needed to take them down, we could take them out.
So this is just a violation like within the month.
Why are we getting the benefit of doubt?
When they just commit a violation within a month, um I don't want to give the impression, like my primary objection.
I think you probably gathered this from my speech here.
Like my primary objection is not a camera system.
I understand the desire for a camera system.
I understand the Chinatown's desire for it totally.
My objection is Flock vendor.
And I asked you earlier if there are other vendors we can explore, and you said there are.
And my question is, why aren't we not exploring those vendors?
Given all this recent violations Flock just committed.
And as as I explained before, there are other vendors in the space to have the capabilities that Flock has, there's really only a few, and of those we probably run into the exact same issues that you're talking about.
Um one of the biggest issues that we have is if we got another system and say we wanted our own cameras.
There's a large amount of money we'd have to come out to purchase those cameras, install those cameras, and then maintain those cameras.
One of the benefits of the Flock system is that they're installing the cameras.
If it needs to be maintained, they maintain it.
Um so that's for us it's a far cheaper investment and uh we're getting the same capabilities that we have to spend far more money for and it's been effective and efficient so far.
So have we investigated all the other competitors or audio comparable vendors they have been working with uh CDP or ICE recently?
Just like Flock did or Well if you look at the the Sanctuary City or it's basically that company or any of its subsidiaries.
If you talk about companies like Axon who bought FUCS, which is a competitor to Flock, if you look at all the subsidiaries, all the companies they're buying, we'd run into the same problem.
So that's where we're we've seek we've sought out the best option.
This is the option that's been working, it's been effective and beneficient, and that's why we're continuing with it.
Have we done uh RFP process on this?
Have we put put put out a request for proposal to the general market?
Uh not with this because we already have the system in place.
This is an add-on to that system.
So we didn't explore all the options out there, fair to say.
Well, not through the RFP, but we have been exploring it and looking into what other companies are doing.
So we've been pre- we've been initiating that search for vendors, but we haven't put out uh announcement out there to say, hey, any interested vendor can bid on this.
Well, that's why I'm s looking at the technology that's available, this was the best option for the city at this time.
And like I said, it's I'm more concerned about the capabilities of these systems.
So if there was another vendor that could take this place and we would be able to find the money to cover it, we could, but at this point we don't have another vendor that that fulfills that need.
That's based on our investigation.
That's not based on any bits submitted to us.
I'm saying about the capabilities.
Yes, capability.
Have we put out a bit out there say, hey, we need to you to fulfill this kind of capability?
Can you let us know if you can fulfill this capability, we'll consider a proposal?
Have we done that?
No, we haven't.
Okay, so we don't know if there are other vendors out there that can fulfill their public capability.
I think looking at the different vendors and what they offer and seeing the services they offer, I haven't seen anything that's comparable to what we have.
So it doesn't make sense to seek out another bid for something that's not gonna fulfill what we need.
Um if that changes in the future I'm I'm more than open to it, but at this point that's where we're at.
How would we know if it changed in the future if we don't let people bid?
Well, by seeing how the actual systems work.
So that's kind of what we have been doing is we look at what systems are available, whether it's um this or DFR drones or any of these other things.
We look at what's in the market and then what works for us, and that's kind of what we're moving ourselves to versus doing RFP and just getting the lowest bidder that doesn't quite make sense.
Um I don't want to create the impression that my objection is purely about Flock itself, even though that's my ma major concern.
I do have concern about the user policy and uh agreement as well.
So for the user policy.
Um are these are these questions for the lieutenant or or kind of general?
Oh, I think this is a more general discussion.
I just only in case other commission no, no, no, it's great.
You have a lot to say, just wondering if other commissioners have questions for the lieutenant will exp there.
I think I do.
Okay, yeah.
Um you know I still have a lot of heartburn around um the um public private entity participating in the process.
Uh participating in becoming the uh on the registry.
I I I reviewed this registry.
And uh what what are the qualifiers?
What are the uh talk about what type of device?
What type of uh you know type of uh security parameters or round said device um it it it's not it's a little uh forgive me for getting so frank it's a little half half baked a little flimsy this registry piece um for the public private entity part of it um personally I'd like to see that let's see a little more rigor in the registration process to understand uh more about device types uh a little more um information around a little more rigor around the questioning and the vetting of that it can't it can't be just this registry I can that means my cell phone will suffice and these devices supply and give and provide and collect all sorts of data twenty four hours a day with that so that that's a separate issue.
Um so yeah I just have I have I still have some heartburn around around that piece.
Alrighty anybody else have additional questions for Lieutenant.
So is there I ask a question about that.
So I'm trying to understand what the I get the concern about devices if we own them and had all these different tech or abilities.
These are devices that already exist that are in the space and the only ability that we are going to be getting from them is to be able to view the video and the ability to view historical data.
So we wouldn't be if it does have say the camera has facial facial recognition um if they say that they have it we're not entering to the system but other there may be other things that this the camera can do that we're not going to be using it's just the viewing the camera for its video capabilities.
And I guess the other part about this there are so many different video systems that it would be very difficult to cover every single one of them.
Yes um and I think that's part of uh this process with PAC is that we come back annually so if there are issues that are highlighted or there's some capability that we see in some of these cameras that we have concern about we can address that and remove them.
Uh and part of the policy itself is say it's an area that has a view of a sensitive location.
We've talked about just if we identify that it's there we can remove it or if there's the ability to blur it will in its technologically possible we can do that.
So I'm trying to figure out the solve for this without going into every single camera system that there is and as long as we are only able to see video and historical video I'm I'm not sure what else we can do from there.
I I I I think there's I think there's some um there's some uh um parameters and some car rails that could possibly be considered then and to your point um you know we could tighten it up after the fact I'd like to do a little tightening up prior to implementation um and then and then uh make some adjustments as needed post-implementation if that happens um yeah I I think just this just Google form registry is is not sufficient for something so critical the intent of that form is to make sure that we have their consent and there's certain parameters that they understand that's required to participate um as far as the guardrails I am 100% willing to work whether it's before or after um or when we come back to the anal.
If there's appropriate guardrails I I don't see an issue with that whatsoever.
Any other questions for Lieutenant Okay.
So all good thank you so much.
Um I'm I think we're on a in a terrible catch twenty two situation here.
Uh the business community needs help in reducing the impact of crime on them and on their customers.
I've heard it asserted often over and over again about how these cameras reduce crime.
Uh I would like somebody or anybody to please send me privately some actual uh information that shows that this is true.
This is an assertion that as far as I can tell is perhaps just wishful thinking.
But unfortunately what we have is is a for me a a situation where uh you want help, uh clearly the cameras do help uh once you actually catch a criminal, it's got all that nice evidence.
Um but the vendor is very bad.
The vendor has a business model which they have demonstrated out in the open is antiqual to anything we want.
And so here's your catch twenty-two.
Uh perhaps this vendor can help uh the business community that needs the help, but I don't know, we're making w we may be making a pact with the devil.
Uh so I invite anybody who has some real evidence that the cameras actually reduce crime to please get it to me.
Because I don't believe it, but I'm willing to be shown that it's true.
You'll said anybody else want to jump in.
And I will just to kind of set the stage, encourage us to take some action tonight.
Um we should kind of wrap up our step in the process here.
Um anybody feel like sharing thoughts or yeah, I have concern um on top of a fog then as a vendor itself, which is my number one concern.
Um I also have concern about a user policy proposed use policy as well, especially given what happened recently uh with our ALRP program.
Um essentially once we upload it our data to somewhere else, it just became become out of our control, right?
Um, so for example, authorize a user section D1.
There's no limit to how many people can access uh can be authorized.
There's also no design designation who is the authorizer, who can't authorize this.
Is it subject to the authorization to the police chief?
Is it authorized to buy a specific person, specific team?
There's no description of that.
Um also the author I use is not consistent with the tier views in the later section.
So there's kind of cleanup need to do here.
Um and how long is the authorization?
Is it like one you authorized once you became a permanent you you became authorized for the rest of your life, or is it just a periodic authorization you need to renew every two years after completing a training, right?
So I think from the source, like who can access the data, we can't tighten up.
Like who can who can access this data to begin with?
Um my second objection with the permitted use, restrict restrictive use.
Um E section E1.
It just says you can use it however you want as long as it consists of the policy, which is not saying much.
I I I acknowledge that it has a bunch of prohibitive uh use, but those prohibited use half of them require you getting to the office's mind, so they state of mind to figure out if they're m acting maliciously or not.
That's not the uh functional use policy we can follow.
Like as long as the police officer say I'm not using this to h harass anybody, intimidate anybody, we don't know how if he's doing it or he or she is doing it or not.
So I don't think this is functional.
Um for restriction on use.
The rest of the policy was pretty clear.
There are three uses seems that the department is aiming for.
One is criminal investigation.
Second one is a ministry of investigation, the third one is missing person or missing or at risk person searching.
Those are all legitimate use.
If that's all we are doing this for, then we need to specifically say in the authorized use purpose section that those are the permissible use.
Anything else is in principle.
Um, I get the impression that that OPD may be up for responding to that if that would be helpful.
Sure, sure, sure.
Sorry, I thought I'm I thought we'll probably have to go back through a few of those.
Um so the prohibited use section just covers prohibited use and then the appropriate use would be the other uh things that you listed the other three items.
Um so then if it was discovered that somebody was using it in a way that's prohibited they'd be violation of private or the policy um in theory we'd open an internal affairs case and they would be subjected to discipline um and then taking off the system.
You're talking about who authorizes um in the policy it does uh I believe it's ceasefire commander and then my position currently are the ones that would be uh supplying the training and also uh deciding who has what tier of access um as far as training like time frames I'm open to adding something like that because that I don't think that that's a problem.
Uh currently we don't have that for the AOPR system but um usually the training is more for the function of the system uh and the policy itself but I have no problem doing a refresher.
Um so those things we can correct or are already are in the policy itself.
So I like what you're saying but those things are not in the use policy.
For example the authorization authorized the user it doesn't say who can authorize it.
I think what you're referring to a later section who's the custodian of certain things um which is not immediate immediately apparent to me those are the person who authorized users.
Room for interpretation.
So if those are the three primary purposes you want to use the system for then we need to say that.
And some of the authors specifically use tiered uh CS camera data access.
So for example the first one real time camera access only specific department member designated by the CS uh system administrators or chief of police shall have access who are the specific person.
Again like it it seems to set up this layer of protection without actually setting up because like only specific person who are the specific person what process do you need to go through to be designated as a specific person what are the title of this person?
So I would say section and two the first thing it says the ceasefire command and CJ operations center commanders shall be the administrators for the CS camera system.
So it would imply that those are the administrators.
Again implied.
If we want the it means that it is they are the system administrator.
Again it took me multiple reads I didn't I didn't that way so if that's what we want to say we need to say that in the use policy.
And also there is like a little bit inconsistency between sections.
For example when we talk about um real time camera data it just say it's uh it's used for active investigation what investigation we're talking about are we talking about criminal investigation only or talking about both criminal investigation and uh administrative investigation are we not excluding missing person search in this category?
So any of the authorized search reasons would uh be allowed to use real time access that's correct okay that's so broad I have no idea what that means.
No authorized use of three sections that you described so the criminal administrative or missing persons you would be able to use real time access.
Then how does that distinguish from the historical data access?
As you said you can use it for criminal administrative investigations.
Again, excluding missing persons for investigations.
So that's an even narrower scope.
I'm not quite getting what you're saying.
So in your historic history his historical data access.
You say any member of the department who's trained or provide access to a CS camera system may access here data related to a specific criminal administrative investigation.
Again, are we just allowing historical data for this type of two type of investigation only?
So we're excluding missing person uh search from here.
I think the other section would cover that.
That's what we're I think.
So missing person missing person only for No it would cover all three.
I again it will cover yeah see my confusion here.
I don't know which one applies to which if we if we wanna have a rule that we can follow we need to be specific what the rules are.
They can't just which you watch you say oh you can use it for certain things and the certain things left undefined.
Um in terms of the um the sign up sheet or I call it a sign up sheet so the l the last two pages where we provide uh people to sign up.
I think we need an additional provision to provide a notice about relevant California camera use laws.
I think there are two penal codes applicable about not allowing uh camera in to invade uh for invasion of privacy.
Uh there are specific language there.
I think there's another pending right now that's specifically targeting um it's the uh California Local Privacy Act uh that's currently pending I think in addition I I know we have a general language like you're not supposed to you're not supposed to use the camera for illicit purposes but I think that's not enough.
We need to point specific legal provisions just from a liability perspective from the c for city of Oakland.
I have no issue adding that those are all the things I have in mind.
Okay.
I think what I'm missing from the authorized use section is a very straightforward statement of what the authorized uses are.
So generally in this in an impact, excuse me in a use policy and expect to see authorized uses are A, B, C, D.
So I'm hearing active investigations so that would be criminal administrative or I guess missing persons isn't necessarily criminal so missing persons criminal and administrative meaning like I investigations and whatnot.
Are there other areas that would appropriately fall under authorized uses in your mind.
Um no and I think it's it's for that section D2 is what you're referring to.
Is the it's just laying out the three and I and I'm taking what you're saying and maybe we can have it in both um but it's more of those those three purposes.
So recording in public areas which is what's the the authorized use.
Uh recording uh an area is subject to a reasonable expectation privacy which would require exiting circumstances and then the definition of what exit against circumstances are.
So it just maybe confusions about what the difference sections are.
But we've been this is something we've been working through on different privacy policies for a while now.
It's how much to have duplicate information, how much to separate that information but as long as it's um consistent with each other and there's say there's not an additional use um that was in the section that was referred to that only had two there's not a fourth reason that's not included in the original um authorized use section.
That makes sense sounds like what you're saying is that you're envisioning those three areas you identify administrative criminal and missing persons as falling within the recording of public areas section.
That's correct, and in some cases it could be extant circumstance, but for the most part it would be public area.
I'm thinking that perhaps to harmonize what I'm hearing from the commission with what your understanding of this policy is, is that those three items should be probably more specifically delineated.
Instead of calling that recording of public areas, that should really just be authorized uses include criminal investigations, administrative investigations, missing persons investigations, and then to effectuate those authorized uses, the departments intending to record public areas.
The second section, area subject to reasonable expectation of privacy, that should more properly belong in the prohibited uses section, because that's basically what that says.
It's also covered in there as well.
So it I my recollection is that language like this is there.
This doesn't also need to be in the authorized use because it gives the impression that it's an authorized use, but it's the exact opposite.
The extent circumstances language, that's a very common thing I've seen in these policies.
I think that makes sense to keep an authorized uses.
So we're looking at where is the section?
G2.
Okay.
Do you see a need to, as has been stated, narrow down the categories here?
It sounds like from what I'm seeing here under real time, is that the real issue is live streaming for active criminal investigations or next to just circumstance.
I'm not seeing much of a reference in live streaming to administrative or missing persons.
Is that fair?
So I think in theory, say if you're investigating the misconduct by a city employee and it's happening in real time, and this policy would allow for that kind of surveillance.
So there would be a need for real time surveillance.
And I think we would all want that to be the case.
Okay.
And then obviously for missing persons, um, trying to find them in real time would be one of you know, sort of the key uses for the devices.
Um backtrack a bit.
In terms of authorized users, I'm seeing this drafted to read that authorized users are members, so our members of the department, police service technicians, the PSDs, and folks designated by the chief for their design.
And in terms of real-time access, that pool gets a bit narrower.
So members kind of writ large who are trained can access the system, but not everyone gets access to real time.
That's correct.
That's what I for the moment.
Over here.
Um, it's not good.
So I'm gonna remind my colleagues that we literally have one job, and that is to ensure that there are adequate guardrails in place so that we can responsibly use technology.
The implication if we can't ensure that we advise against use.
And I want to encourage you not to have amnesia.
And maybe even pretend this is your money.
Not the two dollars in Oakland taxes you actually pay, but pretend this is your money.
You are being asked to enter into an agreement with a vendor that intentionally use stolen data in their products, and our police department doesn't consider that a red flag.
You're being asked to enter into an agreement with a vendor that provided direct access to ice and customs and border patrol.
First problem.
And lied about it.
And OPD doesn't consider that a red flag.
The CEO of Flock recently stated, so Flock has changed their position.
His current position, courtesy of the Ford Forbes puff piece, if you read that.
Is that he is now fine with his technology being used for any purpose according to whatever rules are applicable in that jurisdiction?
If you remember those SF standard articles from just weeks ago.
In violation of the use policy and state law.
Our neighbors allowed over 4,000 non-California entities to access their data in San Francisco.
San Francisco is the number one user of our data.
This isn't just immigration.
This is red states hunting people down for reproductive care, gender-affirming care.
And our police department, and I would also throw in our city attorney, which should be concerned about risk management, doesn't consider these to be red flags, SB 34 is eight years old.
That's the law that governs how we use license plate reader data.
It preceded the PAC, it preceded the surveillance ordinance, it preceded these policy.
Other than seven months when we just didn't have license plate readers, OPD has violated that law.
And the very first week we got flock, we went right back to violating the state law and the use policy.
With the little gamesmanship about whether an MOU applies or why we don't do RFPs.
That's a whole nother thing.
I got Oakland, Berkeley, and Richmond to enact that ordinance.
And you would think the most lefty cities in the country that would choose principal over money.
It's ineffective.
That law only works if we share values.
We don't share values.
Some people just don't think these things are important.
I appreciate Commissioner Wang's comments.
This isn't about cameras.
It's about this vendor.
When we allow surveillance technology, the collection of sensitive data, when we give police authority over a lot of our lives, that's predicated upon trust.
We're trusting that they will responsibly use this technology.
We've already proven we will not use Flock according to law.
Flock has already proven they don't give a damn.
It's about dollars, they're for-profit.
They have a valuation to meet before they go public.
OPD needs to find a different vendor.
They also need to follow the law, obviously, but this vendor is filled with character flaws.
There are no adequate guardrails.
State law, contract law, or or local law, ordinance.
They've all failed.
Lawsuit, settlement agreement.
Ignored.
Breached again.
It all failed.
This is a black and white vote.
I know it's not gonna be, but this is black and white.
The surprise surprises everybody in the room.
I've never opposed the camera project anywhere in the country in my 10 years.
I don't generally have a problem with regular security cameras.
But this is definitely a no vote.
This vendor cannot be trusted.
That almost sounds like you were about to make a motion.
Would you like to do so or Commissioner Katz would like to make a motion?
Unfortunately, we are forced to deal with a very good program which will help vendors and people with an extremely flawed vendor.
Uh in light of flock safety has demonstrated a business model of aggregating any and all data that they have access to and selling it to anyone who would purchase it, including entities that Oakland prohibits working with data breaches occur whether due to accident uh breaches uh or uh inadvertent activity or deliberate the data that is then distributed can and does create irreparable harm to some.
I want to move uh that we advise Oakland uh Oakland uh council where possible uh to terminate any existing contracts with flock safety and to decline to enter into any future contracts with flock safety or its successors.
That's my motion.
Um the actual motion is that open council uh where possible terminate any existing contracts with flock safety and decline to enter into any new future contracts with flock safety or its successors.
Can I clarify to the I think that what we need to do now is is recommend adoption modification or rejection of the proposed surveillance use policy.
Does that is that incorporated in your motion of rejection of the proposed surveillance use policy?
I think it's I think it supersedes it because it doesn't matter what the use policy is.
We're asking or uh at this point uh it doesn't matter what the use policy is if we do not do any contract with Flock.
I suppose I'm not a lawyer, so if you want to modify it, go ahead.
And because of that, I don't think that's something we can vote on.
We can vote on this particular use policy, but saying that we want to recommend the kind of larger question you're addressing.
I think it's a bit beyond our packet.
Yeah, I would think maybe it could be couched in that that you propose rejection of the proposed or you would we propose you move that we recommend rejection of the proposed surveillance use policy because of X, Y, and Z maybe, but I think those are those are the actions that we can take on this item.
Okay, or somebody reformative formulated.
I my first question, and so the chair was correct, so that what we can vote on here is adoption, rejection, or modification of the proposed use policy.
That's accurate.
Um my question is um, you know, it's kind of like the conversation between shall versus May.
So when you say where possible, and I realize that's maybe tied to your original motion that we might be abandoning, but like I don't even quite know what that intent was.
And if it's moot and no longer gonna be on the floor, then don't even bother.
Okay.
Um, just I mean how you leave something open like that.
The city council's not gonna do anything with it.
Okay, I mean that was because I assume there are contracts that are not cancelable and some that are.
But I'm a whole contract here.
Yeah that's but every contract has a termination for convenience clause at a municipal level ISD.
But I think what the chair suggested if you just reframe it as saying um you know we don't believe there's adequate guardrails here and we reject the proposed use policy can reframe it that way if you want to do so they see the good work.
Sounds like you're proposing rejection of the use policy for the reasons stated.
But I think the policies we worked out with OPD are good.
That's the problem.
It's just it's the evil vendor.
I want to say it generically okay you you're withdrawing it then let me let me take a stab at it that we recommend to the city council uh that they reject this proposal as we uh do not believe there are adequate guardrails in place to protect the civil liberties is there a second second okay any discussion or vote yes okay so I think I tend to agree with you Commissioner Katz that I don't think cameras prevent crime in a way they're often marketed to do I do think they can deter crime kind of in the same way that locks can deter honest people but people who are sufficiently determined are going to break the lock and they're going to commit the crime even if it's in view of a camera what cameras absolutely provide is evidence data.
And if that evidence arrives more quickly in real time that can be useful if that evidence arrives historically that can also be useful and like we can all understand that if you're going to use evidence it can be used in positive ways and in negative ways you can hold people accountable with the correct evidence you can take someone to trial you can convict them or you can use that same evidence to harass and intimidate people the two sides of the same coin this policy and I'm looking at the locations here is particularly noteworthy seeking to partner with business improvement districts and put cameras to surveil commercial corridors and hot spots based on crime data analytics.
That's the proposal in front of us now.
If this is going to expand to a block by block network London style a little bit different than I think what we're dealing with at this moment but the spectral of that happening is not entirely remote.
That's also not this is looking at what page 23 and 24 and 25 downtown Oakland the Broadway and telegraph corridors.
Area two hotspots going up Broadway as well the the locations here seem to have been picked with some deliberate care.
I think it's noteworthy that a number of people who are operating businesses or living in these areas are speaking in favor of putting these systems where they work and live.
They want to opt in.
And we should note that as has been reported, this sharing is already happening.
OPD is already canvassing for video.
This data's already being shared with the department.
It's happening slowly.
Whether that speed is itself an issue.
I think we have to leave to the department and their oversight and council to determine that they're saying that it's a problem.
I think the chair is correct.
Our ordinance requires that we adopt modify or reject the proposal in front of us.
We cannot remain neutral.
And I think it's time for council to make a decision because we've been debating this policy for quite some time.
There's clearly some very deep disagreement here.
We've heard public comment at this meeting in our prior meeting there's clearly a great deal of division.
And I think this debate should move to council because they are the final decision maker.
That's that.
Our ordinance does require we adopt modify and reject so I think we should do that tonight.
And I think whatever we send to council we should have as strong a language as we can we've gone back and forth a number of times we've talked through some of these sections and subsections I expect this is going to be a split vote and I want to make sure that whatever council gets it as good as we can send given our own internal discussion.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Commissioner Wayne I do want to point out the characterization that this project is limited to those hand picked districts.
Um because I don't think that matches the proposed use policy.
Um the proposed use policy AU1 specifically said any camera owned or controlled by private public entity not under control of Oaklands police department is that is accessed by department.
So yes those businesses for it have already signed up they are the first one to jump in the line but that's not what this proposed policy is envisioned.
The proposal policy is anybody who has a camera can sign up to it.
Um if the police officer want to propose a much limited scope pilot program.
Limit it to those specific business districts you would have an easier time with me.
I guarantee you that so unlimited expansion it's another aspect of this proposed use policy and this project that gave me pause because there's literally no upper limit to the scope of the project.
Anybody else we have a motion a second on the table anybody want to comment the motion again that we recommend this proposal be rejected as we cannot ensure there are adequate guardrails in place to safeguard civil liberties.
Um on the location item you mentioned the department's desire to install cameras is limited to the commercial districts and hotspot areas.
But the ability for individuals to opt in kind of citywide that exists I can understand I think if the department was saying we're going to do a citywide deployment this would feel a bit different.
But if someone wants to opt in that does seem like that's their like they have that right.
And if they're going to choose to do that that's their choice to make sure we're gonna call the question.
Yeah.
Yeah we will we're just having discussion people I have anybody else?
Alright uh Felicia would you do roller call on that?
Okay, uh if if this vote passes, if it gets you know four or yeah, I mean, if I explain four percent, goes with the majority.
No, and it's standards of no vote.
Oh, I'm sorry.
Okay.
Okay, I will call the roll and I will attempt to repeat the motion on the table.
Um Commissioner Hoffer motions um recommending that city council reject the proposed policy, as they are not adequate guard rails.
Um, second by Commissioner Wang, and I will call the roll.
Commissioner Wang?
Yes.
Commissioner Hoffer?
Yes.
Commissioner Cass.
Abstain.
Commissioner Tomlinson.
Yes.
Commissioner Everhart?
Yes.
Commissioner on Vice Chair Gauge.
No.
And Chair Ludwig?
No.
Okay, the motion passes.
One no vote and one abstention.
Two no votes.
Two no votes.
All right.
That was our last item.
Commissioner Tomlinson?
Did you want to I'm just struggling with this?
Okay.
Okay.
Reconsideration is an option.
Yeah.
Did you I just consider it uh you know I like to reject I I want to change my to know.
I'm sorry.
No.
No.
Do you know Robert's rules or well enough?
So, um, the motion to reconsider.
I think it's the motion to reconsider.
I have to actually have to ask the attorney to act as parliamentarian.
Can we can we impose on a modify?
What do you mean when you say reject reject black?
I want to modify that.
It's just a little word.
Well, the motion that passed it to reject it.
Right.
And that that's what passed.
That's how you voted.
Yeah, that's how that's what's happening.
It's like voting in the negative in a way.
So I guess the question is the vote was to reject the use policy and impact statement.
So as it stands, this is going to go to council with a negative recommendation.
Is that something we're okay with?
Okay.
If you're okay with that, then we don't need a parliamentary.
Okay.
Thank you to everybody who came tonight.
Thank you.
I'm sorry, what?
Meeting adjourned.
Meeting adjourned.
Okay.
So that's the right thing.
I have my little um contract change when we turned it up.
We are probably evidence in my whole party.
Good afternoon, everyone.
Welcome to the life enrichment committee meeting of Tuesday, October 14, 2025.
The time is now four twenty-five p.m.
and this meeting shall come to order.
Do the chair can the chamber door be closed, please.
Before taking roll, I will provide the instructions on how to submit a speaker's card for this meeting.
If you are here in chamber in which to speak to any item on this agenda, please fill out a speaker's card and hand it to a clerk representative before the item is called into record.
Speaker cards will be accepted when the first in the first ten minutes of this meeting, this meeting came to order at four twenty-five pm.
Therefore, speaker cards should be submitted before or by four thirty-five p.m.
Online speaker requests were due twenty-four hours prior to the start of this meeting, which was yesterday, Monday, by four PM.
I will now proceed with taking roll of members present.
Showing all four members present.
Moving to our first item, item number one, approval of the draft minutes from the committee meetings held on July eighth, twenty twenty-five, july twenty-second, twenty twenty-five, and september thirtieth, twenty twenty-five, showing no speakers.
Thank you.
The motion passes with four eyes to accept the draft minutes from the pre from those previous meetings.
Moving to item number two, determination of schedule of outstanding committee items.
Any outstanding items from the administration.
I'll entertain a motion.
Second.
Move by Councilmember Guile, seconded by Council Member Wong to accept the draft to accept the pending list as is on roll.
Council members.
Guile?
Aye.
Houston.
Aye.
Wong.
Aye.
And Chair Five.
Aye.
The motion passes with four eyes to accept the pending list as is.
Moving to item three.
Adopt a resolution waiving the local small local business enterprise program requirement and waiving the competitive bidding process and authorizing the city administrator to execute a second amendment to a professional services agreement with child care careers LLC to increase the amount of the previous contract by an additional $500,000 for total amount not to exceed $1,250,000 for as needed substitute teacher staffing services for the contract period fiscal year 2022 through 2027.
Thank you.
We'll put five minutes on the clock for our presenter and go.
You have the floor.
Oh thank you.
An additional $500,000 to this contract because they are the only substitute agency in the area that has responded to RFPs.
We have used them for the last few years and they meet the requirements that are necessary for all of our state, federal, and local funds.
They allow us to keep our services open, our classrooms open.
Because we are funded by three different funding agencies, our ratios vary.
So for infants, we have to have one qualified adult for three infants, toddlers, it's four for one with to one adult, and then for preschoolers, it's one adult for eight children, which is very low if you look at private preschools.
We cannot operate if we don't have those numbers.
We also have recently moved to year-round option for our infants and toddlers to meet the need of working families, and also 10-hour days.
Because of this, we have implemented a process with our teaching staff that where we still want to allow them the time they need to go to their children's events for vacations, they get sick, and so having these sub-services allow them to take care of themselves, meet their family needs without having to close our doors.
Did you have anything to add?
No, nothing else to add.
Um we well, I'll add one more thing.
So also with these sub-services, we are able to request long-term subs.
So we don't, if we need a sub and we know someone's going to be out for a month or for two weeks, we can request them for what we call a long-term sub, which then allows that continuity of care.
Teachers get to know them, children get to know them, families get to know them, and we've also had success in bringing them on as City of Oakland employees when we really like them too.
So it's a good way for us to feel that out as well.
Thank you.
I remember performing services as a long-term sub.
And so yes, that is a good way to get the foot in the door.
Um, are there any questions or comments from the committee before we go to our public speakers?
Councilmember Guile.
Yes, um, can you share with us what is first of all?
We're what is the relationship between the program and the Oakland Unified School District?
And secondly, what are the numbers in terms of children?
Are they I know in the past we used to have our parks and recreations open to serve the children, but now many of the parks and recs are closed and closed on weekends specifically.
What is the relationship currently?
So our relationship with the with OUSD, we do partner with them when children are old enough to transition to um TK or Kinder.
We also transitioned with their special ed department.
Um, once we once children turn three and they need assessments, um, but our age groups are very different.
So we're infant toddler and preschoolers, and we get them ready to move into the OUSD school system.
So we have that partnership where we get them ready and keep the communications going.
We aren't open on weekends, so the the gap that you're speaking of, even with the parks and rec, that's not something that we're able to fill.
We have been able to fill the summer care with for the infants and toddlers, and this past summer, we were able to work with Parks and Rec to get some summer camp slots for our Head Start Children that we paid for.
And what what is the age group of the children?
The age group in our program, it's uh we have pregnant participants and we have infants, toddlers, and preschoolers, so zero to five.
And that's throughout the city.
Correct, throughout the city of Oakland, yes.
Thank you, thank you.
We'll call on the public speakers, please.
Oh, I'm sorry, Councilmember Houston.
That's okay.
I wanted to find out how you doing.
Hi, I'm fine, thank you.
I want to find out how much um will this impact district seven and what locations and and yeah, how much will it affect district seven?
Um, I was just talking to another one of my colleagues earlier.
We do have a number of centers in district seven, and so we will use them in district seven as needed.
We use them throughout all of our programs as needed.
Um I believe we have we have two centers in district seven.
Um, right now, actually, we have a long-term sub at one of our centers that has allowed us to keep our preschool classroom open.
Um, and so these subs are they go to any of our centers that are that are needed.
Thank you.
Yeah, where's the location that where they'll be?
It varies where it depends on where staff call out or where we we need someone to fill in.
So it's through all of our centers throughout City of Oakland.
Okay, thank you.
Yeah.
And I will share with my colleagues that this contract is very critical because when you do have Head Start staff that call out, then um if there's no one to cover that shift, then they have to close, right?
So I I do have a question um to staff.
Do um how often or how frequently have closures had to happen, and then do families have to find other child care services for the day when we don't have staff due to illness or whatever reason they may be absent.
So um we get very creative.
The last time we had to close for the day was maybe a month ago, and it is a hardship for families, and that was our arroyo center.
We had absolutely we didn't have any staff at all that day, and it's not safe to have two substitutes.
They don't know the kids, they don't know our processes, so it was the safest bet to close for the day.
Um what we have we do get creative and the center directors will call each other and say, Hey, can you come and help me with breaks for 30 minutes?
Um, do you have someone to spare?
If you know if maybe attendance is low at another center, um so it it is tough for the families.
We try to get as creative as possible so we don't have to do it.
If it's a multi-classroom center, we combine classrooms as much as we can without going past our licensing um regulations, but to your point, because we've had this um partnership, this contract with them, the closures have been far in between.
Um prior to me coming on, there were a lot more closures in terms of uh because the staffing and then even the sub company didn't have enough.
Um, yeah, because the staffing shortages is everywhere.
They've since um increased their staffing, um, and then also for a short time the contract ran out when we had to get really creative, which we understand we we hadn't paid them yet, but um they felt it and they said, you know what, you can you can start using us again.
We know you're going through the process and how long it takes.
So that was a really tough period about a month ago as well, but um, really proud of the staff and everything they did to keep the centers open.
We had people from central office giving breaks, um, just really working hard to keep the centers open.
So, yes, the contract is extremely helpful, so that families who need to work, um, aren't stuck.
I wanna just get clarity on a statement you just made.
Are we currently in arrears in terms of payment to how much?
Um, right now we're uh about a hundred thousand in arrears.
This contract will cover that, or are they awaiting a payment from no, it'll cover it.
This contract will cover it, and then it'll it'll get us through the next two years as well.
Okay, yes.
Uh-huh.
Ms.
Asado Olabala for item number three.
If you could introduce yourself.
Can we have the mic on?
No, it was there we go.
Chrisha Esquival, education manager.
The report identified that we currently have 26 teacher vacancies in the classroom, and that's uh 25% of our classroom for workforce is not being uh attended to.
And the issue I want to address is the attrition loss of eight staff members uh voluntarily leaving.
There was a report given out at a meeting of the uh Head Start Board, advisory board, and a document uh had some statements from the S E IEU 1 1021, and they were saying something about uh individuals working as staff members, some of the issues.
There's widespread uncertainty and and frustration among staff and parents due to poor communication from leadership.
Many staff members feel that they have disregard have been disregarded or mistreated by management over a long period of time, concerns were raised about the lack of inclusion of staff's voices in decision making, in addition to low-pay staff are also concerned about how they are treated on a daily basis by leadership.
Leadership has been unrepresented, unresponsive to staff concerns, which has negatively affected morale.
There is strong call for clear guidance, transparency, and meaningful engagement among moving forward.
So if all of these issues are going on, according to people who are working as staff members, even if you're hiring people and these issues identified as being concerns, they have to be addressed at some time.
So when are these issues are going to be addressed?
I know they have had people come here.
We got lawsuits against Hair Start.
We got people who come here African Americans say they can't get hired at his start.
We got people saying African Americans are denied attendance.
Hi, I uh thank you for producing this report and and your work on this.
Um I'm just trying to understand what are we gaining exactly like?
Do we have a metric?
And this is a common, not just directed at you, but in general, some of these contract amendments I've been seeing come to me where I can't figure out what exactly we're getting for the money that we're approving.
So can you just explain that?
Yes, and I'll uh so the way that um child care career sub works, they're essentially a temp agency, but for teachers, and so you pay, excuse me, based on the level of teacher.
They have what they call experienced teacher who has a bachelor's, uh, an assistant teacher, and I believe an aide.
And so each of the levels costs something different, right?
Like that they have a different amount.
So we get charged by the day per hour, and like any temp agency, um, we pay a lot because the company has to make a certain amount of money as well.
So, depending on how many hours a day we use them, how long we use them, and the level, that's how we get charged hourly for the staff.
And on any given day, we can have one, we can have four, we can have five at different levels.
So it really varies um based on either what they have available that day or the length of time that we need them.
And so, with this additional $500,000, do we have an estimate or do we build into our contracts that there's an expected number of hours that's going to be provided?
No, so this is this this operates similar to an open purchase order where we know it's available for us to use uh as we need it.
So if tomorrow we need to call in for three different subs at three different locations, um then we go into the system and and we make our order for a sub, if you will, and depending on the level that they send us, that's how we're charged.
Okay.
So we spin spin down that amount.
If now I'm not saying that is this is likely, but let's say our we fill up these vacancies and we actually have a fantastic um permanent teacher rate, and we don't need these substitute teachers.
Do we have any provisions to ensure that we can actually recruit that funding as a city?
We don't.
Um however, even if we fill all of our vacancies, there would still always be a need for a sub pool because people get sick, um, you know, maternity leaves, long-term um LOAs, so we don't for a while the city was trying to recruit its own sub pool or sub, you know, so that we can have internal subs.
Now we've moved to recruiting full-time.
Um, but there will always be a need for a sub pool.
Okay, I think, and I've made this comment to not just you, but a number of staff who have come before me today with just the request that we start looking into ways to hold people accountable to certain metrics, and if maybe we don't need that service or they don't hold up, that um we have some ways that we can as a city recoup some funds.
Yeah.
Now that makes sense, thank you.
All right.
I want to thank the city clerk for trying to help our public speakers understand how to properly fill out a speaker's card.
I will recognize the public speaker for a minute.
Um, and then we'll continue on with the agenda item.
Um, v the United States, um, in view of a shurion via the US and moving the the US alma Linux Rocky is an illegal stream.
Um, what is wonder to the Oakland promise is a validation of intergovernmental agencies uh based on competitive view to pay performance and then using it in Guadapa?
Um I asked that there be a view um part-time employment to child care at five to one uh within tracking to college education.
Um I ask that the state valid date and the legal use to the cell phone as well as it within the trial careers.
Um I ask that there be a mitigated viewpoint um to the use of it as um stable employment as well as education.
Um I wish to challenge a request and view of the allocation for the Oakland promise, um, against the state.
Thank you for your comments.
To the committee, are there any other comments or questions that you have for staff?
I will say that um head start is under attack by this federal administration, and on April 1st of this year, the president and his administration closed our regional office in San in San Francisco along with several other regional offices across the country, which is why it's so critical that we are doing everything that we can to ensure that we have adequate services, and Oakland has a lot of challenges.
This being one of them, but this is a step in the right direction to ensure that we are taking care of Oakland's most vulnerable and precious.
That's our our children.
So I will entertain a motion on this item.
So move move removal approval.
Second, don't worry about it.
Thank you.
We have a motion and a second.
There's a motion made by Councilmember Giles seconded by Council Member Wong to approve the recommendations of staff and forward this item to the October 21st city council agenda on consent on roll.
Councilmember Skyo.
Aye.
Houston.
Aye.
Wong.
Aye.
And Chair Five.
Aye.
Thank you.
The motion passes with four eyes to forward this to next week's city council agenda on consent.
Moving to our next item, item number four.
Adopt a resolution one authorizing the city administrator to accept and appropriate Head Start basic training and technical assistance, early Head Start, basic and training and technical assistant grants for fiscal year 25 through 26 from the U.S.
Department of Health and Human Services.
Administration for Children and Families, Office of Head Start, and an estimated amount of $13,797,057 and committing the necessary local match.
And two, authorizing an estimated offset of $3,414,908.81 for fiscal year 25 through 26 central services overhead charges charges and three awarding grant agreements to fund comprehensive early care education and family services to community service providers identified in table three for fiscal year 25 through 26 for total amount not to exceed $2,760,120 and for authorizing the city administrator to accept and appropriate additional federal head start early head start funds if they become available within fiscal year 25 through 26 and amend the grant agreements within the limits of the federal ward.
And we do have two speakers on this item.
Okay we will set five minutes on the clock for our presenter and then we will hear from our public speakers.
Good afternoon.
My name is Tracy Black.
I'm manager of governance and state contracts for early childhood family services division in the human services department.
So good afternoon, Chair Five, members of the Life Enrichment Committee.
Thank you for the opportunity to present this item.
I'm here today to request the City Council adopt a resolution authorizing the city administrator to accept and appropriate 13,797,057 in federal Head Start and Early Head Start grant funds for the fiscal year 25-26 and to commit the necessary local match to support early care education and family services for children and families in Oakland.
To provide a brief overview, the city of Oakland uh first received funding to provide Head Start services in January of 1971, and subsequent funding to provide early Head Start services in 2009.
The Oakland Head Start program delivers comprehensive early care education and family services currently to 622 infants, toddlers, and preschoolers, pregnant people and families in Oakland.
Services include center-based early learning, center-based early learning, home-based, home visiting programs, a model mobile classroom services and family child care partnerships across 26 locations citywide with a majority in east and deep Oakland where need is the highest.
Oakland Head Start Centers, equity, and community impact.
Head start advances the city's equity priorities by serving families with the greatest need.
Over 79% of enrolled children live in Oakland flatlands.
70% identify as black or African American sorry black or Hispanic or Latino and more than 60% speak a language other than English at home.
The program provides culturally responsive services trauma informed healing centered supports family advocacy and family engagement.
Fiscal responsibility is critical to our work the total program cost for fiscal year 2526 is 20 million five hundred and six thousand two hundred and sixty six this does include thirteen million seven hundred ninety seven thousand fifty seven in federal funding and six million seven hundred and two seven hundred nine thousand two hundred and nine in general purpose fund um support to meet the required 20% local match adoption of this resolution protects federal revenue and um supports compliance with with grant requirements the Oakland Head Start program is strong is in strong federal standing in March 2025 the program passed the focus area to federal monitoring review with no findings and was recognized for six areas of strong practice including program governance data driven and data driven improvement.
The Office of Head Start also confirmed Oakland's eligibility for a new non-competitive five year grant cycle in fiscal year 26 30 to 31 approval of this resolution ensures the continued local stability uh local education system I'm sorry excuse me approval of this resolution and ensures continued educational stability for six hundred and twenty two children and families leverages federal and local investment and advances school readiness and maintains compliance with federal regulations um staff requests that this item be forwarded to the full city council for recommendation for approval thank you again for the opportunity to present this item for questions thank you any immediate questions council member guy how many how many children are we currently serving in Oakland six hundred and twenty two are the number of children that were proposing to serve with this head start grant six hundred and twenty two infants toddlers that we're proposing to serve with the funding they were but currently enrolled in the program what are the numbers let me just double check I'm looking at our report right now and if you don't have that number have you seen the numbers grow through the years are they increasing or decreasing in terms of the request in terms of the you want to share um Tricia our current actual enrollment in Head Start only 400 eight four hundred and eight out of six four hundred and eight out of six hundred and twenty two funded slots four hundred and eight children currently enrolled in the program huh as of September and we're continuing to recruit and then so the numbers keep growing and we're wanting the numbers to continue to grow that's the that's the the plan and our staff capacity also makes a difference.
We're actually uh 97% thank you Trisha so 97% enrolled based on staff capacity and that's our teaching staff so they work hand in hand okay okay other questions through the chair Ms.
Black how are you I think you can you pull up the the can K Top pull up the early childhood and family services continuation application a six page that I had you guys send to me.
Please can I pull that up I don't know that K Top can I did not give them our report we could okay we could keep going and then send it to them because I want because I have some questions about this and I heard my council member five uh mention to me I'm gonna say her words and you're referring to page six of the report is six pages is called the early childhood and family services continuation application life enrichment committee.
Can you pull that up for me?
Okay thank you thank you can you is it possible to sit in the sended K Top at Oakland except um you did receive that report right you said you received the PowerPoint presentation that no I received yeah I received a six page of okay piece.
Okay okay okay because I have some questions on these numbers okay do we have time to arrange for the slides to be sent to K Top?
Not at the moment no that would have had to be sent to uh the clerks and K Top before the meeting in time to be included in the present presentation.
Okay.
So what we can do is maybe answer questions that you have now.
So this was a part of it, so why can't we pull it up?
It was not a part of the staff report.
We received I did the requests this morning.
What are the do you have questions about these are the numbers?
This is the numbers of the early head start numbers of um age, race, and gender.
I just got questions about it because um you had mentioned, and I love the words you said, just um the most vulnerable children, you know, we need to serve the most vulnerable children, and in my district.
Um my black young kids is the most vulnerable in my district.
And and I see some numbers here.
This is some high percentages of others, but not high percentages of my black children in my district that's the most vulnerable.
Um, this should have been a part of it.
So council member Houston, we can I think respond to some of your questions here.
My colleague Trisha Barua, Dr.
Trisha Barua can at least answer some questions.
I if council member Houston, what are the questions that you have for staff?
About the the participant um participant race and equity when it goes to the Hispanic, American, Indian, Indian, Black American, African American.
I just wanted to know give me some details on do we have the details on how many boys, and it's only like 26%.
I just wanted to go over then they said something about the males and females.
I just wanted you to go over that page number two for me and page number three.
Um, so uh just to uh clarify my name is Trisha Barra.
I'm a program planner with early childhood and family services.
Um we sent in um some data in response to requests from um your office uh yesterday.
We sent it in this afternoon, which is why it's not in the um uh public report.
So um in the first uh couple pages of that PDF regarding it says like age, race, gender, um, as well as early Head Start and Head Start demographic side program option.
This is data from uh 24 our program 2425 program year um for our federally funded sites and this is program-wide data.
Um when it comes to the uh participant race and ethnicity um last year overall, uh 26% of our participants are black and African American, and 51.8 percent uh were uh Hispanic, and this crosses centers, um, or child care centers, home base, which is our home visiting option, and family child care, so home um child home home-based child care, um, three I mean our three main program options um and uh the uh uh side you mentioned with um the smaller percentages.
We have a race ethnicity breakdown based on um program option.
So for example, uh were center-based, 57.7 percent um of participants last year were black or African American.
Um 11.6% of participants uh uh and home base were black or African American, and 35.1% um were in our uh family childcare participants were uh black or African American.
So you can see that like center-based program options are the ones that are um primarily utilized by our black communities.
So like our first couple slides, that's program-wide.
Um, the next ones that they say like district seven, right?
So that's specifically, there are two ways to look at it.
Like our district seven sites, which include four family child care sites, um, one head start preschool, Brookfield, and one early head start infant toddler and head start preschool site, which is 85th.
So um across our FCCs, family child care and um or head start, early Head Start sites.
We have um 31.2 percent enrollment of uh black and African American uh students, and then 58 percent Hispanic or Latino, all other groups are under five percent, and then the rate the the gender breakdown um is like forty four point six percent um female and fifty five point three eight percent um male, and all in all, these uh sites in district seven, they have um fifteen point four percent of total enrollment in our federally funded program citywide.
And then the last um side with data um and I'm essentially just like reading this out loud so everyone can kind of see this or get a sense of the information in there.
Um so I honed in um so like participants do not necessarily live in the same district or zip code is where their site is located.
So um we pull data for uh participants whose home addresses are in zip codes nine four six oh three and nine four six two one um for so twenty-six point seven percent of Head Start and early Head Start participants live in those two district seven zip codes and what's interesting um and I think it's uh worth uplifting our home base programs because forty-one point six percent um so just under half of district seven residents are enrolled in home-based program options which include Sprite Beginnings, one of our partners, and then our own City of Oakland um home based program as well as our mobile classroom program program that serves um unhoused families.
Um and uh you can also see that um money uh district seven participants, they go to sites that aren't in um their own zip code or they aren't in district seven, but they go citywide.
Um and then just to amplify or uplift um the racial demographic numbers, um, with district seven, um twenty or with with nine four six oh three and nine four six two on, um that's twenty-one point nine eight, so almost twenty-two percent um black or African American and sixty-three point six Hispanic or Latino.
You did a great job, but I'm giving you that just yesterday.
You did excellent.
Um, I want how do we bring that up from that 21 point um nine date and balance it out with the sixty-three point sixty one and I'm continue to say the same thing every day.
Every time I get up here, I'm half black and I'm half Latino.
I want it to be even, right?
So I see that we had twenty my black side is twenty-one point ninety-eight.
How do we get that up to you know balance it out with that sixty-three percent?
That's my main concern.
We do we were just sharing we need more teachers.
Yeah.
Black black families, like, to the mic to the mic, get to the mic.
Yeah, black families overwhelmingly prefer center-based options in in relation to um uh our home-based and family child care option.
So if we had more teachers, if we staffed up our centers, then we would most likely enroll more black children and families into our program.
Just do it, I'm moving.
Thank you, Councilmember Wong.
And we also need to pay teachers a a living wage, so that's more of a thank you, Dr.
Barua.
Uh thank you, Chair.
Um, I I'm just having a little trouble following some of this reports, uh, just specifically page 10.
Uh table six.
And um, I'm just trying to understand it.
It's like 622 slots is the the key thing.
Correct.
What is table six?
Um what what is this table illustrating?
Because I see numbers like um 1,292 slots, the 330 in the first column, what is that depicting?
So it's it's breaking down our enrollment across our head start, you know, early Head Start program and then totaling it to 622.
So you see that in early Head Start across uh the different uh the grantee funded sites and our partner sites, we have 30 330 slots, and for head start uh across our grantee and our partner sites, we have 292 slots, which totals 622.
Oh, okay, 292, not 1,292.
Okay.
No, we're just I was um confused about that, but thank you for clarifying that.
Um my other question, and don't get me wrong, I'm very supportive of early childhood programs have worked on Head Start myself.
Um I'm just wondering, have we been able to, and maybe I don't have the history around this, been able to get the county to support this at all?
Um it looks like this is requiring six um is it million dollars in matching funds from general funds and um I did a quick search and it looks like it's pretty common place like Contra Costa County actually administers the head start program LA County administers the head start program it's Monterey but maybe that's not a good example but anyways you can see pretty commonplace San Diego I believe the county supports and I'm just wondering if we've had any conversations around the county at least co-administering the program and supporting with some of their funds.
We have not but we can look into it okay um like I can't answer that question for you okay with detail okay but it's certainly something that we can take back and look into and and come back to you.
And I'm happy to advocate with the supervisors as well that um this is something that is commonly funded and supported by counties and that we um the county should also think about their role in supporting us here too one thing is very specific is that um uh the process does involve the the grantee actually being um a county grantee versus like a city grantee so it it starts off with that person or that agency or that entity being the primary grantee or can you explain that sorry not totally following so the the county would need to be a primary grantee in order to okay yes and so we don't we don't know much about um that history with the county we do know the structure of the county office of education of an Alameda um and we can like I said look into whether that's something that'd be possible.
Sounds good.
Thank you so much.
And thank you for your question.
I will say that there has been conversation that's been floated over the last couple years about the county being involved in Head Start and we had immense pushback from many of our childcare providers many in the industry so that is a significant shift in something that has not happened uh in the city of Oakland before and just know you are opening the floodgates and so if we if if that is something that's considered we have to have deep community involvement because uh that's just that's not something you can just flip a switch and turn on the county doesn't currently have the infrastructure to administer a Head Start program so I just wanted to state that for the record just because I've been here for a little bit and I know several of the service providers Councilmember Wong did you have something to share before was the nature of the pushback like what were the uh critiques levied I would I would love to have that conversation with you offline just because it hasn't been agendized um but it is uh there's been a lot of conversation on the record and I can connect you with some of those service providers as well I I did have one or two questions before I I take a vote on this item so um and and we have public speakers too thank you um Ms.
Black is are any of these funds set aside for or allocated or could be used for operational costs at some of our sites it looks like there's three sites that these funds are going to but um I've just been made aware by some of our staff and parks and rec that there are operational costs that haven't been paid at at city funded or city run sites.
But we also have historically been at park and rec sites if you're if you're referring to park and rec sites uh in exchange it has not there has not been a a fee for that is that what you're referring to people are asking to be paid for um the space that we're using in park and rec and that's not what these funds are are used couldn't be utilized for.
Not at this time.
No.
We do have operational costs.
We have um lease, you know, lease costs, utility costs, uh, maintenance costs.
So that's operations um but nothing specific to uh leasing arroyo, Tassa Faranga, Franklin, Manzanita, Manzanita, San Antonio Park, all of those.
Nothing related to paying rent at those spaces.
Okay, thank you.
Are there any other questions or comments from the body?
Then we'll go to our public speakers.
Mr.
Sada Olabala and Zach J.
Uh, unfortunately, the statement that we are going to be able to have stable stability with this is not true.
Uh the head start uh is in flux because in July of 2025 uh Trump with his craziness uh uh passed something that would allow for public funds not to be accessible to our undocumented community.
The courts are have that on whole, but there's a possibility that could come f to fruition.
Um I'm a little bit confused about identifying a breakdown of how this money would be used because uh there has been statements about lack of equity at certain facilities uh that had uh head star facilities, particularly the ones in Mr.
Houston's and district six and seven.
Uh I'm also concerned.
Does this money in any way a part of the seven sites that are run by the Spanish speaking unity council of Alameda County, or is are there fundings for head start start separate?
I'm also concerned because whenever I hear report from the head start advisory committee from staff, there's always a waiting list that's a part of the reporting.
So with this six hundred and twenty-two, you're saying that this is gonna accommodate everybody, or we gonna go through some type of prioritization process.
How many kids will actually be capable of conduct coming under the umbrella of being served by head start?
It's gonna be more than six hundred and twenty-two hours soon because that's the histor the history of how head start has work.
Every child who needs to be accommodated is not necessarily accommodated because we we can't do it, but my my main thing is.
Um the Moderna validity to COVID is invalidating it compared to Alma Linux and Rocky.
When this is wondered to instead of it to Dean models, I mean college professors, and their inability to get their PhD in certain we uh Berkeley and UC regions via Doe and Rubenstein v Doe.
I guess I'm not that agent.
When that is wondered and tracking, uh that wouldn't be the specifics.
The reason I am asking that this be investigated.
Um, when we're tracking it instead of food language differences compared to how you see math and science, I guess as somebody uh it's the alcoholic community called NATO.
I guess all Seventh-day Adventist and Islamics eat pork and drink when you're asking it in American Canyon, Vallejo, and Fairfield to tracking it in Southern Methodist University as a model.
I do ask that the Honorable Jeffrey White, Mr.
Kemper, report.
Thank you for your comments.
Are there any other questions regarding this agenda item for my colleagues?
If there are none, I will entertain a motion.
Through the chair, we do have a motion made by Councilmember Houston.
Just need a second.
Thank you.
There was a motion made by Councilmember Houston, seconded by Councilmember Gallo to approve the recommendations of staff and to forward this item to the October 21st city council agenda on consent on roll.
Council members Guyo.
Aye.
Houston?
Aye.
Wong.
Aye.
And Chair Five.
Aye.
Thank you.
The motion passes with four ayes to send this to the October 21st, City Council agenda on consent.
Showing two speakers for open forum.
Ms.
Asado Labala and Zachary Faith.
I'm deeply concerned about the human services department lacking a true director.
The interim director position has been in place for a substantial long period of time.
I don't understand why an individual who has been historically working in the economic workforce and development department is now the interim director of human services with no official capacity to have expertise.
And this individual submitted the recommendations around homelessness and how we are going to perhaps defund 18 programs with one-year contracts and six months contract related to the homeless community.
This individual has no historical background on dealing with housing for the homeless, but has made these decisions.
This individual has had no scope of work related to head start.
Why is the department of human services not having leadership based on some type of capacity to make decisions?
That's not happening.
I heard these expertise right here, I don't know how long they've been in the department.
Why weren't they moved up to be interim?
What is behind this?
This is serious.
And I just read to you a document that said people who work in Head Start as employees are disappointed with the lack of leadership, how their voices are not being heard.
I don't know how this move was made, that this person was put in, I'm not gonna call a name because I'm sure they have expertise in some area, but it's not in the human services department.
So let's get somebody in that department who can produce some leadership.
I heard some excellent leadership.
So it's open form again.
And Anderson V the organization, O'Kim v.
The U.S., thinker via the state of California and Revis v U.S.
and James Huntman v the United States.
Um, I am asking that the validity of the interim designation, Congressional medal of freedom, gross malice, and intentional negligence in view of a prisoner of war, based on the war department, and blatant gross malice and intentional negligence uh be seen against the state of California, um city of Oakland County of Almid.
Uh state of California, maybe the United States.
Um, what is wondered to uh asset allocation, rift of uh the PAC Act and tied to uh the food stamps to no child left behind isn't wondered on the original model uh with this big of a uh family application and what happens tonight isn't the promise.
Most of these families are people within a forty-five minute location that go back and forth.
Um as a city administer, being told I am overqualified for every job that I apply for an open stream on Linux Rocky, uh, based on the the view.
Um is it understood?
Uh it's not Reddit because it's not a script.
Uh it's not an understanding of it when it clearly is the 27th J6 and justified.
I am asking that in view of a bond allocation holding of the Rothschild Rockefeller, uh Ames Kennedy uh job in the Elden Anderson estate uh be identified in tri-regional.
I'm asking the um there be a wonderment um and first republic uh in Chicago title against um the small business development tied to bond holdings and the regulatory reform act tied to the interbanking act.
Thank you.
I believe that concludes our public speakers for this item.
Thank you to my colleagues on this committee and to all the city staff.
I appreciate your service.
Thank you all.
This meeting is adjourned.
Um, we have a good, good morning, and welcome to the Public Works and Transportation Committee meeting of today, Tuesday, October the fourteenth.
The time is now eleven thirty a.m.
This meeting has come to order.
Before taking roll, I provide instructions on how to submit a speaker's card for items on this agenda.
If you're here within chambers and you would like to submit a speaker cards, please fill one out and turn into myself before the item is read into record.
Online speaker requests were due 24 hours prior to this meeting, making that time yesterday at 11 30 a.m.
Speaker requests were the meeting came to order at 11 30.
Speaker requests are due 10 minutes after the meeting has begun, making that time eleven forty a.m.
With that, we will now proceed to take roll.
Councilmember Gaio.
Councilmember Houston is excused.
Councilmember Houston is absent.
Council Member Wong?
Present.
Thank you, and Chair Unger.
Here.
Thank you.
We have three members present, one absent Houston.
And with before we begin, Chair Unger.
Do you have any announcements?
No announcements and uh Councilmember Houston is in the room and present.
Thank you.
Noting Councilmember Houston present at 1131 a.m.
Moving to item one approval of the draft minutes from the committee meetings held on June 24th, July 8th, July 22nd, and September 30th, 2025.
And you do have two speakers for this item.
What zero speakers for this item?
Zero speakers, the item.
Alright, let's uh.
Do we have a motion for the minutes?
Move approval, but I want to hear from the public first.
I believe there are no speakers.
We're looking for approval of the minutes.
So I make a motion to approve the minutes.
Thank you.
We have a motion made by Councilmember Gaio, seconded by Councilmember Houston to accept the draft minutes from the committee meetings held on June 24th, July 8th, July 22nd, and September the 30th, as is on roll.
Councilmember Gaio.
Aye.
Councilmember Houston.
Aye.
And Councilmember Wong.
Aye.
And Chair Unger.
Aye.
Thank you.
The motion passes with four ayes.
Two accept the approval of the draft minutes of the committee meetings held on June 24th, July 8th, July 22nd, and September 30th as is.
Moving to item two, which is determination to schedule an outstanding committee items.
And this is also known your pending list, and you do have two speakers for this item.
Let's do the speaker first, please.
Move into our public speakers.
Want to call your name, please approach the podium, state your name for the record, and you do have two minutes.
William L.
Harpak, excuse me if I mispronounced your last name, and Miss Asada.
Excuse me if I mispronounced your last name.
I hold the mics on the screen.
Yeah.
So uh I'm I'm here because I'd like to get a report as to how the city and the city council at large makes the decision to what neighborhoods get parking permits and what neighborhoods do not.
Now, in particular, myself, I live in 15th and Harrison.
Fife is my representative.
However, I don't know how long I'm going to be able to support her because my community is getting nothing from this office.
In the sense of I've lived here three years, I've got six the nine hundred dollars worth of tickets in front of my house, as well as my daughter 2400, and nowhere else in the city.
Why is that?
Now you told my car because I'm up for uh this towing eligibility.
I've lost my vehicle.
My vehicle's gone.
I don't have 690.
They've already taken one of my cars, forced me to get emergency hearing with the magistrate up at Eastmont.
I had to appeal to the logic and the goodness of what's right to that magistrate for her to offer me an amnesty program that is apparently here, where I have to give up the car, and the tickets go away.
Alright, so I lost one car that way.
Now I have another car.
My daughter lives with me.
Fixed income combat veteran.
Everybody lives in my building is section eight and this and that.
The poorest among us, and we have ticket people, like with attitudes, ticketing us every day.
We can't come down every two hours.
And this needs to stop because I've I've complained over a year and a half now.
First time I've come to this part, and I need answers and I need this to go away because I need my car.
So that's what I have at this time, but I'd like to speak.
Are you in the room?
Can you can you connect with the gentleman and help him connect to the parking division and council member Fife's office?
Thank you.
Don't go for addressing.
We have throughout the city uh city trash cans.
These trash cans have been now been identified as places to put illegal dumping.
So besides the the can being used, the individuals are putting uh pieces of furniture and other illegal dumping at those sites.
And near my spot, which is Keller and Mountain, they had to remove the city trash can in order to uh discourage the misuse.
I'm also concerned about the continued effort to get Mr.
Art Shanks' renaming of the streets uh as indicated by city ordinance actually happening.
I'm also uh hoping that the encampment policy, the area of the policy that I'm really concerned about is this new dynamic of people who are homeless and camping in front of people's homes, and in front of their homes, you have uh human waste, uh complete uh lack of accessibility to the sidewalk and misuse of the property.
Uh parking in this garage is a phenomenal effort because it's not enough parking.
Sometimes, a lot of times they have to close the garage down, but they are compact spaces that are being used with large vehicles, which limit sometimes I can't even get in my car because the space is so confined, and we need to do something about that.
Uh uh biking lanes throughout the assist city protective lanes, non-protective lane, how that's determined.
The double parking in Chinatown is never addressed.
The late merit parking with the flexibility of schedules, how is that working?
Uh could you put my mic on because he said I can speak?
Thank you.
We are now concentrating on developments, housing developments with no parking.
Uh the example is High Street in MacArthur, uh, a very good housing space, but little or no parking, and it's being recommended that the former Walgreens on uh high become a new developer with no parking, and this no parking is gonna create tremendous issues.
We need to address that.
Thank you.
That concludes your public speakers for it, too.
Alright, do we have anything from staff or other council members for the pending list?
Councilmember Guy.
Okay, thank you.
Yes, um, what what I'd like to do is have our our uh directors of public works uh bring back the item of uh uh replacing or or um having more vehicles available for our employees to do the work.
I know that they've come here before asking for more support, financial support to buy more trucks and other service vehicles, and I like to see that item come back to see what the city can do to make sure that our employees have the opportunity and this and the tools necessary to get the work done.
And um, I know we have an item about mechanics repairing vehicles, but if you go down to the public works yard on uh Coliseum Way or an Edgewater, you're going to see many old old vehicles from police vehicles and city vehicles that need to be repaired or replaced.
And I like to see that item come back to the council.
Thank you.
Please bring that through rules committee and schedule it if you'd like a report.
Thank you.
Um, yeah, I would like to also have something scheduled just on illegal dumping.
I I think we've had some good conversations in closed session, but I also think depending on what our director of public works is uh willing to share.
I think there's some important things that we've learned that the public also deserves to know, and some recent reporting too.
So, all right.
Uh, please bring that through the rules committee if you'd like an official report.
Thank you.
Do we have a motion to move the pending list?
Second.
Thank you, Rebra.
Motion made by Councilmember Gallo.
Seconded by Councilmember Wong to accept the termination and schedule outstanding committee items as is on roll.
Councilmember Guyo.
I will I will let you in the queue.
Thank you.
Councilmember Houston.
Aye.
And Councilmember Wong?
Aye.
And Chair Unger.
Aye.
The motion passes with four eyes to accept the termination of scheduled outstanding committee items as is.
Moving to item three.
Adopt a resolution awarding a contract to the WW Williams Company LLC to the sole responsive and responsible offer obtained by the open market per OMC to 04050J, the formal calls for the bid specific specification number 2592800 to provide Allison transmission, parts and repairs and amount not to exceed $750,000 per year for a five-year term.
Number 1525 to November 15, 2030, to the total amount not to exceed 3,750,000 over a five-year term, and to waiving the local and small local business enterprise program utilization requirement, and three, making appropriate California Environmental Quality Act findings, and you do have one speaker for this item.
All right, why don't we hear from uh our public speaker first?
Moving to our public.
If you're not ready, we can hear from staff first.
Okay, let's hear from staff first.
Thank you, Chair Unger, Council members, Richard Battersby, Assistant Director of Oakland Public Works.
Before you today, we have a request to approve a contract with WW Williams in the amount of $750,000 for five years, not to exceed $3,750,000, and to waive the local business, local small business enterprise program utilization requirement.
WW Williams performs repair and maintenance and parts sourcing for Allison heavy duty transmissions.
This is a specialized component.
It's pretty much the standard in the industry for heavy-duty vehicles, including fire apparatuses.
And we have about a hundred vehicles in the city fleet that use these Allison transmissions.
We're frequently forced to outsource repairs because we don't have the internal capacity or we may lack the expertise to perform these specialized repairs on transmissions.
And lately the equipment services is running about 60% staffing.
So we've been seeing an increase in outsourcing due to just simply not having the individuals on the shop floor to perform it.
We've uh requested a contract in the amount of $750,000.
We don't expect to hit that uh cap, but we wanted to request extra funding, so we would not have to come back to council to increase the contract if we did exceed a lower capacity, and then we had pending repairs, emergency repairs to fire apparatuses.
We made extensive outreach efforts uh to get local small business participation.
In addition to the standard advertising venues.
We reached out specifically to four local and seven non-local uh vendors that we thought would be interested in bidding on the RFQ.
We didn't get any responses to the initial RFQ, but then the buyer went out and directly negotiated.
We did get one responsive bid, and that was WW Williams.
They are somewhat local, they're located in Hayward, which is good.
We'd love to have uh an Oakland-based vendor provide these services, but despite our best efforts, we were unsuccessful.
So we are here uh to request approval of this contract as a uh necessary function to keep the city's fleet operational and on the fleet, including fire apparatuses, and I'm here available for any questions, Councilmember Houston.
Good morning, good morning to the chair.
Nice talking to you in the elevator about the weather.
Um, question.
Is this their first time getting the contract?
And if so, who do we use prior to this?
Just ask answer that question first through the chair.
Sure.
Uh through the chair, I'm not a hundred percent certain.
I believe we've used this vendor previously, but I'd have to confirm that and get back to you.
Okay, yeah, I need to know those type of um questions because um if they've had this contract, and this is for five years, correct?
Through the chair, that's correct.
Okay, whoever had it prior, and you said we haven't been able to find anyone that has the capacity, and what triggers me is when we always waive in this small local business.
Why don't we build the capacity?
I mean, if somebody had this, have we ever okay?
I'm asked another through a question through the chair.
How long have we been needing this service?
Through the chair.
Uh I've been here 11 years.
Allison transmission's been the industry standard, but 30 years I've been in the industry, so I suspect the need's been there for 30 years, and there may be some um proprietary aspects that uh as far as parts and being a servicing uh dealer or vendor, but I'm looking at the list of uh companies that we reached out to that doesn't appear to be uh a dealership or licensing issue.
Okay, through the chair, and this is where um it's called building capacity, and this is not to you, this is just open to everyone.
It's called building capacity.
When I was on the other side, and this is through the chair and the whole everyone in here, when I was on the other side as just a regular person before I was elected, 25 years ago, we've been saying the same thing.
The same thing.
We don't have the contractors, we don't have the skill sets.
When is enough enough?
It it it it disturbs me, it troubles me.
When I have children in the street that could build skill sets that need embracement that need fatherless like I was, right?
That need those individuals or need those skill sets.
Thirty years we've been going outside and not building the capacity, and this is not to you, this is to the whole city of Oakland, this is to the machine.
We gotta stop waving.
Why do we have it?
Small local if we're gonna continue to wave it.
It makes no sense.
And my cousin Daryl Carrie that passed away.
He said, if you're not angry now, when will you get angry?
I am angry.
So I'm gonna say this is not to you, it's not to you.
I just have to express it, put it on the record, because I'm gonna take it to higher level, to a very higher level because I'm tired of my Latino brothers and sisters dying.
I'm tired of my black brothers and sisters dying on the street when we're sending millions of millions of dollars outside of our city to Hayward to Concord, to Chicago.
So, in closing, thank you for your service.
I just had to share that and put it on the record.
If I may, through the chair.
Uh Councilmember Houston, I couldn't agree with you more.
Um, I wish there was more I could do in my role to expand and increase uh small business participation skills training in this particular aspect in our industry.
I think the local small business is applicable for larger projects, construction, some of the maintenance and repair around facilities where you might sub out a crew, but it's very unusual in the automotive repair industry to have that sub opportunity that would allow us to bring in more participation from local small business.
I would point out that something like Allison transmission repair requires a significant investment, not just for inventory and training and all that, but the heavy duty vehicles that these Allison transmissions are in require a larger repair facility.
And unfortunately, the nature of the industry has been such that with the property values going up, these larger automotive and vehicle repair facilities end up being utilized for other sources or other uh activities.
So we're seeing a dwindling amount of vendors that can provide the service and a high cost to buy in to get into the industry.
But if there's anything that the city can do, I mean we're happy to do it.
We try to uh train youth, we try to bring up uh service workers, the technicians to learn how to work on these things.
Um, and I would, as much as I hate losing staff, I would love to see some of our employees go out into Oakland and start this local small business.
So, Councilmember Houston, let's work together.
If you have ideas, if I have an idea, let's let's continue this outside of the public works and transportation committee.
Councilmember Houston, you continuing?
Can we switch the mic so he can continue?
Oh, okay.
I thought I think you were gonna follow up.
Okay.
So I'm you know, I understand what you're saying, but it's not about what you say, it's what you do.
All right.
Look, look, Oakland's been going through many challenges.
We sit here talking, playing.
At the end of the day, it's up to this council.
Alright, you've been in the cleaning business for years, you've seen it, you're still doing it.
You're just still short.
That's right.
I mean, you get large contracts from the state and the city and all that other stuff.
Okay, you've been at this for a while, but what I'm trying to, it's an example.
Public works has been here a number of times asking for more vehicles to get the work done in the neighborhood.
And the reality is we had budgeted 10 mechanics, but they were never hired previously and the previous years.
And we're short of mechanics because, you know, I know some of the mechanics, and they're retiring, they're getting out of Oakland.
They're leaving like the police, they're leaving Oakland, so forth.
So he's short of mechanics.
Go buy and visit his yard and it's water.
You're gonna see all the vehicles sitting there that need to be serviced and replaced, right?
From the police to the fire to public works, then you go to the Coliseum at the other end that I see daily, trucks have been sitting there for a long time that we can be using to have a clean city.
So the bottom line for me is that the administration and this council, we need to be able to award the contract to get the vehicles repaired.
Otherwise, we're gonna be sitting here complaining every day about well, the trash didn't get picked up.
Somebody's camped in front of my house.
Nobody comes to see it.
And then I got homeless from San Jose and San Francisco coming in by the roads.
I see them every morning.
And yet, where's Oakland at?
Well, we're talking to each other complaining.
Alright, and you see it, I mean, look at the I'm on top of Caltrans right now, but but the bottom line, we I'm gonna make a motion to support this item.
We need to get those vehicles repaired so our employees can get out there and do the job that they were hired to do.
Because certainly uh, you know, we can work on the longer scope in terms of identifying other local um vendors that can provide the service.
But right now we have an emergency in this city, and we need to get the the city back in an order like it used to be growing up here in Oakland that we can attract people and uh support our children and families because right now that's becoming a norm.
Our kids grew up seeing that trash on the street in front of them.
It's a norm.
That's all it's like when I grew up here killing each other became a norm.
Oh, you didn't kill each other 150 this year?
Oh, what happened?
And so it was to for us, it's a norm having 140 plus mortars every year.
And growing up here in Oakland and East Oakland, so I think you know, we need to get the vehicles repaired back on the street, get the job done, make sure that this city's an attractive location, and uh so I make a motion to support Bruce Tess recommendation to get our vehicles repairs so we can use them.
If not, they're just sitting in the yard waiting for someone to get it done.
Thank you.
Make thank you.
So I do agree.
We just we need to get the work done.
Um I want to thank Councilmember Guyer for showing me around that yard uh a couple months ago.
Um, I think my question is if we approve this, should we see actually an increase in service delivery from the public works department, or is this maintaining the level of service we have now?
Yeah, through the chair, this is just to maintain the current level of service.
If the contract's not approved, you can expect the service to actually decline until we find another option.
So, how do we improve things?
What are your thoughts on that?
Through the chair, uh, first thing we do is uh fill the vacancies, uh the actual uh folks that do the work, the technicians, mechanics, and service workers.
Uh, the second thing is probably a longer term strategy, but it's equally as important.
We have to start decreasing the age of the city fleet, and the only way we can do that is through regular replacements since July 2023 when fleet replacement was decentralized, we've only purchased five replacement vehicles, and four of those were through the sewer division, which is an enterprise fund.
So the existing vehicles are getting older, they're breaking down more frequently, and we're finding that parts are becoming unavailable.
We've got over 12 Ford Crown Victoria's uh in OPD active use patrol vehicles.
That Crown Victoria platform was discontinued in 2013.
We're having difficulty finding parts, so we need to make a decision now to regularly replace these vehicles as they age, or this problem will continue to get worse even if we fill every vacant mechanic position.
Okay, thank you for articulating that.
And then around the specific contract, um, do you from your perspective?
Why did we only get one bidder for this?
Uh, through the chair, we get a variety of reasons um from vendors.
Um the city's has a reputation for being slow to pay.
Uh registering to do business with the city is sometimes an onerous undertaking, especially for small businesses.
Um lately, we've been hearing from vendors that the insurance requirements are much more stringent in Oakland than they are with other municipalities they do business for.
And frankly, um the maybe the most important factor is vendors have a choice now.
Um, they pretty much have all the work that they can manage, so they can pick and choose who their customers are.
So municipalities, it's not just Oakland.
Municipalities end up lower on the list because private industry uh pays better and they turn around.
They they need the vehicles turned around uh immediately.
I'm thinking like EPS, FedEx, we compete with them for external vendors, and we're having a tough time as are other municipalities.
Okay, understood.
Um, my concern when we have only one vendor is are we holding how are we holding this vendor uh if we do move forward with this to account like do we have like a performance standard that we're expecting of them, like this many vehicles are gonna get repaired?
Like, like do we have uh do we have it written out that what the expectations are?
Yeah, uh through the chair, we don't have that type of performance metric.
Um we do monitor vehicles as they're out of service and we keep track how long they're at the vendors, and we do try to encourage them to turn around vehicles quickly.
And just to clarify, this this although this vendor specializes in transmission repair, specifically Allison transmission, we have multiple other vendors that we can send heavy equipment to who perhaps can perform work on Allison, but it's not their primary specialty.
So we have other vendors that we can rely on.
These these uh WW Williams won't be the only vendor that we're sending heavy duty vehicles to, but they will probably be our primary Allison transmission related uh repair or maintenance vendor.
Okay, I I would just um request, if I may, that we we find ways to just because this is taxpayer money that we're holding our contractors accountable to to performance standards and but otherwise I I second the motion because um as well stating we need to get the work done, council member Houston.
Yes, uh I'm not sure if my my statement got misunderstood or not, but I wasn't stating that we're trying to hold back this contract.
What I'm stating is that we have to add certain things and elements to contracts like mentorship if we had mentorship 30 years ago with individuals knowing how to fix these transmissions and this equipment, exactly what council member Noel Gayo said was those individuals could be in the yard fixing them now.
That's what I'm saying, right?
And when we talk about uh mentoring individuals, yes, I mentored individuals.
I mentored uh the young man that has a million dollar contracts with the city that now with plumbing, doing plumbing, that's mentoring other individuals.
I mentored a guy that was six years old.
Now he has a contract, he's 30 something years old now, has contracts with Oakland Unified School District, did part of Fremont High, right?
So I know it can be done from my personal experience, and I'm not saying that we not not to actually um give this individual this company the contract.
What I'm saying is let's think outside the box.
Let's think long range.
What in that contract says that they they can mentor some young men or young women in our city?
So five years from now, they can fix those vehicles in the yard that Councilmember Noel just spoke about, and Councilmember Wang spoke about where they don't have to go outside, or some of them can be repaired.
I'm talking about long range, think long range, and this is not to you, this is just for the record, right?
We have to give back to the city that we work for, right?
And that's all that I like to share, so thank you.
Okay, we've got a motion and a second.
Let's go to our public speaker, unless anyone else has anything calling in our public speaker for item three, Ms.
Related specifically to this item.
Uh did anybody ask for the source of funding for this?
You have to ask that question.
This is a couple of million dollars.
Related to uh the 700,000 per year estimate, how many vehicles would be covered under that 700?
How many transmissions could be repaired?
And is that sufficient to actually cover what potentially has been the need for repairs?
So are we dealing with partial repair uh or totally dealing with everything?
Now, related to the discussion you just had, you need to get with OUSD.
Discussion Breakdown
Summary
Oakland City/County/Port Public Safety & Oversight Meetings – October 28, 2025
The transcript covers multiple Oakland-area public meetings and civic segments, anchored by a large community press event and later city/port commission and council committee hearings. A major throughline was how Oakland institutions should respond to heightened immigration enforcement fears while maintaining public safety, privacy, and core services (education/Head Start, public works operations). Speakers repeatedly urged calm, peaceful protest, and use of verified legal resources; later meetings showed sharp disagreement over surveillance technology (Flock cameras) and data-sharing risks.
Public Safety & Sanctuary City Press Event (Immigrant Rights)
- Rev. Dr. Jacqueline Thompson (Allen Temple Baptist Church) framed the moment as a moral responsibility to stand in solidarity; urged unity and calm.
- Mayor Barbara Lee stated Oakland remains a welcoming city; OPD “does not and will not assist” ICE; emphasized peaceful protest, not “taking the bait,” and announced continued support resources including the Stand Together Bay Area Fund.
- Alameda County DA Ursula Jones Dixon said the DA’s office does not assist ICE, but cannot obstruct a legal warrant; emphasized victims/witnesses must feel safe coming to court; urged peaceful protest and avoiding engagement that could be used to “make an example” of Oakland.
- OPD Assistant Chief James Beer reiterated OPD will not enforce civil immigration matters, will not ask immigration status, and warned residents to request credentials; advised calling 911 if someone attempts entry/detention without proper identification.
- OUSD Superintendent Denise Sadler reaffirmed Oakland as a sanctuary district; opposed outside agents intimidating families; stated schools are places of safety.
- Congresswoman Lateefah Simon condemned federal actions as not about public safety; highlighted the federal shutdown; called for consistent rights information and nonviolent protest.
- State Senators Jesse Arreguín and Aisha Wahab cited California’s legal preparation, including millions in legal defense funding and “over 40 lawsuits” filed; stated the state is prepared to sue if military deployment occurs; urged peaceful protest and warned against “Trump’s trap.”
- Assemblymember Mia Bonta described community anxiety; urged unity and cautioned against chaos; described rapid coordination after reports of federal activity near Coast Guard Island.
- Alameda County Supervisor Nikki Fortunato Bass promoted organizing, knowing rights, using a rapid-response hotline, and family safety plans; cited a push for $10 million for food security due to shutdown impacts.
- Lourdes Martinez (Centro Legal de la Raza / Alameda County CLIP) described the rapid-response network and urged verification of ICE sightings; provided hotline 510-241-4011 and rights/safety planning guidance.
- SEIU 1021 (Antoinette/Antoine Blue) expressed opposition to federal overreach targeting Black and brown communities; urged residents to “pick a lane” and engage in civic action.
- API Legal Outreach (Nancy Wong) offered free removal-defense and rights education; urged peaceful protest and broader community support; distributed “red cards.”
- Councilmembers Charlene Wong and Zach Unger expressed solidarity; called federal actions racial profiling/white supremacy; urged policy work to protect residents.
- Oakland business community (Barbara Leslie and chamber leaders) expressed solidarity with immigrant business owners and support for peaceful advocacy.
- Faith leader Pastor Michael McBride strongly condemned federal overreach; warned that Black residents can also be targeted; announced “Secure the Town initiative”; urged youth to avoid engagement with federal officers and to know rights.
Public Comments & Testimony (Key Positions)
- Multiple speakers (public officials, educators, labor, legal orgs) expressed support for sanctuary policies, legal defense funding, and rapid-response verification.
- Multiple speakers urged peaceful protest and cautioned against provocation.
- Legal advocates emphasized knowing rights, not opening doors, and calling verified hotlines rather than spreading unverified reports.
Port of Oakland Audit Committee (Financial/Compliance Audits)
- Staff presented FY2024 compliance audits (single audit, passenger facility charge, customer facility charge) and deferred compensation plan audit.
- Key point: reports were described as clean audits with no findings; auditors outlined FY2025 audit plan and new GASB standards.
Oakland Privacy Advisory Commission (Surveillance Technology & Data Concerns)
- Open forum:
- One speaker argued the rent registry stores sensitive personal information and could be leveraged by ICE; urged remediation.
- Another speaker argued license plate readers do not capture biometrics and warned against “exploiting immigrants” to remove safety tools.
- CrimeTracer annual report discussion (OPD)
- OPD described CrimeTracer as a searchable system for reports/records; stated ICE/CBP cannot access Oakland data unless OPD grants access.
- Commissioners and public raised concerns about auditability, proxy access via federal agencies, and the possibility of indirect sharing.
- Commission requested follow-up on whether data types listed are exhaustive and on opt-out implications.
- Community Safety Camera Systems / Flock policy debate
- OPD presented changes including shortening retention to 30 days (from 90) and described contractual additions (data protection, termination clauses, “morality clause,” and suspension if federal assumption occurs).
- Public testimony sharply split:
- Opposition position: speakers argued Flock enables mass surveillance, is vulnerable to misuse and federal access, and threatens immigrants, reproductive/gender-affirming care seekers, and political dissidents; urged rejecting/ending Flock contracts.
- Support position: business and neighborhood representatives argued cameras aid investigations and deter crime; stressed non-facial-recognition design and urgent public safety needs.
- Commission deliberated that the vendor (Flock) posed unacceptable risk and that adequate guardrails could not be ensured.
- Vote outcome: Commission voted to recommend rejection of the proposed OPD use policy for the community safety camera system (motion passed with a split vote including abstention and “no” votes, as recorded).
Life Enrichment Committee (Head Start & Childcare)
- Approved amendments and grant actions supporting:
- Child Care Careers LLC substitute staffing contract increase (additional $500,000, total not to exceed $1,250,000) to maintain classroom ratios and avoid closures.
- Acceptance/appropriation of $13,797,057 in Head Start/Early Head Start funding and associated allocations/match.
- Public commenters raised workforce and leadership concerns (staff morale, vacancies, attrition, and equity in enrollment).
Public Works & Transportation Committee (Fleet/Repairs)
- Considered contract with WW Williams Company LLC for Allison transmission parts/repairs ($750,000/year, 5 years, total $3.75M), with waiver of local small business requirements.
- Councilmembers emphasized need to keep city fleet operational; public comment questioned funding source and how many repairs the amount covers.
Key Outcomes
- Immigrant-rights press event: officials reiterated non-cooperation policies with ICE, promoted verified rapid-response resources, and urged peaceful protest.
- Resource highlighted: Alameda County CLIP hotline 510-241-4011 and city alerts via Oaklandca.gov.
- Port of Oakland audit meeting: FY2024 audits reported as clean/no findings; FY2025 audit plan presented.
- Privacy Advisory Commission:
- Requested additional follow-up information on CrimeTracer data categories and opt-out mechanics.
- Voted to recommend rejection of OPD’s proposed community safety camera/Flock-related use policy, stating adequate guardrails could not be ensured.
- Life Enrichment Committee: advanced substitute staffing contract amendment and Head Start grant acceptance to full council (votes recorded as unanimous in committee).
- Public Works & Transportation Committee: advanced vehicle transmission repair contract item discussion (action/vote not fully captured in the provided excerpt).
Meeting Transcript
Humorseobia la media con la conición, la visiones, la conocía, la convención, la conocía de la visita de la Well, we're not going to be able to do that. I am Reverend Dr. Jacqueline Thompson. I'm the senior pastor of Allen Temple Baptist Church, and it is my honor, my privilege, but moreover, my moral responsibility to stand before you this morning. We gather here this morning, not out of fear, but in faith, faith in one another, faith in our community, and faith in the values that make Oakland the resilient, compassionate, I will add justice loving city that many of us have come to know and love. And so in these times of uncertainty, we don't turn away from our neighbors. This is who we are, and this is who we have always been. And it must be made clear that this is who we will continue to be. Today you will hear from leaders all across every sector of our community, from city hall to our classrooms, from labor unions to our legal advocates, from business to community, and of course, from the faith community as well. All of those who stand on the front lines doing work on behalf of protecting our residents. Each voice you will hear today represents thousands more standing in solidarity. So we are unwavering in our commitment to send a clear message. And now, of course, it is my pleasure to introduce a leader who needs no introduction, but we are blessed because she has dedicated her life to fighting for justice and equality and dignity for every person. Please help me welcome the honorable mayor of Oakland, Barbara Lee. Thank you so much, Pastor Jackie, my pastor, and I want to thank first our Allen Temple Baptist Church family for once again bringing us together and helping us navigate this very serious moment here in our community. And I want to thank everyone here, our local, county, state partners, community leaders, our neighbors, everyone who continued to stand up for Oakland's immigrant rights. And I think Pastor Jackie framed this message exactly what we're here about today. And I want to thank the press for being here also and for listening and covering the fact that we're united front, first of all, elected officials, faith leaders, community partners, all of us delivering action over anxiety, and protection over fear, as our democracy faces new tests. Now, recent uh news reports, and I think you all have seen that uh in San Francisco, Mayor Lurie received a call from Donald Trump indicating that uh San Francisco is no longer on his list. That does not mean we are not prepared, we have no idea. This is very fluid, and so there's no information we can bring to you today to bring you up to date on what plans they have in place, but we are moving forward with our plans and we are prepared. Uh, the federal administration, of course, has escalated its rhetoric and its enforcement posture in the Bay Area. We know that border patrol agents are being stationed on Coast Guard Island. But let me be clear. Our city, as I said, we are fully prepared. We're monitoring developments closely and will keep our residents informed if there are any confirmed changes. Oakland is and will continue to be a welcoming city for our immigrants and our refugees, and our laws and values reflect that. The Oakland Police Department does not and will not assist with immigration and customs enforcement. That policy stands firm, and our assistant chief will outline exactly how we are upholding it under tremendous pressure. Oakland police officers, of course, will protect Oaklanders' First Amendment's rights. However, we are a city which has always been a peaceful city, and we want to make sure that we don't take the bait and that violent behavior toward anyone, police officers, people, individuals-that's not tolerated in Oakland. We stand with our immigrant community and with our neighbors no matter your status, and we are coordinating with our local and regional partners to provide support and legal resources. These federal actions are not about public safety as they try to uh pretend that's what they're doing. Uh, their political stunts designed to divide and to intimidate. Oakland will not take the bait. We will remain calm, focused, and united. And we all know that crime is down. Oakland is rebuilding, rising, and on the move. We will not allow outsiders to create chaos or exploit our city. Peaceful protest is the cornerstone of who we are. We will support and protect residents' right, First Amendment rights to speak, to march, and to organize peacefully and safely. We ask everyone to stay calm, stay informed, and stand together. Do not let ICE or anyone else provoke disorder in our community. We know that this moment is painful and triggering for many families. The trauma is real, but we are responding not with fear, but with collaboration, courage, and care. So together with our partners, of course, uh last month we launched the Stand Together Bay Area Fund to support families impacted by aggressive immigration enforcement. In Oakland, we will show strength through our compassion through our justice framework and lens and through equity. So the progress, of course, in Oakland is ongoing and it belongs to us, our city, not to outside forces. We will protect it and we will protect one another. We will not let anyone bring or wreak havoc or turmoil in our city.