Oakland City Council Special Meeting – March 16, 2026: Consent Agenda Approvals and Policy Discussions
Oakland City Council Special Concurrent Meeting – March 16, 2026
The Special Concurrent Meeting of the Oakland Redevelopment Successor Agency/City Council convened at 3:32 PM in the City Council Chamber. The meeting adjourned at 4:47 PM after approving a 24-item consent agenda, hearing public testimony, and conducting councilmember announcements. Councilmember Carroll Fife was excused at roll call but arrived at 3:45 PM; all eight members were present for the final vote. The meeting was adjourned in memory of Derbing Alvarado and Latetia Bobo.
Consent Calendar
- All 24 consent items were approved unanimously (8‑0) on a motion by Councilmember Fife, seconded by Councilmember Houston. Key items included:
- Renewal of local emergency declarations for HIV/AIDS (Resolution 91080 C.M.S.), medical cannabis health emergency (91081 C.M.S.), and homelessness (91082 C.M.S.).
- Final passage of two planning code ordinances: (1) Amendments to Chapter 17.96 S‑14 Housing Sites Combining Zone (Ordinance 13874 C.M.S.), and (2) Senate Bill 79 Planning Code Implementation Ordinance (Ordinance 13875 C.M.S.).
- Resolutions affirming Oakland's commitment to gender‑affirming care (91083 C.M.S.), recognizing March 20 as International Day of Happiness (91084 C.M.S.), supporting California Senate Bill 959 on wildfire class cancellations (91086 C.M.S.), and supporting H.R. 5356 – the National Infrastructure Bank Act of 2025 (91087 C.M.S.).
- Travel reimbursement for Council President Jenkins, his Deputy Chief of Staff, and Deputy Policy Analyst to Councilmember Unger for federal advocacy in Philadelphia, up to $2,500 per person (91088 C.M.S.).
- Grants and contracts: Head Start grant application for FY 2026‑2031 ($13.8 million); Oakland Alameda Access Project Delegated Maintenance Agreement amendment; Affordable Housing and Sustainable Communities program funds (Liberation Park – $44.7 million; 285 12th Street – $35.9 million); Lead Hazard Reduction Grant Program ($4.4 million); Prohousing Incentive Pilot Program grant ($1.6 million); American Building Service janitorial contract amendment (new total $1 million); Atthowe Fine Arts storage contract ($300,000); Innovative Interfaces library system renewal ($2 million); HHAP‑6, Winter Relief, and OPRI funding packages ($23 million state, $441,350 county, $4.2 million housing authority); OPD Cadet Program funding ($900,000); and two legal settlements ($100,000 for O'Neill/Paige and $250,000 for Hagos).
- Informational report on HCD Anti‑Displacement Strategic Action Plan (received and filed).
Public Comments & Testimony
Twenty‑three speakers addressed the consent calendar and open forum. Key themes:
- Gender‑affirming care (Item 6.6): More than a dozen speakers from Families United for Trans Rights, Rainbow Families Action, and individual Oakland residents expressed strong support for Resolution 91083. Speakers described the critical need for transgender, gender‑nonconforming, intersex, and two‑spirit (TGNCI2S) residents to maintain access to necessary healthcare, and praised the Council for affirming these rights in the face of federal hostility.
- Anti‑displacement and housing conditions (Item 6.16): Several residents of Oakland Station (a senior housing complex) and members of ACE (Alliance of Californians for Community Empowerment) testified about unsafe living conditions—lack of heat, broken elevators, pests, inadequate security—and called for a proactive rental inspection program to shift enforcement burden from tenants to landlords.
- National Infrastructure Bank (Item 6.10): Two speakers supported H.R. 5356, emphasizing its potential to fund affordable housing, transportation, and infrastructure without new taxes.
- Illegal cannabis operations and code enforcement: Councilmembers Gallo and Houston raised concerns about unpermitted cannabis facilities in their districts, while Gallo also noted lead paint hazards found in City Hall offices.
- Sales tax and measure AA spending: A speaker criticized the proposed sales tax measure and questioned oversight of Measure AA (Oakland Children's Fund) spending.
Discussion Items
- Item 6.21 (HHAP‑6, Winter Relief, OPRI): Councilmember Wang stated that her amendment—adding performance metrics for homelessness programs—was not being adopted at this meeting; instead, staff will develop a comprehensive set of metrics for the March 24 Life Enrichment Committee meeting. The Council adopted supplemental legislation 2, which corrected contract dates for East Oakland Community Project, BFWC, and Housing Consortium of the East Bay.
- Councilmember comments on consent items: Councilmember Gallo highlighted lead paint issues in City Hall and urged coordination between the fire department, permitting, and cannabis enforcement. Councilmember Houston expressed support for seniors at Oakland Station and noted efforts to relocate an encampment humanely. Councilmember Brown thanked speakers on the gender‑affirming care resolution and emphasized the need to protect vulnerable populations. Councilmember Fife urged equal attention to disparities facing Black Oaklanders and noted the work done on proactive rental enforcement.
Key Outcomes
- Consent Agenda approved 8‑0 (motion by Fife, second by Houston). All resolutions and ordinances on the consent calendar were adopted or approved for final passage.
- Gender‑affirming care resolution (6.6) adopted unanimously – reaffirms the right of TGNCI2S residents to obtain care without discrimination and demands healthcare providers and insurers comply with state and local laws.
- Item 6.21 adopted with corrected contract dates as reflected in supplemental legislation 2; performance metrics will be addressed at a future committee meeting.
- Anti‑displacement informational report (6.16) received and filed; councilmembers committed to visiting Oakland Station for a “reality tour” and working on proactive rental inspection.
- Meeting adjourned at 4:47 PM in memory of Derbing Alvarado and Latetia Bobo.
Meeting Transcript
Good afternoon and welcome to the special city council meeting of Monday, March 16th, 2026. Before I call roll, I will go over speaker card instructions. If you'd like to fill out a speaker's card on any item, please fill out a speaker's card before the item is called for discussion. You can do so by filling pulling a card at the front table and giving it to a clerk representative before the item is called, or two hours after the start of the meeting. This meeting was called to order at three thirty-two. So making that time five thirty-two is your last opportunity to turn in speaker cards or before the item is called for discussion, whichever one comes first. Councilmember Gaio. Here. If approved, this action will be final passage. Going to item 6.5, an ordinance regarding Senate Bill 79 Planning Code implementation ordinance. This item also will be final passage if approved. This afternoon. A resolution regarding International Day of Happiness. Item 6.8, a resolution for citywide cooperative agreements for fiscal years 26 through 27. Item 6.9, a resolution support of California Senate Bill 959. Item 6.10, a resolution in support of HR 5356. Item 6.11 is a resolution for travel reimbursements from the council contingency fund for travel to Philadelphia for federal advocacy. Item 6.13 a resolution regarding the Oakland Alameda Access Project. Delegated Maintenance Agreement Amendment. Item 6.14 includes multiple pieces of legislation regarding the affordable housing and sustainable communities program cycles eight and nine. A resolution for lead hazard reduction grant program. Item 6.16 an information report right regarding the HCD anti-displacement strategic action plan. Grant application round four. Item 6.18. A resolution for professional services agreement amendment with American Building Services Inc. Item 6.19, a resolution for adhofine art services contract. A resolution regarding innovation interfaces contract renewal. Item 6.21, a resolution regarding HAP winter relief and OPRI. Item 6.22, a resolution for OPD cadet program funding. Item 6.23, a resolution for Tom O'Neill, Mabel Page versus City of Oakland. Item 6.24, a resolution for a settlement for Phil Moshagos versus the City of Oakland. And that is your final consent item. And you do have speakers on this item. Councilmember. And then council member. Thank you. But secondly, I I want to bring that issue back to the council because I'm getting a good number of requests from the neighborhood where there are some cannabis operations, but they don't have the legal one, is the permits. Secondly, they don't have the waterproof situation that they need to have water protection or the water in case of an emergency. And also there's a good number of uh smoke shops throughout your district, specifically in mine, where they are providing uh the marijuana sales illegally, and uh we need to get that back in order in our neighborhoods uh and make sure that I want to do want to hear from the administration how many millions are we collecting annually because at one time they used to bring the millions of dollars cash in a bus and give them to the city, but we didn't know where it was being spent. So if you can give us a financial report, that would be great, and also do the follow-up with the fire department uh in terms of the inspections, so the operations and also with our department, our office to make sure that we are permitting, but we're doing legal permitting and checkups to that operation. Then the last one I'll bring up is this on this uh consent agenda is has to do with the lead hazard uh in our homes, and I'm the chairperson, the precedent of the lead hazard joint effort between the county and the city of Oakland. And uh we meet on a monthly basis, but the reality that's happening in my office this week last week. My chief assistant, Rosa and her little boy wound up with lead in the paint issue. Children's hospital reported the little boy with contamination. Then my assistant went for a checkup and she had a high contamination, and we removed some samples of the paint falling in our office at City Council, and they were tested, and they were tested at very high levels of lead in the paint issue. And I share that with you because I went to the county, and the county said, I'm sorry, we cannot help the city. Even though they have 9.5 million dollars to legally we sued and we have money for that money sitting in there not being used in our neighborhood, and they can assist us to do an inspection. I went to my city staff that we have five million dollars for years that we have not been using, and well, I'm sorry, but I can't help you. We've got to find an inspector. But the bottom line is I have the data, the documentations, the tests that are in front of us with that issue existing here as City Hall, and but I I asked the administration to please uh make and make sure that I get the inspector legally come and test our office to make sure that our city hall is a safe place to um to do business in because we didn't meet with your but your uh buildings department and other departments, but you know, I got one of those but but who's gonna pay for the inspector anyway.
openpublica.com