Pittsburgh City Council Budget Hearings: Department of Mobility and Infrastructure (2025-12-03)
Pittsburgh City Council Budget Hearings: Department of Mobility and Infrastructure (2025-12-03)
The Pittsburgh City Council Committee on Public Works and Infrastructure convened to review the 2025 accomplishments and 2026 budget request for the Department of Mobility and Infrastructure (DOMI). Department leadership provided a comprehensive overview of the department's four bureaus, highlighting a strong emphasis on bringing engineering, design, and construction work in-house to achieve significant cost savings and expedited project delivery. Key discussions focused on Vision Zero initiatives, bridge rehabilitation, the ongoing LED streetlight conversion, and the critical need for increased fiscal resources to secure matching funds for federal and state grants. Councilmembers expressed strong support for in-house capacity expansion while raising concerns regarding budget constraints, sidewalk maintenance policies, and the department's response to specific traffic engineering requests.
Consent Calendar
- Routine administrative approvals regarding departmental budget allocations for 2025 and proposed staffing additions for 2026 were noted for discussion but not explicitly listed as a separate unanimous vote in the transcript.
Public Comments & Testimony
- Councilwoman Lynn Gross: Expressed strong support for the shift toward in-house project delivery, noting it prevents years-long delays and cost inflation associated with outsourcing. She advocated for modernizing bridge construction materials, citing Chicago's use of steel mesh bridges as a potential faster and longer-lasting alternative to current concrete methods. She questioned the lack of a city-wide inventory of retaining wall conditions in digital format (Cartograph). She requested updates on the status of sidewalk and retaining wall maintenance in District 2, specifically regarding the $14 million Grandview stabilization project and landslide remediation on Herndon and McGardle streets.
- Councilman Sharland: Expressed deep concern regarding the city's inability to pursue grant funding due to a lack of matching funds, describing it as "leaving money on the table." He supported the need for a dedicated line item to facilitate 20% federal matches. He voiced strong support for the traffic calming and vulnerable road user safety improvements on South 18th and 21st Streets, and acknowledged the critical role of staff member Ian (referred to as Jan/Yon) in community relations. He queried the status of the Baldolf Street landslide project and why it received a low priority score, asking if funding could be found to prevent homelessness.
- Councilwoman Strasberger: Praised the department's work in District 2 and specifically thanked them for responding to landslide issues in the Herndon and Elliott neighborhoods. She supported the concept of integrating traffic calming with enforcement but expressed concern that infrastructure might slow down first responders and hinder elderly residents. She supported the push for a Vision Zero coordinator and asked about the possibility of using painted lines in areas without sidewalks to improve safety.
- Councilman Yaw: Expressed appreciation for the department's responsiveness despite staffing constraints. He emphasized the need to balance traffic calming requests with the safety needs of first responders and the elderly. He inquired about the integration of speed humps into the paving program and noted that traffic calming spending (approx. $575k-$1.6M) is a fraction of the paving budget ($19.5M). He supported the expansion of the traffic calming program but acknowledged the difficulty of meeting every request. He raised concerns about the timing of traffic lights at the West End Circle and supported the idea of a "sidewalk tax" to shift responsibility from property owners to the city.
- Waymo Inquiry: A councilmember (implied as Yaw or Strasberger) asked about the city's preparation for autonomous vehicle deployments by Waymo. DOMI planning staff noted they were not previously aware but confirmed they are now engaging with PennDOT and planning for public interaction, despite state preemption limiting local regulation.
Discussion Items
- In-House Capacity and Cost Savings: The department emphasized a strategic shift to in-house execution for planning, design, and construction to save money and time. Specific examples cited include saving over $400,000 on the South 21st streetscape design by avoiding consultants, saving roughly 95% on bridge washing ($2,300 in-house vs. $35,000 contractor), and saving $431,000 on the Calera Street Bridge #2 design.
- Vision Zero: The department reported 19 fatalities on non-interstate streets in 2025. They highlighted the deployment of automated red light enforcement and the creation of tailored education materials for motorcyclists. Speakers expressed a position that engineering alone cannot achieve Vision Zero; they require a comprehensive approach including policy, education, and enforcement.
- Grant Funding and Matching Funds: A recurring theme was the inability to secure grants due to lacking local matching funds (often 20%). Councilman Sharland and DOMI leadership discussed the necessity of a dedicated line item or policy change to allow the department to cover these matches, noting that grants often total millions (e.g., Warrington Ave, Murray Ave) and provide significant value.
- Litter and Public Works: Brief comments regarding litter were included in the transcript, with the Department of Public Works noting that litter begets more litter and calling for a holistic approach including infrastructure, education, and nonprofit partnerships.
- Infrastructure Specifics:
- Bridges: 19 bridges are in the pipeline (15 in poor condition), mostly federally funded. The Panther Hollow Bridge repair targets a 2026 reopening. The Charles Anderson Bridge construction is proceeding despite challenges.
- Streetlight Conversion: 40% of LED luminaries have been replaced, with completion projected by the end of 2026. The project includes an equity component in site selection.
- Traffic Signals: 80-100% of signal projects are funded by PennDOT. The department is working toward a Traffic Management Center to manage signals remotely.
- Sidewalks: The budget for critical sidewalk gaps is being cut in half for 2026 ($350k vs. $700k). DOMI proposed a new GIS tool developed with "Pittsburgh Walks" to inventory sidewalk conditions more accurately.
- BRT & NFL Draft: Staff are dedicated to managing the commercial street bridge detour and other logistics for the upcoming NFL Draft, with BRT construction in Oakland/Uptown scheduled for completion in 2026.
Key Outcomes
- Staffing Requests: The department requested funding for a full-time Vision Zero coordinator, an Infrastructure Engagement Performance Manager, a Press Officer, and two seasonal laborers for the bridge division in 2026.
- Budget Spending: DOMI spent $73 million in capital funds in 2025, with $19 million directed to paving and $13 million to slope mitigation (Mount Washington).
- Future Milestones (2026):
- Panther Hollow Bridge to reopen.
- Automated red light enforcement to be deployed.
- Traffic Management Center to go online.
- BRT Oakland/Uptown construction to conclude.
- Safe Streets for All grant planning to finalize.
- Legislative Streamlining: Council and DOMI agreed to revisit the process of aligning local agreements with PennDOT policies to reduce the number of legislative steps (currently ~80 per year) required for state-funded projects.
- Sidewalk Strategy: The department agreed to leverage the new GIS mapping tool and explore creative funding solutions, including potential policy shifts to reduce property owner liability, though no immediate budget change for city-funded sidewalk repairs was approved beyond the draft $350,000 allocation.
Meeting Transcript
Hello, and welcome to the Pittsburgh City Council budget hearings. Uh, my name is Councilmember Barb Warwick, and I chair the committee on public works and infrastructure. For this hearing, we will be hearing from the department of mobility and infrastructure. And I'd like to well, everybody's here at the table already. And uh so uh budget director, Peter McDevitt, if you'd like to give us a brief overview. Thank you, Councilmember. The mission of the Department of Mobility and Infrastructure is to provide the physical mobility necessary to enable the social and economic mobility of the people of Pittsburgh through the management, design, improvement, and operation of the public rights of way. We're going to get to all three of these functions in our slideshow, okay. It is sorry, I'm a little glitzier. We have four bureaus. We have administrative plan and policy and permitting, project design and delivery, traffic operations, and we have a total of 127 full-time positions. For 2025 accomplishments, this is for department wise. We had a dedicated communication staff. This the staff was very vital for delivering our projects. They were able to go out to community meetings, be able to have community participation and also work with council on our projects. Penn on SPC coordination. This is very vital since Domi's been a department. We started with about four or five projects that are federally and state funded. We're currently around 44 projects that are receiving federal and state funds. And the majority of this is because we have a great pend on SPC coordination. Public safety coordination. We show them the design, show them the impacts of the community, and we take their feedback seriously, and we have to um we hear we hear each other out. Um vision zero. Vision zero um really has become really robust in 2025. Um we have um a couple um different types of uh um committees that are now um attached to it, and it's really going well, and we're looking to see it through. I'm gonna hand it off to Angie Martinez. Yep. Um thank you, council, for having us. Um I always look forward actually to this budget presentation because it's a great opportunity for us to look back at our accomplishments. Um I think that's especially important for the Bureau I lead of planning policy and permits because so much of what we do is kind of behind the scenes, um, especially when I compare it to you know what my colleagues are doing, literally building bridges and uh our traffic signals. Um but it's through planning, through policy, uh standard procedures, guidelines, all things that you'll hear me talking about that our group oversees that we really get the opportunity to be able to scale up and deliver all aspects of Domi's mission because when we deliver predictable and consistent work, I believe we're providing the very best value to our residents and delivering our work in the best manner possible. Um before I jump into slides, um the executive team we're talking about, uh prepping for this presentation. One of the things we wanted to do was really put a spotlight on the our staff. Um it's because of the 120 some people that work for the department that we're able to achieve the work that we do. So we'll be talking not only about the work that we've done, but also about the staff that have um enabled us to be able to do it. So starting first with our planning bureau, um, this is an office of one supervisor and then three um staff planners. Um the thing that I want to highlight on this first slide is our in-house capability within our planning unit. So we have a team that is expert and qualified in being able to look at crash data, analyze it, review crash reports, um, do uh GIS uh analysis, and also do um design conceptual design drawings for projects. So because we have all of this great in-house capability, we're able to actually act as good planners um to our colleagues in traffic and streets division to help them better deliver the projects um that they oversee. So on this slide, you see some examples of the planning process that we uh ran for both South 18th Street and 21st Street. Those are projects that are gonna be delivered by other Domi bureaus, um, as well as uh some of the scoping that we did for both um traffic calming um installation projects and for the Lawrenceville Mobility Enhancement District. Next slide. Um this slide continues in some of the work that we started this year and that is going to continue into next year. Um, just very quickly, I want to highlight two projects of this list. Um the first is our South Nunville and Boundary Street Street Streetscape plan, excuse me. Um this is an example of a transportation planning process, I think, in its sort of church form. So this is a vital roadway uh mobility link in Oakland, and it's a road that isn't working well for anybody today. And unlike many streets in the city where we're working within a very constrained tight geography or cartway, we actually have space along boundary level to really reimagine that road and how it can work for all users for cars, for pedestrians. This road currently lacks sidewalks, so people are walking in their street, and even for cyclists because this road is also an extension of our trail network. So this planning process is very robust, and we're approaching it in anticipation of being able to seek grants to actually move into construction.
openpublica.com