Pittsburgh City Council Budget Hearing: 2026 Operating & Capital Budget Review (2025-12-10)
Pittsburgh City Council Budget Hearing: 2026 Operating & Capital Budget Review
This hearing featured the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) presenting the proposed 2026 operating and capital budgets to City Council. Director Jake Pollack and Chief Financial Officer Patrick Cornell defended the proposal as balanced and compliant with city financial criteria, despite a "narrow margin for error" driven by a debt service "cliff" and significant structural revenue challenges. Council members expressed concern over a reported $30 million deficit, particularly regarding overtime, utilities, and fleet funding, leading to a debate on whether the city must propose a tax increase or rely on deeper operational cuts to achieve solvency.
Consent Calendar
- No specific consent calendar items were discussed or voted on during this transcript segment; the meeting proceeded directly to budget deliberations.
Public Comments & Testimony
- No formal public comments or testimony from community members were recorded in this transcript segment.
Discussion Items
- Revenue Outlook and Common Level Ratio (CLR): Director Pollack explained that the city faces "artificially depressed" real estate tax revenue growth due to a court-ordered decline in the CLR, which has resulted in an estimated $20 million annual reduction in tax revenue compared to prior forecasts. He noted that this trend is unsustainable and that a resolution (reassessment or litigation) is expected before 2030, at which point revenue would stabilize. Council members identified this as a primary driver of the budget shortfall.
- Overtime and Premium Pay Variance: The core dispute centered on the "$20 million" gap in overtime costs. OMB officials argued that when offset against $16 million in savings from lower-than-budgeted regular wages and vacancy allowances, the net deficit is only approximately $3.2 million. Council members countered that using vacant positions to fund overtime is "shoddy record keeping" and not a sustainable long-term solution, with some members maintaining that the actual unfunded liability is closer to $20 million if vacancy savings are not counted.
- Utility Costs (Water and Electricity): Concerns were raised regarding rising costs for Pittsburgh Water (estimated at $10 million for 2025 and projected for 2026) and electricity. OMB explained that water costs are partially offset by "true-ups" from fees the city collects on behalf of the water authority, and that the 2026 budget of $8.5 million is adequate for the transition away from the true-up process. They also clarified that electricity costs for streetlights are partially covered by the Liquid Fuels Trust Fund, though reconciliation has not yet occurred for the current year.
- Fleet Funding: Councilmember Barb Warwick emphasized that public works and safety directors have stated the city needs $20 million annually for fleet maintenance (the "target"), whereas the proposed budget only includes $10 million (a $7.4 million increase from the prior year). OMB confirmed that the current proposal does not include full fleet funding and that doubling the allocation to $20 million would require additional revenue.
- Debt Service: The budget faces a "debt cliff" in 2026 due to balloon payments from 2020 COVID-related refinancing. While debt service is projected to drop significantly in 2027, 2026 operates with a surplus of under $2.5 million, leaving little room for error.
- Fleet and Capital Strategy: Council member Charland questioned the city's reliance on long-term bonds for short-term assets (like vehicles) versus the county's approach of shorter-term financing. OMB defended the long-term bond strategy, citing GFOA best practices and the risk of higher long-term debt service costs associated with shorter-term bonds, though they acknowledged the county's method is not illegal.
- Affordable Housing: Councilmember Wilson questioned the return on investment for the over $100 million spent on affordable housing via ARPA and bonds, arguing it did not improve the city's financial position. Director Pollack countered that the primary benefit is a public service (preventing displacement) rather than direct financial return.
Key Outcomes
- No Final Vote on Budget: The hearing concluded without a final vote, as Council President Laval moved to recess the hearing with the intention of keeping it open for potential further discussion or testimony.
- Confirmation of Negotiation Stance: Director Pollack stated the administration is open to discussing modifications to the budget to increase the "margin for error" (cushion) but explicitly declined to propose a new tax increase, maintaining that the current proposal is balanced if the $30 million deficit is rejected in favor of the $3.2 million net variance figure.
- Agreement on Future Discussions: OMB agreed to engage in a conversation with Council regarding potential amendments to address specific deficiencies (e.g., fleet, litter management, out-of-school-time programs) raised during the hearing, though they did not commit to submitting a revised budget document immediately.
- Operational Adjustments: OMB confirmed that 50 positions have been eliminated and $3.5 million in non-personnel spending has been cut to achieve the proposed balanced state, acknowledging these cuts impact operational capacity.
Meeting Transcript
Oh, I don't know. I don't know. Hello and welcome to the Pittsburgh City Council budget hearings. I am Councilwoman Erica Strasberger and I chair the committee on finance and law. For this hearing, we will hear from the Office of Management and Budget, including the Operating Budget Division, the Capital Budget Division, the C D BG Division, and the Procurement Division. And while we are awaiting other council members to joining us, I'll ask our budget director, Pete McDevitt to give a brief overview of the department. Thank you, Councilperson. The mission of the Office of Management and Budget is to ensure the effective and efficient use of available resources in order to sustain the delivery of quality services to the residents of the City of Pittsburgh. OMB is organized into the following core teams to strengthen citywide financial and grant management. There is the management division, capital and asset management, community development, operating, and special revenue and procurement. Most of that is moving uh three one one from the mayor's office to OMB. And a quick summary of non-personnel changes. Overall, there is a 281,578 decrease in non-personnel operating budget. Uh that includes a hundred and eleven thousand dollar decrease in professional and technical services. There's a three hundred and six thousand dollar increase in property services, uh and that's for the first vehicle target cost and increased land and building um due to the increases for deposits into the building improvement fund, BIF operating and capital accounts and increased two hundred ROS property maintenance, um a ninety-seven thousand dollar increase in other uh services for insurance premiums and a five hundred and seventy-five thousand dollar decrease in supplies. Uh and in the capital budget, uh OMB has a handful of capital projects. Those pretty much all flow through the community development team for C D B G uh dollars and ESG program, Hopla. And that's it for that. And uh for trust funds, OMB has the community development trust funds for for those C D B G dollars. Um and the bridge asset management program trust fund flows through OMB as felt as well as the facilities trust fund and the lead safety trust fund. That's all I have. Thank you. Pardon. Uh from members and directors of the department, can you please introduce yourselves and then proceed with your presentation? Jake Pollack, Deputy Mayor of the City of Pittsburgh and Director of the Office of Management and Budget. Patrick Cornell, Chief Financial Officer. David Hutchinson, Assistant Director for Capital and Asset Management. Kelly Russell, Assistant Director for Community Development. Thank you very much. And very quickly, we've been joined by Councilmember Barb Warwick. Thank you. Great. Thank you. Um thank you, Madam Chair and Council members, for um the opportunity to present. We're going to begin by uh providing an overall summary of the proposed uh 2026 uh operating and capital budgets as a whole, as you uh you know are aware the Office of Management and Budget um coordinates the process by which that budget is prepared and address some high-level topics and then uh from there flow into discussions of individual items that fall within the actual uh uh unit of OMB. Um and I would like to begin there by acknowledging the will of council that was adopted yesterday uh to uh call for further conversation between uh the administration and uh council as we work to conclude this year's budget process. Um the uh we we are happy to engage in a conversation with members and and council leadership uh around outstanding concerns that have been raised across council's budget hearings with individual departments over the last month uh in the hopes of reaching uh conclusion um that everyone finds satisfactory. Uh much of my presentation on the overall budget today will focus on areas that we believe are central areas of concern um based on the discussion at previous budget hearings and to address why uh it's the perspective of OMB that the uh issue that that the existing budget proposal um is balanced and meets the the needs of the city in 2026, understanding that there are concerns from council, just to provide that as a starting point for those discussions around the continuing areas of concern. Um so I'll start with looking at the five-year financial forecast. Um the uh first slide here presents the five-year revenue forecast. Um we are expecting a 680 million five hundred and twenty-seven thousand uh eight hundred and thirty-seven dollars in revenue in twenty twenty-six. That number is um uh very close to what we projected it would be a year ago, so we believe that um over the long haul our financial projections um in the forecast are are holding true. Uh the major trend to look at, and I think this is called out on a later slide is that uh year over year real estate tax revenue is declining, which is a unique uh situation for the city to be in, and um you know we'll be discussing how that factors into the proposal that we assembled. Looking at expenditures, we've uh proposed a 678 million 33,68, excuse me, dollar um expenditure for the year producing a surplus in 2026 of uh just under 2.5 million dollars. This slide also shows that um the three main criteria for uh a uh compliant budget, which is a positive operating result, a fund balance as a percent of expenditures of greater than 10 percent, and I'm sorry, of uh yes, of greater than 10 percent and debt service as a percent of expenditures at less than 12 percent is adhered to. We get very close to that debt service line in 2026. This is a known issue that we've been talking about for a number of years. 2026 is the year in which we pay off uh significant debt that was refinanced during the height of the COVID shutdown. So we've been anticipating high debt service in 2026 for uh you know nearly six years at this point as a city, and you'll see that number drops off dramatically beginning in 2027. So while we move close to that line, we we think that that is uh under those circumstances a comfortable position to be in.
openpublica.com