The Pittsburgh City Council Committee on Finance and Law convened for a budget hearing to review and vote on numerous operating and capital amendments, many of which were received by council members less than an hour prior to the meeting. The session focused on addressing significant fiscal gaps, proposed cuts to departmental budgets, and necessary funding for city services and infrastructure, with several council members expressing concern over the lack of transparency and time to review the complex proposals before casting votes.
Hello and welcome to the Pittsburgh City Council budget hearing for the line item vote. I'm Councilperson Erica Strasberger and I chair the committee on finance and law. And for this hearing, we will be going over all of the amendments that have been sent over by the mayor and council amendments to determine what amendments will be voted on during this Sunday special standing committees meeting. Councilperson. So each of you has a packet that has um amendments from I that's Councilperson Strasberger said the administration and from council members. Um the first uh the first page of the packet lists out the operating amendments sent over from the administration first, and then the capital amendments from the administration, and then the next page has the city council operating amendments, and uh the amendments proposed by council members for the capital budget will follow. So with that in in your packet, there's a number of of documents tabled together that kind of group those. Uh the first one is for the administration amendments. The first page is just kind of an overview of everything. Um, and then uh the details of the operating amendments and then the details of the capital amendments. And the next packet is the same exact thing, but for for the council sponsored amendments, uh, the first page is just an overview of each of them, and then the details for each individual one are in the the following pages of it. And then the last page you have is just the details for the capital budget amendments. And if you are ready. And so can it says on your summary to decrease the lifeguard allowance? Um to what is accurate? Yeah. Can you give us any details there? Because we have lived now the last five years, it's been quite the roller coaster with lifeguards and pools being able to open and close. So we want to make sure that we're not cutting that too closely, honestly, right? We don't want to make sure that we're not under budgeting for lifeguards because summer without your pool is a terrible thing. So I d the I mean the details may have been sent to me, but I am not um well-versed enough because this came from the administration, so unfortunately do not. We don't know why, or how do we have some? We do have Chief Cornell here to speak to any of the administration amendments. Just reassure us. I'm hoping. I'm hoping we are reassured. Patrick Cornell, Chief Financial Officer. I'm here to reassure you. Um so this was actually flagged to us by Director Vargas in the actual budget system in the Questica, the number was miskeyed. Uh what we typed in was 410974, and it is intended to be 241974. Uh and if you look at the outer years beyond that, it is that 240, 250,000 amount. Um, so it really is a correction uh from OMB. That is fantastic. I am reassured. That is thank you very much. That's exactly what I wanted to hear. Appreciate it. Thank you. Any further discussion on amendment one? All those in favor of administration operating amendment number one, please indicate by saying aye. Aye. Affirmative recommendation. Amendment number two. Number two, to update various vacancy allowances and shift those funds into various premium pay allocation. This is a budget neutral move in 2026 and over the five-year forecast. So this particular amendment, um uh council members, um, some some council members uh such as council president Lavelle and I would be happy to speak with you one-on-one about this, but at this time, this particular amendment is not recommended and could be taken up again on Sunday if we choose, but for now, it is not recommended, and I'm gonna instruct our budget uh director to move on to capital amendments. I'm sorry, so there was no motion on the there was no motion. We do not need to take a vote um necessarily if uh uh if um uh if we choose number two summary, which so does it or does it not have rows on the spreadsheets? It does, and the in the that's so that we flip over that page that has the yellow bar, it's all of those rows make up uh increased variances, uh uh vacancy allowances. Okay, and for our I'm sorry, I know I'm just kind of confused here, but for following along with the summary page, which is super helpful.