Pittsburgh City Council Budget Re-Opener Public Hearing - April 16, 2026
STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE
Pittsburgh City Council Budget Re-Opener Public Hearing - April 16, 2026
This was a public hearing on four budget-related resolutions (2026-0278, 2026-0279, 2026-0280, and 2026-0285) as part of the 2026 budget re-opener. The meeting featured testimony from three registered speakers, primarily focused on the proposed reduction to the city's Food Justice Fund. No council discussion followed the public comments, and the hearing was adjourned after all agenda items were reviewed.
Public Comments & Testimony
- Daniel McCarthy (Just Harvest organizer, Shady Side neighborhood): Urged council to protect and retain the full $500,000 originally allocated for the city's Food Justice Fund. He stated that one in five Pittsburgh residents are food insecure, and the city's Feed PGH report identified 23 healthy food priority areas, of which 18 are in predominantly Black neighborhoods. He noted that 33% of Black Pittsburghers live in a healthy food priority area compared to 5% of white Pittsburghers, emphasizing that cutting the fund would harm neighborhoods facing food apartheid.
- Elena Brown (Policy and Evaluation Manager, Pittsburgh Food Policy Council, Stan Heights): Addressed the proposed reallocation cutting the Food Justice Fund in half (item 49 of the budget amendments). She argued that food programming should be treated as a fundamental human right, not a privilege, and urged collaboration to sustain community food initiatives rather than focusing solely on cuts.
- Icahana Hal Malkina (unaffiliated speaker): Criticized the city's handling of American Rescue Plan (ARPA) funds, alleging that $335 million was not returned as required and was instead hidden. He advocated for using ARPA funds for a monthly $500 stipend for mothers (and single fathers) and for youth programming to prevent downtown takeovers.
Key Outcomes
- Public hearings were held on all four resolutions (2026-0278, 2026-0279, 2026-0280, and 2026-0285).
- All four bills were subsequently referred to the Committee on Finance and Law for further consideration.
- Enactment numbers were assigned: No. 214 (2026-0278), No. 215 (2026-0279), No. 216 (2026-0280), and No. 217 (2026-0285), indicating that the committee would proceed with formal action at a later date.
- No immediate decisions or votes were taken during the public hearing.
Meeting Transcript
Good afternoon and welcome to Pittsburgh City Council Cable Cast Public Hearing for Tuesday, April 14th, 2026, relative to the budget reopening. Would a clerk please read the title of the bills. Bill 278, resolution amending Resolution 933 of 2024, which reappropriated Federal American Rescue Plan funding by updating the approved projects as outlined in Exhibit A, version 10, Bill 279, resolution amending resolution 838 of 2025, which fixed the number of officers and employees of the City of Pittsburgh for the 2026 fiscal year and the rate of compensation thereof and set maximum levels for designated positions by eliminating one district chief and adding one assistant chief in the Department of Public Safety Bureau of Emergency Medical Services. Bill 280, resolution amending resolution 841 of 2025, which authorized appropriations, salaries and capital expenditures of the parks trust fund for the 2026 fiscal year, beginning January 1st, 2026 by increasing the spend amount by 500,000. And Bill 285, resolution amending resolution 835 of 2025, which made appropriations to pay the expenses of conducting the public business of the City of Pittsburgh and for meeting the debt charges thereof for the fiscal year beginning January 1st, 2026. Thank you very much. For the record, we're joined by Councilwoman Schlossberg, Councilman Mosley, Councilwoman Selenetro, and Councilman Gross. We will now move on to our registered speakers. After you recall, please restate your name, provide your neighborhood for the record. You'll be given three minutes to speak. Our first registered speaker is Daniel McCarthy. Good afternoon, Council. My name is Dan McCarthy. I'm an organizer with Just Harvest, and I live in Shady Side currently. Just Harvest works to address hunger in Allegheny County at the root economic injustice and through a focus on public policy, food access, direct services, and community power. I'm here today to address the budget revisions and to urge council to protect and retain the $500,000 originally allocated for the city's food justice fund. I also have a letter to share with council that had been sent to the mayor's office, and I believe sent to your offices as well, signed by a hundred Pittsburgh residents and organizations supporting the Food Justice Fund. If I can hand that to Council. Thank you. Hunger is a growing crisis in our city. Rising food costs combined with ongoing SNAP policy changes have increased pressure on an already vulnerable households across the city. At the same time, our local food systems that include farmers markets, corner stores, and community-based distribution networks are being asked to do a lot more with less. Local investments like the Food Justice Fund are especially critical as federal support becomes less reliable. Pittsburgh has many neighborhoods that are experiencing food apartheid, and one in five Pittsburgh residents are food insecure. The city's own Feed PGH report, released in 2020, identified 23 healthy food priority areas. And of these 23 areas, 18 are in predominantly black neighborhoods. While 33% of black Pittsburghers live in a healthy food priority area, only 5% of white Pittsburghers do. In order to create a Pittsburgh that works for everyone, all Pittsburghers need to be able to access and eat fresh, nutritious, culturally appropriate foods. The Food Justice Fund is needed to continue to develop new and strengthen existing community-based food initiatives to address these long-standing structural inequities in the food system. The city can invest in and empower communities to define their needs and create the food systems to meet their needs. But when you cut funding for these programs, you're cutting out neighborhoods and leaving behind those who won't benefit from this investment. I understand that the mayor and council have difficult decisions to make regarding the city's financial position, but a reduction in the $500,000 food justice fund will not solve the financial situation. Instead, it will significantly weaken a program that provides targeted community-driven investments in food access across Pittsburgh's neighborhood. Again, I'd like to urge council to reject this budget reduction for the food justice fund and to fund the program at the level we previously said you would. Thank you. Thank you. Our next register speaker is Elena Brown. Hello all. Can we hear me okay? Yes, we can. Okay. Hello, my name is Elena Brown. I'm a resident at Stan Heights. I'm also the policy and evaluation manager at the Pittsburgh Food Policy Council. Today we are discussing the reallocation of the budget, in particular, item 49 of the budget amendments. That's the cut of the food justice fund in half. I understand that the current budget situation is not favorable to spending. And I know many programs that people depend on well beyond the food justice fund are facing similar realities. Well, we may not be able to change decisions today. I hope we can shape how we move forward.
openpublica.com