Post-Agenda Discussion on Pittsburgh's Noise Ordinance for Restaurants & Bars - May 28, 2026
Post-Agenda Discussion on Pittsburgh's Noise Ordinance as it Relates to Restaurants and Bars - May 28, 2026
The City Council held a post-agenda discussion on May 28, 2026, to examine the impact of Pittsburgh's noise ordinance on restaurants and bars, focusing on the current state-level enforcement under Pennsylvania's Liquor Code. The meeting featured two panels: the first included government and law enforcement officials, and the second included business operators. The central issue is that Allegheny County and Philadelphia are subject to a zero-decibel standard for amplified sound from liquor-licensed establishments, while other Pennsylvania counties have a 75-decibel exception. The discussion explored the problems this creates for businesses, the strain on city resources, and potential solutions such as obtaining a municipal noise exemption.
Public Comments & Testimony
- Chief Jason Lando (Pittsburgh Bureau of Police) stated that the police department lacks capacity for noise enforcement due to staffing (under 800 officers) and training requirements, and that noise complaints against licensed businesses fall under state jurisdiction.
- Sgt. Andrew Robinson (PBP) described current police practice: officers informally ask bar owners to lower music if it is audible half a block away, but they cannot issue citations for liquor-licensed premises.
- Lynn Benka-Davies (Executive Director, PA House Liquor Control Committee) explained that the state's zero-decibel standard predates the 2022 change that gave other counties a 75-decibel exception, and that enforcement is complaint-driven with investigations lasting up to 30 days. She noted that only 113 liquor control enforcement officers cover the entire state for over 30,000 licenses.
- State Rep. Lindsay Powell expressed that the current system is ineffective and inequitable for both residents and businesses, and that state-level solutions are not working.
- Allison Harnden (Nighttime Economy Manager) advocated for local control, citing examples from other cities (New Orleans, Seattle, San Francisco) that use prevention, education, mediation, and non-police enforcement. She warned that a one-size-fits-all exemption could create confusion and suggested citywide implementation.
- David Kushner (Trace Brewing) argued that the zero-decibel standard disproportionately harms marginalized communities and small businesses, and that enforcement involves undercover state police. He referenced the closure of James Street Tavern in 2018 after years of LCE investigations.
- Melissa Larrick (Pittsburgh Brewers Guild) shared an example of Allegheny City Brewing being forced to cancel a permitted family-friendly music series after one complaint. She also noted that her own business, Cinderlands, pulled back on programming after an LCE investigation despite city police finding no issue.
- Chris Copen (Bottlerocket Social Hall) described a Halloween 2023 raid by the Nuisance Bar Task Force that halted a sold-out show, citing dozens of 311 noise complaints that were never communicated to him. He argued the system punishes businesses without allowing dialogue or resolution.
- Adam Valen (Drusky Entertainment/NEVA) emphasized that independent venues contribute $2 billion to Pennsylvania's GDP and support 24,000 jobs, yet only 28% were profitable in 2024. He called for a shift to sound measurement and mediation rather than liquor code enforcement.
- Alex Moser (Wigle Whiskey) reported two LCE investigations in two years triggered by a single neighbor, requiring extensive financial disclosures. He warned that recurring complaints could threaten their manufacturing license, forcing them to relocate.
Discussion Items
- Councilmember Erika Strasburger opened by measuring the room at 69 decibels to illustrate that 75 decibels is not drastically louder.
- Councilmember Bob Charland asked about best practices from other cities; Harnden listed prevention, education, and mediation programs, noting that enforcement should not primarily involve police.
- Councilmember Deb Gross corrected a misconception about decibel scaling (every 10 dB doubles perceived loudness) and stressed that sound is measurable, citing successful mitigation at a hospital and the police firing range. She called for responsible coexistence and expressed concern over the Nuisance Bar Task Force raids.
- Councilmember Bobby Wilson questioned the capacity of city agencies to enforce noise and noted that most complaints he receives are unrelated to noise from bars.
- Data presented: 32 noise citations in Allegheny County over 3.5 years (5 outside Pittsburgh), with only 2 in 2026 year-to-date. The police chief reiterated that adding noise enforcement would require significant additional manpower and training.
- Business operators emphasized that mitigation costs are high: Spirit in Lawrenceville spent $325,000 on soundproofing yet still receives complaints. They advocated for transparency, mediation, and a system that distinguishes between legitimate nuisance and weaponized complaints.
Key Outcomes
- No formal votes were taken. The discussion identified a clear need to pursue a municipal noise exemption from the state, allowing Pittsburgh to set and enforce its own decibel standards.
- Councilmember Strasburger stated that next steps include internal council discussions and tailoring a local framework to Pittsburgh's diverse neighborhoods.
- Several council members agreed that an additional separate conversation is needed regarding the Nuisance Bar Task Force, its criteria, and its impact on businesses.
Meeting Transcript
Also, Metal Sand Sand Sto Good afternoon, and welcome to Pittsburgh City Council's Cable Cast Post Agenda on Pittsburgh's Noise Ordinance as it relates to restaurants and bars for May twenty-eighth, twenty twenty-six. And for the record, we're joined in person today by Councilperson Bob Charlin and online by Councilwoman Deb Gross and Councilman Bobby Wilson, and I'm sure we'll see other council members join shortly. However, a few years ago, Allegheny County and Philadelphia were specifically prohibited by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania from having any sound above zero decibels emanating from these types of properties. Unlike Allegheny County in Philadelphia, every other county in the Commonwealth enjoys a 75 decibel-level exception that recognizes the practical realities of running a venue. The result here at home is a complaint-driven anonymous enforcement process that has left operators facing repeat citations, mounting legal costs, and in some cases the decision to give up live programming altogether. While residents wait months for resolution and see little improvement on the ground. So the bottom line is the current framework is not serving our operators, it's not serving our neighbors, and it's not serving the city. Today's conversation is really just about understanding the problem in concrete terms from the people living it and learning from state officials and law enforcement leaders joining us today who administer the current system, charting a responsible path toward local framework that is fair, predictable, and worthy of the communities that it serves. And so I am so thrilled to welcome our guests today. We're going to take this in two different panel discussions because we have a lot of invited guests and a lot of experts in their field joining us today. So on our first panel panel, I'm I'm happy to welcome our Pittsburgh Bureau of Police Chief Jason Lando. We have Lynn Davies, the Executive Director of the Liquor Control Committee in the Pennsylvania House. We have State Representative Lindsay Powell, and we have Sergeant Andrew Robinson. And then we will start, and we have Alison Harndon, our nighttime economy manager. So we'll start with this panel and then move to our next panel, which is a little bit more of the expertise from the operators of and managers and owners of our entertainment industries and our small businesses. So with that, I would love to actually we can just move right down the line if that's easiest. Each person can introduce themselves. If you have introductory remarks prepared, that's fine. I'm gonna ask us to keep it under five minutes just for the sake of time. And if you if you if you don't, that's fine. You can just introduce yourself with your name and your title and experience in this in this on this topic. Sergeant Andrew Robinson, Zen 3 Police. Uh worked Southside Entertainment Patrol for two years. Thank you. Jason Lando recently returned to Pittsburgh as the chief of police previously with the department for 21 years and was gone for the past five years, so still getting uh caught up on some of the issues and concerns, and I thank Sergeant Robinson for uh for helping out with that today. See Representative Lindsay Powell, thank you so much, Councilperson, for hosting uh this post agenda. This has been something that's been incredibly important to our district. I have the honor of representing the 21st district, which includes Lawrenceville, the strip district, Schaler, Mobile Etna, Reserve Township, and parts of the north side, and we have some wonderful vibrant parts of the city that have a density of bars and restaurants that are nestled in our neighborhoods, and so we've really struggled with the challenge of balancing, making sure that we have habitable neighborhoods where people can put their babies to bed nice and easy on a Sunday night, but also we have vibrant bars and restaurants that people want to patron. So thank you for taking up this important issue and excited to delve a little deeper into this challenging uh topic. Thank you. Good afternoon, Lynn Banka Davies. I'm the executive director of the Pennsylvania House of Representatives Liquor Control Committee. Um, and thank you for inviting me, and hopefully I can help provide a little insight into how we got here with regards to the laws and legislation and the complexity of the liquor code. Thank you. Hello, thank you for having us here today, all of us. I'm Alison Harndon, uh nighttime economy manager for the city of Pittsburgh. Um we are located, the Office of Nighttime Economy is two people located in the public safety department, and we're responsible for um being a liaison for food, beverage, entertainment businesses and the communities where they operate. So this is an important um subject for us to dive into because we see a lot of um uh stress on both sides with residents and businesses. Um our role is to help create a sociable city and one that can have peaceful coexistence with residents and businesses, but also be equitable. And um, the current I I want to be clear that I don't think that people are not doing their job. It's just they're operating in a structure that has a lot of flaws. And um, I think that we can we can have what we we're looking for as we you know figure out where the the bugs are and and find a path forward. Thanks. Thank you all so much. And so we were covertly um measuring the decibel levels of this opening conversation. Um not really covertly. The the the sound the sound noise meter was here, and just to give a sense of what 75 decibel levels is right now. We're at about 69, 6869. 75 is not that much louder than we're what we're currently talking, the levels we're currently having a regular conversation. Yes, there's some amplification here, but um uh just wanted to sort of level set what 75 decibels sounds like to the average ear close up.
openpublica.com