OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Planning Commission Study Session on Greater Downtown Area Plan - June 17, 2025

Planning CommissionTuesday, June 17, 2025
BodyRedwood City, California
SessionPlanning Commission
DateTuesday, June 17, 2025
StatusFILED
Video Record

STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE

Transcript — Verbatim
6:59

Test test.

7:00

I think mine works.

7:18

Zoom meeting items.

7:32

Okay.

7:36

All right.

7:38

Ready.

7:41

Thank you, Christina.

7:45

All right.

7:46

Good evening, and thank you for joining us for our June seventeenth, twenty twenty-five Planning Commission regular meeting.

7:52

As a reminder, items will be taken in the order they're listed on the agenda.

7:56

Before we get started, I want to briefly go over to public comment procedures for the meeting for those who may be joining us for the first time.

8:02

Public comments on the approval minutes, consent items, matters of commission interest and items not on the agenda will be taken during item number two on this evening.

8:11

Comments on other agenda items will be taken only when the item is called.

8:14

We're continuing to offer in-person and remote options for a planning commission meetings, however, due to the continued recent disruptions during public comment at open meetings throughout our region and state.org.

8:52

In-person speakers must turn in a speaker card to our admin or staffly is on a day as to be recognized to speak.

9:06

Comments that were emailed to PC at ReboCity.org by five PM today may be read into the record by Staff Lee is on, and will be made part of the final meeting record.

9:15

Both in-person and email comments are subject to a three-minute time limit.

9:31

Here.

10:00

Apollo Rojas, senior planner, Rick Jarvis, Consultant City Attorney.

10:03

Sue Xline, Assistant Community Development Director joining virtually, and Christina Mateo, admin secretary and meeting host.

10:12

Thank you.

10:15

Item number two, public comments on the approval of minutes.

10:18

At this time, we will take public comments from those joining us in person only.

10:22

We're temporarily suspending public comment provided by Zoom.

10:25

If you have joined us in person, please feel out a speaker's card and bring it to the staff.

10:30

Okay, as we have no current um in-person public comments.

10:36

Were there any public comments received by email?

10:39

We have not received any public comments via email.

10:42

Thank you.

10:42

If there's no objection, I will now close the public comment.

10:46

Moving on to uh to item number three, approval of minutes.

10:50

Um we have June 3rd meeting 2025.

10:54

Is there a motion to approve the draft meeting minutes of June 3rd, 2025?

10:59

I'll I'll uh make a motion to approve those minutes.

11:02

Moved by Commissioner Hunter.

11:04

Second.

11:04

Second by Commissioner Koch.

11:12

Um roll call for the motion.

11:15

Uh Commissioner Budd.

11:16

Aye.

11:17

Uh Commissioner Cornejo.

11:20

Yes.

11:20

Uh Commissioner Finch.

11:22

Yes.

11:23

Commissioner Hunter?

11:24

Yes.

11:25

Commissioner Robinson.

11:26

Yes.

11:27

Vice Chair Koch?

11:28

Yes.

11:28

And Chair Sigonarak.

11:30

Yes.

11:31

Uh motion passes 7-0.

11:34

All right.

11:35

Uh the next item on the agenda calendar is consent calendar.

11:38

There are no items on tonight's consent calendar, so we will move on to agenda item number five.

11:43

Um five is public hearings.

11:46

There are no items on tonight's public hearing.

11:48

We will now move on to agenda item number six.

11:51

Six is a staff report.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Land Use Planning██████████████████████22%
Community Engagement███████████████████19%
Transportation Safety███████████████15%
Parks and Recreation█████████9%
Procedural████████8%
Affordable Housing██████6%
Historic Preservation████4%
Public Health███3%
Miscellaneous███3%
Summary of Proceedings

Redwood City Planning Commission Regular Meeting – June 17, 2025

The Planning Commission held a study session to review the existing conditions summary for the Greater Downtown Area Plan (GDAP), a successor to the 2011 Downtown Precise Plan. The meeting began at 6:00 PM and adjourned at 8:30 PM. Commissioners present: Bhat, Cornejo, Finch, Hunter, Robinson, Vice Chair Koch, and Chair Crnogorac. No commissioners were absent.

Consent Calendar

  • None on the agenda.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Glenn Babbitt (member of Historic Resources Advisory Committee, speaking personally) expressed strong support for historic preservation, noting that the three historic districts in the plan area (Main Street, Stambaugh-Heller, Mezesville) provide active housing and commercial successes (e.g., Fox Theatre, Hotel Sequoia). He urged the city to vigorously promote the Mills Act program and fast-track updating the historic preservation ordinance to energize the study area.

Discussion Items

  • Staff Report (Item 6): Principal Planner John Francis and consultants from WRT, ARUP, and EPS presented the existing conditions analysis for the GDAP, covering four topic areas: community character, community vibrancy, public realm, mobility and connectivity, and climate resilience and infrastructure. Key statistics highlighted:
    • The plan area contains nearly 20% of Redwood City’s population.
    • Median age in the plan area is 33.4 years.
    • Over 50% of residents do not speak English as a primary language; 39% speak Spanish.
    • The Stambaugh-Heller neighborhood is a designated disadvantaged community per the Healthy Planning Index and CalEnviroScreen criteria (educational attainment, income, access to opportunities).
    • The plan area accounts for 60% of all housing built in Redwood City over the last 10 years, outperforming the city and county in multifamily housing production.
    • There are 86 contributing historic resources and 9 individual landmarks in three districts (Main Street, Stambaugh-Heller, Mezesville).
    • Barriers to connectivity include El Camino Real, Whipple, Woodside, Veterans Boulevard, and Highway 101.
    • Flood risk analysis shows significant vulnerability present-day and increasing by 2100, with sea level rise, groundwater, and inland flooding layered.
  • Commissioner Clarifying Questions and Discussion:
    • Commissioner Finch asked about off-street parking occupancy (data to follow), Spanish-language door-to-door canvassing, and engagement with renters. Staff confirmed working with community organization Nuestra Casa and planning direct engagement.
    • Commissioner Cornejo asked about the Spanish-speaking focus group size (small groups of CBO staff) and requested breakdown of race vs. language data. Staff noted the census treats Latino/Hispanic as ethnicity, not race, and will provide additional data.
    • Commissioner Bhat questioned the language pie chart labeling (“English only” – clarified as “English” as primary language) and the westward boundary of the plan area at El Camino Real; staff cited neighborhood association boundaries and focus on connectivity needs in Stambaugh-Heller and Centennial.
    • Commissioner Koch asked about senior outreach (focus group held with CBO staff, not residents) and how unbuilt approved projects affect planning; staff noted entitlements expire and the plan may adjust.
    • Commissioner Robinson asked about mobility for school-age children and daycare availability; staff acknowledged youth engagement and recent zoning changes to facilitate childcare.
    • Commissioner Hunter asked about funding (from general fund via building permit fees) and performance gaps relative to the 2011 DTPP; staff will follow up on remaining capacity.
    • Chair Crnogorac asked about green infrastructure for flooding – staff said plan will coordinate with regional levy strategies and localized measures.
  • Commissioner Discussion:
    • Commissioner Finch supported focusing retail on nodes rather than ubiquitous ground-floor along El Camino Real, citing vacant storefronts on new developments. Consultant Jason Moody agreed, noting challenges of fast traffic and lack of line-of-sight parking on El Camino Real.
    • Commissioner Bott emphasized housing production as a key priority, noting that half of Centennial within the plan area is historic district, limiting redevelopment. Staff responded that the Housing Element rezoning in 2023 created opportunities and that economic headwinds currently hinder construction.
    • Commissioner Hunter noted the area includes three qualified opportunity zones (Stambaugh-Heller) and urged using that tool for economic development. He also stressed the need for more parks, citing limited existing ones (e.g., Roselli Park considered unsafe).
    • Commissioner Finch raised opportunities for “missing middle” housing via ADUs and smaller multifamily. Staff confirmed recent zoning changes encourage such housing.
    • Commissioner Finch and others discussed street width and calming (especially Veterans Boulevard) – staff are exploring narrowing, medians, greening, and safety improvements, with multiple objectives (connectivity, climate, mode shift).
    • Commissioner Robinson noted the loss of recreational amenities (bowling alley, skating rink) and suggested land uses north of Veterans could host for-profit family entertainment venues.
    • Chair Crnogorac warned against diffusing the downtown’s concentrated energy by expanding too quickly; staff clarified the GDAP includes adjacent neighborhoods to address infrastructure deficits (flooding, heat islands), not to dissolve neighborhood identities.
    • Commissioner Finch noted the county center area feels like a dead zone at night; staff highlighted a new county building café and farmers markets, and plans to better integrate the campus (e.g., Hamilton Green linear park connector).

Key Outcomes

  • Approval of June 3, 2025 Minutes: Motion by Hunter, second by Koch; passed 7-0.
  • The study session was informational; no formal decisions were made on the GDAP.
  • Staff will incorporate commissioner and public feedback into the next phases: framework alternatives and continued community engagement (focus groups, speaker series, Spanish-language canvassing, open house, survey).
  • Next Planning Commission regular meetings: July 15, 2025 (may be cancelled) and August 19, 2025 (tentatively scheduled: Redwood Life EIR scoping and one development project).

Meeting Transcript

Test test. I think mine works. Zoom meeting items. Okay. All right. Ready. Thank you, Christina. All right. Good evening, and thank you for joining us for our June seventeenth, twenty twenty-five Planning Commission regular meeting. As a reminder, items will be taken in the order they're listed on the agenda. Before we get started, I want to briefly go over to public comment procedures for the meeting for those who may be joining us for the first time. Public comments on the approval minutes, consent items, matters of commission interest and items not on the agenda will be taken during item number two on this evening. Comments on other agenda items will be taken only when the item is called. We're continuing to offer in-person and remote options for a planning commission meetings, however, due to the continued recent disruptions during public comment at open meetings throughout our region and state.org. In-person speakers must turn in a speaker card to our admin or staffly is on a day as to be recognized to speak. Comments that were emailed to PC at ReboCity.org by five PM today may be read into the record by Staff Lee is on, and will be made part of the final meeting record. Both in-person and email comments are subject to a three-minute time limit. Here. Apollo Rojas, senior planner, Rick Jarvis, Consultant City Attorney. Sue Xline, Assistant Community Development Director joining virtually, and Christina Mateo, admin secretary and meeting host. Thank you. Item number two, public comments on the approval of minutes. At this time, we will take public comments from those joining us in person only. We're temporarily suspending public comment provided by Zoom. If you have joined us in person, please feel out a speaker's card and bring it to the staff. Okay, as we have no current um in-person public comments. Were there any public comments received by email? We have not received any public comments via email. Thank you. If there's no objection, I will now close the public comment. Moving on to uh to item number three, approval of minutes. Um we have June 3rd meeting 2025. Is there a motion to approve the draft meeting minutes of June 3rd, 2025? I'll I'll uh make a motion to approve those minutes. Moved by Commissioner Hunter. Second. Second by Commissioner Koch. Um roll call for the motion. Uh Commissioner Budd. Aye. Uh Commissioner Cornejo. Yes. Uh Commissioner Finch. Yes. Commissioner Hunter? Yes. Commissioner Robinson. Yes. Vice Chair Koch? Yes.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com