Richmond City Council Budget Work Session - April 13, 2026
Richmond City Council Budget Work Session - April 13, 2026
This work session, held on April 13, 2026, was convened for Richmond City Council members to present and discuss their proposed budget amendments for the upcoming fiscal years. Each council member was allotted 10 minutes to explain their amendments, with opportunities for colleagues to ask questions. No public comment was heard. The session focused on a wide range of proposals covering public safety, housing, youth programming, infrastructure, and retiree benefits. A deadline of April 14, 2026 at 5:00 PM was set for members to indicate co-patronage of any amendment. The next work session for deliberation is scheduled for April 15, 2026.
Discussion Items
Councilmember Breton presented multiple amendments including: financing the Sports Backers land purchase with debt instead of the contingency fund; adding resources to 311 and liaisons for DPU and DPW; adding 10 inspectors to PDR (permits and enforcement); funding an energy efficiency coordinator; adding legal support for the city assessor (deferred); reinstating separate budget codes for forestry and transportation transparency; funding lights at Thomas Jefferson High School; creating management services guidelines; breaking out street safety spending (Complete Streets, Safe Streets for All) for transparency; dedicating a portion of Complete Streets to the People's Budget; funding the People's Budget with $5 million in FY28; supporting the Richmond Ed Fund for a teacher retention program; and making a citywide school safety CIP investment.
Council Vice President Jurden proposed two amendments: funding two FTEs for planning department to implement Richmond 300 (funded through vacancies); and zeroing out $500,000 for Richmond Gasworks new business extensions, with interest in redirecting to affordability initiatives like Metro Care.
Councilmember Gibson prioritized funding for: Richmond Virtual Academy (citing 20-30% special needs students and 100% graduation rate); social services FTEs (84.5% reimbursed); custodial contract wage increases to $20/hour (additional $500,000 needed); immigrant and refugee engagement with interpretation/translation services ($171,000); a study on transitioning to city-owned utilities ($100,000); text amendments on severance pay (opposing unfunded mandate and tying to tenure), aligning affordable housing trust fund language with ordinance, and requesting an RPS audit; and funding for a proactive audit FTE at City Hall ($130,000).
Councilmember Robertson focused on housing and economic development: text amendment to clarify affordable housing trust fund allocation; adding $10 million to CIP for housing preservation; creating a neighborhood displacement prevention grant; funding a model inclusive neighborhood plan (targeting areas like South Side); coordinating homeless services into a one-stop; capitalizing on faith-based development opportunities; funding economic development for the central business district including a workforce hub; land acquisition funds; aligning CIP with small area plans; and a text amendment mandating performance metrics for all departments (removing "to be determined") before budget implementation.
Councilmember Lynch presented amendments for: equipment for Randolph Community Center ($40,000); senior mail communication ($75,000); encumbering remaining CIP funds for Fonticello Park ($700,000-$800,000); a consultant to redevelop Clark Springs Elementary footprint for senior affordable housing and potential new high school; increasing the Family Crisis Fund (utility and rent assistance); $250,000 for asphalt alley dedicated funding; and dedicated funding for traffic safety plans (speed tables, bump outs).
Councilmember Trammell urged support for: funding Richmond Ambulance Authority (RAA) to replace old ambulances (documenting unfulfilled promises from prior administration); a 1.5% cost-of-living adjustment (COLA) for city retirees (none since 2016); and converting a proposed $1 million retiree bonus into permanent COLA funding. She also backed funding for Richmond Virtual Academy.
Councilmember Alba-Backer presented: a text amendment to strike severance language; a 3.25% across-the-board salary increase for all employees; a traffic study for the Westover Hills/Forest Hill corridor ($half million); and reconfiguring the drop-off lane at Westover Hills Elementary ($500,000) to also serve as parking for Westover Park.
Councilmember Jones submitted amendments for: a splash pad at Brock Sports Complex (repeat request); and $300,000 for programming at Southside Community Center (youth innovation, technology, arts, music). She emphasized the need to prioritize young people citywide.
Council President Newbille proposed: $700,000 for transportation and security for RPS after-school programs; restoring a customer service representative in the assessor's office (funded via council staff vacancy); repurposing $538,287 originally allocated for an East End Teen Center (now addressed by other facilities) toward affordable, quality child care centers; joining Trammell on 1.5% COLA for retirees; and $800,000 for RAA to lease and purchase vehicles to reach full fleet complement.
Key Outcomes
- All council members presented their budget amendments and provided rationale. No votes were taken.
- Council Chief of Staff RJ Warren set a deadline of April 14, 2026 at 5:00 PM for members to notify him if they wish to co-patron any amendment.
- The next budget work session for deliberation and consensus-building is scheduled for April 15, 2026 at 1:00 PM, with city administration present to provide feedback.
- Several members expressed support for common items: retiree COLA, ambulance authority funding, Richmond Virtual Academy, and affordable housing trust fund alignment.
Meeting Transcript
Good afternoon, everyone. The city council's budget work session will now come to order. We'll ask that the chamber emergency evacuation announcement be made. And then uh our chief of staff, Mr. Warren will come with our process procedures for this meeting. On activation of the emergency alarm signal, all persons should immediately exit the building. Please use the exits to the left or right front of the council chamber or the east or west stairwell outside the rear doors of the chamber. Do not use elevators or escalators. After exiting the building, security will direct everyone down 9th Street to the assembly area located inside the former public safety building parking lot. Able persons should assist visually and hearing impaired visitors with exiting the building. Yes, may I please Council RJ Warren, Council Chief of Staff, this is your first budget amendment work session today. And how today we'll proceed. This is primarily for dialogue between council members on their proposed amendments. Each member has been provided a uh list of their individual amendments they can reference and how this is going to work is uh each member is going to be provided 10 minutes to provide the the background, the reasoning, the intent of their amendments. If during that explanation a colleague has a question, uh we ask that colleague just to light up their microphone and the presiding officer will acknowledge them and allow them to uh ask a question of their colleague at that time. Uh that question will not take away from your time. Uh so if someone's asking you a very lengthy question, that won't take from your time. Um, but when you respond, uh their clock will restart. Um, but we're gonna see how this goes. I'm not trying to prevent you all from speaking with one another. And um we'll see if there's need for more time as uh explanations continue. Um the posted amendments uh were provided on Thursday to through all of City Hall, the public, and um that is just an initial draft based on conversations today. Uh your staff are going to see where certain amendments can be combined. Uh, we're looking forward to city administration being here to get your reasonings and explanation. Um maybe they will find where some of your requests are already being taken care of and could be crossed off, or maybe where some collaboration can take place. Um again, if as you hear the explanation and the reasoning from your colleagues today about their amendments, if you wish to co-patron any amendment by your uh colleagues, I just ask that you let me know the deadline because that will help facilitate how we review amendments on Wednesday. So if you desire to co-patron any amendment put forward by your colleagues, just let me know by the end of business tomorrow. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you for the opportunity. So I guess if you're following along with our on our green sheets, is that right? What we're using. So um uh so all of page one is actually my attempt at being very constructive, collaborative, and helpful at finding opportunities for cuts to support whatever other goals that we all may share. So now these cuts have not all been um you know judged or answered back by administration, but basically my tactic on finding these was to identify items in the budget where the actual from fiscal 25 um was something small and then the proposed for fiscal 27 was something very large. And so it just seemed where there was a big disconnect between what we actually spent in 25 and what we're proposing in 27. And so in those cases, I would flag them, and I would suggest that maybe we don't need to increase them by quite so much, and maybe there's some opportunities for savings there. Now I don't have any feedback on any of those yet. So I'm any of these might we might get feedback from administration that these are all crazy and terrible, but um when we get that feedback. Yeah, but we can we can we can judge those. So that's the interesting stuff is my goals, which start on page two, the second page. So um when you go to the third row, um these are all proposals here that I want to submit. And you know, to the extent anybody wants to join me in supporting them, we can discuss them. So um row three is the suggestion that we might want to um finance that sports backers land purchase with debt instead of with the um contingency fund. So I know the contingency fund purchased a um you know uh a note from the EDA in order to help support that transaction, but you know it we might find that it's more appropriate to finance that with a you know another form of debt, replenish the cash balance in the contingency fund, and that way in the event of a contingency, we'll have more liquidity in that fund. So um just a proposal that I'm floating out there. The next three are related to um 311 and customer service and making uh some of our high volume departments kind of better integrated with 311 because we do want everybody using 311 as much as possible. It's a great service. Um we want everyone to make sure that if they have follow-up questions, escalations that they can also turn to 311 for that. So one of them is an extra um resource within the 311 team to integrate DPU and integrate some DPW like trash collection services. Um and the other are to get an additional staff in each of DPU and DPW for someone who can take escalations, answer questions, the same way that we have liaisons from those departments who are fantastic at helping get us information.
openpublica.com