OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Richmond City Council Budget Work Session - April 15, 2026

City CouncilWednesday, April 15, 2026
BodyRichmond, Virginia
SessionCity Council
DateWednesday, April 15, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 2:24:45

Transcript — Verbatim
17:56

Right.

17:58

Thanks for the shout-out.

18:16

I'll be happy to leave it to the okay.

18:31

I'm trying to wait.

18:40

Good afternoon, everyone.

18:43

Good afternoon, everyone.

18:45

The city council's budget work session will now come to order.

18:51

Madam Clerk or Mr.

18:53

Clark, if you would provide the emergency evacuation plan announcement.

18:59

Upon activation of the emergency alarm signal, all persons should immediately exit the building.

19:03

Please use the exits to the left or right front of the council chamber or the east or west stairwell outside the rear doors of the chamber.

19:10

Do not use elevators or escalators.

19:12

After exiting the building, security will direct everyone down ninth street to the assembly area located inside the former public safety building parking lot.

19:20

Able persons should assist visually and hearing impaired visitors with exiting the building.

20:00

We actually, I believe, have time for you all still to review, analyze and discuss some of these amendments before making any decisions, which can occur next week.

20:11

And before you and post it online is the most updated version of the proposed amendments submitted by council members that have been updated to reflect uh co-patronage, um, additional information provided to us by city administration or involved parties.

20:27

We went ahead and proactively combined certain amendments that uh were put forward by multiple members.

20:33

And I am going to go through these in a moment, not one by one, but just note some highlights that I think need I need to bring to your attention afterwards.

20:41

Uh, we'll be available to answer any immediate questions from you all after that.

20:46

Um, I will then proceed through um uh specifically the text amendments and the capital the CIP amendments uh to see if you all have any specific questions on that and to invite city administration at that time to address uh text and CIP amendments uh to share information they have on the goals of those amendments.

21:06

Mr.

21:07

Warren, would you also re-emphasize the uh opportunity in terms of extended time for submitting patronage for papers?

21:16

Yes.

21:17

Um because we have more time to make decisions on these amendments, the deadline to submit uh a request to co-patron any item has been extended to this Thursday, the 16th at 5 p.m.

21:28

You just need to inform me, and that will be updated.

21:30

And we hope to have a finalized document uh by Friday to put online and to provide to members and the public for you all to make decisions on on Monday.

21:39

And um, and then you know, if you all have any questions, we're not gonna say we're gonna put the clock up to to be mindful of time, but uh I will be available so we'll send administration.

21:50

Um thank you.

21:51

Yes, so to proceed through uh if you can put that on a line, sir.

22:10

Thank you very much.

22:11

Um on the proposed text amendments, this is just something to note.

22:14

Uh the uh RPS audit um for funding uh for funding RPS audit independently.

22:20

Um it is both a text amendment and a general fund amendment uh because uh it has been estimated that a cost for this item would be roughly 175,000 that would be needed.

22:34

Uh so that has been updated.

22:39

And to note on page three of the first amendment, the um establishment of a dedicated mail line item.

22:46

We've been informed by city administration that item is already being currently addressed in the budget and will be as well next year.

22:54

The um third item, I just want to note a customer service representative to the city assessor's office to be allocated from the office of the council chief of staff.

23:03

That seems to be receiving um consensus amongst you all, and I don't see any issues with that provided going forward.

23:17

Um another update.

23:20

Let me go to page five here.

23:22

And for the uh amendment put forward by Ms.

23:25

Trammell for the Richmond Virtual Academy.

23:27

The thing I just want to note from council staff, we updated the the number of what that might cost.

23:32

Our initial analysis had that at 1.6 million.

23:35

We've been provided updated numbers from RPS that for that specific program it would require 3.2 million.

23:43

So that number has been increased.

23:54

And one thing to note that may require additional discussion after I've concluded is uh Ms.

24:00

Gibson's amendment on page or miss uh yes, Ms.

24:03

Gibson's amendment on page seven, the first one regarding social services, FTEs.

24:07

There's been discussions between Ms.

24:09

Gibson and City Administration on this matter, and that this item may be able to not require such a large um amendment of transferred funding as a lot of this might be uh redeemable uh funding from the state.

24:24

Um if you want to provide any clarity to that at this time, if that's if that's available.

24:29

Yeah.

24:30

Um thank you.

24:31

Yeah, so the uh let me find that line item.

24:35

I'm sorry, which page are we on?

24:36

Top of page seven.

24:38

Seven.

24:40

Okay, yes.

24:41

So the um the ask is for essentially five FTEs.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Education Funding████████████████16%
Community Engagement█████████9%
Personnel Matters████████8%
Procedural███████7%
Fiscal Sustainability███████7%
Youth Programs██████6%
Transportation Safety██████6%
Public Safety██████6%
Engineering And Infrastructure█████5%
Summary of Proceedings

Richmond City Council Budget Work Session - April 15, 2026

The Richmond City Council held a budget work session on April 15, 2026, to review proposed text amendments and Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) amendments for the FY27 budget. Council members discussed funding priorities, received clarifications from city administration, and deferred final decisions to a subsequent meeting on April 20.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Members of the public, including parents of students with disabilities, urged council to support funding for the Richmond Virtual Academy and other school programs. Council members noted the emotional pleas but no formal public testimony was transcribed.

Discussion Items

  • Text Amendments:

    • Strike Severance Language: A proposal to remove new language from the pay plan that would allow up to one year of severance for senior executives. Council members questioned whether this would conflict with existing contracts; administration noted it would not affect previous agreements but would require further legal review.
    • Housing Trust Fund Language: An amendment to fix language ensuring the Affordable Housing Trust Fund receives agreed-upon funding. City administration expressed support, with clarification on bonding mechanism (pay-as-you-go model).
    • RPS Audit: A text and general fund amendment to allocate $175,000 for an independent third-party audit of Richmond Public Schools’ budget, contracted through the city auditor’s office. Councilmember Gibson argued the audit is needed due to inconsistencies in RPS budget submissions (e.g., a “typo” of 10 FTEs and unclear collective bargaining costs).
    • Richmond Virtual Academy: Initial cost estimate of $1.6 million from council staff was revised to $3.2 million based on RPS information. Councilmembers expressed frustration over conflicting numbers and demanded written documentation. It was clarified that if RPS is not fully funded, the virtual academy could be cut, but RPS controls allocation of funds.
    • Transportation and Security for After-School Programs: Initially requested at $700,000, the city and RPS refined the estimate to $428,000 for two security guards at all middle schools and associated transportation. Councilmembers requested detailed breakdowns by school and radius.
  • CIP Amendments:

    • Forest Hill Avenue Traffic Study: Originally $500,000, but Director of Public Works Bobby Vincent stated the study cost would be approximately $100,000 and work is already underway with VDOT.
    • Citywide School Safety Study Recommendations: Councilmember Breton proposed $500,000 for implementing safety projects identified in a study of eight high-injury-network schools. DPW indicated some work is already covered by existing budgets and grants.
    • Gas New Business Funding: Councilmember Jordan proposed eliminating $500,000 for new gas business, citing sufficient existing funds and city goals to transition from fossil fuels. Public Utilities Director Scott Morris confirmed no impact on rates or operations.
    • Transparent Street Safety Spending: Councilmember Breton requested a detailed breakdown of the $21 million in complete streets funding (paving, sidewalks, speed tables, etc.). DPW agreed to provide periodic presentations and a public dashboard.
    • TJ High School Football Field Lights: Councilmember Breton proposed $250,000 in FY28 to leverage matching grants for lighting. Councilmember Gibson called for a citywide inventory of school athletic facilities lacking lighting.
    • People’s Budget Alignment: Discussion on integrating participatory budgeting into the city’s process. CAO Odie Donald confirmed that the participatory budgeting group was moved under his authority and that alignment will be ongoing; previous distribution was criticized by Councilmember Trammell for inequity.
    • Commonwealth Attorney’s Budget: Commonwealth Attorney expressed concern over a reported $241,000 cut. Administration clarified it was a technical adjustment in personnel funding, not a reduction in positions or operations, and that a meeting with finance is scheduled.
    • Assessor’s Customer Service Representative: Council staff proposed transferring a vacant position from the council chief of staff’s office to the assessor’s office to handle walk-in inquiries. Assessor Richie McKeachin noted the position was lost during COVID and is needed to free appraisers from front-desk duties.
  • Other Updates:

    • City Auditor Riyadh Lee provided an update on ongoing audits: revenue refund compliance, procurement-to-payment, and fire department payroll processes. He highlighted the revenue refund audit as a priority.
    • Councilmember Trammell announced availability of tax relief application forms for elderly and disabled residents, thanking the CAO for expediting distribution.

Key Outcomes

  • All formal decisions on amendments were deferred to Monday, April 20, 2026, to allow further analysis and documentation from city administration.
  • Deadline to request co-patronage of amendments extended to Thursday, April 16 at 5 p.m.
  • Council staff were directed to obtain written documentation from RPS on the cost breakdown for the Virtual Academy and the transportation/security program.
  • The assessor’s customer service representative transfer received apparent consensus and is expected to be approved on Monday.
  • Council will explore available funding sources, including the GAAP grant program, to support amendments.
  • No votes were taken during this work session.

Meeting Transcript

Right. Thanks for the shout-out. I'll be happy to leave it to the okay. I'm trying to wait. Good afternoon, everyone. Good afternoon, everyone. The city council's budget work session will now come to order. Madam Clerk or Mr. Clark, if you would provide the emergency evacuation plan announcement. Upon activation of the emergency alarm signal, all persons should immediately exit the building. Please use the exits to the left or right front of the council chamber or the east or west stairwell outside the rear doors of the chamber. Do not use elevators or escalators. After exiting the building, security will direct everyone down ninth street to the assembly area located inside the former public safety building parking lot. Able persons should assist visually and hearing impaired visitors with exiting the building. We actually, I believe, have time for you all still to review, analyze and discuss some of these amendments before making any decisions, which can occur next week. And before you and post it online is the most updated version of the proposed amendments submitted by council members that have been updated to reflect uh co-patronage, um, additional information provided to us by city administration or involved parties. We went ahead and proactively combined certain amendments that uh were put forward by multiple members. And I am going to go through these in a moment, not one by one, but just note some highlights that I think need I need to bring to your attention afterwards. Uh, we'll be available to answer any immediate questions from you all after that. Um, I will then proceed through um uh specifically the text amendments and the capital the CIP amendments uh to see if you all have any specific questions on that and to invite city administration at that time to address uh text and CIP amendments uh to share information they have on the goals of those amendments. Mr. Warren, would you also re-emphasize the uh opportunity in terms of extended time for submitting patronage for papers? Yes. Um because we have more time to make decisions on these amendments, the deadline to submit uh a request to co-patron any item has been extended to this Thursday, the 16th at 5 p.m. You just need to inform me, and that will be updated. And we hope to have a finalized document uh by Friday to put online and to provide to members and the public for you all to make decisions on on Monday. And um, and then you know, if you all have any questions, we're not gonna say we're gonna put the clock up to to be mindful of time, but uh I will be available so we'll send administration. Um thank you. Yes, so to proceed through uh if you can put that on a line, sir. Thank you very much. Um on the proposed text amendments, this is just something to note. Uh the uh RPS audit um for funding uh for funding RPS audit independently. Um it is both a text amendment and a general fund amendment uh because uh it has been estimated that a cost for this item would be roughly 175,000 that would be needed. Uh so that has been updated. And to note on page three of the first amendment, the um establishment of a dedicated mail line item. We've been informed by city administration that item is already being currently addressed in the budget and will be as well next year. The um third item, I just want to note a customer service representative to the city assessor's office to be allocated from the office of the council chief of staff. That seems to be receiving um consensus amongst you all, and I don't see any issues with that provided going forward. Um another update. Let me go to page five here. And for the uh amendment put forward by Ms. Trammell for the Richmond Virtual Academy. The thing I just want to note from council staff, we updated the the number of what that might cost. Our initial analysis had that at 1.6 million. We've been provided updated numbers from RPS that for that specific program it would require 3.2 million. So that number has been increased. And one thing to note that may require additional discussion after I've concluded is uh Ms. Gibson's amendment on page or miss uh yes, Ms. Gibson's amendment on page seven, the first one regarding social services, FTEs. There's been discussions between Ms.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com