The Richmond City Council held a budget work session on April 15, 2026, to review proposed text amendments and Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) amendments for the FY27 budget. Council members discussed funding priorities, received clarifications from city administration, and deferred final decisions to a subsequent meeting on April 20.
Text Amendments:
CIP Amendments:
Other Updates:
Right. Thanks for the shout-out. I'll be happy to leave it to the okay. I'm trying to wait. Good afternoon, everyone. Good afternoon, everyone. The city council's budget work session will now come to order. Madam Clerk or Mr. Clark, if you would provide the emergency evacuation plan announcement. Upon activation of the emergency alarm signal, all persons should immediately exit the building. Please use the exits to the left or right front of the council chamber or the east or west stairwell outside the rear doors of the chamber. Do not use elevators or escalators. After exiting the building, security will direct everyone down ninth street to the assembly area located inside the former public safety building parking lot. Able persons should assist visually and hearing impaired visitors with exiting the building. We actually, I believe, have time for you all still to review, analyze and discuss some of these amendments before making any decisions, which can occur next week. And before you and post it online is the most updated version of the proposed amendments submitted by council members that have been updated to reflect uh co-patronage, um, additional information provided to us by city administration or involved parties. We went ahead and proactively combined certain amendments that uh were put forward by multiple members. And I am going to go through these in a moment, not one by one, but just note some highlights that I think need I need to bring to your attention afterwards. Uh, we'll be available to answer any immediate questions from you all after that. Um, I will then proceed through um uh specifically the text amendments and the capital the CIP amendments uh to see if you all have any specific questions on that and to invite city administration at that time to address uh text and CIP amendments uh to share information they have on the goals of those amendments. Mr. Warren, would you also re-emphasize the uh opportunity in terms of extended time for submitting patronage for papers? Yes. Um because we have more time to make decisions on these amendments, the deadline to submit uh a request to co-patron any item has been extended to this Thursday, the 16th at 5 p.m. You just need to inform me, and that will be updated. And we hope to have a finalized document uh by Friday to put online and to provide to members and the public for you all to make decisions on on Monday. And um, and then you know, if you all have any questions, we're not gonna say we're gonna put the clock up to to be mindful of time, but uh I will be available so we'll send administration. Um thank you. Yes, so to proceed through uh if you can put that on a line, sir. Thank you very much. Um on the proposed text amendments, this is just something to note. Uh the uh RPS audit um for funding uh for funding RPS audit independently. Um it is both a text amendment and a general fund amendment uh because uh it has been estimated that a cost for this item would be roughly 175,000 that would be needed. Uh so that has been updated. And to note on page three of the first amendment, the um establishment of a dedicated mail line item. We've been informed by city administration that item is already being currently addressed in the budget and will be as well next year. The um third item, I just want to note a customer service representative to the city assessor's office to be allocated from the office of the council chief of staff. That seems to be receiving um consensus amongst you all, and I don't see any issues with that provided going forward. Um another update. Let me go to page five here. And for the uh amendment put forward by Ms. Trammell for the Richmond Virtual Academy. The thing I just want to note from council staff, we updated the the number of what that might cost. Our initial analysis had that at 1.6 million. We've been provided updated numbers from RPS that for that specific program it would require 3.2 million. So that number has been increased. And one thing to note that may require additional discussion after I've concluded is uh Ms. Gibson's amendment on page or miss uh yes, Ms. Gibson's amendment on page seven, the first one regarding social services, FTEs. There's been discussions between Ms.