The Richmond City Council held a budget work session on April 15, 2026, to review proposed text and capital improvement plan (CIP) amendments. No formal decisions were made; further discussion and voting were scheduled for the following Monday, April 20, 2026. The deadline for council members to submit co-patronage requests was extended to Thursday, April 16, at 5 p.m.
Good afternoon, everyone. Good afternoon, everyone. The city council's budget work session will now come to order. Madam Clerk or Mr. Clark, if you would provide the emergency evacuation plan announcement upon activation of the emergency alarm signal, all persons should immediately exit the building. Please use the exits to the left or right front of the council chamber or the east or west stairwell outside the rear doors of the chamber. Do not use elevators or escalators. After exiting the building, security will direct everyone down 9th Street to the assembly area located inside the former public safety building parking lot. Able persons should assist visually and hearing impaired visitors with exiting the building. And for the record, Madam President, all members of council are in attendance this afternoon except for counselor lynch. Thank you, Mr. Clark. We will now have our council chief of staff, Mr. Warren, provide the protocol for today's work session and then get underway. Yes, may I please the council, RJ Warren, Council Chief of Staff. Thank you all for being here today. It was anticipated that we were probably going to begin some decision makings today, but because you all work so well on these budget work sessions so far and announcing your amendments last week. We actually, I believe, have time for you all still to review, analyze and discuss some of these amendments before making any decisions, which can occur next week. And before you and post it online is the most updated version of the proposed amendments submitted by council members. They have been updated to reflect uh co-patronage, um, additional information provided to us by city administration or involved parties. We went ahead and proactively combined certain amendments that uh were put forward by multiple members. And I'm going to go through these in a moment, not one by one, but just note some highlights that I think need I need to bring to your attention afterwards. Uh, we'll be available to answer any immediate questions from you all after that. Um, I will then proceed through um uh specifically the text amendments and the capital the CIP amendments uh to see if you all have any specific questions on that and to invite city administration at that time to address uh text and CIP amendments uh to share information they have on the goals of those amendments. Mr. Warren, would you also re-emphasize the uh opportunity in terms of extended time for submitting patronage for papers? Yes. Um, because we have more time to make decisions on these amendments, the deadline to submit uh a request to co-patron any item has been extended to this Thursday, the 16th at 5 p.m. You just need to inform me, and that will be updated. And we hope to have a finalized document uh by Friday to put online and to provide to members and the public for you all to make decisions on on Monday. And um, and then you know, if you all have any questions, we're not gonna necessarily we're gonna put the clock up to to be mindful of time, but uh I will be available in Soul City Administration. Um Thank you. Yes, so to proceed through uh if you can put that on line, sir. Thank you very much. Um, on the proposed text amendments, this is just something to note. Uh the uh RPS audit um for funding uh for funding RPS audit independently. Um it is both a text amendment and a general fund amendment uh because uh it has been estimated that a cost for this item would be roughly 175,000 that would be needed. Uh so that has been updated. And to note on page three of the first amendment, the um establishment of a dedicated mail line item. We've been informed by city administration that item is already being currently addressed in the budget and will be as well next year. The um third item, I just want to note a customer service representative to the city assessor's office to be allocated from the office of the council chief of staff. That seems to be receiving um consensus amongst you all, and I don't see any issues with that provid going forward. Another update. Let me go to page five here. And for the uh amendment forward by Ms. Trammell for the Richmond Virtual Academy. The thing I just want to note from council staff, we updated the the number of what that might cost. Our initial analysis had that at 1.6 million. We've been provided updated numbers from RPS that for that specific program, it would require 3.2 million. So that number has been increased.