Richmond City Council Budget Work Session - April 22, 2026
Richmond City Council Budget Work Session - April 22, 2026
The Richmond City Council held a budget work session on April 22, 2026, to discuss amendments to the Fiscal Year 2027 budget using the FY25 surplus and to address outstanding items. Key topics included clarification of a one-time payment for retirees, reallocation of funding to cover salary increases, budget transparency for complete streets, and the future of the Richmond Virtual Academy (RVA). The council reached consensus on several amendments and set next steps for final adoption.
Discussion Items
-
COLA Clarification for Retirees: Councilmember Trammell addressed confusion in the media, emphasizing that the approved payment for Richmond Retirement System beneficiaries is a one-time payment equivalent to a 1% cost-of-living adjustment (COLA), not a bonus. RJ Warren, Council Chief of Staff, explained that the one-time payment amounts to $716,000 and is the equivalent of a 1% COLA for one year, but does not commit to ongoing COLAs. Councilmembers agreed to hold a future meeting to explore permanent COLA solutions.
-
Salary Adjustment Funding Gap: The council learned that moving all city employee salary adjustments (3.25%) to July 1 instead of a phased January start would require an additional $113,092 beyond the remaining $600 available from the surplus. Councilmember Lynch proposed reallocating $125,000 originally earmarked for a Clark Springs feasibility study to close the gap, which would leave $11,908 remaining. The council consensus moved those remaining funds to the Randolph Community Center for equipment replacement.
-
Transparency and Revenue Questions: Councilmember Gibson questioned the $3.168 million figure from the FY25 amended budget, arguing that $3.9 million in recurring revenue should have been carried forward. CAO Donald explained that the $12 million in additional assessments from FY25 were recurring revenue used for one-time purposes due to assessment-cycle misalignment, and that the $3.168 million remaining is the unspent balance of that one-time allocation. He assured council that the assessment freeze would align future budgets. Councilmember Breton supported Gibson's inquiry, noting that the FY26 budget base did not reflect the FY25 amended amounts.
-
Complete Streets Budget Transparency: Councilmember Breton proposed breaking the $21 million complete streets line item into four subcategories (paving, sidewalks, CIP support, and engineering/planning) to improve transparency. CAO Donald offered to provide a supplemental page in the budget book detailing the planned breakdown without restricting flexibility. The council appeared supportive, and staff will work with the administration to finalize the approach.
-
TJ High School Athletic Lights: Councilmember Breton proposed reducing the car wash budget from $200,000 to $100,000 and redirecting the savings to fund athletic training lights at TJ High School. The council agreed to allocate $100,000 to the Richmond Education Foundation (or directly to RPS if necessary) to leverage matching grants and private donations.
-
Richmond Virtual Academy (RVA): Superintendent Jason Kamras confirmed that without additional funding, RVA will not continue. He stated that all current RVA students (including those with disabilities) will be served in person, and that RVA's 25 staff members (mostly licensed teachers) will be offered positions in other schools. Several councilmembers expressed concern, but Kamras emphasized that nearly all students with disabilities in RPS already attend in-person schools and that the virtual program is not the least restrictive environment for most. Councilmember Gibson noted that transitions are hard and urged the school board to consider a scaled-back version. Councilmember Robertson acknowledged the difficult choices and thanked the superintendent for his work.
Key Outcomes
- Consensus on Budget Amendments: The council agreed to the following amendments:
- Reallocate $125,000 from Clark Springs study to cover the salary adjustment funding gap.
- Allocate the remaining $11,908 to Randolph Community Center for equipment.
- Cut $100,000 from the car wash budget and direct it to TJ High School athletic lights through the Richmond Education Foundation.
- Maintain previously agreed-upon items from the Monday session (e.g., positions for assessor's office, sustainability coordinator, attorney, investigator, PDR; text amendments for gap grant reallocation, affordable housing trust fund language, pay plan severance language, and Ponticello park encumbrance).
- Text Amendments: The council will include: (1) directive to use remaining gap grant funds for housing initiatives, (2) correction of affordable housing trust fund language, (3) removal of severance package language from the pay plan, and (4) encumbrance of remaining funds for Ponticello park improvements. A request by Councilmember Robertson for performance measures to be provided by July 1 was accepted, and the administration agreed to update the budget book using three quarters of data.
- Next Steps: Council staff will work with the city attorney and administration to draft amendments for the formal council meeting on April 27, 2026. A public hearing and final vote on the budget are scheduled for May 11, 2026.
Meeting Transcript
Everyone. Good afternoon, everyone. The city council's budget work session will now come to order. And Madam Clerk or Mr. Clerk, if you would provide us with the emergency evacuation announcements. Upon activation of the emergency alarm signal, all persons should immediately exit the building. Please use the exits to the left or right front of the council chamber or the east or west stairwell outside the rear doors of the chamber. Do not use elevators or escalators. After exiting the building, security will direct everyone down 9th Street to the assembly area located inside the former public safety building parking lot. Able persons should assist visually and hearing impaired visitors with exiting the building. Thank you, Mr. Clark. Mr. Warren, our council chief of staff will provide the protocol for this meeting. And then prior to our going into our discussion, council member Tram will wanted to provide comment. So do you want to Adam President? I want to um I've been getting calls this morning. People upset they saw something in the Times dispatch. And I've already spoken to Parker, and it was definitely some confusion the other day with this cola. And it's no no fault of Samuel Parker, no fault of you, RJ, or but I want to I want to have it cleared up because I think we kept saying it was supposed to be a cola, but then it got printed that it was a bonus. It is not a bonus, it is a cola. So if you can please, because people are listening and the retirees, some of them in my district are very upset because they said not really saying I didn't tell the truth, but they said when I called him, I told him this was not a bonus, this was a cola. So what this is, RJ uh May Place Council, RJ Warren, Council Chief of Staff. So what this is, there is a desire to find a long-term solution for establishing permanent colas that happen frequently, maybe even annually. That needs to be addressed still with you know after this budget season. So what we established the other day on Monday is instead of doing a forcing the issue of a cola to a permanent cola to happen that would require 10 years of payment on one cola. What we were doing is we were providing member uh members of the Richmond Retirement System who are receiving benefits at this time. A one percent a one-time payment, a bonus payment that is the equivalent of a one percent cola for this year. So if we were to have approved an actual cola, it would have been for one percent, and uh it would have been for forever, but we have to figure out how to finance that. So, right now, until we bridge that solution, what this is is a one-time payment in the amount of a one year one year's worth of a one percent cola. So they are getting one percent more this year and their benefits than they did last year. But we got to find a solution for next year. Because we started out like a 1.5, but then it went to one per. Yes, ma'am. That's right. But it we're gonna make it clear right now, this is not a bonus, this is a cola. And we, as our the president of council said, we are going to bring that board here, and we're gonna have some discussion and I mean some good discussion to find out how or to make have some solutions so we don't have to go through this every year, because like they said, it's been 16 years and it's not fair. It's on top of my to it's on top of my to-do list. This issue. As of today, want everybody to hear this. This is not a bonus, this is a cola, and we will go from here. Make it happen. It is a one-time payment. I have to clarify that. We have to address it again. But is that but next year it's not going to be a no bonus either? We got to go back and do we'll have to go back to the get the word bonus. We get that word bonus. I don't want to hear that. This is a cola.
openpublica.com