Richmond City Council OD Committee Meeting - July 7, 2026
Richmond City Council Organizational Development Committee Meeting - July 7, 2026
The Richmond City Council Organizational Development (OD) Standing Committee met on July 7, 2026, to approve previous minutes and receive two major presentations: a no-cost solar power purchase agreement (PPA) opportunity for city-owned buildings and an update on the transition of emergency medical dispatch calls to the Richmond Ambulance Authority (RAA). Council members expressed strong support for the solar initiative while raising concerns about the implementation timeline for the EMS transition, which was originally set to take effect 30 days after the June 8, 2026 ordinance (i.e., July 8, 2026).
Consent Calendar
- Minutes from the Monday, June 1, 2026 Organizational Development Standing Committee meeting were approved as presented without amendments.
Discussion Items
-
Solar Power Purchase Agreement Presentation: Don Olesky, Energy Program Manager from the Office of Sustainability, presented a no-cost opportunity to install solar panels on city-owned buildings via a third-party PPA. The project would cover up to 5 megawatts across 27 sites (30 properties, including four at the wastewater treatment plant), with projected utility cost avoidance of more than $12 million over the 25-year term. Olesky noted that the city spent $18.7 million on electricity last year and faced a 23.5% rate increase as of July 1, 2026, with an additional 11.5% increase projected next July. The city would ride on Prince William County Public Schools’ existing cooperative procurement contract with Secure Solar Futures, a B Corp with a strong Virginia track record. The timeline requires council approval by the end of September 2026 to meet federal tax credit deadlines. Council members expressed enthusiasm for the project, with Councilman Breton questioning the 3% annual rate increase assumption and Councilwoman Abacher noting the need for broader energy reduction strategies. Councilwoman Trammel requested more input from Public Utilities Director Scott Morris. Vice President Jordan thanked staff and noted constituent interest. Councilwoman Trammel also asked about workforce development commitments, and Olesky confirmed partnerships with Bridging the Gap Virginia. No action was taken; the item will return for introduction on September 14, 2026.
-
Transition of Emergency Medical Call Services to RAA Update: Chip Decker, CEO of Richmond Ambulance Authority, reported that RAA is prepared to receive emergency medical calls, with additional staff assigned, continuous training, and quality assurance measures in place. He noted that two scheduled meetings with DECPR (Department of Emergency Communications) were canceled. Ms. Lawson, Chief of Staff to the Mayor, then provided an update: DECPR has developed a draft Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) currently under review by the city attorney’s office, expected to be shared with RAA by the end of next week. The MOU will require council approval before calls can be transferred. The proposed timeline is introduction on September 14, 2026, with passage at the second September meeting. Lawson also noted that 75% of current DECPR personnel have never processed medical calls using a transfer-to-EMS model and will require retraining. Council members expressed frustration, particularly Councilwoman Trammel, who argued that the ordinance passed on June 8, 2026, specified a 30-day effective date (July 8, 2026) and that the city had not acted in good faith. She demanded immediate action and requested a public safety committee agenda item on delays in police and fire response to 9-1-1 calls. Councilwoman Abacher questioned why an MOU was needed now when no such agreement was required when calls were transferred away from RAA in 2024. The city attorney indicated she would research the legal basis for the MOU requirement. Committee members directed Lawson to provide a written memo by July 15, 2026, and a substantive update on the transition timeline by Wednesday, July 8, 2026, following a meeting with RAA and DECPR leadership.
Key Outcomes
- Minutes Approved: June 1, 2026 OD meeting minutes approved.
- Solar PPA: No action taken; presentation received. Item set for introduction at September 14, 2026 meeting, with adoption target September 28, 2026.
- EMS Transition: Council directed the administration to provide a written update on the transition timeline by Wednesday, July 8, 2026, and a formal memo by July 15, 2026. A meeting between RAA, DECPR, and administration leadership is expected to occur before that date. Councilwoman Trammel’s request for a public safety committee agenda item on police/fire response delays was acknowledged.
- Special Meeting: A planned special closed session meeting was canceled; a future date will be scheduled.
Meeting Transcript
Good afternoon again. Mr. Clark. Madam Chair, the minutes to be approved are from the Monday, June 1st, 2026 Organizational Development Standing Committee meeting. If there are no corrections or amendments, then the minutes will be approved as presented. Those minutes have been approved. Thank you, Mr. Clark. Let's proceed with the reports for today's OD meeting. Don Olesky Energy Program Manager Office of Sustainability. Good afternoon. I'm Don Olexi, the Energy Program Manager from the Office of Sustainability, and I'm here to tell you about a no-cost opportunity to get solar panels on city-owned buildings so we can both mitigate the rising electric costs and get closer to our carbon reduction goals. We have been looking at solar power purchase agreements for over 10 years, exploring ways that we can use this as a financing mechanism. However, legal hurdles have prevented us from pursuing this until now. We have extra motivation right now with the expiration of the federal tax credits with up to 50% of project costs that will make these projects more economically viable, meaning we can get cheaper electricity from our own rooftops rather than we would be paying Dominion. Staff has been working collaboratively and creatively going above and beyond the past several months to find a solution that will work for Richmond. So in terms of the project background, the community climate collaborative partnered with us to apply to the municipal investment fund, and we are one of 48 localities selected across the country to develop a clean energy pipeline that would drive the local economy toward an investment in our workforce, uncover financing opportunities, and identify clean energy projects in the commercial, residential, and municipal sectors. So over that period of time, over 50 stakeholder interviews were held with financing partners, solar developers and installers, representatives from the housing sector, nonprofits and faith-based institutions, workforce development advocates and specialists, and multiple city departments and state agencies. We really did our our homework here. What was found is that here on the city-owned buildings, we have over 10 megawatts of solar potential. But due to the short timeline with the expiring tax credits, we would have to find a cooperative procurement to ride. So let me tell you a little more about what is a solar power purchase agreement. This is when a third-party solar developer installs solar at no cost to the city on our buildings, and they continue to own the array through the contract, the 25-year contract term, and then during that time we use the power generated in our own buildings and pay a rate for that electricity to the developer. This wouldn't be budgeted separately. This slide shows you the pros and cons of third-party ownership versus direct ownership. Obviously, the solar company owns and operates and maintains the panels. There's no upfront cost to the city. Contractual simplicity, we don't have to manage subcontractors and all of the complications that can come with multiple contracts. Right now we have solar on TB Smith, that one building, and that that took a long time to do. So direct ownership, on the other hand, there would be zero energy payments. So TB Smith, we're just reaping the benefits of those solar panels without a contractual agreement. And of course, direct ownership provides maximum flexibility, but it also requires a hundred percent upfront costs. So this current opportunity, we looked at all the potential contracts in Virginia and selected Prince William County public schools because it allows for multiple sites, it allows for the five-year lease renewals that are required for the Municipal Lease Act. It's an active contract and it has the cooperative language. So what we learned about it is that they put their RFP to bid in 2022 and received 10 proposals, then they narrowed it to five for formal vetting and ultimately selected secure solar futures for their experience, extensive experience in Virginia, their competitive pricing, and their strong educational offerings. We did our own research, of course, with Secure Solar Futures. We learned that they co-founded the RVA solar grant program with Greater Richmond Community Foundation in 2018 and executed a power purchase agreement for 10 Richmond public school buildings in 2019. They also did the first commercial solar installation in Virginia under a PPA with the University of Richmond, and they've installed the solar on Caritas, just to name a few. They're a leader in state solar legislation. They brought the power purchase agreement model to Virginia in 2004, and they're a B Corp, so a great track record. In terms of the sites that we're talking about, we started with all city-owned buildings and we narrowed it down. We looked at the age of the roof, shading potential of that rooftop, future plans of the building, the height of the building, potential roof obstructions, and the on-site energy usage. Then we met with the department directors of the buildings that were viable and spoke with dozens of city staff to confirm the approvals of each site and address any potential barriers, all the way down to does this rooftop has have an antenna on it. We ran preliminary site feasibility studies, mocked up the arrays, and calculated the solar potential throughout the year. So as long as the financial modeling allowed for the pricing structure to offer electricity rates lower than we're paying Dominion, the buildings were kept on the list. In terms of alignment with the five with these five pillars, we're talking about an efficient city hall that gets things done, affordability, sustainable infrastructure, community resilience, public health. And because of this, we have and more, we have tremendous opportunities for community engagement as well as opportunities to educate Richmonders about solar panels, solar job trainings, resilience hubs, carbon reduction, and utility cost stability. When we're talking about priority alignment specifically, solar workforce training is a specific strategy in RBA Green 2050. We've been supporting that through several solar training programs, and we're really excited about this because it brings a catalyst opportunity for employment. It aligns with the RBA Green 2050 greenhouse gas reduction goals and the renewable energy targets that we've set.
openpublica.com