OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Rockville Planning Commission Meeting: April 8, 2026

Meeting PortalWednesday, April 8, 2026
BodyRockville, Maryland
SessionMeeting Portal
DateWednesday, April 8, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 1:11:30

Transcript — Verbatim
0:02

Good evening, Rockville.

0:04

Today is Wednesday, April 8th, 2026.

0:08

This is meeting 626 of the City of Rockville Planning Commission.

0:12

I am Mongsen, Chair of the Planning Commission.

0:15

I'm joined in Chamber by Commissioners Jeff Zains, Sulan Pitman and Eric Foten, and online by Commissioner Jamie Esponosa.

0:24

Commissioner Shayen Saladin will join us shortly.

0:28

Tonight's meeting is being conducted in person and virtually by WebEx.

0:33

Tonight's agenda includes one review and action item, and this will be followed by our regular scheduled commission agendas.

0:41

And does any commissioner have any thoughts before we proceed?

0:46

Okay.

0:47

So let's proceed with today's fourth agenda.

0:51

Compatibility finding for residential youth in the MX e zone for level one set plan application 2026-225-STP.

1:02

A proposal to construct 68 tool over two condominium units at two research plays.

1:09

James Salt has and James and SOT has INC is the applicant.

1:15

So Mr.

1:15

Westlet, is there a presentation from staff?

1:19

Yes, madam chair.

1:20

Just by way of introduction, this is an unusual situation.

1:25

In the 17 years that we've had the current code, we've not encountered this.

1:30

But uh the project pencils out essentially to a level one site plan, which the chief of zoning is the approving authority.

1:37

But the way the code is written, the compatibility finding for this particular residential use in the this particular zone, which is the MXE, is required to be made by either the mayor and council or the planning commission if it is not recommended in the comprehensive plan.

1:52

So here we are, and uh you are tasked with making that compatibility finding this evening.

2:01

And with that, I will turn it over to Christopher Davis, who will make the staff presentation.

2:08

Thank you.

2:09

Good evening, Planning Commission.

2:13

Before Mr.

2:14

Davis begins, I will swear him in.

2:16

If you could identify yourself for the record.

2:19

Christopher Davis.

2:20

And will you provide truthful testimony?

2:22

I will.

2:23

Thank you.

2:23

Please proceed.

2:52

All right, thank you.

2:53

Good evening, Madam Chair and members of the commission.

2:57

Um, as Mr.

2:58

Wasserleck indicated, this is a compatibility finding for a level one site plan at two research place.

3:11

So as you can see on the screen, the uh subject property is highlighted in red.

3:17

It is located at two research place within planning area 15, corresponding to the Falls Grove and Research Boulevard area.

3:26

The site is approximately 2.8 acres in size and has a land use designation of office.

3:34

Uh the zoning for the property, as Mr.

3:36

Wasleck indicated, is MXE, which corresponds to the city's mixed use employment zone, and the existing use for the property is office.

3:46

Uh as you can see from the area, the property is improved with a uh office building centrally located on the site and provides um access via an existing driveway to research place, uh, the terminus of research place, which is a cul-de-sac.

4:06

As you can see from the surrounding properties, uh, they are also improved with uh centrally located office buildings surrounded by surface parking.

4:18

And the site further gains access from research place to research boulevard to the southwest.

4:24

Um, notably, as you can see, these properties above I-270 to the northeast.

4:30

Um, and uh the is a larger property to the south improves with several office buildings as well.

4:42

So for some brief background on this particular property, uh the site was approved for a level two site plan back in June of 2023, where the planning commission approved uh a multi building development, including a life science building uh with approximately 200,000 square feet of gross floor area and a multi story parking garage.

5:07

The applicant intended to move forward with that life science use, but was unable to find a tenant to fulfill that use, and subsequently that approval for the life science building expired in June of 2025.

5:24

The applicant has now shifted its intended purpose for the property, and their current proposal has shifted to a residential development where the proposal is to demolish the existing office building and construct 68 two over two condominium units.

5:53

Proposed, several with a north-south orientation, and most of the units with the east-west orientation.

6:03

As you can see, the development will be provided access from that research place CuldeSec via a new private driveway, which will give access to each of the units rear loaded garages.

6:18

There are several open spaces proposed on the site, most notably this central open space between the units, approximately plan center here as well as along the eastern or the plan east side of the property with several pedestrian and resident amenities proposed in those spaces.

6:43

Several additional parking spaces are proposed, plan north to provide visitor parking for the site.

6:54

So relating specifically to the compatibility finding, the zoning ordinance requires that the planning commission determine compatibility for the project, as Mr.

7:03

Waselec indicated due to the proposed residential use and the existing zoning for the site.

7:11

The plan and commission must determine that the use is compatible with the adjoining and confronting uses by means of landscaping screening or other measures.

7:26

So shown here on the screen is the applicant's proposed landscape plan.

7:43

Those treatments are anticipated to provide compatibility which with each of the adjoining uses surrounding the site.

8:17

Some example images of the landscaping are shown here on the screen.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Zoning And Land Use█████████████████████████████████████████████61%
Transportation Safety███████10%
Public Engagement██████8%
Procedural█████7%
Environmental Protection████5%
Economic Development███4%
Affordable Housing███4%
Zoning Ordinance Rewrite1%
Summary of Proceedings

Rockville Planning Commission Meeting: April 8, 2026

The April 8, 2026 meeting of the Rockville Planning Commission (Meeting 626) focused on a compatibility finding for a residential development at 2 Research Place, along with updates on the zoning ordinance rewrite and approval of previous meeting minutes. The commission approved the compatibility finding, supporting the conversion of an office building into 68 two-over-two condominium units.

Consent Calendar

  • Approved minutes for Meeting 11-2025 (September 10, 2025) as presented, with Commissioner Espinoza noting his absence.
  • Approved minutes for Meeting 12-2025 (September 24, 2025) with a revision to reflect Commissioner Espinoza's full absence.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • One member of the public, a graduate student in land use planning visiting from Wisconsin, attended the meeting for an academic requirement but declined to offer substantive input on the agenda item.

Discussion Items

  • Compatibility Finding for Residential Use in MXE Zone (Case 2026-225-STP):
    • Staff from the Planning Commission presented the unusual situation: the zoning code requires a compatibility finding for residential use in the MXE zone if not recommended in the comprehensive plan, making the planning commission the deciding body. The site at 2 Research Place (approximately 2.8 acres, currently office use) is proposed for demolition of the existing building and construction of 68 two-over-two condominium units. The property is located near I-270 and adjacent to other office properties. The prior approval for a life science building expired in June 2025 due to lack of a tenant.
    • The applicant, James Salt (representing James Salt and Associates), explained the financial distress of the existing office building (valued at ~$4 million, down from a $9.5 million purchase price 20 years ago, with ~38% vacancy and rents declining from $25/sq. ft. to $20/sq. ft.). The applicant stated that the only viable option to address a coming bank note was conversion to residential. He noted that neighboring property owners are also exploring similar conversions, potentially leading to a mixed-use reimagining of Research Boulevard.
    • Commissioners discussed sound mitigation, focusing on a proposed 18-foot sound wall along I-270 and the possibility of extending it onto adjacent property (Rock Center). Commissioner Zains raised concerns about the proximity of townhouses to the wall (approximately eight feet), potential shading, and the adequacy of sound mitigation if the wall is not extended. The applicant stated that if the neighbor does not proceed, they would build a wraparound wall. The applicant also noted interior mitigation (brick exteriors, high-STF windows) in the acoustical report.
    • Other commission members (Salahoudin, Foten) supported the project, emphasizing the need for affordable housing and a positive vision for the area, and they expressed trust that the noise condition could be met flexibly. Commissioner Zains proposed a condition requiring no units closer than 30 feet to the sound wall, but this was not adopted by the full commission.

Key Outcomes

  • Compatibility Finding: The Planning Commission voted unanimously (members present all in favor; Commissioner Espinoza absent) to approve the compatibility finding for the proposed construction of 68 two-over-two condominium units at 2 Research Place, subject to staff conditions and an additional condition requiring noise compliance before occupancy.
  • Additional Condition: The applicant must demonstrate compliance with applicable noise regulations (MCPS staff guidelines) prior to approval of the Level 1 site plan and before issuance of any occupancy permit. This ensures that whatever mitigation measures are chosen (e.g., extended wall, wraparound wall, interior construction) are in place before residents move in.
  • Next Steps: The Level 1 site plan will be finalized by staff and approved by the Chief of Zoning. The applicant will return to the commission for submission of the detailed site plan.
  • Zoning Ordinance Rewrite Update: The Mayor and Council's initial work session on the zoning ordinance rewrite and comprehensive map amendment was rescheduled from March 27 to April 13, 2026. Public hearings are now set for April 13 and May 4, with work sessions on May 4, 11, and 18, and potential adoption on July 6. Staff will release a revised draft on April 20.
  • Future Agenda Items: The next commission meeting on April 22 will discuss the Bus Rapid Transit system on Veirs Mill Road (mandatory referral). A later meeting in May will consider the Rockville Senior Center project (mandatory referral).

Meeting Transcript

Good evening, Rockville. Today is Wednesday, April 8th, 2026. This is meeting 626 of the City of Rockville Planning Commission. I am Mongsen, Chair of the Planning Commission. I'm joined in Chamber by Commissioners Jeff Zains, Sulan Pitman and Eric Foten, and online by Commissioner Jamie Esponosa. Commissioner Shayen Saladin will join us shortly. Tonight's meeting is being conducted in person and virtually by WebEx. Tonight's agenda includes one review and action item, and this will be followed by our regular scheduled commission agendas. And does any commissioner have any thoughts before we proceed? Okay. So let's proceed with today's fourth agenda. Compatibility finding for residential youth in the MX e zone for level one set plan application 2026-225-STP. A proposal to construct 68 tool over two condominium units at two research plays. James Salt has and James and SOT has INC is the applicant. So Mr. Westlet, is there a presentation from staff? Yes, madam chair. Just by way of introduction, this is an unusual situation. In the 17 years that we've had the current code, we've not encountered this. But uh the project pencils out essentially to a level one site plan, which the chief of zoning is the approving authority. But the way the code is written, the compatibility finding for this particular residential use in the this particular zone, which is the MXE, is required to be made by either the mayor and council or the planning commission if it is not recommended in the comprehensive plan. So here we are, and uh you are tasked with making that compatibility finding this evening. And with that, I will turn it over to Christopher Davis, who will make the staff presentation. Thank you. Good evening, Planning Commission. Before Mr. Davis begins, I will swear him in. If you could identify yourself for the record. Christopher Davis. And will you provide truthful testimony? I will. Thank you. Please proceed. All right, thank you. Good evening, Madam Chair and members of the commission. Um, as Mr. Wasserleck indicated, this is a compatibility finding for a level one site plan at two research place. So as you can see on the screen, the uh subject property is highlighted in red. It is located at two research place within planning area 15, corresponding to the Falls Grove and Research Boulevard area. The site is approximately 2.8 acres in size and has a land use designation of office. Uh the zoning for the property, as Mr. Wasleck indicated, is MXE, which corresponds to the city's mixed use employment zone, and the existing use for the property is office. Uh as you can see from the area, the property is improved with a uh office building centrally located on the site and provides um access via an existing driveway to research place, uh, the terminus of research place, which is a cul-de-sac. As you can see from the surrounding properties, uh, they are also improved with uh centrally located office buildings surrounded by surface parking. And the site further gains access from research place to research boulevard to the southwest. Um, notably, as you can see, these properties above I-270 to the northeast. Um, and uh the is a larger property to the south improves with several office buildings as well. So for some brief background on this particular property, uh the site was approved for a level two site plan back in June of 2023, where the planning commission approved uh a multi building development, including a life science building uh with approximately 200,000 square feet of gross floor area and a multi story parking garage. The applicant intended to move forward with that life science use, but was unable to find a tenant to fulfill that use, and subsequently that approval for the life science building expired in June of 2025. The applicant has now shifted its intended purpose for the property, and their current proposal has shifted to a residential development where the proposal is to demolish the existing office building and construct 68 two over two condominium units.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com