Thu, Nov 20, 2025·Sacramento, California·Active Transportation Commission

Sacramento Active Transportation Commission Meeting — November 20, 2025

Discussion Breakdown

Engineering And Infrastructure35%
Active Transportation22%
Mobility And Sustainability15%
Transportation Safety12%
Community Engagement8%
Disability Rights5%
Indigenous Acknowledgment3%

Summary

Sacramento Active Transportation Commission — November 20, 2025

The Active Transportation Commission met in regular session at City Hall (915 I Street) on Thursday, November 20, 2025, from 5:30 p.m. to 6:41 p.m. The Commission welcomed a new commissioner, received updates on major citywide and corridor planning efforts, heard an informational construction update on the Franklin Boulevard Complete Street project, and approved forwarding the 2025 Annual Report to the City Council’s Personnel and Public Employees Committee as part of the annual budget-priorities process.

Attendance

  • Present (10/10): Chair Arlete Hodel; Vice Chair Isaac Gonzalez, Jr.; Commissioners Debra Banks, Donald Gibson, Melissa Harris, Jim Houpt, David Moore, Justine Recio-Patel, Tong Thao, Emel Wadhwani
  • Absent: None

Staff Report (Commission Staff)

  • Public Works/Transportation Planning staff noted:
    • Oct. 30, 2025: Ribbon-cutting and trail opening for Ninos Parkway, adding a half-mile and connecting to a new development area.
    • Mid-December 2025 (anticipated): Del Rio Trail Bridge reopening; staff offered to coordinate a ribbon-cutting attendance email.
    • Commissioners were reminded to promptly respond to monthly attendance check emails from the Clerk’s Office to confirm quorum/meeting viability.

Consent Calendar

  • Approved unanimously (10-0) via one motion (Moved: Houpt; Second: Gonzalez)
    • Item 1: Approved draft minutes from October 16, 2025 (File ID: 2025-00242)
    • Item 2: Adopted the Active Transportation Commission Log (File ID: 2025-00201)

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Franklin Boulevard Complete Street (Item 3):
    • Michael Bevins (District 2; identified as a truck driver):
      • Position: Expressed that the redesign is a good and safer plan, but urged the City to better consider vehicle throughput with the lane reduction.
      • Requested tweaks including a wider bike lane to allow slow vehicle movements for turning into businesses, and clearer design/signage for how bicyclists should make left turns from the separated bikeway.
  • Matters not on the agenda: None.

Discussion Items

Franklin Boulevard Complete Street (T15165500) — Informational Update (Item 3)

  • Presenter: Megan Johnson, Senior Engineer, Public Works (Project Manager)
  • Location: Franklin Blvd from Sutterville Rd/12th Ave to 32nd Ave (District 5)
  • Context and conditions described by staff (project description):
    • Corridor carries approximately 18,000 cars per day and functions as a north–south bypass between I-5 and Hwy 99.
    • Community context included historic disinvestment and geographic isolation from freeway/rail infrastructure.
    • Staff cited a Healthy Places Index measure placing the surrounding area in the 3.5th percentile compared to California census districts.
    • Existing conditions: 4 travel lanes + center turn lane, no bike lanes, narrow attached sidewalks with little buffer, limited shade/trees, limited crossings, and dark nighttime conditions without pedestrian lighting.
    • Tree canopy disparity: staff stated that across the project’s approximately 1.5-mile limits, the City’s street-tree database shows only one tree (and the presenter stated she did not believe that tree actually exists).
  • Project elements described (project description):
    • Road diet to one lane each direction + center turn lane.
    • New separated Class IV bikeways with raised islands.
    • Widened/realigned sidewalks, pedestrian-scale lighting, and landscaping/trees.
    • New crossing at 18th Avenue with a refuge island and flashing beacon (presenter noted this location had a pedestrian fatality “a few years back”).
    • 21st Avenue intersection: raised/protected intersection design intended to slow all users; presenter stated it had the highest number of bicycle/pedestrian collisions in the corridor and that some involved children.
    • Parking generally not included due to constrained right-of-way, with limited locations using parking-separated bikeways.
    • ADA scope included reconstruction of non-ADA compliant driveways even in segments where sidewalk replacement was not otherwise occurring.
    • Coordination with Regional Transit for bus stop access; staff stated the primary overlap of transit service is north of 21st Avenue.
  • Funding and schedule (project description):
    • Staff reported securing over $21 million in federal grant funds (via SACOG and the California Transportation Commission), structured to minimize local match requirements.
    • Construction began April 2025; utilities/drainage/sidewalk/curb ramps/street lighting largely nearing completion.
    • Staff stated that if weather allows, paving could proceed through winter and the project could be operational by spring 2026.
    • Staff noted this effort combined phases 1 and 2; a Phase 3 project is in design to extend improvements toward the city/county line near 38th Avenue.
  • Commissioner discussion (positions/questions):
    • Vice Chair Gonzalez: Expressed strong support and appreciation for outreach to businesses and for pedestrian-focused lighting and tree planting; stated the corridor investment is “long overdue.”
    • Commissioner Thao: Asked about traffic study results and impacts of lane reduction.
      • Staff response: Traffic analysis projected a reduction of 1,900 to 3,000 cars per day, reflecting diversion of commuter traffic; staff also described benefits extending to nearby streets and reduced demand at the Sutterville/99 interchange.
    • Commissioner Banks: Praised the partnership and advocacy of the Franklin Boulevard business district and expressed support for that model of engagement.
    • Commissioner Recio-Patel: Asked about bus-route conflicts with the separated bikeway.
    • Chair Hodel: Asked about missing crosswalk layers in slides (staff confirmed crosswalks are included), right-of-way/easement challenges (staff described coordination with roughly ~80 properties to address encroachments and secure easements), ADA driveway slope corrections, and whether sidewalk obstructions would reduce accessibility (staff stated sidewalks would be minimum 6 feet and poles would be placed to preserve passable width).
  • Action: Received and discussed (no vote required).

Transportation Planning — Current and Planned Projects (Item 4)

  • Presenter: Chris Dougherty, Transportation Planning Manager
  • Key updates (project description):
    • Citywide plans:
      • Streets for People Plan (bike/ped master plan) slated for City Council adoption on Dec. 2, 2025 after ~4 years of work.
      • Vision Zero Action Plan update expected to go to City Council in spring 2026, aligning with updated federal standards.
    • Corridor plans underway: Connecting Howe Ave Safety & Mobility; Norwood Mobility; Arden-Auburn Mobility; Fruit Ridge Rd Safety & Mobility (Fruit Ridge plan logo rebranded that week per staff).
      • Connecting Howe and Norwood plans were described as in final engagement stages with expected completion/adoption in spring 2026.
      • Arden-Auburn and Fruit Ridge plans kicked off July 2025, with staff expecting about 24 months to complete.
    • Programs: bike parking program (including corrals and public right-of-way parking), Vision Zero program/education, and an active transportation education class.
      • Staff described the active transportation education class as monthly, free, and also used for a diversion program for people cited while biking or scootering.
    • Paused then restarting (due to staffing/vacancies): Transportation Demand Management policy update and Street Design Standards update; staff anticipated completion in 12–18 months after hiring.
    • Upcoming/initiating work:
      • Creative crosswalk policy update.
      • Implementation planning for SB 720 automated red-light enforcement (staff emphasized strict legal/implementation guidelines; coordination with attorneys underway).
      • Reconnecting Old North Sacramento planning effort: staff stated the broader SACOG grant award was about $22.5 million, with the City receiving approximately $1 million for Old North Sacramento planning. Funding available until 2029; staff anticipated releasing an RFP in January 2026.
  • Commissioner discussion (positions/questions):
    • Commissioner Recio-Patel: Asked about traffic calming/speed reduction on 24th Street; staff pointed to the City’s quick build program led by traffic engineering.
    • Commissioner Moore: Asked whether the Vision Zero technical advisory work would review findings before finalization; staff said they would follow up to confirm the review process.
    • Commissioner Banks: Asked how the quick build team overlaps with Vision Zero; staff stated they would follow up because they might be “misspeaking,” while Banks expressed expectation that quick build should be directly tied to Vision Zero.
  • Action: Received and commented (no vote required).

Active Transportation Commission — 2025 Annual Report (Item 5)

  • Presenter: Chris Dougherty (on behalf of Jeff Jelsma, who was traveling)
  • Key additions/changes described (project/policy description):
    • Recommended policy direction on Leading Pedestrian Intervals (LPIs) citywide (described as 5–10 seconds of pedestrian head start).
      • Recommendations included allowing LPIs citywide, adding them to the quick-build toolbox, implementing LPIs during signal upgrades, and conducting a citywide study.
      • Staff cautioned LPIs may require bringing intersections up to current ADA standards and can be “deceivingly more expensive” than expected.
    • Continued emphasis on a no turn on red policy citywide, framed as a recommendation to conduct a study (~$500,000 estimate) across approximately 830 signalized intersections to understand operational impacts and identify priority locations.
    • Recommended expanding/streamlining the creative crosswalk policy (~$100,000 staff-time estimate).
    • Staff stated the Commission targeted approximately $8 million in total “year one” costs (similar to the 2024 report), and noted prior-year items such as the quick build team were removed because they are now funded/underway.
  • Commissioner discussion (positions/questions):
    • Commissioner Thao & Commissioner Gibson: Expressed support for the report and its clarity; Gibson asked when it would go to the Personnel and Public Employees Committee (staff said earliest likely January 2026).
    • Vice Chair Gonzalez: Emphasized urgency of advancing the report early enough to influence the City’s budget process (noting past experience where final adoption timing limited budget influence).
    • Commissioner Banks: Noted she sent written recommendations through staff due to Brown Act considerations; staff recommended forming an ad hoc committee next year (suggested May 2026) to collaborate on the report within noticed-meeting requirements.
  • Action/Vote: Approved unanimously (10-0) to forward the 2025 Annual Report to the Personnel and Public Employees Committee (Moved: Thao; Second: Gonzalez).

Commissioner Comments — Ideas and Questions

  • Commissioner Gibson:
    • Encouraged commissioners and the public to contact City Council members/community groups after Thanksgiving to support the Annual Report through the approval process.
    • Reported multiple recent traffic fatalities and stated that between the September–October meeting there were “at least two,” and since the October meeting “at least seven,” including two on the day prior to the meeting; he listed locations and some details (including a fatal hit-and-run around 9:15 p.m. and another fatality around 12:30 p.m.). (These statements were presented as commissioner commentary and not independently verified during the meeting.)
  • Vice Chair Gonzalez:
    • Echoed safety concerns and referenced additional serious injuries (including a child near Power Inn and Elder Creek).
    • Noted the City’s recent rollout of an EV Blueprint plan and car share work; stated a program using bike lockers for e-trikes is expected to sunset at year-end and requested ideas for repurposing lockers at library sites; directed ideas to City staff (Rachel Patton).
    • Announced “save the date” for Jan. 7, 2026: Slow Down Sacramento’s second annual Day of Remembrance event for victims of traffic violence.
    • Commended Chair Hodel for two years of service as Chair.
    • Requested future items on the Commission Log:
      • Update on enforcement/policy for red paint daylighting.
      • Follow-up on Marysville Boulevard project concerns from an Oct. 27 walk audit workshop (AARP-sponsored), asserting that intersection improvements were strong but that sidewalk segments between intersections remained inaccessible/obstructed; requested the project return for additional review.
  • Commissioner Banks:
    • Announced she is stepping aside as Executive Director of the Sacramento Area Bicycle Advocates (SABA) and invited interested candidates to contact her.

Key Outcomes

  • Consent Calendar approved unanimously (10-0).
  • Franklin Boulevard Complete Street update received; construction status shared (construction began April 2025; goal stated as operational by spring 2026, weather permitting).
  • Transportation Planning work program received; key upcoming milestones included Streets for People Plan at City Council on Dec. 2, 2025, and Vision Zero Action Plan update anticipated spring 2026.
  • 2025 Annual Report approved unanimously (10-0) and forwarded to the Personnel and Public Employees Committee; staff indicated the earliest committee timing is likely January 2026.
  • Commission requested future follow-ups via the Commission Log on daylighting red paint enforcement/policy and Marysville Boulevard sidewalk accessibility concerns.

Meeting Transcript

Thank you. This is a very rare occurrence. Okay. Good evening. Welcome to the November 20th, 2025, Active Transportation Commission. The meeting is now called to order. Will the clerk please call the roll to establish a quorum? Thank you, Chair. Commissioners, please unmute Commissioner Harris. Here. Commissioner Gibson? Here. Commissioner Wadwani? Here. Commissioner Ratio Patel? Here. Vice Chair Gonzalez? Here. Commissioner Hopp? Here. Commissioner Tao? Here. Commissioner Moore? Present. Commissioner Banks? Here. And Chair Hodel? Here. Thank you. We have a quorum. Thank you. I would like to remind members of the public in chambers that if you would like to speak on an agenda item, please turn in a speaker slip when the item begins. You will have two minutes to speak once you are called on. After the first speaker, we will no longer accept speaker slips. We will now proceed with today's agenda. Please rise for the opening acknowledgments in honor of Sacramento's indigenous people and tribal lands. To the original people of this land, the Nisanan people, the Southern Maidu, Valley and Plains Miwok, Patwin Winton peoples, and the people of the Wilton Rancheria, Sacramento's only federally recognized tribe. May we acknowledge and honor the native people who came before us and still walk beside us today on these ancestral lands by choosing to gather together today in the active practice of acknowledgement and appreciation for Sacramento's indigenous people's history, contributions, and lives. Thank you. Please remain standing for the Pledge of Allegiance. I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for which it stands, one nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. I would like to welcome our new commissioner, Justine Reshio-Patel. Perhaps you could tell us a little bit about yourself. Hi, everyone. My name is Justine Reshio-Patel. I'm so honored to be here.