Sacramento Budget and Audit Committee Meeting - Performance Metrics and Measure U Review
Sacramento Budget and Audit Committee Meeting
Meeting Overview
The Budget and Audit Committee held a productive session focused on reviewing Measure U Community Advisory Committee recommendations for improving city performance measures and metrics.
Opening and Introductions
- Meeting called to order by Chair Darrell Steinberg
- Members present: Karina Talamantes, Mai Vang, Chair Steinberg
- Member absent: Eric Guerra
Consent Calendar
- Approved Budget and Audit Committee meeting minutes from September 24, 2024
- Accepted Fiscal Year 2022/23 Measure U Sales Tax Performance Audit
Discussion: Measure U Performance Metrics
- Measure U Community Advisory Committee presented recommendations for:
- Improving performance measurement methodologies
- Creating more objective, data-driven metrics
- Establishing clearer connections between program investments and community outcomes
Key Outcomes
- Agreed to collaborative approach between city staff and Measure U Committee
- Decided to schedule a workshop-style meeting before year-end
- Staff will present draft performance metrics to Measure U Committee
- Future meetings will include:
- Ongoing dialogue about performance measurement
- Potential presentations from funded organizations
- Tracking cumulative community investments
Public Comments
- Community members expressed desire for more transparent metrics
- Emphasized need for measurable impacts on youth, small businesses, and community resources
Next Steps
- City staff to develop updated performance metrics
- Measure U Committee to be actively engaged in metric development process
Meeting Transcript
Good morning, everyone. The second to see Council's budget and audit committee will come to order with the clerk please call the roll. Mayor Pro Tem Telemontes, Council member Gara will be absent. Council member Vang and Mayor Steinberg. I am here. Very good morning to everyone. Why don't we get right into the business if that's okay? We will do the pledge of allegiance of course in the landing knowledge minute, both our two o'clock and five o'clock meeting. Let's begin with the consent calendar. Are there any questions, comments, public testimony on the consent calendar? If not, I'd happily accept a motion. Very good, all in favor please say aye. Aye. That passes by unanimous vote of three to nothing. All right, we have one discussion item. It's very important one on the measure you community advisory committee's recommendations. Always an important discussion. Chair Dickinson, are you here to present for the commission? I am here to present and where one of our members will be here momentarily but I can I can begin our presentation. In Toxelo. That's a real test for me. We'll try it here. Thank you Mayor and Council members. I am Marge Dickinson. I'm Chair of the Measure You Community Advisory Committee and I will be joined here by committee member Teddy George Off who has provided expertise and leadership on the important issues around performance measures and metrics for our committee. We are pleased to be here to discuss our recommendations submitted on September 16th. As you know, one of the duties established for the measure you community advisory committee in 2018 and reaffirmed last night by this council in the updated boards and commissions ordinance is the review of performance measures and evaluation of city expenditures. Consistent with that mandate we provide these recommendations with the goal of establishing a meaningful partnership with the council and staff to establish performance measures and metrics that meet the needs of each party specifically for us that mandate you gave us. We urge you to move these recommendations forward to the council and to include direction to engage in an ongoing dialogue with committee representatives throughout the development process. Make no mind we are quite aware that staff has initiated efforts to define performance measures and we are pleased that that effort is underway and also we recognize that it is a complex, difficult undertaking. That said, we do feel that it is critically important that the measure you perspective be part of the ongoing dialogue and the development of these metrics because frankly we don't want to be, you know, have them developed done and then I say but you missed this or you missed that. We really want to be hand in hand walking into the metrics sunset with the staff effort. Can I ask a question on that please because I know in reading the staff report that the staff says reluctantly that they cannot accept or agree with the recommendation and I'm just wondering maybe just to join the conversation why is it either or here. In other words, yet the staff is working on performance based outcomes. You have some thoughtful recommendations here about how to do this. Why isn't this a collaborative effort for the city to then continue to improve and enhance its performance outcome? That's exactly what we would ask for and I think we think I think that the best way for us to do that is to be part of the conversation, the dialogue, the development effort in a, I'm going to say words that will probably drive people nuts on a day-to-day basis. Part of the team so that it isn't a matter of being presented with a done deal that it's a matter of, you know, jointly agreeing on a done deal that works or disagreeing in the end if you can't agree. But you're talking about the, and even if it's not day-to-day or hour-to-hour, but what is the process by which the measure you advisory committee and the city staff work together to try, to endeavor to try to get at a set of staff and community-driven recommendations that everyone can support? That's the question before us, right? The either or thing does, you know, my first instinct is it was either or we're sitting in camps here. Well, and if we were perceived as being our way or the highway, that is not, that is absolutely not,
openpublica.com